Upload
adele-tyler
View
225
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Teaching Teaching MethodologyMethodology
SBH Maieutic Standard SBH Maieutic Standard from the Greek, Socratic Methodfrom the Greek, Socratic Method
SBH ETHICAL STANDARD
A Unique Teaching
Methodology for Moral Reasoning
and Theoretical Construct
Sharon Kay Stoll, Ph.D. J ennifer M. Beller, Ph.D.
With Notes and Comments by: Sue Durrant, Ph.D. Michael Reall, Ph.D. John Murphy, Ph.D. Jim Wharton Qingyi Zheng, Ph.D.
SBH – A Learning SBH – A Learning PhilosophyPhilosophy Wholistic – p. 6Wholistic – p. 6 Consistent and Interactive Consistent and Interactive
– p. 7– p. 7 Student Behaviors – p. 8Student Behaviors – p. 8 Classroom Environment – Classroom Environment –
p. 10p. 10 Unique Question and Unique Question and
Answer Approach – p. 11Answer Approach – p. 11 Cognitive Structure – p. Cognitive Structure – p.
1111
SBH ETHICAL STANDARD
A Unique Teaching
Methodology for Moral Reasoning
and Theoretical Construct
Sharon Kay Stoll, Ph.D. J ennifer M. Beller, Ph.D.
With Notes and Comments by: Sue Durrant, Ph.D. Michael Reall, Ph.D. John Murphy, Ph.D. Jim Wharton Qingyi Zheng, Ph.D.
WholisticWholistic
Learning is Learning is embodied and embodied and concerned with concerned with the human the human experience.experience.
Learning is Learning is interactive and interactive and social.social.
Learning is an Learning is an integrated integrated cognitive process.cognitive process.
SBH ETHICAL STANDARD
A Unique Teaching
Methodology for Moral Reasoning
and Theoretical Construct
Sharon Kay Stoll, Ph.D. J ennifer M. Beller, Ph.D.
With Notes and Comments by: Sue Durrant, Ph.D. Michael Reall, Ph.D. John Murphy, Ph.D. Jim Wharton Qingyi Zheng, Ph.D.
Methodology is Methodology is Consistent and Consistent and InteractiveInteractive Teaching Teaching
BehaviorsBehaviors– Personality and Personality and
Academic Academic CredibilityCredibility
– Sport BackgroundSport Background– AppearanceAppearance– Can serve as a role Can serve as a role
model and mentormodel and mentor– Wants to make a Wants to make a
differencedifference– Is a Risk TakerIs a Risk Taker
SBH ETHICAL STANDARD
A Unique Teaching
Methodology for Moral Reasoning
and Theoretical Construct
Sharon Kay Stoll, Ph.D. J ennifer M. Beller, Ph.D.
With Notes and Comments by: Sue Durrant, Ph.D. Michael Reall, Ph.D. John Murphy, Ph.D. Jim Wharton Qingyi Zheng, Ph.D.
Student BehaviorsStudent Behaviors
Peer PressurePeer Pressure Examination of authoritarian rolesExamination of authoritarian roles Cognitive Conflict painfulCognitive Conflict painful Cognitive development is not Cognitive development is not
directly related to verbal activity – directly related to verbal activity – REFLECTION IS THE KEYREFLECTION IS THE KEY
Some moral questions will not Some moral questions will not generate discussion.generate discussion.
Classroom Classroom EnvironmentEnvironment Accepting ClassroomAccepting Classroom
– Respect for student, fairness Respect for student, fairness practiced.practiced.
Teacher listensTeacher listens Teacher knows each studentTeacher knows each student Players can listen and learn from Players can listen and learn from
each othereach other
Unique Question and Unique Question and Answer ApproachAnswer Approach Teacher Listening/CommunicationTeacher Listening/Communication
– Active versus passive listeningActive versus passive listening– Active listeningActive listening
Asking clarifying questionsAsking clarifying questions Restating questionsRestating questions Encouraging ElaborationEncouraging Elaboration Remembering dialogueRemembering dialogue
– Keep a diaryKeep a diary– Be class historianBe class historian– Good role model about listening/valuingGood role model about listening/valuing– Shows interestShows interest– Student learns patternsStudent learns patterns
Question strategiesQuestion strategies
The text is developed to take out The text is developed to take out the guess work, however, the more the guess work, however, the more we know about the process the we know about the process the better.better.– QuestionsQuestions
Difference between first and second order Difference between first and second order questioningquestioning
– First order – pseudo moral questionsFirst order – pseudo moral questions What is cheating?What is cheating? John, what is the right thing to do?John, what is the right thing to do? Josie, do you agree.Josie, do you agree.
Questioning strategies Questioning strategies continued.continued. Second order questions – asking the “why”? Second order questions – asking the “why”?
– Different variety of questionsDifferent variety of questions Clarifying probe –Clarifying probe –
– John, you answered…but didn’t you say last week that you won’t John, you answered…but didn’t you say last week that you won’t agree with this point of view, is this being consistent? Why or why agree with this point of view, is this being consistent? Why or why not?not?
Issue Specific ProbeIssue Specific Probe– What is the difference between cheating on your girl friend and What is the difference between cheating on your girl friend and
cheating in a game?cheating in a game? Inter-issue ProbeInter-issue Probe
– Which is more important, not cheating on your girl friend or not Which is more important, not cheating on your girl friend or not cheating in the game? Or is there a difference?cheating in the game? Or is there a difference?
Role Switch ProbeRole Switch Probe– So would it make a difference, if you were the one being cheated So would it make a difference, if you were the one being cheated
on?on? Universal Consequence –Universal Consequence –
– So if cheating is okay in this instance, does that mean that cheating So if cheating is okay in this instance, does that mean that cheating is okay in every instance?is okay in every instance?
Cognitive StructureCognitive Structure
Focuses on morality, ethics, Focuses on morality, ethics, virtue, principles, and rules virtue, principles, and rules and their application to and their application to individuals within a group.individuals within a group.– Rigorous Curriculum and Rigorous Curriculum and
ContentContent
SBH ETHICAL STANDARD
A Unique Teaching
Methodology for Moral Reasoning
and Theoretical Construct
Sharon Kay Stoll, Ph.D. J ennifer M. Beller, Ph.D.
With Notes and Comments by: Sue Durrant, Ph.D. Michael Reall, Ph.D. John Murphy, Ph.D. Jim Wharton Qingyi Zheng, Ph.D.
Moral Reasoning Moral Reasoning ScoresScores
05
101520253035
Pretest Posttest 4 year Post
University AUniversity BSchool C HSSchool D-HS