Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
' ''4
' f" Jj -3 ti - J" s V -
i 1
xv-
"N, it--' -' :"-, 'aI;'---'
' j&Zr'- - ,v;v -- ;r, --"V ; v
Cr lor ii
t7' L- - c o 4"Hf aa ."" A' 1 .Jx "V'4." - - X--- , r& fit r aI W V J -IU I
-.--. i
VOLUME XXIV. NO. 27.PAULDIN9, MKS1PSIPL APRIL 19, 1801.i!Y CARTER & SHANNOX.
Tte Stale or 31 .ljp, ?Pfftrt the detain and po-vr- r of attorney, andUie,a not attempt to show th.it Wi.iiamaHard Times Outdone. (Eastern (larton.LAW NOTiCKS. I MKDICAI. NOTlCiX spoke of them and acknowledged his execution or them.POISD In Prd'itt Omrt cf mid CouA h Xray
",Wm. A. L. lc--
To M. F. W,k: I
UK. H.N1II. A UPKI I., This evidence appears clearly to be in-
sufficient to prove the execution of theJ M K
i r I, PAULDING. MISS.i.- - n' urr rfii.'if uM ft!v-"- tiJjr rt will
"TOU tire) hrebv nctifipd r. and 8p.X lifior. ihe frobAt-- ' t of Nen instrument ujmii an issue ot nom rst Ja- -
if v - I
rut. Aud in audition to this, the re u. of flr. lied Mnn- -ton Cow.'y, Mii-ijipi- , on Friday, April 19, 161. evidence strong!? tfudintr to create thedv in JiU-- r next, on trie Im of aaitl
BOARD Of IBrsTEES,M W'LKlsa, PreatOetit.
JaN fS.p m -- H
H a' iHI L."'- E1
V CHALM Kksi and Treasurer.FACCLTf ,
jr-- !AH, M A Princpa!, Prof, of! "ral' an i ln:!l--tu- J uiiooj,hj, aud Poiitii ai
"mJT i--T. X A Teher of aaaaicnaod .a
"i ViT-LE-. Prof--r of Mn-i- c.
jHJ 3 Nrt, Hai.i'. h Brnnfn and French.SJXi 5r.itK KU.IuTT. rmciieb Hrnhe.Siime M. i i:,--, k. t , "i iiai ii ' n i.i lparuiiwnl aui
Ioi. t tlntT !u,' why I p'llion ofKll. . I. Illl.l.lClt,tl ksr- - K. VI. ruardiun,
suspicion of fraud ia obtaining the instru-ments.
Upon the whole case, we think that thedecree is correct, and it is afUrtued.
IIa.ndt.ir f'r ft diriiion of the real est,. f il. Bl- -
LET T.IE MlFTa BC1LD rr TfiE SOrTD !
:tlO.OOO Worth of FARMS aadBXJII-.13I1STC- 3- LOTS,
tls :l-- fU'Ha f V'rrm. 'plr Com- -
- i. . 4'wn tim rFrru ri:.' nj m tT'-- w tn Jj Tjj- -
i I, m e M h.-p ind" "Wi- -
T- - ID I r U ft h' h Wlit fflmfM'' fr I'm
t fivMi rr Cii:i.'ii4 rf rrtUiiJ- - of cootra- tmt I prffj
ti m ii iu i Mt'Tf iiiijc-mifa- wij! h fn.H .:! iu , a Trv ate ink iK l"Ura
mtiith. full aru-iiir- feuwntim Anen- -
Pr. Rj'TaJ. dr hn Va.Orto J- - i .;i.';KKl.L A.'aL
Ki' tK1' tout, Mwa.
lock Ut.-a4- . ehi-ui- not bnBv order of ihe Court.
ho.l ai I !h (hi"hl- --r" . and r Thomas lUssara t t al.mv
StituK CiKriT CjrmT. The CircuitCourt lor Newton county met on Mondayof lot weekan i adjourned on Thursday.
Moot of the important ca-- es were con-
tinued, which accoti nU for the short timethe court continued in aeesion.
I,. W. Jiiurtcan. and Wa II. Faynewere admitted to tho bar. The latter
wa a lMa-ta- firaetitioner ia
Afiril
A. II OtKKK,V A 1 LAW,
"ii-- -.
.1,
KAl.HanJ ami ojTSrxl. A. P.
vs.James L. lay, et al
W. iVEIU,i u it a B o if. h BranWif.D B X T A Mi-- i r.. a. rFVfrr. r. JAS. A. W!!-- ; Clprk.
April 12, f 20 ot.'.!J.I.I Il.tMUt ,
I H V . V T LAW,.'..; . a I t .
To aTrfTs,r$"jii
port his proceed mps thereon to thatCourt that llogat: afui raid, u.t-d- .
and the appellants were duly apointedhis executors anJ qualified as such inAugust 155 ; aud that Surget also diedin 1 he same year that since the dte cfdecree, Bingaman has made partial pay-men- ta
upoa the debts ascertained in lhedecree, there being still a balance dueand unpaid, and that, by reason of thedeath of Hoggatt and Surget, the decreecould not teexecutcd.
It further states that by reason of theamendment to the constituti in adoptedFebruary tith l.Viti, abolishing the Supe-rior Court of Chancory and the Vice-Chanc-
Courta, the complainants badno remedy in the Court where the decreewas rendered for revivor and executionof that decree, because the same waa not"a mum depending" in that, Court at thedate of this amendment to Ihe Coitxti.tution, ; and prays "tor revivor in thenames of Hoggati'a executors, for an
of the sum due on the moitgsgedebt, and for the apoiiiimeiit ol a
to sell the property in defaultof payment he.
A general demurrer to this bill waafiled by Bmgsman and the exicuiors ofSurget, which was sustained and the billdiamsKaed ; and the complainants Lavetaken this appeal.
The ground of defence relied on undertho demurrer is. that the jurisdiction ofthe original cause in which tne decree,of foreclosure was rend'-ical- , waa eoiiiin-i- n
d in the Court whenthis bill was filed, and hence that tgieChancery Court of Adams County hadnot then jurisdiction to entertain thisbill. The provision of the amendment iothe Constitution all'ecting the juried eiion
BOABDIXfi DEPARTSHST,MR- MRH. wrsT. f
. .
RATES OF TXJIXIOlsr.ThefVhol.iic vf. teirnn.n 1st M.iadar in
''.''1J' IB Juno, be
i UiM'teia, jj:J L now located at IVeatur.
Outward Bound.ST naaaBaa.
From the shiniox trd of childhood.went tailing, long ago.
Laden with ttie ncheat treasureWhich my h.art caa erer ka w,
Thoni-ii- a pure as morning dew-dro-
Kannea like the rainbow gay.Dreams aa sweet a ta, ry irui.io,
Hope a blithe as birds ta May,But though I bare long been aearching,
Touta's loet tnaaeuiea ne'er ar found;And 1 sead forth other "rent urea.
But they all are outward bound.
Outward bound acroMthe ocean.Which ao many teane at preal;
lo rip'o a, trie water,Nat., tl a trac'- - o'er whiji they aneal.
Vainly wat h 1 for their coming.Vainly a. an the awelting main.
And I fear tbo-i- e fairy veeaeleWill not meet my game again.
Wbee I call, there ia no answer,Echo eniy mocks the sound.
Hot a ..ail in the horizonFor they all were out ward bound.
None come back with golden cargoes,None with tropic fruit appear,
From the islands a here Life's aooa-ti- d
Make a summer a!l the year,gooatite shad.-- s of night will gather,
ra,m Ltf.i's sky t oremtat.And th n. looking to the Future,
I shall hal f'Tt-e-t the Past.When my bark shall leare. its mooring".
When I. too, am outward bound,In Eurnity' c.lm heavea
My I.e.! treasure shall be found!
flfrnent of ttiPe-:a- l tKSKV MOX-iE-
defeaAtnl. or in $ rcixirtof Kan- -
'IKf t'u m':i' fff tea i rin .t prutraic
tuti.. ma i II. M - ;t5 'i n ultttt.n f tn- -r m fit jiitujK ol tijcn-
CliS. COTT01, Ml.iilM.n I WALT0.1
No case was tried io court, and nothingoccurred otherwise, worthy of especialnotice.I UI l PTII H,
v n r a JT I ' nA
A'
d 41 mi" "O"Primarji lrui.J". P' '.."lnurmeiiu, mA. mi- -,
I i!t.- -
Muern lannu.!Muaic on Plan' 'I of Bia.Irraw on and pjinucg in Water Colors,ill .
Ui ttrkai- - Enrjulerr,Matricnlu.. lee
ia.lu lingli;hu,fuel and waah-in-u
per n
t13 be16 IM
2... 00A UO
111 0,1
Jta 4)
1 unJi e.10
3 00
ffi 00
- If II ii-.- r fi" fr ... il(J - Ji y i i r
Armi. M Hilar j Inlfbrma, itc.t ir il - ni Tn f a rotnpttiy of 6wjfi pr--
f ri io -- ti rr- iti if .f Tiy aniui ntu, n tl ir o:. ' Hi.d upward, lh
xm','' n Arrii Mt.Uary l.n r.. anrM n A ry
. h- uti-n- l thini;--- ani'Huit hy if. t.r-- t WtdManv u Augutrf.
io I f.f"i-i- i ih- on tiiiKK'k u a pr-- itru f $ ?w ; tn nit Uritct, to1."'; t'- nxi liif-- i u $1. tn n.t
l" I '' f ''r lurat ti $.") (
m-li- i r' to h; th ninMinurt-- d n X' ldWi'-- t, enoh ; t'i tltrii. mi Lir-- in ii. if; Uii--r hundred n- mt
l.r'l io f: t Ihoij-Hn- d lar-t- ,
f. $ (; th thirty-fou- r ii- -it U'k.-.i- , i (, wti ;
uj X.. pr n wli- U'iji t olii n ijt-- r "tf ihr. torin rXT prrimuni uf ti.-''- li ur pad in ah,lirtil r.'U'i-- , Arm "f M .!;tiry l .ili.nc u inyt
A fi t th I r of Rjij-p .trtrinok'oni'ny ai Port K.ytt, .'g'f a; r
I .I. f'Ht "titt-- ii- i: iiiurip t. prry an--
I.y tint- - an 1 Ni-- M M K V f r i1..
