Taking the Risk, Calculating the Return: Developing Successful E- Learning Partnerships Curt Bonk,...
105
Taking the Risk, Calculating the Return: Developing Successful E-Learning Partnerships Curt Bonk, Indiana University, Associate Curt Bonk, Indiana University, Associate Prof Prof http://php.indiana.edu/~cjbonk http://php.indiana.edu/~cjbonk and and President, CourseShare.com President, CourseShare.com [email protected][email protected]http://CourseShare.com http://CourseShare.com and and Ann Hill Duin, University of Minnesota; Ann Hill Duin, University of Minnesota; [email protected][email protected]
Taking the Risk, Calculating the Return: Developing Successful E- Learning Partnerships Curt Bonk, Indiana University, Associate Prof cjbonkand
Taking the Risk, Calculating the Return: Developing Successful
E- Learning Partnerships Curt Bonk, Indiana University, Associate
Prof http://php.indiana.edu/~cjbonkand President, CourseShare.com
[email protected]://CourseShare.comand Ann Hill Duin,
University of Minnesota; [email protected]
Key Reasons for University Investment Access to external
resources (67 percent). Access to external resources (67 percent).
Improved efficiency in teaching and research (63 percent). Improved
efficiency in teaching and research (63 percent). Providing
distance education to a potentially unlimited audience (58
percent). Providing distance education to a potentially unlimited
audience (58 percent).
Slide 5
Less Important Reasons for University Investment Cooperation
and resource sharing within the higher education community (41
percent). Cooperation and resource sharing within the higher
education community (41 percent). Building partnerships with
business and government (31 percent). Building partnerships with
business and government (31 percent).
Slide 6
Slide 7
Some Respondent Quotes to offer equal opportunity of high
quality education to students in more rural areas, we are under a
mandate to increase the number of students we serve, Its a new
revenue source, thats #1, and because Web-based activities are
becoming ubiquitous in ALL workplaces. Students will demand
Web-based courses or go somewhere else.
Slide 8
Facts and Projections Those participating in continuing
education will rise to 100 million by 2004Those participating in
continuing education will rise to 100 million by 2004 Eleven
mega-universities serve learners at a cost of $350 per learner per
yearEleven mega-universities serve learners at a cost of $350 per
learner per year Postsecondary enrollment in web-based courses will
represent 15% of total enrollment in 2002Postsecondary enrollment
in web-based courses will represent 15% of total enrollment in 2002
International Data Corporation, 2001 E-learning market will be $25
billion by 2003E-learning market will be $25 billion by 2003
Merrill Lynch, 2001 By 2010, the number of corporate universities
will exceed the number of traditional universitiesBy 2010, the
number of corporate universities will exceed the number of
traditional universities U.S. Commission on Web-based Learning,
2000
Slide 9
Robert Jackson, E-Learning, Corp- University Partnerships
University of Tennessee, Assistant Dean of University Outreach and
Director of Distance Ed & Independent Study; [email protected]
Higher education has long had a rocky road creating successful
partnerships with business and industry. The rise of e-learning
represents a critical opportunity to all parties. Hear what
separates these groups and find out what could bring them together
in mutually beneficial elearning partnerships.
Slide 10
Distant Cousins (Robert Jackson, e-learning 2002) Historical
PerspectiveHistorical Perspective Closed Architectures Separate
trade shows and coordinating orgsSeparate trade shows and
coordinating orgs Uneasy Truce Philosophical Differences: Training
vs EDPhilosophical Differences: Training vs ED Course cost
$35,000-$125,000 (mostly slick multimedia) vs $4,000-$10,000
(mostly text and static graphics) SME (part-time or temps vs.
fulltime tenured professor Owned by company (work for hire) vs.
