23
Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of the fishing beneficial use throughout the State with respect to bioaccumulation of toxic pollutants D.1.1 What are the extent and location of water bodies with sufficient evidence to indicate that the fishing beneficial use is at risk due to pollutant bioaccumulation? D.1.2 What are the extent and location of water bodies with some evidence indicating the fishing beneficial use is at risk due to pollutant bioaccumulation? D.1.3 What are the extent and location of water bodies with no evidence indicating the fishing beneficial use is at risk due to pollutant bioaccumulation? D.1.4 What are the proportions of water bodies in the State and each region falling within the three categories defined in questions D.1.1, D.1.2, and D.1.3? D.2. Assess trends in the impact of bioaccumulation on the fishing beneficial use throughout the State D.2.1 Are water bodies improving or deteriorating with respect to the impact of bioaccumulation on the fishing beneficial use? D.2.1.1 Have water bodies fully supporting the fishing beneficial use become impaired? D.2.1.2 Has full support of the fishing beneficial use been restored for previously impaired water bodies? D.2.2 What are the trends in proportions of water bodies falling within the three categories defined in questions D.1.1, D.1.2, and D.1.3 regionally and statewide? D.3. Evaluate sources and pathways of bioaccumulative pollutants impacting the fishing beneficial use D.3.1 What are the magnitude and relative importance of pollutants that bioaccumulate and indirect causes of bioaccumulation throughout each Region and the state as a whole? D.3.2 How is the relative importance of different sources and pathways of bioaccumulative pollutants that impact the fishing beneficial use changing over time on a regional and statewide basis? D.4. Provide the monitoring information needed to evaluate the effectiveness of management actions in reducing the impact of bioaccumulation on the fishing beneficial use D.4.1 What are the management actions that are being employed to reduce the impact of bioaccumulation on the fishing beneficial use regionally and statewide? D.4.2 How has the impact of bioaccumulation on the fishing beneficial use been affected by management actions regionally and statewide?

Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework ......Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework ......Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of

Table1. Bioaccumulationmonitoringassessmentframeworkforthefishingbeneficialuse.D.1. Determine the status of the fishing beneficial use throughout the State with respect to bioaccumulation of toxic pollutants D.1.1Whataretheextentandlocationofwaterbodieswithsufficientevidencetoindicatethatthefishingbeneficialuseisatriskdueto

pollutantbioaccumulation?D.1.2Whataretheextentandlocationofwaterbodieswithsomeevidenceindicatingthefishingbeneficialuseisatriskduetopollutant

bioaccumulation?D.1.3Whataretheextentandlocationofwaterbodieswithnoevidenceindicatingthefishingbeneficialuseisatriskduetopollutant

bioaccumulation?D.1.4WhataretheproportionsofwaterbodiesintheStateandeachregionfallingwithinthethreecategoriesdefinedinquestionsD.1.1,

D.1.2,andD.1.3?D.2. Assess trends in the impact of bioaccumulation on the fishing beneficial use throughout the State D.2.1Arewaterbodiesimprovingordeterioratingwithrespecttotheimpactofbioaccumulationonthefishingbeneficialuse?

D.2.1.1Havewaterbodiesfullysupportingthefishingbeneficialusebecomeimpaired?D.2.1.2Hasfullsupportofthefishingbeneficialusebeenrestoredforpreviouslyimpairedwaterbodies?

D.2.2WhatarethetrendsinproportionsofwaterbodiesfallingwithinthethreecategoriesdefinedinquestionsD.1.1,D.1.2,andD.1.3regionallyandstatewide?

D.3. Evaluate sources and pathways of bioaccumulative pollutants impacting the fishing beneficial use D.3.1Whatarethemagnitudeandrelativeimportanceofpollutantsthatbioaccumulateandindirectcausesofbioaccumulation

throughouteachRegionandthestateasawhole?D.3.2Howistherelativeimportanceofdifferentsourcesandpathwaysofbioaccumulativepollutantsthatimpactthefishingbeneficial

usechangingovertimeonaregionalandstatewidebasis?D.4. Provide the monitoring information needed to evaluate the effectiveness of management actions in reducing the impact of

bioaccumulation on the fishing beneficial use D.4.1Whatarethemanagementactionsthatarebeingemployedtoreducetheimpactofbioaccumulationonthefishingbeneficialuse

regionallyandstatewide?D.4.2Howhastheimpactofbioaccumulationonthefishingbeneficialusebeenaffectedbymanagementactionsregionallyandstatewide?

