Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2014 NC AWWA - WEA Annual Conference November 18, 2014
Taming Tigers and Wrestling Anacondas Pender County Commerce Park WWTP
Pender County
Columbus County
New Hanover County
Bladen County
Brunswick County
Pender County
North Carolina
City of Wilmington
Project Location
City of Wilmington Interstate 40
Interstate 140
Pender County Commerce Park
Facts are stubborn things, but sta5s5cs are more pliable. -‐-‐ Mark Twain
Economic Decline
Computers/ Primary Trans. Paper/ Fabricated Year All Electronics Garments Textiles Metals Equip. Printing Metals % Chge. -‐‑29% -‐‑35% -‐‑78% -‐‑67% -‐‑59% -‐‑26% -‐‑30% -‐‑21% Abs. Chge. -‐‑5,657 -‐‑947 -‐‑797 -‐‑695 -‐‑648 -‐‑596 -‐‑479 -‐‑406
Table 1. – Job Losses in Manufacturing by Industry, 1978-2007
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics
Table 1. – Job Losses in Manufacturing by Industry, 1978-‐2007
Economic Decline
Change
Item (US$ bil.)
Total -‐‑699.1
Oil & Gas -‐‑237.3
Computer & Electronic Products -‐‑109.1
Apparel -‐‑52.6
Electrical Equipment -‐‑27.4
Chemicals -‐‑18.9
Table 2. – Manufacturing Trade Deficit Growth,
By Industry, 1989-2007
Source: US International Trade Administration
Table 2. – Manufacturing Trade Deficit Growth, By Industry, 1989-‐2007
Economic Decline
1500
Economic Decline
It might seem obvious, but the second thing that is needed to help people find jobs...is jobs. -‐-‐ Janet Yellen, Federal Reserve Chair
Project Location
City of Wilmington Interstate 40
Interstate 140
Pender County Commerce Park
Pender Commerce Park
Pender County Commerce Park
Acme Smoked Fish Facility
Proposed 0.5 MGD WWTP
ExisWng 2 MGD Water Treatment
Plant
Prior BASF Industrial Facility
ExisWng Discharge OuYall
Cape Fear River
New Hanover County
Pender County
Industry Competition/Recruitment v Acme Smoke Fish – Brooklyn, NY
v April 2013 - Pender County Vs. Hampton Roads Sanitation District (HRSD)
v High-strength waste stream v No pre-treatment – major decision point for industry v 0.5 MGD WWTP Selected as initial phase v Would be located at Pender County Commerce Park
• Co-‐locate with exis/ng 2 MGD WTP
Challenges
v Waste Strength
v Permit v EA/FONSI v Schedule v Costs
Design Loading &
Permit Limits INFLUENT PARAMETER
Industrial User1 Domestic Total
Average Daily Flow (MGD) 0.1 0.4 0.50Max Day (MGD) N/A 0.8 1.00
Peak Hourly Flow (MGD) N/A 1.00 1.25Organic Loading (BOD5)
SUMMER (Apr. 1 to Oct. 31)(mg/l) 3,155 250 831(lbs/d) 2,631 834 3,465
Winter (Nov. 1 to Mar. 31)(mg/l) 3,155 250 831(lbs/d) 2,631 834 3,465
Total Suspended Solids(mg/l) 1,045 220 385(lbs/d) 872 734 1,605TKN(mg/l) 363 40 105(lbs/d) 303 133 436NH3-‐‑N(mg/l) 18 25 24(lbs/d) 15 83 98
Total Phosphorus(mg/l) 89 6 23(lbs/d) 74 20 94
DESIGN INFLUENT WASTEWATER LOADING
EFFLUENT PARAMETERMonthly Avg. Weekly Avg.
Flow (MGD) 0.1 0.4BOD, 5-‐‑day, 20OC (Summer) (mg/L) 5.0 7.5BOD, 5-‐‑day, 20OC (Winter) (mg/L) 10.0 15.0Total Suspended Solids (mg/L) 10.0 15.0NH3 as N, (Summer) (mg/L) 1.0 3.0NH3 as N, (Winter) (mg/L) 2.0 6.0
Fecal Coliforms (Geometric Mean) 200/100mL 400/100mLDissolved Oxygen (mg/L)
pHNot Less Than 6.0
Between 6.0 and 9.0 s.u.
v Acme 100,000 GPD IniWal
v 400,000 GPD reserved for future tenants
Process Selection
v Eliminate pre-‐treatment for industry
v Adaptable/expandable for future flows v Adaptable to meet RCW standards v Green/Sustainable/Different
Process Overview
Greenhouse / MBBR / FFR
Greenhouse Fixed Film Reactors
Moving Bed Bioreactors
Greenhouse / Fixed Film Reactors
Permit & EA Approach Original Concept v 2009 Inter-‐local Agreement CFPUA & Pender
v Jointly construct 0.5 MGD WWTP v CFPUA NPDES 4 MGD Permit v Pender Land – Co-‐located with Pender WTP Revised Approach v NPDES Permit transferred to Pender County v ILA Amended – CFPUA maintained right to acquire capacity in future
expansions v FONSI Acquired 2010 – transferred with permit ownership
Schedule Challenges
v Acme selected Pender County August 2013
v OperaWonal by October/November 2014 v NTP Design September 2013
Two Phases Phase 1 – Pump & Haul Phase 2 – WWTP Completed Phase 1 ü Consult with DENR for Pump & Haul approach ü U5lize In-‐Plant PS, Equaliza5on Basin, Acid Feed ü Acquired ATC July 2014 ü P&H Permit acquire October 2014
Phase 2 ü Construct remaining facili5es ü Maintain P&H opera5ons during construc5on ü Adver5sed for Bids November 10, 2014 ü Complete construc5on Spring 2016
Solutions
Phase I P&H System Overview
`
In-‐Plant PS
SS From Commerce
Park
EqualizaWon Basin
P&H Truck Load Out
0.5 MGD Phase II Facility Overview
`
In-‐Plant PS
SS From Commerce
Park
EqualizaBon Basin
P&H Truck Load Out
Greenhouse & Submerged Fixed Film Reactor
Moving Bed Bioreactor
Blowers & Electrical
Screen & Grit Removal
Chemical Feed & Storage
Secondary Clarifiers RAS/WAS PS
Disk Filters
Sludge Loading StaWon
UV DisinfecWon
Effluent PS
Aerobic Digesters
To Cape Fear River
(future)
(future) (future)
(future)
Generator
(future) – Expandable To 4 MGD
Probable Construction Costs
Item Amount
Phase I $1.9M
Phase II $12.8M
Total Proposed Construction Budget $14.7M
Funding Partners $ 4 MM
v EDA
v CDBG v Golden Leaf FoundaWon v Rural Economic Development Center
Summary
ü Creative approach to help aLract industry ü Local Collaboration ü Funding Collaboration
ü Regulatory Collaboration
Transforma5on through collabora5on. -‐-‐ RTCC mantra
Crea5ve collabora5on is awesome. -‐-‐ Alicia Silverstone
![user1@contoso.com (mailbox or mail user [preferred]) targetAddress=SMTP:user1@contoso.mail.onmicrosoft.com user1@contoso.com EmailAddresses=SMTP:user1@contoso.com](https://img.pdfslide.us/doc/110x75/56649d705503460f94a51e9c/user1contosocom-mailbox-or-mail-user-preferred-targetaddresssmtpuser1contosomailonmicrosoftcom.jpg)
