12
Systemic Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis for Buildings, Lifeline Network and Infrastructures Safety Gain www.syner-g.eu August 2014 Natural Hazards

Systemic Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis for ... Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis for Buildings, Lifeline Network and Infrastructures Safety Gain ... SYNER-G // Summary

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Systemic Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis

for Buildings, Lifeline Network

and Infrastructures Safety Gain

www.syner-g.eu

August 2014

Natural

Hazards

SYNER-G // Summary

SYNER-G is a European collaborative research project funded by the European Commission

(Seventh Framework Program, Theme 6: Environment) under Grant Agreement no. 244061

with a project duration of 41 months (2009-2013).

SYNER-G developed an innovative methodological framework for the assessment of physical

as well as socio-economic seismic vulnerability at the urban/regional level. The built

environment is modeled according to a detailed taxonomy into its component systems,

grouped into the following categories: buildings, transportation and utility networks, and

critical facilities. Each category may have several types of components. The framework

encompasses in an integrated fashion all aspects in the chain, from regional hazard to

fragility assessment of components to the socioeconomic impacts of an earthquake,

accounting for all relevant uncertainties within an efficient quantitative simulation scheme,

and modeling interactions between the multiple component systems in the taxonomy. The

layout of SYNER-G methodology and software tools is illustrated in Figure 1. The prototype

software developed in SYNER-G provides several tools for pre and post-processing to

estimate seismic losses and to evaluate post seismic needs and priorities (Figure 2).

The SYNER-G methodology and tools have been tested to selected case studies at urban

level: the city of Thessaloniki in Greece and the city of Vienna in Austria, at system level: the

gas system of L’Aquila in Italy, the road network of Calabria region in Southern Italy and the

electric power network of Sicily, as well as in complex infrastructures: a hospital facility in

Italy and the harbor of Thessaloniki, accounting for inter- and intra-dependencies among

infrastructural components and systems.

SYNER-G // Highlights

• > 80 Deliverables*

• 7 Pilot studies

• Software tools*

• 2 Books in Springer editions

• 7 Reference reports*

• 2 Technical workshops

• Final international workshop

* available at: www.syner-g.eu

Figure 1 // Layout of SYNER-G Methodology & Software tools.

Figure 2 // Layout of the SYNER-G platform (EQvis).

SYNER-G // Main achievements

1 Analysis of seismic risk to spatially distributed

and inter-connected systems generates a

new set of requirements from hazard

analysis.

A Monte Carlo hazard simulation is

performed for the generation of ground

motion intensity measures (IMs). From the

seismic hazard model a synthetic set of

earthquakes is simulated, and for each

earthquake a realisation of ground motion

fields (corresponding to each IM required for

the risk analysis) is generated. The spatial

correlation (within each field) and spatial

cross-correlation (between fields of different

IMs) is taken into account.

Site effects and various geotechnical

hazards (liquefaction, fault crossing,

landslide displacements) are also

considered.

The seismic hazard is defined based on the

SHARE EC/FP7 project results.

2

The physical elements are the built

environment while the social elements are

represented by demographic and socio-

economic data. It is essential to compile

inventory databases of elements at risk

and to make a classification on the basis of

pre-defined typology definitions.

Unified and harmonized typology and taxonomy definitions are proposed for the

European physical assets at risk: i) Buildings – reinforced concrete and masonry, ii) Utility

Networks – water, waste water, gas, oil, and electricity, iii) Transportation Networks –

roadways, railways and harbour systems and iv) Critical Facilities – health-care and fire-

fighting facilities. Different remote sensing techniques have been tested and applied to

obtain inventories in specific case studies, together with census data, owner/operators

data, and ground surveys.

3

Fragility curves constitute one of the

key elements of seismic risk

assessment.

A comprehensive review has been

carried out of fragility curves for the

most important elements at risk. New

fragility curves have been developed

where necessary, considering the

distinctive features of European

elements.

A Fragility Function Manager Tool has been developed able to store, visualize, harmonize

and compare a large number of fragility functions sets.

4

A systemic analysis methodology and tool is

developed for Buildings, Water Supply System,

Waste Water Network, Electrical Power

Network, Oil and Gas Networks, Transportation

Network, Health Care System and Harbours.

Each system is specified with: (i) the taxonomy

describing the components within the system,

(ii) the solving algorithms that are used to

evaluate the system’s performance and (iii) the

nature of the interdependencies with

components from other systems.

The Object-Oriented framework,

where the problem is decomposed in a

number of interacting objects, is used

to build the system’s classes.

Performance evaluation functions are

defined in order to assess the response

of the system based on the

functionality of its components.

Interdependencies between systems

are modelled in the SYNER-G

framework in order to assess the

vulnerability of the system of systems.

