Upload
damon-wright
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Takahiro Yamada
Assistant ChiefMETIAgency for Natural Resources and Energy
26th APEC EGNRET
April 4, 2006
Auckland, New Zealand
Private Sector Activities in Domestic New and Renewable Energy Technologies in
Japan
Hiroyuki Kato-Deputy Director
Ken Johnson-Advisor
NEDOInternational Projects Management Division
2
New & Renewable Energy Utilization Targets
0
5
10
15
20
2002 410 2.2%
2010 2030 Target: 425 MKOE
(4.5%)
Biomass power generation ( 0.34)Biomass heat utilization ( 3.1)Black liquor, woody waste (4.7)Waste heat utilizationNon-use energySolar thermal utilizationWaste power generationWind power generationPhotovoltaic generation
New
ene
rgy
sum
tot
al(M
KO
E)
Biomass
Bioenergy9.2
19.1
4.74.8
4.8
1.5 2.1
5.5
PV
20024102.2%
20304254.5%
Year:Total Energy
Consumption:N&RE Share:
(excluding hydroelectric generation)
Wind Power
10.5
(Unit: MKOE: Million Kiloliter Oil Equivalent)
3
Cumulative Installed PV Capacity
IEA/PVPS Task 1,“Trends in Photovoltaic Applications,” Sept. 2005
US365MW(14%)
Photovoltaics:
4
Production Capacity and Overseas Development
Manufacturers
(materials)
Domestic cell production capacity (MW) Overseas module production
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 After 2006
SHARP Corporation(Single crystal Si, polycrystal Si, thin-film Si solar cells)
54 94 200 248 315↓
400
500 Currently planning U.S.: 20MW (2003)→40MW( 2004)→120MWEngland: 20MW (2003)→50MW (2005)→110MW (2006)
Kyocera Corporation(Polycrystal Si, spherical Si solar cells)
72 72 72 100 150 240 Currently planning China: 15MW (2003)→30MW(2004)Mexico: 12MW (2004)→36MW (2005)Czechoslovakia: 12MW (2005)→60MW (2006)
SANYO Electric Co., Ltd.(a-Si/single crystal Si, thin-film Si solar cells)
23 31 35 68 160 160 250 (2007)1,000(2010)
Mexico: 10MW (2003)→12MW (2005)Hungary: 50MW (2005)→100MW (2006)
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation(Polycrystal Si solar cells)
15 25 35 50 90 135 230 (2006) -
Kaneka Corporation(Thin-film Si solar cells)
20 20 20 20 20 20 70 -Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.(Thin-film Si solar cells)
- Pilot 10 10 10 10 50 -
Hitachi, Ltd.(Single crystal Si solar cells)
- - - 6 – 8 6 – 8 10 Currently planning -Showa Shell Sekiyu K.K.(CIS solar cells)
- - - - - - 20 (2007) -Honda Motor Co., Ltd.(CIS solar cells)
- - - 2.8 2.8 2.8 27.5 -Fuji Electric Holdings Co., Ltd.(Thin-film Si solar cells)
- - - - 3 3 15 (2006)30 (2008) -
Source: RTS Corporation, PV Activites in Japan, Vol. 16, No. 1
Photovoltaics: Japanese Solar Cell Manufacturers
5
Photovoltaics:Private Sector Activities/ChallengesSharp Corporation•Strengthen marketing to domestic industrial users, increase industrial sales from 10% 30%•Expect total PV sales of $1.67B in 2006
Kyocera Corporation•Developed low-cost granular-silicon solar cells (Silicon granules <1mm in diameter)
Sanyo Electric Co.•Expand investments to increase PV production capacity•Domestically: 160MW (2005) 250MW (2007)•Internationally: 50MW (2005) 100MW (2006)
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation•Developed system to forecast PV generation by monitoring cloud movement with camera; Benefits: effective use of backup power, less impact on power grids
Tokuyama Corporation•Largest Japanese producer of polysilicon (#2 worldwide)•Researching feasibility of Vapor to Liquid Deposition (VLD) technology to overcome worldwide shortage of polysilicon supply
Showa Shell Sekiyu•Will commence silicon-free, thin-film CIS (Copper, Indium, Selenium) PV cell production in 2007
Source: RTS Corporation, PV Activites in Japan, Vol. 16, No. 1
6
Photovoltaics:Showa Shell Sekiyu: CIS Solar Cell Modules
7
Photovoltaics:Main Elements of CIS Solar Cells
Cu ・・・・ Copper
