Upload
caren-morgan
View
218
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Talbot effect in X-Ray Talbot effect in X-Ray WaveguidesWaveguides
I. Bukreeva1,2, A. Cedola1, A. Sorrentino1F. Scarinci1,M. Ilie1, M. Fratini1, and S. Lagomarsino1
1Istituto di Fotonica e Nanotecnologie – CNR, Roma – Italy2Russian Academy of Science, P. N. Lebedev Physics Institute, Moscow, Russia
Poland,Krakow 2010
____________________________________________________________________________ I. Bukreeva, S. LagomarsinoI. Bukreeva, S. Lagomarsino
WaveguidesWaveguides
Advantages of front-coupling WGAdvantages of front-coupling WG
Core layer: vacuum
FC WG as optics for X-ray tubes
Resonant beam couplingResonant beam coupling Front-couplingFront-coupling
____________________________________________________________________________ I. Bukreeva, S. LagomarsinoI. Bukreeva, S. Lagomarsino
Computer simulationComputer simulation
Method
- Numerical solution of wave equation- Analytical solution of wave equation
Optics Waveguide with front-
coupling
Source
incoherent radiation coherent radiation
____________________________________________________________________________ I. Bukreeva, S. LagomarsinoI. Bukreeva, S. Lagomarsino
Talbot effect in periodical Talbot effect in periodical structuresstructures
____________________________________________________________________________ I. Bukreeva, S. LagomarsinoI. Bukreeva, S. Lagomarsino
Talbot effect. Phase gratingsTalbot effect. Phase gratings (phase (phase ) vs) vs plane FC WGs plane FC WGs
Phase grating ()) Period D=2d=200 nm
Waveguide with vacuum gapWaveguide with vacuum gap
d=100 nm, d=100 nm, =0.154 nm, R=0.154 nm, Rfrfr=1=1
Pla
ne w
ave
Pla
ne w
ave
The interference pattern has a maximum modulation at distancesThe interference pattern has a maximum modulation at distances
XXmm=mD=mD2/(8/(8) – ) – fractional Talbot distance, forfractional Talbot distance, for WG D=2d WG D=2d
In general self image fenomenon occur in wave field composed of discrete modesIn general self image fenomenon occur in wave field composed of discrete modes
WG
WGPla
ne w
ave
Pla
ne w
ave
____________________________________________________________________________ I. Bukreeva, S. LagomarsinoI. Bukreeva, S. Lagomarsino
Talbot effect. Phase gratingsTalbot effect. Phase gratings (phase (phase ) vs) vs plane FC WGs plane FC WGs
Au,nm d = 100 nm
1) Phase grating. Period D, 0.5 duty cycle and π phase shift. Diffraction pattern has half the period of the grating d=D/2
2) FC waveguide with vacuum gap d=D/2.
The width of the energy distribution at odd fractional
Talbot distances XT= mDeff2/8λis
one half that at even distances
Diffraction pattern has a maximum modulation Diffraction pattern has a maximum modulation at at fractional Talbot distances XT= mD2/8λ
deff≈d+2where=1/k(c-m)1/2
is the penetration depth for m-th mode
WG
U0(
y)
____________________________________________________________________________ I. Bukreeva, S. LagomarsinoI. Bukreeva, S. Lagomarsino
Talbot effect. Talbot effect. Front coupling WGsFront coupling WGs
Diffraction pattern in the far field zone
The width of the energy distribution in far field
zone for even fractional Talbot distancesis one half that for odd distances
d d ddd
I, a
.u.
d
WG
U0(
y)U
0(y)
____________________________________________________________________________ I. Bukreeva, S. LagomarsinoI. Bukreeva, S. Lagomarsino
Montgomery self-imagingMontgomery self-imaging
Talbot self-imaging (sufficient condition)
Wave field with a lateral periodicity Py is
periodic in longitudinal direction with period
Montgomery self-imaging (necessary condition)
Wave field has a longitudinal periodicity Px in direction x if the lateral components of the k vector obeys the condition
)exp()()()( , yikAyUyUyUm
mym0Pxxx
2
x
2
22my P
m12k )(,
)()()()( yUyUPyUyUxPxxy00
2y
x
P2Px
y
U0(
y)
the paraxial case
____________________________________________________________________________ I. Bukreeva, S. LagomarsinoI. Bukreeva, S. Lagomarsino
1P
nd2
m
2
x
22
2
3. Lateral P3. Lateral Pyy and longitudinal period P and longitudinal period Pxx
are varied independentlyare varied independently
2
2Tx
2My
2kk
Montgomery self-imagingMontgomery self-imaging
Ewald sphere
...,,,,, 210mP
m12
P
m12k
y
2
y
2mxT
1. Wave field with lateral periodicity1. Wave field with lateral periodicity
2. The longitudinally periodic wave field2. The longitudinally periodic wave field
WG with the longitudinal periodicityWG with the longitudinal periodicity
y
x
Paraxial domain /~,max xpNnmmJürgen Jahns, and Adolf W. Lohmann Appl. Opt. , Vol. 48, No. 18 / 20 June 2009
...,,,, 21nP
n12k
2
x
2
nyM
U0(
y)
2
2y
2x
2kk
____________________________________________________________________________ I. Bukreeva, S. LagomarsinoI. Bukreeva, S. Lagomarsino
Multimodal WGs with longitudinal Multimodal WGs with longitudinal periodicityperiodicity
WG with longitudinal periodicity. Period PL=deff
2/ , duty 2/3 Multimodal WG, Au, nm,d=100 nm
The energy distribution at exit apertue of the WG (red line) and WG with grating (blue line)
The energy distribution at far field zone. WG (red line) and WG with grating (blue line)
U0(
y)
U0(
y)
____________________________________________________________________________ I. Bukreeva, S. LagomarsinoI. Bukreeva, S. Lagomarsino
Multimodal WGs with longitudinal Multimodal WGs with longitudinal periodicity. Incoherent source.periodicity. Incoherent source.
WG with WG with gratinggrating..Period P=deff Period P=deff 22//=119.9=119.9 mm(39.97(39.97 m vacuum, 79.94m vacuum, 79.94 m Cr)m Cr)ddeffeff =109.5 nm =109.5 nm
WG
WGRan
dom
sou
rce
Propagation of the incoherent wave in the WG
Ran
dom
sou
rce
____________________________________________________________________________ I. Bukreeva, S. LagomarsinoI. Bukreeva, S. Lagomarsino
ConclusionConclusion
1. The field in multimode x-ray waveguides with longitudinal periodicity are studied.
2. Modal structure of WGs depends on the ratio of the lateral and longitudinal periods
3. Montgomery condition for the wave vector includes the wavelength of the x-ray radiation and therefore x-ray waveguides with longitudinal periodicity can influence on temporal frequencies of the field
____________________________________________________________________________ I. Bukreeva, S. LagomarsinoI. Bukreeva, S. Lagomarsino
Poland,Krakow 2010