Ii I'.
This bill waa filed by the plaintiffs inerror for a partition of certain lands giwinch i hey claim a joint interrn wiihthe
'di;!?ndai?ls.It sets forth the tit le of the complain-
ants, and shows thai a partition of thepremises had been m ute between the de-fendants by a petition and proceedings inthe Probate Court, in which the rights andinterest ot the complainants were not no-ticed and were wholly disregarded. Theseproceedings are allgid to have beenfraudulently conducted as to the" com-
plainants and to be unjust and illegal :
and the prayer is that the partition be etaside, and a partition be made giving tothe complaiuants their portion, ol thepre-n- i
ises.The answers of two of the defendants,
principally interested in the property, de-
ny the title of the complainants, set uptheir own titles and aver that the parti-tion was fairlv and legally made, andthey claim by virtue of adveive jeionagiiiust the complainants and in virtue otthe partition wlnrh was ninde e thelegal title of the complainants was ac-
quired.The case was submitted on final hear-
ing in the court Ik low upon the plead-ings ard proofs; but at whose instancedoes not apt-oa- r by the record. There is
. 4 W,
.,f it - f !h' Jll.l'i-la- l
l
wt i,')Tn, w!"-r- Mir tr'-'n-t ut n r
r hr tin.'ii-rai- .
totit.". Ami ' VyJ. T. TAXAKIflL'lT. l7l..ut M. r.Kt: a.
n J. . r.l.At h. at M.r to
PlSCO.VTlSCAM I OF AM OlO Joi' At.
TheFennylvauian newnpaper, which formore than twenty years, was regarded aathe organ of the National Demi:racy ofPennsylvania, baa been discontinued forwant of patronage.
The "Pennsylvanian" was started inlto2, under the auspices of the Jacksonparty of Philadelphia, upon the detwclionof the "Inquirer," an original Democraticpaper. Subsequently, the "IViinsv lvan-ian- "
was edited by Joe. C. Neale, Esq.,better known to the literati than to thepoliticiansof the country. James GordonBennett also wrote for it a time, and ad-
ded no little to its reputation as a spicyand vigorous partizan journal. John V.
Forney became connected with it sometime during Mr. Polk's Administration,and remained in it some ten years ormore the most of which time aa Editor- -
!r. h 1 tf
h 1:1 H ht'll ' it ti II 't.tm w' f rim., '!. If. 1h' 11
ora .1. joiifA, Atlrmnif tor of laid etnt. showine the his int-Lat-
7"U art- - hereby ci t iji b and appearX in and l.ror t bo fi oleti Omrt ofJa-"- r C.mnty, ut the (i t H.u thpre-o- f.
on the fir-,- tin June. A. V.lt"l, then and tliert loi ny cju if anyyou din why the tirsn.1 tn.untot" K.ii-um- i.1. Jone. Adiuininrntiaif lhe ofHenry Monger. dcea -- hould lot bealliiH-e-d- , and tlie rrjnf Haiti aatnini.-i-truto- r
sliowin-- ; the of aidirhouldnot lie reefifiii'I d.'1-ree- there-upon ueforilinjrly, ntnlurtiier to ti.i amip'rfij,rm eoi'h othertln sts shall lieeoti-Hi.Wf- d
and ordt-re- i the (xiurt afore-ua'- nl
in the .r;'ini.i-5- . "t
IVittim the Hm. anjamin Tbijrpen,.Iudi:e of the Prob..3t,urt of enid cmn-fi- ',
the lit Mond.iy ini.ril, A. I).s ' n. Uiven uie mv hand ami seal
( -- KAL of offiee.HStli day of April,CTJ K. . i.,irTHOMAS V.KAYS0X, CTerk.
April 12, J ' ! f CO Ot
Entateol'll. t:.tholi. ctrcesiwedi1 J 11 Kli EAS ! of Admini-itratio-
1 Y were prant.so the uinler-,ined- ,
at the I;i-i- t FebruaJYrru, A. 1. i.st'.l, ofthe Probate Court Newton County, onthe eotnte of H. f;iClIiI-S- , decaed.Now all person hii-- claitng against saidestate are hereby litied to exhibit themduly j robated aIlIeitered within thetime required by f, or they will ba for-ever barred. !
HA I? I? NICHOLS, Adm'r.
(luoisic Diseases lured.
DR. W. R. MOSELEY,of the v Courts is as follotvs!. ".i tl II A
..1 KtH.t--IT! on. a. j. m a no "The Superior Court ot Chmieciy ami
the several Conns shallII I'l.lMiin-- i p "fully mv;i tii atuntKn of continue as now organized until the tirtb A WJ. I.. MOKKIH,k , i. v a r! I.K K'.,H. M .
nfiii,(v, H- - niy rHFi'i ai n- m Sir
Apil 14. 1&. -'j Monday in JSovcmbeJ ll"i5i , tor the disposition of cases now depending therein."7 lr
DECISIONS OF THE HIGH COURT.
OCTOBEK TKRBI, !.aaiataraB szraasai.1 roa ras s.srasa clabjoh
Lock, Brummette it Lock 1
va. 053SJoseph M. Jane, et al. J
This bill waa filed by the appellants
3d amend, to Constitution, Rev. Code oK.iUU tkrriw.iik a-- a J. w. wi?i .T, fr.
Or. llrltlffa t UlnsaU,
Bonrd ni psyie one h!f in adrsui"the MialMi a il'"-- ' ' ' J" i et.rB- -. exCIH liie i:ieenl'a'""e lee wlui ii it. iu VHn l,y in ura'.ce. aill he naiie from the I'nie ..f iilmiii-i- . lo
! ear i- n i Ueilii-ii,.n- Iri.m then'. ""'I' '' m ex- pi in i ai-- ol protrj.t-e- d
,"n Prm. ij.ala Ant Totine li'iy aepirmi. in tin liooor of the
iflii.1 puiene ai.,i n.ake loryIU Ih e.ilieia-- .'iiiir.e: ai.'l iioHii e eoiif'-rre- till tlt are lli.'l.
Art one- hnwcTer, tiwicr dtrrefkia of her ormat piir-m- e auy irr-?- at . o.ir-e- , aud ..!,. I
be e.it.lled to a rertifi.-at- ol ana iino'lsi'i.aa. Hdies will tie biken frini BronksviUe
IVpoi oe the Mi. bile and Ohio Kml R.iiul lo thediunce of eighteen miles w tliout ehari;,.
JAMtjj CUALMtm, Bee-jr-
Oct ji. i"'1 1!!L
"ISNEY ACADEMY,IBNEY, ALABAMA.
preaent S..ion ol th. Institution,1.ITE 8eptemler 3rd. will oon'tnii, tenun ler the charge of Mr. H J t A K 1' KR in the Muleand Mian A. A. t ARRlMVloN in lhe Kemale I'eiiart-ment- -
Larce and comm. rioii bmlii niri. hare Im. nerected, and are now furni-diei- i in a t;. h to meet ihedemandi ot a lare ami flmiriKhiiiit The lo-
cation i plertaant and healthy, with exeiit.ot aoeialand relipi'-- .nvileiri..
The ordinary nnrte-'- will te elaiwed inthree dutinot crude.: The Iiepartment"'w ll be limited ht Keadini:. Wri'me Primary
and Pnrrmry Antl.tneti.. The ln:.Tine.'-i-)e'riment ' wilt aid to i rimarT .tinli . (ieoirriiphy
i;rroror. FTo"iitioD. Wntri n Aiithinatii. and Kiil'-Ii-
l onipo-i'io- Tiie -- Hih. r I 'efMrtm.-nt'- ' willembrace I.a':n and I. reek The JSamraJ .ieiiei.The Higher Mnthem::ii a. Ac.
larM or TtiTio rut tun or rrrx aoTTiis:
The question of .jurisdiction, therefore.
fi lit of t i tii- -i . II ho done aaxUui4Trt- ii'-- in n ;,7 ti' '"iiti.Tn a and thr
mi. Ii ' it' ' d ol tfiru r who h v, and ran- i! f - ktll in th trtatnieut of mil
J, i - - Tix:iii- 'Iuii'.r ?rr.i:T.r!pii. Fittjla. fiypki- -
h or Fk- .'iioi : tioa, . (ih--- u
iM't-r- . a I'.H'M-t!- , I Ttppti,depends upon whether the cause standir
very little proof touching the materialquestion of lhe title ot the complainants,and upon the controverted point whetherthev were entithnl either at law or in
t Mwii- ii, r r rr-r.-
ing in the Court at thelate of the amendment, on a decree offoreclosure unexecuted is to lie considrp-- . !''" r I'liMtn-- a a !iii-v- ,
r,p')-'P-
FluorIIIliii,. .'itr, JiaT--- l Vair--
Ky, While
l ifi if".-tn- t of !.i'-- ti titi I tti" mtrriiijn.MirX'litiT in !! tr!'Hi .f (M)n' n t(.f pfitt-M-l'-- n
nl tii.'K' 'i. th-- Nih ilt itounM ' i.iM.rni. l 'it i'.ni: t hi iwnaiil It, Wiit t'.f if "f Ma. 'I not. (
M'int. 1 Ii. t lhir i'i nk ! tf, ptjl hf"r t rf-'- -I niIh.Jn- - lr.l Hto-ii- ' fu ti tnMr pro!- j.io'iu. d'llifflt r a "? iiTiBd'-t- - of th
ered aa a "cause then dejending" in thatCourt ; for if it was, the proviaiou is pos
i. 1.-- r. ol tfi Kat and4, i.'i,ii. I f th A.mi.. Ac
equity to the interest in the lands claim-ed in the bill. It is quite clear, and in-
deed it appears to be admitted by thecounsel for the plaintiff in error, thattheir legal title is not fully established.
itive that the jurisdiction was continueduntil the first Monday of November liii.
