Table of Contents - gswma.gujarat.gov.ingswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2011-2012/Patan/Pat_IWMP_16.pdf · Table of Contents CHAPTER -1..... 6

Table of Contents CHAPTER -1 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 6

PROJECT BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 6

1.1 Project Background ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7

Table no.1: Basic project information .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 8

1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme............................................................................................................................................................................ 8

Table no.2: Weight age of the project ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 9

Table No. 2.1 Criteria and weight age for selection of watershed .............................................................................................................................................. 11

Table no.3: Watershed information ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 12

Table no.4: Developmental programmers running in the project area ........................................................................................................................................ 13

Source: GP & Talati ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 13

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area .............................................................................................................................................. 14

CHAPTER – 2 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 15

2.1. Project Implementing Agency ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 16

2.2 About District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Patan ................................................................................................................................................ 16

Table no. 6: PIA .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17

2.3 SWOT Analysis of the DWDU ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 18

CHAPTER – 3 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20

BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 20

3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 21

Table no. 8: Land use pattern ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 23

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition ................................................................................................................................................................................. 23

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 24

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) .......................................................................................................................................................... 24

Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions .................................................................................................................................................................................. 25

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 25

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 26

Table no. 14: Land ownership details ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 28

Table no. 15: Agriculture ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 28

Table no. 16: Irrigation ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 29

Table no. 17: Crop details ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30

Table no. 18: Livestock............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32

Table no. 19: Drinking water ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32

3.2. Socio-Economic Profile ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36

Table no. 21: Demographic information ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 36

Table no. 22: Literacy rate .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 37

Table no. 23: Migration details ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 38

Table no. 24: Poverty .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 38

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 39

Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 40

Table no. 27: Per capita Income ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 41

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR ................................................................................................................................................................................... 42

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) .................................................................................................................................................... 42

CHAPTER – 4 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 46

WATERSHED ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 46

4.1. Scientific Planning ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 47

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects ................................................................................................................................ 49

4.2. Institution building ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 50

Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area ...................................................................................................................................... 51

Problem Tree ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 52

Objective Tree ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 53

Table no. 32: Watershed Committee details ............................................................................................................................................................................... 54

Table no. 33: SHG detail ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 59

Table no. 34: UG detail ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 60

4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP-16 Jamvada ............................................................................................................................................... 61

Table no.35: Probable Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) .............................................................................................................. 62

4.3.2. Watershed Development Works: ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 64

Table no.36: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works* .......................................................................................................... 65

36.1 Technical Detail & Model Estimates of Work phase Watershed Work .............................................................................................................................. 68

Table No 36.1.2 Recharging Bore well ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 69

Table No 36.1.3 Technical details of Earth Bund ...................................................................................................................................................................... 71

Table No 36.1.4 Technical details of Waste weir ...................................................................................................................................................................... 72

Table No 36.1.4 Technical details of Field Outlet ..................................................................................................................................................................... 74

Table No 36.1.4 Technical details of Field Bund ...................................................................................................................................................................... 76

Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ..................................................................... 77

Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lack Rs.) .................................................... 80

Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises ............................................................................................ 82

Table 39.1. Primary Model for A Cattle feed centre .................................................................................................................................................................. 85

Table 39.2. Primary Model for Dairy Collection Centre ............................................................................................................................................................. 87

Table 39.3. Primary Model for Cumin Processing Unit .............................................................................................................................................................. 89

Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas .............................................................................................. 91

Table no. 41: Linkages developed at village level ...................................................................................................................................................................... 92

Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works ............................................................................................................ 93

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas.............................................................................................................................................. 94

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution ................................................................................................................................................................................ 95

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 96

Table no.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities ........................................................................................................................................ 98

CHAPTER 5 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 99

BUDGET ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 99

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP (Rs. In Lakh) ................................................................................................. 101

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement ............................................................................................................................................................... 102

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes ....................................................................................................................................... 103

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects ............................................................................................................................................... 104

CHAPTER 6 ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 105

OUTCOME ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 105

Table no.52: Environmental Benefits ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 106

Table no. 53: Status of Drinking water ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 107

Table no. 54:Crop area and yield in the project area ................................................................................................................................................................ 108

Table no. 55: Area under horticulture / other crops .................................................................................................................................................................. 109

Table no. 56: Details of livestock in the project areas .............................................................................................................................................................. 110

Table no. 57: Employment to be supplemented in the Project area .......................................................................................................................................... 111

Table no. 58: Seasonal migration from Project area ................................................................................................................................................................. 112

Table no.59: Per capita Income ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 113

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages ............................................................................................................................................................................... 115

CHAPTER -7 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 116

QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES ............................................................................................................................................................................... 116

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 117

7.2 Plans For Project management ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 117

7.3 Watershed Development Fund ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 118

7.4 User Charges ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 118

CHAPTER -8 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 119

MAPS ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 119

CHAPTER -1

PROJECT BACKGROUND

1.1 Project Background

Jamvada (IWMP-16) project is located in Santalpur Taluka, Patan District of Gujarat state. The project is a cluster of three micro-watersheds with

5H3C1c1#, 5H3C1c2#,6A1B7b2# are being their respective code. There are 5 villages in this watershed with total geographical area 9728.7 ha out

of which total 2009.7 ha is under forest department. The total area of this project is 5610 ha . The villages are Jamvada (950 ha), Daldi (603 ha),

Gadha (1114 ha), Varnosari (653 ha) and Korda (2290 ha).

The nearest town is Varahi which nearly 10-15 km away from the project villages respectively. Varahi is a fast growing city with rapid

urbanisation and well connected with nation highways 27 & 14 due to Solar Park at Charanka Village. The Solar park is the biggest solar park in

India, therefore generating a demand of infrastructure and daily labour in the nearby villages. Charanka is nearly 15km away from the project area.

Ayar ,Rabari, Thakor, Bajaniya, Vadi, Darbar, Patel, Muslim, and SC communities are the primary inhabitants of the village. The livelihood of

these people is based on rainfed agriculture, animal husbandry and as wage labour mainly.

The Project area falls under the Desert Prone Area according to Dolr Classification. The villages of this projects were heavily damaged in a

massive earth quake on Jan 26, 2001, the epicentre of which was Bhuj(Kutch). This has resulted in post-relief activities in the area, especially the

newly constructed cement brick houses with asbestos roofing.

Table no.1: Basic project information

Sl

No.

Name of

the project

Villages

name Census code

Gram

Panchayats Taluka District

Area

of the

project

Area

proposed

to be

treated

Total

project

cost

PIA

1

IWMP-16

(Jamvada)

Jamvada 30010022190000 Jamvada Santalpur Patan

5610

950 142.50

DWDU

Patan

2 Daldi 30010022300000 Daldi Santalpur Patan 603 90.45

3 Gadha 30010022160000 Gadha Santalpur Patan 1114 167.10

4 Varnosari 30010022050000 Kilana Santalpur Patan 653 97.95

5 Korda 30010022180000 Korda Santalpur Patan 2290 343.50

Total

5610 5610 841.50 -

Source: Census

1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme

Watershed Development Programme is prioritised on the basis of thirteen parameters namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual

wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rainfed agriculture, Drinking water situation in

the area, Percentage of the degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, Continuity of another watershed that has already developed/treated,

Cluster approach for plain. Based on these thirteen parameters a composite ranking was given to Jamvada Watershed project as given in table no. 2.

The Total percentages of families under BPL Jamvada (45.6%), Daldi (97.2%), Gadha (91.47%), Varnosari (66.41%) and Korda (63.04%) which

is 69.13 percentage out of total HHs in the watershed. Hence a score of 10 is allotted. The percentage of schedule castes and schedule tribe is

negligible in the villages which is less than 20 percent(average.) of the total population; Hence a score of 3 was allotted in all the vilages. Rainfed

agriculture forms the primary occupation of the village due to the fact that ground water is saline and hence unfit for usage. More than 50 per cent

of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual wages earned by the labour is less than the minimum wages, hence a composite rank

of 3, 5 and 3 are allotted respectively.

Since the rainfall received is erratic and irregular, the moisture index is low and the area is classified under DDP block. Drinking water is

problematic in the village. Majority of land is degraded due to inherent salinity and ingress of salt from Rann. The soil is very permeable and

production of the land can be significantly enriched with the availability of timely irrigation. Cluster approach was followed taking into

consideration three micro-watersheds covering a total area of 5610 Ha. for Jamvada cluster is selected. Thus a cumulative score of 15,10 & 5 are

allotted respectively.

All the parameters taken together give a cumulative score of 104 to the watershed (reference Table 2.1 below).

Area proposed to be treated

Table no.2: Weight age of the project

Project

name

Name of

the Village

Project

type Weight age

i ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x xi xii xiii

IWMP-16

(jamvada)

Jamvada

DESERT 10 3 5 3 3 15 15 5 15 15 10 5 NA

Daldi

Gadha

Varnosari

Korda

(Source : PPR Table NO : 6)

Table No. 2.1 Criteria and weight age for selection of watershed

Sr. No. Criteria Maximum

score Ranges & scores

i Poverty index (% of poor to

population)

10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 %

(2.5)

ii % of SC/ ST population 3 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3)

iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are significantly lower

than minimum wages (5)

Actual wages are equal to or

higher than minimum wages

(0)

iv % of small and marginal

farmers

3 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3)

v Ground water status 3 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)

vi Moisture index/

DPAP/ DDP Block

15 -66.7 & below (15)

DDP Block

-33.3 to -66.6 (10)

DPAP Block

0 to -33.2 (0)

Non DPAP/ DDP Block

vii Area under rain-fed agriculture 15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70 %

(Reject)

viii Drinking water 5 No source (10) Problematic village (7.5) Partially covered (5) Fully covered

(0)

ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 % (10) Low- less than 10 % of TGA

(5)

x Productivity potential of the

land

15 Lands with low production & where

productivity can be significantly

enhanced with reasonable efforts

(15)

Lands with moderate

production & where

productivity can be enhanced

with reasonable efforts (10)

Lands with high production &

where productivity can be

marginally enhanced with

reasonable efforts (5)

xi Contiguity to another

watershed that has already

been developed/ treated

10 Contiguous to previously treated

watershed & contiguity within the

micro watersheds in the project (10)

Contiguity within the micro

watersheds in the project but

non contiguous to previously

treated watershed (5)

Neither contiguous to

previously treated watershed

nor contiguity within the

micro watersheds in the

project

xii Cluster approach in the plains

(more than one contiguous

micro-watersheds in the

project)

5 Above 6 micro-watersheds in cluster

(15)

4 to 6 micro watersheds in

cluster (10)


cluster (5)

xiii Cluster approach in the hills

(more than one contiguous

micro-watersheds in the

project)

NA Above 5 micro-watersheds in cluster

(15)


cluster (10)


cluster (5)

Total 104 150 90 41 2.5

Project type: Hilly/desert/Other

Table no.3: Watershed information

Name of the

project Name of the Village

No. Of

watersheds to be

treated

Watershed code Watershed

regime/type/order

IWMP-16

(Jamvada)

Jamvada 2 6A1B7b2#, 6A1B7b2#

Micro Watershed

Daldi 2 6A1B7b2#, 6A1B7b2#

Gadha 2 5H3C1c1#, 5H3C1c2#

Varnosari 2 6A1B7b2#, 6A1B7b2#

Korda 1 5H3C1c1#

Source: BISAG

These villages are being very back ward, so they have been on top priority of a number of developmental projects. These programmes are

Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS), Misson Mangalam are running in cluster villages.

i. MGNREGS: Deepening of three village pond, Road repairing and afforestation activity has been taken-up under MGNREGA.

ii. Mission Mangalam:- The objective is to organize the poor into Self Help Groups / Sakhi Mandals, link them with banks, build capacities

in them and lead them towards sustainable livelihoods. 187 beneficiaries are benefited by this scheme till now.

iii. Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC): 133 individual toilets are constructed under TSC programme.

iv. Awas Yojana: 182houses have been constructed in the Jamada project under Indira Awas Yojana and Sardar Awas Yojana

v. Wasmo project : Overhead tank, underground tank and pipelines are build under the Wasmo project.

Table no.4: Developmental programmers running in the project area

Sl.

no

Name of the

programme/scheme Sponsoring agency

Objectives of the

programme/scheme

Year of

commencement

Villages

covered

Estimated number

of beneficiaries

1 MGNREGA Rural Development Dep. Employment 2011-12

Jamvada

482

2 Misson Mangalam Rural Development Dep. Livelihood 2011-12 29

3 IAY Rural Development Dep. Housing 2011-12 14

4 SAY Rural Development Dep. Housing 2011-12 22

5 TSC Rural Development Dep. Sanitation 2011-12 15

6 GSWSB GSWSB Drinking Water 2011-12 204


Daldi

316







Gadha

325







Varnosari

175







Korda

630






Source: GP & Talati

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area

No

.

Project

name

Year

started

Name of

villages

No.

Of

micro

water

shed

Wate

rshed

codes

Area

under

treatm

ent

Fundi

ng

source

Nodal

agency PIA

Total

cost

(Lack

s)

Expen

diture

incurre

d up to

start of

IWMP

(in

lakh)

%

financ

ial

compl

etion

%

physical

completi

on

1 DDP-8 2011-12 Jamvada 1

500 Govt. DRDA GSRDC 30 30 100% 100%

2 DDP-5 2011-12 Daldi 2

1000 Govt. DRDA

M.R.Chaudh

ary,

Mehsana

60 60 100% 100%

4 DDP-4 2011-12 Varnosari 1

500 Govt. DRDA GSRDC 30 30 100% 100%

5 IWMP-6 2011-12 Korda 1

2000 Govt. DWDU DWDU

PAtan 300 300

Progre

ss Progress

Source: GP & Talati

CHAPTER – 2

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY

2.1. Project Implementing Agency

The Project Implementing Agencies (PIA) is selected by an appropriate mechanism by Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency

(GSWMA), the State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) in Gujarat. The PIAs are

responsible for implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations under State/

Central Governments, Government Institutes/ Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayats, Voluntary Organizations (VOs).The PIA for

Godhana watershed Project is District watershed development Unit (DWDU), Patan.

