Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
©2011 Waters Corporation 1
T-WaveTM: From innovative technology to purposeful innovation
Ronan O’Malley Senior Manager
MS Product Management
©2011 Waters Corporation 2
Our Mission
Develop a Keen Understanding of our customers’ needs
Work on Purposeful Innovations to solve analytical challenges and remove bottlenecks
Deliver Meaningful Impact to our customers’ businesses and peoples’ lives
©2011 Waters Corporation 3
Tandem Quad and Time of Flight LC/MS & MS/MS
©2011 Waters Corporation 4
ACQUITY UPLC
Our high-performance LC/MS strategy starts with ACQUITY UPLC.
©2011 Waters Corporation 5
Speed, Sensitivity, Resolution
HPLC-MS/MS
%
Time 2.0 2.5 3.0 1.5 0.5 1.0 0
UPLC-MS/MS
©2011 Waters Corporation 7
UPLC – The next Challenge
Urine sample drug metabolite study 2x150mm 1.7µm ACQUITY BEH C18
Chinese Ginseng Extract 2x150mm 1.7µm ACQUITY BEH C18
©2011 Waters Corporation 8
2003 – Introduction of T-Wave
©2011 Waters Corporation 9
Stacked Ring Ion Guides - Waters’ Implementation
RF Voltages - ~ 400 V pk-pk max
RF Frequency – ~ 1 to 3 MHz range
Pressure - <10-4 to 3 mBar
Length - 10 - 25 cm
RF (-)
RF (+) Electrode Spacing 1.5 mm (centre-to-
centre)
Ion Exit
Aperture Diameter 5.0 mm
Electrode Thickness 0.5 mm
Ion Entry
©2011 Waters Corporation 10
T-Wave Potential Energy Surface Pot
x y, z,( )
Radial Position r (mm)
Axial Position z (mm)
Effective Potential V* (V)
15
10
5
0
10
20
30
2 1 0
-1 -2
©2011 Waters Corporation 11
T-Wave Potential Energy Surface
Pot
x y, z,( )
Radial Position r (mm)
Axial Position z (mm)
Effective Potential V* (V)
15
10
5
0
10
20
30
2 1 0
-1 -2
10V Pulse
©2011 Waters Corporation 12
To reduce ion residence time in gas-filled ion guides, facilitating fast switching experiments
— Launched 2003
o Quattro Premier
Travelling Wave Ion Guide
Printed Circuit Boards
Gas In
Ring Electrodes
Ion TransmissionAperture
EndPlate
SidePlate
©2009 Waters Corporation | COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL
Time1.30 1.35 1.40 1.45 1.50 1.55 1.60 1.65 1.70 1.75
%
0
100
1.30 1.35 1.40 1.45 1.50 1.55 1.60 1.65 1.70 1.75
%
0
100
1.30 1.35 1.40 1.45 1.50 1.55 1.60 1.65 1.70 1.75
%
0
100 6727
7275
7492
High MRM Data Acquisition Rates that could keep up with UPLC
Optimal MS/MS performance
no matter how rapidly you need to acquire data – UPLC compatible…
100ms dwell
10ms dwell
1ms dwell
T-Wave Collision Cell
©2011 Waters Corporation 14
ScanWave Mode Ion Accumulation
DC Barrier RF Barrier (m/z dependent)
Storage Region Scanwave
To Scanning Quad
Potential Energy
Low m/z Ion
High m/z Ion
Intermediate m/z Ion
©2011 Waters Corporation 15
ScanWave Mode Ion Transfer
Travelling Wave
Potential Energy
RF Barrier
Low m/z Ion
High m/z Ion
Intermediate m/z Ion
©2011 Waters Corporation 16
ScanWave Mode Ion Transfer
Potential Energy
DC Barrier RF Barrier
Storage Region
Scanwave
Low m/z Ion
High m/z Ion
Intermediate m/z Ion
©2011 Waters Corporation 17
ScanWave Mode Ion Ejection
Travelling Wave
Ion Current
Time
Potential Energy
DC Barrier RF Barrier
Low m/z Ion
High m/z Ion
Intermediate m/z Ion
©2011 Waters Corporation 18
ScanWave Mode Ion Ejection
RF Barrier
Travelling Wave
Ion Current
Time
Potential Energy
DC Barrier
Low m/z Ion
High m/z Ion
Intermediate m/z Ion
©2011 Waters Corporation 19
ScanWave Mode Ion Ejection
RF Barrier
Travelling Wave
Ion Current
Time
Potential Energy
DC Barrier
Low m/z Ion
High m/z Ion
Intermediate m/z Ion
©2011 Waters Corporation 21
ScanWave – High Sensitivity Full Scan MS/MS on a TQ
Time0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00
%
0
100S/N:RMS=60.14