Hut it is insisted that the lull should have and of course the jurisdiction of the Chan-cery Court of Adams County did notbeen retained, and the complainants al-
lowed to establish their title at law. However this may be if the complainants hadApril l'J, lMil. Zj-l- t
f. h.. Ol.l.l S,
;y. I.I.OB AT JW,.'.I.A.
.'" ; .!. . f .J, w Mir.it . ;... in M ii I... li
,i ... ii nu i r 4i- nl critiutiAj.. y.
. Ki' I. H K. M I S:, .,, i it.
II . M -- ti . .,1 I .n .. II Wnita.
. I II .n Vk in I" l.iKoo.
M ... " '" I'"i I It, hi. r. A l'r.
A tt ... W AIU., ' ;,i . i I'. i.r- -
, ., Tir, ttJM k r. kcll-
V A DKI.I.,r r v k r s a t i. i w ,
U.!i. h K! .'I K ' . Mm.ly
II. V . Tlllll),i, f 7.: : i'7--
. ,,rr pvblic,AM"
iniiil.ln I" fhinfirfi, i ,, m i.i i ni rv. sw,
( t. ft ,1 .f li.'Jll.lll'. lo Ii,. i ... . ..i u... '.r .1 . r
taken that course in the court below nRF ilhf.ST HESTlsT, AT RSTRnrttlSB. Vi.V
tiPil i no toilorntj i'in nl tiir tan-- -
liuijifjb lat M'nJy in March, Junr an i H.ntn.
liMir,ir lt !Hn-1- ' in prit Jtily nn.H N'tniiritHivixlf Hi May.'A'iti! a:ni
cannot avail them here and in the presant attitude of the case.
P i U" alli-'i'- wtthanv nl tt.-- . dia ahotildii.-- t tv l a i.iiiy tiav d'.n, who wa.,01 :i n liad IhkI Ui-- proatrat and ui
td to. m n r Ki. t"nt, or ('.tin r had e at niii ti.cir viial- a'd d. hiiititt.-- l thf r tyt' ma, th nh! ni in I itnnot rai- - lh hul I ran iiie.i-- f in nariy ii' wi'l fftM a pure in all rti- -
r .i.i- -- ; and 1 lKMi-- e !l Ciiri can bo cuind ifiik"n tiMi- -.
lr. !' run f mid at Iatidrdal Ppnnr'd!-i- .i pi hut th. t1i' t'-- r n h the ln-ti- t
l ru mtv . and "Mti-t- y thm'l thati. --.k nttt"h itr- wine to h incuiaW', I.ht-- i
f.-- urd hv l'i? kH and rnidi'a.t iiin.-M- an. I tiTi'.Ji' in-- s ni t ait pna of tii1
'n;:i S .;- - I', or -- ir'-- h! not.. All..iiiionnt'-a- .on- - a'l i'lyP ar t4i.r'i K'' u;l hitoT all the
'"n cim u I v it h i ir -. bl'. naf ita. Ac.' p riiontn in alviu.t, fr all caa?pr; d at iitHiin.
-- Ali m-- i of am' r miit undrr my fmm-lnt- ;
cr4 and . u. and f. v urn hif v&h
KMH TKD to the Jail ofSniiC'ouniy. Misaia-ipp- i, onFri 'be '2'Mi duv of Mareli,
During that period the paperwas con lucted with more than its formerability aa a political journal, and the con-fidence of the National Democracy wasliberally extended to it, Mr. Forney nothaving then exhibited the slightest lean-
ing to P.livclc Republicanism. Sincet e "Pennsylvanian'' has chanced handsseveral times, and the indications of itswaning fortunes have been noticeable forsome time. Ita recent editorials, however,have been characterized by marked abilityand found political sentiments. The dis-
continuance of the "Pennsylvanian" tellsbadly for the conpervatistu of Philadel-phia and the State of Pennsylvania, es-
pecially when we consider that its com-
petitors the "Ioquirer" the "fla-ette- ,"
the "North American," and the "Press,"which have all turned Black Republican,are in the full tide of nuccesa.
The case was submitted for final hear,...!0 00.... 15 ("0 ing uMn its merits. INo appleation warPnmare
Int. rmcd.A'.eU ijj tier " A. flUOl. a uplth bov whor. made to retain the lull until tlie title oi
M nl an .1 MondJty in Mnrt-h- , .Iun and H pv-- t fly's name i SIM. that be
b fs to Xmlntiii. I I lean, ofSifter Countv, Ala. Stud
JU V)
bxtiia:l I'rawin $10 (
.. on Pa ntiuit - I"... 16 Oo I En, broidery.- - 10 on
Tl'If. mi or mar plv. m y r. the coiup'ainanta could lie determined B'
law. It was submitted for final tlis)H.-- ition as it was resented ; an.i the question
Hutirline of
P- n
hii't n
Tiff- t '
h((. tj'!tt.i'' a Ifn' ill. (I'llit- rrniftimiiK an l"n a hi u' in y -
was, whether the complainants luui mad
claiming title in virtue of a deed ot assign-ment purorting to be executed by Reu-ben Williams, one of the heirs and
of Pavid Williams, deceased,conveying to the appellants all his inter-est in the estate, real and personal, ofIavid Williams, and in virtue of a powerof attorney purporting to be made tothem by said distributees ; and seeking torecover the interest so conveyed to theapjiellants. from the representatives of theestate in this Slate, the deed of assign-ment and power of attorney purporting tohave been executed in the State of Texas,whi'rv Reuben Williams had his domicileami died.
The defendants in their answer, deniedtheexecution of the instruments bv ReubenWilliams, under oath ; and as evidence oftheir due execution, the apellaiitH rely,iu the iiret place, upon the fuel they wereduly acknowledged lelore a competentolficer in the State of Texas, as appears bythe certificates of such ottier attached toor writteu upon them, which certificatesare proved to be genuine. These certifi-cates of acknowledgment would have en-
titled the instrument to record accordingto the laws of Texas, but the instrumentswere not placed upon record there. Andthe first question which arises is, whetherthe original instruments so acknowledged,but not recorded, are admissible in evi-dence when their execution is denied inpleading under oath, without furtherproof of tbeir execution
The allirmative of this proposition isinsisted on, in behalf of the appellants, on
I t U hnv nj ntfaiv""l in a irlMin Kniiitn" "! th iu rn'nii.r uni ry ImI;ii'-- m h'-- imir" - Tf fi d a case entitlm;' th-'i- n to iiave lliep'cvii.ti
partition set aside and a new partitionmade.
lh tic--t t, v aii a;'! htt-- urTtimtt ntl f: w- - a iitxrai pnew. -iiin. i..ii"n iwni nr inpu . tn hi
d rHti hvf tfo lio-ti- t of tho tin at Sulphcr an--
It is well settled that eoui'v will no!
attach in June 1868, when this bill wasfiled.
We think it very clear thnt the causevas "depending" in theCourt after the decree of foreclosure,tiKn principle and according to decis-ions of this Court.
It is true that a decree of foreclosuref a mortgage is, fur certain purH-e-
s aAnal decree. It is a final adjudication ofhe complainant's debt a.'a.nsl the tuorl--iigo-r.
and ot hia riiht to enforce itlyainst the ni. "it gulled ri.prrty. But the.nam object of the suit is to coniel (he.ay men t of the debt; ami acconling to'he course of the Court, that is eth ci. d bya commissioner appointed to einorec thelet ree, and, in default of payment bv Ihemortgagor, to sell the mortgaged prop-erty according to the direction, of lhe de-cree, and report his proceed Hi g to theCourt, which are not finally v.hd untili hey are confirmed by tho Conrl. TheCourt has full control over the proceed-ings touching the sale until final confir-mation of the sale, and over Ihe pay-ment and application of the purchaseiuoney between parties to the suit havingj oliMieting claium to it, if there he any,until the end and olject of ttie suit isfiimlly accomplished. This jurisdiction
h i!vl- - ti in th" hAll eotuiu;iniaii um protnp'.y a. A
Tuition will be rtiariied from time of entrance tillcloe of Venn, milee. alnen. e Iroin i. kin--a
r in e with .riT..re aimriii. im His. 'Inow iiuin"ierii( ix'y. i. rupidly ini.ri'rL.-iiii-
he Teui-h- r. Ilti' Ijeen e.ji.rieiitly hi umii. lae'. St-- ion. Iwtlti in the .l.e. mid ineiriH-tlni-
,.f tlie They l ave had lli'l'-- t xperi ,.e eie-wher-
but are n,.a p.rmani-ti'l- ,i m c!iarie nt'hl Thi'y a ill iee a can-iu-
iter the health and m .rum of U,aiilini.' pufnii.a- - hoard can be obtained at fr- in eilit to ten
dollar p. r month tnrther parucuiarts addreaethe Principal, or President ot t!.- lioai d.
A. A. STALLWoKlli, PrtmUnt
'ii- lin iim ti- in;.. om-i-.- limy !
'tnt th;i il noi iin.'.ili r" l. h- - - nwff-t-.itiM.i. nti, tfit h- - ntv 1'i.niid a( t.uirprir"'ti tift pri.f"-iii- ii Jiy i.
H.rK" U oun.rruut patron through tnttrir.
'1 kkm All work warrant.!, and harjra m'idrai'I n 11 14--1
r. i h ,a r at ll. u, M H-- t.