Page 2: Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework ......Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of

Table2.

Page 3: Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework ......Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of

Table3. Criteriaforassigningcandidatelakestotiers.ColorsrefertoshadinginTable4.

Tier1(blue)BothindicatortypessampledHg:Below303(d)listingcriterion(90%ofsamplesbelow0.2ppm)Organics:Below303(d)listingcriteria(90%ofsamplesbelowFCGs)AtleastsomefishingactivityTier2(green)BothindicatortypessampledHg:Below303(d)listingcriterion(90%ofsamplesbelow0.2ppm)Organics:meansbelow2servingATLsAtleastsomefishingactivityTier3(purple)BothindicatortypessampledHg:meanbelow0.2Organics:meansbelow2servingATLsAtleastsomefishingactivityTier4(yellow)BothindicatortypesnotsampledHg:Below303(d)listingcriterion(90%ofsamplesbelow0.2ppm)Organics:Below303(d)listingcriteria(90%ofsamplesbelowFCGs)Themorefishingthebetter

Page 4: Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework ......Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of

Table4. CandidatesforinclusionintheCleanLakesStudy.CandidatesfortheCleanLakesStudy:Region1.SeeTable3fortierandcolorscheme.LettersindicatepriorityoftheTier4lakes.Region Lake Species Tier Comments1 Kangaroo

LakeRBT Remotebackcountrylake.

1 ReservoirF LMB Remotebackcountrylake.1 Lewiston

LakeRBT 4a Popular.Moreheavilyfished

thanCleone.1 TrinityLake RBT ListedforHg.DonoteatLMB

advisory.1 Howard

LakeRBT Remotebackcountrylake.

1 PlaskettLake

Hardhead Remotebackcountrylake.

1 CleoneLake RBT 4b Popular. CandidatesfortheCleanLakesStudy:Region2.SeeTable3fortierandcolorscheme.LettersindicatepriorityoftheTier4lakes.Region Lake Species Tier Comments2 Horseshoe

Lake,QuarryLakes

CCAT NotimpairedforHg.OneofthreePCBsamplesaboveFCG.Difficulttogetbass.

2 LagoLosOsos

CCAT Nofishingallowed.

2 LakeCunningham

CARP Notpopular.PCBs,DDTs,dieldrin,chlordanesaboveFCGs.

2 LakeElizabeth

CARP NotimpairedforHg.PCBs,DDTs,dieldrinaboveFCGs

2 BrionesReservoir

LMB Fishingnotallowed.

2 LakeMadigan

Bluegill Onlygotbluegill.

Page 5: Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework ......Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of

Table4. CandidatesforinclusionintheCleanLakesStudy(continued).CandidatesfortheCleanLakesStudy:Region3.SeeTable3fortierandcolorscheme.LettersindicatepriorityoftheTier4lakes.Region Lake Species Tier Comments3 Loch

LomondReservoir

LMB,Bluegill

Impaired.Hg0.11at350mm.

3 LopezLake LMB,Sucker

2 Notimpaired.PCBs,dieldrinaboveFCGs

Page 6: Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework ......Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of

Table4. CandidatesforinclusionintheCleanLakesStudy(continued).CandidatesfortheCleanLakesStudy:Region4.SeeTable3fortierandcolorscheme.LettersindicatepriorityoftheTier4lakes.Region Lake Species Tier Comments4 Castaic

LagoonLMB,CARP,RBT,Redear

3 NeedrepeatoflowHg,PCBsaboveFCG.New303(d)Listing

4 ElizabethLake

Crappie,Bullhead,RBT

Hg0.21in2007,underin2010‐repeat?(Tier4basedon2010)

4 LakeLindero Carp Notimpaired.Hglowin2007and2010.OrganicsaboveFCGs.

4 MalibouLake

LMB,Carp,Bluegill

2 Notimpaired.Hglowin2007&2010.PCBs,dieldrin,chlordanesaboveFCGs.

4 WestlakeLake

LMB Notimpaired.PCBs,dieldrinaboveFCGs.

4 CerritosParkLake

LMB,Carp,RBT

Impaired.PCBsaboveATL,DDTs,dieldrinaboveFCGs.New303(d)Listing

4 WildernessParkLake

CCAT,Carp

DieldrinaboveFCG.

4 HarborLake(LakeMachado)

Carp Notimpaired.PCBsaboveFCG.

