1
T1883 Detection of High-Grade Dysplasia and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Using Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in Combination with Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization Wytske Westra, Ganapathy A. Prasad, Kevin C. Halling, Shannon M. Brankley, Emily Barr Fritcher, Trynda N. Oberg, Jesse S. Voss, Michael B. Campion, Navtej Buttar, Louis- Michel Wong Kee Song, Lori S. Lutzke, Kelly T. Dunagan, Lynn S. Borkenhagen, Agnieszka M. Rygiel, Kausilia K. Krishnadath, Kenneth K. Wang BACKGROUND: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a premalignant condition of the distal esophagus that predisposes to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Progression of BE to cancer is a process that is characterized by increasing dysplasia grade and accumulation of several genetic abnormalities. Surveillance endoscopy with biopsies is recommended but this is time consuming and not cost-efficient. More importantly, focal areas with HGD still can be missed. Our hypothesis is that histological assessment of visible lesions in combination with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) cytology is superior to the current strategy of random biopsies AIM: The aim of this study was to determine if endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of visible lesions and FISH for assessment of genetic abnormalities is a more sensitive approach to detect HGD/EAC then random biopsies alone. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was done in which EMR and FISH were initially performed, followed by 4-quadrant biopsies every centimetre. Multi-color FISH using a panel of 12 DNA probes for p16, CEP 9, hTERT, APC, CEP Y, Her2Neu, CEP 17, p53, 20q, c-myc, CEP 7 and EGFR was applied to assess cytogenetic abnormalities (gains and losses) in BE brush cytology specimens. FISH was considered positive if 1 marker was abnormal according to previously established cut-off values. RESULTS: A total of 90 cases with a previous diagnosis of HGD were assessed. EMR and biopsies showed EAC/HGD in 60/90 (67 %) and 41/90 (46 %) respectively. Targeted EMR and biopsies agreed on EAC/HGD versus low-grade dysplasia /intestinal metaplasia/squamous in 61/90 (68%) of EMRs. Thus, EMR and biopsy results were discordant in 29/90 (32%) of cases. EMR classified 30/90 (33 %) cases as LGD/IM/squamous, compared to 49/90 (54 %) by biopsies. In 24 of the discordant cases, EAC/HGD was detected by EMR but missed by biopsies. Only five cases with HGD/EAC by biopsy were misclassified by EMR and all were positive by FISH with gain of at least seven probes. Interestingly, FISH was also positive in 10 cases that were not positive by EMR or biopsy. Three of these cases developed HGD/EAC on follow up, two had 9p loss, one had CEP Y loss as their only abnormality. CONCLUSION: This study shows that a combination of targeted EMR and FISH on brush cytology is superior in diagnosing EAC/HGD compared to biopsies per Seattle protocol alone. It also indicates that a positive FISH, especially in the light of a previous diagnosis of HGD has predictive value and cannot be discarded as a false positive result without further follow-up. Further investigation is needed to confirm the results of this study and to determine long term outcome. T1884 Temporal Trends in Patients Newly Diagnosed with Barrett's Esophagus in a Single-Center Cohort, 1997-2007 Patrick S. Yachimski, Rebecca A. Lee, Angela Tramontano, Norman S. Nishioka, Chin Hur Introduction: It is not known whether there have been recent changes in demographic or clinical characteristics among patients newly diagnosed with Barrett's esophagus (BE). Characteristics such as age at diagnosis or body mass index (BMI) could have implications for surveillance and management strategies. The aim of this study was to determine whether there has been a change in age at diagnosis of BE, or shift in other demographic and endoscopic characteristics over the past decade. Methods: The study was performed at a tertiary medical center. An endoscopy database was used to identify all EGDs performed between 1997 and 2007. The cohort was restricted to patients with newly diagnosed BE. Patients with a prior diagnosis of BE, including those referred for staging or therapy of BE, were excluded. For patients who underwent multiple EGDs, only the index EGD was included. Pathology records were reviewed to confirm biopsy findings of intestinal metaplasia (IM). Further data were obtained from the medical record. Results: BE was reported as a finding in 1349 EGDs in the period 1997-2007. Excluding cases of multiple EGDs, cases with prior diagnosis of BE, and cases without biopsy confirmation of IM, the final cohort consisted of 379 subjects. 