Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence PS 1.2a Hybrid Active-Passive Rotor Systems for...
If you can't read please download the document
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence PS 1.2a Hybrid Active-Passive Rotor Systems for Vibration and Performance Edward Smith Professor Aerospace
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence PS 1.2a Hybrid
Active-Passive Rotor Systems for Vibration and Performance Edward
Smith Professor Aerospace Engineering Tel : (814) 863-0966 Kon-Well
Wang Diefenderfer Chaired Professor Mechanical Engineering Tel :
(814) 865-2183 Principal Investigators Graduate Student Jun-Sik Kim
2005 RCOE Program Review May 2, 2005
Slide 2
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Background
vibrationThe rotorcraft industry is aggressively pursuing
successful and cost effective active control systems to reduce
vibration. Blade loadsBlade loads are design constraints for
primary control and life cycle. Actuator authorityActuator
authority present major technical barrier.
Slide 3
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Problem
Statement and Task Objective Design high authority actuator system
Large stroke and force and low electric power Design high authority
actuator system Large stroke and force and low electric power
hybrid design approach Penn State (1996 - ) improved actuators UMd,
PSU, et al. V gs V w/ control w/Control fs w/ control w/Control
Vibration Blade loads Design active controller together with
passive parameters Re-configuration of passive structure (m, GJ,
EI, etc) Design active controller together with passive parameters
Re-configuration of passive structure (m, GJ, EI, etc) Objective:
To address the critical issues and advance the state- of-the-art of
rotor vibration suppression and blade loads reduction through
combining the two approaches High authority PZT actuators Effective
hybrid vibration/blade loads control system How do we design
effective active vibration/blade loads control systems for future
rotorcraft ?
Slide 4
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Piezoelectric
Actuator Scaling Aerodynamic Moment and Block Torque non-
dimensionalized with small scale values H aero * ~ c 2 R T* ~ c 3
Performance as Blade Size 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 0510152025
Chord (in) H aero * T* Small scale blade chord MD900 blade chord 3
51 1 7 3 H aero * T*
Slide 5
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Boeing 2xFrame
Actuator 2003 Full Scale Whirl Test Results (SPIE 2004, Straub et.
al) Large rotor test stand (LRTS) Modified MD 900 bearingless rotor
3~3.5 degrees in hover (450V) Flap deflection vs. rotor speed
multiple
Slide 6
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence 1) High active
authority 1) High active authority and low electric power of
actuator for actuator/flap coupled systems Resonant Actuation
System (RAS) 2) Multiple trailing edge resonance actuation system
2) Multiple trailing edge flap configuration to utilize the
resonance actuation system Vibration and blade loads reductions
Technical Barriers and Solution Idea Resonance Actuation
System(RAS) Multiple Trailing Edge Flaps
Slide 7
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Technical
Evolution Natures Flight Actuators
Slide 8
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Summary of
2001 - 2003 Accomplishments Aeroelastic flap/torsion model for
composite rotor blade was developed (code validation, 2001) Refine
control algorithm of hybrid design was developed to achieve both
blade loads and vibration reductions with minimum control efforts
(2002) Multiple trailing edge flap configurations with RAS was
explored to reduce the vibration (2003) Blade loads and vibration
control via TEF Circuit with negative capacitor and active
inductor/blocking filters was explored to reduce electric power
(2001) New concept to enhance the active authority of PZT actuators
was developed and evaluated on PZT benders, stacks, and tubes
(2002) Full-Scale PZT tube / R-L-C circuit system was
experimentally realized and evaluated (2003) Active authority
enhancement of PZT actuator
Slide 9
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence 2004 Review
Team Comments The task made good progress and made good responses
to the last year suggestions. The task deals with vibration only
and it is suggested to check noise aspect of the concepts. - Other
Research is focused on trailing edge flaps for noise reduction.