4 BalboaLake Carp DDTs,dieldrinaboveFCG.4 Belvedere

ParkLakeCarp * PCBsat22ppb(aboveATL).Strong

Region4interestinsamplingthislake.

4 LakeCalabasas

LMB Notimpaired.PCBsaboveFCG.

4 LeggLake LMB,Carp,Redear,CCAT

3 Impaired.PCBsveryhighin2005.Hglowin2007and2010.PCBsaboveFCGin2010.New303(d)Listing

4 LincolnParkLake

LMB,Carp

2 Notimpaired.Hglowin2007&2010.PCBsaboveFCG.

4 SepulvedaLake

Carp PCBs,DDTs,dieldrinaboveFCGs.

4 TolucaLake LMB Notimpaired.PCBsaboveFCG.4 EchoLake LMB,

Carp* PCBsaboveATLsinpastsampling,

butcleanupandrestockinghave

Page 7: Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework ......Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of

occurred.Expectedtobecleannow.

Page 8: Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework ......Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of

Table4. CandidatesforinclusionintheCleanLakesStudy(continued).CandidatesfortheCleanLakesStudy:Region5.SeeTable3fortierandcolorscheme.LettersindicatepriorityoftheTier4lakes.Region Lake Species Tier Comments5 McCumberReservoir RBT 5 NorthBattleCreek

ReservoirBrownTrout

5 BlueLakes LMB Tribesinterested.Impaired.5 BigReservoir RBT 5 CaplesLake Brown

Trout4b Notimpaired.

5 FrenchMeadowsReservoir

RBT Impaired.

5 HellHoleReservoir BrownTrout

Impaired.

5 IceHouseReservoir RBT 4e 5 UnionValleyReservoir RBT AlsoSMB,1sample=0.4195 LakeofthePines LMB 4a Notimpaired.5 BowmanLake Brown

Trout PCBsaboveFCG

5 FaucherieLake RBT Impaired.5 JacksonMeadow

ReservoirRBT Impaired.

5 LakeSpaulding RBT BrownTr(n=5)=1.1,Chinook(n=3)=0.58

5 ScottsFlatReservoir RBT Impaired,BG,LMB,BrownTr,GreenSunfish

5 FullerLake BrownTrout

Notimpaired.

5 FeeleyLake Bullhead 5 KiddLake Bullhead 5 AntelopeLake LMB,

Bullhead1 Notimpaired.

5 BucksLake RBT Notimpaired.BrownTr(n=10)=0.069,LakeTr(n=5)=0.024

5 ButtValleyReservoir SMB Impaired.5 FrenchmanLake RBT 5 GoldLake RBT 4c 5 LittleGrassValley

ReservoirRBT

5 LakeAlmanor SMB Impaired.5 LakeDavis RBT,

Bullhead

Page 9: Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework ......Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of

5 LowerBucksLake Kokanee 5 ParadiseLake LMB Impaired.5 WhiskeytownLake LMB Impaired.5 CastleLake RBT 5 GumbootLake RBT 5 BigLake RBT,

Sucker

5 ReservoirC RBT 5 DuncanReservoir RBT,

Bullhead

5 IronCanyonReservoir RBT 5 LakeBritton SMB,

Carp3 Impaired.303(d)Listed

Suckerupto0.5in2006.SMB350meanabove0.2in2008.

5 MedicineLake BrookTrout

5 CaveLake BrookTrout

5 LilyLake RBT 5 LowerBearRiver

ReservoirRBT

5 LowerBlueLake‐AlpineCounty

RBT Impaired.DieldrinaboveFCG

5 UpperBlueLake RBT 5 WhitePinesLake RBT 5 LakeAlpine RBT 4d NearbySpicerMeadowalso

possible,butAlpinehadlowerHg.

5 Beardsley RBT 5 Pinecrest RBT 5 SpicerMeadow

ReservoirRBT

5 LaGrangeReservoir RBT 5 BassLake LMB,

Bullhead1 Notimpaired.

5 FlorenceLake BrownTrout

Notimpaired.