79% of subjects were male, and 92% were Caucasian. Mean age at diagnosis of BE was 60.6 ± 14.1 yrs, with mean BMI of 27.4 ± 5.2 and mean BE length of 4.7 ± 3.7 cm at diagnosis. Between 1997 and 2007 there was no significant change in mean age at diagnosis (P=0.88 by ANOVA), BMI (P=0.24 by ANOVA), length BE (P=0.57 by ANOVA), or in proportion of men vs women newly diagnosed (P=0.45 by Chi square). Rates of prevalent pathology were as follows: 86% (327/379) had IM alone, 7% (26/379) had biopsies indefinite for dysplasia, 2% (9/379) had low grade dysplasia, 1% (4/379) had high grade dysplasia, 1% (4/379) had intramucosal carcinoma, and 2% (9/379) had invasive adenocarcinoma. In comparing men and women, there was no difference in age at diagnosis (59.9 vs 62.2 yrs, P=0.14), BMI (27.4 vs 27.5, P=0.90), or length of BE (4.8 vs 4.4 cm, P= 0.39), although rates of prevalent dysplasia/cancer were higher in men than women (6% vs 1%, P=0.03). Conclusions: Despite an increase in the number of EGDs performed in an open access endoscopy unit from 1997 - 2007, there was no appreciable change in age at diagnosis of BE. BMI among newly diagnosed patients also remained stable over this time period. Rates of prevalent dysplasia/cancer at diagnosis of BE were low, and particularly uncommon among women. The results of this study may be used to further tailor screening strategies for BE. A-593 AGA Abstracts T1885 Interobserver Variability in the Diagnosis of Crypt Dysplasia in Barrett's Esophagus Dominique Coco, John R. Goldblum, Jason L. Hornick, Gregory Y. Lauwers, Elizabeth A. Montgomery, Amitabh Srivastava, Helen H. Wang, Robert D. Odze Background: Recent clinic and DNA content (by image cytometry) studies suggest that dysplasia developing in Barrett's esophagus (BE) begins in the crypt bases [”crypt dysplasia” (CD)] and extends to the surface epithelium with progression. In some patients, CD is identified in biopsy specimens prior to the development of traditional low or high-grade dysplasia. To date, the diagnostic reproducibility of CD, which is an important step if future biology and natural history studies are to be performed accurately, has not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interobserver reproducibility of diagnosing CD among gastrointestinal pathologists with research interest in BE. Design: Glass slides of 40 routinely processed H&E stained mucosal biopsies of BE and related neoplasms [10 BE without dysplasia, 9 CD, 10 low-grade dysplasia (LGD), 9 high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and 2 intramucosal adenocarcinoma (IMCa) diagnosed by the index pathologist] were selected by two of the investigators (DPC, RDO), and sent to 5 other GI pathologists for a blinded evaluation of the grade of neoplasia. Prior to the slide review, investigators were provided with diagnostic criteria for CD, LGD, and HGD. Analysis was performed by Kappa statistics. Results: The overall Kappa value for interobserver agreement in the entire case cohort was moderate (K=0.44). The degree of agreement was highest for IMCa (K=0.65) and BE without dysplasia (K=0.57) and lowest for LGD (K=0.31). Notably, no significant differences were observed in the degree of reproducibility in the diagnosis of CD (K=0.44) compared to LGD (K=0.31) or HGD (K=0.46). Of the 9 cases of CD, all 6 observers agreed in 22% of the cases with at least 5 observers agreeing in 33% and at least 4 observers agreeing in 78% of the cases. In general, when there was a disagreement with the index pathologist regarding a diagnosis of CD (n=17/45 readings), the majority diagnosed either LGD or HGD rather than BE without dysplasia. Conclusions: The level of agreement for a diagnosis of CD was moderate and similar to that