Tax2 Cases 2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 Tax2 Cases 2

    1/87

    1

    INTEREST INCOME

    [G.R. No. 54908. January 22, 1990.]

    COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,petitioner,vs.MITSUBISHI METAL CORPORATION,

    ATLAS CONSOLIDATED MINING AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION and the COURT OF TAX

    APPEALS,respondents.

    [G.R. No. 80041. January 22, 1990.]COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,petitioner,vs.MITSUBISHI METAL CORPORATION,

    ATLAS CONSOLIDATED MINING AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION and the COURT OF TAX

    APPEALS,respondents.

    Gadioma Law Officesfor respondents.

    SYLLABUS

    1. REMEDIAL LAW; APPEAL; FINDINGS OF FACT OF COURT OF APPEALS RESPECTED; EXCEPTION. We

    have ruled that findings of fact of the Court of Tax Appeals are entitled to the highest respect and can only

    be disturbed on appeal if they are not supported by substantial evidence or if there is a showing of gross

    error or abuse on the part of the tax court.

    2. ID.; ID.; ID.; ID.; CASE AT BAR. Ordinarily, we could give due consideration to the holding of

    respondent court that Mitsubishi is a mere agent of Eximbank. Compelling circumstances obtaining and

    proven in these cases, however, warrant a departure from said general rule, since we are convinced that

    there is a misapprehension of facts on the part of the tax court to the extent that its conclusions are

    speculative in nature.

    3. TAXATION; EXEMPTION THEREFROM; STRICTLY CONSTRUED.It is too settled a rule in this

    jurisdiction, as to dispense with the need for citations, that laws granting exemption from tax are

    construed strictissimi jurisagainst the taxpayer and liberally in favor of the taxing power. Taxation is the

    rule and exemption is the exception. The burden of proof rests upon the party claiming exemption to provethat it is in fact covered by the exemption so claimed.

    4. ID.; ID.; SECTION 29(b) (7) (4) OF THE TAX CODE; CASE AT BAR NOT COVERED. The principal issue

    in both petitions is whether or not the interest income from the loans extended to Atlas by Mitsubishi is

    excludible from gross income taxation pursuant to Section 29 (b) (7) (A) of the tax code and, therefore,

    exempt from withholding tax. Apropos thereto, the focal question is whether or not Mitsubishi is a mere

    conduit of Eximbank which will then be considered as the creditor whose investments in the Philippines on

    loans are exempt from taxes under the code. The loan and sales contract between Mitsubishi and Atlas

    does not contain any direct or inferential reference to Eximbank whatsoever. The agreement is strictly

    between Mitsubishi as creditor in the contract of loan and Atlas as the seller of the copper concentrates.

    From the categorical language used in the document, one prestation was in consideration of the other. Thespecific terms and the reciprocal nature of their obligations make it implausible, if not vacuous, to give

    credit to the cavalier assertion that Mitsubishi was a mere agent in said transaction. Surely, Eximbank had

    nothing to do with the sale of the copper concentrates since all that Mitsubishi stated in its loan application

    with the former was that the amount being procured would be used as a loan to and in consideration for

    importing copper concentrates from Atlas. Such an innocuous statement of purpose could not have been

    intended for, nor could it legally constitute, a contract of agency. If that had been the purpose as

    respondent court believes, said corporations would have specifically so stated, especially considering their

    experience and expertise in financial transactions, not to speak of the amount involved and its purchasing

    value in 1970. Respondents postulate that Mitsubishi had to be a conduit because Eximbank's charter

  • 8/10/2019 Tax2 Cases 2

    2/87

    2

    prevents it from making loans except to Japanese individuals and corporations. We are not impressed. Not

    only is there a failure to establish such submission by adequate evidence but it posits the unfair and

    unexplained imputation that, for reasons subject only of surmise, said financing institution would

    deliberately circumvent its own charter to accommodate an alien borrower through a manipulated

    subterfuge, but with it as a principal and the real obligee. Definitely, the taxability of a party cannot be

    blandly glossed over on the basis of a supposed "broad, pragmatic analysis" alone without substantial

    supportive evidence, lest governmental operations suffer due to diminution of much needed funds. Nor can

    we close this discussion without taking cognizance of petitioner's warning, of pervasive relevance at thistime, that while international comity is invoked in this case on the nebulous representation that the funds

    involved in the loans are those of a foreign government, scrupulous care must be taken to avoid opening

    the floodgates to the violation of our tax laws. Otherwise, the mere expedient of having a Philippine

    corporation enter into a contract for loans or other domestic securities with private foreign entities, which in

    turn will negotiate independently with their governments, could be availed of to take advantage of the tax

    exemption law under discussion.