(e.g. Prof. Friedmann at Univ. of Michigan has 2005 AIAA and AHS
papers on this subject). - Researchers in industry (e.g. Straub et
al) have also examined this idea. - A thorough investigation of
noise reduction was considered beyond the scope of the present
investigation. The review team is curious about drag penalty of
TEF? - This is an important question. - Increments in section drag
are modeled in the airload calculation - Primary penalties are for
flap deflections near transonic Mach number (adv side) and negative
deflections at high angles of attack (retreating side) - Proper
control law design can mitigate these penalties (Zhang, Smith,
Wang, 2000)
Slide 10
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Retrofit
Design at 0.30 Retrofit Design at 0.15 Performance Enhancement
Large flap deflections may occur around 90 and 270 azimuths, which
can cause aerodynamic penalties - stall and separation Flap Up Flap
Down
Slide 11
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Modified
objective function and control algorithm : The active flap
deflections at certain time history : Weighting factor Performance
Enhancement
Slide 12
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Retrofit
design at advance ratio of 0.30 Active Flap deflections around 270
azimuth are reduced to within 2 degrees Retrofit Retrofit with
constraints Performance Enhancement
Slide 13
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Hybrid design
at advance ratio of 0.15 Active flap deflections around 90 azimuth
are reduced from more than 6 degrees to about 2 degrees Hybrid
Hybrid with constraints Performance Enhancement
Slide 14
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Summary of
Accomplishments in 04/05 Analysis and Experiment of Piezoelectric
Resonant Actuation Systems Analysis is performed to explore the
feasibility of a resonant actuation system (RAS) Dynamic
characteristics of a RAS is examined via perturbation method
(forward flight) Power consumption of a RAS is explored Experiment
of a RAS with adaptive feed-forward controllers Bench Top Test A
voltage signal function is derived from the analytical model and
implemented using Matlab/dSPACE A phase controller, so called
phaser, is implemented to track the phase variation near a resonant
frequency Actuator amplification mechanism of a RAS is modified to
improve the dynamic performance 6.0 degrees are achieved
Slide 15
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence IDEA Actuator
authority enhancement 1.Resonance can be utilized to improve the
actuator authority Resonance Actuation System Baseline - Small
active authority over operating range Increase authority Increase
authority via mechanical tuning and electrical tailoring May not
cover the entire range of operating frequencies 3,4,5/rev 3/rev
4/rev 5/rev Frequency, Hz Typical Trailing Edge Flap Deflections
Required authority Single nominal actuator (baseline) 2.Electric
network can help to broaden and flatten the resonant driver effect
3/rev 4/rev 5/rev Three Small Actuators Three small flaps Single
flap Three small flaps Tune to Operating Frequency via Mechanical
Tuning frequency Actuator stroke Broaden and Flatten via Circuit
design
Slide 16
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Multiple TEF
w/ RAS Resonance Actuation System 1) PZT Actuator 2) Trailing Edge
Flap (Aerodynamics) 3) Electric Circuit Resonance Actuation System
1) PZT Actuator 2) Trailing Edge Flap (Aerodynamics) 3) Electric
Circuit Inductor: tune to operating frequency (e.g., 3,4,5/rev)
Resistor: flatten the resonant peak Negative capacitor: broaden the
resonant driver effect Inductor: tune to operating frequency (e.g.,
3,4,5/rev) Resistor: flatten the resonant peak Negative capacitor:
broaden the resonant driver effect RAS Electric Network
Amplification mechanism Mass moment of inertia of TEF Amplification
mechanism Mass moment of inertia of TEF Mechanical Tuning Resonance
Actuation System Application
Slide 17
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Mechanical
Tuning Resonant frequency : 2 = K / M Tuned to the operating
frequency (e.g. 3, 4, 5/rev) Tuning parameterTuning
massAmplification ratio Tuning parameter: Tuning mass,
Amplification ratio Tube actuator: K p,M p Amplification mechanism,