owned by individual (intellectual property)
Slide 11
Inputs and Processes Consensus (Robert Jackson, e-learning
2002) Learning TopicCorporations ViewUniversities View Dominant
elearning instructional style Self-pacedInstructor-led Interest in
collaborative activities as learning tools HighHigh Preferred
learning format asynchronoussynchronous Preferred live
instructional metaphor Shoulder to shoulder, peer-to-peer face to
face, expert to learner Use of Course Preassessments and gain
scores FrequentlyRarely Curriculum Designer Training Manager
Individual Faculty Instructional Technology Developer Contract
Programmer Faculty or grad assistants Targeted learner community
Independent Study Cohort Preferred form of elearning content
management software Learning Management System (LMS) Course
Management System (CMS) Interest in Learning Content Management
Systems (LCMS) Moderate to high Low Interest in elearning
management system uniform standards High Low to moderate
Slide 12
Goals & Outcomes Consensus (Robert Jackson, e-learning
2002) Learning TopicCorporations ViewUniversities View Learning
purpose just in time, job enhancement focused just in case,
knowledge awareness focused Target duration of learning Just enough
Feast of learning Concern for dropouts Low to moderate Moderate to
high Descriptive word for learning used in conversation skills or
training education Assessment strategies Competency, prescriptive
assessment, skill gap analysis, quantitative Mastery, performance
relative to cohort, qualitative assessments by faculty Time
efficiency goals Reduce time and expense Restricted by
accreditation standards Length of typical learning object is
measured in increments of Minutes, within learning objects
Hours/Days, within courses Institutional desire for learning
content modularity High Moderate to low
Slide 13
Common Ground Strategic Directions (Robert Jackson, e-learning
2002) AcademicAcademic Value quantified outcomes Embrace shorter
courses (modularity), and by extension, elearning standards Be
flexible, rethinking old campus-centric conventions Embrace
standards and preassessment Corporate & Government Appreciate
knowledge as a route to strategic thinking Appreciate and help
change higher ed standards of seat- time. Value synchronous
delivery
Slide 14
Making Connections Partnering in a Digital Age Ideas from Ann
Hill Duin Ann Hill Duin, [email protected] 2002
Slide 15
An Internet gateway through which learners, employers, and
learning providers are drawn together into a dynamic partnership
that creates value for learners, enhances economic development, and
engages institutions in meeting the lifelong learning needs of
twenty-first century learners (2001, xvii).
Slide 16
Priorities: What outcomes should you expect?
Slide 17
Possible Priorities 1.Address a clear learner need 2.Leverage
resources; share infrastructure 3.Respond to new markets; improve
competitiveness 4.Enhance access and pedagogy of learning
Slide 18
Slide 19
US Army Choose Pricewaterhouse $453 million e-learning
program$453 million e-learning program 10 companies and 29
colleges10 companies and 29 colleges 12,000 students in year 1;
10,000 more in 200212,000 students in year 1; 10,000 more in 2002
Goals: Tech savvy soliders; succeed in on the digitized
battlefield, enhance retention and help soldiers achieve academic
degrees.Goals: Tech savvy soliders; succeed in on the digitized
battlefield, enhance retention and help soldiers achieve academic
degrees. Soldiers stationed in Australia, Honduras, Kosovo, Bosnia
and Herzegovina, Belgium, Japan, Egypt, the UK, Kuwait, Singapore,
Germany, Korea, Macedonia, Italy and Jordan.Soldiers stationed in
Australia, Honduras, Kosovo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Belgium,
Japan, Egypt, the UK, Kuwait, Singapore, Germany, Korea, Macedonia,
Italy and Jordan.
Slide 20
Distance learner - message I currently live in Maryland and
will be moving to Mason City, Iowa to be with family. I have an AA
from a community college in Maryland. I wanted to know if you had a
distance education program at [local community college] that I
would be able to get involved in. If you do, could you email me
info at or mail it to me at
Slide 21
Slide 22
Certificate: Using the Internet in Corp Training Jones
International University Corp trainers retool existing content for
online delivery; build an online moduleCorp trainers retool
existing content for online delivery; build an online module 4
weeks, $550; also optional customized corp training certificate4
weeks, $550; also optional customized corp training certificate Use
Web to enhance course content, & create a powerful, interactive
learning environment for trainees.Use Web to enhance course
content, & create a powerful, interactive learning environment
for trainees.
