Upload
vuonghuong
View
217
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Taxation of ESOPs/ Sweat Equity
Ashesh Safi
5 November 2011
Contents
• Concept
• Objectives
• Types of ESOPs/ sweat equity
• Taxation of ESOPs/ sweat equity
• Taxation of SARs
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells2
• Taxation of SARs
• Case Studies
Concept
• ESOP/ sweat equity is a –
‒ right given to an employee
‒ to buy specified number of shares of employer company/ group
company
‒on a future date
‒
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
‒
‒at a pre-determined price (typically at a price prevailing at the time of
grant)
3
Objectives
• Retain, motivate and reward employees for their performance
• Link the interests of employees with the objectives of the company
• Link the interest of employees with that of the shareholders
• Tool for tax planning
• Non-cash compensation
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
• Non-cash compensation
4
Types of ESOPs / sweat equity
• ‘Employee Stock Purchase Plan’ or ‘Employee Stock Option Scheme’
‒Employee allows the employer to hold certain portion of his monthly
salary. The amount so accumulated is utilized to acquire shares at a
discounted value or otherwise at a future date.
• ‘Employee Stock Ownership Plan’
‒Employee is given the option to acquire shares of the company at a
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
‒Employee is given the option to acquire shares of the company at a
pre-determined price after a certain period, directly or indirectly through
a trust.
• ‘Employee Stock Purchase Scheme’
‒The company offers shares to an employee, as part of a public issue or
otherwise at a predetermined price.
5
Types of ESOPs / sweat equity…
• ‘Employee Stock Option Scheme’
‒The company grants option to its employees to buy a specified number
of shares at a specified price during a specified period.
• ‘Stock Appreciation Rights or Plans’
‒Employees are awarded stock equivalents at a pre-determined value.
After the stipulated period, employees are allowed to encash such
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
‒
After the stipulated period, employees are allowed to encash such
rights. This is also known as Phantom Equity Plan.
• ‘Sweat Equity’
‒Equity shares issued by the company to employees or directors at a
discount or for consideration other than cash for providing know-how or
making available rights in the nature of intellectual property rights or
value additions.
6
Events
Grant
• Grant of options under a plan or scheme of the company
Vesting
• The process by which an employee is given a right to apply for shares of the company against the option granted to him
• An application by an employee to the company for issue of shares
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
Exercise
• An application by an employee to the company for issue of shares against the option vested to him
Date of Allotment
• The date on which the underlying asset being shares are allotted to the employee
Sale
• Sale of shares allotted to the employee
7
Taxation of ESOPs
8
Taxation of ESOPs
• Following aspects need consideration from the perspective of taxation of
ESOPs:
‒Taxation in the hands of employee at the time of exercise and
subsequent sale of shares.
‒Obligations of the employer to withhold tax at source on the benefit
received by employee under ESOP scheme
‒
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
‒
received by employee under ESOP scheme
‒Deductibility of the perquisite element / cost of ESOP in the hands of
employer.
9
Taxation in the hands of employees
Legislative history:
• Phase I: Prior to 1 April 1999
‒No tax legislative procedures, so covered by general provisions and
considered as a taxable perquisite at the time of grant of options [Abbot
v. Philbin (44 ITR 144)]
‒Later on, CBDT stated that taxability would be in the year in which
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
‒Later on, CBDT stated that taxability would be in the year in which
option is exercised – four situations were examined [CBDT Circular No.