= A m A m Amplification mechanism, = A m , A m = l lever / l offset
(e.g. A m =5 will provide 5:1 amplification) Trailing-Edge Flap: M
f Aerodynamic loads: K f Tuning mass: M tune MK Flap hinge Hover:
stiffness is constant Forward flight: stiffness is varying along
the azimuth Periodic coefficient due to 1/rev aerodynamic forces
Time-varying characteristics of actuation system will be discussed
further Hover Forward Flight
Slide 18
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Actuator
authority enhancement at tuned frequency via Mechanical tuning
Problem: It is hard to control Active authority: The circuit can
broaden and flatten the resonant effect of the tuned system and
still maintain high authority Inductor: tune to operating frequency
(e.g., 3/rev, 4/rev, 5/rev) Negative capacitor: broaden the
resonant driver effect Resistor: flatten the frequency response
around the resonant peak Electrical Tailoring frequency Actuator
stroke Broaden and Flatten via Circuit design Bruneau et al.(1999)
Tang and Wang (2001) Behrens et al. (2001). (Resistor, Inductor)
Resonant frequency Operating frequency: 3,4,5/rev Phase variation
near resonant freq. Need to design controller to track phase
variation Developed and tested in this years effort Phase variation
near resonant freq. Need to design controller to track phase
variation Developed and tested in this years effort Phase plot
Slide 19
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Perturbation
Method in Forward Flight Primary resonance at = (resonant frequency
in hover) Resonances due to time-varying characteristics at 2 = 2,
( 1) 2, ( 2) 2 Flap response q t includes other harmonics: ( 1), (
2), For example, if =4, then q t includes 2,3,4,5,6/rev harmonics
Time-varying characteristics of actuation system Equations of
motion of a coupled system w/o circuitry Normalized equations for
the purpose of perturbation Perturbed solution up to 2 :
Theodorsens theory for trailing edge flap
Slide 20
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Influence of
advance ratios to the major resonant frequency is not significant
RAS can be applied to forward flight as well as hover Actuation
system w/o circuitry Frequency Responses in Forward Flight
Actuation system with circuitry RAS in hover The actuator authority
is significantly increased from 1.25 degree to 4.5 degree Flat and
wide shape near the resonant frequency (approximately 8 Hz). RAS in
forward flight Main characteristics of the RAS (high authority with
wide bandwidth) are achieved in forward flight Operating frequency,
4/rev, 26.6Hz Hover Advance ratio 0.35 Advance ratio 0.15
Slide 21
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Flap Time
Histories in Forward Flight ( =0.35) 4/rev voltage signal input
4/rev harmonic component is increased from 1.5 to 3 degrees Need to
develop controller to resolve the side effects Nominal actuation
system Resonant Actuation System
Slide 22
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Summary of
Accomplishments in 04/05 Analysis and Experiment of Piezoelectric
Resonant Actuation Systems Analysis is performed to explore the
feasibility of a resonant actuation system (RAS) Dynamic
characteristics of a RAS is examined via perturbation method
(forward flight) Power consumption of a RAS is explored Experiment
of a RAS with adaptive feed-forward controllers Bench Top Test A
voltage signal function is derived from the analytical model and
implemented using Matlab/dSPACE A phase controller, so called
phaser, is implemented to track the phase variation near a resonant
frequency Actuator amplification mechanism of a RAS is modified to
improve the dynamic performance 6.0 degrees are achieved
Slide 23
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Feed-Forward
Controller for RAS Electric network is realized via Voltage Signal
Function which is derived from the coupled piezoelectric equations
The phase angle is adaptively corrected through the feedback of the
output signal Electric network is realized via Voltage Signal
Function which is derived from the coupled piezoelectric equations
The phase angle is adaptively corrected through the feedback of the
output signal Adaptive phaser to track the phase variation Voltage
Signal Function emulating of electric network Phase plot
Slide 24