KM..K I '
r VIl.nM, W. K MiHKLr.V, M- 1'. decree a partition unless the tiiies of both
are clear. Garrett vs White, .1
Farties Ki. 13 ; Wilkin vs. Wilkin. 1 John.ft. m WILUftMU.
lJiudTdal hpnuxs MiMit."ppl.Ih n. HA. I.. ll-l- y
JOilN D. RATClTfFE,AT THK OLD STAND OF
boy i about ftv years old, nboiu ixfeet hih. bis I eye is aflecled, ppr-entl- y
by the 4iovh1 of a ealaraei, ki'le't ankle seeio have been put out olplace and is nidefornied (o some extei.t.Had on, tv recommitted, ketsey pantK,
nabui;r shilBid fzo.itee whi-ker- s. Thehair on the Ut of his head is worn ot",wh it'll he saf'is done by wenrlnp a bel."'hat he waifri'.iased bv Mr. lean frona Mr. WanT'treette County, Alabanit.That beraiay from Mr. Deau about the6th of Mar-t- .
The own required to come forwardprove pro5 and take him away, or hewill be deitli a "ordins to law.
WM. WATKIN.-a- ,
Shc tnd Jailor Smiih Countv.April liB'il. .'t
Or. It. V II . M . McKI.1M).ifCh. 3. Kor partition cannot be decreedexcept where the titles of both parties areclear. Much less could a prior partition.
t.,.(iiuK nil. AV) (M-t- hi 7.i"t ?s tiimarf rtp"'ftilVihi pr f."i. "nil fti-- i' in td'1 citiE n
ti t ii it v II nniv tit fl t no- - found ai ti made in behalf of one party, who is admitted to have a clear title, be aet asidefVuifM..1VI IMiOl IV IIII.LF.R
1 HOB. BoBKFB,L. H Hnr.LTO!,O. T. Wiroit,J. P. Kt,
unit-a.- " prufoni."ni'! mJ n.lX"l 25-- yApnl at the instance of another party claiming
a doubtful and controverted title.S on hand a Iwa-l- ot of IRV CtO Hj8, Clothm-?- .
f: ... ' "1 Hi' .T 'Mt 10 ill' i IhwUiW. , t ol.UAan
t I' '(in-- -. m ti m...- ti- - .1 .J n
J. MO ItOK,'r i la .
High Lifi in Washisoto.v. An intelli-
gent corresjiondent of one of the NewYork papers gives the following descrip-tion of Lincoln's last reception :
"The reception at the White House wasone ot the poorest even sf-e- in Washing-ton. Some of the strong minded womenfrom the Weft insisted on dancing theKail Splitter's dunce, which consisted inwalking in a zig-za- g manner from one sideof the room US the other, as though they
I W. P. K..Ha.-- Hp. H"" in hN'H'i, HarowarnI--tfOct. H. 1"W0.fa., C'ArWnte Co., Ala. As the case was presented it was subVlKJC. l.irtCK NIIIIM iWllh (iHlia-i- a5-.0. J. ORK,
UIOHIU K N T r N T 1ST. mitted for final d cree, the complainon!in "rtr. on rDih r,L... k in Drt of a !nre and Taned aa ROSE HILL ACADEMY.
claiming u decree fur partition. It is manr,'n-ii- t ..f 1'iiiiT HWI-.- and Nan-o-- 'kMiI'AT IA
. ul'i!-- . Ir.-- - -- ilk H'lrt-ii- t n'lT HI Te", Cuttf-d- i
"nai H, Ktoon 1 rmgwa, i ajm, Lrn! Trimmina, ifest from the nature of the deletices setut) to the complainant's title, that th.third of thia Inatftution corntnt-not- d
IHB the nrt M ii1kt in Msn h. uudi-- r the ourprof- vtM- rtoiliuif 1 niitil
mi i t p
W II.!. n'nd t"ht and tli" i
A p'tA I'- STOTICE the a'ltboritvof Art. 228, Revised CodeBaaiuU. is clriuly letiiiiicd by the ol the,kuhlji Jir f ""I"rat'i.i..t ij'nT'i'. im n - m m'", n"""r it tt ' ti " i it- - -- '" IIATKS OK TV1TIO?!. sen led : and ati it'vas M" !!(!( M 'I FTwaBaiia-- ri.:i.i;..i. t.n i,iiiiiiidu jici 101 uiaiii:o riri ert-- u illIii pir'!!--
.it. ttf- -!I For twont-o- n we k- - Oth craphy. Fending. purpose, it was proper for the court t
record of any ;&t;iTijo'.i"roTrequired or permitted to be recorded bythe laws of this Siate or of any other Stateor Territory of the United States, ic.
locree ; and unless Uie iu.iVhit House. The lrtcts of SenatorT May next.ad n.on,!! ir,front of door ot the Court
the town. Tauldinrr. in Jn.si.r-"touiil-
Wrilinsr. Iritnry and Ai iii.nH-iK-
onlinued, the object of the suit innv. " ISeward tnd Cauieron wre red with ntiHrne.ITWrkii 'I 1.
U.., ratio Ihu-.- wlio k:i" hsrn. sud forwhonUr o- - d..iM'
o.. Mr. U 5'. Wd. - - "' u im mK. h. .at
t n allmely fail tor want of power to appiopK.lit or nil y v v.-
.ramiimr. Gography, Arithmetic and History,oti or a'l. hall, when certified oy tne Clerk; in wtioseIn rt'ceivirijor hit friend . and in tthukinji'
hands with hia frit-nd- - Old Abo does the
deny the relief ; anil, there being no ap-
plication for leave to establish the complainanl's title at law, to dismiss the bill
Upon this view of the case, the decre.must be affirmed.
tie and distribute the purchase money.
LUil.1".,.Al.PAi'1-.- .
PLAINS,bo.MBVZINES,
MARIS'. .PLA1I.
lil NOHAMMOIL CAl-llA- l,
TAMHHA,FT.ANNt.Ld,
Tnvn.ivt,Tim K l LOl H!4,
rrRvin UK.P A I M
ieoTm iry, Alehra, Philosophy, Mentid or Mral. sell at p' auction, tue loilowing de-scribed 1. on which the Taxes tor theI. . . and the Court would possess no contiadII. TKIIH f,
. I I . ." lr . in r ail. 10ver its commissioner or the purchase of
office the record is kept, under his seal ofoffice, be received in evidence in all Courtsof this State, without accounting for theabsence of the original ; but if the execu
year lre dew anil unpaid, to wit: uj like a regular rail-eplitt- whohad just pone through the marriage cere-mony, and ww rect-ivin- g the eongraiula- -
latin and (irtH-- lAnni.Tr'(i'onorn-tr- andSurying. with th wU.i-- - l.ran.-h"- on- - or ail 20 0uirii'. Mi. Handv. ihemortgsged property. These procee--
Thi is aituftted in North F.H!t JitnT ti- -
tioii- - ot Ills lriendK. in his rett ilion he.rn Pauhhritand Knt'-rpri- in a h- Hhh and tt. tion ot such deed, bond or other writingi.on am.. Ii.lings, suliscqnent to the decree, are.lainly essential to the object ot the suit;,nd il the decree be final, in the ordinary
inir.'nt c immunitv n- ara an iae ooi.tintMi in,.ii.jv iimi ikUiRm (. ti. labors hardt--r HirliHp9 and poes through
rnort" hard work than anv ix ordinary men. i fnim!. at tt-- dotinif pr m .nth. inclu-hnf- shall be disputed by the opposite party on
oath, the original shall be produced, orOwner Uiti.ions of Soc.Htid l.ffhta. I ht I'rim-'pa- i na--- "itti Hn"x- -
Gates & Pleasants I
vs. 9040.John D. Flint, et al. )
The defend inls in behalf of the wife.
A rino aiaiTlmrnl ol 1. A I I aoaI.tv 'lut. t
t iv icceptation of the term, the jurisdictionof tn j ara in t,iiin.r. and h- rM-- n- could Mand. Western admirer- - lanry all... nr. m ''., lul Ui,l. U. nil (.Al l l.ll-- v
its absence accounted for beloresuch copy f the Court would be divested lor thel it (uir-.--i- m tfwiunij niKurr oi im his moveinwiiU are frenchy. shall be read. And such original whenlit ml 7 Mad Clothing,ir. u,iniinir anrl Win'fr wart.1
Uf hftiiftuca and iAtm. th. Prm' pl and main and necessary purose of the suit.l I ha Ci'iJ..-rii- - or Jane E. Flint, filed their bill in thear Ft.u'h-rnt-r-h- Mrtn riination nn--,1 !!... i t U .,u. uimri.i -- sAhlil.l-s- Hltll'l.K-"-. MaLTER." Hence it has been held, in rases of thisan.i II. dif-pli- wni r tIl't. im acknowledged or proved, according to the
laws of the State or Territory where exeBolts Prevented against Southern Sol Chancery Court to enjoin the sale of thO'linu- ,of N. V. l
Is. ftr. I . oi s
Nulliiuj" riiiurc Nolliius liuiu !
HODOE3. DAVIS & CO. S
At"TH"KIZEl HT
Acin ol the Lelwlatur.KuR Tllli Bt.NKKIT tiK
Th Washington County Academle.
UrillUint &hemr tor.Vov., 160ROYAL ITvyATA 1'LAX.
IA.W0 Prlmra, monnlla t.471,300:Will (WfonlMip !i thf fullnwintf
KOYA1. M.'HKMI-:- :
To be Ifratrn t'.itry salurtlay.
.ort. that the proceeding upon the detrilil P IKiiss lliiHS!'. i tiLLARS,IUMIA
:ld and . and vry will h" giventh moral ind rultivation ot pf'dint-- . toy Ac.