2.2 About District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Patan

2.2.1 The organization and its objectives

The District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Patan is a district level nodal agency and was established on 13 May 2008 to oversee

the smooth implementation of watershed projects in the district. The District Development Officer (DDO) is the chairman of the DWDU. The

DWDU has dedicated and experienced staff comprising one Project Director (Deputation from Gujarat Forest Department), a technical expert and a

multidisciplinary team of agriculture expert, community mobilization expert and Data Entry Operator, civil engineer, MIS coordinator, system

analyst, surveyor, and Accountant. The objectives of the DWDU, Patan are supervising, planning, implementing, documentation, promoting

watershed development projects and related developmental activities in the district as per guidelines. The DWDU, Patan also works as a PIA for

some IWMP projects.

2.2.2 Programmes/projects of DWDU, Patan

At present 21 IWMP projects have been sanctioned by Government of India for Patan district. The entry point activities of 18 IWMP

projects have been identified by the respective PIAs in the district. Patan Forest Division is PIA for 5 projects (IWMP-1, 2, 3, 4 & 7) and DWDU

itself is PIA for 17 projects (IWMP- 5, 6, 8 to 21). Apart from the 21 IWMP projects, DWDU Patan is involved in a total of 290 pre-Hariyali &

Hariyali projects (DDP & IWDP); in which 164 projects are completed and 126 projects are still running in the district. The DWDU, Patan is also

monitoring a central government sponsored scheme on “Artificial Recharge of Groundwater through Dugwells” in the district.

Table no. 6: PIA

No. Names of project Details of PIA

1 IWMP-8

(Godhana)

(i) Type of organization District Level Nodal Agency (Society)

(ii) Name of organization DWDU, Patan

(iii) Designation & Address Project Manager,DWDU, Patan

(iv) Telephone 02766 291800

(v) Fax 02766 232219

(vi) E-mail [email protected]

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level

No. Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned Monthly

remuneration

1 M K Patel 57 M Project Director BSC (Agri) 30 Years Project

Management 64145

2 Abhinandan Das 28 M T.E MBA in rural mang. 4 years Techanical Ex. 31250

3 Rahevar Pradeepsinh, 31 M MDT (Agriculture) BRS (Agri) 9 years Agriculture

Development 26250

4 Thakor Pravinsinh 38 M MDT (Agriculture) BRS (Agri) 11 years Agriculture

Development 15000

5 Patel Manisha 41 F MDT (CM) BRS (Agri) 9 years Community

Mobilization 20700

6 Modi Ravibhai 24 M Mis Co.ordinater M.sc. IT 1 year M.sc. IT 18000

7 Patel Vinodbhai 45 M MDT Engineer Civil Engineer 23 years Engineer 19838

8 Chaudhari Alpesh 29 M System Annalist PGDCA 7 years PGDCA 14400

9 Bhikhabhai Patel 62 M Account F.Y.BSC 34 Years Account 11040

10 Thakor Balvantji 35 M Account M.Com 5 Years Account 11875

11 Nisha Dodiya 27 F Exctive Ass. T.Y.B.Com 6 Years Exctive Ass. 6613

12 Nai Alkesh 37 M MDT (Data Entry

Operator) Basic Computer 6 years Data Entry 9919

13 Patel Riddhi 21 F MDT (Data Entry

Operator) Basic Computer 2 years Data Entry 9375

14 Takor Amrutji 42 M WDT(Agriculture) BRS(Agri) 12 years Agriculture

Development 10000

15 Bavlecha Dharmendra 27 M WDT(Engineer) D.C.E. 2 Year Engineer 12000

mailto:[email protected]

16 Patel Karishmaben 24 F WDT (CM) B.R.S,MSW 1 year Community

Mobilization 10000

17 Sidhu Vivek T. 27 M WDT(ACC) B.Com /PGDCA 7 year Accountant 7000

18 Parmar Mehulkumar 24 M WDT (Data Entry

Operator)

B.C.A., MS Office,

DTP 1 year Data Entry 6250

2.3 SWOT Analysis of the DWDU

Strength:

(1) Independent District Level Nodal Agency(DWDU). With Dedicated competent and experienced personnel.

(2) Separate State Level Nodal Agency (Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency) for Planning and fund Dispersion.

(3) Use multidisciplinary teams and with more holistic approaches using modern technology like GIS & Remote Sensing(RS).

(4) Good in-house training programmes have produced credible staff.

(5) Extensive grassroots coverage at district- and village-level with project office in cluster level and village office at village level.

(6) Amalgamation of Various technological, academic and Social institutions for programme support.

(7) Participatory planning involving more grassroots contact. Bottom-up approaches ensures effective grassroots and community participation.

(8) Allocation of financial resources to the community hence planning and Implementation by community with a Project Implementation

Agency for technical and Logistical support.

(9) Programme is more flexible and is adjusted to changing needs and environmental factors for making a sustainable and measurable

outcome

Weakness:

(1) Lack of technical knowledge in new Personnel.

(2) Bureaucracy and long channels of communication.

(3) High staff turnover since there is no permanent staff.

(4) Inadequate budgets as majority of area is rainfed and highly scarce natural resources.

(5) Numerous but uncoordinated developmental interventions resulting from secluded and untenable output.

(6) Duplication and repetition of projects without measuring output and gap analysis.

(7) Community participation suffers due to conflicts, counterproductive thinking and Lack of leadership for effective community mobilisation.

Opportunities:

(1) Cooperation between the public and private sectors.

(2) Improved collaboration and efficiency through departmental convergence.

(3) Greatly improved understanding of community needs through participatory planning and implementation would show greater accountability

and impact of work.

(4) Small independent decision-making units like village Watershed committee, SHG federation will facilitate quick decision-making and

greater flexibility in programme implementation.

Threats:

(1) Inadequate budgets are declining in real terms (inflation).

(2) Majority of project is near Rann Of Kachhaa which makes the project susceptible in natural bases resulting in limited impact.

(3) The outcome of the project is heavily dependent on monsoon making it vulnerable.

(4) Unfavourable socio-economic environment threatens operations and survival of the project.

CHAPTER – 3

BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA

3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology

3.1.1 Land use pattern

The net geographical area of Sinad watershed is about 8238.2 ha. out of which only 23.3 ha is forest area. About 6790 ha of land is under

agriculture and 9728.7 ha is rain-fed; mainly a Kharif crop is taken. About 1643 ha of the total land is classified under wasteland of which 99.1

percent is cultivable and rest is uncultivable (0.98%). The watershed consists of thorny species of Prosopis juliflora which was mainly broadcasted

to stop the spread of desert.

Table no. 8: Land use pattern

S. No. Names of

villages

Geographical

Area of the

village

Forest

Area

Land under

agricultural

use

Rainfed

area

Permanent

pastures

Wasteland

Cultivable Non-

cultivable

1 Jamvada 1457.3 292 854 854 - 2.2 308

2 Daldi 1118 160.2 762 719 - 3.6 272

3 Gadha 1699.4 0 1423.4 1263.5 - 1.7 355

4 Varnosari 1159 222.6 829 606.4 - 3.5 326

5 Korda 4295 1334.9 2589 2589 - 13 358

Total 9728.7 2009.7 6457.4 6031.9 0 24 1619

(Source : Census)

Forest Area13%

Land under agricultural

use40%

Rainfed area37%

Permanent pastures

0%

Wasteland10%

Land Cover

3.1.2 Soil and topography:

Jamvada Watershed Project falls under North West Gujarat Agro Climatic Zone. The soil is mainly sandy loam and saline. The soil is

brown to very dark grayish brown in surface colour. The depth of soil is moderate to deep about 25 to 75 cm. The predominant texture of soil is

loamy sand and silt and clay. The soil fertility is very poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The soil falls in Aridsol and Inseptisols

order. The topography of the area is flat.

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography

S. No.

Name of

the Agro-

climatic

zone

covers

project

area

Area in

ha

Names of

the villages

Major soil types

Topo-graphy a)Type b) Area in ha

1

North

Gujarat

Agro

climatic

zone

950 Jamvada Sandy laom to Sandy and Saline 950 Flat to moderate slope

2 603 Daldi Sandy laom to Sandy and Saline 603 Flat to moderate slope

3 1114 Gadha Sandy laom to Sandy and Saline 1114 Flat to moderate slope

4 653 Varnosari Sandy laom to Sandy and Saline 653 Flat to moderate slope

5 2290 Korda Sandy laom to Sandy and Saline 2290 Flat to moderate slope

5610 Total

5610

(Source : PPR )

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition

Sl no Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)

1 Jamvada

Nil Once in 5 Years

2 Daldi

3 Gadha

4 Varnosari

5 Korda

11. Edaphic Factors

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion

Cause Type of

erosion Area affected (ha)

Run off Average

soil loss

(mm/ year) (Tonnes/

ha/ year)

Water erosion -

Jamvada Daldi Gadha Varnosari Korda Total Jamvada Daldi Gadha Varnosari Total

a Sheet 767 535 963 515 1528 4308

b Rill 15 10 17 11 27 80

c Gully 9 6 11 5 19 50

d Ravenous

Sub-Total : 4438 Sub-Total :

Wind erosion 780 565 1000 575 1633 4553 - - - - - 35%

Total : 8991 Total : -

(Source : BISAG)

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)

Name of the

Village Survey Number

Soil

pH

Type of

Salinity

(Inherent/I

ngress)

Jamvada 242,239,237,236,232,221,205,204,203,194,22,21,20,36 8.0

Daldi 151,152,153,154,161,162,163,164,100,101,102,103,104,163,169,171,172,26,267,270,271,272,288 8.0

Gadha 8,10,13,14,230,221,229,228,220,219,325,214,146,145,144,143,140,142,139,132,134,87 8.2

Varnosari 25,33,28,29,110,109,100,101,96,99,98,77,76,73,72,71 8.0

Korda 305,824,301,245,833,50,51,57,58,832,831,845,60,61,781,782,768, 8.2

(Source : Talati Office)

Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions

Name of the

Village Survey Number Reasons

Jamvada Nil

Daldi Nil

Gadha Nil

Varnosari Nil

Korda Nil

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions

Name of project Average rainfall- last 5 years Average temperature

Year mm Summer Winter

IWMP-16

(Jamvada)

Max Min Max Min

2008 1020 44 24 34 17

2009 576 45 25 35 18

2010 311 46 27 34 15

2011 825 45 26 36 12

2012 280 43 27 35 11 (Source: DRDA)

The rainfall is scanty which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon of drought in every two to three years. The average rainfall of this area is

about 603 mm (from past five year data) with a highest intensity of 1020 mm. Last year 2012 is considered as a drought year because of 280mm of

rainfall. While uneven distribution is leading to runoff of soil every year to the streams, rivulets and depressed area of Rann , scantly rainfall led to

water scarcity in dry season.

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief

Project name Village Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams

IWMP-16 (JAMVADA)

Jamvada 24 mt 1 - 3 % YES

Daldi 25 mt 1 - 3 % YES

Gadha 30 mt 1 - 3 % YES

Varnosari 32 mt 1 - 3 % YES

Korda 32 mt 1 - 3 % YES

3.1.3 Land and Agriculture

Lack of surface water source and high salinity of ground water has limited the sufficient base for irrigation as well as for drinking purpose

in dry season. The average land holding is about 2 ha mostly rain-fed in nature. Lack of irrigation source forces the majority of the farmers to

migrate to ensure their livelihood. This affects directly the demographic profile of the village. The major crops cultivated by the farmers are Jowar

(Sorghum) and Cotton, castor, wheat and cumin. Sorghum is primarily grown for fodder purpose only. Cumin is the main cash crop in this region.

It is grown in alternate year with available irrigation facility. It is also grown without irrigation in some areas but the yield varies thereafter. Some

of the farmers take up rain-fed castor crop if rainfall is good. The land conservation measures such as earthen bunds and farm bunds in the area will

help them to take up a rabi crop of mustard or cumin in the residual moisture.

Juvar60%

Bajra30%

Castor10%

Cropping pattern in Kharif seasonWheat

2%

Cumin98%

Cropping pattern in Rabi Season

Table no. 14: Land ownership details

Sl no Village

Total owned land(Ha) HHs giving land

on lease

HHs taking land

on lease Gen OBC SC ST

1 Jamvada 66.49 800.40 0 0 20 20

2 Daldi 107.21 706.11 22.55 6.18 27 27

3 Gadha 161.39 562.45 3.69 0.00 19 19

4 Varnosari 58.97 449.04 21.38 13.30 22 22

5 Korda 955 1562 70 2 26 26

Total : 1349 4080 118 21 114 114

(Source : Pani Patrak & HH Survey)

Table no. 15: Agriculture

Sl no Village Net sown area

One time Two times Three times

1 Jamvada 854 162 NA

2 Daldi 762 286 NA

3 Gadha 1423 465 NA

4 Varnosari 829 94 NA

5 Korda 1500 200 NA

Total 5368.00 1207.00

(Source : House Hold Survey)

Table no. 16: Irrigation

Sl

no Village

Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well/Bore/Holia

Availability

months

Net

area(Ha)

Gross

area

Availability

months

Net

area(Ha)

Gross

area

Availability

months

Net

area(Ha)

Gross

area

1 Jamvada - - - 4 120 - 12 106 -

2 Daldi - - - 4 248 - - - -

3 Gadha - - - 4 200 - 12 193 -

4 Varnosari - - - 4 120 - 12 105 -

5 Korda - - - 4 160 - 12 298 -

Total 0 0 848 0 702 0

(Source : House Hold Survey & Bio Physical Survey)

Table no. 17: Crop details

Sl no Village

Kharif (Monsoon)

Crop 1 Juvar(fodder) Crop 2 BAJRA Crop 3 Castor

Area

(Ha.)

Production

(Kg.)

Productivity

(qt/ha)

Area

(Ha.)

Production

(Kg.)

Productivity

(qt/ha)

Area

(Ha.)

Production

(Kg.)