710 dated 24 July 1995]
• Phase II: Between 1 April 1999 to 31 March 2000
‒Finance Act, 1999 introduced provisions relating to taxation of ESOPs
[section 17(2)(iiia)]
‒Taxable as perquisite at the time of exercise of option
10
Taxation in the hands of employees…
• Phase III: Between 1 April 2000 to 31 March 2006
‒Amendment made vide Finance Act 2000 and 2001
‒Proviso was inserted in section 17(2)(iii) and clause (iiia) omitted
‒Scheme to be in accordance with guidelines issued by the Central
Government
‒
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
‒
‒Taxability shifted to the year of sale of shares
• Phase IV: 1 April 2006 to 31 March 2009
‒FBT provision introduced by Finance Act 2005
‒Taxable as fringe benefit
‒FBT payable by employer
11
Taxation in the hands of employees…
• Phase IV – Contd…
‒Valuation based on vesting date
‒Detailed Circular No. 9 dated 20 December 2007 issued explaining
provisions
‒Valuation guidelines prescribed in Rule 40C/ 40D
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
‒
• Phase V: 1 April 2009 onwards
‒FBT provisions omitted vide Finance Act (No. 2) 2009
‒Taxable as perquisite under section 17(2)(vi)
‒Taxable at the time of allotment and transfer of shares
‒Valuation guidelines prescribed in Rule 3(8)
12
Points of taxation for employees
Grant of Options
Vesting
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells13
Exercise of Options/ Allotment of shares
Sale of Shares
Taxable as
salary income
Taxable as
capital gain
Gain up to the date of exercise will be taxable as perquisite (on exercise of options). Gain
from the date of exercise till the date of sale will be taxed as capital gains
Taxation as salary income
At the time of exercise of options:
• As per section 17(2)(vi), value of any specified security or sweat equity
shares allotted or transferred free of cost or at concessional rate to the
employee is considered as taxable perquisite
• Securities covered:
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells14
Specified Security
• Securities as defined in 2(h) the Securities Contracts (Regulations) Act, 1956
• Securities offered under any ESOP plan or scheme
Sweat Equity Shares
• Shares issued by the employer at a discount or for consideration other than cash for providing know-how or making available rights in the nature of intellectual property rights or value additions
Taxation as capital gains
At the time of sale of shares:
• Capital gains arising at the time of sale of shares are taxable in the
hands of employees, either as long term or short term capital gains
(depending upon the period of holding of shares from the date of
exercise)
• Capital gains are to be computed as the difference between sale
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
• Capital gains are to be computed as the difference between sale
proceeds and FMV on the date of exercise of options [Section 49(2AA)]
15
Valuation methodology
• Value of the specified security or sweat equity shall be determined as
follows:
‒Fair Market Value (‘FMV’) on the date of exercise less the amount
actually recovered from the employee
• FMV of the specified security or sweat equity shall be determined in
accordance with Rule 3(8) of the Income-tax Rules:
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
accordance with Rule 3(8) of the Income-tax Rules:
16
Unlisted shares
(a) Unlisted shares FMV shall be the value as determined by a Category I merchant banker registered with Securities and Exchange Board of India on the exercise date or 180 days prior to such date
Valuation methodology…
Shares listed on a stock exchange in India
(a) Shares traded on the date of exercise
Average of the opening and closing price on the date of exercise of option
(b) Shares not traded on the date of exercise
Closing price on a date closest to the date of exercise of the option and immediately preceding such date
Shares listed on more than one stock exchange
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells17
(a) Shares are traded on the date of exercise
Average of the opening and the closing price on the stock exchange, which records the highest volume of trading in shares on the date of exercise of option
(b) Shares are not traded on the date of exercise
Closing price on a date closest to the date of exercise of the option and immediately preceding such date on the stock exchange which records the highest volume of trading in shares
Obligations of the employer
• Employer is obliged to withhold taxes from the amount of perquisite arising to the employees due to exercise of stock options/ sweat equity
Withholding Tax
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
of stock options/ sweat equity
18
Issues relating to deductibility
Whether discount on market price of shares is deductible for corporate tax purposes?
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
is deductible for corporate tax purposes?
19
Issues relating to deductibility…
• As per CBDT Circular No. 9/2007 dated 20 December 2007 (during the
FBT regime) clarified the following:
− In case the employer purchases shares and then subsequently
transfers such shares to its employees, expenditure so incurred is
allowable as deduction in computing taxable income of the employer
company.
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
− If the shares are allotted to the employees from the share capital of
the company, no deduction is allowable in computing the taxable
income of the company since no expenditure has been incurred by
it.
20
Relevant case laws
• Mumbai ITAT in the case of VIP Industries Ltd. [2010 ITA No. 7242/
Mum/ 08] held that difference between market price and price at which
shares were allotted to employees could not be considered as a
revenue expenditure allowable under the Act
‒ No expenditure had been incurred by the taxpayer and a mere
receipt of lower amount could not be deemed as an expenditure.