    D E C I S I O N

    REGALADO, J p:

    These cases, involving the same issue being contested by the same parties and having originated from thesame factual antecedents generating the claims for tax credit of private respondents, the same were

    consolidated by resolution of this Court dated May 31, 1989 and are jointly decided herein.

    The records reflect that on April 17,1970, Atlas Consolidated Mining and Development Corporation

    (hereinafter, Atlas) entered into a Loan and Sales Contract with Mitsubishi Metal Corporation (Mitsubishi, for

    brevity), a Japanese corporation licensed to engage in business in the Philippines, for purposes of the

    projected expansion of the productive capacity of the former's mines in Toledo, Cebu. Under said contract,

    Mitsubishi agreed to extend a loan to Atlas in the amount of $20,000,000.00, United States currency, for

    the installation of a new concentrator for copper production. Atlas, in turn, undertook to sell to Mitsubishi

    all the copper concentrates produced from said machine for a period of fifteen (15) years. It was

    contemplated that $9,000,000.00 of said loan was to be used for the purchase of the concentratormachinery from Japan.1

    Mitsubishi thereafter applied for a loan with the Export-Import Bank of Japan (Eximbank, for short)

    obviously for purposes of its obligation under said contract. Its loan application was approved on May 26,

    1970 in the sum of Y4,320,000,000.00, at about the same time as the approval of its loan for

    Y2,880,000,000.00 from a consortium of Japanese banks. The total amount of both loans is equivalent to

    $20,000,000.00 in United States currency at the then prevailing exchange rate. The records in the Bureau

    of Internal Revenue show that the approval of the loan by Eximbank to Mitsubishi was subject to the

    condition that Mitsubishi would use the amount as a loan to Atlas and as a consideration for importing

    copper concentrates from Atlas, and that Mitsubishi had to pay back the total amount of loan by September

    30, 1981.2

    Pursuant to the contract between Atlas and Mitsubishi, interest payments were made by the former to the

    latter totalling P13,143,966.79 for the years 1974 and 1975. The corresponding 15% tax thereon in the

    amount of P1,971,595.01 was withheld pursuant to Section 24 (b) (1) and Section 53 (b) (2) of the

    National Internal Revenue Code, as amended by Presidential Decree No. 131, and duly remitted to the

    Government.3

    On March 5, 1976, private respondents filed a claim for tax credit requesting that the sum of P1,971,595.01

    be applied against their existing and future tax liabilities. Parenthetically, it was later noted by respondent

    http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote1_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote1_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote1_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote2_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote2_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote2_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote3_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote3_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote3_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote3_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote2_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote1_0
  • 8/10/2019 Tax2 Cases 2

    3/87

    3

    Court of Tax Appeals in its decision that on August 27, 1976, Mitsubishi executed a waiver and disclaimer of

    its interest in the claim for tax credit in favor of Atlas.4

    The petitioner not having acted on the claim for tax credit, on April 23, 1976 private respondents filed a

    petition for review with respondent court, docketed therein as CTA Case No. 2801.5The petition was

    grounded on the claim that Mitsubishi was a mere agent of Eximbank, which is a financing institution

    owned, controlled and financed by the Japanese Government. Such governmental status of Eximbank, if it

    may be so called, is the basis for private respondents' claim for exemption from paying the tax on the

    interest payments on the loan as earlier stated. It was further claimed that the interest payments on the

    loan from the consortium of Japanese banks were likewise exempt because said loan supposedly came

    from or were financed by Eximbank. The provision of the National Internal Revenue Code relied upon

    is Section 29 (b) (7) (A),6which excludes from gross income:

    "(A) Income received from their investments in the Philippines in loans, stocks, bonds or other domestic

    securities, or from interest on their deposits in banks in the Philippines by (1) foreign governments, (2)

    financing institutions owned, controlled, or enjoying refinancing from them, and (3) international or regional

    financing institutions established by governments."