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Experiment
Set-up 8 inch PZT tube, 12 inch flap (inertia only) Amplification
ratio: 5 (current), 15 (future) Mechanical tuning to 4/rev (26.6Hz)
8 inch PZT tube, 12 inch flap (inertia only) Amplification ratio: 5
(current), 15 (future) Mechanical tuning to 4/rev (26.6Hz)
Slide 25
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Bench Top Test
Results Actuator authority at the tuned frequency (26.6Hz)
Increases about 3.5 times when compared to the static deflection
(which would be produced by nominal actuation system) with 8 Hz
bandwidth The phase near a resonant frequency varies Implemented
adaptive controller is able to accurately follow the reference
Frequency Response Phase Control at 24 Hz Operating frequency w/
voltage signal function w/o voltage signal function 3.5
Slide 26
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Demonstration
of RAS Full-scaled PZT tube actuator fabricated (Jose Palacios and
Edward Smith, 2005) PZT tube is 4 inches long Simulated aerodynamic
loads Two springs (80 lb/in total) Applied voltage: 2250 Volts
Mechanical tuning: 33.3 Hz for MD 900, 5/rev Flap deflections with
simulated aerodynamic loads 12 inches flap, 400 RPM 6.0 degrees are
achieved at the operating frequency Nominal actuation authority is
0.2 degrees: 30 times increases Mechanically tuned actuator w/o
voltage signal function Test with voltage signal function is
scheduled in near future Resonant Actuation System with simulated
aerodynamic loads & improved amplification mechanism
Slide 27
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Planned
Efforts in 2005 Controller design for flap responses in forward
flight Reduce the side effects due to time-varying characteristics
Investigate the characteristics of a RAS further Continue the test
of a RAS with a voltage signal function Nonlinear characteristics
of a RAS Controller design for flap responses in forward flight
Reduce the side effects due to time-varying characteristics
Investigate the characteristics of a RAS further Continue the test
of a RAS with a voltage signal function Nonlinear characteristics
of a RAS Controller for side effects Characteristics of a RAS
Slide 28
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Summary of
Overall Accomplishments 1.Development of actuation systems for
active flap rotors A resonant actuation system (RAS) was developed
Bench top testing of full-scaled actuation system Dynamic
characteristics of a RAS in forward flight were explored Actuator
amplification mechanism of a RAS is modified to improve the dynamic
performance Objective: To advance the state-of-the-art of rotor
vibration suppression and blade loads reduction through combining
the two approaches 2.Development of analytical tool for rotor
analysis Free-wake for main rotor, unsteady aero and finite wing
effects for flaps Active load controls via dual flap (blade loads
reduction) Vibration reduction via multiple trailing edge flaps
controlled by resonant actuation system 1. High authority PZT
actuators 2. Effective vibration/blade loads control system
Slide 29
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Future Work
Hover or wind tunnel test of a RAS Active load controls for Heavy
Lift Helicopters Dual flap configuration together with RAS for
light weight rotors Damage detection using active flaps in forward
flight Active interrogation could be combined with active loads
control Hover or wind tunnel test of a RAS Active load controls for
Heavy Lift Helicopters Dual flap configuration together with RAS
for light weight rotors Damage detection using active flaps in
forward flight Active interrogation could be combined with active
loads control Damage identification using trailing edge flaps 2.
Straightened blade Active load controls via dual-flap 1. Deformed
blade
Slide 30
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence External
Interactions, Leveraging and Technology Transfer Have had
discussions with US Army AFDD (Mark Fulton, smart rotor testing,
resonant actuator and circuit concept, flap aspect ratio effect)
Boeing (Friedrich Straub, actuator requirements) Sikorsky: visited
(A. Bernhard, feasibility of multiple-flap configuration) U.
Maryland (I. Chopra et. al, hinge moments) U. Michigan (P.P.