5 HuntingtonLake RBT 4f Kokanee(n=1)=0.105 MammothPool

ReservoirRBT

5 ContraLomaReservoir LMB Impaired.5 545TU0164 LMB,

Carp Impaired.WouldbeTier3,but

notpopularforfishing.PCBs,DDTs,dieldrinaboveFCG,

Page 10: Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework ......Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of

New303(d)Listing5 MarshinFresnoSlough LMB,

Bullhead Impaired.WouldbeTier3,but

notpopularforfishing.DDTs,dieldrinaboveFCG.New303(d)Listing

5 CourtrightReservoir RBT BrownTr(n=1)=0.065 HumeLake RBT 5 WishonReservoir RBT BrownTr(n=1)=0.29

Page 11: Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework ......Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of

Table4. CandidatesforinclusionintheCleanLakesStudy(continued).CandidatesfortheCleanLakesStudy:Region6.SeeTable3fortierandcolorscheme.LettersindicatepriorityoftheTier4lakes.Region Lake Species Tier Comments6 ElleryLake RBT 6 GrantLake RBT 6 GullLake RBT 6 JuneLake RBT 6 LundyLake RBT DieldrinaboveFCG.6 SaddlebagLake RBT DieldrinaboveFCG.6 TiogaLake RBT 6 ConvictLake RBT 6 LakeCrowley RBT 6 LakeGeorge RBT 6 LakeMary RBT 6 LakeMamie RBT 6 PleasantValley

ReservoirRBT

6 RockCreekLake RBT 6 LakeSabrina RBT 6 TwinLakes RBT DieldrinaboveFCG.6 ApolloLake RBT 6 PalmdaleLake LMB,

CCAT3 PCBS,dieldrinaboveFCG.New

303(d)Listing6 LakeGregory LMB,

Carp3 DieldrinaboveFCG.New

303(d)Listing6 SpringValleyLake RBT PCBsaboveFCG.6 BridgeportReservoir RBT 6 VirginiaLakes RBT 6 TopazLake Sucker,

RBT4b Verypopular.

6 IndianCreekReservoir RBT 4d DieldrinaboveFCG.Wastewaterwasdischargedintothisreservoirfordecades,NutrientTMDLwasdone,andtheyareactivelyoxygenatingthebottomtoreducenutrientmobilization.Duetoallthewastedischargedoverthedecades,i'mcuriouswhatanynon‐troutspeciesmayshow.Thisreservoirisratherwarm,andmaynotsupporttrout

Page 12: Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework ......Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of

long‐termwithoutcontinualphysicalmanipulations,Probablywillshifttowarm‐waterspeciesasclimatewarms).

6 FallenLeafLake LakeTrout

4c Notimpaired.PCBs,DDTs,dieldrin,chlordaneaboveFCG.Suspectpesticidesfromnumeroushomesaroundthelake;howevermaynotbeabletocaptureany"bottom"speciesinthisoligotrophic(cold)lake;ifdesignrequiresmultiplespecies,maykickthisoutofcleanlakesstudy)

6 LakeTahoe RBT 6 LakeTahoe‐TahoeKeys 4a Little/nodatafornon‐trout

species,whicharecaught&eatenbylocalpeople"ofcolor"[potentialEJissue];also,JRowanofDFWisactivelyshockingintheKeysLagoonssocostscouldbemodestcomparedtomobilizingawholecrew

6 ProsserCreekReservoir RBT 6 BocaReservoir Sucker,

RBT

6 StampedeReservoir RBT 6 EagleLake EagleLk

Trout

6 CraterLake RBT 6 DodgeReservoir RBT

Page 13: Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework ......Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of

Table4. CandidatesforinclusionintheCleanLakesStudy(continued).CandidatesfortheCleanLakesStudy:Region7.SeeTable3fortierandcolorscheme.LettersindicatepriorityoftheTier4lakes.Region Lake Species Tier Comments7 LakeHavasu Carp RB7planstosamplein20157 GeneWash

ReservoirLMB,Carp

1 Notimpaired.RB7planstosamplein2015

7 FergusonLake

LMB,Carp

1 Notimpaired.RB7planstosamplein2015

7 SenatorWashReservoir

LMB,Carp

1 Notimpaired.RB7planstosamplein2015

7 LakeCahuila Carp DDTsaboveFCG7 FigLake Tilapia,

Carp

7 RamerLake Crappie,Carp

Notimpaired.RB7planstosamplein2015

7 WiestLake CCAT,Carp

Notimpaired.RB7planstosamplein2015.PCBs,DDTs,dieldrinaboveFCG.

7 SunbeamLake

LMB,CCAT

2 Notimpaired.RB7planstosamplein2015.PCBs,DDTs,dieldrinaboveFCG.Datafrom2004only.

7 SaltonSea Tilapia RB7planstosamplein2015

Page 14: Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework ......Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of

Table4. CandidatesforinclusionintheCleanLakesStudy(continued).CandidatesfortheCleanLakesStudy:Region8.SeeTable3fortierandcolorscheme.LettersindicatepriorityoftheTier4lakes.Region Lake Species Tier Comments8 Lee

Lake/CoronaLake

LMB Impaired.PCBsaboveFCG.