m/z50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650
%0
100195
174
105148
236 397365 448
ScanWave enhanced
Product ion spectrum
UPLC/MS/MS
50fg Reserpine
on column
ScanWave enhanced
Product ion scanning
chromatogram
(m/z 195)
©2011 Waters Corporation 22
Rapid MS to MRM Switching
©2011 Waters Corporation 23
m/z100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
%
0
100
m/z100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
%
0
100253.3
123.0
293.3
397.3441.4
619.6485.5
329.3
214.1
100.1149.3 279.3
251.1
415.3
363.4
546.4468.6
600.7
Time0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40
%
0
100
0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40
%
9
0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40
%
2
Targeted compound MRM positive ESI
Fluticasone in plasma
Matrix Profile MS full scan negative ESI
Matrix Profile MS full scan positive ESI
Plasma matrix Spectral information
Qual
itat
ive
Quan
tita
tive
©2011 Waters Corporation 24
Ele
ctri
c Fi
eld
Diffuse Ion Cloud
Maximising signal
Minimising noise
Wide Ion Tunnel Conjoined to Narrow Ion Tunnel
Off-Axis design
©2011 Waters Corporation 25
Ring Electrodes Opposite phase of RF applied to adjacent plates
Ele
ctri
c Fi
eld
Diffuse Ion Cloud
Ions In
Ions Out
Compact Ion Cloud
15mm
5mm
~11mm
~120mm
High pressure ion guide design Conjoined Ion Guide
©2011 Waters Corporation 28
Ions + Gas From API
Source
Rough Pump
Gas
Ions
Differential Aperture
Conjoined Ion Guides
Ion Trajectories
Additional design benefit : Robustness
©2011 Waters Corporation 29
Conjoined + Second Ion Guide Hardware
©2011 Waters Corporation 30
Conjoined + Second Ion Guide Hardware
T-Wave
©2011 Waters Corporation 31
Time0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40
%
0
100
Time0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40
%
0
Xevo TQ
Xevo TQ-S Enhanced sensitivity 30X increase in peak area 30X increase in signal:noise
An increase in sensitivity? Rel
ativ
e io
n a
bundan
ce
Prostaglandin (Plasma)
UPLC/MRM, ESI -
©2011 Waters Corporation 32
Time0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40
%
0
100
Time0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40
%
0
Xevo TQ
Xevo TQ-S Enhanced sensitivity 129X increase in peak area 25X increase in signal:noise
An increase in sensitivity? Rel
ativ
e io
n a
bundan
ce
Desompressin (Peptide)
UPLC/MRM, ESI +
©2011 Waters Corporation 33
An increase in sensitivity?
Fenuron ESI+ 30 7Metamitron ESI+ 32 15Acephate ESI+ 27 7Chlortoluron ESI+ 27 8Aldicarb ESI+ 27 6Demeton S Methyl ESI+ 26 9Phoxim ESI+ 64 19Kresoxim Methyl ESI+ 64 4Azinphos Methyl ESI+ 42 6Azoxystrobin ESI+ 45 4Dimethoate ESI+ 23 10Acetamiprid ESI+ 30 28Fluticasone ESI+ 30 3Formoterol ESI+ 39 4Nefadazone ESI+ 28 3Desmopressin ESI+ 129 25Salmeterol ESI+ 41 8Alprazolam ESI+ 21 13Reserpine ESI+ 25 5Ibuprofen ESI- 13 16Prostaglandin E2 ESI- 30 37
Mean Difference 38 11
Relative Peak Area
Relative S:N
Compound NameIonisation
Mode
©2011 Waters Corporation 34
At the limit Xevo TQ-S
6 replicates
RSD<20%
Time0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75
%
0
1000.83
Time0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75
%
0
100
UPLC/MRM of Verapamil
(solvent standard) 400 μL/min UPLC
2fg on column
Time0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75
%
0
100
0.83
Solvent
Blank
0.1fg on column
220 Zeptomoles on column
(~130,000 molecules)
©2011 Waters Corporation 35
Time0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25
%
0
100
455 > 165 (Verapamil)2.66e7
0.83
Verapamil, 0.5pg/µL spiked
into supernatant from 2:1 ACN:Plasma protein
precipitation.