‒
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
‒
‒ A short receipt of share premium was a notional loss and not actual
loss
‒ SEBI guidelines were not conclusive for allowing an expenditure
under the Act
21
Relevant case laws…
• Delhi ITAT in the case of Ranbaxy Industries [2009 026 TTJ 771] held
that difference between market price and price at which shares were
allotted to employees is non-deductible on account of the following
reasons:
− The difference between market price and grant price represents
share discount
−
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
− The amount is not an actual expenditure incurred by the tax payer
− SEBI guidelines are not a prerogative for determining allowability or
otherwise of an item for income tax purposes
22
Relevant case laws…
• Chennai ITAT in the case of M/s SSI Limited [I.T.A. NO. 1384/ MDS/
2004] held that difference between market price and price at which
shares were allotted to employees is deductible for tax purposes:
‒ It was a benefit conferred on the employee and a benefit, which could
not be taken back by the company.
‒ So far as the company is concerned, once the option is given and
‒
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
‒
exercised by the employee, liability in this behalf is ascertained.
‒ It is not the case of contingent liability depending upon various factors
on which the assessee had not control.
‒ Assessee’s claim of deduction was in accordance with the SEBI
guidelines.
‒ Hence, the amount is a deductible expenditure.
23
Taxation of Stock Appreciation Rights
(SARs)(SARs)
24
Taxation of SARs
• SARs differ from stock options
• In case of SARs, the employee does not have to pay for acquiring an
underlying security under the SARs scheme. The employee only receives
appreciation in the value of an underlying security.
• Upon exercise SARs provide only for cash payment and not for the issue
of shares.
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
• The exact quantum of benefit or reward is ascertained at the point of time
when SARs are redeemed. Whereas in the case of a stock option, the
benefit can be ascertained when shares are actually sold.
• SARs result in receipt of a reward, though measurable in terms of money
by which the share price has gone up. While ESOPs result in acquisition
of an asset at a concessional price by the beneficiary.
• Amount received on redemption of SARs is a revenue receipt, liable to
tax as income under the head ‘salaries’.
25
Taxation of SARs…
• Reference is made to the decision of Mumbai ITAT in the case of Sumit
Bhattacharya v. ACIT (2008) 300 ITR 347 wherein it was held that
redemption of SARs is quite different in scope and application as
compared to ESOPs. Further, the amount received on redemption of
SARs is a revenue receipt in the employee’s hands, liable to be taxed as
‘income from salaries’ even if received from ultimate parent company of
the employer.
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells26
Recent Judicial Precedents
27
Abhiram Seth v. JCIT (Delhi ITAT)
• Facts of the case
‒Assessee, an employee of M/s Pepsico India Holdings (P) Ltd. was
granted valuable rights in shares of Pepsico Inc. on various dates from
1995 to 2000
‒ESOP stocks were held with Barry Group of Merrill Lynch (Trust), USA
‒Assessee exercised and sold the shares on 25-02-2004 and offered the
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
‒
‒Assessee exercised and sold the shares on 25-02-2004 and offered the
gains to tax as long term capital gains
‒The relevant assessment year is 2004-05 (prior to FBT regime)
‒Assessee was required to pay purchase price at the time of sale of
shares. Therefore, the assessee actually received the differential
amount between gross sale consideration and cost price.
28
Abhiram Seth v. JCIT (Delhi ITAT)…
‒AO observed that as shares were allotted and sold by the assessee on
the same day, the profit arising should be taxable as short term capital
gain.
• Ruling of the ITAT
‒ ITAT held that when the assessee is given an option under the ESOP
scheme not to pay the purchase price of shares at the time of allotment,
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
‒
scheme not to pay the purchase price of shares at the time of allotment,
but the same is to be deducted at the time of sale of shares, the period
of holding of shares should be determined from the date of allotment of
shares. Just for the reason that purchase price is known on the date of
sale, gain arising from sale of shares cannot be held as short term
capital gain.