8 LakeEvans LMB,Carp

2 Notimpaired.PCBsaboeFCG.

8 PradoLake LMB,Carp

2 Notimpaired.PCBsaboveFCG.

8 LakeHemet RBT,Carp

Notimpaired.

8 PerrisReservoir

LMB Notimpaired.PCBsandDDTsaboveFCG.

Page 15: Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework ......Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of

Table4. CandidatesforinclusionintheCleanLakesStudy(continued).CandidatesfortheCleanLakesStudy:Region9.SeeTable3fortierandcolorscheme.LettersindicatepriorityoftheTier4lakes.Region Lake Species Tier Comments9 Lake

HenshawLMB,Carp

3 Impaired.Popular.Sampledlotsoflargebass.OrganicsbelowFCGs.R9Samplinginlatesummerforcyanotoxinsintissues.New303(d)Listing

9 DixonLake LMB 4a Notimpaired.In/closetourbanizedareas.Lotsoffishingforstockedspecies(catfishinsummerandtroutinwinter).Popularforfishing.NewerReservoir,dambuiltin1960s?Storageforimportedwatertreatment.

9 LakeWohlford

LMB Notimpaired.Moderatelypopular.Privateboatsprohibited.DownstreamfromHenshaw…receivesHenshawwaterviacanal

9 LakePoway LMB 4b Notimpaired.In/closetourbanizedareas.Lotsoffishingforstockedspecies(catfishinsummerandtroutinwinter).Popularforfishing.NewerReservoir,dambuiltin1971.Storageforimportedwatertreatment.

9 LakeJennings

LMB,CCAT

3 Impaired.DieldrinaboveFCG.New303(d)Listing

Page 16: Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework ......Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of

Table5. Tierassignmentsforcandidatelakes.Tier1

1. AntelopeLake(R5)2. BassLake(R5)3. GeneWashReservoir(R7)4. FergusonLake(R7)5. SenatorWashReservoir(R7)

Tier2

1. LopezLake(R3)2. LincolnParkLake(R4)3. MalibouLake(R4)4. SunbeamLake(R7)5. LakeEvans(R8)6. PradoLake(R8)

Tier3

1. CastaicLagoon(R4)2. LeggLake(R4)3. PalmdaleLake(R6)4. LakeGregory(R6)5. LakeHenshaw(R9)6. LakeJennings(R9)

Tier4(topchoicesforeachregionshown,inpriorityorder)

1. LewistonLake(R1)2. LakeofthePines(R5)3. CaplesLake(R5)4. GoldLake(R5)5. LakeAlpine(R5)6. IceHouseReservoir(R5)7. HuntingtonLake(R5)8. LakeTahoe(TahoeKeys)(R6)9. TopazLake(R6)10. FallenLeafLake(R6)11. IndianCreekReservoir(R6)12. DixonLake(R9)

Page 17: Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework ......Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of

Table6. Targetspeciesandtheircharacteristics.12 ForagingType TrophicLevel Distribution Species Water

columnBottomfeeder

LowEleva‐tion

Foothills

HighElevation

PriorityforCollection

Largemouthbass X 4 X X A Smallmouthbass X 4 X X ASpottedbass X 4 X X ASacramentopikeminnow X 4 X X BWhitecatfish X 4 X X A Brownbullhead X 3 X BChannelcatfish X 4 X X A Carp X 3 X X A Sacramentosucker X 3 X X BTilapia X 3 BBluegill X 3 X X BGreensunfish X 3 X X BCrappie X 3/4 X X BRedearsunfish X 3 X X BRainbowtrout X 3/4 X X X A Browntrout X 3/4 X X ABrooktrout X 3 X AKokanee X 3 ? X X B3Trophiclevelsarethehierarchicalstrataofafoodwebcharacterizedbyorganismsthatarethesamenumberofstepsremoved4fromtheprimaryproducers.TheUSEPA’s1997MercuryStudyReporttoCongressusedthefollowingcriteriatodesignate5trophiclevelsbasedonanorganism’sfeedinghabits:6

Trophiclevel1:Phytoplankton.7Trophiclevel2:Zooplanktonandbenthicinvertebrates.8Trophiclevel3:Organismsthatconsumezooplankton,benthicinvertebrates,andTL2organisms.9Trophiclevel4:Organismsthatconsumetrophiclevel3organisms.10