In ・・・・ Indium Se ・・・・ Selenium
・ ・ ・ ・ ・→Thin-film CIS Solar Cell Module
s
8
Photovoltaics:Categories of Solar Cells
Solar cell
Bulk
Thin-film
Silicon
Compound
Silicon
Compound
Single crystal
Polycrystal
Gallium arsenic, etc
Amorphous
CIS solar cell
( For special use: e.g. space technologies; most efficient)
(Outdated but relatively high efficiency)
(Widely disseminated and most common; More easily manufactured than single crystal)
( Requires fewer materials but several performance challenges remain)
( Simple manufacturing process,high performance anticipated)
Manufactured by carving out of thick material
Thin-film created on substrate
Mostutilized
9
Photovoltaics:Advantages of CIS Solar Cells
CIS
Performance:・ Highest energy conversion efficiency among all thin-film solar cells
・ Highest light absorbance of all semiconductors
・ Excellent durability
Performance:・ Highest energy conversion efficiency among all thin-film solar cells
・ Highest light absorbance of all semiconductors
・ Excellent durability
Technology developed by
Showa Shell Sekiyu K.K.・ 13 years of R&D experience (NEDO entrusted research activities)
・ Top performing thin-film solar cells in the world
・ Patented technology
Technology developed by
Showa Shell Sekiyu K.K.・ 13 years of R&D experience (NEDO entrusted research activities)
・ Top performing thin-film solar cells in the world
・ Patented technology
Potential to be the mainstream of the next-generation of solar cells:・ Stable supply of raw material (not dependant on silicon)
・ Highly productive manufacturing process
・ Further development anticipated under NEDO’s “Development of Advanced Solar Cells and Modules” project
Potential to be the mainstream of the next-generation of solar cells:・ Stable supply of raw material (not dependant on silicon)
・ Highly productive manufacturing process
・ Further development anticipated under NEDO’s “Development of Advanced Solar Cells and Modules” project
Low cost potential:・ Simple module structure/manufacturing process
・ Low raw material utilization
・ Integrated manufacturing: from raw materials to end products
Low cost potential:・ Simple module structure/manufacturing process
・ Low raw material utilization
・ Integrated manufacturing: from raw materials to end products
10
Photovoltaics:Solar Cell Structure
Light
Anti-reflective coating
n type silicon
p type silicon
Electrode
Electrode
Crystalline-Si Solar Cell(Conventional type)
Crystalline-Si Solar Cell(Conventional type)
Thickness:
200~ 300μm vs. 2~3μm
Transparent electrode
BufferCIS compound
Electrode+
--
-
-++
-
+
+- - - -
+ +
-
+
CIS Solar CellCIS Solar Cell
Light
11
Photovoltaics:Comparison: CIS vs. Crystalline Silicon
Characteristics CISEvaluati
onCrystalline
siliconAdvantages of
CIS
Silicon usage A > D Not dependant on silicon
Appearance A > C Black color stands out less
Manufacturing cost
A > B Possible cost reduction anticipated
Manufacturing process
B > CSimple manufacturing process: integrated manufacturing process possible
Environmental friendliness
A > B Exceeds others in environmental friendliness
Energy Payback Time (EPT)
A > B Less energy consumption during manufacturing
Conversion efficiency
B < A
12
Photovoltaics:Appearance of CIS Solar Cells
CISSolar Cells
ConventionalCrystalline Silicon
Solar Cells
13
Wind Power Generation in JapanG
en
era
tin
g
cap
acit
y (
kW
)
Tu
rbin
es
14
Wind Power Players in Japan
Private Sector Farms MW
Euras Energy 9 184
EcoPower 10 70Green Power 2 39WindTech 4 38Rokkasho Mura Wind Pwr 1 33Toyota 2 31Minami Kyushu Wind Pwr 2 26Nigaho Kogen Wind Pwr 1 25J Wind 2 24Horonobe Wind Power 1 21
Esashi Wind Power 1 21Others 156 326Total: 134 players 191 838
Public Sector Farms MW
49 Cities 56 53
10 Prefectures 13 20
NEDO 25 11
JOGMEC 1 1.5
(Japan Oil, Gas & Metals Nat’l. Corp.)