observed for other grades of dysplasia, both in this study and in previous interobserver reproducibility studies in BE. Thus, similar to LGD and HGD, there is sufficient interobserver agreement to perform further biology and natural history studies to elucidate the role of CD in the pathogenesis of cancer in BE. T1886 Effect of Barryx Halo Radiofrequency Ablation Treatment On mRNA Gene Expression in Barrett's Esophagus with Dysplasia Reginald V. N. Lord, Araluen Freeman, Natalia K. Botelho, Antony R. Wettstein, Naser El- Hammuri, Angelique Levert-Mignon, Sarah J. Lord Background: The neosquamous mucosa that replaces Barrett's esophagus (BE) mucosa after endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is endoscopically and microscopically similar to normal squamous epithelium, but whether it has a similar gene expression profile has not been reported. Methods: We compared mRNA expression of 40 genes shown to be differentially expressed in BE in 10 consecutive patients with dysplastic BE (9 LGD, 1 HGD) before and after RFA and in 5 controls individuals without GERD. mRNA expression was measured from formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded endoscopic biopsy tissues from the distal oesophagus using a multiplex tandem PCR method. Post-treatment biopsies were from the neosquamous mucosa replacing BE or from residual BE. Results: Seven of 10 patients had no evidence of BE after RFA with normal squamous esophagus or mild inflammation on biopsy. Islands of IM (2 patients) or LGD (1 patient) remained in the other patients. Expression levels varied widely between subjects for some genes. Expression levels in the neosquamous mucosa were not significantly different to normal esophagus from control patients for any gene (Mann- Whitney test). A mean five-fold or greater decrease after RFA was detected in TERT (telomer- ase), MMP1, TSPAN 1 and 8 and GDF15 - genes known to have increased expression in BE; and a mean five-fold or greater increase was detected in expression of RAR-gamma, SERPINB2, GSTP1 - genes known to be downregulated in BE. Of these, TERT, GDF15, and MMP1 were significantly differentially expressed pre- versus post-treatment (Wilcoxon paired test). The gene expression profile in pre-RFA BE and post-RFA residual BE was not signific- antly different for any gene. Conclusions: The neosquamous mucosa after RFA treatment has a gene expression profile that is significantly different to pre-treatment BE and is more similar to that found in normal squamous mucosa from control individuals without GERD. The residual BE after RFA treatment still has a Barrett's-like expression profile, indicating that all the BE segment should ideally be eradicated. These conclusions are limited by the small patient numbers and wide between-patient variability in expression changes, and patients should remain in surveillance after ablation. T1887 Development of Biomarkers for Non-Endoscopic Screening for Barrett's Esophagus Sudarshan R. Kadri, Madhumita Das, Pierre Lao-Sirieix, Maria O'Donovan, Irene Debiram, Rebecca C. Fitzgerald INTRODUCTION: Screening for Barrett's esophagus (BE) may be key to reducing the number of patients presenting de novo with incurable oesophageal adenocarcinoma. We have developed a non-endoscopic screening test whereby the esophagus is sampled using a sponge contained within a gelatine capsule and the specimen is stained for immunohistoch- emical markers since cytology alone is insufficient to discriminate columnar cells from the gastric cardia and BE. AIMS & METHODS: The aim of the study was to validate a panel of biomarkers to identify the optimal combination for diagnosis of BE. The biomarkers used were alcian blue as a marker of intestinal metaplasia, trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) (Lao-Sirieix, 2008a) and minichromosome maintenance proteins (Mcm) (Lao-Sirieix, 2008b) which had previously been shown to be useful. We compared a number of Mcm antibodies: ProExC (toposisomerase 2 and Mcm2, Tripath, BD Diagnostic), Mcm2 and 7 (Tripath) and an in house Mcm2). Patients with known BE (n=26) and endoscopy confirmed BE negative patients (n=25) were recruited to the study. The samples from patients who swallowed the capsule AGA Abstracts