Slide 23
Online Graduation Ceremonies with Famous Commencement
Speakers
Slide 24
In Search of a Need? Fathom, the for-profit, online-learning
provider run by Columbia University, has added corporate-training
courses to its academic and cultural offerings in a bid to market
itself to corporate achievers and job hunters. The move is the
latest change in direction the company has made in its search for
customers and investors in the competitive distance-education
market.Fathom, the for-profit, online-learning provider run by
Columbia University, has added corporate-training courses to its
academic and cultural offerings in a bid to market itself to
corporate achievers and job hunters. The move is the latest change
in direction the company has made in its search for customers and
investors in the competitive distance-education market.Fathom,
Michael Arnone, Chronicle of HE, Feb 8, 2002
Slide 25
In Search of a Need? Columbia announced Wednesday that four
for-profit education companies -- SmartForce, Zoologic, the Kaplan
Colleges, and PrimeLearning -- are now offering mostly noncredit
courses on business- related subjects through Fathom's Professional
Development Learning Center The partnerships will benefit Fathom in
the short run because Fathom needs the money that the courses will
generate,Columbia announced Wednesday that four for-profit
education companies -- SmartForce, Zoologic, the Kaplan Colleges,
and PrimeLearning -- are now offering mostly noncredit courses on
business- related subjects through Fathom's Professional
Development Learning Center The partnerships will benefit Fathom in
the short run because Fathom needs the money that the courses will
generate, SmartForce,Zoologic,the Kaplan Colleges,PrimeLearning
Professional Development Learning Center SmartForce,Zoologic,the
Kaplan Colleges,PrimeLearning Professional Development Learning
Center
Slide 26
Possible Priorities 1.Address a clear learner need 2.Leverage
resources; share infrastructure 3.Respond to new markets; improve
competitiveness 4.Enhance access and pedagogy of learning
Slide 27
University Resource Partnership 3/3/02 DSpace Archive: MIT and
HP to create a LT sustainable digital repository3/3/02 DSpace
Archive: MIT and HP to create a LT sustainable digital repository
Instead of submitting the paper to a print commercial journal and
waiting months for the results to be published, the researcher can
simply pull up MITs Center of Teleportation Research Web page and
instandly submit the paper and data online, for all his cohorts to
review. Kendra Mayfield Wired News, College Archives Dig Deeper.
http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,54229,00.htmlhttp://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,54229,00.html
Slide 28
University Resource Partnership
Slide 29
Administrators and faculty members at the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology are debating what could become a
$100-million effort to create extensive World Wide Web pages for
nearly every course the university offers. Jeffrey R. Young, March
1, 2001, The Chronicle of Higher Ed Also See: MIT Cheered from a
Distance, Wired News,
http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,42841,00.html
University-World Resource Partnership
Slide 30
Cross-University Partnerships 1/23/01 The Alliance of
Four1/23/01 The Alliance of Four 4 Universities Create an Alliance
Against Onslight of Technology Vendors4 Universities Create an
Alliance Against Onslight of Technology Vendors UC-Berkeley, Penn
State Univ World Campus, Univ of Washington, and Univ of Wisconsin
Learning Innovations formed an (informal) alliance to make joint
technology purchases. Trying to deal with vendors who besiege
universities and pick them off one at a time
Slide 31
State Resource Partnership
Slide 32
National Resource Partnership
Slide 33
Publishers Technology Distribution Software Developers Book
Publishers Hollywood Producers Newspapers On-Line Services Cable
Companies Broadcasters Telephone Cos. Computer Nets Retail Stores
ISDN MPEG/DVI Photo CD HDTV QuickTime OS/2 Windows USERS
National/Intl Resource Partnership Learning Object Standards
Slide 34
International Resource Partnership
Slide 35
Other Resource Partnerships 22 virtual universities to
collaborate 9 universities on 4 continents collab to offer online
graduate and professional development courses in Asia University of
the Arctic is a consortium of 31 high latitude colleges,
universities, and governments across 8 countries. First course is
Introduction to Circumpolar Studies. (Feb. 15, 2002, Chronicle of
HE).