Productivity

(qt/ha)

1 Jamvada 450.0 3388500 75.3 256.2 235704 9.2 85.4 46970 5.5

2 Daldi 389.0 3306500 85.0 228.6 246888 10.8 76.2 38100 5.0

3 Gadha 734.0 4991200 68.0 426.9 290292 6.8 142.3 85380 6.0

4 Varnosari 376.0 3083200 82.0 248.7 310875 12.5 82.9 40621 4.9

5 Korda 1870.0 18400800 98.4 450.0 1278000 28.4 150.0 282000 18.8

Total : 3819.0 33170200.0 408.7 1610.4 2361759.0 67.7 536.8 493071.0 40.2

Sl no Village

Rabi (Winter)

Crop 1 Wheat Crop 2 Gram Crop 3 Cumin

Area

(Ha.)

Production

(Kg.)

Productivity

(qt/ha)

Area

(Ha.)

Production

(Kg.)

Productivity

(qt/ha)

Area

(Ha.)

Production

(Kg.)

Productivity

(qt/ha)

1 Jamvada 5.1 10353 20.3 0 0 0 158 44240 2.8

2 Daldi 8.2 16236 19.8 0 0 0 278 80620 2.9

3 Gadha 14.9 29800 20.0 0 0 0 450 112500 2.5

4 Varnosari 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 94 19740 2.1

5 Korda 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 200 44000 2.2

Total : 28 56389.0 60.1 0 0 0 1180 301100.0 12.5

Sl no Village

Zaid (Summer)

Crop

1 - -

Crop

2 - - Crop 3 - -

Area

(Ha.)

Production

(Kg.)

Productivity

(qt/ha)

Area

(Ha.)

Production

(Kg.)

Productivity

(qt/ha)

Area

(Ha.)

Production

(Kg.)

Productivity

(qt/ha)

1 Jamvada 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 Daldi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 Gadha 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 Varnosari 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 Korda 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


3.1.4 Livestock

The village has 991 cows, 1243 buffaloes, 270 Bullocks, 1047 Goats and 855 sheep. Cows and buffaloes are of local breed. The average

milk production of cattle is nearly 4- 6 litre per day. Goat milk is used for personal purpose and not sold in market. Majority of rabari community

depends on goat and sheep rearing for their livelihood. Lack of rain and surface water has reduced the fodder and pasture availability for their

animals. This leads to heavy migration to other parts of the state with their herds of goats and sheep. There is one dairy cooperative in the each

village. The dairy cooperatives are well linked with Dudh Sager or Banas Dairies and farmers get proper prices for the produces.

Table no. 18: Livestock

Sl no Village

Buffalo Cow Total Milk

(Buffalo+Cow) Goat

Sheep Bullock Hen Others

No milk/day

(ltr) No

milk/day

(ltr) Litre / Annual No

milk/day

(ltr)

1 Jamvada 108 540 54 162 130221 112 40 210 41 0 5

2 Daldi 162 810 317 951 326666 230 70 25 30 15 4

3 Gadha 213 1065 36 108 217592 136 54 90 8 0 15

4 Varnosari 260 1300 284 852 399196 69 25 180 88 0 7

5 Korda 500 2500 300 900 630700 500 140 350 103 25 10

Total : 1243 6215 991 2973 1704374 1047 329 855 270 40 41 (Source : House Hold Survey)

Table no. 19: Drinking water

Sl no Village Ground water table (mt) Source of drinking water Availability in months Quality

1 Jamvada 20 mt, 140 mt Netharland Connection 11 Portable

2 Daladi 25 mt, 160 mt Netharland Connection 11

3 Gadha 20 mt, 140 mt Netharland Connection 11

4 Varnosari 20 mt, 140 mt Netharland Connection 11

5 Korda 20 mt, 140 mt Netharland Connection 11

(Source : Bio-Physical Survey)

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources

Sl.

No.

Names of

project

Names of

Village CPR Particulars

Total Area (ha) Area available for treatment (ha)

Area owned/ In possession of

Pvt.

persons

Govt.

(specify

deptt.)

PRI

Any

other

(Pl.

Specify)

Pvt.

persons

Govt.

(specify

deptt.)

PRI

Any

other

(Pl.

Specify)

1 IWMP16 Jamvada Wasteland/ degraded land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(Jamvada) Pastures 0 110.2 0 0 0 110.2 0 0

Orchards 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Village Woodlot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Forest 0 292 0 0 0 292 0 0

Village Ponds/ Tanks 0 79.81 0 0 0 79.81 0 0

Community Buildings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Weekly Markets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Permanent markets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Temples/ Places of worship 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gramthan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 482.01 0 0 0 482.006 0 0

2 Daldi

Wasteland/ degraded land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pastures 0 64.06 0 0 0 64.06 0 0

Orchards 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Forest 0 160.2 0 0 0 160.2 0 0

Village Ponds/ Tanks 0 43.42 0 0 0 43.42 0 0





Gramthan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 267.68 0 0 0 267.68 0 0

3 Gadha Wasteland/ degraded land 0 76 0 0 0 76 0 0

Pastures 0 224 0 0 0 224 0 0

Orchards 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Forest 0 5.91 0 0 0 5.91 0 0

Village Ponds/ Tanks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0





Gramthan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 314.91 0 0 0 314.91 0 0

4 Varnosari

Wasteland/ degraded land 0 341.25 0 0 0 341.25 0 0

Pastures 0 5.13 0 0 0 5.13 0 0

Orchards 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Forest 0 222.6 0 0 0 222.6 0 0

Village Ponds/ Tanks 0 0 8.93 0 0 0 8.93 0

Community Buildings 0 0.18 0 0 0 0.18 0 0




Gramthan 0 0.9 0.9 0 0 0.9 0.9 0

Total 0 570.06 9.83 0 0 570.064 9.8294 0

5 Korda Wasteland/ degraded land 0 358 0 0 0 358 0 0

Pastures 0 18 0 0 0 18 0 0

Orchards 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Forest 0 1334.9 0 0 0 1334.9 0 0

Village Ponds/ Tanks 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 0





Gramthan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 1723.9 0 0 0 1723.9 0 0

(Source : Bio Physical Survey & Talati Office)

3.2. Socio-Economic Profile

3.2.1 Demographic Status

Jamvada watershed project has a total of 2154 households with a population of 10589 (as per base-line survey) out of which 5578 are male

and 5011 female .The sex ratio is 898 female to 1000 male. There are 672 BPL Households considering scores between (1-16) and 727 BPL

Households considering (16-20) scores. The average family size is 4.8. The literacy rate is very low i.e. 51.33 per cent; male literacy rate is 64.45

percent (of total male population) and female literacy rate is as low as36.81 percent (of total female population). The major castes in the village are

Thakor, Jadav, Goswami Bajaniya, Brahmin, Mali,Rabari and Schedule Caste . Majority of population is involved in agriculture and animal

husbandry.

Table no. 21: Demographic information

Sl no Village Population SC ST

Male Female Total Male Female Total % Male Female Total %

1 Jamvada 763 739 1502 8 8 16 1.07% 8 9 17 1.13%

2 Daldi 544 502 1046 24 32 56 5.35% 6 5 11 1.05%

3 Gadha 923 831 1754 22 21 43 2.45% 0 0 0 0.00%

4 Varnosari 685 602 1287 44 44 88 6.84% 1 1 2 0.16%

5 Korda 2663 2337 5000 45 35 80 1.60% 5 3 8 0.16%

TOTAL 5578 5011 10589 143 140 283 2.67% 20 18 38 0.36%


Table no. 22: Literacy rate

Sl no Village

Population Literacy Literacy %

above age 14

Literacy %

below age

14 Total Male % Female % Total %

1 Jamvada 1502 434 56.88% 255 34.51% 689 45.87% 34.22% 11.65%

2 Daldi 1046 325 59.74% 190 37.85% 515 49.24% 37.38% 11.85%

3 Gadha 1754 561 60.78% 260 31.29% 821 46.81% 38.65% 8.15%

4 Varnosari 1287 432 63.07% 317 52.66% 749 58.20% 47.55% 10.64%

5 Korda 5000 2178 81.79% 649 27.77% 2827 56.54% 42.80% 13.74%


3.2.2 Migration Pattern

People migrate during summer season to different parts of the state like Gandhidam, mehsana , Vijapur and Suarashtra as daily wagers,

agricultural labours and construction workers. Lack of fodder availability and grazing land for smaller ruminant force these people to migrate to

other places. Yearly migration is very less. Daily wage labour work mainly construction work is done by the villagers in the nearby town ,

Radhanpur. The community with livestock mainly sheep are migrating in nature. Nearly 4-5 months the community stays outside the village for

providing quality fodder to the livestock.

Table no. 23: Migration details

Sl no Village Total

population

Migration Migration by months

Main reason for

migration

Income

during

migration /

month Total Male Female

Up to 3

months

3-6

months

More

than 6

months

1 Jamvada 1502 196 99 97 64 82 50

Livelihood &

Fodder

4000

2 Daldi 1046 177 92 85 52 71 54 4000

3 Gadha 1754 253 140 113 112 97 44 4000

4 Varnosari 1287 162 91 71 48 69 45 4000

5 Korda 5000 909 630 279 824 55 30 4000

Total : 10589 1697 1052 645 1100 374 223


Table no. 24: Poverty

Sl no Village Total

Household

BPL % of BPL HH

Total Land

less HH

% of land less

HH 0-16 16-20 Total

1 Jamvada 285 35 95 130 45.61% 40 14.04%

2 Daldi 181 104 72 176 97.24% 67 37.02%

3 Gadha 387 232 122 354 91.47% 143 36.95%

4 Varnosari 262 114 60 174 66.41% 55 20.99%

5 Korda 1039 277 378 655 63.04% 148 14.24%

Total : 2154 762 727 1489 69.13% 453 21.03% (Source : House Hold Survey & Talati Office)

3.2.3 Infrastructure facilities:

Jamvada watershed is well connected with Santalpur Taluka with pucca roads and NH ways. The village has electricity connectivity under

Jyotigram Yojana of the State Government. Nearly all households in the village have electric connection. All the villages have primary schools.

Post office is only available in Korda. The nearest APMC is at Radhanpur which is nearly 35 km away. All the villages have milk collection centre.

No upper primary or higher secondary schools are there in the villages. All the students goes to Radhanpur ,which is the taluka town, for their

studies. The nearest market yard is also present in Radhanpur.

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure

Sl

no Village

Pucca

road

to the

village

(Y/N)

Schools Colleges

(Number)

Post

Office

(Distance)

Banks

(Number)

Distance

from

nearest

market

yard

Milk

collection

centre

(Number)

Milk

cooperative

(Number)

Other

cooperatives

/ CBIs

(Number)

Any other

institution LP UP HS

1 Jamvada Y Y N N N N N 35 Km. 2 1 1 Anganvadi

2 Daladi Y Y N N N N N 37 Km. 1 1 N Anganvadi

3 Gadha Y Y N N N y N 25 Km. 2 1 1 Anganvadi

4 Varnosari Y Y N N N N N 36 Km. 1 1 N Anganvadi

5 Korda Y Y Y Y N Y Y 31 KM 2 1 1 Anganvadi


Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets

Sl no Village HHs with

electricity

HHs with

safety

latrines

HHs with phones HHs with vehicle HHs

with

TV set

HHs

with

cooking

gas

HHs

with

Drinking

water

HHs

with

fridge Land

line Mobile

2-

wheeler

4-

wheeler

1 Jamvada 270 7 0 141 27 10 39 6 264 1

2 Daldi 171 10 0 173 13 13 26 5 180 5

3 Gadha 320 19 0 303 42 27 83 10 312 5

4 Varnosari 262 4 0 258 5 7 25 7 262 0

5 Korda 942 145 5 704 189 70 92 89 789 178

Total : 1965 185 5 1579 276 127 265 117 1807 189


3.2.4 Livelihood pattern

The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry, agriculture and during lean seasons they migrate for daily wage labourers in

other towns.. Another major occupation of the people is Charcoal making, using the wood of prosopis which they collect from the community land

or forest. Nearly 34% of people depends on agriculture while 68% of people depends on Animal Husbandry and agriculture. Casual labour is the

main source of livelihood for the marginal, small and landless farmers. Bharat Gunthan (Embroidery ) handicraft is one of the primitive work of

this region is now on the verge of extinction. There is an increase in tendency of skilled labour work due to high daily wage and availability of

construction work in the nearby town. Although trenching work of cannal irrigation is going on the villages for providing cannal irrigation,

presently there is very limited source of irrigation. So many labour works in the cannal irrigation work in the adjoining villages. The per capita

income of the villages depends on the livelihood opportunities in the villages. The average per capita income ranges from Rs. 19550 to Rs 35678.

Table no. 27: Per capita Income

Sl no Village Agriculture/ Forestry/

Animal

husbandry/

Casual

labour/ Services/ Handicraft/ Others/ Total/

annual annual annual annual annual annual annual annual

1 Jamvada 12683 0 3390 1294 1102 0 3490 21960

2 Daldi 15115 0 5723 1066 787 0 4163 26854

3 Gadha 9503 0 1976 3872 1059 0 3141 19550

4 Varnosari 8055 0 4590 9044 453 0 5298 27440

5 Korda 15637 0 2402 8757 0 0 2564 29360

Total : 60993 0 18080 24033 3401 0 18657 125164

Average per

capita 12199 0 3616 4807 680 0 3731 25033


3.2.5 Dependence on Common Property Resource

Around two decades ago, in a bid to check the advance of the encroaching desert, the government authorities arranged for a thorny desert

bush, commonly known in India as the Babul (Acacia nilotica ) and in rann as the Jangli or Ganda Baval (Prosopis juliflora) to be imported from

Israel and to be broadcasted in semi-desert parts of northern Kutch. This bush grows about ten feet and further spreads laterally like a wild fire. The

cutting of Ganda Baval was banned in this area three years ago. But now, almost every family in this area supplements its meagre income by

felling the tree and burning its wood in large pyramid-shaped piles to make charcoal, or kolsa as it is locally called. The charcoal is generally used

for fuel for daily meals. Very small or negligible number of people sells this charcoal for earning livelihood. Those who sells are reluctant to

disclose their identity as cutting Babul is banned.

