Upload
leonard-welch
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Teacher Effectiveness: All of Your Questions Answered
Matt Gill , Tammy Meyer, Robin Curtis10/15/2015
Teacher Effectiveness Overview
Background
• Principle 3 of the ESEA Waiver to No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
• Commission on Teaching and Learning (CTL) created to design the Teacher and Principal Educator effectiveness models–Includes teachers, principals, higher
ed, SD DOE, SDEA, EDEC
TIMELINE REVIEW
• SY 2014-15 : Teacher Effectiveness Learning Year
• SY: 2015-16: Teacher Effectiveness Full Implementation
– Includes SLO and Danielson-aligned Professional Practice Rating
• Fall 2016: Submission of district-level aggregate Teacher
Effectiveness data from SY 2015-16 via PRF
– Data will NOT be reported individually
The Parts
• Professional Practice Rating– South Dakota Framework for Teaching
• Student Growth Rating– Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
• Summative Teacher Effectiveness Rating–Combination of the Professional Practice and
Student Growth Ratings
Summative Rating MatrixProfessional Oversight: Is the rating fair and accurate based on the evidence
and data shared by the teacher
Determining Teacher EffectivenessUsing multiple measures of professional practice and student learning
Domain 1 Domain 2 Domain 3 Domain 4
Planning and Preparation
Classroom Environment
InstructionProfessional
Responsibilities
• Classroom Observations and Evidence of Effective Practice
• Components from Each of the 4 Domains
• At Least 8 Components Chosen Based on District or School Priorities
South Dakota Framework for Teaching
Professional Practice Rating
Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
Differentiated Performance Categories
Student Growth
SLOs
Growth Rating
SLOs
State Assessments(as one measure if available)
District Assessments
Evaluator-Approved Assessments
Professional Practice Rating
Student Growth Rating
Summative Evaluation
Rating
Summative Scoring Matrix
Summative Teacher Effectiveness Rating Categories
Below Expectations
Meets Expectations
Exceeds Expectations
JudgmentRating Subject
to Review✪
Misconceptions
• Use of the state assessment– The state assessment IS NOT the measure of the SLO in tested
grades and subjects– Used to prioritize the learning content and develop SLO baseline
• Used as a “gotcha” – FALSE– This model is all about growth for all and focused conversations
• Use of Teacher Effectiveness Ratings– The SD DOE only reports state-level aggregate data
• Length of SLO– SLO should last the duration of the class (semester, year) and
cover the most important learning
The Aspiration: Improve Instruction and Student Learning
1. Encourage meaningful, in-depth dialogue focused on improving instruction
2. Provide regular, timely, useful feedback that guides professional growth
3. Support a culture in which data drives instructional decisions
4. Establish clear expectations for teacher performance5. Use multiple measures to meaningfully determine
and differentiate teacher performance6. Provide a fair, flexible, research-based model that
informs personnel decisions.
Lesson’s Learned
Differentiated Goal
**Recommended, not Required**• 1. Disaggregate your pre-assessment
data and develop differentiated individual or group goals.
• 2. Write you SLO so that it includes 100% of your students.
• 100% of my students will reach their individual teacher-created growth goal.
Why Differentiated SLOs?
– All students CAN show growth.– All students CAN and SHOULD be included in
instruction.– Differentiated SLOs become a true GROWTH goal, set
by the teacher who best understands what is realistic and rigorous for the children in his/her classroom.
– Doesn’t an SLO like “90% of students will score an 85% or higher on the math assessment” sound a lot like AMOs? NCLB?
Handbooks
• Teacher Effectiveness– http://doe.sd.gov/oatq/documents/TeachEff.pdf
• Student Learning Objective (SLO)– http://doe.sd.gov/oatq/documents/SLObook-D.pdf
• Principal Effectiveness– http://doe.sd.gov/oatq/documents/Princbook.pdf
Comparison of State Requirements to Recommended Model
• http://doe.sd.gov/secretary/documents/TEReqReco.pdf
• Tammy – What you Learned
• Robin – what you learned
• The State – what you learned
SDEA Resources
• SLO Attainment Calculator - http://sdea.org/home/682.htm
• Professional Development Opportunities - http://sdea.org/home/707.htm
• SLO Repository - http://sdea.org/home/sdeaslorepository.htm
SD DOE Website
• http://doe.sd.gov/secretary/TE.aspx
State-Paid Professional Development
• http://doe.sd.gov/secretary/documents/doepdopts1.pdf
Teachscape - Updates
Dashboard
Evaluation Plans
• Teacher Evaluation Plan
• Non-Evaluation Year Plan (SLO-Only Plan)
• School Specialist Plans and Rubrics
• Principal Evaluation Plan (coming soon)
Contact Information
Contact Information
Matt Gill• [email protected]• 605-773-8193
Tammy Meyer• [email protected]
Robin Curtis• [email protected]