    Petitioner filed an answer on July 9, 1976. The case was set for hearing on April 16, 1977 but was later

    reset upon manifestation of petitioner that the claim for tax credit of the alleged erroneous payment wasstill being reviewed by the Appellate Division of the Bureau of Internal Revenue. The records show that on

    November 16, 1976, the said division recommended to petitioner the approval of private respondent's

    claim. However, before action could be taken thereon, respondent court scheduled the case for hearing on

    September 30, 1977, during which trial private respondents presented their evidence while petitioner

    submitted his case on the basis of the records of the Bureau of Internal Revenue and the pleadings.7

    On April 18, 1980, respondent court promulgated its decision ordering petitioner to grant a tax credit in

    favor of Atlas in the amount of P1,971,595.01. Interestingly, the tax court held that petitioner admitted the

    material averments of private respondents when he supposedly prayed "for judgment on the pleadings

    without offering proof as to the truth of his allegations."8Furthermore, the court declared that all papers

    and documents pertaining to the loan of Y4,320,000,000.00 obtained by Mitsubishi from Eximbank's showthat this was the same amount given to Atlas. It also observed that the money for the loans from the

    consortium of private Japanese banks in the sum of Y2,880,000,000.00 "originated" from Eximbank. From

    these, respondent court concluded that the ultimate creditor of Atlas was Eximbank with Mitsubishi acting

    as a mere "arranger or conduit through which the loans flowed from the creditor Export-Import Bank of

    Japan to the debtor Atlas Consolidated Mining & Development Corporation."9

    A motion for reconsideration having been denied on August 20, 1980, petitioner interposed an appeal to

    this Court, docketed herein as G.R. No. 54908.

    While CTA Case No. 2801 was still pending before the tax court, the corresponding 15% tax on the amount

    of P439,167.95 on the P2,927,789.06 interest payments for the years 1977 and 1978 was withheld and

    remitted to the Government. Atlas again filed a claim for tax credit with the petitioner, repeating the same

    basis for exemption.

    On June 25, 1979, Mitsubishi and Atlas filed a petition for review with the Court of Tax Appeals docketed as

    CTA Case No. 3015. Petitioner filed his answer thereto on August 14, 1979, and, in a letter to private

    respondents dated November 12, 1979, denied said claim for tax credit for lack of factual or legal basis.10

    On January 15, 1981, relying on its prior ruling in CTA Case No. 2801, respondent court rendered judgment

    ordering the petitioner to credit Atlas the aforesaid amount of tax paid. A motion for reconsideration, filed

    on March 10, 1981, was denied by respondent court in a resolution dated September 7, 1987. A notice of

    http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote4_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote4_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote4_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote5_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote5_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote5_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote6_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote6_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote6_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote7_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote7_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote7_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote8_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote8_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote8_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote9_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote9_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote9_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote10_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote10_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote10_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote10_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote9_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote8_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote7_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote6_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote5_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote4_0
  • 8/10/2019 Tax2 Cases 2

    4/87

    4

    appeal was filed on September 22, 1987 by petitioner with respondent court and a petition for review was

    filed with this Court on December 19, 1987. Said later case is now before us as G.R. No. 80041 and is

    consolidated with G.R. No. 54908.

    The principal issue in both petitions is whether or not the interest income from the loans extended to Atlas

    by Mitsubishi is excludible from gross income taxation pursuant to Section 29 (b) (7) (A) of the tax code

    and, therefore, exempt from withholding tax. Apropos thereto, the focal question is whether or not

    Mitsubishi is a mere conduit of Eximbank which will then be considered as the creditor whose investments

    in the Philippines on loans are exempt from taxes under the code.

    Prefatorily, it must be noted that respondent court erred in holding in CTA Case No. 2801 that petitioner

    should be deemed to have admitted the allegations of the private respondents when it submitted the case

    on the basis of the pleadings and records of the bureau. There is nothing to indicate such admission on the

    part of petitioner nor can we accept respondent court's pronouncement that petitioner did not offer to

    prove the truth of its allegations. The records of the Bureau of Internal Revenue relevant to the case were

    duly submitted and admitted as petitioner's supporting evidence. Additionally, a hearing was conducted,

    with presentation of evidence, and the findings of respondent court were based not only on the pleadings

    but on the evidence adduced by the parties. There could, therefore, not have been a judgment on the

    pleadings, with the theorized admissions imputed to petitioner, as mistakenly held by respondent court.

    Time and again, we have ruled that findings of fact of the Court of Tax Appeals are entitled to the highest

    respect and can only be disturbed on appeal if they are not supported by substantial evidence or if there is

    a showing of gross error or abuse on the part of the tax court.11Thus, ordinarily, we could give due

    consideration to the holding of respondent court that Mitsubishi is a mere agent of Eximbank. Compelling

    circumstances obtaining and proven in these cases, however, warrant a departure from said general rule,

    since we are convinced that there is a misapprehension of facts on the part of the tax court to the extent

    that its conclusions are speculative in nature.