Ministry of Land, Infra. & Trans. 1 .3
Total: 62 players 96 86
15
Wind Power Generation System Introduction (Total number of imported/domestic turbines)
海外機と国産機の導入基数の推移
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
年 度
基 数
Imported 0 0 0 2 5 7 16 23 40 72 136 193 368 499 636 746
Domestic 9 9 14 21 28 37 38 43 49 55 62 66 66 77 106 178
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Fiscal year
Tu
rbin
es
16
Wind Power Generation System Introduction (Total generation capacity of imported/domestic systems)
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1,000,000
Fiscal year
Cap
acity
(kW
)
Imported
Domestic
Imported 0 0 0 350 650 1,150 3,975 6,133 12,302 25,712 66,887 126,207 292,862 439,262 637,942 810,952
Domestic 1,215 1,015 2,541 3,124 4,323 6,430 6,446 7,579 9,236 12,110 15,750 17,537 19,895 24,948 42,723 115,623
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
17
Wind Power Generation Systems
Total generation capacity of domestic makers' systems in Japan increased sharply in 2004.
Most domestically supplied turbines were produced by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) Japan. MHI was #8 in turbines worldwide in 2004.*
Fuji Heavy Industries developing new 2MW system to obtain share in Japanese market.Features:
Downwind rotor for typhoon conditions Blade and Nacelle transportable in pieces
Japanese makers increasingly capable of manufacturing 2MW turbines.
*http://www.earthscan.co.uk/news/printablearticle.asp?sp=636487402740206174292&v=3&UAN=431
18
Biomass Resources and Biomass Energy Utilization
Wood
Food
Agricultural, livestock, fishery Construction waste
Household waste
Pulp & paper
Biomass Resources
Dry
Moist
Others
Woody biomass
Forestry wasteScrap timber
Agricultural waste
Rice strawMaize
Rice husksWheat straw
Construction waste wood
Sewage sludge
Excreta
Garbage
Used cooking oil
Bagasse
Food industry waste water/food
waste
Seafood processing waste
Black liquorScrap wood
Cellulose(recycled paper)
Bagasse
Livestock excrement
Cattle/hogs/poultry
Fisheries waste
Sugar/starch
RapeseedPalm oil
Biomass Energy Utilization
Direct combustion
Biochemical conversion
Thermo-chemical conversion
Power generation/
Transportation
Crushed into chips or pelletized for boiler combustion
Methane/Ethanol/Hydrogen generation via fermentation, etc.
Fuel generation by gasification/esterifica-tion/slurrying through high-temperature and high-pressure process, etc.
19
Biomass Utilization—Chugai Ro Woody Biomass Gasification and Co-generation System (1/2)
Japan’s first co-generation system incorporating a gas engine generator.Effective use of woody biomass resources while reducing CO2 emissions.
20
Biomass Utilization—Chugai Ro Woody Biomass Gasification and Co-generation System (2/2)
Benefits:
•Efficient thermal decomposition and gasification
•Efficient electric power recovery
•Recovery of thermal energy
•Gas reforming tower for tar removal
•Enables effective use of by-products
1100℃
Gasification kiln
Oxygen
External heat type
multi-retort kiln
700~ 850℃
Residue(Char and ash)
Preheated air
Hot-air generator
Airpreheater
Gas engine generator
ElectricPower
176kW(20.1%)
Hot Water 73kW(8.4%)
Steam201kW(23.0%)
Biomass Material
5t/d
Hopper
Gas reformer
Gas filter
Gas holder
Waste heat
boiler
GasCooler
Gasfilter
900℃
21
Bio-ethanol Demonstrative Projects in Japan
[MOE]