29
Case Studies
30
Case Study - 1
5 Options per employee 500 shares per option @ Rs. 10 per share
Date of grant of option 1 April 2006
Grant period 1 April 2006 to 31 March 2010
Date of vesting of option 1 April 2010
FMV on the date of vesting Rs. 25 per share
Date of exercise of option 30 March 2010
FMV on the date of exercise Rs. 22 per share
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells31
Issues:
‒ What are the taxing events?
‒ In which year will taxability arise?
‒ What would be the perquisite value in the hands of employee?
‒ What would be the taxable value?
‒ Whether gain will be short term or long term?
Date of allotment of shares 5 April 2010
FMV on the date of allotment Rs. 30 per share
Date of selling shares 1 January 2011
Selling price per share Rs. 50 per share
Case Study - 2
• Facts:
‒During FY 2007-08, Foreign Parent Company (F Co.) granted ESOPs
to an employee of Indian Company (I Co.)
‒The employee was seconded to F Co. w.e.f. 1 December 2007 for 3
years
‒The employee exercised ESOPs on 1 January 2008 (or 1 July 2009)
‒
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
‒
‒The employee became non-resident in India during FY 2008-09
‒The cost of ESOPs is not recharged to I Co.
• Issues:
‒Taxability of ESOPs in the hands of the employee in India
‒Whether full value or value in proportion to the period of service
rendered in India shall be taxable in India?
32
Case Study - 3
• Facts:
‒X is an employee of Foreign Company (F Co.)
‒At the time of grant of options, X is in employment of F.Co. outside India
‒Options to vest after 3 years
‒X is seconded to Indian group company for a period of 2 years, after 2
years of the grant of option
‒
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
‒
years of the grant of option
‒Option has to be exercised within 2 years from the date of vesting
‒At the time of vesting, X is in India
‒X exercises the option after completion of secondment in India
• Issues:
‒Taxability of ESOPs in the hands of X in India
33
Case Study – 4 (SARs)
• Facts:
‒X worked as an employee (Director) in an Indian Company (I Co.),
during the period November 2008 to November 2010.
‒Since December 2010, he is working with the Foreign Parent Company
(F Co.) of I Co.
‒During his employment in India, in November 2010, he was granted
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
‒During his employment in India, in November 2010, he was granted
800 SARs with vesting period up to September 2013, under a Stock
Option Plan of F Co.
‒SARs were granted for the period FY 2009-10 and related to the
services rendered by X in India.
‒Since the payment for SARs granted to X relates to services rendered
in India, the said cost will recharged to I Co.
34
Case Study – 4 (SARs)
‒X exercised the SARs in August 2011 i.e. during his employment with F
Co.
• Issues:
‒Whether payment received by X on exercise of SARs will be taxable in
India?
‒Withholding tax obligation on I Co. or F Co.?
‒
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
‒Withholding tax obligation on I Co. or F Co.?
‒Deductibility of cost recharged in the hands of I Co.
35
Case Study – 5
• Facts:
‒ Parent Indian company (I Co.) has
many foreign subsidiaries (F Co.)
‒ I Co. has employees posted
outside India
‒ Such employees remain on the
payroll of I Co.
‒ I Co. awards ESOPs to its
F Co. F Co.
F Co.F Co.
Posted in
F Co.
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
‒
‒ I Co. awards ESOPs to its
employees including those posted
outside India
‒ Cost incurred by I Co. on award of
ESOPs to employees posted
outside India, is borne by F Co. i.e.
recharge of cost by I Co. on F Co.
‒ Cost consists of cost of shares and
other administration cost
36
I Co.
SubsidiariesRecharge of
ESOP Cost
Grant of
ESOPs
Employment
contract
Case Study – 5 (contd.)
• Issues:
‒ Taxability of ESOPs in the hands of employees working in F Co.
‒ Taxability of ESOPs in the hands of employees working in India
‒ Deductibility of cost of ESOPs in the hands of I Co.
‒ Taxability of recovery of cost in the hands of I Co.
‒
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
‒
‒ Taxability of recovery of cost in the hands of I Co.
‒ Deductibility of cost recharged in the hands of F Co.
37
Case Study – 6
• Facts:
‒ Parent Indian company (I Co.) has
many foreign subsidiaries (F Co.)
‒ I Co. awards ESOPs to employees of
F Co.