Slide 36
Possible Priorities 1.Address a clear learner need 2.Leverage
resources; share infrastructure 3.Respond to new markets; improve
competitiveness 4.Enhance access and pedagogy of learning
Slide 37
Slide 38
Level 3 University Partnerships (Dan Carnevale, Chronicle of
Higher Ed, Jan 28, 2002) Babson College MBA for IntelBabson College
MBA for Intel Oregon Health and Science Univ MA in Tech Management
for MicrosoftOregon Health and Science Univ MA in Tech Management
for Microsoft UT-Austin Online MS in Science, Tech, and
Commercialization for IBMUT-Austin Online MS in Science, Tech, and
Commercialization for IBM Univ of Georgia MBA for
PricewaterhouseCoopersUniv of Georgia MBA for
PricewaterhouseCoopers Cenquest, President, LaVonne Reimer claims
courses are more relevant to occupations (colleges target corp
training and exec ed)Cenquest, President, LaVonne Reimer claims
courses are more relevant to occupations (colleges target corp
training and exec ed)
Slide 39
Not All Partnerships Work 6/9/01 Faculty wary of
e-Cornell6/9/01 Faculty wary of e-Cornell 6/1/01 Company that sells
Dukes online MBA program (Pensare) files for bankruptcy6/1/01
Company that sells Dukes online MBA program (Pensare) files for
bankruptcy 8/7/01 UNext asks to restructure its relationshsips with
CMU,Stanford, Columbia8/7/01 UNext asks to restructure its
relationshsips with CMU,Stanford, Columbia 9/13/01 UNext lays off
135 employees9/13/01 UNext lays off 135 employees 12/14/01 Debating
the demise of NYUonline12/14/01 Debating the demise of NYUonline
5/2/02 US Open University will close5/2/02 US Open University will
close 2/20/02 SUNY-Buffalo drops online MBA2/20/02 SUNY-Buffalo
drops online MBA
Slide 40
Reasons for Failure UNext--Difficult economic period; cited
challenges of raising venture capitalUNext--Difficult economic
period; cited challenges of raising venture capital US Open
UInsufficient revenues; inadequate enrollments; lacking
accreditation & name recUS Open UInsufficient revenues;
inadequate enrollments; lacking accreditation & name rec
E-Cornelldiff from mission; out of thin airE-Cornelldiff from
mission; out of thin air Pensare/Dukelower interest than expected
and then market tightenedPensare/Dukelower interest than expected
and then market tightened NUYonlineinadequate business plan
(similar problems to UMUConline, Virtual Temple,
etc.)NUYonlineinadequate business plan (similar problems to
UMUConline, Virtual Temple, etc.) SUNY-Buffalonot worth expense
& hassleSUNY-Buffalonot worth expense & hassle Labor
intensive courses, time consuming, etc.
Slide 41
Some Partners are Not Strong Katherine Mangan, Chronicle of HE,
Feb 20, 2002 Like several other business schools whose efforts to
expand online have been derailed, Buffalo was burned by an outside
partner that failed to live up to its promisesThe Albany-based
Institute for Entrepreneurship, which ran into financial and
management problems, gave the school only about $65,000 of the
$200,000 it had promised.Like several other business schools whose
efforts to expand online have been derailed, Buffalo was burned by
an outside partner that failed to live up to its promisesThe
Albany-based Institute for Entrepreneurship, which ran into
financial and management problems, gave the school only about
$65,000 of the $200,000 it had promised.
Slide 42
IU Online MBA Homepage
Slide 43
Some Facts The Indiana University Kelley School of Business,
for more than eighty years, has been one of the countrys premier
business schools.The Indiana University Kelley School of Business,
for more than eighty years, has been one of the countrys premier
business schools. The undergraduate program is ranked among the top
10 in the country.The undergraduate program is ranked among the top
10 in the country. The MBA program is ranked by BusinessWeek as
among the top 20.The MBA program is ranked by BusinessWeek as among
the top 20. The MBA faculty have the top threeThe MBA faculty have
the top three teaching faculty in the country.
Slide 44
IU Oncourse Partnership (now ANGEL?)
Slide 45
Slide 46
Slide 47
Kelley Direct Partnership with GM Joint program with Purdue
School of Engineering and Continuing EducationJoint program with
Purdue School of Engineering and Continuing Education Obtain MBA
online after complete engineering MSObtain MBA online after
complete engineering MS 48 credits normal (cut to 42 in here)48
credits normal (cut to 42 in here) March 2002 35 in programMarch
2002 35 in program 100 waiting to get in100 waiting to get in Take
1 courses/quarter (3 yr program)Take 1 courses/quarter (3 yr
program)
Slide 48
Partnership with GM MS in Finance (20 students)MS in Finance
(20 students) MS in Strategic Management (15-20 sts)MS in Strategic
Management (15-20 sts) 30 credits30 credits 1 course/quarter1
course/quarter 3 year program3 year program
Slide 49
Partnership with United Technologies MBA, began spring 2002MBA,
began spring 2002 MS in Global Supply Chain ManagementMS in Global
Supply Chain Management 2 year program2 year program 30 students, 2
courses/quarter30 students, 2 courses/quarter 1 week summer
residency1 week summer residency 1 week at site1 week at site
Slide 50
Partnership with John Deere MS in finance for financial
managersMS in finance for financial managers Just beganJust began
52 credits52 credits 25 students in program25 students in
program
Slide 51
Summary to Date 2 year program with residency2 year program
with residency Started with 14 studentsStarted with 14 students Now
have 240 total in MBA programsNow have 240 total in MBA programs
Graduated 60 MBA students to dateGraduated 60 MBA students to date
Gain students though networking, customer contacts, etc.Gain
students though networking, customer contacts, etc.