T1886 Effect of Barryx Halo Radiofrequency Ablation Treatment On mRNA Gene Expression in Barrett's Esophagus with Dysplasia

  • Upload
    sarah-j

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

T1883

Detection of High-Grade Dysplasia and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma UsingEndoscopic Mucosal Resection in Combination with Fluorescence in SituHybridizationWytske Westra, Ganapathy A. Prasad, Kevin C. Halling, Shannon M. Brankley, Emily BarrFritcher, Trynda N. Oberg, Jesse S. Voss, Michael B. Campion, Navtej Buttar, Louis-Michel Wong Kee Song, Lori S. Lutzke, Kelly T. Dunagan, Lynn S. Borkenhagen,Agnieszka M. Rygiel, Kausilia K. Krishnadath, Kenneth K. Wang

BACKGROUND: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a premalignant condition of the distal esophagusthat predisposes to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Progression of BE to cancer is aprocess that is characterized by increasing dysplasia grade and accumulation of severalgenetic abnormalities. Surveillance endoscopy with biopsies is recommended but this is timeconsuming and not cost-efficient. More importantly, focal areas with HGD still can bemissed. Our hypothesis is that histological assessment of visible lesions in combination withfluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) cytology is superior to the current strategy ofrandom biopsies AIM: The aim of this study was to determine if endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR) of visible lesions and FISH for assessment of genetic abnormalities is a more sensitiveapproach to detect HGD/EAC then random biopsies alone. METHODS: A prospective cohortstudy was done in which EMR and FISH were initially performed, followed by 4-quadrantbiopsies every centimetre. Multi-color FISH using a panel of 12 DNA probes for p16, CEP9, hTERT, APC, CEP Y, Her2Neu, CEP 17, p53, 20q, c-myc, CEP 7 and EGFR was appliedto assess cytogenetic abnormalities (gains and losses) in BE brush cytology specimens. FISHwas considered positive if ≥ 1 marker was abnormal according to previously establishedcut-off values. RESULTS: A total of 90 cases with a previous diagnosis of HGD were assessed.EMR and biopsies showed EAC/HGD in 60/90 (67 %) and 41/90 (46 %) respectively.Targeted EMR and biopsies agreed on EAC/HGD versus low-grade dysplasia /intestinalmetaplasia/squamous in 61/90 (68%) of EMRs. Thus, EMR and biopsy results were discordantin 29/90 (32%) of cases. EMR classified 30/90 (33 %) cases as LGD/IM/squamous, comparedto 49/90 (54 %) by biopsies. In 24 of the discordant cases, EAC/HGD was detected by EMRbut missed by biopsies. Only five cases with HGD/EAC by biopsy were misclassified byEMR and all were positive by FISH with gain of at least seven probes. Interestingly, FISHwas also positive in 10 cases that were not positive by EMR or biopsy. Three of these casesdeveloped HGD/EAC on follow up, two had 9p loss, one had CEP Y loss as their onlyabnormality. CONCLUSION: This study shows that a combination of targeted EMR andFISH on brush cytology is superior in diagnosing EAC/HGD compared to biopsies per Seattleprotocol alone. It also indicates that a positive FISH, especially in the light of a previousdiagnosis of HGD has predictive value and cannot be discarded as a false positive resultwithout further follow-up. Further investigation is needed to confirm the results of thisstudy and to determine long term outcome.

T1884

Temporal Trends in Patients Newly Diagnosed with Barrett's Esophagus in aSingle-Center Cohort, 1997-2007Patrick S. Yachimski, Rebecca A. Lee, Angela Tramontano, Norman S. Nishioka, ChinHur

