Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Synthesis of Small Molecule Inhibitors of Protein Kinase D and Botulinum Neurotoxin A1 James Johnson
Wipf Group Topic seminar 9/7/13
1
Synthesis of Small Molecule Inhibitors of Protein Kinase D and How I learned to Love PMB Protecting Groups. James Johnson
Wipf Group Topic seminar 9/7/13
2
Presentation format • Protein Kinase D • Background • The Protein • Synthesis of Targets and Analogs. • Summary
• Botulinum Neurotoxin • Background • The Protein • Synthesis of Targets • Summary
3
Protein Kinases
4
• Protein Kinases (PK) are used in cell signal transducKon by the phosphorylaKon of proteins.
• Popular pharmaceuKcal targets • PK’s involved in cell growth,
proliferaKon, or apoptosis • Gleevec, Sutent, Tykerb, Sprycel,
Tasinga are approved Protein Kinase inhibitors
Protein Kinase D • Protein Kinase D (PKD) is a family of diacylglycerol (DAG)-‐sKmulated serine/threonine kinases.
• Part of superfamily of Ca+2 / calmodulin Kinases (CAMK) and are highly homologous to the myosin light chain kinase.
• Originally classified as a subfamily of the Protein Kinase C family.
• PKD isoforms: PKD1 (PKCµ), PKD2, PKD3 (PKCν)
5
Biochem. J. 2010, 429, 565-‐572 Science 2002, 298, 1912-‐1934
O R2
O
O
OH
R1
OR1 OleoylR2 Palmitoyl
DAG
OH
OH H
OO
HH
HOO
O
O
R
Phorbol ester
PKD
Mol Cancer Res 2011 9:985-‐996
6
7
Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2006, 27 (6), 317-‐323. EMBO reports 2011, 12, 785-‐796
PKD and signaling
HTS IMAP-‐FP Assay
8
• IMAP (Immobilized Metal Affinity PhosphorylaKon)-‐FP or TR-‐FRET.
• Small trivalent NanoparKcles bound to ATP • Non radioacKve. Can be analyzed by FP or TR-‐
FRET • Higher FP with bound pepKde due to
lower anisotropy.
2013 Molecular Devices
Biological Assay • In Vitro Radiometric Kinase Assay • Measures Kinase binding using P32 labeled ATP.
• Cell based: • MTT ((3-‐(4,5-‐dimethylthiazol-‐2-‐yl)-‐2,5-‐diphenyltetrazolium bromide) • Measures cell viability
• WST-‐1 (water soluble tetrazolium) • Measures cell viability
9
Clontech: WST-‐assay,
NN+N NS
N
Br-MTT
NN+N N
I
O2N
NaO3S
SO3Na
WST-1
NN
N
I
O2N
NaO3S
SO3NaHN
WST-1 formazan
Known PKD Inhibitors
(BBA) Reviews on Cancer 2010, 1806 (2), 183-‐192. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:33516-‐33526, ACS Med. Chem. LeH. 2011, 2, 154-‐159.