Slide 52
1.Key component in many recruiting strategies. 2.Assists firms
in retaining their most valued employees. 3.Since the program has a
very small in- residence component, there is little disruption to
an employees work schedule. Conclusion The Online MBA program is
designed to be beneficial to the employer of a student as
well:
Slide 53
Slide 54
Slide 55
Slide 56
Possible Priorities 1.Address a clear learner need 2.Leverage
resources; share infrastructure 3.Respond to new markets; improve
competitiveness 4.Enhance access and pedagogy of learning
Slide 57
Videoconferencing at IU
Slide 58
1.Members pay $10,000 per year to join 2.Full access to
software and its source code 3.Documents and evaluates student
achievements and learning improvements 4.Students reflect on work
and instructors reflect on their quality 5.Help students transfer
6.Learning benchmarks can be established IUPUI & UCLA
e-Portfolios http://eportconsortium.org
Slide 59
Learning to Teach with Technology Studio (Partnership of IU and
PBS)
Slide 60
A New Type of Professional Development The Learning to Teach
with Technology Studio is a Web-based professional development
system offering quality instruction in quality K - 12 technology
integration designed for educators.
Slide 61
LTTS Features Short courses (25 growing to 55+) On the web
Start anytime and move at own pace Focus on technology integration
in inquiry lessons and projects Problem-centered modules Practical
and educational Facilitated Standards-based (ISTE NETS and national
academic standards)
Slide 62
TICKIT: Rural Teacher Technology Integration
Slide 63
Overview of TICKIT In-service teacher education program Rural
schools in southern Indiana Yearlong, 25 teachers from 5 schools
Primarily school-based Supported by participating school systems,
Arthur Vining Davis Foundations and Indiana University
Slide 64
Slide 65
Quality on the Line: Benchmarks for Success in Internet-Based
Distance Ed (Blackboard & NEA, 2000) Teaching/Learning Process
Student interaction with faculty is facilitated through a variety
of ways.Student interaction with faculty is facilitated through a
variety of ways. Feedback to student assignments and questions is
provided in a timely manner.Feedback to student assignments and
questions is provided in a timely manner. Each module requires
students to engage themselves in analysis, synthesis, and
evaluation as part of their course assignments.Each module requires
students to engage themselves in analysis, synthesis, and
evaluation as part of their course assignments. Course materials
promote collaboration among students.Course materials promote
collaboration among students.
http://www.ihep.com/Pubs/PDF/Quality.pdf
Slide 66
Quality on the Line: Benchmarks for Success in Internet-Based
Distance Ed (Blackboard & NEA, 2000) Other Benchmark
Categories: Institutional Support: incentive, rewards,
plansInstitutional Support: incentive, rewards, plans Course
Development: processes, guidelines, teams, structures, standards,
learning stylesCourse Development: processes, guidelines, teams,
structures, standards, learning styles Course Structure:
expectations, resourcesCourse Structure: expectations, resources
Student Support: training, assistance, infoStudent Support:
training, assistance, info Faculty Support: mentoring, tech
supportFaculty Support: mentoring, tech support Evaluation and
Assessment: review process, multiple methods, specific
standardsEvaluation and Assessment: review process, multiple
methods, specific standards
Slide 67
E-Learning: Harnessing the hype. Cohen & Payiatakis (2002,
Feb). Performance Improvement, 41(7), 7-15. both instructional and
graphic (design)must be compelling and engaging enough to keep the
learner involved, interested, and stimulatedThe ideal future is a
learning experience designed to be memorable, motivational, and
magical if it is to make a lasting impact on the capabilities of
the learner.