    The loan and sales contract between Mitsubishi and Atlas does not contain any direct or inferential

    reference to Eximbank whatsoever. The agreement is strictly between Mitsubishi as creditor in the contract

    of loan and Atlas as the seller of the copper concentrates. From the categorical language used in thedocument, one prestation was in consideration of the other. The specific terms and the reciprocal nature of

    their obligations make it implausible, if not vacuous, to give credit to the cavalier assertion that Mitsubishi

    was a mere agent in said transaction.

    Surely, Eximbank had nothing to do with the sale of the copper concentrates since all that Mitsubishi stated

    in its loan application with the former was that the amount being procured would be used as a loan to and

    in consideration for importing copper concentrates from Atlas.12Such an innocuous statement of purpose

    could not have been intended for, nor could it legally constitute, a contract of agency. If that had been the

    purpose as respondent court believes, said corporations would have specifically so stated, especially

    considering their experience and expertise in financial transactions, not to speak of the amount involved

    and its purchasing value in 1970.

    A thorough analysis of the factual and legal ambience of these eases impels us to give weight to the

    following arguments of petitioner:

    "The nature of the above contract shows that the same is not just a simple contract of loan. It is not a

    mere creditor-debtor relationship. It is more of a reciprocal obligation between ATLAS and MITSUBISHI

    where the latter shall provide the funds in the installation of a new concentrator at the former's Toledo

    mines in Cebu, while ATLAS in consideration of which, shall sell to MITSUBISHI, for a term of 15 years, the

    entire copper concentrate that will be produced by the installed concentrator.

    http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote11_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote11_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote11_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote12_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote12_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote12_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote12_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote11_0
  • 8/10/2019 Tax2 Cases 2

    5/87

    5

    "Suffice it to say, the selling of the copper concentrate to MITSUBISHI within the specified term was the

    consideration of the granting of the amount of $20 million to ATLAS. MITSUBISHI, in order to fulfill its part

    of the contract, had to obtain funds. Hence, it had to secure a loan or loans from other sources. And from

    what sources, it is immaterial as far as ATLAS in concerned. In this case, MITSUBISHI obtained the $20

    million from the EXIMBANK of Japan and the consortium of Japanese banks financed through the

    EXIMBANK of Japan.

    "When MITSUBISHI therefore secured such loans, it was in its own independent capacity as a private entity

    and not as a conduit of the consortium of Japanese banks or the EXIMBANK of Japan. While the loans were

    secured by MITSUBISHI primarily 'as a loan to and in consideration for importing copper concentrates from

    ATLAS,' the fact remains that it was a loan by EXIMBANK of Japan to MITSUBISHI and not to ATLAS.

    "Thus, the transaction between MITSUBISHI and EXIMBANK of Japan was a distinct and separate contract

    from that entered into by MITSUBISHI and ATLAS. Surely, in the latter contract, it is not EXIMBANK that

    was intended to be benefited. It is MITSUBISHI which stood to profit. Besides, the Loan and Sales Contract

    cannot be any clearer. The only signatories to the same were MITSUBISHI and ATLAS. Nowhere in the

    contract can it be inferred that MITSUBISHI acted for and in behalf of EXIMBANK of Japan nor of any

    entity, private or public, for that matter.

    "Corollary to this, it may well be stated that in this jurisdiction, well-settled is the rule that when a contractof loan is completed, the money ceases to be the property of the former owner and becomes the sole

    property of the obligor (Tolentino and Manio vs. Gonzales Sy, 50 Phil. 558).

    "In the case at bar, when MITSUBISHI obtained the loan of $20 million from EXIMBANK of Japan, said

    amount ceased to be the property of the bank and became the property of MITSUBISHI.

    "The conclusion is indubitable: MITSUBISHI, and NOT EXIMBANK, is the sole creditor of ATLAS, the former

    being the owner of the $20 million upon completion of its loan contract with EXIMBANK of Japan.