‒ Cost incurred by I Co. on award of
F Co.
SubsidiarieRecharge
of ESOP
F Co.
F Co.F Co.
Grant of
Employee
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
‒ Cost incurred by I Co. on award of
ESOPs is borne by F Co. i.e.
recharge of cost by I Co. on F Co.
‒ Cost consists of cost of shares and
other administration cost
38
I Co.
Subsidiarie
sof ESOP
Cost
Grant of
ESOPs
Case Study – 6 (contd.)
• Issues:
‒ Taxability of ESOPs in the hands of employees of F Co.
‒ Deductibility of cost of ESOPs in the hands of I Co.
‒ Taxability of recovery of cost in the hands of I Co.
‒ Deductibility of cost recharged in the hands of F Co.
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
‒
‒ Deductibility of cost recharged in the hands of F Co.
39
Case Study – 7
• Facts:
‒ Parent Foreign Company (F Co.) has
subsidiary Company in India (I Co.)
‒ F Co. has employees posted in India
‒ Such employees remain on the
payroll of F Co.
‒ F Co. awards ESOPs to its
employees including those posted in
‒
F Co.
Recharge
Employment
contract
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
‒
employees including those posted in
India
‒ Cost incurred by F Co. on giving
ESOPs to employees working in
India is borne by I Co. i.e. recharge
of cost by F Co. on I Co.
‒ Cost consists of cost of shares and
other administration cost
40
I Co.
SubsidiaryRecharge
of ESOP
CostGrant of
ESOPs
Posted in
I Co.
Employee
Case Study – 7 (contd.)
• Issues:
‒ Taxability of ESOPs in the hands of employees deputed to I Co.
‒Withholding tax obligation on I Co. or F Co.?
‒ Deductibility of cost of ESOPs in the hands of F Co.
‒ Taxability of recovery of cost in the hands of F Co.
‒
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
‒
‒ Deductibility of cost recharged in the hands of I Co.
‒Withholding tax liability on cost recharged by I Co. to F Co.
41
Case Study – 8
• Facts:
‒ Parent Foreign Company (F Co.) has
subsidiary Indian Company (I Co.)
‒ ESOP scheme under which option is
granted to employee A in 2008
‒ Employee A is seconded to India for
a period of 2 years beginning
November 2010
‒
F Co.
Grant of
ESOPs
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
‒
November 2010
‒ Employee A exercises the option in
March 2011
‒ Cost incurred by F Co. on award of
ESOP is borne by I Co. i.e. recharge
of cost by F Co. on I Co.
‒ Cost consists of cost of shares and
other administration cost
42
I Co.
Subsidiary Recharge
of ESOP
Cost
Employment
contract with I Co.
Employee
Case Study – 8 (contd.)
• Issues:
‒ Taxability of ESOP in the hands of employee A
‒ Deductibility of cost of ESOP in the hands of I Co.
‒ Taxability of recovery of cost in the hands of F Co.
‒Withholding tax liability on I Co. to F Co.
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
‒
‒Withholding tax liability on I Co. to F Co.
43
Case Study – 9
• Facts
‒ Employee A is exercises options granted to him, in November 2010
‒ Cost of shares recovered from him is Rs. 10
‒ FMV on the date of exercise as per Merchant Banker Report is Rs. 20
‒ Valuation of shares under the provisions of section 56(2)(vii) is Rs. 25
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
‒
‒ Valuation of shares under the provisions of section 56(2)(vii) is Rs. 25
• Issues:
‒What will be the taxable value in the hands of employee A?
44
Questions
© 2011 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
This material prepared by Deloitte Haskins & Sells (DHS) is intended to provide general information on a particular subject or subjects and are not
an exhaustive treatment of such subject(s). Further, the views and opinions expressed herein are the subjective views and opinions of DHS based
on such parameters and analyses which in its opinion are relevant to the subject.
Accordingly, the information in this material is not intended to constitute accounting, tax, legal, investment, consulting, or other professional advice
or services. The information is not intended to be relied upon as the sole basis for any decision which may affect you or your business. Before
making any decision or taking any action that might affect your personal finances or business, you should consult a qualified professional adviser.
Neither DHS nor its affiliates shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies on this material.