Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
- 1 -
Supportive Policy Framework for Renewable Energy –
Experiences for the design of Feed in-Tariff Systems
6 th March 2012, Tokyo
Maike Schmidt
Zentrum für Sonnenenergie- und Wasserstoff-Forschung
Baden-Württemberg (ZSW)
Tariff Setting for the promotion of Renewable Energy –
General Approach
- 2 -
The Renewable Energy Sources Act –
Basic principles for tariff setting
Tariff setting based on full costing.
Cost determination based on representative plants which can act as a
model for each technology, focussing on the determination of average
costs and taking cost ranges into account.
Fixed nominal tariff payments over 20 years.
The model assumptions are drawn from a close market observation
and the evaluation of realized plants by independent consultants.
Yearly cutback of the tariffs for new plants (degression), referring to an
evaluation of cost development over time.
Performance oriented payments (per kilowatt-hour produced).
Reviewing of the tariffs every three years.
- 4 -
General approach for cost assessment
used in Germany
Nominal Levelized Cost of Electricity Generation (LCOE)
LCOE = Annuity of Life Cycle Generation Cost
Mean Annual Electricity Generation
1)1(
)1()1)((
0
T
Tt
t
T
t
tr
rrrOMIAnnuity
Present Value of Life cycle costs Annuity Factor
T = Life Time
I = Investment
OM = Operation & Maintenance r = Weighted Interest Rate
- 6 -
Yearly cutback of the tariffs for new plants –
an incentive for innovation and cost reduction
Historic experience curves for electricity supply technologies
Global installed capacity (GWe)
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
Investm
ent P
rices (
€2
00
6)/
kW
e)
100
1000
10000
100000
PV (1970-2006)
Wind onshore (1990-2006)
Wind offshore (1990-2007)
Natural gas CC (1975-1997)
Pulverized coal (1942-1997)
PR >1.01975-1990 PR ~ 0.75
1990-1997
PR = 0.92
PR = 0.85 (1990-2004)
PR~ 0.9
PR~ 1.13? 2002 - ?
PR = 0.7941970-2006
PR ~ 1.0?2002 - ?
Source: Junginger et al. 2010
National vs. global
learning!
Adjustment to
national conditions
necessary!
Including market
forecast, expected
cost development of
major components
etc.
Experience curves offer a first indication for setting yearly degression rates
- 7 -
Maike Schmidt
Zentrum für Sonnenenergie- und Wasserstoff-Forschung
Baden-Württemberg (ZSW)
Tariff Setting for Photovoltaics
in Germany
Supportive Policy Framework for Renewable Energy –
Experiences for the design of Feed in-Tariff Systems
6 th March 2012, Tokyo
- 11 -
Investment = Price of the installed photovoltaic system
Module
Balance-of-System-Cost
Mounting Wiring
PV cost assessment
in Germany
Installation*
Racking Inverter
* Including grid connection, permitting etc.
- 12 -
0,95 €/W
0,3 €/W
0,12 €/W
0,07 €/W
0,19 €/W
0,2 €/W
0,14 €/W
0,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1,0
1,2
1,4
1,6
1,8
2,0
2,2
2,4
PV
-Sy
ste
m P
ric
e [
€/W
]
Installer's
Margin
Installation,
planning
mounting
wiring
racking
Inverter
Module
Example for the investment for a PV
plant up to 100 kW in Germany today
Total Investment 1.950 €/kW
• installer surveys
• published technical reports
• published industry data
• screening of corresponding
press releases and news
• scientific surveys and market reports
• the German PV Industry Association
• expert estimates
Data are collected from
PV cost assessment in Germany
Investment = Price of the installed photovoltaic system
- 13 -
PV cost assessment in Germany
Nominal Levelized Cost of Electricity Generation (LCOE)
LCOE = Annuity of Life Cycle Generation Cost
Mean Annual Electricity Generation
1)1(
)1()1)((
0
T
Tt
t
T
t
tr
rrrOMIAnnuity
Weighted interest rate = 5%
equity : debt = 15 : 85 (varying between 20:80 for large ground mounted
systems and 10:90 or even 100% debt for small roof
top installations)
interest rate for debt capital = 4%
interest rate for equity capital = between 9% and 14%
- 14 -
Costs for operations and maintenance (O&M) are calculated as a share
of the initial systems costs (investment).