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR

Sl no Village

Charcoal

Making Income

Benefit type

2 Income

Benefit type

2 Income Total income

% sells % sells % sells

1 Jamvada 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 Daldi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 Gadha 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 Varnosari 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 Korda 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)

Sl

no Village

Total

workforce Agriculture

Animal husbandry

(AH)

Agriculture +

AH Casual labour Services Handicraft Others

1 Jamvada 285 78 28 48 52 4 0 75

2 Daldi 181 59 16 22 32 2 0 50

3 Gadha 387 108 45 62 75 5 0 92

4 Varnosari 262 77 25 42 48 2 0 68

5 Korda 1039 382 160 278 158 16 5 40

Total : 2154 704 274 452 365 29 5 325


5.51

5.2

4.8

4.4

4.6

4.8

5

5.2

5.4

5.6

Gujarat India IWMP-16

(qt/

ha)

Castor Productivity(qt/ha)

3.2.6 Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country vs. World

“The term productivity in general means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land productivity means output per hectare of

land. Productivity can be calculated as dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total cultivated area under that crop.”

Data are made available by the Baseline survey , Handbook of Agriculture, ICAR publication 2006(For Gujarat and India), and Final

district plan (DAP) of Dept. of Agriculture (for Patan). The results indicate that the cluster villages have comparatively lower productivity

compared to Gujarat.. The productivity is low not only because that the land is unproductive or the farmer’s lack the skills to manage their crop but

also due lack to of source of irrigation, salty water and scarcity of rain.

The IWMP-14 villages comes under arid zone. So farmers grow crop according to the rainfall. If they get good rainfall they generally grow

high value crops like mustard, cumin, Bengal gram etc. In case of low rainfall they go for sorghum, and pearl millet. So we can say that monsoon

decides cropping patterns of the villages.

The IWMP-14 project has low productivity because of the following reasons

i) Full dependence on monsoon:

Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the absence of proper irrigation facility,100% of the total cultivated area depends on

the uncertain monsoon. Therefore, the suceess or failure of the monsoon determines the success or failure of agriculture

production.The rainfall is unreliable due to two factors: untimely and inadequate rainfall.

ii) Low use of fertilizer per unit cropped area:

Farmers do not use sufficient fertilizer due to lack of water, scarcity of fertilizer in market and insufficient money for fertilizer.

Many a times they don’t get fertilizer at the right time.

iii) Traditional farming methods:

This also leads to low productivity. There is a lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and technologies such as

multiple cropping. They don’t use FYM and other input in a proper way; that is why they don’t get 100% output. So these factors

contribute to low productivity.

iv) Lack of adequate farm machinery:

Even today a large number of farmers in some villages use wooden ploughs and bullocks. They don’t have adequate machinery like

seed drill. So, old machineries take more time in tillage practices.

v) Lack of finances for farmers:

Most of the farmers are marginal or small farmers in the villages. They do not have enough money to buy good quality seeds,

machinery and other inputs.

vi) Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers:

Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality leads to higher

land productivity. In Jamvada Project, there are mainly two limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most useful in

irrigated condition. But in Jamvada Project 100 per cent of land depend on rainfall. Second is mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizers

especially urea. This has resulted in disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land.

vii) Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing:

5-10% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper market for sale. So they sell it to

local traders at the low prices. Farmers mainly face two problems in which first is proper means of transportation and roads and second

problem is farmers don’t have proper storage facilities.

CHAPTER – 4

WATERSHED ACTIVITIES

Watershed Activities

Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain-fed regions of semi-arid tropics. These

regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and high incidence of

migration. Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The

common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.

4.1. Scientific Planning

i) Cluster Approach

This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The Jamvada Project

consists of three micro- watersheds namely 6A1B7b2#, 5H3C1c1#, 5H3C1c2# as their respective codes.

ii) Base line Survey

To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a

benchmark for any intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey was

undertaken which involved household census survey, Bio-physical survey and Village level data collection from Talati –cum mantri.

Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every household in the village. This

gave in the details of the demographic profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle

population, net consumption rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle and various schemes running and their benefits

Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, wells

in the area, crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field.

iii) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the

programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and indigenous Technological

Knowledge (ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, monitoring and

post- withdrawal activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social

mapping, and season calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in

specific. These tools put the villagers in ease than the complicated questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn Diagram were

used to identify various local vegetations (apt for a forestation) , Fodders crops , various institution and their significance in the life of the

farmers.

iv) Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning

Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development.

a) Prioritization

Geographical Information System(GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-

morphological, Soil, BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These were all given

proper weight age according to the Do LR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.

b) Planning

An action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope

percent, soil Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. Global positioning System (GPS)

was used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This was used to create a map. Contour Map

of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various locations for soil and water conservation structures.

c) Hydrological modelling

Hydrology modelling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, Flow accumulation. This model

overlaid over cadastral map to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to remove the human

error which generally occurs while calculating the catchment area of a check dam.

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects

S. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific criteria

was used

(A) Planning

Cluster approach Yes

Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the

Institute -

Baseline survey Yes

Hydro-geological survey Yes

Contour mapping Yes

Participatory Net Planning (PNP) Yes

Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover Yes

Ridge to Valley treatment Yes

Online IT connectivity between -

(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes

(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes

(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes

Availability of GIS layers -

1. Cadastral map Yes

2. Village boundaries Yes

3. Drainage Yes

4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes

5. Land use Yes

6. Ground water status Yes

7. Watershed boundaries Yes

8. Activity -

Crop simulation models# No

Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed

soil nutrient analysis No

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# No

Weather Station No

(B) Inputs

1. Bio-pesticides No

2. Organic manures No

3. Vermi compost No

4. Bio-fertilizer No

5. Water saving devices No

6. Mechanized tools/ implements No

7. Bio-fencing No

8. Nutrient budgeting No

9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No

Any other (please specify)

4.2. Institution building

i) Watershed Committee (WC)

It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the village. This

committee is registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the chairman of the watershed committee with

the secretary who will be a paid functionary. A watershed Committee was formed accordingly in all the village .The watershed has divided into 5

villages Jamvada (950 ha), Daldi (603 ha), Gadha (1114 ha), Varnosari (653 ha) and Korda (2290 ha) so separate watershed committees was

formed in the project. Capacity building training to the watershed committee is given by WDT. The watershed committee has a pivotal role to play

during and after the project implementation period.

Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area

Sr.

No

Village

Name

Name of the PRA

/Activity / FGD Date

Number

of

people

present

Lessons learnt / Understanding of the problem/situation

1 Jamvada

Gram Sabha, 24-Feb-2012 64 Provide Information

Committee Formation 24-Feb-2012 64 Different communities, Leadership of president. Interest of

villagers in the project.

PRA 22-May-2012 74 Migration ,lack of fodder, rainy farming ,less milk

production, poverty problem

2 Daldi

Gram Sabha, 15-02-12

31-05-12 74

Migration, lack of fodder, rainy farming, less education,

Cropping Pattern.

Committee Formation 31-May-2012 74 Provide Information

PRA 6-Jun-2012 51 Different communities, Leadership of president. Interest of


3 Gadha

Gram Sabha, 17-02-2012

04-06-2012 92

Migration, lack of fodder, rainy farming, less education,

Cropping Pattern.

Committee Formation 4-Jun-2012 92 Provide Information

PRA 5-Jun-2012 55 Different communities, Leadership of president. Interest of


4 Varnosari

Gram Sabha, 7-Feb-2012 60 Migration, lack of fodder, rainy farming, less education,

Cropping Pattern.

Committee Formation 7-Feb-2012 60 Provide Information

PRA 11-May-2012 85 Different communities, Leadership of president. Interest of


5 Korda

Gram Sabha, 30-Jul-2012 45 Migration, lack of fodder, rainy farming, less education,

Cropping Pattern.

Committee Formation 30-Jul-2012 65 Provide Information

PRA 3rd

Aug 76 Different communities, Leadership of president. Interest of


Problem Tree

Poverty

Unemployment

Not having effective skill

other than Frming and Animal husbandary

Law level of Illiterarcy

Not Having enough money for higher study

Migration for 8

months

One seasonal Farming

Not having fodder

favailability for animal (For 8

months)

Not having sufficient

infrastructure

Limited Market

Low Agricultural Production

Water Scarcity for agriculture

Unavailability of sufficient water

resource

Irratic and Irregular rainfall

Low fertile Soil

Poor Vegetative

Cover

saline water

ingress of sand

from Kutch

Poor Agricultural

Practice

Not Using advance tech. efficientlly and sufficient

fertilizer

abscence of effective effort for marketing

Absence of Credit availability

Not having any financial institution to land money

Low Income

Objective Tree

To improve Socio-economic status/

Migration

To improve new employment Opportunity

To linkage activity with existing

market

Handicraft, Fodder Bank.

To raise total family income with

existing activity

To improve soil fertility and water

availability

Waste weir, Seem Pond, Drainage Canal, farm pond, village

pond, Percolation tank, Afforestation.

To improve agriculture pactice

production imrovement training through KVK & Dry

farming research station, Crop demostration.

To Assure fodder availability, Improv

e animal health

Pasture land development, fodder Bank, Animal camp,.

Table no. 32: Watershed Committee details

Sl

.

N

o.

Names of

VWCs

Date

of

Regi.

as a

Socie

ty

(dd/

mm/

yyyy)

Name Designati

on

M

/

F

GE

N.

O

BC

S

C

S

T

S

F

M

F

L

F

La

nd-

less

U

G

SH

G

G

P

An

y

oth

er

Educati

onal

Qualific

ation

Functi

on/s

assign

ed#

1 Jamvada AYAR ANDABHAI

KARSHANBHAI

President M - 1 - - - - 1 - - - 1 - 5th

AYAR JIVANBHAI

BHURABHAI

Secretary M - 1 - - - 1 - - - - - - 7th

GOSWAMI

USHABEN

NIMGARBHAI

Member F - 1 - - - - - 1 - - - - 3th

NAYAK

LAXMANBHAI

DHUDABHAI

Member M - 1 - - - - 1 - - - - - 4th

RABARI RAJUBEN

SAGRAMBHAI

Member F - 1 - - - - - 1 - - - - -

THAKOR

RAMESHBHAI

DARGHABHAI

Member M - 1 - - - 1 - - - - - - TYBA

AYAR MADEVBHAI

KARSHANBHAI

Member M - 1 - - - - 1 - - - - 2th

AYAR RAMABHAI

GODADBHAI

Member M - 1 - - - - 1 - - - - - 4th

AYAR AJABHAI

PUNJABHAI

Member M - 1 - - 1 - - - - - 1 - 6th

AYAR

PARBATBHAI

AMRABHAI

Member M - 1 - - - 1 - - - - - - 9th

VAGHELA

PRAVINSINH

BADUBHA

Member M 1 - - - - - 1 - - - - - HSC

THAKOR KANJIJI

KALYANBHAI

Member M - 1 - - - - 1 - - - - - 2th

AYAR

RAYMALBHAI

RAVABHAI

Member M - 1 - - - - 1 - - - - - 7th

AYAR BABUBHAI

MANDANBHAI

Member M - 1 - - - - 1 - - - - - 5th

THAKOR AMRUTJI

JAYAJI

WDT

Member

M - 1 - - - - - - - - - - BRS

2 Daldi AYAR KHODABHAI

AJABHAI

President M - 1 - - 1 - -

MALEK MANUBHA

RAVAJI

Secretary M - 1 - - 1 - 10th

AYAR VALIBEN

BHIMABHAI

Member F - 1 - - - - -

RABARI

VIRAMBHAI

BHURABHAI

Member M - 1 - - - -

HARIJAN MANIBEN

VELABHAI

Member F - - 1 - - - -

RABARI NATHIBEN

JAMABHAI

Member F - 1 - - - - 7th

DESAI MAFABHAI

BHURABHAI

Member M - 1 - - - - -

MALEK

UMEDKHAN

BAVAJI

Member M - 1 - - 1 - 4th

AYAR

GOVINDBHAI

DAYABHAI

Member M - 1 - - - - 4th

THAKOR SARTANJI

GANESHJI

Member M - 1 - - - - -

BAJANIYA

LEELABHAI

UKABHAI

Member M - 1 - - - - 3th

PANCHAL

KANJIBHAI

JEHABHAI

Member M - 1 - - - - 5th

FAKIR GULABSHA

ISMAILSHA

Member M - 1 - - - - 5th

THAKOR AMRUTJI

JAYAJI

WDT

Member

M - 1 - - - - BRS

3 Gadha PARMAR

MENABEN

BAJUBHAI

President F - 1 - - 1 - - - 1 SCC

RABARI

PACHANBHAI

SADABHAI

Secretary M - 1 - - - - - - - - - 11th

THAKOR GAGUBEN

SAVABHAI

Member F - 1 - - - - - - -

VAGHELA

KUMBHAJI MAMUJI

Member M 1 - - - - - - - 9th

HARIJAN

NANJIBHAI

JIVABHAI

Member M - - 1 - - - - 5th

PANDYA

BHIKHIBEN

BABULAL

Member F 1 - - - - - - - -

RABARI

MANABHAI

GOKALBHAI

Member M - 1 - - - - - - -

RABARI SAVABHAI

RAMABHAI

Member M - 1 - - - - - - -

THAKOR AMRUTJI

JAYAJI

WDT

Member

M - 1 - - - - - - BRS

4 Varnosar

i

JADEJA KARSHANJI

GAMBHIRSINH

President M - 1 - - - HSC

THAKKAR

JYANTILAL PRAGJI

Secretary M - 1 - - - 5th

RABARI VALABHAI

SAGRAMBHAI

Member M - 1 - - - -

RABARI SATABHAI

VERSIBHAI

Member M - 1 - - - 2th

PARMAR SEMIBEN

SHANKARBHAI

Member F - - 1 - - -

THAKOR Member F - 1 - - - -

SHANKUBEN

RAVJIBHAI

THAKOR

SOMABHAI

CHATRAJI MUDAJI

Member M - 1 - - - 8th

LUHAR MEMABHAI

BHURABHAI

Member M - 1 - - - -

THAKOR TEJAJI

DEHAJI

Member M - 1 - - - -

THAKOR

MANABHAI

NARANBHAI

Member M - 1 - - 1 2th

THAKOR AMRUTJI

JAYAJI

WDT

Member

M - 1 - - - BRS

5 Korda Makvana Lebabhai

Dansangji

President M - 1 - - - - 1 - 4th

Makavana Pragabhai Secretary M - 1 - - 1 - - - - SSC

Joshi Premshankar

Natavarlal

Member M 1 - - - - - - - - PTC

Patel Nathubhai

Khemabhai

Member M - 1 - - - - - 1 - 2th

Harijan Somabhai

Devabhai

Member M - - 1 - - - - 1 - 7th

Kureshi Ramjanbhai

Abhaarambhai

Member M - 1 - - - - - - - PTC

Makvana Manguben

Paragbhai

Member F - 1 - - - - - 1 - -

Solanki Karshanbhai

Lavajibhai

Member M - 1 - - - - - 1 - -

Makvana Kankuben

Danabhai

Member M - 1 - - - - - 1 - -

Rabari Sagrambhai

Masharubhai

Member M - 1 - - - - - 1 - -

Parmar Manguben

Amratbhai

Member F - 1 - - - - - 1 - -

Thakor Amrutji Jayaji WDT

Member

M - 1 - - - - - - - BRS

Self Help Group

Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self help group

initiative especially for women help uplift their livelihood. Generally self help groups include landless and poor women.