    "The interest income of the loan paid by ATLAS to MITSUBISHI is therefore entirely different from the

    interest income paid by MITSUBISHI to EXIMBANK of Japan. What was the subject of the 15% withholding

    tax is not the interest income paid by MITSUBISHI to EXIMBANK but the interest income earned byMITSUBISHI from the loan to ATLAS. . . . "13

    To repeat, the contract between Eximbank and Mitsubishi is entirely different. It is complete in itself, does

    not appear to be suppletory or collateral to another contract and is, therefore, not to be distorted by other

    considerations aliunde.The application for the loan was approved on May 20, 1970, or more than a month

    after the contract between Mitsubishi and Atlas was entered into on April 17, 1970. It is true that under the

    contract of loan with Eximbank, Mitsubishi agreed to use the amount as a loan to and in consideration for

    importing copper concentrates from Atlas, but all that this proves is the justification for the loan as

    represented by Mitsubishi, a standard banking practice for evaluating the prospects of due repayment.

    There is nothing wrong with such stipulation as the parties in a contract are free to agree on such lawful

    terms and conditions as they see fit. Limiting the disbursement of the amount borrowed to a certain personor to a certain purpose is not unusual, especially in the case of Eximbank which, aside from protecting its

    financial exposure, must see to it that the same are in line with the provisions and objectives of its charter.

    Respondents postulate that Mitsubishi had to be a conduit because Eximbank's charter prevents it from

    making loans except to Japanese individuals and corporations. We are not impressed. Not only is there a

    failure to establish such submission by adequate evidence but it posits the unfair and unexplained

    imputation that, for reasons subject only of surmise, said financing institution would deliberately circumvent

    its own charter to accommodate an alien borrower through a manipulated subterfuge, but with it as a

    principal and the real obligee.

    http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote13_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote13_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote13_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote13_0
  • 8/10/2019 Tax2 Cases 2

    6/87

    6

    The allegation that the interest paid by Atlas was remitted in full by Mitsubishi to Eximbank, assuming the

    truth thereof, is too tenuous and conjectural to support the proposition that Mitsubishi is a mere conduit.

    Furthermore, the remittance of the interest payments may also be logically viewed as an arrangement in

    paying Mitsubishi's obligation to Eximbank. Whatever arrangement was agreed upon by Eximbank and

    Mitsubishi as to the manner or procedure for the payment of the latter's obligation is their own concern. It

    should also be noted that Eximbank's loan to Mitsubishi imposes interest at the rate of 75% per annum,

    while Mitsubishi's contract with Atlas merely states that the "interest on the amount of the loan shall be the

    actual cost beginning from and including other dates of releases against loan."14

    It is too settled a rule in this jurisdiction, as to dispense with the need for citations, that laws granting

    exemption from tax are construed strictissimi jurisagainst the taxpayer and liberally in favor of the taxing

    power. Taxation is the rule and exemption is the exception. The burden of proof rests upon the party

    claiming exemption to prove that it is in fact covered by the exemption so claimed, which onus petitioners

    have failed to discharge. Significantly, private respondents are not even among the entities which, under

    Section 29 (b) (7) (A) of the tax code, are entitled to exemption and which should indispensably be the

    party in interest in this case.

    Definitely, the taxability of a party cannot be blandly glossed over on the basis of a supposed "broad,

    pragmatic analysis" alone without substantial supportive evidence, lest governmental operations suffer due

    to diminution of much needed funds. Nor can we close this discussion without taking cognizance of

    petitioner's warning, of pervasive relevance at this time, that while international comity is invoked in this

    case on the nebulous representation that the funds involved in the loans are those of a foreign

    government, scrupulous care must be taken to avoid opening the floodgates to the violation of our tax

    laws. Otherwise, the mere expedient of having a Philippine corporation enter into a contract for loans or

    other domestic securities with private foreign entities, which in turn will negotiate independently with their

    governments, could be availed of to take advantage of the tax exemption law under discussion.

    WHEREFORE, the decisions of the Court of Tax Appeals in CTA Cases Nos. 2801 and 3015, dated April 18,

    1980 and January 15, 1981, respectively, are hereby REVERSED and SET ASIDE.

    SO ORDERED.

    |||(Commr. v. Mitsubishi Metal Corp., G.R. No. 54908, 80041, January 22, 1990)

    DIVIDENDS

    [G.R. No. 108576. January 20, 1999.]

    COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,petitioner, vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS, COURT OF

    TAX APPEALS and A. SORIANO CORP.,respondents.

    M. L. Gadioma Law Office for private respondent.

    The Solicitor General for petitioner.