SYNER-G // Main achievements

5

The innovative methodological

framework developed in SYNER-G allows

the assessment of physical as well as

socio-economic seismic vulnerability and

risk of an infrastructure at the

urban/regional scale. The framework

allows for pre-event performance

assessment for the immediate aftermath

of the event, i.e. with a goal of forecasting

the short-term impact, when the

damaged infrastructure operates in a

state of emergency, in order to prepare

mitigation measures.

Representative results are building damages,

casualties (deaths, injuries, displaced people),

connectivity or flow analysis-based

performance indicators (PI) for networks and

infrastructures and mean annual frequency of

exceedance of the PIs. Distribution of

estimated damages and losses for specific

events is given through thematic maps.

Disaggregation of networks’ performance is

carried out to define the components that are

most correlated to loss of perfomance.

6

Socio-economic losses are assessed including

shelter needs, health impact and

accessibility models. A Multi-criteria Decision

Analysis tool is applied, which provides

decision makers with a dynamic decision-

support platform to capture post-disaster

emergency shelter demand decisions.

Apart from building and utility losses,

building usability, building habitability and

social vulnerability of the affected

population together with socio-economic

indicators (Urban Audit/EUROSTAT) are

considered in the analysis.

SYNER-G // Representative application results

City of Thessaloniki, Greece // The needs for shelters in each sub-city district (0-12) are

classified from “low to high” considering socio-economic, climatic, spatial and temporal

factors in addition to modelled building damage states.

City of Thessaloniki, Greece // The accessibility level of the sub-city districts (0-12) to health

care services is classified from “low to high” considering the damages to roads due to soil

liquefaction, bridge damage due to ground shaking and road blockages due to overpass

bridges and adjacent building collapses.

Shelter Needs Index

(SNI)

0.00 - 0.03 low

0.03 - 0.06

0.06 - 0.19

0.19 - 0.33

0.33 - 0.61 high

SYNER-G // Representative application results

Interaction of water supply (WSS) and electric power network (EPN), Thessaloniki, Greece //

Level of correlation between the damaged WSS and EPN components and the displaced

people. It is observed that the correlation is higher with the EPN substations, which

highlights the importance of the interaction between EPN loss and building habitability.

Gas system in L’Aquila, Italy // Relative frequency of the number of damaged M/R stations

conditional to the Connectivity Loss (CL, left) and Serviceability Ratio (SR, right). The

disaggregation of seismic performance allows identifying the damaged M/R stations that

provide the largest causative contribution to the risk.

Electric power network of Sicily, Italy // Contour map of expected values of Voltage Ratio

(VR), averaged on the whole simulation for each demand node. It can be seen that the

reduction in voltage due to seismically induced damage is less than the tolerated threshold

of 10%, allowing the power demand delivery everywhere in the island.

Harbour of Thessaloniki, Greece // Correlation of damaged cranes to port performance. The

most critical components can be defined in relation with their contribution to the

performance loss of the system. All cranes have medium (40-70%) to high (over 70%) levels

of correlation, indicating their great importance to the functionality of the overall port

system.

SYNER-G // Representative application results

Hospital facility and regional health-care system in Italy // Mean Annual Frequency curves of

normalised casualties (divided in two categories) that are not allocated in hospitals. As an

example, the return period of the event with the 0.1% of the regional population that

cannot receive the (needed) surgical treatment (red curve) is 100 years.

Brigittenau district in the city of Vienna, Austria // Number of buildings collapsed (left) and

yield (middle), and number of injuries (right) for a selected event of M= 5.4.

SYNER-G // Consortium

SYNER-G coordinated the expertise and multidisciplinary skills of 12 European participants,

coming from seven European Member States, together with partners from Norway and

Turkey. The scientific and technological excellence of the project consortium was further

improved by the participation of two highly experienced partners from the U.S. and Japan

with relevant and long standing knowledge on vulnerability and seismic risk management.

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (coordinator), Greece

Vienna Consulting Engineers, Austria

Bureau de Recherches Geologiques et Minieres, France

Commission of the EC - Joint Research Centre, Belgium

Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Norway

University of Pavia, Italy

University of Roma “La Sapienza”, Italy

Middle East Technical University, Turkey

AMRA, University of Naples Federico II, Italy

University of Karlsruhe, Germany

University of Patras, Greece

Willis Group Holdings, United Kingdom

Mid-America Earthquake Center, University of Illinois, USA

Kobe University, Japan

Contact info

Address:

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

Department of Civil Engineering

P.O. Box 424 GR-54124 Thessaloniki - GREECE

Prof Kyriazis Pitilakis (Co-ordinator)

Laboratory of Soil Mechanics, Foundations

and Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

Telephone : +30.2310.995693 / 995728

Fax : +30.2310.995619

E-mail : [email protected]

https://www.syner-g.eu/

SYNER-G was supported by the European Commission

Seventh Framework Program, Theme 6: Environment (Grant agreement no: 244061)

Project Officer

Dr Denis Peter

European Commission, Research Directorate-General

[email protected]