36
1 © 2007 TMIT Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute Task Force Submitters Task Force Submitters LFG Analysis LFG Analysis Children’s Hospitals Children’s Hospitals Taskforce Taskforce October 2007 October 2007

Task Force Submitters LFG Analysis

  • Upload
    otylia

  • View
    31

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Task Force Submitters LFG Analysis. Children’s Hospitals Taskforce October 2007. Objective. Provide Snapshot of Children’s Hospital vs. National Results Identify Gaps and Obtain Feedback Provide Context for Adoption Simulator Submission. Summary of Findings. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

1© 2007 TMIT Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

Task Force Submitters Task Force Submitters LFG AnalysisLFG Analysis

Task Force Submitters Task Force Submitters LFG AnalysisLFG Analysis

Children’s Hospitals TaskforceChildren’s Hospitals TaskforceOctober 2007October 2007

Children’s Hospitals TaskforceChildren’s Hospitals TaskforceOctober 2007October 2007

Page 2: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

2© 2007 TMIT Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

ObjectiveObjectiveObjectiveObjective

• Provide Snapshot of Children’s Provide Snapshot of Children’s Hospital vs. National ResultsHospital vs. National Results

• Identify Gaps and Obtain FeedbackIdentify Gaps and Obtain Feedback

• Provide Context for Adoption Simulator Provide Context for Adoption Simulator SubmissionSubmission

• Provide Snapshot of Children’s Provide Snapshot of Children’s Hospital vs. National ResultsHospital vs. National Results

• Identify Gaps and Obtain FeedbackIdentify Gaps and Obtain Feedback

• Provide Context for Adoption Simulator Provide Context for Adoption Simulator SubmissionSubmission

Page 3: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

3© 2007 TMIT Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

Summary of FindingsSummary of FindingsSummary of FindingsSummary of Findings

• 10 Organizations Submitted to the TMIT 10 Organizations Submitted to the TMIT SurveySurvey

• Average Average 721721 Points out of 1,000 Points out of 1,000

• National Average isNational Average is 706 706

• Range 918 – 492 PointsRange 918 – 492 Points

• 10 Organizations Submitted to the TMIT 10 Organizations Submitted to the TMIT SurveySurvey

• Average Average 721721 Points out of 1,000 Points out of 1,000

• National Average isNational Average is 706 706

• Range 918 – 492 PointsRange 918 – 492 Points

Page 4: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

4© 2007 TMIT Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

Distribution of SampleDistribution of SampleDistribution of SampleDistribution of Sample

0

1

2

3

4

5

n

Survey Score

Page 5: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

5© 2007 TMIT Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

Summary of FindingsSummary of FindingsSummary of FindingsSummary of Findings

• Strengths:Strengths:– ““As” Action (“Strongest” of the 4 As)As” Action (“Strongest” of the 4 As)– Safe Practices (Above National Average)Safe Practices (Above National Average)

• SP# 1.1 – Culture of Safety (+11%)SP# 1.1 – Culture of Safety (+11%)• SP# 2 – Informed Consent (+12%)SP# 2 – Informed Consent (+12%)• SP# 4 – Disclosure (+17%)SP# 4 – Disclosure (+17%)• SP# 17 – Perioperative Myocardial Ischemia SP# 17 – Perioperative Myocardial Ischemia

Prevention (+11%)Prevention (+11%)• SP# 20 – BSI (+16%)SP# 20 – BSI (+16%)• SP# 22 – Hand Hygiene (+13%)SP# 22 – Hand Hygiene (+13%)• SP# 25 – Wrong-Site (+17%)SP# 25 – Wrong-Site (+17%)

• Strengths:Strengths:– ““As” Action (“Strongest” of the 4 As)As” Action (“Strongest” of the 4 As)– Safe Practices (Above National Average)Safe Practices (Above National Average)

• SP# 1.1 – Culture of Safety (+11%)SP# 1.1 – Culture of Safety (+11%)• SP# 2 – Informed Consent (+12%)SP# 2 – Informed Consent (+12%)• SP# 4 – Disclosure (+17%)SP# 4 – Disclosure (+17%)• SP# 17 – Perioperative Myocardial Ischemia SP# 17 – Perioperative Myocardial Ischemia

Prevention (+11%)Prevention (+11%)• SP# 20 – BSI (+16%)SP# 20 – BSI (+16%)• SP# 22 – Hand Hygiene (+13%)SP# 22 – Hand Hygiene (+13%)• SP# 25 – Wrong-Site (+17%)SP# 25 – Wrong-Site (+17%)

Page 6: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

6© 2007 TMIT Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

Summary of FindingsSummary of FindingsSummary of FindingsSummary of Findings

• Gaps were Identified:Gaps were Identified:– ““As” Accountability (Weakest of the 4 As)As” Accountability (Weakest of the 4 As)– Safe Practices (below National Average)Safe Practices (below National Average)

• SP# 15 – Pharmacists’ Role (-6%)SP# 15 – Pharmacists’ Role (-6%)• SP# 19 – Risk of Aspiration (-8%)SP# 19 – Risk of Aspiration (-8%)• SP# 26 – Perioperative Myocardial Ischemia SP# 26 – Perioperative Myocardial Ischemia

Prevention (-36%)Prevention (-36%)• SP# 28 – DVT/VTE Prevention (-31%)SP# 28 – DVT/VTE Prevention (-31%)• SP# 29 – Anticoagulation Therapy (-17%)SP# 29 – Anticoagulation Therapy (-17%)