    SYNOPSIS

    Don Andres Soriano, a citizen and resident of the United States formed in the 1930's the corporation "A

    Soriano Y Cia," predecessor of ANSCOR. On December 30, 1964 Don Andres died. On June 30, 1968,

    pursuant to a Board Resolution, ANSCOR redeemed 28,000 common shares from Don Andres' estate. By

    November 1968, the Board further increased ANSCOR's capital stock to P75M divided into 150,000

    preferred shares and 600,000 common shares. About a year later ANSCOR again redeemed 80,000

    http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote14_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote14_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote14_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/19386?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19386&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55410&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=19883&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=10008&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=9711&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=58145&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=55692&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=12543&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=54908&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote14_0
  • 8/10/2019 Tax2 Cases 2

    7/87

    7

    common shares from Don Andres' estate, further reducing the latter's common shareholdings. ANSCOR's

    business purpose for both redemptions of stock is to partially retire said stocks as treasury shares in order

    to reduce the company's foreign exchange remittances in case cash dividends are declared. In 1973, after

    examining ANSCOR's books of account and records Revenue Examiners issued a report proposing that

    ANSCOR be assessed for deficiency withholding tax-at-source, pursuant to Sections 53 and 54 of the 1939

    Revenue Code for the year 1968 and the second quarter of 1969 based on the transactions of exchange

    and redemption of stocks. Subsequently, ANSCOR filed a petition for review with the Court of Tax Appeals

    assailing the tax assessments on the redemptions and exchange of stocks. In its decision, the CTA reversedthe BIR's ruling after finding sufficient evidence to overcome theprima faciecorrectness of the questioned

    assessments. In a petition for review, the Court of Appeals affirmed the ruling of the CTA. Hence, the

    present petition. The issue is whether ANSCOR's redemption of stocks from its stockholders as well as the

    exchange of common shares can be considered as equivalent to the distribution of taxable dividend making

    the proceeds thereof taxable under the provisions Section 83 (B) of the 1939 Revenue Act.

    The Supreme Court modified the decision of the Court of Appeals in that ANSCOR'S redemption of 82,752.5

    stock dividends is herein considered as essentially equivalent to a distribution of taxable dividends for which

    it is liable for the withholding tax-at-source. While the Board Resolutions authorizing the redemptions state

    only one purpose reduction of foreign exchange remittances in case cash dividends are declared. Said

    purpose was not given credence by the court in case at bar. Records show that despite the existence ofenormous corporate profits no cash dividends were ever declared by ANSCOR from 1945 until the BIR

    started making assessments in the early 1970's. Although a corporation under certain exceptions, has the

    prerogative when to issue dividends, yet when no cash dividends are issued for about three decades, this

    circumstance negate the legitimacy of ANSCOR's alleged purposes. With regard to the exchange of shares,

    the Court ruled that the exchange of common with preferred shares is not taxable because it produces no

    realized income to the subscriber but only a modification of the subscriber's rights and privileges which is

    not a flow of wealth for tax purposes.

    SYLLABUS

    1.TAXATION; Presidential Decree No. 67; NOT BEING A TAXPAYER, A WITHHOLDING AGENT LIKE THE

    PRIVATE RESPONDENT IS NOT PROTECTED BY THE AMNESTY UNDER THE DECREE.

    An incometaxpayer covers all persons who derive taxable income. ANSCOR was assessed by petitioner for deficiency

    withholding tax under Section 53 and 54 of the 1939 Code. As such, it is being held liable in its capacity as

    a withholding agent and not in its personality as a taxpayer. In the operation of the withholding tax system,

    the withholding agent is the payor, a separate entity acting no more than an agent of the government for

    the collection of the tax in order to ensure its payments; the payer is the taxpayer he is the person

    subject to tax impose by law; and the payee is the taxing authority. In other words, the withholding agent

    is merely a tax collector, not a taxpayer. Under the withholding system, however, the agent-payor becomes

    a payee by fiction of law. His (agent) liability is direct and independent from the taxpayer, because the

    income tax is still impose on and due from the latter. The agent is not liable for the tax as no wealth flowed

    into him

    he earned no income. The Tax Code only makes the agent personally liable for the tax arisingfrom the breach of its legal duty to withhold as distinguish from its duty to pay tax since: "the government's

    cause of action against the withholding agent is not for the collection of income tax, but for the

    enforcement of the withholding provision of Section 53 of the Tax Code, compliance with which is imposed

    on the withholding agent and not upon the taxpayer." Not being a taxpayer, a withholding agent, like

    ANSCOR in this transaction is not protected by the amnesty under the decree. Codal provisions on

    withholding tax are mandatory and must be complied with by the withholding agent. The taxpayer should

    not answer for the non-performance by the withholding agent of its legal duty to withhold unless there is

    collusion or bad faith. The former could not be deemed to have evaded the tax had the withholding agent

    performed its duty. This could be the situation for which the amnesty decree was intended. Thus, to curtail

  • 8/10/2019 Tax2 Cases 2

    8/87

    8

    tax evasion and give tax evaders a chance to reform, it was deemed administratively feasible to grant tax

    amnesty in certain instances. In addition, a "tax amnesty, much like a tax exemption, is never favored nor

    presumed in law and if granted by a statute, the terms of the amnesty like that of a tax exemption must be

    construed strictly against the taxpayer and liberally in favor of the taxing authority." The rule on strictissimi

    jurisequally applies. So that, any doubt in the application of an amnesty law/decree should be resolved in

    favor of the taxing authority.