Introduction: It is not known whether there have been recent changes in demographicor clinical characteristics among patients newly diagnosed with Barrett's esophagus (BE).Characteristics such as age at diagnosis or body mass index (BMI) could have implicationsfor surveillance and management strategies. The aim of this study was to determine whetherthere has been a change in age at diagnosis of BE, or shift in other demographic andendoscopic characteristics over the past decade. Methods: The study was performed at atertiary medical center. An endoscopy database was used to identify all EGDs performedbetween 1997 and 2007. The cohort was restricted to patients with newly diagnosed BE.Patients with a prior diagnosis of BE, including those referred for staging or therapy of BE,were excluded. For patients who underwent multiple EGDs, only the index EGD wasincluded. Pathology records were reviewed to confirm biopsy findings of intestinal metaplasia(IM). Further data were obtained from the medical record. Results: BE was reported as afinding in 1349 EGDs in the period 1997-2007. Excluding cases of multiple EGDs, caseswith prior diagnosis of BE, and cases without biopsy confirmation of IM, the final cohortconsisted of 379 subjects. 79% of subjects were male, and 92% were Caucasian. Mean ageat diagnosis of BE was 60.6 ± 14.1 yrs, with mean BMI of 27.4 ± 5.2 and mean BE lengthof 4.7 ± 3.7 cm at diagnosis. Between 1997 and 2007 there was no significant change inmean age at diagnosis (P=0.88 by ANOVA), BMI (P=0.24 by ANOVA), length BE (P=0.57by ANOVA), or in proportion of men vs women newly diagnosed (P=0.45 by Chi square).Rates of prevalent pathology were as follows: 86% (327/379) had IM alone, 7% (26/379)had biopsies indefinite for dysplasia, 2% (9/379) had low grade dysplasia, 1% (4/379) hadhigh grade dysplasia, 1% (4/379) had intramucosal carcinoma, and 2% (9/379) had invasiveadenocarcinoma. In comparing men and women, there was no difference in age at diagnosis(59.9 vs 62.2 yrs, P=0.14), BMI (27.4 vs 27.5, P=0.90), or length of BE (4.8 vs 4.4 cm, P=0.39), although rates of prevalent dysplasia/cancer were higher in men than women (6% vs1%, P=0.03). Conclusions: Despite an increase in the number of EGDs performed in anopen access endoscopy unit from 1997 - 2007, there was no appreciable change in age atdiagnosis of BE. BMI among newly diagnosed patients also remained stable over this timeperiod. Rates of prevalent dysplasia/cancer at diagnosis of BE were low, and particularlyuncommon among women. The results of this study may be used to further tailor screeningstrategies for BE.

A-593 AGA Abstracts

T1885

Interobserver Variability in the Diagnosis of Crypt Dysplasia in Barrett'sEsophagusDominique Coco, John R. Goldblum, Jason L. Hornick, Gregory Y. Lauwers, Elizabeth A.Montgomery, Amitabh Srivastava, Helen H. Wang, Robert D. Odze

Background: Recent clinic and DNA content (by image cytometry) studies suggest thatdysplasia developing in Barrett's esophagus (BE) begins in the crypt bases [”crypt dysplasia”(CD)] and extends to the surface epithelium with progression. In some patients, CD isidentified in biopsy specimens prior to the development of traditional low or high-gradedysplasia. To date, the diagnostic reproducibility of CD, which is an important step if futurebiology and natural history studies are to be performed accurately, has not been evaluated.The aim of this study was to evaluate the interobserver reproducibility of diagnosing CDamong gastrointestinal pathologists with research interest in BE. Design: Glass slides of 40routinely processed H&E stained mucosal biopsies of BE and related neoplasms [10 BEwithout dysplasia, 9 CD, 10 low-grade dysplasia (LGD), 9 high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and2 intramucosal adenocarcinoma (IMCa) diagnosed by the index pathologist] were selectedby two of the investigators (DPC, RDO), and sent to 5 other GI pathologists for a blindedevaluation of the grade of neoplasia. Prior to the slide review, investigators were providedwith diagnostic criteria for CD, LGD, and HGD. Analysis was performed by Kappa statistics.Results: The overall Kappa value for interobserver agreement in the entire case cohort wasmoderate (K=0.44). The degree of agreement was highest for IMCa (K=0.65) and BE withoutdysplasia (K=0.57) and lowest for LGD (K=0.31). Notably, no significant differences wereobserved in the degree of reproducibility in the diagnosis of CD (K=0.44) compared to LGD(K=0.31) or HGD (K=0.46). Of the 9 cases of CD, all 6 observers agreed in 22% of thecases with at least 5 observers agreeing in 33% and at least 4 observers agreeing in 78% ofthe cases. In general, when there was a disagreement with the index pathologist regardinga diagnosis of CD (n=17/45 readings), the majority diagnosed either LGD or HGD ratherthan BE without dysplasia. Conclusions: The level of agreement for a diagnosis of CD wasmoderate and similar to that observed for other grades of dysplasia, both in this study andin previous interobserver reproducibility studies in BE. Thus, similar to LGD and HGD,there is sufficient interobserver agreement to perform further biology and natural historystudies to elucidate the role of CD in the pathogenesis of cancer in BE.