Slide 68
Online Courseware Development Partnerships Rather than every
large higher education institution attempting to spend money to
develop its own courseware platform or shell, colleges and
universities should seek partnerships with courseware and other
e-learning companies wherein they serve as beta test sites for new
tool development efforts. They might also seek to form tool
development consortia with other institutions. (Bonk, 2001) Online
Teaching in an Online World.
Slide 69
Online Learning Pedagogy Partnerships In conjunction with the
last recommendation, higher education institutions need to demand
and perhaps help develop and research different types of
pedagogical tools for e-learning that foster student higher-order
thinking and collaboration. Once developed, online tools that
target critical and creative thinking as well as teamwork online
should be showcased for faculty, students, and administrators.
(Bonk, 2001) Online Teaching in an Online World.
Slide 70
Ideas Develop a joint programDevelop a joint program Locate the
best resources and bring them to learners via a learning
marketspaceLocate the best resources and bring them to learners via
a learning marketspace Promote collective virtual learning
resources to the worldPromote collective virtual learning resources
to the world Make credits transferable between programsMake credits
transferable between programs Partner with private companies to
assist learners with additional experiencesPartner with private
companies to assist learners with additional experiences
Slide 71
Readiness: What factors most determine success?
Slide 72
Readiness The probability of success is dependent on many
factorsthe basic premise is that a universitys preparation or
readiness prior to a partnership initiation is the single most
important contributor to success. Robinson & Daigle, 1999, p.
4. Robinson & Daigle, 1999, p. 4.
Slide 73
State Readiness Criteria Rosevears study of 8 virtual
universitiesRosevears study of 8 virtual universities What is the
states technological infrastructure?What is the states
technological infrastructure? How prepared are the traditional
colleges and universities to support virtual learning
environments?How prepared are the traditional colleges and
universities to support virtual learning environments? Do they all
have equal technological capabilities?Do they all have equal
technological capabilities? What is a reasonable prediction for how
long it will take before the virtual university is operational?What
is a reasonable prediction for how long it will take before the
virtual university is operational? What are the resources gaps, and
how will they be filled?What are the resources gaps, and how will
they be filled?
Slide 74
Inter-Institutional Readiness Criteria Leadership committed to
the effortLeadership committed to the effort Commitment to learner
centered educationCommitment to learner centered education Climate
to support partnership and changeClimate to support partnership and
change Alignment of key decision makersAlignment of key decision
makers Buy-in by faculty, departments, and collegesBuy-in by
faculty, departments, and colleges
Slide 75
Readiness criteria for shared course environments Similar
problemsSimilar problems Trust and respectTrust and respect Low
level permissionsLow level permissions No $$ or creditNo $$ or
credit Clear communicationClear communication Clear outcomesClear
outcomes Delineation of tasks Matrix development Phase one
prototype Course offered again Equivalent tech infrastructures
In-house mentoring
Slide 76
What is your institutions partnership rationale?
Slide 77
Partnership Rationales Dave King (IHETS):Dave King (IHETS): Our
rationale is that we choose partners based on learner needs and
risk. The learners risk must be low. Technology is never complete
until the user is satisfied. Susan Kannel (NACTEL):Susan Kannel
(NACTEL): Our rationale is that we choose a college or university
partner based on quality online curricula needed by industry. Bruce
Chaloux (SREB):Bruce Chaloux (SREB): Our rationale is to use
partnerships to level the playing field (policy development) on
behalf of student access.
Slide 78
Partnership Rationale -- Blueprint VisionVision
DescriptionDescription BeliefsBeliefs AssumptionsAssumptions
OperationsOperations CommitmentCommitment Collaboration Risk
Control Adaptation Return on Investment
Slide 79
John Chambers Partnership Rationale (criteria) Do the partners
enjoy a shared vision with complementary roles?Do the partners
enjoy a shared vision with complementary roles? Can the partners
create short-term wins?Can the partners create short-term wins?
Does the partnership create a win for all key stakeholders?Does the
partnership create a win for all key stakeholders? Are the
organizational cultures similar?Are the organizational cultures
similar? Is there geographic proximity?Is there geographic
proximity?
