Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ISSN: 2277-3754
ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT)
Volume 3, Issue 9, March 2014
26
Synthesis of Ce0.8Gd0.2O2 (CGO) nano ceramic
powders by citrate-nitrate route of auto-combustion
for low temperature solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC)
applications Y. M. Alyousef*, F.S.Alenazey, M.Ghouse, G.N.Almutairi and A.E.Aldossary
Y.M.Alyousef, email: [email protected], F.S.Alenazey, email: [email protected], M.Ghouse, email: [email protected], G.N.Almutairi, email: [email protected],
A.E. Aldossary, email: [email protected]
Energy Research Institute, King Abdul Aziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) PO.Box.6086, Riyadh 11442, Saudi Arabia
Abstract: In the present investigation, Ce0.8Gd0.2O2 (CGO)
nano powders were prepared by citrate-nitrate route of auto-combustion
with citrate to nitrate ratio 0.30since CeO2 based oxide has high
ionic conductivity; it is used as electrolyte for low temperature
SOFC application. Also the CGO powders are used for inter
layers due to their good electrical properties to enhance the
performance of SOFC cells. The as prepared powder was calcined
at 700oC for 6hrs to remove carboneous residues using Thermolyne
47900 furnace and characterized the powders using SEM / EDS ,
TEM , Particle size analyzer, XRD, DTA and TGA techniques and their
results are presented. The porosimetry analysis depicts that the
surface area the CGO powders was decreased from 70.31m2/g to
38.32 m2/g after calcination ofthe powder at 700
oC/6hrs.From
the by Debye Scherrer equation the average crystallite size of the
powderwas found to be around 13.86 nm for as prepared CGO
powder and around 18.52 nm for calcined powder. TGA studies
indicates that thereis no weight loss after temperature of 750oC
indicating completion of combustion.
Key words: CGO (Gd-doped Cerium Oxide), SOFC, Porosimetry,
CeO2, auto-combustion.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) are prominent candidates of
power generators that covert chemical energy directly and with
high efficiency, into electricity while causing little pollution.
These power generating systems have attracted a considerable
attention because of their environment amity, and fuel flexibility
[1,2]. The current status of the development of a cell unit is
based on yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) solid electrolyte
and electrodes consisting of Sr-doped LaMnO3 (Cathode)
and Ni-YSZ cermet (Anode) [3,4]. Among the cathode
materials reported (La, Sr) MnO3 (LSM) based perovskite,
due to their stability and high electro catalytic activity for
oxygen reduction at high temperatures, are the most
extensively studied and investigated materials for O2
reduction [5-9]. In spite of significant efforts have been put
until now by various researchers, fundamental questions on
the mechanism and kinetics of the O2 reduction reaction and
on the electrode behavior of LSM materials under fuel-cell
operation conditions still remain unsolved.
It is known that by decreasing the operating temperature
reduces both electrolyte conductivity and electrode kinetics
so the cell performance is hindered. In order to reduce the
increase in electrolyte resistance due to lower cell operating
temperature , it is common practice to reduce the electrolyte
(YSZ) thickness [10-13] or using high ionic conducting
electrolyte materials such as doped lanthanum gallate
(LaGaO) [14,15] and Gadolinium doped ceria (CGO)
[16,17]. Higher electrical conductivity of CeO2 material can
be achieved by doping with divalent or trivalent cations such
as ca, Y, La, Gd and Smetc [18]. While Dusasetre and
Kilner [19] reported that when 30wt% Gd0.1Ce0.9O1.95
(GDC) was added to the LSCF the polarization resistance
was decreased by four times, Murry et al [20] discovered
that the addition of 50% Gd0.2Ce0.8O1.9 (GDC) to
La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3(LSCF) produced a factor of about 10
times reduction in polarization resistance. However
performances are depending on the LSCF-GDC composite
cathode sintering and microstructure like grain size and
porosity and compositions [19-22].
