3
GAP ACCEPTANCE STUDY KUNWAR TANVEER BHUSHAN Roll No: 141713 Gap (Sec.) Gap Accept ed Vehicl es Gap Reject ed vehicl es Cumulati ve accepted Cumulati ve Rejected % cumulative accepted gaps % cumulativ e rejected gaps 0 0 18 0 341 0.000 100.000 1 0 22 0 323 0.000 94.721 2 0 20 0 301 0.000 88.270 3 2 26 2 281 0.851 82.405 4 6 30 8 255 3.404 74.780 5 7 27 15 225 6.383 65.982 6 10 25 25 198 10.638 58.065 7 5 14 30 173 12.766 50.733 8 19 10 49 159 20.851 46.628 9 16 12 65 149 27.660 43.695 10 15 15 80 137 34.043 40.176 11 15 10 95 122 40.426 35.777 12 5 9 100 112 42.553 32.845 13 16 11 116 103 49.362 30.205 14 20 8 136 92 57.872 26.979 15 22 6 158 84 67.234 24.633 16 21 9 179 78 76.170 22.874 17 8 7 187 69 79.574 20.235 18 10 8 197 62 83.830 18.182 19 2 5 199 54 84.681 15.836 20 0 3 199 49 84.681 14.370 21 1 4 200 46 85.106 13.490 22 1 6 201 42 85.532 12.317 23 4 4 205 36 87.234 10.557 24 4 2 209 32 88.936 9.384 25 1 4 210 30 89.362 8.798 26 3 3 213 26 90.638 7.625 27 0 1 213 23 90.638 6.745 28 2 1 215 22 91.489 6.452 29 2 4 217 21 92.340 6.158 30 3 0 220 17 93.617 4.985 31 4 2 224 17 95.319 4.985 32 4 3 228 15 97.021 4.399 33 2 3 230 12 97.872 3.519 34 2 1 232 9 98.723 2.639 35 0 4 232 8 98.723 2.346 36 0 0 232 4 98.723 1.173 TRANSPORTATION DIVISION TRAFFIC MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY NIT WARANGAL

Table

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

lab record for mtech

Citation preview

Page 1: Table

GAP ACCEPTANCE STUDY KUNWAR TANVEER BHUSHAN

Roll No: 141713

Gap (Sec.)

Gap Accepted Vehicles

Gap Rejected vehicles

Cumulative accepted

Cumulative Rejected

% cumulative accepted gaps

% cumulative rejected gaps

0 0 18 0 341 0.000 100.0001 0 22 0 323 0.000 94.7212 0 20 0 301 0.000 88.2703 2 26 2 281 0.851 82.4054 6 30 8 255 3.404 74.7805 7 27 15 225 6.383 65.9826 10 25 25 198 10.638 58.0657 5 14 30 173 12.766 50.7338 19 10 49 159 20.851 46.6289 16 12 65 149 27.660 43.695

10 15 15 80 137 34.043 40.17611 15 10 95 122 40.426 35.77712 5 9 100 112 42.553 32.84513 16 11 116 103 49.362 30.20514 20 8 136 92 57.872 26.97915 22 6 158 84 67.234 24.63316 21 9 179 78 76.170 22.87417 8 7 187 69 79.574 20.23518 10 8 197 62 83.830 18.18219 2 5 199 54 84.681 15.83620 0 3 199 49 84.681 14.37021 1 4 200 46 85.106 13.49022 1 6 201 42 85.532 12.31723 4 4 205 36 87.234 10.55724 4 2 209 32 88.936 9.38425 1 4 210 30 89.362 8.79826 3 3 213 26 90.638 7.62527 0 1 213 23 90.638 6.74528 2 1 215 22 91.489 6.45229 2 4 217 21 92.340 6.15830 3 0 220 17 93.617 4.98531 4 2 224 17 95.319 4.98532 4 3 228 15 97.021 4.39933 2 3 230 12 97.872 3.51934 2 1 232 9 98.723 2.63935 0 4 232 8 98.723 2.34636 0 0 232 4 98.723 1.17337 2 2 234 4 99.574 1.17338 1 0 235 2 100.000 0.587

Table 1 : GAP ACCEPTANCE AND GAP REJECTION TABLE

TRANSPORTATION DIVISION TRAFFIC MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY NIT WARANGAL

Page 2: Table

GAP ACCEPTANCE STUDY KUNWAR TANVEER BHUSHAN

Roll No: 141713

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 360.000

20.000

40.000

60.000

80.000

100.000

120.000

Critical Gap

% cumulative rejected gaps% cumulative accepted gaps

Gap (Seconds)

% C

umul

ative

Gap

s

Fig 1 : Graph between %cum gaps and Gaps (sec)

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 360.000

20.000

40.000

60.000

80.000

100.000

120.000

% cumulative Accepted Vs Gap(sec.)

% cumulative accepted gaps

Gap (Seconds)

% C

umul

ative

Acc

epte

d G

ap

Fig 2 : graph between %Cum Accepted Gaps to Gaps (sec)

TRANSPORTATION DIVISION TRAFFIC MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY NIT WARANGAL