Before formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focussed Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the women, which came up with

the following observations:

a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution.

b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders

c) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people

d) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking.

With a detailed discussion with some of the local NGOs working in the area like SEWA, Cohesion Foundation ,it was planned to have some

capacity building training regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities which will promote women

empowerment.

Table no. 33: SHG detail

S.

No

.

Name of

village

Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each

category

No. of BPL in each

category

With

only Men

With only

Women

With

both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1 Jamvada

0 3 0 3

(i)

Landless 0 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 0 23 23 0 0 0 0 3 3

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 3 0 3 0 0 40 40 0 0 0 0 3 3

2 Daldi

1 2 0 3

(i)

Landless 11 11 22 0 1 1 7 5 12

(ii) SF 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iii) MF 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 1 1

(iv) LF 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 2 2

Total 1 2 0 3 0 11 25 36 0 1 1 7 8 15

3 Gadha

0 0 3 3

(i)

Landless 14 11 25 0 0 0 10 10 20

(ii) SF 1 3 4 0 0 0 1 3 4

(iii) MF 4 2 6 0 0 0 4 2 6

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 0 3 3 0 19 16 35 0 0 0 15 15 30

4 Varnosa

ri

1 1 0 2

(i)

Landless 11 11 22 1 11 12 7 11 18

(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 1 1 0 2 0 11 11 22 1 11 12 7 11 18

5 Korda

0 3 0 3

(i)

Landless 0 32 32 0 1 1 0 20 20

(ii) SF 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 3 3

(iii) MF 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 3 0 3 0 0 37 37 0 1 1 0 23 23

(Source : Anganvadi Worker & SHG Grup Member )

User Group

User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on a long term basis. The user group collect user

charges from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits. It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and

have a feeling of ownership with community spirit.

Table no. 34: UG detail

S.

No.

Name of

village

Total no. of UGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each

category

No. of BPL in each

category

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1 Jamvada 4 0 2 6

(i)Landless 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 2

(ii) SF 16 16 0 0 0 3 0 3

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 41 2 43 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total : 59 2 61 0 0 0 5 0 5

2 Daldi 4 0 2 6

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 34 11 45 1 0 1 4 0 4

Total : 36 11 47 1 0 1 4 0 4

3 Gadha 4 0 2 6

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 12 3 15 0 0 0 2 0 2

(iii) MF 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 38 4 42 0 0 0 6 0 6

Total : 53 7 60 0 0 0 8 0 8

4 Varnosari 4 0 2 6

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iii) MF 8 0 8 0 0 0 1 0 1

(iv) LF 70 7 77 0 0 1 7 0 7

Total : 81 8 89 0 0 1 8 0 8

5 Korda 4 0 2 6

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 34 2 36 0 0 0 8 8

Total : 34 2 37 0 0 0 8 0 8

4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP-16 Jamvada

4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA)

EPA activities are taken up under watershed projects to build a rapport with the village community at the beginning of the project;

generally, certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local community are taken up. A group Discussion was conducted with

watershed Development Committee regarding the EPA activity, It was conveyed to the WC that an amount of Rs. 33.66 Lacks was allotted for

EPA activity, which was 4 per cent of total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important but after a brief

discussion it was conveyed to them that only those activities can be taken, which revive the common natural resources. It was also taken into

priority that there should be an instrument of convergence which will result in sustainability of activities.

Table no.35: Probable Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S.

No.

Names of

Villages

Amount

earmarked for

EPA (in lacks)

Entry Point Activities planned (in

lacks)

Estimated

cost (in

lacks)

Expected outcome

1 Jamvada 5.70

Pond Entrance-Khariyavat 2.15 Animal & Public working use

Repairing of Khariyavat 0.50 Animal & Public working use

Cattle trough 1.12 Drinking water facility for

animal

Chabutara 1.93 Feeding place for birds

Sub Total 5.70

2 Daldi 3.618


animal

Pipe Culvert 0.91 Transportation facility

Repairing of Chabutara 0.35 Feeding place for birds

Drinking Water facility (Parab) 1.098 Drinking water facility

Sub Total 3.618

3 Gadha 6.684

Drinking water facility- pipeline 2.03 Drinking water facility

Protection Wall in Anganvadi 0.85

Repairing of Cattle Trough 0.375 Drinking water facility for

animal

Water Tank(20,000 ltr) 1.279 Drinking water facility

Pond Entrance-Khariyavat 2.15 Animal & Public working use

Sub Total 6.684

4 Varnosari 3.918


animal

Repairing of Chabutara 0.20 Feeding place for birds

Drinking Water Tank(20,000 ltr) 2.178 Drinking water facility

Sub Total 3.918

5 Korda 13.74

Protection Wall OF Charm Kund 0.423

Pipeline for Cattle Trough-1 0.093 Drinking water facility for

animal

Pipeline for Cattle Trough-2 0.735 Drinking water facility for

animal

Renovation of open sump with Pipeline 1.82 Working use for public

Earthen bund 0.60 Reduce soil erosion & surface

water conservation

Border Plantation 0.88 Reduce soil erosion

Afforstation 2.27 Reduce soil erosion

entrance-Khariyavat at Village Pond 3.99 Animal & Public working use

Drinking water facility-Stand Post With

Pipeline 0.30 Drinking water facility

Renovation of Water Tank 0.47 Drinking water facility

Water Storage Tank in Gaushala 0.574 Drinking water facility

Renovation Of Pumping House 1.585 Drinking water facility

Sub Total 13.74

Total 33.66

4.3.2. Watershed Development Works:

Watershed development works are to be done during second phase of watershed project. A multi-tier ridge to valley sequence approach

should be approached towards implementation of watershed development projects. A net budget of 56 percent is allotted for this work. As the

average slope of the watershed is nearly 1-3 percentages, proper ridge to valley approach is not applicable for this watershed. The main constrains

in this watershed is soil erosion, salinity of soil, lack of water harvesting mechanism, drainage of low lying areas and lack of vegetation.

The main treatments in this pasture and non arable land are Earthen Bund with waste weir for discharge of excess water, percolation tank

and village ponds. This generally includes water conservation or surface water storage structures. In arable and personal land the main treatment is

planned for soil erosion. The main treatments are farm bunds, injection well, field outlet and border plantation. Being highly labour intensive, will

involve more of manual labour; so, funds from Mahatma National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) can be taken.

Following structures are been proposed in these areas

a. Field Bund with grass seeding

b. Percolation tank / villages pond

c. Earthen Bunds

d. Waste Weir

e. Border Plantation

f. Injection well

Table no.36: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works*

No

.

Village

name

Name of

structures

Type of treatment Type of land Target

(i)

Ridg

e

area

(R)

(ii)

Drai

nage

line

(D)

(iii)

Lan

d

dev.

(L)

(i)

Privat

e

(ii)

Communit

y

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify

)

No.

No. of

units

(Nos./

cu.m./

rmt/Ha)

Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)

Expected

month & year

of completion

(mm/yyyy)

M W O T

1 JAMVA

DA

Earthen Bund - - L - C - 2 No. - - - 7.184 2013-14

Waste weir - D - - C - 4 No. - - - 9.000 2014-15

Farm Bund - - L P - - 48152 Cum - - - 11.24 2013-14

Land leveling

P

340 ha

15.72 2014-16

Seem Pond - - L - C - 6 No. - - - 14.20 2014-15

Farm Pond - - L P - - 13 No. - - - 5.850 2013-14

Farm Outlet - - L P - - 32 No. - - - 9.600 2013-14

Horticulture plant

Plantation - - L - C - 2000 No. - - - 1.00 2013-14

Village Pond - - - - C - 2 No. - - - 6.000 2014-15

Sub Total 79.79

2 DALDI

Farm Bund - - L P - - 31583 Cum - - - 17.686 2013-14

Earthen Bund - - L - C - 1 No 3.00 2013-14

Waste weir - D - - C - 1 No 2.00 2013-14

Seem Pond - - L - C - 7 No - - - 18.132 2014-15

Farm Pond - - L P - - 11 No - - - 4.950 2014-15

Farm Outlet - - L P - - 13 No - 3.90 2014-15

Horticulture plant

Plantation - - L P - - 1968 No - - - 0.984

Sub Total 50.652

No

.

Village

name

Name of

structures


(i)

Ridg

e

area

(R)

(ii)

Drai

nage

line

(D)

(iii)

Lan

d

dev.

(L)

(i)

Privat

e

(ii)

Communit

y

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify

)

No.

No. of

units

(Nos./

cu.m./

rmt/Ha

)

Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)

Expected

month & year

of completion

(mm/yyyy)

M W O T

3 GADH

A

Farm Bund - - L P - - 69280 Cum - - - 38.797

Seem Pond - - L C - 11 No - - - 32.500

Waste weir - D - - C - 2 No 4.00 2013-14

Check dam D L - C 1 No 3.00 2013-14

Drainage Line

for pond inlet - - L P - - 100 Rmt - - - 1.50 2013-14

Farm Outlet - - L P - - 9 No - - - 2.70 2015-16

Injection well

(Holiya) - - L P - - 3 No - - - 0.650 2015-16

Horticulture plant

Plantation - - L P - - 2858 Nos. - - - 1.429 2015-16

Pond Inlet - - L P C - 1 Nos. - - 2.000

Village Pond - - - - C 2 No, - - - 7.000

Sub Total 93.576

4 VARN

OSARI

Check dam

Repairing - - L - C - 1 No - - - 1.00 2014-15

Waste weir - D - - C - 4 No - - - 7.00 2014-15

Farm Bund - - L P - - 32400 Cum - - - 18.144 2013-14

Seem Pond - - L - C - 5 No - - - 8.500 2013-14

Farm Pond - - L P - - 5 No - - - 2.250 2013-14

Farm Outlet - - L P - - 2 No - - - 0.60 2014-15

Border Fencing

(Wire) - - L P - - 4300 Rmt - - - 16.77 2014-15

Horticulture plant

Plantation - - L p C - 1176 No - - - 0.588

Sub Total 54.852

No

.

Village

name

Name of

structures


(i)

Ridg

e

area

(R)

(ii)

Drai

nage

line

(D)

(iii)

Lan

d

dev.

(L)

(i)

Privat

e

(ii)

Communit

y

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify

)

No.

No. of

units

(Nos./

cu.m./

rmt/Ha

)

Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)

Expected

month & year

of completion

(mm/yyyy)

M W O T

5 KORD

A

Earthen Bund - - L - C - 5 No 17.484 2014-15

Waste weir - D - - C - 8 No 18.75 2014-15

Farm Bund - - L P - - 76774 Cum 42.993 2013-14

Seem Pond - - L - C - 7 No 22.297 2015-16

Farm Pond - - L P - - 3 No 1.350 2015-16

Farm Outlet - - L P - - 8 No 2.400 2015-16

Earthen Bund

(Border of rann) - - L P - - 7 No 25.000 2015-16

Horticulture plant

Plantation - - L - C - 4766 No 2.383 2014-15

Injection well

(Holiya) p - 1 No 0.250 2013-14

Land Leveling - - L P - - 243 Ha. 36.452 2015-16

Village Pond - - - - C 7 No, - - - 20.000 2015-16

Village Pond

Inlet - - - - C - 1 No. - - - 3.000 2015-16

Sub Total 192.36

Grant Total 471.24

36.1 Technical Detail & Model Estimates of Work phase Watershed Work

Farm Pond:

There is very little qualitative difference between a pond/tank, which usually serves the population of a village, and farm pond,

which serves an individual agricultural field. Farm ponds greatly vary in size depending upon the rainfall. These have only a few metres of length

and width and are built across the flow path of natural drainage channels. Surplus water from one pond spills over to a lower pond. In some cases a

series of farm ponds are built on one single stream. Each pond caters to the irrigation needs of one farm and also augments ground water recharge.

Table No. 36.1.1 Technical Details of Farm Pond

NO Item Description NO L B H/D Total

QTY Unit

1

Item No.1: Quarrying transporting and depositing

selected materials from borrow area for raising of

embankment work in all zone of earthen dam for

specified thickness as directed for lead up to 1 km

and all lifts etc. complete. (SOR Irri. P.No. 2 Item

No.6)

1 20 15 1.50 480 Cmt.