3 li. . S4 A' cuted, so as to be entitled to be recorded cree are tn Jt until the confirmation, byPiimia n n!'r at an time dunne tnmil anrthinr n the .IHti ur mat can neneraraslave George, claimed to be the separateproperty of the wile, levied on by virtueof an order of sale issued on a judgment
of H. F. 1..1 2 u :t- -i it: iumir. i.. h ' .nd will h fharp?d from tho time of rntorine to "he Court, ot theacts ot the commissioner.there, shall be evidence in this State
without further proof of its execution."Bl.rh Kmllu'l Tom..,1 I M Kt K,
h ' 4 .- "111 - ' Mlllll M
I ii,, ami ill in tin'he co- - of th t;m- unn-- s pn-F- r'C'1 jr-'- nn'-n- Herrod vs Henderson 2-- f Miss. 4. loo--J.K.l" if.s,HHmnif ra. Viw Srw Flate, - in attachment in favor of plaintills induni hy protrat d .wkn. wiji- h limp will hj do--
,.fS. K. 'il !
w. ' toi o i' !
'ii. r.W'f n id:!..f B K ' ,'...,.1. I .i " 'I N3of B.IA.lt..ot 4il.4oi' to
It is insisted that, by the latter clause ley vs. Gridley, 3 S & M 614; and thatd;teed tu'tion f"tndrnti irnm a illCarpenter I aol. error against one Edward B. Mosely, thejc:. :IVr.
8. Tuf of this Statute, an original deed, acknowlIi? required t pay Uiir tuition in aivan'e. ur mv he mrisdiction is retained alter decreeiii.r rhi.l". Plupei. Hiinimem. Mawa. Broad and father of defendant m error Jane r.,r?trenri (oi parent; cuarttian. or .oiTie i edged or proved according to the law of The bill states that many years beforevdiuT persi n .
i . a. tn ii-- n c vr o.-- ;ibecause it is essential to the execution ofthe decree. Gofl'vs Robins et al 33 Misa.the State where executed, so aa to be enI llt.l I. t. L- - n. I. ASS ITER,
fax collecter of Jasper CountyC A. BrL'DLEVoN, the time of filing said bill, the said Moselygave the said negro boy, a child, to his 153. Unlike a judgment at law, it re- -
Mrtrh 23. 1W. &mtitled to be recorded there, shall beevidence here without further proof of itsexecution, whether recorded there or not.
ClJoAii i.. an.l ererjllnns in the ham.
Hard ware.SaiK Traca, S.i(.l.- -. H..ea. Plow Point. Ac.
Caller)-- .
A flne ..nm :'t of T e and Po.kcl Cutlery.
Crockery aud Olaaa W.te.
iii ires the further action of the Court tosaid daughter, that on her intermarriageGuardian' Sale.Decatur High School. accomplish the main end of the suit ;I. ith John I). Hint, she took said tx)rtue and in pur-tianc- o ot a ue-- But we do not think that a careful ex
k STOVAI.I..i' a r la,. t ,.ii ni ma U'uru ol
. .11
.'j("lll.. I I. I ,t.l-- . 111- --.
t i .mi i nut f ('rTiTnrtont A,l - -
' 'tf
111' I Pr1 Pi if ol tnd thereiore the jurisdiction of thethe Probate Court of Jasper home with her and retained jHjssession irt
him until afterwards in the year --,...
Prif-"- fIn ITni-- a ''
fr,.'- - "I...lii Pri.-i- . i l ..
I, m Pi r. "l'...2.V1K1U Priiva of--
amination of the Statute will justify thinconstrui'titi--i.Mr. J. J- PERRT Principal of Male llep.artment iniist necessurily continue in the
Court. For the same reason, the lulehe of T k k.iy ami ila '." i eomplrte
.... i.ii
.... in........ A'.i.. !".. gl.lll
I Pr,- - o! ..I lr i nl ...I ..r Mi. 8. E. JAKVP, I'rm.'lpal ol M male Keparv one Vernon a constable-- chiiih to her houA- -
diers.An a matter of interest to many of our
readers, we iubli-- h the following lawwhich was pasned by the State Legisla-ture at its aebbion in January last:A V A CT to prevent suits against Southrm
Soldiers.Be it enacted by the Legislature of the
State of Mis8isetfpi, That ;t bhall be un-lawful to commence or r.ropecute anyfcuit or action for debt againt-- t ar y South-ern Soldier who may be called into ac-
tual service by the authorities of thUStale while he ia or may be engaged inthe military service of any of the South-ern .State;, and every party, attorney orother person offending against tins setthall be fined and im(rini-- d for contempt. The fine not to rxctfrnl fivetimf-- r the amount of the debt ued for,to be pnid to the soldier or hia family tsthe court bhail award.
Be it enactvd. That thin set take effectand be in force from and after its paa-biig-
e.
Approved, January 22, 1?C1.
The first clause of it applies to copies ofPrir of-- .. Caetlnne anii Hollaw Ware.an .ilfni Mii MARY C. WILMJ.N, Teacher in Hnsieal Ue-- held in Cole vs Miller 32 Miss. 89, is not
applicable to a decree like the one nn- -1i Pr artment the record of deeds. 4c, recorded, accord-ing lo the laws of the State where execu
and took said boy out of h.-- r possession byvirtue of several attach merits, in all olwhich she filed her claim, atlidavit and
A.pri.xViiVaii,in Pru.. anmuni.ng lo nn.t in is.iokfin lot Of Wfltl I'm- der consideration here.Rates af Taltlon er loa of fiveA tine K'lo'd ttiotif ry, c:iTr and Wnre.ted, ami makes them evidence generally.ntoBlui.
rRFPAHAToRY IEP.TMENT.Whol Ili.lv. ; (Junrtf m tS E glith- - Idisponing with the production of 'theAla
JUII1 0. WILKI"ii. . - ,. '
, . fl, rt ci 4i 'd'l.iit iii tm. - ' n a I tt
'.... :ivi In ! .a rui ..lAiitit-- .
'I 41 ttJn..'a.,(r. Wntini:. and Mental Ari'.h- - originals. 1 tie tecona clause applies to' . n on
VK r Ki I A mono. " - case where the originals of such deeds
It follows from this, that the jurisdic-tion of the y Court in theoriginal cause wa not divested a In n thisbill wa filed, and hence that the demur-rer wa projierly sustained.
Iecr'-- e affirmed.II a stir.
1NTF.RMEIH.VTE Ir.PRTMENT.-- hall be produced, to-wi- where the.1 kMK-- i W A T T. , .i.Kn.,i i r,inl,v. 1 ram roar. II isttir v andI pa raJTiHiar ?".ieni-e- "A LA W .AUDERDALE SPRINGS, execution is denied on oath ; and in suchcase, requiring that the original nhall be
( mane at the la.,t .htiiiia'y termthe, A. I). lMil, the undersigned, fiuar-th- e
persons and fif thenJlieirs of .IDSF.PII DANIEL, tle-,,,- ,,
will, on Monday, the Oth day ol
,;.rjl, between the hours prescribe.!f,., proceed to sell at the town o?
ti'jin, in Clark County, at public auo-t- i
the highest bidder, on a credit of. ntonttis from the "lay of sale, theiing described real in said,.v, to-i-t: W of N W i, N E j ol4 and S E of N W J and N W t ofi i of Kec. Is, in Township 1 N, ofje IT E. Said lands will be Bold sub-t- o
the lien presciilied by the statute,Hie pnrcha.-e- r will tie required to givewith good se ut'ty for tlie purchase
,ry, payable in twelve months fromday of tale.
EMILY WADE, Guardian.
HI'. HER ENGLISH IiEPARTMENTtiroduced. It then provides in what caseFOROE DOLLIRI
DRAWS HAlLY, AT O'CLOCK . AM"CHALYHIATE WATEPji ) lrcbr. r.C'.metrr. Pliilo.opht and i hcnu-drv- . t;i oui u, ... a.i,l Cr.wl. nr mthr of the Modern LaD- - such originals shall lie evidence, when the
i .S I'l .Sv M H '1 lss-
i. ii hi: i .I l i L A IT,
, i. MlA " ': .. tl .?rl
Christian Hoover, 1
vs. 0433.I.autlcrtlale County , Ils.orE- - mat i, mi. ,
B. B. fOIITH, 0 aa Proprlator,tS Sl'M BE ItS HVS BALLOT ijontma'ent charee, 1 v-
George Wells, Adm'r. ). ., i; &
Time charsred frt.m dar of entrance, and no deduc This action was brought by the defention mud. exoent for protractedlNii p'T-fha- d tha aViva fAvhi.na - andA ll.l. A. HM1TII.
T I n S . T I. A SCHEME. I A Mimcienl corp. OI competent win it iuattendance, of Southern birth, education and senu,,,!! P'rv r in- tn la-- t
ill. pTiril nr - ir uiikt- - t "ur- - in hi iient.
dant in error, as administrator of hia de-
ceased wife, for trovrr and conversion of aslave, the separate property of the wife,under the statute of 18,'J'J, in relation to
I Ju l.. tn-l- ll i. i ii .tiii t'lt p'hf trfOf-rali- thit 10 oat,n w.ll 1 uiti'n dne at the clone or each .'imu.Board can be had at ten and taeiTO dollars peri.. mi.-rt- , li"lth an-- l
.. 1 .. tlif Mir ti orHTT. oAny tUtf Tick. h N. on m ilUiin. tM.'
Z Il.jmm e aa.a"- - "month.Kiiiii u r theriehtsof married women. It appearwiU.-r- a; un.vf rtity rucd.d hy tli ldiS. Ot. I.fcl i. Jr.,
i A i I . Kor further purticular. aidren M arleton. r.. ;j.ril 5, 1S01. 214. iii'v ar Mtntd on ft Mohdt n.l)d that tbere were two children, the iu of
bond according to law, arid the boy wasreturned to her, ami has remained in herpossession ever since, (these ifilaeh meritshaving been since disposed of). Thatshe was wholly ignorant ol lhe levy olthe attachment ot Gates and Pleasants onsaid boy George, or she would have givenbond as in the other cases, and interjioscdher claim kc.
