Upload
nguyennhan
View
218
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
FX risk hedging at EADS 1
Reasons for EADS FX risk management policy2
Mismatch between dollar denominated revenues and euro, pounds
denominated cost base (50 % of aircraft’s order)
Significant time lapse between payment commitment and cash receipt
( about 8 years)
Loss of competitiveness (Prime rival is a US-
based manufacturer)
Loss of competitiveness as prime rival (Boeing) is a US-based
manufacturer
Large amount of eligible exposure with highly instable exchange rates have a
dramatic impact on company’s EBIT
1
2
3
4
Reasons for EADS FX risk management policy
Double - pronged approach 3
Double-
pronged
approach
Risk transfer
Risk
mitigation
(natural
hedge)Using off-
shores
Restructuring
Programs
(e.g. Power8)
Hedging with
forward
contracts
Hedging
with
options
Double – pronged approach
4What is the Speed Grid ?
Speed grid is a mechanical hedging approach that is
aimed to determine the weekly amounts of FX forward
contracts to purchase in order to execute EADS’
hedging policy.
What is the Speed Grid ?
5Factors affecting speed of hedging 5
Year to hedgethe further ahead, the less is
hedged per week
Dollar to euro forward
exchange rate,the stronger the forward
exchange rate for the dollar
against the euro, the higher
weekly amounts of forward
contracts that traders had to
purchase and vice versa.
Hedging SpeedThe weekly amounts of FX
forward contracts to
purchase
ResultExecution EADS’ hedging
policy
Factors affecting speed of hedging
6
The pros and cons of Speed Grid
In extreme cases the Speed Grid’s
functioning is not appropriate to EADS’
FX hedging policy.
The pros and cons of Speed Grid
7
At a crossroads
Resetting Speed Grid:
Increasing the amount hedged per week
Hedging with a large single forward contract:
All the eligible exposure will be hedged within a month by
using forward contracts
Using FX options:
EADS Front Office can decide is it worth to be exercised or not
At a crossroads
Current Business EnvironmentCurrent Business Environment
8
Current Business Environment
2
1 1
2
Increase in
Number of
Aircrafts Orders
Drop in Exchange Rate
from $1.20/€ to $1.47/€ two
years later
Growth of Euro
denominated cost base
Growth of delivery years
ahead up to 8 years
Surge in Overall dollar
exposure up to $94.2
billion
Decrease in earnings
Growth of credit
spread volatility risk
Decline in the share
price from € 21.8 to
€15 per share
9
FX Options
Flexibility
Risk mitigation in volatile
market
Elimination of default risk
Gaining counterparty’s
loyalty
Option for reselling
Requirement of
mark-to-market through P&L
Rumors on the market
Forward Contracts
Relatively cheap instrument Strict obligation
Comparison of options and forward contracts
Huge expenses on option premium,
especially in volatile market (2-8% of the
contract)
Comparison of options and forward contracts
Data
10
weekly spot and forward
EURO/USD exchange rates
weekly central strike prices of
EURO/USD options
weekly premiums of
EURO/USD options
The aim of the analysis:
to find out which alternative’s
exchange rate could be the most
beneficial
Source: Bloomberg
Time period
2000 March of 2008
From To
Alternatives EvaluationAlternatives Evaluation
11
PeriodFX exposure,
bln. $
Share in total
FX exposure
Current year 0 0,0%
In 1 year 326 0,7%
In 2 years 661 1,3%
In 3 years 2 531 5,1%
In 4 years 3 264 6,6%
In 5 years 3 930 8,0%
In 6 years 10 445 21,2%
In 7 years 12 050 24,5%
In 8 years 15 960 32,5%
Cumulative 49 167 100%
Alternatives EvaluationAlternatives Evaluation
Source: Company data
Time FX exposure distribution
1 year
2 years
3 years
4 years
5 years
6 years
7 years
8 years
32,5%
24,5%
21,2%
8,0%
6,6%
5,1%
1,3%0,7%
12
Time
period
Period of
hedging
Strike
price
Spot price at
expiration date
FX rate of
conversion
(minimum of
spot and strike
prices)
Option Premium
Final FX rate (sum
of price of FX deal
and option
premium)
1 week
1 year 1,065 0,887 0,887 0,0160 0,903
2 years 1,079 0,895 0,895 0,0162 0,911
3 years 1,098 0,985 0,985 0,0165 1,002
4 years 1,115 1,120 1,115 0,0167 1,132
5 years 1,133 1,227 1,133 0,0170 1,150
6 years 1,151 1,211 1,151 0,0173 1,168
7 years 1,168 1,260 1,168 0,0175 1,186
8 years 1,186 1,353 1,186 0,0178 1,204
The aggregate FX rate (at which all the FX gap was closed, if we start hedging on the 1st week) = 0,903 * 0,7% + 0,911 *
1,3% + 1,002 * 5,1% + 1,132 * 6,6% + 1,150 * 8% + 1,168 * 21,2% + 1,186 * 24,5% + 1,204 * 32,5% = 1,165
Source: Bloomberg, Team Estimates
Alternatives EvaluationAlternatives Evaluation
13Solution
StrategySpeed
Grid
Single
forward
FX
options
No
hedging
Exchange
rate $/€1.149 1.008 1.023 1.355
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
1,6
1,8
120
39
58
77
96
11
513
415
317
219
121
022
924
826
728
630
532
434
336
238
140
041
9
Spot rates
spot
$/€
ratio
Source: Bloomberg
Source: Bloomberg, Team Estimates
weeks
Solution
14Alternative approachesAlternative approaches
Continuous futures
“Double hedge”
“SPOT-swap combo”
It allows to mitigate significant negative movements of FX rate and
to be close to current FX rate. Although, this contract requires
cautious approach to rolling position.