10µL injections
ACQUITY BDH 2.1x 50
600µL/min
Plasma injection 1
Plasma injection 2000
Plasma injection 4000
>4000 on column injections
RSD of peak areas < 5%
Assay Robustness –UPLC/MRM ESI + Xevo TQ-S
©2011 Waters Corporation 36
m/z900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700
%
0
100
m/z900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700
%
0
100
1303.2
1234.7
1173.0
1117.2
1066.51233.8 1302.3
1379.8
1310.3
1954.3
1804.01466.0
1387.2
1675.31563.6
2131.8
ESI Positive Ion Sensitivity –Synapt G2-S
24,000 mw Protein
Synapt G2-S
Synapt G2
Synapt G2
m/z1286 1288 1290 1292 1294 1296 1298 1300 1302 1304 1306 1308 1310 1312 1314 1316 1318 1320 1322 1324
%
0
100 1303.2
1302.31310.2
Synapt G2
Synapt G2-S >10X increase
in signal
©2011 Waters Corporation 37
UPLC/MSE
Fragment and Molecular ion Information at UPLC rates for every peak in the Chromatogram
©2011 Waters Corporation 38
m/z100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460
%
0
100Ver0319_002 1179 (8.845) 2: TOF MS ES+
4.15e5
105.0699 177.0913133.0646
165.0916
150.0680
455.2909
303.2072
166.0948
260.1651
185.0778 239.0966261.1644
304.2098
305.2119
456.2942
457.2968
-0.1 mDa
-0.1 mDa
-0.0.mDa
-0.1mDa -0.0 mDa
-0.5mDa
m/z mDa ppm455.2910 -0.10 -0.22303.2073 -0.10 -0.33260.1651 0.00 0.00177.0916 -0.30 -1.69165.0916 0.00 0.00150.0681 -0.10 -0.67105.0704 -0.50 -4.76
UPLC MSE data for verapamil in rat bile , obtained at 10 spectra per second. The excellent exact mass performance combined with MassFragment software allow fragment ions to be assigned structures automatically and compounds to be characterized quickly with high confidence.
UPLC/MSE: Confirm the Identity and Structure of Compounds
©2011 Waters Corporation 39
SYNAPT G2-S Geometry
©2011 Waters Corporation 40
TRIWAVE
©2011 Waters Corporation 41 Drift Time
m/z
Travelling Wave Ion Mobility Separation
©2011 Waters Corporation 46
Maximizing Separation Ion Mobility Separations
Bile Salts
Metabolites
©2011 Waters Corporation 47
IMS Off
IMS On
Drift time-enhanced precursor-product ion association increases specificity
With Drift Time Alignment 35 product ions tentatively
associated with one precursor
86% ↓ in distraction
Increased search specificity
Without Drift Time Alignment 254 product ions tentatively
associated with one precursor
©2011 Waters Corporation 48
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
1D 2D-3 Fraction 2D-5 Fraction
Prot
eins
LC Method
C.elegans: increased protein IDs with increase in peak capacity (LC+IMS)
1D=1ug; 2D(3)=1.5ug; 2D(5)=2.5ug
<2h <4h <6h
MSE
HDMSE
MSE
HDMSE
80%
280%
©2012 Waters Corporation 49
ASAP
Atmospheric pressure Sample Analysis Probe
Direct sample analysis — Fast (<1 minute)
— No sample prep
— No chromatography
— Solids and liquids
©2011 Waters Corporation 50
Scan20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
%
0
10069
75
1,2- dinitrobenzene
Drift Time (Bins)
ASAP ion mobility separation 1,2- and 1,3-dinitrobenzene
O-
O-
OO
N+
N+ O
-
O-
O
O
N+
N+
1,3- dinitrobenzene
©2011 Waters Corporation 51
Unlocking the full power of HDMS ….ASAP analysis of isomers
©2011 Waters Corporation 52
Unlocking the full power of HDMS ….ASAP analysis of isomers
©2011 Waters Corporation 53
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 100040
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
220 270 320 370 420 470 520 570
Driftime plot of crude oil components:
ASAP Analysis of Crude Oil
©2011 Waters Corporation 54
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
220 270 320 370 420 470 520 570