The bill prays an injunction, that thejudgment and order of sale be set aside,as to the boy Georgn Ac
An answer is filed by Gates, and proconfesso takan sto Imman, the constablewho claims to have levied this attach-ment without taking the property intohis possession. Gates in his answer de-
nies from information the gift, chargesthat it was fraudulent, that the boyGeorge belonged to her father Moselyadmits the levies of the several attach-ments by constable Vernon, that bondsAc, were given and property replevied,does not deny that Ihe proerty imme-
diately returned to the pasession of JaneE. Flint, as stated in the bill, nor does hestate that Iminari the constable who claimsto have levied the attachment, ever hadthe possession of the boy George, underbis original levy. He denies that JaneE. Flint had no notice of the levy of hisattachment Ac.
Anfjigreement is filed showing theclaiurand bond Ac. filed by Jane E.
Flint, and record, waived. The testimo
Vanlan. A. or Rett. J. Ir. N. llud.lie-to- n
execution is denied on oaib, withoutfurther proof of execution, to-wi-t, whensuch originals are acknowledged or provedaccording to the laws of the State whereexecuted, so as to be entitled to be re-
corded there. Throughout the secondclause, reference is made to the first clausewhich sjreaks of recorded deeds alone.On the denial of the execution of suchdeed that is, the recorded deed previous-ly mentioned it requires that the origi-nal shall be produced that is, the origi-nal of such deed, such recorded deed ;
and it provides that such original thatis, the original recorded deed previouslyspoken of when acknowledged or proved,Ac, so as to be entitled to be recordedwhere executed, shall be evidence. Itdoes not allow every original deed which
1 e. lel.i l .;n. ' ! Mo: ii; nd -- t n.v- - tho r- ni- -
..f.,.n ..f K iir 'd U tW'-r-- V -- hu fir nd 51 Rruard.R ANA WAY from
the marriage, who were living and infantsat the time the suit wa instituted; and
. H;,. . . i ;.i,111 I' .
i -- i.i i'I ! Fi,.hir Ju d ..n v.d Mot.,K nl ' !oo l to crinth. ar the subseri-u ii v 4n vr.w iiv istiti tf.v e' "" ' -- " 'iVkt W on the 'J.ith Anrust laat. ne--i: t. t:.e vny? of t!. Miiiotippi aud I'... kiwi--.-.
- - - .1 - - -- - . a - -
mm . m m aAim H im Tnk-- I ith a dmwn nunit- -r on it
iialii.u,! In .'i.nn out ai an? 111
pi . . i. h a K W. . or "J '1tuitii.a m ll. dma il
JSOMKOSE, JiSPEU CO., MISS. pro FRANK, about --1 years old.w 'l in at a1 timea. to--A
that, after the death of the wife, and be-
fore administration of her estate ftant.-- d
to the defendant in error, the slave was inthe rss session of the plaintiff in error, who
........ im,. 'i:i!-- "- t ft th Ka. roa I.
Rail Road Meeting.
At a meeting of a portion of the citizenof Newton county, d in I'ecattir, onMonday evening the Hth innt. M. Ware,
., was called to the chair, and Ir.M. II. Watkins aj,ointed Secretary. Hon.Robert McLain. waa on motion of Hon.M. M. Keith, requested to explain the ob-
ject of the meeting, which he mated waathe building of a .Railroad from enter-priF- e
to Granada in thia State, known asthe Enterprise and Memphis Railroad.Mr. McLain made a very able argumentin favor of the proposed road, showingthe nece"ity and praclibtlity of the road,its advantage to the people along the lineand through the section of country," it isUecigned to run ic. Kev. W. C. Turnerand Col. .J. H. Camplll, alao, addresaedthe tueeling addui-in- many fact to pro-r- e
copper color : wciizhs aliout lti'itt. I.K 111 AS,, A I I. A II . H19 naasn'cj Hho-d-. n;uitd twelve mil aoutTi hf I r p; ior h'.a rv- aetl known at the Spnnp has a sear on his rightI of th .iiti.ern K.n r vt is ol mvc,uiiu ,liir al cni.i.i1! Miaiob, r ri"y ';. nirtiii leadcra h.a trTue
'..i.r..- - nd ;ni-'ls-Tukrui fruiri tl.wi u any pn. . ai the alvt rates ! sold him in the year 1M7. Administrafr- - from the the cot imon to corner of one of hisan JTf-- pounds ; 1
:;;rVnd on thonThe heahJ.f iin- - of :f.e antl thel n iiiin or n-i pr-.-- i ft.!rin to th1, the back of Lis neckooitwr mi to. prirr mu ttnrf it to tU' i: quality of ar w. i .
' I! Inn or m.-r- wlfil-i- l nnmhrw ar,is a larjre seeit wart.-- H -- K... niiml.r -- O i.l- - ii . t iM ur r. and r:na n (kinoric th r
it ,:i-l- m!-.- .i of r.:b toeir Nort fo rn ne- pure. mora, innti-'n- ', aoa wiin d.o ou n ut u'-i he above reward will be piven for m- -.lr-.- aim.iu ill mi-l- .Irnan oumifM, ll.e Ii- k'f.rm- - iluriMi! .hf tui.uae- - of Lma. R. B. EM I IH is acknowledged or proved and recordedrn ea.-nt-
It ia indnenden-rih- e IVop-vto- r b. ini, andr lft Ht the Mitxixir.nioan, Oi!iC-f-m Ilia u to be read in evidence, without furtheri!,i. ScSon- - purha..m van a,eit tii rm-t- Hoard- - orctmn a. Aokn. ML., whirh viil lead to Ua re- -ova Num.! A. nroof of execution ; for it may be act-- f- I h- - S hOl wi t ' rOH!-.- lf a " -
iueat inland TaonocaarARE AmiJl LY ut. .oiiDit lao- i- nl - th tpveiy. ?irri , . t. !. TMHTTKU, knowledged er proved according to thelaw. of the State, and vet not be such an"arherr. young mea wjth hunihei at a cotiveu re. .nAlUUA i UiU hit.aA r LAW. COMBINATION PLAN
IiLw 1 ml l't 4 O ("AO- .-
CAPiTAL Z Si. . HlN. M. TllVt. "" the iaiioriaiice and tne imperative neoea- - as is entitled or authorized to
be bv the laws of the State.".Te roorth in adaire in all ee-- .Kul? rwd. inln'iini- - -. fur! and hghta, IlVanai" aT1wl.f.
aio.nnoi a j A.0001 3.ooot ao.ooo per monih. Tir,nf ntir ( ft:rmrnp.ot going to work in lament, ami
j.u.-hi- n on ttie completion of the R.tdHon. M. M. Keith then otfered the follow- -
LOW Itl . But it muat be an original of a recordeddfed. which is acknowledged or proved nv of Jane E. i taken in open court, who
runif-- in ttie n.irT r.nt.i!!...- .- x i. ...---. i. ,.ei -- j I ... Ua".t..i... I Ja-i- 't t Countv, ;.lis.t on uir ,nii ui proves the g; it (rom her father, ar.d that
io the bws of the Stale, so as- A l I 4 .
..,. it i. ,f Sinpon.k'ti ( fuiii.. ma in ai!
.t.z res lu;ious which were unauitnouaiy:nm-n- . f nati.-- h t i .... theUv has in her o.- f-r- ever.J T. kr' fr' : I H.r- mJ-- r r 1 .ar- - m;it. auiU'teti.i'i-- uvT irx'Uth- - W iha ciontt rug lion of a Jiiilr'ad.ih ftlMiW t..I , 1 ,fk rtaa-.. 1 t.. nr a wit,-- , ied and in fuit orr--( , of th- - hr"imr'ik(Tlnor 1,--
1 .. t f(k-loK- MAiK l .A.'m
to be eniiiled U le recorded there.The object of aui horiiting a
deed to be acknowledged or proved is,not to establish the instrument as the deedof the party for all purpow. but to enti- -
to run 1mm Grenada to Enterpri-- e Mtas..iii r,i on i"t of - .Tie an 1 I ajnl.nii. t eatii...
-- inc. she gave lhe claim honda to Verii'.nAc, Ac. i! s iireur.-- sain-- thecompetency of her testimony on severalgrounds, all of which it Is n.H tiiHt-r.- toconsider in th view we take of this ca.
..tiR'Tii: a, .. tr mi I - tvon uie ail w;M hruiat 'e.l and fix.ur- - ar.d forunnif a connection between the 51.U- -lit; m-i-
in vjti hit vc y r- a,tii!t,ir ie not nn in-- d and p;.- - nrrvn"i-ioi Miite
. . .. rtt m ot 1 "Ao HtH.-- K M iL A H ippi and Tennessee Kilroad, and thel'u p cjio. oais ean - n i .rom v.'J iov i - 'a t from iSn'd ri ni a C 6 t F J .
i iue evw, !i:rit;v arm rau'k tKen.Anv n.f'rm;m.n of fa;.I y will thftpk-fu'i- v
rtceivd, and all tUe ot hisarre-- t and ooritin me-n-t in jad that I
can eet him ag-- vr.il b frtrlv prtid.T. L. (i AN DY.
C.'.Wc, aljtj., March I'.l. f
On the bill and answer it must be taken.,.;- - K.:J-'ti- and tir. to I
;ij..-- --t ui ih Hit.Vrra I n ar I"'Hii as true that the bov George never wa leRTV. T. I). I.F.-K- C Teiii-- r.. a I h l.-- I fr. 'n M m ry
i.i riM.i itT ' ii.tr- - i rce ;i - f'.a-ra- i mail to ajiy od
rlM.ll;' - . .il n'V0 f.r ! ..riVrt-ifl.!- N V'! wF.Jr""tu'Uiil t K' li ! ''
M.S.-- J M A. M"lKfc- - rrt . t.
gaily in the poaea,ion of the officers who. t ih --Mi'.h. r!i K t 1 ' T' M K. K. 1. a": rriiinntal
I.UKKTT IKAHI,-- ... 1 A Liu
T 'i K V i T L A W ,W , M --.! !!