10
HN
NN
O
Gö 6983PKD1 IC50: 20 uM
N
Me2N
HN
NH
OO
HO
O
NH
O
R2
R4
NZ
O
R1
R3
R5HO
S
NHS
O N
NMeO
S
NHS
O
CID755673IC50:
Rad .18 uMCell 11.8 uM
kb-NB142-70IC50:
Rad .028 uMCell 2.2uM
kmg-NB4-23IC50Rad .12 uMCell 6.8 uM
CNGö 6976PKD1 IC50: 20 nM
N
N
NH
N
H2N
O
NH
BPKDiPKD1 IC50: 1 nM
NHN
NHNHN
O
3,5-diarylpyrazolePKD1 IC50: 2.3 uM
N
N
HN
NH2
HO
NN
CRT0066101PKD1 IC50: 1 nM
MeO
OH
HO
OHResveratrolPKD1 IC50: 200 uM
Synthesis of 1-‐NA-‐PP1
11
N
N
Cl
Cl
O
Cl
N
N
R1
HN NH2
Cl
Cl
NN
R1
2h, -78 °C
Br2
NH
HN
O O
OPOCl3, DMF
100 °C, 2 d57%
NEt3, THF
N
NCl
NHR2
NN
R1
BrR3B(OH)2
Pd2(dba)3Phosphine, Dioxane, 80 °C
N
NCl
NHR2
NN
R1
R310% Pd/C
NH4HCO2, MeOH, rt
N
N
NHR2
NN
R1
R3
H
19 examples23-85%
H2O, reflux
R1 = Me 59%R1 = t-Bu 81%
R2NH2NEt3, THF, rt
R1 = Me, R2= H (81%), Me (91%) R1 = t-Bu, R2= H (98%), Me (90%)
N
NCl
NHR2
NN
R1
R1 = Me, R2= H (40%), Me (88%) R1 = t-Bu, R2= H (84%), Me (71%)
25-35%
N
N
NH2
NN
PLoS ONE 2013, In Press
Analog diversity
12
N N
Cl
Cl Cl
O
N
N
NH
Cl NN
N
N
NH2
Cl NN
N
N
NH2
NN
N
N
NH2
NN
F
N
N
NH2
NN
Cl
N
N
NH2
NN
O
N
N
Cl
NN
Cl
N
N
Cl
Cl NN
N
N
NH
NN
Cl
N
N
NH2
NN
N
N
NH
NN
N
N
NH
NN
O
N
N
NH2
NN
N
N
NH
NN
O
N
N
NH2
NN
O
N
N
NH
NN
N
N
NH
NNN
N
NH
NN
OCF3
N
N
NH
NN
F
N
N
NH2
NN
O
Cl
N
N
NH
Cl NN
O
N
N
NH
Cl NN
N
N
NH
Cl NN
OCF3
N
N
NH
Cl NN
F
1-‐NA-‐PP1 Activity
13
10 100 1000 100000
20
40
60
80
100
PKD2PKD3
PKD1
[1-NA-PP1] nM
% a
ctiv
ity
IC50 = 0.155 µM
IC50 = 0.133 µM IC50 = 0.104 µM
1-‐NA-‐PP1
Cells (PKD2) %Kinase Inhibi8on: IC50 uM
HCT116 0% : 11.5 ± 1.6
RKO 0% : 6.3 ± 0.6
Manuj Tandon PKD acKvity in 1-‐NA-‐PP1 using a radiometric in vitro kinase assay John Schmitz cellular data and acKvity for PKD2 WST-‐1 viability assay
Future goals • New Scaffold Development through homology modeling and in-‐silico ligand screening.
• Produce a potent, isoform specific PKD inhibitor.
14
Presentation format • Protein Kinase D • Background • The Protein • Synthesis of Targets and Analogs. • Summary
• Botulinum Neurotoxin • Background • The Protein • Synthesis of Targets • Summary
15
Botulinium Neurotoxin A1
DOI:10.2210/pdb3bta/pdb
16
Overview • Background • History • IntoxicaKon • Uses
• Protein • MOA
• Previous Inhibitors • Development of inhibitors around pharmacophore • New inhibitors • Synthesis of New Inhibitors
17
Botulinum Neurotoxin • Produced by the spore forming gram-‐posiKve bacteria Clostridium Botulinum.
• Toxicity less than 1 ng/kg in humans is the lethal dose • From a family that contains 7 serotypes A-‐G. • The genus of Clostridium contains several toxic members i.e. C. tetani and C. perfringens.
• Typical symptoms include: • Muscle Weakness • Flaccid Paralysis • Respiratory Failure
18
Mov. Disord. 2004, 19: S2–S6..
History • First discovered by J. Kerner in 1822 as “Sausage Poisoning” or “Faly” Poisoning. Became known as “Kerner’s disease”
• 1895 E. Ermengem isolated and anaerobic rod-‐shaped bacteria gave the name Clostridium Botulinum
• 1944 E. Schantz discovers methods for large scale purificaKon of BoNT/A1
• 1989 BoNT/A first biological toxin to be approved by the FDA as BOTOX
Perspect Biol Med, 1997, 40, 317-‐327 Mov. Disord. 2004, 19: S2–S6..