This approach includes two levels of hedging. The first level is a
typical hedge contracts (forwards or options). The second level
allows mitigating risk of volatility.
This approach gives the opportunity to operate in the market for
all hedging time. The technique is to buy foreign currency by
SPOT FX rate.
Counter-party default riskCounter-party default risk
15
Monitoring hedge counterparty risk arising from changes in the market
value of EADS’ derivatives. To mitigate the credit default risk we need to
carefully estimate creditworthiness of the banks we deal with.
Synthetic credit rating modelSynthetic credit rating model
16
Data
334 banks, which had long-
term credit ratings of S&P,
Moody’s or Fitch and whose
financial statements were
disclosed
banks credit ratings
financial statements
The aim of the analysis:
Possibility to determine banks’ credit
ratings in every period of time;
Possibility to determine banks’ credit
ratings of those banks, which do not
have in order to minimize option
premium
Source: Bloomberg
sovereign credit ratings of the countries, in which
banks operated
Sample
17
Credit rating Score
AAA 6
AA 5
A 4
BBB 3
BB 2
B 1
CCC / C 0
Where
w(i) – weight of financial factor i (sum of all the weights is equal to 1)
Factor score(i) –score of financial factor i (varies from 0 to 1)
Synthetic credit rating modelSynthetic credit rating model
18
Tier 1 capital ratio, %
ROA, %Cash / Demand
depositsTotal assets,
bln. $Factor score
<12.51 <0.32 <0.07 <4.7 012.51 - 13.87 0.32 - 0.60 0.07 - 0.21 4.7 - 10.3 0.213.87 - 14.86 0.60 - 0.87 0.21 - 0.39 10.3 - 22.7 0.414.86 - 16.10 0.87 - 1.13 0.39 - 0.61 22.7 - 42.4 0.616.10 - 18.0 1.13 - 1.62 0.61 - 0.98 42.4 - 121.7 0.8
>18.0 >1.62 >0.98 >121.7 1
Factor WeightTier 1 capital ratio 6,2%ROA 26,3%Cash / Demand deposits 25,7%Total assets, bln. $ 41,8%
Synthetic credit rating modelSynthetic credit rating model
Credit risk mitigation: default probabilitiesCredit risk mitigation: default probabilities
19
Credit risk mitigation: limitsCredit risk mitigation: limits
20
Criteria:
PD > 2% -> Lim=0%
PD < 0.5% -> Lim=100%
Lim = 0.5% / PD
Credit risk mitigation: limitsCredit risk mitigation: limits
21
Criteria:
PD > 1% -> Lim=0%
PD < 0.1% -> Lim=100%
Lim = 0.1% / PD
Risk mitigating with downgrade trigger approach 22
Stating Downgrade Trigger Covenant in the Forward
Contract
Bank has an option to
close out the contract at
current market price
EADS has an option to close out
the contract at current market
price
EADS’s credit rating
falls
Bank’s credit
rating falls
Risk mitigating with downgrade trigger approach
Risk mitigating with collateralization approach23
Specifying Forward Exchange Rate and Calculating
Threshold
Subjecting to mark-to-market
Exchange Rate
moves in Bank’s
favor
Exchange Rate
moves in EADS’s
favor
EADS posts
collateral to
equalize a
threshold
EADS refuses to
post collateral
Bank refuses to
post collateral
Bank posts
collateral to
equalize threshold
Bank has an option
to close out the
contract at current
market price
EADS has an option
to close out the
contract at current
market price
Risk mitigating with collateralization approach
Thanks for your attention
24