.r js. ; r ...f " v- i I woo M
.1 f . fM'th -- it of iUtJ--.
, s , rw4. a. i4t(HtP'1 a JKTIMNGI,
- 'pni,aa4 0,x - . -
trf mT' I'tatii for I'mon n Mon-laya- claims to have levied this attachment, itM K. M 11 nUal M
tion was first granted of the estate of thewile in the year IHj.j, and to the d"fen-lia- it
in error, who brought this action inthat vettr. It further appears that theslave tecame the separate proiter'y of thewife in 14.'-- , during the marriage, andthat her death took place in March, 1K-J-
Several exceptions were taken in theCourt below to the rulings of the court onthe trial, and are here insisted on aagrounds of reversal. But there is one ob-
jection of so vitai a character to the judg-ment, that it i need!. to r. Hauler anyother question raised in the ca.e.
It apfsesr that the slave in controversybecame the sefiarale rirorty of tha wifeunder the statute of .luring her marriage with the defendant in error, andthat she died in If 4ft, leaving childrenborn of the marriage, and her bus'. andsurviving. In such a case, it is well settledin this Court, that the surviving husbandis entitled to the possession ai.d usufructof the slave, during bis life, and after hiadeath, that it goes to the surviving chil-dren. Cameron v. Cameron ?J Mis 112.Steawlman vs. Holman, adm'r. 33 ib. SV).Smith vs. William. 3'i ib. 615. And if isheld in the second of these ca-s- , that theadministrator of the wife is not enl.lled tothe trosaeawion aa against the survivinghusband, except pThoj for the paymentot her d. ills, which tnu.t be shonn.
In order to maintain the action of tro-ver, it is necessary that the pl.iintift showtitle in himself at the time of inii"utingthe suit, and also the right of possession,and it is plain that neither of thew thingsis here shown. He show neither titlenorright of poseeasion in him as administra-tor, but the right of possession and aspecial property for life are shown in himin bis individual right, with the interestin remainder, so to to bis children.
.. .n- . t.: urt'i r " "t'-- . um- - : it'fin-- aiII, - L l i"-- M IA'., ia. n. wi -- The and the .pi. :..u-- t rr he eer made a levy it waa abandoned by; t i tn - ti e m ,x. Th- - "rsa on ihe -. ; tn- -June . W' d w th a to th- - inik:!ii a per' him, or the levy was void for want of , obr;i R i n run-- i vo Newton where fo L oi tne if reiu-- l Dractrn (
tle it to tie recoro-d- . ii trial onject iscarried out by having it recorded, thedeed is thereby so solemnized as to makethe recorded "original evidence, withoutfurther proof of execution, upon an iueof no ' fartvm. But if not recorded, itis not clothed with thai solemnity, thepurpose of the acknowledgement nothaving been consummated : and it standas a matter tn pan and must be proved ac-
cording to the general rules of evidence.Thus reviewing the question, we think
that the certificates of acknowledgment
.e"t w .t h session of the rirotierty bevied on. Peri XJ LLA. r-- THf ., is ifcxjt hi to an in theare eual Au. 1. sonal rirot'ertY ecu not be levied on with- -MUTiicm luiinoiD.TWO DAILY PAMKKK TRUSS. .if! y th- : ie And the drTen--- A
oultakirg it into the toseession of theSUMMERVILLE FEMALE EM!
4tItr.lnIrHtori olle.Ailmini-tretio- n
WUKiitAS of 1AV1I QUI NX,jVceaMtl. were .ranrl to the uiiil-rij;n-- el.
at the laat M.ari-- trm of th. 1'rr.bj.teCourt of S:mi ?n County, .Stat of M.sai---.il'l- 'i.
"uw a!! jfraori. having climiawair.-a- t the estate of said dHHifrit,
Tfouirtal to exhit.it the sain witb- -
aa(BM. officer or his agent.a r - !.. a tjr-P-- T Wt -: bow in r uion aII The levy beinit the only foundation ofM.-t-t . n n at Pwi i ni- Any ai--FOR YOb'Nfl LAD I j
nM c.
. ' n ih prvt-H- !
I i" '.vr. 'i' t'i,. v.. y
;i ll.,d a tti I
U.TT-S- f .! TWa
-- ? t r i i ir-ai- th coOTej aiif-- f to any the judgment, in a proceeding by attacb- -0 ut ta tte u" "'':".; iTT
Mobile and Ohio Ra lroad, i now beingagitated fcy the public mind along sai-- i
route, and" whereaa, the proi"oed routtouches a large portion of Newton coun-
tv. now destitute of Kaiirond facilities.1st. Jiohed, That we unite with others
along the proposed route in giving expres-sion to our entire confidence in the prac-tical utility, and final success of sail pro-
jected enterprise.td. That it becomes the citiz-
en-! rf thi county to unite with othersin ail lawful means, to secure at an earlyday. the cnnatruction of sai l lioad, form-
ing as it will, a connection, 'by the build-
ing of miles of Kaihoad.) whichgives a continuous line of Railway, for a.l.atsnceof a miles, between Mobile onthe S.nhern Gulf and Memphis on theiliaaiasippi river.
Z-- Jiovtd, That we hereby suggt stthe propriety of the citizens of theother eounu-- , through which it is pro-posed that said Road shall be built, hold-
ing primary meeting and selecting suit--
wrre ment avainst personal property, if therenrniTi tne insiruraraui in ur-nu- n-- M'iHaN tlYt'E. Propn-sto-
rw-i- rA t ". , waa no lew. or if the oliicer never took itTHT5 Vhcv-- . rTf-f- uitiu-m- 't "'" ;into his tromttiision at aii. the whole prol ia tn taiH:.'!, in ine upenon!- - i ,;.
Uie hLit ne-- e of it l"co:'T a 0jF th m.j ret aK--tri'- of ceedings founded on it were void as to
that property.The court should therefore, have set
-a. ayd ihe ex fvr. uoe a- -
it- - '' ta--r- rVrThe i " r'iriaj hae aeart-re- the ':v,.w
OPESKBTO NEW-TO-N STATION!!
Vtek.w-r- si 1. JJewt...Ul.t.-ac- . y.lie Mllea.
rr.. t. --v
UOtl,I A i
l - aa t,a. j. t'nat we tferV - - tm --.' haiM. and wci t r 1
not sufficient evidenee of their executionupon the issue made by the pleading inthis ca.
The next question is, whether the ex-
ecution of these instruments is sufficient-
ly proved by other evidence shown in therecord.
There are no subscribing witnesses tothem, and there is no proof of the signa--
He- Mujliv m tt.e Mu-a- J d parrmw ueeif varru - i u v t, - ihj; ao t:;."- jsjii.--.ir - t n m k- -t a.w . t. an, we are reariy
?t at V ( lo rr'"-- -- i"V fVt 1st. . ireK li. a.r ra J -aside the judgment and ord- -r of sale up-on the attachment below, so far as thebov George i concerned as well aa tlielevy and decreed that tl.e same should be
. - , .. . . i 1.1 .
"i.mre e tai for U.pit rnent. Wfaat
The wa.'- r of th rnam-na- l d"trtJ(V
o" - r ta e. i lark,'l t. a i.reen. IVrrj.- t .ml
h.. a ..il. VavPw. w.'.l prklic ta CO
l-
r tt ij-- i tuv. i nNS AI'V4NK.I N TII Ki BM
iu the time iim.i-- ! y law. or thT w.!ltorevt-- r bnrre.1 : an! ttnaw inder.tr'l to saides.cte are rP'Ti't'l " corae forward aDdmake immtdinte
w. Qrixx,T. II. BEUKY,A ia.iuio:ra'ora.
rrch 1, 11- -
Intoltrnt o(U.irITEREA. tie fatal of .I.jHX WIL- -
LIA'-N- . def-a-a-- d. waby an or.!'r and da-T- e of the
Pro! Court of Newion Count-r- . ittfof Miaa!-:- i li. mad-- at the -t Xorcm-bc-r
term. A- - D ' "v'. of "aid Cotirl : Now.
a .r - enre, o R FFI.'TT iK S
r- - ra a 'o'''effc i
fr e i ; - tr- irtT a -
.
he siOaXii be, .ijfui an 1 timp-- t lAtnurr-- p th-t- r cot .' "A- JsX'la -- O Alal l e a--k. or ftr't ..f Of . , I :.. ! held tor naueni. CUl It Slioum wn ii.'TERMS: a onlo '! t"' at n. and ae tureot Keti'sen i.u. -- u w.y. ... . . , ,K- - --;t,, nt rorrt.For board, tmuoa. wa.fa.ni:. t-- , for j?. n1 o ah ( ri we p r- - rr -- e to i.- -'
proof of the fact of his signing and deliv-eri- r.
the instruments. The testimony of as no such issue could be had or tried, upI rro'-- v n T- - . xpyvt a t.'M- - fi ; rt-n- ; or our a.iiYt n t at -t ( w firm at Quitman. l,U men t.a rnrivnt their interrsts in
haJi iaFr Lat'n. trrnv-h- . or Trraa, -
a.want m tnir ort-- at et- - on a void levy.i l ia..?.. ai - r. a
J : -- ! ' iv r - e m n. hich I the officer who purports to have Ulten" m- aa it to u and we v.A eip this work, at a tiublic meeting inFor I ra r. r. PaaBbtU. WaJt Vor aiw 26.0.'aa4 rsutd --? rvaM..., Ue a K t HEfaRY, Mta.Y OTtKRELUS'i. Rttepmt. Sot. i. !. tf
the ac know led ginents, is not positive asto the fact of execution, showing that hehas no recollection of the fact of execu-tion and acknowledgment, and that he
Wrvrk. f.Aduresa ZF.H C. r.U1 !..anH Propr eTr. V-r- .
SrarArin'.iv! term or u - Mnaay : si.f !