3. Sakai-city, Osaka (Taisei Corporation, Marubeni Corporation, Osaka municipal government)
2. Shinjyo-city, Yamagata Pref. [MOAFF]
4. Kuse-cho, Okayama Pref. (Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding Co., Ltd.)[METI]
6. Miyako-island, Okinawa Pref. (Ryuseki)
5. Ie island, Okinawa Pref. (Asahi Breweries, Ltd.)
1. Tokachi, Hokkaido (Tokachi Zaidan, etc.)
[METI / MOE]
[METI / MOAFF / MOE / CAO]
Ethanol manufacturing from substandard wheatand maize/E3 (gasohol) demonstration
Ethanol manufacturing from sorgum/E3 (gasohol) demonstration
Ethanol manufacturing from construction waste/E3 (gasohol) demonstration
Demonstrative manufacturing of ethanol from mill ends
Ethanol manufacturing from sugarcane/E3 (gasohol) demonstration
Ethanol manufacturing from sugarcane/E3 (gasohol) demonstration
[METI / MOAFF / MOE / CAO]
22
Biomass Utilization—Mitsui Engineering and Shipbuilding
Bioethanol Demonstration Plant• Cellulosic ethanol demonstration plant using wo
od-based feedstock (June 2005)
• Feedstocks derived from wood chips and waste
wood collected from forestry industry
• Sugar mixed with yeast for fermentation
• MES’ Zeolite membrane used to obtain absolute
ethanol
• Production capacity: 250kg of absolute ethanol/day
• Capable of processing 2 tons of wood waste/da
y
23
BIOMASS:Oil Industry Efforts for Bioethanol Introduction
Japanese Government announced (January 18, 2006) implementation of “Utilization
of Biomass Fuels for Transportation,” as part of its “Kyoto Protocol Target Achievement
Plan,” under the following policies/conditions:
1) Members of the Petroleum Association of Japan shall be actively engaged in blending bioethanol fuel for transportation. Target blend 20% of gasoline (bioethanol ETBE) by 2010. (Approximately 360,000KL/year = approximately 210,000KL/year crude oil equivalent)
2) Bioethanol introduction shall not: a) negatively impact air quality, or b) compromise safety or automobile performance.
3) Risk assessments necessary for mixing ETBE with gasoline must be conducted prior to bioethanol introduction, since ETBE is designated as one of the “TYPE Monitoring ⅡChemical Substances” of “the Chemical Substances Control Law.”
24
BIOMASS: ETBE Introduction Scale (1/3)- For a stable and long-term supply
1) Ethanol, a raw material for ETBE, is limited in supply
Brazil is the only major ethanol exporter
↓ Other countries such as U.S. and China can only meet domestic consumption Scant ethanol production in Japan
Ethanol Producing Countries (2004/2005)
Production capacity
Brazil 15,000,000 kl
U.S. 14,000,000 kl
China 3,000,000 kl
Europe 2,000,000 kl
Others 7,000,000 kl
World production capacity 41,000,000 kl
25
ETBE Introduction Scale (2/3) - For a stable and long-term supply
2) ETBE is limited in supply
a) Japan’s maximum domestic production capacity if 4 existing, idled MTBE* plants were converted to ETBE production: 400,000 kl/year MTBE was produced until 2001 Maximum domestic isobutene production: approx. 630,000 tons/year
b) Potential overseas supplies of ETBE: Europe: domestic production and consumption of ETBE, but no overcapacity U.S.: MTBE plants exist that could possibly be converted to ETBE production?
*MTBE: methyl tertiary-butyl ether, a fuel synthesized from methanol (from natural gas) and isobutene
Enables maximum annual production of ETBE of 1,500,000kl
26
ETBE Introduction Scale (3/3)- Issue: Economic efficiency relative to conventional fuels
Ethanol vs. gasoline
Ethanol* is 20 to 30 yen/l more expensive than gasoline** when calculated by calorific value equivalence (based on recent import price)
(*Ethanol price: import price (excluding custom duty) of ethanol for industrial and beverage use calculated on an equivalent calorific comparison versus gasoline (60%))
(**Gasoline price: domestic market price excluding taxes (gasoline tax, oil/coal tax and crude oil tax)
Issues: agricultural produce unstable; transportation costs
27
Thank you for your attention!