Upload
lydia-armstrong
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING
November 1st, 2012General Admin MeetingBY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D
Director of Human Resources
John McKelvey– Teachscape
November 1st, 2012General Admin MeetingBY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D
Director of Human Resources
John McKelvey– Teachscape
Some of the Slides are also based on the Danielson iobservation training (Pam Rosa) from WCRESA on April 3rd and 4th.
MCLSection 380.1249 3. C (i)
MCLSection 380.1249 3. C (i)
1. If the school administrator conducts teacher performance evaluations, the school administrator's training and proficiency in using the evaluation tool for teachers described in subsection (2)(d), including a random sampling of his or her teacher performance evaluations to assess the quality of the school administrator's input in the teacher performance evaluation system.
1. If the school administrator conducts teacher performance evaluations, the school administrator's training and proficiency in using the evaluation tool for teachers described in subsection (2)(d), including a random sampling of his or her teacher performance evaluations to assess the quality of the school administrator's input in the teacher performance evaluation system.
Michigan Training Grant MCL 388.1695.
Michigan Training Grant MCL 388.1695.
Sec. 95. (1) From the funds appropriated in section 11, there is allocated an amount not to exceed $1,750,000.00 for 2012-2013 for grants to districts to support professional development for principals and assistant principals in a department-approved training program for implementing educator evaluations as required under section 1249 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1249.
Sec. 95. (1) From the funds appropriated in section 11, there is allocated an amount not to exceed $1,750,000.00 for 2012-2013 for grants to districts to support professional development for principals and assistant principals in a department-approved training program for implementing educator evaluations as required under section 1249 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1249.
Grant StipulationsGrant Stipulations Districts Can apply for $350 per building administrator
Must be an approved MDE training module. Contain instructional content on methods of evaluating teachers consistently across multiple grades and subjects.
(b) Include training on evaluation observation that is focused on reliability and bias awareness and that instills skills needed for consistent, evidence-based observations.
Districts Can apply for $350 per building administrator
Must be an approved MDE training module. Contain instructional content on methods of evaluating teachers consistently across multiple grades and subjects.
(b) Include training on evaluation observation that is focused on reliability and bias awareness and that instills skills needed for consistent, evidence-based observations.
Grant StipulationsGrant Stipulations (c) Incorporate the use of videos of actual lessons for applying rubrics and consistent scoring.
(d) Align with recommendations of the governor's council on educator effectiveness.
(e) Provide ongoing support to maintain inter-rater reliability. As used in this subdivision, "inter-rater reliability" means a consistency of measurement from different evaluators independently applying the same evaluation criteria to the same classroom observation.
(c) Incorporate the use of videos of actual lessons for applying rubrics and consistent scoring.
(d) Align with recommendations of the governor's council on educator effectiveness.
(e) Provide ongoing support to maintain inter-rater reliability. As used in this subdivision, "inter-rater reliability" means a consistency of measurement from different evaluators independently applying the same evaluation criteria to the same classroom observation.
The Danielson Teachscape Model
The Danielson Teachscape Model
Highest Validity and Reliability based on state study of current evaluation models.
State is currently piloting four different models
Link:http://www.teachscape.com/products/danielson-proficiency-system
Highest Validity and Reliability based on state study of current evaluation models.
State is currently piloting four different models
Link:http://www.teachscape.com/products/danielson-proficiency-system
PlanPlan We had a review committee Brainstorm ideas
We will be able to receive training via the following methods
Gen Admin large group discussion Secondary Admin or Elementary Forum Small Group example, instructional rounds
We had a review committee Brainstorm ideas
We will be able to receive training via the following methods
Gen Admin large group discussion Secondary Admin or Elementary Forum Small Group example, instructional rounds
PlanPlan As individuals on-line from any location
All individuals will take an exam at the end to receive certification
Increase Rater-Reliability and Credibility
Working on letter of agreement with ADSA for comp day.
As individuals on-line from any location
All individuals will take an exam at the end to receive certification
Increase Rater-Reliability and Credibility
Working on letter of agreement with ADSA for comp day.
FrameworkFramework
Dearborn : Standards
1. Classroom Environment
2. Preparation and Planning
3. Instruction 4. Assessment 5. Communication and Professional Responsibilities
Dearborn : Standards
1. Classroom Environment
2. Preparation and Planning
3. Instruction 4. Assessment 5. Communication and Professional Responsibilities
Danielson: Domains
1. Planning and Preparation
2. Classroom Environment
3. Instruction 4. Professional Responsibilities
Danielson: Domains
1. Planning and Preparation
2. Classroom Environment
3. Instruction 4. Professional Responsibilities
Danielson I-observation technique
Danielson I-observation technique
1. Verbatim, scripting of teacher or student comments
2. non-evaluative statements of observed teacher and student behavior.
3. Quantitative Data, time on task, assessment etc.
4. Environmental observations
1. Verbatim, scripting of teacher or student comments
2. non-evaluative statements of observed teacher and student behavior.
3. Quantitative Data, time on task, assessment etc.
4. Environmental observations
Other Dearborn to Danielson Framework
correlations
Other Dearborn to Danielson Framework
correlations Dearborn 4 Levels: ineffective, minimally effective, effective, highly effective
Danielson, unsatisfactory, basic, proficient, distinguished
Elements in both models, but Danielson has attributes
Dearborn 4 Levels: ineffective, minimally effective, effective, highly effective
Danielson, unsatisfactory, basic, proficient, distinguished
Elements in both models, but Danielson has attributes
ObservationsObservations
What are the strengths? What are the weaknesses? What do you still wonder after viewing a snapshot of the lesson? What questions?
What recommendations might you have?
What are the strengths? What are the weaknesses? What do you still wonder after viewing a snapshot of the lesson? What questions?
What recommendations might you have?