Let the decree be reversed, and decreerendered in this Court, setting aaide andancullin. the levy on the loy George, thejudgment, and order of sale under it. andall the proceedings affecting the boyGeorfl"e bad under said lew and attach- -
If any action would fie for the trover andconversion, it is clear that it could not bemaintained by tbe wife's administratorupon the facts aet forth in this record.
Thejudgment must tlierf.-r- e fie reversed,and the case remanded for a new trial.
HaatiV.
O re, i 11 'W
Hp .UTERT STABLE,BY AC.11 ILLS CO no
-- e m V " m J I
o- i. i an tii I
e a-,- aft-- Ha.wv A of j
v r I err. t A
:" a p m '. a- - t, , "i. rr! i t T .lpf.. j
all sections are to be represented at someearly day, of which due notice is to be
given.4th. Rtjrhrd. That committee of ten
be appointed by-- the chairman to repre-sent the interest of this county, either in
person or by proxv to be selected by him.Thefollowlnir gentleman wereapp-Mnted-
.
William Thame, J. J- - Monrtj. E. v..R tlucit. Wiliiam MatD. A. F. Temple,
Haikis.J". Sc -- . W. HUTCHIN8. ment.- C
of th-- , Inrr;.iin'- - !r tTEI c icrci-
i infers that the execution waa duly ao--1
ktwtwledg-- d by the grantor from the merej fact that his witness' signature to thej acknowledgment is genuine. These cer--!
tifir-a'- e do not state that be knew Keo-- 1
ben Williams, the grantor, and although
t'p
.:t:, . psM- .. Ti i; ! e - - J..- -
tkon .d T' fm tr- N rt.-
K l . : 1 - I iU .wit e' I) , e r t J J ,'r- - wi r,t
T ri n t - rean J ' f nd, a a V rheB K 1 f 4iij Nortli. a4 rrt-- r a.
. k,r - ir
1 Ke . TaH w 't Uiw 4Junw-- o - j r t. a r,s-- 4 iii ti h tr F.ef cer 1 r.'C New Orar.iji. aad azr.te at Vk ktttl-- c ai V . - a- -
A f tVrr. r i ajidt e NP-- til'. pt I 1 1 t."ai lrotaj- - i
Ua I "eitir T ajy x t'Jket f JjaCjL-r'- a. w--.a
hf M fin-; 1w:ir e- iV: eo tJk ihr
"fV1 aree w". Ke d w.h ae $ ar
p.. ? r- - d iWgM rHi a far a tieoi i mt Mte K ad in-- wf -- f f r - wd
;c,Miti f'r ' r;flf - '. H . ; r ar y
'PHI hT?seiit an! wellm rwaaiy w f.rmahw ,f.ti
ail s be noj claim aaidte are hr ! t nmiS.l t j hrtii,jin aa;d
claim uii.y f rof'A!--- i acror,i:n? to law.and have them rciiterei theCir-r-
of tha Proate Court of aid county, at hiotTire in IVo-itur- . wnhm twelve monthfrom the di! hereof, or the me will bebared. WILLIAMmN,
J. C. WILLIAM x.Administrator.
Ic. 1C. 1"'V. m
Girard Brandon et alvs. (03C.
Crorrri-- s I'raUuuaa, Bardwarf,Adam L. Fcngsman J
Tl.ii l, !l - a-- filled by the aprre ro'ad cr'r-- sllants. t ?l
1 v .. ir e i kedto hy a rjrd ir who is at ai! hura u ai-,-o
ra ta T- - freait a : JI be .mites u trt---
it r it .TrT"fi " '"n aw-l- r Tf payint-- at ahoaM 1e' w ,or.f-- r. u-- rT ;-
a. wit. J. 4 G. W . U UTt !Keb -- if
w LlTrry liable at DeSot.
1 tii Iii y,.nlaa cf January. ,4 --
r harrci f J. W. Wi FF HI" ia iM B. in the fm.'. nr"r- - oftwea
Th sca;rti co7il-- l i " lerm. s.ar-ea-fi t.i arcori4. of
HATES OP TVI",,:( Lias oawj.f o t vf
inf anii rtitiii. far mi-nt- ar-- Ota- -
Jl'XIOR rLA InciuJ nt fc. 1
rar.! Arithrutuc, H.torj and C 13
m,ntn- - a. wth A"--
f CXA-S- ti, kM-if- -.
lri''o..r.t a. t'n.miairy. it a, Ac- -
i - -- ii n t "eri! in the Chancery Court of Adams Countyj on the June ls.-,-
It stains, in substance, that on f'th July! ls'rO Phillip Hogtratt obtained a decre
in the Sou: hern l.striet Chancery Courtaeainst Bmguman, James Surget and
! William Biune. for the foreclosure of aN
, .a , ... i r id frwBl, Ifltl, lrr- - OA
- " . U. ii:r art. Jt a1'
. i VVVT . FVAN5.V. F Hk.KX
-. 21--
ii mt n Ins.i the lafe flTii taf
m"f l UUiaraJi U .HI 1 T
t. KaMbal, tl-- n i tt ao.i.h W. M W ; '..FY.trar'-- p rt.v.
TH F od-;rre- d k newL'tri . i oc (i- M . ie
d ',.. a.d w he l.;nwf pr- - ta-- rj ai ail tinui tu taae erw
An Ohio iHumper. while making aspeech recently, paused in tbe midst ofit and exclaimed : "Now gentlemen,what do you think 1" Initlantly, a manrose in the assembly, and with one eyepartially cloned, modestly, with Scotchbrogue, replied : ''I think, sir I do in-
deed, sir I think if you nd I wouldslump the county together, we would tellmore lies than any two men in the county,and I'd not say a word myself during-t- h
whole time !"
An old lady stepped into one of thestores of New Haven the other day, andafter looking for some time at a pile ofwater a lying in the gutter, exclaimed,"Hia, indeed, 'an awful state of ibinirawhen we are obliged to have can noat.iled op ia oar strewts !"
Win. X. Ravnes. William Graham. J. IDansbv. Win. K-- Norman. Jarae Ha le.
ith." HetnJtfd. That the Proceel ng ofthis meeting be publbed in the .n.i.Oman, the .
other papers interested in the pror-oae- d
work.On motion the meetin; adjourned.
M. WAKE,iL II. Wmws, Secretaty.
An American papar announced the ni-n-
of its ed.tor. piouly ad l.ng: "Allgood paring subscribers are reoijested tomention him in their t rsyers ; the others
feo4 ;u-.-
the matter of acknowledgment wss ol re-
cent occurrence, be had no recollection ofthe facts attending it. He does not evenstate that be knew Reuben Williams, batonly that be saw him once, and that wasabout the 15th October, la"4. the timewben the certificate bear date. It ap-
pear to be strange that no proof was ad-
duced of the signature of Reuben Wil-liams, a matter which must be presumedto be readily capable of proof, if the sig-
nature was genuine. The only testimonytending to show that the deed waa execu-ted by 'Williams is that of Washington ;
bat that is not direct to the point of ex-
ecution bu tend to show act of recog-.itin- s
from which execution might be
4. h'f aEr.ner aa--i MTtfair Ml
Aitrayrd.coy f.remiea on Sitorday the lCthLEFT a arnaU l ay hirase. avut e.aht or
nine years old. with a ad Ke mark oneside, a acar on the washer of one eye. anda mall wurt on hi n(t-e- . and a by maremu'e. on the chunkey ordr, roi,ched lat..ring, and mane fmwts until it rt-ar- l lavaover. ArTinforniatKin a''Tthem thank- -fu"T reoeivt-d- . or Id fqi'v rewarded. Mt- - . . -.-- i i t.',
I6TSTEM Of EBIC1TI05,ii ai-- o keep frr h re a fizk lot
I Kntti.; uta a Hark tCVma ra IVtJ Jir t. j. cuix i nf h- - r rtfar I
mortgage executed by P.ingsman to se-
cure certain debt due to Hoggatt andBrune, conveying certain real ana" per-sonal estate It that purpose ; t y whichdecree Surget was appointed a com mis-sion er to make sale of the mortgagedproperty to pay the debt specified, ondefault of thereof bv Bingaman
t l trm TAl'iHT T
laATJD E EEiX E BPHIXa. SCISS
Latin. Grcak and ti Higher t w
BHtctii.EXTRA $5 w
Mai," V. tha monUi. 1
I t of lann, ai!Tuio-- a wtllts.clMrtaMJfr"'" ft-ck-
.
i.f wrrn unia ala-ai- -
d J'na. m ra. T rtiff
.Mm Ht i r.fravl Wan Ua. b.aanl, ra. and t "
at wit tir and at other niac-a- rt Lt a I.vt 1 rat-'m-
PrtaudeJ. O. Jm aaauaaMT,Im. i, U.0.
!i "f o ocr.a- - d ij. v.X
Awtt.r, 1 JSrCOR VJ If K.Ifw n. c, need not, 'as the prayers of the wickedt't.""i:iic if"',i, trintT. M.as.I m, mmtiF. S PENCE S.U an is--- r:a ti.e h4.
II' 10 T ATlO tl r.HTa ac:l.nc!tH "S1. "' '"-- '- "t "i? dm pi.oo. r
' A a..m aiJ - ,s. a,. a rr-a- t ra--r 1 Jj--r: .! ani ioit"c-a.- a. At lnaa, j aiada; Ink tcda. Ac.- - ... at W. 6JIITH.
I
Uf.wTi . Tbl. wUn- -. do, not .pea of ia thirty (fay. from that dat, ; nd to wavail nothing.' aooordicg to good authori- -
tr."
!"i It All utr? ;:: n.-- a ta knr. tv ,..a a, .... a 4 ar. a -- ura :
Lba ta ;. ar i: .ri'
Mar--B , UO. B-.- y
llArch 8, 21-t- ff t - ci ta" A H L HJlI,rpKmirna , lr--M .
a ."
rj f '.';?A. .