X widely abundant x less widely abundant “A” primary target for collection “B” secondary target for collection 11

Page 18: Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework ......Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of

Table7. Targetspecies,sizeranges,andprocessinginstructions. Processas

Individuals(I)and/orComposites

(C)

Processfor

Organics

NumbersandSizeRanges(mm)

PrimaryTargets:stayonlocationuntiloneofthesetargetsfrombothGroup1and2isobtainedGroup1)PredatorBlackbass I 2X(200‐249),2X(250‐304),5X(305‐

407),2X(>407)Sacramentopikeminnow

I 3X(200‐300),3X(300‐400),3X(400‐500)

Browntrout IandC X 3X(200‐300),3X(300‐400),3X(400‐500)

Rainbowtrout

IandC X 5X(300‐400)

Brooktrout IandC X 5X(300‐400)Group2)BottomfeederWhitecatfish C X 5X(229‐305)Channelcatfish

C X 5X(375‐500)

Commoncarp C X 5X(450‐600)Brownbullhead

C 5X(262‐350)

Sacramentosucker

C X 5X(375‐500)

SecondaryTargets:collecttheseifprimarytargetsarenotavailableBluegill C X 5X(127‐170)Redearsunfish

C X

5X(165‐220)

Blackcrappie C X 5X(187‐250)Tilapia C XxGreensunfish C XxKokanee Xx

Page 19: Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework ......Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of
Page 20: Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework ......Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of

Table8. Summaryofanalytesincludedinthestudy. Analyte IncludedinStudy?Methylmercury1 Someindividuals,allcompositesPCBs OnecompositeperlocationDDTs OnecompositeperlocationDieldrin OnecompositeperlocationAldrin OnecompositeperlocationChlordanes OnecompositeperlocationSelenium SelectedcompositesbasedonregionalneedsMicrocystins Notincluded(exceptforworkfundedbyRegion9)PBDEs NotincludedDioxins NotincludedPerfluorinatedchemicals

Notincluded

Omega‐3fattyacids Notincluded1Measuredastotalmercury,whichprovidesadirectestimateofmethylmercuryinfishmuscle.

Page 21: Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework ......Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of

Table9. Parameterstobemeasured.

FISH ATTRIBUTES 1. Totallength2. Forklength3. Weight4. Sex5. Moisture6. Lipidcontent7. Age(forblackbass)

METALS AND METALLOIDS 1. Totalmercury2. Selenium

PESTICIDES 

Chlordanes 1. Chlordane,cis‐2. Chlordane,trans‐3. Heptachlor4. Heptachlorepoxide5. Nonachlor,cis‐6. Nonachlor,trans‐7. Oxychlordane

DDTs 1. DDD(o,p')2. DDD(p,p')3. DDE(o,p')4. DDE(p,p')5. DDMU(p,p')6. DDT(o,p')7. DDT(p,p')

Cyclodienes 1. Aldrin2. Dieldrin3. Endrin

HCHs 1. HCH,alpha2. HCH,beta

Others 1. Dacthal

Page 22: Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework ......Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of

2. EndosulfanI3. Hexachlorobenzene4. Methoxychlor5. Mirex6. Oxadiazon

PCBs    1. PCB0082. PCB0113. PCB0184. PCB0275. PCB0286. PCB0297. PCB0318. PCB0339. PCB04410. PCB04911. PCB05212. PCB05613. PCB06014. PCB06415. PCB06616. PCB07017. PCB07418. PCB07719. PCB08720. PCB09521. PCB09722. PCB09923. PCB10124. PCB10525. PCB11026. PCB11427. PCB11828. PCB12629. PCB12830. PCB13731. PCB13832. PCB14133. PCB14634. PCB14935. PCB15136. PCB15337. PCB15638. PCB15739. PCB158

Page 23: Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework ......Table 1. Bioaccumulation monitoring assessment framework for the fishing beneficial use. D.1. Determine the status of

40. PCB16941. PCB17042. PCB17443. PCB17744. PCB18045. PCB18346. PCB18747. PCB18948. PCB19449. PCB19550. PCB198/19951. PCB20052. PCB20153. PCB20354. PCB20655. PCB209

Algal Toxins    

Microcystins1. MCY‐RR2. MCY‐LR3. MCY‐YR4. MCY‐LAMCmetabolites1. Desmethyl‐LR2. Desmethyl‐RRCyanotoxins1. anatoxina