19
BoNT’s • TherapeuKc: • Botox, Dysport, Myobloc are forms of Botulinum A and B approved by the FDA in 1991
• Must be applied intramuscular • Can be used to treat MS, urinary inconKnence, Chronic Migraine, Upper limb spasKcity, Axillary hyperhidrosis, and Blepharospasm.
• Biological Warfare: • Saddam Hussein produced large quanKKes of the C. Botulinum during Gulf War
• ~300g could kill the enKre populaKon in the United States
hlp://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ Movement Disorders 1997, 12, 1013-‐1018
20
Methods of Intoxication • Food-‐borne • Infant botulism/hidden botulism • Wound botulism • Inadvertent botulism • IntenKonal botulism
21
BoNT/A the Protein • 1296 amino acids long – divided into 3 domains each 50kDa • CatalyKc domain 50kDa Light chain • TranslocaKon domain 50 kDa Heavy chain N-‐terminal domain • Binding domain 50kDa Heavy chain C-‐terminal domain • Stable to pH 3-‐5 • LC and HC linked disulfide bridge
Nat. Struct. Biol. 1998, 5, 898 –902, Trends Biochem. Sci. 2002, 57, 552
22
Protein Binding site • Binding site on LC • Each serotype of BoNT cleaves a SNARE protein • VAMP(vesicle associated membrane protein) 1+2 (synaptobrevins
• BoNT B, D, F, G • SNAP-‐25 (Synaptosomal associated protein-‐25)
• BoNT A, C, E • Syntaxin
• BoNT C
23
Science 2012, 335, 928-‐929
Mechanism of Action
ACS Chem. Biol. 2006, 1, 359-‐369. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2003. 19:493–517
24
Normal Neurotransmiler release. • Acetyl Choline (ACh) is a neurotransmiler
involved in muscle contracKon • Stored in vesicles that upon polarizaKon
move to the membrane SNARE proteins that facilitate exocytosis to the neruomuscular juncKon in the peripheral nervous system.
• SNARE proteins are Soluble N-‐ethylmaleimide-‐sensiKve factor Alachment protein Receptor.
• SNAREs consist of: • SNAPs, Syntaxin, and Vamps
N O
OAcetylcholine
Mechanism of Action
25
ACS Chem. Biol. 2006, 1, 359-‐369.
1) Binding to ganglioside G1b (GD1b, GT1b, and GQ1b)
2) InternalizaKon of toxin receptor complex into the synapKc vesicle
3) AcidificaKon of the synapKc vesicle causes translocaKon domain HN to insert into Membrane
4) TranslocaKon of BoNT LC across membrane
5) ReducKon of disulfide in cytosol 6) Hydrolysis of SNAP 25 – inacKvaKon of snare complex leads to inability for Neuronal exocytosis of acetylcholine
26
Mol. Microbiol.1994, 13, 1 -‐ 8
Hydrolysis of SNAP-‐25 at Gln197-‐Arg198
Adapted from Structure 2008, 16, 1588–1597 JBC 2008, 283, 18883-‐18891
27
Gln197NH
O Arg198
Zn2+Glu 262
His 223His 227
O H
Tyr 366
HO H O
O Glu 224
SNAP 25
Gln197NH
O Arg198
Zn2+Glu 262
His 223His 227
O H
Tyr 366
HO H O
O Glu 224
SNAP 25
Gln197O
O
Zn2+Glu 262
His 223His 227
O H
Tyr 366
OO Glu 224
SNAP 25N
Arg198HHH
1st Gen. Inhibitors of BoNT’s
• InhibiKon of BoNT monitored by HPLC analysis to observe hydrolysis of SNAPKde at residues Gln197 and Arg198. Or FRET screening of large library.