Slide 80
What is your institutions risk tolerance related to
partnerships? -- legal -- financial -- experimental --
academic
Slide 81
Types and Levels of Risk Associated with Partnerships Commerce
Alliance Minority equity investment Joint Venture Spin off Merger
or acquisition LegalLowLowLowMediumHigh FinancialLowLowLowHighHigh
ExperimentationLowLowMediumHighHigh
AcademicMediumMediumMediumHighHigh
Slide 82
Consider your current partnerships. What is your potential
return on investment? Learner/Citizen Faculty Campus State
Slide 83
Adding Value The magnitude, form, source, and distribution of
that value is at the heart of relational dynamics. The perceived
worth of an alliance is the ultimate determinant of, first, whether
it will be created and, second, whether it will be sustained. The
magnitude, form, source, and distribution of that value is at the
heart of relational dynamics. The perceived worth of an alliance is
the ultimate determinant of, first, whether it will be created and,
second, whether it will be sustained. --James Austin, 2000, The
Collaboration Challenge, 87 --James Austin, 2000, The Collaboration
Challenge, 87
Slide 84
ROI for Iowa State University Commerce Alliance Fathom Minority
investment PBS and IU Joint Venture IUPUI & UCLA Joint Venture
Purdue-IU & GM Spin off Wisdom Tools & IIPI Learners /
citizens HighHighHighHighMedium FacultyMediumMediumMediumMediumLow
CampusLowLowMediumHighMedium StateMediumMediumMediumHighHigh
Slide 85
ROI: What is the return on e-learning???
Slide 86
Business ROI Objectives Better Efficiencies (reduced travel,
instructor fees, distribution and facilities costs)Better
Efficiencies (reduced travel, instructor fees, distribution and
facilities costs) Greater ProfitabilityGreater Profitability
Increased SalesIncreased Sales Fewer Injuries on the JobFewer
Injuries on the Job Less Time off WorkLess Time off Work Faster
Time to CompetencyFaster Time to Competency
Slide 87
ROI in Higher Education Students: opportunities, integration
with work, learning on demand, inc promotion, new wealthStudents:
opportunities, integration with work, learning on demand, inc
promotion, new wealth Faculty: templates for dev curric,
integration with real world, time, $Faculty: templates for dev
curric, integration with real world, time, $ Campus: educating
more, reaching local community, expanding resource base, dispersing
costsCampus: educating more, reaching local community, expanding
resource base, dispersing costs State: economic devel, increased
business competitiveness, better resource allocationState: economic
devel, increased business competitiveness, better resource
allocation
Slide 88
Talking about ROI As a percentageAs a percentage ROI=[(Payback-
Investment)/Investment]* 100 As a ratioAs a ratio
ROI=Return/Investment As time to break evenAs time to break even
Break even time=(Investment/Return) *Time Period
Slide 89
More Calculations Total Admin Costs of Former Program - Total
Admin Costs of OL Program =Projected Net SavingsTotal Admin Costs
of Former Program - Total Admin Costs of OL Program =Projected Net
Savings Total Cost of Training/# of Students =Cost Per Student
(CPS)Total Cost of Training/# of Students =Cost Per Student (CPS)
Total Benefits * 100/Total Program Cost =ROI%Total Benefits *
100/Total Program Cost =ROI%
Level 1 Comments. Reactions We assess our courses based on
participation levels and online surveys after course completion.
All of our courses are asynchronous. Typically involves Smile
sheets or end- of-training evaluation forms. Easy to collect, but
not always very useful. We use the Halo Survey process of asking
them when the course is concluding.
Slide 92
Kirkpatrick Level 3: Behavior Can learner apply what learned?
Might include:Can learner apply what learned? Might include: Direct
observation by supervisors or coaches (Wisher, Curnow, &
Drenth, 2001). Questionnaires completed by peers, supervisors, and
subordinates related to work performance. On the job behaviors,
automatically logged performances, or self-report data. Shepard, C.
(1999b, July). Evaluating online learning. TACTIX from Fastrak
Consulting. Retrieved February 10, 2002, from:
http://fastrak-consulting.co.uk/tactix/Features/evaluate/eval01.htm.
Slide 93
Kirkpatrick Level 4: Results Often compared to return on
investment (ROI)Often compared to return on investment (ROI) In
e-learning, it is believed that the increased cost of course
development ultimately is offset by the lesser cost of training
implementationIn e-learning, it is believed that the increased cost
of course development ultimately is offset by the lesser cost of
training implementation A new way of training may require a new way
of measuring impactA new way of training may require a new way of
measuring impact
Slide 94
Kirkpatrick Level 4: Results Might Include:Might Include: Labor
savings (e.g., reduced duplication of effort or faster access to
needed information). Production increases (faster turnover of
inventory, forms processed, accounts opened, etc.). Direct cost
savings (e.g., reduced cost per project, lowered overhead costs,
reduction of bad debts, etc.). Quality improvements (e.g., fewer
accidents, less defects, etc.). Horton, W. (2001). Evaluating
e-learning. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training &
Development. Of course, this assumes you have all the
documents!