Friedmann, auto-weight control)
Slide 31
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Novel, high
authority flap actuation concepts using single crystal stacks SBIR
(Small Business Innovation Research) Invercon and PennState
Buckling beam actuator together with RAS high actuation authority
Novel, high authority flap actuation concepts using single crystal
stacks SBIR (Small Business Innovation Research) Invercon and
PennState Buckling beam actuator together with RAS high actuation
authority External Interactions, Leveraging and Technology
Transfer
Slide 32
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Publications
and Presentations 1.Jun-Sik Kim, Edward C. Smith and Kon-Well Wang,
"Active loads control of composite rotor blade via trailing edge
flaps", 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC SDM Conference, Norfolk,
Virginia, April 7-10, 2003. 2.Jun-Sik Kim, Kon-Well Wang and Edward
C. Smith, "Active authority enhancement of piezoelectric actuator
design via mechanical resonance and electrical tailoring", Fifth
International Conference on Intelligent Materials (ICIM) June 14 -
17, 2003, State College, Pennsylvania 3.Jun-Sik Kim, Edward C.
Smith and Kon-Well Wang, "Helicopter Vibration Suppression via
Multiple Trailing Edge Flaps Controlled by Resonance Actuation
System", Tenth International Workshop on Dynamics and Aeroelastic
Stability Modeling of Rotorcraft System, November 3-5, 2003,
Student Success Center, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta,
GA. 4.Jun-Sik Kim, Kon-Well Wang and Edward C. Smith, High
Authority Piezoelectric Actuator Synthesis through Mechanical
Resonance and Electrical Tailoring, Adaptive Structures and
Material Systems Symposium, The Winter Annual Meeting of the ASME,
November 16 - 21, 2003, Washington Marriott Wardman Park,
Washington DC 5.Jun-Sik Kim, Edward C. Smith and Kon-Well Wang,
Helicopter Vibration Suppression via Multiple Trailing Edge Flaps
Controlled by Resonance Actuation System, the AHS 60 th Annual
Forum, Baltimore, MD, June 7- 10, 2004. 6.Jun-Sik Kim, Kon-Well
Wang and Edward C. Smith, High Authority Piezoelectric Actuator
Synthesis through Mechanical Resonance and Electrical Tailoring,
Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, Vol. 16,
No. 1, pp. 21-3, 2005 7.Jun-Sik Kim, Kon-Well Wang and Edward C.
Smith, Development of a Resonant Actuation System for Active Flap
Rotors, the AHS 61 st Annual Forum Gaylord Texas Resort, TX, June
1-3, 2005. 8.Jun-Sik Kim, Kon-Well Wang and Edward C. Smith, Design
and Analysis of Piezoelectric Transducer Based Resonant Actuation
Systems, Adaptive Structures and Material Systems Symposium, The
Winter Annual Meeting of the ASME, November 6-11, 2005, The Walt
Disney World Swan & Dolphin Hotel, Orlando, Florida
Slide 33
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Tasks 20012002
2004 2005 Extension of hybrid analysis to composite rotors, and
actuator- circuit model Initial studies on composite rotor and
actuators with APPNs Refinement for unsteady aero and control
algorithm(dual flap) New actuator concept development and
integrated study with rotor Refine aerodynamic model Design,
fabrication of actuators Methodology for robust design and adaptive
control Refinement and testing of resonance actuation system
Development of controller for flap responses in forward flight and
investigation of nonlinear features of a RAS 2003 Near Term Mid
Term Long Term Schedule and Milestones
Slide 34
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Questions? The
End
Slide 35
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Appendix
Slide 36
Task Review, 2005Rotorcraft Center of Excellence Influence of
advance ratios to the major resonant frequency Not significant
Averaged frequencies along the azimuth Almost constant with respect
to the advance ratio RAS can be applied to forward flight as well
as hover Actuation system w/o circuitry Frequency Responses in
Forward Flight Instantaneous frequencies Operating frequency,
4/rev, 26.6Hz Hover Advance ratio 0.35 Advance ratio 0.15