• Gaps were Identified:Gaps were Identified:– ““As” Accountability (Weakest of the 4 As)As” Accountability (Weakest of the 4 As)– Safe Practices (below National Average)Safe Practices (below National Average)

• SP# 15 – Pharmacists’ Role (-6%)SP# 15 – Pharmacists’ Role (-6%)• SP# 19 – Risk of Aspiration (-8%)SP# 19 – Risk of Aspiration (-8%)• SP# 26 – Perioperative Myocardial Ischemia SP# 26 – Perioperative Myocardial Ischemia

Prevention (-36%)Prevention (-36%)• SP# 28 – DVT/VTE Prevention (-31%)SP# 28 – DVT/VTE Prevention (-31%)• SP# 29 – Anticoagulation Therapy (-17%)SP# 29 – Anticoagulation Therapy (-17%)

Page 7: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 7Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

Culture of Safety: Practice 1 Element 1 – 120 Points

73%

62%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Children’s Hospitals

62% Nat’l. Avg.

National Average

Page 8: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 8Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

67% 68%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

62% Natl. Avg.

Culture of Safety: Practice 1 Element 2 – 20 Points

68% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals National Average

Page 9: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 9Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

58% 58%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

62% Natl. Avg.

Culture of Safety: Practice 1 Element 3 – 40 Points

58% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals National Average

Page 10: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 10Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

74% 73%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Culture of Safety: Practice 1 Element 4 – 120 Points

73% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals National Average

Page 11: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 11Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

59%

47%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

62% Natl. Avg.

Informed Consent: Practice 2 – 4 Points

47% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals National Average

Page 12: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 12Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

58%

51%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

62% Natl. Avg.

Life-Sustaining Treatment: Practice 3 – 4 Points

51% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals National Average

Page 13: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 13Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

85%

68%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

62% Natl. Avg.

Disclosure: Practice 4 – 25 Points

68% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals National Average

Page 14: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 14Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

75% 78%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

62% Natl. Avg.

Nursing Workforce: Practice 5 – 100 Points

78% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals National Average

Page 15: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 15Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

66%63%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

62% Natl Avg.

Direct Caregivers Workforce: Practice 6 – 20 Points

63% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals National Average

Page 16: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 16Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

75%

69%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

62% Natl. Avg.

Critical Care Information: Practice 8 – 84 Points

69% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals National Average

Page 17: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 17Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

71% 73%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Order Read-back: Practice 9 – 25 Points

73% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals National Average

Page 18: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 18Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

78%

70%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Labeling Studies: Practice 10 – 15 Points

70% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals National Average

Page 19: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 19Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

75%69%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

62% Natl. Avg.

Discharge System: Practice 11 – 25 Points

69% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals National Average

Page 20: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 20Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

85%82%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

62% Natl. Avg.

Abbreviations: Practice 13 – 11 Points

82% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals National Average

Page 21: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 21Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

85% 83%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

62% Natl. Avg.

Medication Reconciliation: Practice 14 – 35 Points

83% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals National Average

Page 22: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 22Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

74%

81%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

62% Natl. Avg.

Pharmacists’ Role: Practice 15 – 32 Points

81% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals National Average

Page 23: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 23Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

74%71%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

62% Natl. Avg.

Standardized Medication Labeling & Packaging: Practice 16 – 20 Points

71% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals National Average

Page 24: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 24Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

84%

73%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

62% Natl. Avg.

High-Alert Medications: Practice 17 – 20 Points

73% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals National Average

Page 25: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 25Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

62%

68%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

62% Natl. Avg.

Unit-Dose Medications: Practice 18 – 25 Points

68% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals National Average

Page 26: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 26Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

74%

82%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

62% Natl. Avg.

Risk of Aspiration & VAP Prevention: Practice 19 – 20 Points

82% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals National Average

Page 27: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 27Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

95%

80%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

62% Natl. Avg.

Central Venous Catheter Blood Stream Infection Prevention: Practice 20 – 30 Points

80% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals National Average

Page 28: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 28Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

84%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

62% Natl. Avg.

Surgical-Site Infection: Practice 21 – 30 Points

84% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals

79%

National Average

Page 29: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 29Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

81%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

62% Natl. Avg.

Hand Hygiene: Practice 22 – 30 Points

81% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals

94%

National Average

Page 30: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 30Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

82%

76%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Influenza Protection: Practice 23 – 10 Points

76% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals National Average

Page 31: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 31Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

83%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

62% Natl. Avg.

Wrong-site Surgical Prevention: Practice 25 – 20 Points

83% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals

100%

National Average

Page 32: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 32Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

51%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

62% Natl. Avg.

Perioperative Myocardial Ischemia/Infarct Prevention: Practice 26 – 20 Points

51% Nat’l. Avg.

0%

Children’s Hospitals

15%

National Average

Page 33: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 33Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

77%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Pressure Ulcer Prevention: Practice 27 – 25 Points

77% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals

84%

National Average

Page 34: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 34Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

63%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

DVT/VTE Prevention: Practice 28 – 25 Points

63% Nat’l. Avg.

31%

Children’s Hospitals National Average

Page 35: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 35Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

51%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

62% Natl. Avg.

Anticoagulation Therapy: Practice 29 –– 35 Points

51% Nat’l. Avg.

Children’s Hospitals

34%

National Average

Page 36: Task Force Submitters  LFG Analysis

© 2007 TMIT 36Children Hospitals - Confidential Do Not Distribute

65%62%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

62% Natl. Avg.62% Nat’l. Avg.

Contrast Media-induced Renal Failure: Practice 30 –– 10 Points

Children’s Hospitals National Average