• HPLC assay using SNAP-‐25 (141-‐206) Heterocycles, 2009, 79, 487-‐520 Eur. JOC 2012, 53, 374-‐379
O
NH
OHCl
Cl2,4-Dichlorocinnamic
hydroxamic acid75% inhibition at 20 µM
NH
HN
NH HCl
O
HNNH HCl
NSC 24089875% inhibition at 20 µM
Ki = 10 µM
N
NH
HN
NH2
O
NNH
NSC 35775657% inhibition at 20 µM
NH
N
CN
I
OMe
Benzimidazoleacrylonitrile
IC50 = 7.2 µM
HN
OH
OH
OMe OH
NH
OH
HO
OMeOHMichellamine B62% inhibition at 20 µM
NCl
HN NH
HN
NClQ2-15
60% inhibition at 20 µM
28
Development around Pharmacophore
29
• Molecular docking of pseudo-‐pepKde like mpp-‐RATKML (Ki=331nM) have helped idenKfy key interacKons in the binding site.
• Key components: • Planar linkers • Polar chelaKng funcKon • CaKonic caps
• Recent developments in non-‐metal-‐chelaKng ligands has shown a new hydrophobic binding pocket that can be accessed by different aromaKc linkers
JBC 2007, 282, 5004-‐5014 Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lel. 2009, 19, 5811-‐5813
2nd Gen. Inhibitors of BoNT/A
30
NH
SN
NHNH
N
CWD-02180% inhibition at 20 µM
S
H2N
HN
NH2
NH
Ki = 10.8 µM
NH
N
CN
S S
Non competitive inhibitor of BoNT/AIC50 26 µM
NH
OHN
H2NNH2
N
HN N
Cl
x4 TFA
NH2
NNH
OHN
H2NHN
N
Cl
x4 TFA
Ki = .600 µM
Further Development 3rd Gen.
31
ACS Med. Chem. Lel. 2010, 1, 301-‐305 Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 53, 374-‐379.
HN
O
NH
O
O
HN N
NHN
HN
O
NH
NH
HN
N
NCl
Cl
Ki = .572 µM
HN
O
NH
O
O
HN N
NHN
HN
O
NH
Ki = 8.53 µM
SHN HN
HN
HN
NN
ClCl
Ki = .302 µM
Staudinger Aza Wittig (SAW)
32 Adv. Heterocycl. Chem. 1995, Vol. 64, 159-‐ 249 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5188 – 5240 J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 4299
R1N
NN PR3
R= Alkyl, Aryl
R1NPR3
N2
H2OStaudingerReduction
R1NH2
R LG
OStaudingerLigation
R NH
OR1
O
R3R2
StaudingerAza Wittig
N
R3R2
R1 OPR RR
From hydrazine to triazine
33
N
NHNPMBR
H2NPMBN N3 R
O
OH
O
O
O
H2NHN OH
THF reflux on O
O
N NH OH
63%
1) MsCl Et3N THFrt 20 min
2) NaN3 DMF 50COvernight
89% 2 steps
O
O
N NH N3
PMBBr, K2CO3, NaI
DMF rt 2dO
O
N NPMB N3
70%
O
O
N NPMB N3
NH2NH2 (HCl)2
THF H2O rt 2.5hH2N
PMBN N3
60-80%
NH
PMBN N3
R
O
OH
Coupling R
O
29-89%
N
NH
NPMBR
PR3
MW 180°C35-55%
N
NH
NPMBR 55°C 1hr
TFA N
NH
NHR
78%
Future Goals • Finish the synthesis of both targets.
34
Acknowledgements • Dr. Wipf • Pete Chambers, Sage Bowser • CollaboraKons • Dr. Jane Wang, Dr. Manuj Tandon, and Dr. John Schmitz PKD • Dr. Sina Bavari, Dr. Jonathan Nuss, Dr. James Burnel, and Dr. Rick Gussio BoNT
• Funding: SAIC/NIH • Wipf group past and present
35
PKD1
36
Tetazolium reduction mechanism
37
38