No. Qty. Unit Item of Work Rate Per Amount

1 480.00 Cmt

Item No.1 : Quarrying transporting and depositing

selected materials from borrow area for raising of

embankment work in all zone of earthen dam for

specified thickness as directed for lead up to 1 km

and all lifts etc. complete. SOR Irri. P.No. 2 Item

No.6

47.80 Cmt 22944.00

Total 22944.00

Say Total 22944.00

SOR After two Years 15 % Extra Add 3441.60

26385.6

Say Total 26000

Table No 36.1.2 Recharging Bore well

NO DESCRIPTION No L B H Total QTY Unit

1 Item No.1 Driling the berl upto 10mm depth with 5" size (as per Local

rate by manually) 1.00 19.00 - - 19.00 Rmt

2 Item No.2 PVC Trade mark wi pipe … etc… comp. comp (5mm

thickness)&4"Dia PVC Pipe (as per local rate by manually) 1.00 20.00 - - 20.00 Rmt

3 Item No.3 Providing and Laying filter chamber With plaster.

(Attached Rate Analysis) 1.00 1.00 - - 1 No

4 Item No.4 Providing and Fixing Name Name plate Of Marble Size 0.45

* 0.30 with good writing etc. 1.00 1.00 - - 1 No

Rate Analysis Filter Chamber

NO DESCRIPTION No L B H Total

QTY Unit Rate Total

3 Item No.3 Providing and Laying filter chamber In Cement

Concrete/Brick Masonry Chamber & inner side plaster.

Excavation 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.10 4.40 CMT 75.00 330.00

B.B.C.C.1:5:10 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.10 0.40 CMT 1944.00 777.60

Brick Masanary1:6 2.00 2.00 0.23 1.20 1.104 CMT - -

2.00 1.20 0.23 1.20 0.66 CMT - -

1.59 CMT 3248.00 6346.59

Plaster 4.00 2.50 1.60 - 16.00 Smt 118.20 1891.20

Total 9345.39

Say Total 9345.00

NO QTY DESCRIPTION RATE PER AMOUNT

1 19.00 Item No.1 Driling the berl upto 10mm depth with 5" size (as

per Local rate by manually) 500.00 Rmt 9500.00

2 20.00

Item No.2 PVC Trade mark wi pipe … etc… comp. comp

(5mm thickness)&4"Dia PVC Pipe (as per local rate by

manually)

330.00 Rmt 6600.00

3 1.00 Item No.3 Providing and Laying filter chamber With

plaster. (Attached Rate Analysis) 9345.00 No 9345.00

4 1.00 Item No.4 Providing & fixing name plate of marbale size

0.45 × 0.30 with good writing etc… comp. (M.R.V.) 650.00 No 650.00

Total 26095.00

Say Total 26095.00

Extra Add 3914.25

SOR After two Years 15 %

Total 30009.25

Say Total 30000.000

Table No 36.1.3 Technical details of Earth Bund

NO Item Description NO L B H/D Total QTY Unit

1

Item No.2 : Quarrying transporting and depositing selected materials

from borrow area for raising of embankment work in all zone of

earthen dam for specified thickness as directed for lead upto 1 km

and all lifts etc. complete. SOR Irri. P.No. 2 Item No.6

1 100 1/2(2.35+9.75) 1.80 1089.00 Cmt.

2

Item No.3 Providing & Fixing Sign boards made out of Iron sheet

size 90*60 cms. Rectangle as per the design of IRC-67-1977 per

treated with one coat of red oxaid and two coats of best quality epoxy

paint: reflectorised with retro reflective sheeting as per IRC-30-

1968,2.1 m long stand post and frame fabricted from suitable size

iron angle of 50*50*5mm, &75*75*6 mm as required,painted with

best quality epoxy coatings in black and with bends. the details of

symbol of inscription / muberas for each board shall be in 1:2:4 CC

block of size 45*45*60 cms. for each leg. including excavation

curring etc. complete under the supervision of engineer in charge.

(M.R)

1 - - - 1 Nos.


1 1089.00 Cmt.

Item No.2 : Quarrying transporting and depositing selected materials from borrow

area for raising of embankment work in all zone of earthen dam for specified

thickness as directed for lead upto 1 km and all lifts etc.complete. (SOR Irri. P.No.

2 Item No.6)

47.80 Cmt 52054.20

2 1.00 No.

Item No.3 Providing & Fixing Sign boards made out of Iron sheet size 90*60 cms.

Rectangle as per the design of IRC-67-1977 per treated with one coat of red oxaid

and two coats of best quality epoxy paint: reflectorised with retro reflective

sheeting as per IRC-30-1968,2.1 m long stand post and frame fabricted from

suitable size iron angle of 50*50*5mm, &75*75*6 mm as required,painted with

best quality epoxy coatings in black and with bends. the details of symbol of

inscription / muberas for each board shall be in 1:2:4 CC block of size 45*45*60

cms. for each leg. including excavation curring etc. complete under the supervision

of engineer in charge. (M.R)

4500 No 4500.00

Total 56554.20

Say Total 56554.00


Total 56137.10

Table No 36.1.4 Technical details of Waste weir

Item Description No. Length Width Depth Qty Unit

1

Excavation for foundation in loose and soft soil ---------------

Body wall 1 2.00 10.00 1.20 24.00

Appron 1 10.00 2.50 0.60 15.00

Side wall 2 4.00 1.00 1.20 9.60

Extn. Wall 2 2.00 1.00 1.20 4.80

Total 53.40 Cmt

2

Providing and laying cement concrete 1:4:8 ------------------

Body Wall 1 10.00 1.50 0.20 3.00

Side wall 2 4.00 1.00 0.20 1.60

Extn. Wall 2 1.50 1.00 0.20 0.60

Total 5.20 Cmt

3

Providing and laying C.C. 1:3:6 stone agg. 20mm --------------

Body wall 1 10.00 0.85 2.00 17.00

Key 1 10.00 0.30 0.30 0.90

Appron 1 10.00 2.00 0.50 10.00

Body wall 2 1.50 0.60 3.10 5.58

2 1.90 0.60 2.30 5.24

2 0.43 2.90 0.60 1.50

Extn. Wall 2 1.00 0.60 3.30 3.96

Total 44.18 Cmt

4

Providing 15 mm thich cement plaster In single coat ----------

Top 1 10.00 0.60 0.00 6.00

Side wall 2 10.00 1.50 0.00 30.00

Key 3 10.00 0.30 0.00 9.00

2 2.00 3.50 1.60 22.40

2 2.00 1.715 0.60 4.12

2 4.00 0.60 0.00 4.80

2 2.60 2.10 0.00 10.92

2 1.00 0.60 0.00 1.20

Total 88.44 Cmt

5 Filling available excavated earth (excluding rock) --------- 1 28.00 2.00 1.00 56.00 Cmt

6 Providing and fixing Marble Plate 0.45 x 0.60----------- 1

1.00 No.

Qty Item Descriptions Rate Unit Amount

53.40 1

Excavation for foundation in loose and soft soil unto 1.5mt depth incl. sorting out and

stacking of useful materials and disposing of excavated stuff unto 50mt lead (SOR R

&B.,-P/17,I no 1 A)

75.00 Cmt 4005.00

5.20 2

Providing and laying cement concrete 1:4:8 (1 cement : 4 coarse sand : 8 hand broken

stone aggregates 40 mm nomial size) and curing complete excluding cost of from work in

(A) Foundation and plinth ( S.O.R R&B P- 19 it no 5.3.3)

2701.00 Cmt 14045.20

44.18 3

Providing and laying C.C. 1:3:6 stone agg. 20mm nominal size and finishing smooth with

curing etc complete excluding the cost of formwork and reinforcement for RCC work

(SOR R &B.,-P/19,I no 5.3.14 iv)

3586.00 Cmt 158429.48

88.44 4

Providing 15 mm thich cement plaster In single coat on fair side brick/concrete wall for

interior plastering upto floor two level finished even and smooth in: (i) cement mortar

1:3 (1 cement : 3 sand) S.O.R R&B P-65 It no -2 (1)

118.20 Smt 10453.61

56.00 5

Filling available excavated earth (excluding rock) In trenched plinth, sides of foundations

etc. in layers not exceeding 20 cm in depth consolidating each deposited layer by

ramming and watering) (S.O.R R&B P/17 it 4.12)

310.00 Cmt 17360.00

1.00 6 Providing and fixing Marble Plate 0.45 x 0.60 with good writing etc complete ( M.R) 1500.00 No 1500.00

Total

205793.29

Say Total 207793.00


Total 236662.00

Say Total 236000.00

Table No 36.1.4 Technical details of Field Outlet

Item Description No. Length Width Depth Qty Unit

1

Excavation for foundation in loose and soft soil ---------------

Side wall 4 0.80 0.50 0.50 0.80

Side wall 2 2.50 0.50 0.50 1.25

Body Wall 1 3.00 2.00 0.20 1.20

Appron 1 3.00 1.10 0.30 0.99

Total 4.24 Cmt

2

Providing and laying cement concrete 1:3:6 ------------------

Side wall 4 0.80 0.50 1.50 2.40

Side wall 2 2.50 0.50 1.50 3.75

Body Wall 1 3.00 0.80 1.00 2.40

Appron 1 3.00 1.15 0.30 1.04

Total 9.59 Cmt

3

Providing 15 mm thich cement plaster In single coat ----------

Side wall 1 4.00 1.30 1.00 5.20

Side wall 2 3.10 0.30 0.30 1.86

Top 2 4.10 0.50 0.00 4.10

Side wall 1 2.00 3.00 0.60 3.60

wall 1 2.00 2.50 1.00 5.00

body Top 1 3.00 0.50 0.00 1.50

Total 21.26 Smt

4 Providing and fixing Marble Plate 0.45 x 0.60----------- 1

1.00 No.

Qty Item Descriptions Rate Unit Amount

4.24 1

Excavation for foundation in loose and soft soil unto 1.5mt depth incl. sorting out and

stacking of useful materials and disposing of excavated stuff unto 50mt lead (SOR R

&B.,-P/17,I no 1 A)

75.00 Cmt 318.00

9.59 2

Providing and laying C.C. 1:3:6 stone agg. 20mm nominal size and finishing smooth

with curing etc complete excluding the cost of formwork and reinforcement for RCC

work (SOR R &B.,-P/19,I no 5.3.14 iv)

3586.00 Cmt 34389.74

21.26 3

Providing 15 mm thich cement plaster In single coat on fair side brick/concrete wall

for interior plastering upto floor two level finished even and smooth in: (i) cement

mortar 1:3 (1 cement : 3 sand) S.O.R R&B P-65 It no -2 (1)

118.20 Smt 2512.93

1.00 4 Providing and fixing Marble Plate 0.45 x 0.60 with good writing etc complete (

M.R) 1500.00 No 1500.00

Total 38720.67

Say Total 38720.00

SOR After Two Years 15 % Extra Add 5808.00

Total

44528.00

Say Total 45000.00

Table No 36.1.4 Technical details of Field Bund

NO Item Description NO L B H/D Total QTY Unit

1

Item No.1: Quarrying transporting and depositing selected materials from borrow area for raising of embankment work in all zone of earthen dam for specified thickness as directed for lead up to 1 km and all lifts etc. complete. SOR Irri. P.No. 2 Item No.6

1 100 0.3+1.8

2 0.75 78.75 Cmt.

2

Item No.2 : Vegetative Work Showing Of Seed On The Constructed RIdge Farm Bund Suppling Of Stylo /Dhaman Seed @ 4gm/mt(in Single line M.R.V

1 100.00 - - 100.00 Rmt


1 78.75 Cmt

Item No.1 : Quarrying transporting and depositing selected materials from borrow area for raising of embankment work in all zone of earthen dam for specified thickness as directed for lead upto 1 km and all lifts etc. complete. (SOR Irri. P.No. 2 Item No.6)

47.80 Cmt 3764.25

2 100.00 Rmt

Item No.2 : Vegetative Work Showing Of Seed On The Constructed RIdge Farm Bund Suppling Of Stylo /Dhaman Seed @ 4gm/mt(in Single line M.R.V

0.50 Rmt 50.00

Total 3814.25 Say Total 3815.00


Say Total 4387.25

Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S.

No

.

Village

Name

Type of

structures

Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of existing

structures Construction of new structures Total target

No

.

Area to

be

irrigate

d (ha)

Storage

capacity(cm

t)

Estimate

d cost

No

.

Area to

be

irrigate

d (ha)

Storag

e

capacit

y

Estimate

d cost

Area to

be

irrigate

d (ha)

Storag

e

capacit

y

Estimate

d cost

1 Jamvada

Seem Pond 0 0 0 0 5 55 16780 14.2 55 16780 14.2

Farm Pond 0 0 0 0 13 13 5711 5.85 13 5711 5.85

check dam

(Waste weir) 1 0 0 0 4 10 720 9 10 720 9

Farm Outlet 0 0 0 0 32 24 960 9.6 24 960 9.6

Earthen bund

(Sanked &

Bajaniya)

0 0 0 0 2 16 29855 7.18432 16 29855 7.18432

Village pond 0 0 0 0 2 22 10100 6 22 10100 6

Sub Total 1 0 0 0 58 140 64126 51.83432 140 64126 51.83432

2 Daldi

Seem Pond 0 0 0 0 7 77 19570 18.132 77 19570 18.13152

Farm Pond 0 0 0 0 11 11 330 4.95 11 330 4.95

check dam

(Waste weir) 0 0 0 0 1 2.5 180 2.00 2.5 180 2

Farm Outlet 0 0 0 0 13 9.75 390 3.9 9.75 390 3.9

Earthen bund

(Tetariya) 0 0 0 0 1 8 5020 3 8 5020 3

Sub Total 0 0 0 0 33 108.25 25490 31.98152 108.25 25490 31.98152

3 Gadha

Seem Pond 0 0 0 0 11 121 59033 32.5002 121 59033 32.5002

Farm Pond 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

check dam

(Waste weir) 0 0 0 0 3 7.5 540 7 7.5 540 7

Farm Outlet 0 0 0 0 1 0.75 30 2.7 0.75 30 2.7

Sub Total 0 0 0 0 15 129.25 59603 42.2002 129.25 59603 42.2002

4 Varnosari

Seem Pond 0 0 0 0 5 55 15780 8.5 55 15780 8.5

Farm Pond 0 0 0 0 5 5 2196 2.25 5 2196 2.25

check dam

(Waste weir) 1 0 2092 1 4 10 720 8 10 2812 9

Farm Outlet 0 0 0 0 2 1.5 60 0.6 1.5 60 0.6

Sub Total 1 0 2092 1 16 71.5 18756 19.35 71.5 20848 20.35

5 Korda

Seem Pond 0 0 0 0 7 77 48325 22.29731 77 48325 22.29731

Farm Pond 0 0 0 0 3 3 1506 1.35 3 1506 1.35

check dam

(Waste weir) 1 0 4184 2 8 20 1440 18.75 20 5624 20.75

Farm Outlet 0 0 0 0 8 6 240 2.4 6 240 2.4

Earthen

bund(Vadiya

sar &

0 0 0 0 5 40 15439 17.484 40 15439 17.484

Thakor)

Village pond 0 0 0 0 1 11 5100 3 11 5100 3

Sub Total 1 0 4184 2 31 146 66950 62.28131 146 71134 64.28131

Total 3 0 6276 3 15

3 595 234925 207.6474 595 241201 210.6474

Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lack Rs.)