Slide 95
My Evaluation Plan
Slide 96
What about specific courseware or LMS and other
considerations???
Slide 97
Online Program or Course Budget Indirect Costs: learner disk
space, coordination, phone, admin training, creating student
criteria, accreditation, integration with existing technology and
procedures, library resources, on site orientation & tech
training, faculty training, office space, suppliesIndirect Costs:
learner disk space, coordination, phone, admin training, creating
student criteria, accreditation, integration with existing
technology and procedures, library resources, on site orientation
& tech training, faculty training, office space, supplies
Direct Costs: courseware, instructor, business manager, help desk,
books, seat time, bandwidth and data communications, server, server
back-up, course developers, postageDirect Costs: courseware,
instructor, business manager, help desk, books, seat time,
bandwidth and data communications, server, server back-up, course
developers, postage
Slide 98
Online Program or Course Budget
http://webpages.marshall.edu/~morgan16/onlinecosts/
[email protected] Questions to ask How large a course?How
large a course? Technology fees charged?Technology fees charged?
Projected growth rate?Projected growth rate? Number of
courses?Number of courses? How pay for system and use?How pay for
system and use? Tuition rate?Tuition rate?
Slide 99
Vendor Selection True commitment to learningcan define what
learning is.True commitment to learningcan define what learning is.
24 x 7 support24 x 7 support PartnershipsPartnerships Any research,
reports, or funded centers?Any research, reports, or funded
centers? LongevityLongevity Honest talk and less hypeHonest talk
and less hype
Slide 100
What steps in getting it work? Institutional support/White
PaperInstitutional support/White Paper Identify goals, policies,
assess plans, resources (hardware, software, support, people)
Faculty qualifications & compensationFaculty qualifications
& compensation Audience Needs: student or corporateAudience
Needs: student or corporate Finding Funding & PartneringFinding
Funding & Partnering Test softwareTest software usability
testing system compatibility fits tech plans
Slide 101
How to get buy-In? Lets form a committeeat least oneLets form a
committeeat least one Needs analysis, interviews, focus groupsNeeds
analysis, interviews, focus groups Mini-grants, stipends, (i.,e.,
MONEY!!!)Mini-grants, stipends, (i.,e., MONEY!!!) Success stories,
sharing, PRSuccess stories, sharing, PR Involve all stakeholders in
the DM processInvolve all stakeholders in the DM process
Slide 102
Marketing Listed in Major Search Engines (Free in Yahoo! or pay
for top listing; premium listing in GradSchools.com)Listed in Major
Search Engines (Free in Yahoo! or pay for top listing; premium
listing in GradSchools.com) Bulletin BoardsUsenet Newsgroups
(alt.education.distance)Bulletin BoardsUsenet Newsgroups
(alt.education.distance) Specific Web Sites for DomainSpecific Web
Sites for Domain Mailing Listsemail to subscriborsMailing
Listsemail to subscribors Internal PRInternal PR Conference
Presentations and PubsConference Presentations and Pubs Make
Academic Advisors AwareMake Academic Advisors Aware
Slide 103
How to Fail at e-Learning (Brooke Broadbent, e-learning,
January 2001, p. 36-37) Thinking training, not businessThinking
training, not business Promise the moon (e.g., 50% cut in
costs)Promise the moon (e.g., 50% cut in costs) Outsource
everything (hire consultants)Outsource everything (hire
consultants) Simply make e-learning available (instead select
target groups and help change)Simply make e-learning available
(instead select target groups and help change) Force e-learning on
resistersForce e-learning on resisters Dont evaluateDont
evaluate
Slide 104
Not all partnerships necessarily will be long-term ones, but
the commitment to partnering must be long term to counteract the
competing forces working to maintain the status quo To the extent
these portfolios develop will depend on the vision of the possible
provided by all those involved. --Ann Hill Duin and Linda L. Baer,
2002, NLII Final Quote