T1886

Effect of Barryx Halo Radiofrequency Ablation Treatment On mRNA GeneExpression in Barrett's Esophagus with DysplasiaReginald V. N. Lord, Araluen Freeman, Natalia K. Botelho, Antony R. Wettstein, Naser El-Hammuri, Angelique Levert-Mignon, Sarah J. Lord

Background: The neosquamous mucosa that replaces Barrett's esophagus (BE) mucosa afterendoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is endoscopically and microscopically similar tonormal squamous epithelium, but whether it has a similar gene expression profile has not beenreported. Methods: We compared mRNA expression of 40 genes shown to be differentiallyexpressed in BE in 10 consecutive patients with dysplastic BE (9 LGD, 1 HGD) before andafter RFA and in 5 controls individuals without GERD. mRNA expression was measuredfrom formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded endoscopic biopsy tissues from the distal oesophagususing a multiplex tandem PCR method. Post-treatment biopsies were from the neosquamousmucosa replacing BE or from residual BE. Results: Seven of 10 patients had no evidence ofBE after RFA with normal squamous esophagus or mild inflammation on biopsy. Islands ofIM (2 patients) or LGD (1 patient) remained in the other patients. Expression levels variedwidely between subjects for some genes. Expression levels in the neosquamous mucosa werenot significantly different to normal esophagus from control patients for any gene (Mann-Whitney test). A mean five-fold or greater decrease after RFA was detected in TERT (telomer-ase), MMP1, TSPAN 1 and 8 and GDF15 - genes known to have increased expression inBE; and a mean five-fold or greater increase was detected in expression of RAR-gamma,SERPINB2, GSTP1 - genes known to be downregulated in BE. Of these, TERT, GDF15, andMMP1were significantly differentially expressed pre- versus post-treatment (Wilcoxon pairedtest). The gene expression profile in pre-RFA BE and post-RFA residual BE was not signific-antly different for any gene. Conclusions: The neosquamous mucosa after RFA treatmenthas a gene expression profile that is significantly different to pre-treatment BE and is moresimilar to that found in normal squamous mucosa from control individuals without GERD.The residual BE after RFA treatment still has a Barrett's-like expression profile, indicatingthat all the BE segment should ideally be eradicated. These conclusions are limited by thesmall patient numbers and wide between-patient variability in expression changes, andpatients should remain in surveillance after ablation.

T1887

Development of Biomarkers for Non-Endoscopic Screening for Barrett'sEsophagusSudarshan R. Kadri, Madhumita Das, Pierre Lao-Sirieix, Maria O'Donovan, IreneDebiram, Rebecca C. Fitzgerald

INTRODUCTION: Screening for Barrett's esophagus (BE) may be key to reducing thenumber of patients presenting de novo with incurable oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Wehave developed a non-endoscopic screening test whereby the esophagus is sampled usinga sponge contained within a gelatine capsule and the specimen is stained for immunohistoch-emical markers since cytology alone is insufficient to discriminate columnar cells from thegastric cardia and BE. AIMS & METHODS: The aim of the study was to validate a panelof biomarkers to identify the optimal combination for diagnosis of BE. The biomarkers usedwere alcian blue as a marker of intestinal metaplasia, trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) (Lao-Sirieix,2008a) and minichromosome maintenance proteins (Mcm) (Lao-Sirieix, 2008b) which hadpreviously been shown to be useful. We compared a number of Mcm antibodies: ProExC(toposisomerase 2 and Mcm2, Tripath, BD Diagnostic), Mcm2 and 7 (Tripath) and an inhouse Mcm2). Patients with known BE (n=26) and endoscopy confirmed BE negative patients(n=25) were recruited to the study. The samples from patients who swallowed the capsule

AG

AA

bst

ract

s