DBE=0DBE=1DBE=6DBE=7DBE=8DBE=9DBE=10DBE=11DBE=12DBE=2DBE=3DBE=4DBE=5
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
220 270 320 370 420 470 520 570
DBE=0
DBE=1
DBE=10
m/z 400.3772 83.66 bins
m/z 400.3767 75.55 bins
-H2
+CH2
ASAP Analysis of Crude Oil
Series characterisation
©2011 Waters Corporation 55
ASAP Analysis of Crude Oil
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
220 270 320 370 420 470 520 570
C13C14C15C16C17C18C19C20C21C22C23C24C25C26C27C28C29C30C31C32C33C34C35C36C37C38C39C40
C22 (DBE 0) 77.38 bins 140.88 Ų
C36 175 Ų
C14 100 Ų
C22 (DBE 10) 62.71 bins 122.80 Ų
Carbon number characterisation
©2011 Waters Corporation 56
Evolution of Travelling Wave Ion Guide Technology
Travelling Wave Collision Cell
Travelling Wave Ion Guide
ScanWave
©2011 Waters Corporation 57
A Clearer Picture of a complex world
©2011 Waters Corporation 58
Acknowledgements
Jérémie Ponthus Maíra Fasciotti Priscila Lalli
Mike McCullagh
Eleanor Riches
…and the MS Research Team
©2011 Waters Corporation 59
Thank You For Your Attention
©2011 Waters Corporation 60
Analysis of Crude Oil SAR Fraction
IFP uses FTICR-MS to analyse crude oils & their fractions
Collaboration: samples provided by IFP and comparative analyses made with FTICR-MS & SYNAPT HDMS
SAR fraction: — Saturated 44.5%
— Aromatics 36.3%
— Resins 16.4%
Sample: from Nigerian Egina oil field — Vacuum residue
— Resins fraction
— Most polar fraction
— Particularly nitrogen-rich oil
Samples: with thanks to Jérémie Ponthus, IFP
©2011 Waters Corporation 61
IFP FTICR-MS Analysis
Typical data treatment: Kendrick plots using their in-house “KendrickInside” software
exact Kendrick mass = IUPAC mass x (14/14.01565)
Kendrick mass defect = (nominal Kendrick mass - exact Kendrick mass)
# C : Alkylation D
oubl
e B
ond
Equ
ival
ent
Aro
mat
icity
• E. Kendrick, Anal. Chem., 1963, 35, 2146-2154 • C.A. Hughey, C.L. Hendrickson, R.P. Rodgers, A.G. Marshall, Anal. Chem., 2001, 73, 4676-4681
©2011 Waters Corporation 63
Waters Analysis of Egina Resins
ASAP ESI
©2011 Waters Corporation 64
Waters Analysis of Egina Resins
Oil fraction mobilogram: an organised area
©2011 Waters Corporation 65
288 -20 N1
302 -20 N1
316 -20 N1
288 -6 N1
302 -6 N1
316 -6 N1
Waters Analysis of Egina Resins
Lines in the mobilogram relate to series in a Kendrick plot
©2011 Waters Corporation 66
Waters Analysis of Egina Resins
Kendrick plot of the Synapt G2 HDMS data
Extraction of a nitrogen containing series (family 1)
©2011 Waters Corporation 67
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 100040
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
220 270 320 370 420 470 520 570
Excel plot of the DriftScope family 1
Waters Analysis of Egina Resins
©2011 Waters Corporation 68
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
220 270 320 370 420 470 520 570
DBE=0DBE=1DBE=6DBE=7DBE=8DBE=9DBE=10DBE=11DBE=12DBE=2DBE=3DBE=4DBE=5
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
220 270 320 370 420 470 520 570
DBE=0
DBE=1
DBE=10
m/z 400.3772 83.66 bins
m/z 400.3767 75.55 bins
-H2
+CH2
Waters Analysis of Egina Resins
Excel plot of the DriftScope family 1: series characterisation
©2011 Waters Corporation 69
Waters Analysis of Egina Resins
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
220 270 320 370 420 470 520 570
C13C14C15C16C17C18C19C20C21C22C23C24C25C26C27C28C29C30C31C32C33C34C35C36C37C38C39C40
C22 (DBE 0) 77.38 bins 140.88 Ų
C36 175 Ų
C14 100 Ų
C22 (DBE 10) 62.71 bins 122.80 Ų
Excel plot of the DriftScope family 1: C number characterisation