Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
T2-P31
Hydroacoustic Observation of the Great 2011 Tohoku EarthquakeSukyoung Yun1, Won Sang Lee1
1. Korea Polar Research Institute [email protected]
The great 2011 Tohoku Earthquake (Mw 9.0) occurred offshore near
the east coast of Honshu, Japan on 11 March 2011, and strong T-waves
generated by the event were recorded by the Hawaii hydroacoustic
array operated by the International Monitoring System. We examine
the back-azimuths of the signals and spectral contents of the T-waves,
and we compare them with the rupture models estimated from previous
seismic studies. The results show that the complex rupture process
probably caused the scattered back-azimuths and several local peaks.
We also analyzed the T-waves of the Mw 7.6 normal-faulting
aftershock. It showed a unique envelope shape and frequency contents
comparing with those of other thrust-faulting events. These differences
would reflect the different source and excitation mechanisms.
Abstract
Tertiary (T) Waves
Seismically generated acoustic waves
propagate within the SOund Fixing
And Ranging (SOFAR) channel.
[Tolstoy and Ewing, 1950]
(1) Little transmission loss
(2) Higher sensitivity
(3) Well defined sound velocity
structure
(4) Slow velocity
(5) T-wave radiator location
Attenuation = r -2
Attenuation = r -1
Figure 1. Schematic illustration showing
excitation and propagation of T-waves. [from
NOAA website]
PMCC methods
(1) Conditions
- Plane wave : long epicentral distance
- Small aperture between sensors
(2) Calculating Procedure
- Correlation of signals in three sensor
- Calculating relative time differences
(Consistency (tcon) must be very close
to zero
- Computing slowness vector (speed &
azimuth)
Figure 2. Cartoon for describing PMCC
method.
Introduction
Results and Discussion
Main Event
Origin Time : March 11, 2011 at 05:46:24 UTC
Location : 38.297°N, 142.372°E, 29 km(depth)
Magnitude : Mw 9.0
Tsunami with a maximum runup height of 37.88 m at Miyako
Foreshock
Origin Time : March 09, 2011 at 02:45:20 UTC
Location : 38.440°N, 142.840°E, 32 km(depth)
Magnitude : Mw 7.3
Thrust-fault Aftershock
Origin Time : March 11, 2011 at 06:15:40 UTC
Location : 36.281°N, 141.111°E, 42 km(depth)
Magnitude : Mw 7.9
Normal-fault Aftershock
Origin Time : March 11, 2011 at 06:25:50 UTC
Location : 38.06°N, 142.59°E, 18 km(depth)
Magnitude : Mw 7.6
Figure 4. Source time function,
describing the rate of moment
release with time after earthquake
origin. [from USGS website]
Times after the rupture
initiation (s)0 40 60 90 115 125
Arrival times (s) 2107 2233 2151 2302 2284 2275
Time lag (s) 0 126 44 195 177 168
The 2011 Tohoku
Earthquake
Figure 3. Focal mechanisms of the main event, a foreshock, and two
aftershocks. The pink line is boundary of plates, and the black triangles are
IMS hydrophone array in Hawaii. The white lines are great circle paths
between the main event and the stations.
Figure 5.
Mainshock
spatio-
temporal slip
distribution
map. Numbers
with colored
stars denote
time after the
rupture
initiation. [Ide
et al., 2011]
Table 1. Arrival times after origin time of the major slips and their time lags at H11N station. They are estiamted from the
spatio-temporal slip distribution [Ide et al., 2011]
Figure 6. hydrophone (H11N1) data
and cross-correlation analysis. From
the top, azimuth, time series of raw
data, MS envelope, and
spectrogram of the main event. The
back-azimuth values of the major
events show scattered pattern,
which is a different feature from
that of the Great Sumatra-Andaman
Earthquake [Tolstoy and
Bohnenstiehl, 2005]. This would be
due to complex slip distribution of
the fault. However, local peaks of
the waves coincide with spatio-
temporal slip distribution estimated
from broadband seismograms [Ide
et al., 2011].
Figure 7. hydrophone (H11N1) data and cross-correlation analysis results. From the left, the foreshock, the thrust-fault
aftershock, and the normal-fault aftershock. The normal-fault aftershock have bigger high-frequency energy than the thrust
fault aftershock even though its magnitude is smaller. This might be caused by difference of source-depth. The thrust-faults
events have sharper peaks than that of the normal-fault event. These features may imply different T-wave excitation
mechanisms.
This work is supported by KOPRI grant PE13050, PN13050.