S.

No

.

Village

Name

Type of

structures

Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of existing

structures Construction of new structures Total target

No

.

Area to

be

irrigate

d (ha)

Storag

e

capacit

y

Estimate

d cost

No

.

Area to

be

irrigate

d (ha)

Storag

e

capacit

y

Estimate

d cost

Area to

be

irrigate

d (ha)

Storag

e

capacit

y

Estimate

d cost

1 JAMVADA

(i)Open wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii)Bore wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Injection well

(holiya) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(Pl. specify) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sub Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 DALDI

(i)Open wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii)Bore wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Injection well

(holiya) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(Pl. specify) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sub Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 GADHA

(i)Open wells 2 6 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 6 0 0.5

(ii)Bore wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Injection well

(holiya) 1 1 0 0.25 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.25

(Pl. specify) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sub Total 3 7 0 0.75 0 0 0 0 7 0 0.75

4 VARNOSA

RI

(i)Open wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii)Bore wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Injection well

(holiya) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(Pl. specify) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sub Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 KORDA

(i)Open wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii)Bore wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Injection well

(holiya) 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.3 0 0 0.3

(Pl. specify) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sub Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.3 0 0 0.3

Total 3 7 0 0.75 1 0 0 0.3 7 0 1.05

Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises

S.

No.

Name of

village Name of activity

Type of land Executing agency Target Expected

month &

year of

completio

n

(mm/yyy

y)

(i) Private

(ii)

Communit

y

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(i) UG

Estimated cost

(Lacks)

(ii)SHG

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

1 JAMVADA

Production system

Crop Demonstration p 1 Individual 0.450 2014-15

Micro Irrigation System p 30 Individual 9.000 2015-16

Animal Camp C 4 Others 1.200 2015-16

Animal Shed P 12 Individual 3.600 2014-15

Sub Total 14.250

2. Livelihood

Cattle Feed Unit C 1 SHG 2.000 2014-15

Agro Service Center C 1 SHG 2.000 2014-15

Agri Machinery spare parts

repairing and selling unit C 1 SHG 2.000 2015-16

Low cost drip irrigation P 4 Individual 1.200 2015-16

Reaper C 1 UG 0.925 2015-16

Oil Engine C 12 Individual 3.600 2016-17

Tailoring Work P 4 Individual 0.600 2015-16

Revolving fund (Seed Money) P 2 Individual 0.500 2013-14

Sub Total 12.825

Total 27.075

2 Daldi

Production


Land Treatment (Gypsum) p 137 Individual 1.095 2014-15



Animal Shed p 10 Individual 3.000 2014-15

Sub Total 9.045

2. Livelihood



Thresher C 1 SHG 1.750 2015-16

Reaper C 1 SHG 0.900 2016-17


Sub Total 8.1405

Total 17.186

3 Gadha

Production


Land Treatment (Gypsum) P 183 Individual 1.460 2014-15



Animal Shed P 5 Individual 5.400 2015-16

Sub Total 16.710

2. Livelihood


Rotavator C 1 SHG 1.239 2015-16


Oil Engine C 12 Individual 5.400 2015-16

Cumin Processing C 1 SHG 2.000 2015-16

Reaper C 1 Ug 0.900 2016-17



Sub Total 15.039

Total 31.749

4 Varnosari

Production


Micro Irrigation System P 10 Individual 3.000 2015-16

Land Treatment (Gypsum) P 137 Individual 1.095 2015-16



Sub Total 9.795

Livelihood




Oil Engine P 5 Individual 2.250 2016-17

Reaper C 1 SHG 0.900 2015-16


Sub Total 8.816

Total 18.611

5 Korda

Production

Crop Demonstration 1 0.750 2014-15

Land Treatment (Gypsum) p 1200 Individual 9.600 2014-15



Sub Total 34.350

2. Livelihood

Cattle Feed Unit P C 1 SHG 2.000 2015-16

Agro Service Center P C 1 VWC 4.000 2015-16

Agri Machinery spare parts

repairing and selling unit P C 1 SHG 2.015 2015-16

Oil Engine P C 30 Individual 13.500 2015-16

Cumin Processing P 1 SHG 2.000 2015-16

Rotavator P C 4 UG 5.000 2015-16

Reaper P C 1 UG 0.900 2016-17

Poultry Unit p 5 Individual 1.500 2016-17

Sub Total 30.915

Total 65.265

Grund Total 159.885

Cattle Feed Centre

Cattle feed centre is unit for procurement and selling of cattle feed to the village farmers. The centre will be managed by the SHGs and

regular guidance will be provided by the DWDU unit. The procurement of the feed will be done by the SHG from different cattle feed producing

units and dairy cooperatives. After procurement the feed will be sold to the registered cattle owner. Before procurement of the lot the cattle owners

have to registrar themselves to avail the service. This centre will provide cotton cake, Isabgul, mineral mixture, Sagardan, soya cake etc all inputs

for quality enhancement of milk.

Benefit:

Ensure timely supply of cattle feed

Increase the milk production and fat quantity

Will provide balance diet to the cattle

Table 39.1. Primary Model for A Cattle feed centre

The estimate is considering one month cattle feed for 100 cattle and 10 kg intake

Sl No Particulars Quantity Rate Amount

1 Cotton cake (50kg) 90 840 75600

2 Isabgul (60kg) 25 700 17500

3 Mineral Mix (60kg bag) 25 800 20000

4 Sagardana (70kg) 50 650 32500

5 Room rent 1 1000 1000

6 weighing 1 2000 2000

7 weighing stand 1 2500 2500

8 Stationary 1 500 500

9 Labour 3 3000 9000

10 Furniture 20000

11 Miscellaneous 20000

12 Total 200600

Particulars

day cattle feed

quantity

Total

quantity

one day

bag Rate Amount

Cost

per

cattle

per

monoth

Cotton Cattle 15 100 3 4500 90 840 75600 756

isabgul

15 100 1 1500 25 700 17500 175

MM

15 100 1 1500 25 800 20000 200

Sagardan

15 100 2 3000 50 650 32500 325

Profit distribution and re-investment

Sl No Iteam

Cost per

cattle per

monoth

Project

cost

(30%)

Farmers

cost

(70%) Bag

Project

cost

Farmers

cost

Total

Profit

Profit

Reinvested

Profit

retained

by farmer

Repay of

loan(IWMP)

1

Cotton Cake(50 kg

each) 1512 454 1058 90 40824 40824 5400 4050 270 1080

2

Isabgul cake(60 kg

each) 350 140 210 25 29400 3500 1250 937.5 62.5 250

3

Mineral mix(60 kg

each) 400 160 240 25 38400 4000 1250 937.5 62.5 250

4 Sagardana (70kg) 650 260 390 50 101400 13000 1750 1312.5 87.5 350

210024 61324 9650 7238 483 1930

Table 39.2. Primary Model for Dairy Collection Centre

Dairy Collection Centre

Sl NO Heads Rate

1 Fat testing machine 45000

2 Weighing machine 7500

3 Furniture 25000

4 Computer 20000

5 Electric fitting, Light and Fan 8000

6 Milk container 25000

8 Deposit (registration fee ) to Banas Dairy Palanpur 5000

7 Salary for staff (2 staff,@2000 per month) 2000

9 Capital 34500

10 Total 172000

Total Fixed cost 170000

Sl NO Particulars (Variable cost) Rate

1 Maintenance cost (Rs) - per month 5000

2 Electric bill (Rs)- Per month 1000

3 Daily milk collection (lit) - average 250

4 Rate (As per fat content @ 4.2 for 1 fat) ,considering 7 fat average , (Rs) per litre 29.4

5 Cost of procuring milk (per day) 7350

6 Total milk procurement cost (Rs)- per month 220500

7 TOTAL variable cost (Rs)- per month 228500

Sl NO Particulars (Income) Rate

1 Selling price of milk ( 8% + 0.03%;milk sp gr 1.030) 32

2 Sample milk (0.03% of total milk) 8

3 Gross revenue - per day (Rs) 8178

4 Gross revenue (Rs)- per month 245352

Revenue model

Sl NO

Particulars Year 0 1 2 3 4

1 Capital cost 170,000

2 Recurring cost with depreciation of 5% of fixed assets 2,742,000 2,879,025 2,879,025 2,879,025 2,879,025

3 Total Expenditure 2,912,000 2,879,025 2,879,025 2,879,025 2,879,025

4 PV @ 8% discounting rate 2,912,000 2,665,764 2,468,300 2,285,463 2,116,169

5 Revenue 2,944,228 3,003,113 3,063,175 3,124,438 3,186,927

6 PV @ 8% discounting rate 2,944,228 2,780,660 2,626,179 2,480,280 2,342,487

7 Net Income 32228 114896 157879 194817 226317

BC Ratio 4.22

Table 39.3. Primary Model for Cumin Processing Unit

1 Fixed cost Amount (Rs)

2 Cumin processing 200000

4 Total Fixed cost 200000

1 Variable cost

2 Electric rate per unit 9

3 Working Hour - per day (Unit per day) 18

4 Cost incur per day 162

5 Labour cost 200

6 Total variable cost per day 362

7 Months of working per year 2

8 Total variable cost yearly 21720

1 Income

2 Rent per hour 900

3 Working Hour - per day 18

4 Gross income - per day 16200

5 Gross income - per year 972000

Revenue model

Sl NO Particulars Year 0 1 2 3 4 Total 5 years

1 Capital cost 200,000

2 Recurring cost with depreciation

of 5% of fixed assets 21,720 241,720 241,720 241,720 241,720

3 Total Expenditure 221,720 241,720 241,720 241,720 241,720

4 PV @ 8% discounting rate 221,720 223,815 207,236 191,885 177,671 800,607

5 Revenue 972,000 991,440 1,011,269 1,031,494 1,052,124

6 PV @ 8% discounting rate 972,000 918,000 867,000 818,833 773,343

7 Net Income 750280 694185 659764 626948 595671 2,576,569

Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas

S. No. Names of

Villages

Major activities of the SHGs No. of SHGs

involved

Average annual

income from activity

per SHG Name of activity

1 Jamvada

Cattle Feed Unit 1 30000

Agro Service Center 1 45000

Agri Machinery spare parts repairing and selling unit 1 20000

2 Daldi Cattle Feed Unit 1 28000

3 Gadha



Rotavetar 1 12700

4 Varnosari



5 Korda


Cumin Processing 1 75000

Agri Machinery spare parts repairing and selling unit 1 21000

Total 13 429700

Table no. 41: Linkages developed at village level

Sr.

No. Village Name of activity Forward/Backward linkage Linkage with Outcome

1 Jamvada

Cattle Feed Unit Farmer cooperatives Cattle feed companies Quality feed at lower

price

Agro Service Center Agro produce market, Village

for agri inputs

Village level individual

farmers, agri input companies

Quality input at lower

price

Agri Machinery spare

parts repairing and

selling unit

Agriculture Part produce market,

Village for agri inputs


farmers, agri Part input

companies


price

2 Daldi Cattle Feed Unit Farmer cooperatives Cattle feed companies Quality feed at lower

price

3 Gadha


price


for agri inputs




price

Rotavator Agriculture Machinery work

Lend development inputs


farmers, agri Work Production up

4 Varnosari


price


for agri inputs




price

5 Korda


price

Agri Machinery spare

parts repairing and

selling unit

Agriculture Part produce market,

Village for agri inputs


farmers, agri Part input

companies


price

Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works

S.

No

.

Name of

village

Name of

structure/

work

Type of treatment Type of land Executin

g agency Target

(i)

Ridg

e

area

(R)

(ii)

Drainag

e line

(D)

(iii)

Lan

d

dev.

(L)

(i)

Privat

e

(ii)

Communit

y

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify

)

(i) UG

Area

(ha)

No. of

plants

Estimated

cost (Rs.

in lakh)

Expecte

d month

& year

of

completi

on (mm/

yyyy)

(ii)SHG

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

1

IWMP-16

JAMVAD

A

Horticulture 0 0 L P C 0 Ug 2554 12768 6.384

Regeneratio

n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Agro-

forestry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Fuel wood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Fodder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

A

forestation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pasture dev. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nursery

raising 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Others (pl.

specify) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas

S. No. Name(s) of the

villages CPR particulars Activity proposed

Target

Target area

under the

activity (ha)

Estimated

expenditure

(Rs.)

Expected no.

of

beneficiaries

1 Jamvada Total Village Cover Seem Pond 41.21 12.2 64

2 Daldi Total Village Cover Seem Pond 24.1 17.931 50

3 Gadha Total Village Cover Seem Pond 151.41 31.5 64

4 Varnosari Total Village Cover Seem Pond 264.31 8.673 45

5 Korda Total Village Cover Seem Pond 21.4 18.992 113

Total 502.43 89.296 336

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution

Sr.

No.