    2.ID.; NATIONAL INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1939; TAX ON STOCK DIVIDENDS; REDEMPTION AND

    CANCELLATION; PURPOSES INVOKED BY PRIVATE RESPONDENT CORPORATION, UNDER THE FACTS OF

    THE PRESENT CASE ARE NO EXCUSE FOR ITS TAX LIABILITY; REASON. First, the alleged "filipinization"

    plan cannot be considered legitimate as it was not implemented until the BIR started making assessments

    on the proceeds of the redemption. Such corporate plan was not stated in nor supported by any Board

    Resolution but a mere afterthought interposed by the counsel of ANSCOR. Being a separate entity, the

    corporation can act only through its Board of Directors. The Board Resolutions authorizing the redemptions

    state only one purpose reduction of foreign exchange remittances in case cash dividends are declared.

    Not even this purpose can be given credence. Records show that despite the existence of enormous

    corporate profits no cash dividend was ever declared by ANSCOR from 1945 until the BIR started making

    assessments in the early 1970's. Although a corporation under certain exceptions, has the prerogative when

    to issue dividends, yet when no cash dividends was issued for about three decades, this circumstancesnegates the legitimacy of ANSCOR's alleged purposes. Moreover, to issue stock dividends is to increase the

    shareholdings of ANSCOR's foreign stockholders contrary to its "filipinization" plan. This would also increase

    rather than reduce their need for foreign exchange remittances in case of cash dividend declaration,

    considering that ANSCOR is a family corporation where the majority shares at the time of redemptions were

    held by Don Andres' foreign heirs. Secondly, assuming arguendo, that those business purposes are

    legitimate, the same cannot be valid excuse for the imposition of tax. Otherwise, the taxpayer's liability to

    pay income tax would be made to depend upon a third person who did not earn the income being taxed.

    Furthermore, even if the said purposes support the redemption and justify the issuance of stock dividends,

    the same has no bearing whatsoever on the imposition of the tax herein assessed because the proceeds of

    the redemption are deemed taxable dividends since it was shown that income was generated therefrom.

    Thirdly, ANSCOR argued that to treat as 'taxable dividend' the proceeds of the redeemed stock dividendswould be to impose on such stock an undisclosed lien and would be extremely unfair to intervening

    purchasers, i.e. those who buys the stock dividends after their issuance. Such argument, however, bears no

    relevance in this case as no intervening buyer is involved. And even if there is an intervening buyer, it is

    necessary to look into the factual milieu of the case if income was realized from the transaction. Again, we

    reiterate that the dividend equivalence test depends on such "time and manner" of the transaction and its

    net effect. The undisclosed lien may be unfair to a subsequent stock buyer who has no capital interest in

    the company. But the unfairness may not be true to an original subscriber like Don Andres, who holds stock

    dividends as gains from his investments. The subsequent buyer who buys stock dividends is investing

    capital. It just so happen that what he bought is stock dividends. The effect of its (stock dividends)

    redemption from that subsequent buyer is merely to return his capital subscription, which is income if

    redeemed from the original subscriber. After considering the manner and the circumstances by which the

    issuance and redemption of stock dividends were made, there is no other conclusion but that the proceeds

    thereof are essentially considered equivalent to a distribution of taxable dividends. As "taxable dividend"

    under Section 83(b), it is part of the "entire income" subject to tax under Section 22 in relation to Section

    21 of the 1939 Code. Moreover, under Section 29(a) of said Code, dividends are included in "gross income."

    As income, it is subject to income tax which is required to be withheld at source. The 1997 Tax Code may

    have altered the situation but it does not change this disposition.

  • 8/10/2019 Tax2 Cases 2

    9/87

    9

    3.ID.; ID.; ID.; THE EXCHANGE OF COMMON WITH PREFERRED SHARES IN CASE AT BAR IS NOT

    TAXABLE; IT PRODUCES NO REALIZED INCOME TO THE SUBSCRIBER BUT ONLY A MODIFICATION OF

    THE SUBSCRIBER'S RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES WHICH IS NOT A FLOW OF WEALTH FOR TAX PURPOSES.