For large scale systems > 1 MW labour costs are added to O&M costs
(> 1 MW: 8.000 € per year; > 20 MW: 20.000 € per year).
The availability of long-term data on O&M cost is limited.
O&M costs are estimated as 1,5 % of the total investment per year
(1 % O&M + 0,5 % miscellanous (insurance, leasing))
1)1(
)1()1)((
0
T
Tt
t
T
t
tr
rrrOMIAnnuity
As the determination method leads to the nominal levelized cost of
electricity generation (LCOE) O&M cost has to be adjusted to the inflation
rate (2% per year).
PV cost assessment in Germany
- 16 -
207,14 €/kW LCOE =
Annual Electricity Production 900 kWh/kW = 23,00 ct/kWh
The remuneration rate is set to cover all cost for an average installation! The
PV power production shall be feasible without any other subsidy! In this case
23,0 ct/kWh would be a possible rate!
PV cost assessment in Germany
Annuity of Life Cycle Generation Cost
23,221,3
16,1 14,9
22,23 22,23
17,07 17,07
24,43 24,43
18,76 18,76
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
21
24
27
5 kW 30 kW 1 MW 20 MW
Dachanlage Dachanlage Freiflächenanlage Freiflächenanlage
Levelized
co
st
of
ele
ctr
icit
y [
€ct/
kW
h]
Stromgestehungskosten 1. Halbjahr 2012
Vergütung zum 01.01.2012 (-15 %)
voraussichtliche Vergütung zum 01.07.2012 (-9 %)
- 17 -
Yearly cutback of the tariffs for new plants –
an incentive for innovation and cost reduction
- 18 -
Influence of bottlenecks and oversupplies
along the value chain in Germany
time
2010:
inverter shortage due to
lacking supplies of
prefabricated parts
high profit margins for
inverter suppliers
2008:
growing silicon demand led
to spot market prices which
were 3 times higher than in
2007
high profit margins for silicon
suppliers
2009 (second half):
shortage of mounting
manpower and capacity
high profit margins for
installers
2006:
module shortage due to
limited production capacities
high profit margins for
module suppliers
Since 2009:
module supplies grow faster
than demand
rapid decline in module
prices
- 19 -
2004
Cell
Production
Capacity 2004
Module
Production
Capacity 2004
Thin film Production
capacity 2004
Development of PV production capacity
- 20 -
2006
Cell
Production
Capacity 2006
Module
Production
Capacity 2006
Thin film Production
capacity 2006
Development of PV production capacity
- 21 -
2010
Cell
Production
Capacity 2010
Module
Production
Capacity 2010
Thin film Production
capacity 2010
Development of PV production capacity
The Photovoltaic world market has grown by more than 10 fold between
2004 and 2010. The turn over rose to 70 billion US$. In 2010 a photovoltaic
capacity equal to 18 nuclear power plants (18.300 MW) has been build!
- 22 -
Market development in Germany
No degression EEG 2000
EEG 2004
EEG 2009
Degression rate
5% roof tops
6,5% grd. mounted
Degression rate
9% basic rate
+/- 1% depending on
capacity deployment
PV Amendment
2010
Degression rate
9% basic rate
Exceeded adjustment
to capacity deployment
PV Amendment
2011
Exceeded adjustment
to capacity deployment
- 24 -
Lessons learnt –
recommendations for Japan
Fixed tariff payments over a long time period offer
certainty for investors.
Tariff setting based on full costing makes the
investment attractive.
Monitoring of the market development and periodic
reviewing of the tariffs are crucial.
Start out with a transparent tariff system which is
easily understood.
Introduce a yearly cutback but do not link it to
capacity expansion (keep certainty for investors).