11
Special assignment, OFES, USA 1 ITER, Cadarache, January 26, 2007 ITER, Cadarache, January 26, 2007 Clement Wong, General Atomics, USA Clement Wong, General Atomics, USA Valery Chuyanov, Valery Chuyanov, Chang Shuk Kim, Chang Shuk Kim, at this time the only TBM engineer at this time the only TBM engineer Alessandro Tesini, Alessandro Tesini, the remote handling manager the remote handling manager Markus Iseli, Markus Iseli, Kimihiro Ioki, Kimihiro Ioki, replaced by Michael Pick replaced by Michael Pick Manfred Glugla, Jerry Sovka, ITER Manfred Glugla, Jerry Sovka, ITER Otto Bede, KFKI-RMKI, Hungary, Otto Bede, KFKI-RMKI, Hungary, generated the AEU generated the AEU drawings drawings most likely has left Cadarache most likely has left Cadarache TBM Facility Requirements in ITER and Estimated Cost ‘A very preliminary assessment’ September 07 IO action items background, by C. Won

TBM Facility Requirements in ITER and Estimated Cost ‘A very preliminary assessment’

  • Upload
    joella

  • View
    20

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

September 07 IO action items background, by C. Wong. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: TBM Facility Requirements in ITER and Estimated Cost ‘A very preliminary assessment’

Special assignment, OFES, USA1

ITER, Cadarache, January 26, 2007ITER, Cadarache, January 26, 2007

Clement Wong, General Atomics, USAClement Wong, General Atomics, USAValery Chuyanov, Valery Chuyanov,

Chang Shuk Kim, Chang Shuk Kim, at this time the only TBM engineerat this time the only TBM engineerAlessandro Tesini, Alessandro Tesini, the remote handling managerthe remote handling manager

Markus Iseli, Markus Iseli, Kimihiro Ioki, Kimihiro Ioki, replaced by Michael Pickreplaced by Michael Pick

Manfred Glugla, Jerry Sovka, ITERManfred Glugla, Jerry Sovka, ITEROtto Bede, KFKI-RMKI, Hungary, Otto Bede, KFKI-RMKI, Hungary, generated the AEU drawingsgenerated the AEU drawings

most likely has left Cadarache most likely has left Cadarache

TBM Facility Requirements in ITER

and Estimated Cost‘A very preliminary assessment’

September 07 IO action items background, by C. Wong

Page 2: TBM Facility Requirements in ITER and Estimated Cost ‘A very preliminary assessment’

footer text, location, date2

Three Interface Areas Three Interface Areas +tritium area a total of 4 areas+tritium area a total of 4 areas

Ancillary Equipment

1. Port Cell Area

2. Hot Cell Area

3. TCWS Area

EU HCPB helium system

TBM Port Plug

Cooling lines

Page 3: TBM Facility Requirements in ITER and Estimated Cost ‘A very preliminary assessment’

footer text, location, date3

1. Port Cell Area: replacement of TBM1. Port Cell Area: replacement of TBM

TBM Removal:

Step 1: Disconnect port plug and ancillary equipment, move AEU awayStep 2: Bring in transfer cask and extract port plug and move it to hot cellStep 3: Move and insert port plug into the hot cell “red zone”

TBM Return:

Step 4: Test of TBM and ancillary equipment at the hot cell areaStep 5: Disconnect utilities and put port plug on the transfer cask and move it to the port cell Step 6: Insert TBM, take transfer cask away and reconnect TBM with the ancillary equipment

AEU & transport TBM transfer cask

Cutting and re-weldingof PbLi pipes on the AEwill be done in a tent

Hot cell area

Mainly for the purpose of cost estimate, transfer cask to be supplied by IO

Page 4: TBM Facility Requirements in ITER and Estimated Cost ‘A very preliminary assessment’

footer text, location, date4

2. Hot Cell Area2. Hot Cell Area

Utilities: e.g. AC/DC, water, high pressure helium, diagnostics…etc., for the testing of TBM and ancillary equipment

Needs additional

• Hot cell “red zone” windows and services• RH equipment• Hot cell area for ancillary equipment maintenance• Utilities for TBM and ancillary equipment tests

To be parked and Maintained here

AEU

Page 5: TBM Facility Requirements in ITER and Estimated Cost ‘A very preliminary assessment’

footer text, location, date5

TBM ExchangeTBM Exchange

• Since then at the TBWG-18 meeting, remote handling area presented the transport cask carrrying the tubes area and AEU

• EU group coordinated presentation with in-situ remote cutting and re-weld of tubes

• US presented a mostly hands-on port plug removal approach

• These are not only approaches and should be analyzed by parties

Page 6: TBM Facility Requirements in ITER and Estimated Cost ‘A very preliminary assessment’

footer text, location, date6

Page 7: TBM Facility Requirements in ITER and Estimated Cost ‘A very preliminary assessment’

footer text, location, date7

Page 8: TBM Facility Requirements in ITER and Estimated Cost ‘A very preliminary assessment’

footer text, location, date8

Page 9: TBM Facility Requirements in ITER and Estimated Cost ‘A very preliminary assessment’

footer text, location, date9

Page 10: TBM Facility Requirements in ITER and Estimated Cost ‘A very preliminary assessment’

footer text, location, date10

US suggestion: Moving the bioshield inwardand re-locate the interface 2 to next to the AEU between11 and 9

Page 11: TBM Facility Requirements in ITER and Estimated Cost ‘A very preliminary assessment’

footer text, location, date11

NextNext

• Action items from CS Kim