    Both the Tax Court and the Court of Appeals found that ANSCOR reclassifiedits shares into common and

    preferred, and that parts of the common shares of the Don Andres estate and all of Doa Carmen's shares

    were exchangedfor the whole 150,000 preferred shares. Thereafter, both the Don Andres estate and Doa

    Carmen remained as corporate subscribers except that their subscriptions now include preferred shares.

    There was no change in their proportional interest after the exchange. There was no cash flow. Both stockshad the same par value. Under the facts herein, any difference in their market value would be immaterial at

    the time of exchange because no income is yet realized it was a mere corporate paper transaction. It

    would have been different, if the exchange transaction resulted into a flow of wealth, in which case income

    tax may be imposed. Reclassification of shares does not always bring any substantial alteration in the

    subscriber's proportional interest. But the exchange is different there would be a shifting of the balance

    of stock features, like priority in dividend declarations or absence of voting rights. Yet neither the

    reclassification nor exchangeper se, yields realize income for tax purposes. A common stock represents the

    residual ownership interest in the corporation. It is a basic class of stock ordinarily and usually issued

    without extraordinary rights or privileges and entitles the shareholder to apro ratadivision of profits.

    Preferred stocks are those which entitle the shareholder to some priority on dividends and asset

    distribution. Both shares are part of the corporation's capital stock. Both stockholders are no different fromordinary investors who take on the same investment risks. Preferred and common shareholders participate

    in the same venture, willing to share in the profits and losses of the enterprise. Moreover, under the

    doctrine of equality of shares all stocks issued by the corporation are presumed equal with the same

    privileges and liabilities, provided that the Articles of Incorporation is silent on such differences. In this

    case, the exchange of shares, without more, produces no realized income to the subscriber. There is only a

    modification of the subscriber's rights and privileges which is not a flow of wealth for tax purposes. The

    issue of taxable dividend may arise only once a subscriber disposes of his entire interest and not when

    there is still maintenance of proprietary interest.

    D E C I S I O N

    MARTINEZ,J p:

    Petitioner Commissioner of Internal Revenue (CIR) seeks the reversal of the decision of the Court of

    Appeals (CA)1which affirmed the ruling of the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA)2that private respondent A.

    Soriano Corporation's (hereinafter ANSCOR) redemption and exchange of the stocks of its foreign

    stockholders cannot be considered as "essentially equivalent to a distribution of taxable dividends" under

    Section 83(b) of the 1939 Internal Revenue Act.3

    The undisputed facts are as follows:

    Sometime in the 1930s, Don Andres Soriano, a citizen and resident of the United States, formed the

    corporation "A. Soriano Y Cia", predecessor of ANSCOR, with a P1,000,000.00 capitalization divided into10,000 common shares at a par value of P100/share. ANSCOR is wholly owned and controlled by the family

    of Don Andres, who are all non-resident aliens.4In 1937, Don Andres subscribed to 4,963 shares of the

    5,000 shares originally issued.5

    On September 12, 1945, ANSCOR's authorized capital stock was increased to P2,500,000.00 divided into

    25,000 common shares with the same par value. Of the additional 15,000 shares, only 10,000 was issued

    which were all subscribed by Don Andres, after the other stockholders waived in favor of the former their

    pre-emptive rights to subscribe to the new issues.6This increased his subscription to 14,963 common

    http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/11851?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=11851&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=875&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=53003&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=500&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=56279&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=108576&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote1_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/11851?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=11851&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=875&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=53003&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=500&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=56279&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=108576&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote1_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/11851?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=11851&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=875&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=53003&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=500&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=56279&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=108576&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote1_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/11851?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=11851&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=875&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=53003&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=500&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=56279&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=108576&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&q%5Btitle%5D=&q%5Butf8%5D=%E2%9C%93&q%5Byear_end%5D=&q%5Byear_start%5D=#footnote2_0http://online.cdasia.com/jurisprudences/11851?hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=11851&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=875&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=53003&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=500&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&hits%5B%5D%5Bid%5D=56279&hits%5B%5D%5Btype%5D=Jurisprudence&path=%2Fjurisprudences%2Fsearch&q%5Bcitation_finder%5D=&q%5Bfull_text%5D=108576&q%5Bissue_no%5D=&q%5Bponente%5D=&q%5Bsyllabus%5D=&a