Name of the

Training

Institute

Full Address with

contact no.,

website & e-mail

Type of

Institute# Area(s) of specialization

Accreditation

details

Trainings

Reference

Year

No. of

trainings

assigned

No. of

trainees

to be

trained

1 Krishi Vigyan

kendra Samoda, Patan

Research

Institute

Agriculture/Horticulture/Animal

Husbandry GoI

2012-

2014 27 459

2

Dantiwada

Agri

University

Banaskantha University Agriculture/Horticulture/Animal

Husbandry GoI

2012-

2014 8 136

3 VRTI/seva Kutch/Radhanpur NGO Capacity Building Society Reg.

Act

2012-

2014 10 170

4 BISAG Gandhinagar Space

application Remote GoG

2012-

2014 10 170

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan

S. No. District Project Stakeholders Total no. of

persons

No. of

persons to

be trained

No. of training

programmes

Estimated cost

(in lacks)

1 JAMVADA

PIA 4 4 3 0.25

WDTs 5 5 4 1.67

UGs 70 70 7 1.5

SHGs 40 40 4 1.00

WCs 13 13 4 1.15

GPs 4 4 2 0.055

Community 100 100 10 1.50

Others (Pl. specify) 0 0 0 0

Sub total

236 236 34 7.125

2 DALDI

PIA 4 4 2 0.15

WDTs 6 6 2 0.84

UGs 60 60 6 0.99

SHGs 36 36 4 0.9

WCs 12 12 5 0.8

GPs 2 2 1 0.05

Community 82 82 6 0.7925


Sub total

202 202 26 4.5225

3 GADHA

PIA 4 4 4 0.25

WDTs 6 6 5 1.25

UGs 70 70 5 1.722

SHGs 35 35 6 1.75

WCs 8 8 5 1.14

GPs 4 4 2 0.85

Community 98 98 8 1.393


Sub total

225 225 35 8.355

4 VARNOSARI

PIA 5 5 3 0.75

WDTs 6 6 2 0.57

UGs 42 42 3 0.8875

SHGs 22 22 3 0.87

WCs 9 9 4 0.97

GPs 4 4 2 0.98

Community 65 65 4 0.87


Sub total

153 153 21 5.8975

4 KORDA

PIA 5 5 5 0.29

WDTs 6 6 5 1.875

UGs 120 120 10 3.14

SHGs 36 36 4 2.85

WCs 15 15 9 3.27

GPs 4 4 3 1.18

Community 140 140 10 4.57


Sub total

326 326 46 17.175

Total

1142 1142 162 43.075

Table no.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities

S. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure

(Rs.)

Outcome (may quantify,

wherever possible)

1 Wall Slogan DWDU, Patan 25000

Awareness & Motivation

for the importance of

watershed project

2 Street plays Local Drama Groups 24000

3 Video shows DWDU, Patan 24000

4 Pamphlets and posters DWDU, Patan 6000

5 Banners, Hoardings DWDU, Patan 6000

Total :

85000

CHAPTER 5

BUDGET

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project

Sl no Budget component Cost requirement

1 Administrative costs 84.15

2 Monitoring 8.415

3 Evaluation 8.415

4 Entry Point activity 33.66

5 Institution and Capacity Building 42.075

6 Detailed Project Report 8.415

7 Watershed Development Works 471.24

8 Livelihood activities for asset less 75.735

9 Production systems and micro-enterprises 84.15

10 Consolidation phase 25.245

TOTAL : 841.50

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP (Rs. In Lakh)

Sr. No. Particular JAMVADA DALDI GADHA VARNOSARI KORADA TOTAL

1 Budget Component

Administrative Costs 14.250 9.045 16.71 9.795 34.35 84.15

Monitoring 1.425 0.9045 1.671 0.9795 3.435 8.415

Evaluation 1.425 0.9045 1.671 0.9795 3.435 8.415

2 Preparatory phase, including

Entry point activities 5.7 3.618 6.684 3.918 13.74 33.66

Institution and capacity building 7.125 4.5225 8.355 4.8975 17.175 42.075

Detailed Project Report (DPR) 1.425 0.9045 1.671 0.9795 3.435 8.415

3 Watershed Works Phase

Watershed development works 79.8 50.652 93.576 54.852 192.36 471.24

Livelihood activities for the asset less persons 12.825 8.1405 15.039 8.8155 30.915 75.735

Production system and micro enterprises 14.25 9.05 16.71 9.795 34.35 84.15

4 Consolidation phase 4.275 2.7135 5.013 2.9385 10.305 25.245

Total : 142.50 90.45 167.10 97.95 343.50 841.50

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement

Sl No Village Total cost requirement Total funds available under

IWMP Gap in funds requirement

1 JAMVADA 173 142.5 30.50

2 DALDI 108.85 90.45 18.40

3 GADHA 204.8 167.1 37.70

4 VARNOSARI 109.75 97.95 11.80

5 KORDA 400.5 343.5 57.00

Total

996.9 841.5 155.4

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes

No. Village Phase/ Type of

work*

Activity to be

carried out

Fund made

available to IWMP

due to convergence

(in lakh)

Scheme with

which

convergence

took place

Reference no. of

activity/ task/

structure in DPR

Level at which

decision for

convergence was

taken

1 Jamvada

Land base Pond deepening 9.00 MGNREGA

District level

Total 9.00

Production Drip Irrigation 21.00 GGRC, NHM

District level

Production Animal Camp 0.50 Agriculture

District level

Total 21.50

Sub Total 30.50

2 Daldi


District level

Total 9.00


District level


District level

Total 9.40

Sub Total 18.40

3 Gadha


District level

Total 19.00


District level


District level

Total 18.70

Sub Total 37.70

4 Varnosari


District level

Total 4.50


District level


District level

Total 7.30

Sub Total 11.80

5 Korda


District level

Total 22.00


District level

Total 35.00

Sub Total 57.00

Grand Total 155.40

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects

S.

No.

Name of

Private Sector

Partner

Agency

Type of agreement signed Financial contribution

Partnership

Interventions

Expected

Outcomes Comments

a) M o U b)Contract c) Any other

(pl. specify) IWMP

Private

sector

- - - - - - - -

CHAPTER 6

OUTCOME

Table no.52: Environmental Benefits

Sr.

No. Village

Soil loss

(tonne/ha.)

Water storage

(‘000 lit) Ground water table (mt) Tree cover

Pre-

project

Expected

post-

project

Pre-

project

Expected

post-

project

Open

well:

pre-

project

Open

well:

post-

project

Bore

well:

pre-

project

Bore

well:

post-

project

Area

in Ha.:

pre-

project

Area

in Ha.:

post-

project

Tree

count:

pre-

project

Tree

count:

post-

project

1 JAMVADA 0 0 19238 64126 0 0 305 293 0 0 800 2000

2 DALDI 0 0 7647 25490 0 0 289 277 0 0 787 1968

3 GADHA 0 0 17881 59603 0 0 327 314 0 0 1143 2858

4 VARNOSARI 0 0 6254 20848 0 0 310 298 0 0 571 1439

5 KORDA 0 0 21340 71134 0 0 269 258 0 0 1911 4766

Average : 0 0 14472 48240.2 0 0 300 288 0 0 1042 2606

Table no. 53: Status of Drinking water

S.

No.

Names of

Villages

Availability of drinking water Quality of drinking water

Comments (no. of months in a year)

Pre-project Expected Post

project Pre-project

Expected Post-

project

1 JAMVADA

12 12 Potable Potable -

2 DALDI

3 GADHA

4 VARNOSARI

5 KORDA

Table no. 54:Crop area and yield in the project area

Sr.

No.

Name of

village Name of crops

Pre-project Expected Post-project

Area Production in

Kg

Average

Yield (Qtl)

per ha.

Area Production in

Kg

Average

Yield (Qtl)

per ha. (ha) (ha)

1 Jamvada

Kharif

Juvar 450.0 3388500 75.3 472.5 3735821 79.1

Bajra 256.2 235704 9.2 269.0 259864 9.7

Castor 85.4 46970 5.5 89.7 51784 5.8

Rabi

Wheat 5.1 10353 20.30 6.4 13588 21.3

Gram 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0

Cumin 158 44240 2.80 221.2 65033 2.9

2 Daldi

Kharif

Juvar 389.0 3306500 85 408.5 3645416 89.3

Bajra 228.6 246888 10.8 240.0 272194 11.3

Castor 76.2 38100 5 80.0 42005 5.3

Rabi

Wheat 8.2 16236 19.8 10.3 21310 20.8

Gram 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0

Cumin 278 80620 2.9 389.2 118511 3.0

3 Gadha

Kharif

Juvar 734.0 4991200 68.0 770.7 5502798 71.4

Bajra 426.9 290292 6.8 448.2 320047 7.1

Castor 142.3 85380 6.0 149.4 94131 6.3

Rabi

Wheat 14.90 29800 20.00 18.6 39113 21.0

Gram 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0

Cumin 450 112500 2.50 630.0 165375 2.6

4 Varnosari

Kharif

Juvar 376.0 3083200 82.0 394.8 3399228 86.1

Bajra 248.7 310875 12.5 261.1 342740 13.1

Castor 82.9 40621 4.9 87.0 44785 5.1

Rabi

Wheat 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Gram 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Cumin 94.00 28365.00 2.51 131.6 34683 2.6

5 Korda

Kharif

Juvar 1870 18400800 98 1963.5 20286882 103.3

Bajra 450 1278000 28 472.5 1408995 29.8

Castor 150 282000 19 157.5 310905 19.7

Rabi

Wheat 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0

Gram 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0

Cumin 200 44000 2 280.0 64680 2.3

Table no. 55: Area under horticulture / other crops

S. No. Name of Village Crop Existing area under the

crop Area post project (ha)

1 JAMVADA Border Plantation - 19.5

2 DALDI Border Plantation - 10.9

3 GADHA Border Plantation - 19.4

4 VARNOSARI Border Plantation - 8.2

5 KORDA Border Plantation - 25.7

Table no. 56: Details of livestock in the project areas

(For fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)

S. No. Name of

Village Type of Animal

Pre-Project Expected Post-project

Remarks No.

Yield

(lit per

day)

Income

(Rs per

annum)

No. Yield Income

1 JAMVADA

Milch-animals 274 742 8013600 288 779 8414280 Taking present year

as base year

Draught Purpose animals 41 0 0 0 0

Animals for other purpose 215 0 0 0 0

2 DALDI


as base year



3 GADHA


as base year



4 VARNOSARI


as base year



5 KORDA


as base year



Table no. 57: Employment to be supplemented in the Project area

NO. Names of

Villages

Wage employment Self employment

No. of man days No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total

1 JAMVADA 0 0 18842 16889 35731 0 0 299 268 567 0 0 299 2 145

2 DALDI 2211 0 9947 10522 22680 50 0 225 238 513 50 0 0 66 263

3 GADHA 1791 0 20651 19458 41900 30 0 346 326 702 30 0 0 13 307

4 VARNOSARI 3751 0 6448 14361 24561 64 0 110 245 419 64 0 0 122 245

5 KORDA 9165 695 38266 38006 86131 211 16 881 875 1983 211 16 0 8 446

Table no. 58: Seasonal migration from Project area

No. Names of villages No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project

1 JAMVADA 196 98 100 60

2 DALDI 177 89 100 60

3 GADHA 253 127 100 60

4 VARNOSARI 162 81 100 60

5 KORDA 909 455 100 60

Table no.59: Per capita Income

Sr. No. Village Source of Income Pre-project Expected post project

1 Jamvada

Agriculture 12683 16488

Forestry 0 0

Animal Husbandry 3390 4407

Casual Labour 1294 1682

Services 1102 1433

Handicraft 0 0

Others 3490 4537

Total : 21960 28548

2 Daldi


Forestry 0 0



Services 787 1023

Handicraft 0 0

Others 4163 5412

Total : 26854 34910

3 Gadha


Forestry 0 0



Services 1059 1376

Handicraft 0 0

Others 3141 4083

Total : 19550 25415

4 Varnosari


Forestry 0 0



Services 453 589

Handicraft 0 0

Others 5298 6888

Total : 27440 35672

5 Korda


Forestry 0 0



Services 0 0

Handicraft 0 0

Others 2564 3334

Total : 29360 38168

Total : 125164 162713

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages

No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project

(no.)

During the

project (no.)

Post-project

(no.)

1 Iwmp -16

Backward linkages 0 0 0

Seed certification 0 0 0

Seed supply system 0 5 5

Fertilizer supply system 0 5 5

Pesticide supply system 0 5 5

Credit institutions 0 0 0

Water supply 0 0 0

Extension services 0 5 5

Nurseries 0 0 0

Tools/machinery suppliers 0 2 2

Price Support system 0 0 0

Labour 0 0 0

Any other (please specify) 0 0 0

Forward linkages 0 5 5

Harvesting/threshing machinery 0 5 5

Storage (including cold storage) 0 0 0

Road network 0 0 0

Transport facilities 0 0 0

Markets / Mandis 0 0 0

Agro and other Industries 0 5 5

Milk and other collection centers 0 0 0

Any other (please specify)

CHAPTER -7

QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation

A Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases. The

system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the entire state of

Gujarat and all of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular project. Details related to soil

type, Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number wise details related to ownership,

irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from the

DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form of a database which will help the stakeholders know areas of importance viz.,

already treated areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show

the satellite imageries of various years from the project inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the

effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan corrective measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners

and evaluators for judging the efficacy of the project.

Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & evaluation System, which will help the ground

staff alias WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher-up official

in charge of the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works in the

following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information of various treatment areas during the DPR.

The probable sites are then transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is reported to the server

by means of an SMS by the WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view the progress in a project by means of summarized

reports generated over frequent periods of time.

7.2 Plans For Project management

The Project management of any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organisation and the

village level institutes. In Jamvada project, watershed committee and various user group have been formulated for post project operation and

maintenance of assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project even after

implementation stage. A proper link-up will be built during project period with various institutes and capacity building organisation. They will act

as a major kingpin during post implementation for scaling up the successful experience during project.

7.3 Watershed Development Fund

The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is watershed Development Fund. The contribution of it will

comes mainly fund the following:

7.4 User Charges

Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed during

the formation of user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules.

The secretary of watershed committee (WC) shall maintain the records of the following.

CHAPTER -8

MAPS

Documents

Table of Contents - gswma.gujarat.gov.ingswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2011-2012/Patan/Pat_IWMP_16.pdf · Table of Contents CHAPTER -1..... 6