It is reported by Leng et al [23] that the development of
LSCF GDC composite cathodes using glycine-nitrate
combustion method for low-temperature solid oxide fuel
cells with thin film GDC electrolyte. The polarization
resistance of pure LSCF cathode sintered at 975oC /2hrs was
1.2 Ωcm2at 600oC.The lowest polarization resistance of
0.17Ωcm2was achieved at 600oC for LSCF-GDC (40%-
60%) composite cathode.Several researchers have attempted
by different techniques [22-26] for preparing CGO materials
for SOFC cathode materials for their attractive electrical
properties. Many researchers have been trying to develop
new solid electrolyte materials with higher ionic
conductivity than YSZ at intermediate temperatures (500-
700oC), and doped ceria materials are promising [27].
The main design requirements for the Electrolyte material
[28] include:
i) Ionically conductive (should be characterized by
oxygen ion transport numbers close to 1
ii) Electronically insulating;
iii) Chemically stable at high temperature; iii) chemically
stable in reducing and oxidizing environments;
iv) Gas tight / free of porosity;
v) Production as a uniformly thin layer (to minimize
Ohmic losses);
ISSN: 2277-3754
ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT)
Volume 3, Issue 9, March 2014
27
vi) Thermal expansion that matches electrodes; vii) Use
inexpensive materials.
In the present investigation, nano crystalline material of
CGO powders for using as inter layers / electrolyte in SOFC
cells were prepared by the auto-ignition technique since it is
a simple and more economical way of making nano powder
sand their characterization was carried out using SEM/EDS,
TEM , XRD, Porosimetry (particle size analyzer) , TGA /
DTA techniques.
II. EXPERIMENTAL
A. Preparation of Powders
The Ce0.8Gd0.2O2 (CGO) nano ceramic powders were
prepared by modified auto-combustion technique [23,29,30]
using Ce(NO3)3 6H2O (BDH),Gd(NO3)39H2O, Citric acid
(BDH)and distilled water. The precursor solution was
prepared by mixing individual aqueous solution of the above
chemicals in a molar ratio of 0.8: 0.2 respectively for CGO.
To the mixed all nitrate solutions, required citric acidwas
added. The citrate / nitrate ratio used in the present
experiments was 0.3. The solution was taken in a Pyrex
glass beaker and heated to evaporate on a hotplate using
magnetic stirrer until a chocolate colored gel was formed.
When the heating was continued further, the gel gets
completely burnt on its own and becomes light and fragile
ash. The ash was calcined at 700oC/6hrs in a Barnstead
Thermolyne 47900 Furnace (USA). Fig. 1 shows the flow
Sheet for the preparation of CGO Powder by auto-ignition
technique.Table 1 shows CGO powder samples prepared.
Fig 1- Flow Sheet for the preparation of Ce0.8Gd0.2O2 Powders
by auto-combustion technique [23, 29].
Table 1-Batches of CGO Powders prepared by auto-combustion
Sample No Cathode Powder
# 133 a # 133 b
Ce0.8Gd0.2O2 (CGO)
CGO: a: As prepared, b: calcined at 700oC/6hrs
B. SEM / EDS Characterization
Small amounts of the samples were spread on adhesive
conductive aluminum tapes attached to sample holders,
coated with thin films of gold and examined by the
Scanning Electron Microscope. The equipment used for
analysis was OXFORD INCA 250 Energy Dispersive X-ray
Analyzer (EDS) installed on Quanta 200 Scanning Electron
Microscope operated at 20KV. TheEnergy Dispersive X-ray
Analyzer (EDS) was used to determine the elemental
compositions at area and spot. Images at higher
magnification were collected on FEI Quanta 3DF SEM.
Imaging was performed in Secondary Electron (SEI) mode
only using an accelerating voltage of 20keV. Also some
CGO samples were also analyzed using another SEM
Machine -SEM / EDAX, NNL 200, Holland.
TEM Characterization
Some CGO samples were analyzed using TEM
Equipment, 200kV, TEM-2100F, JEOL, Japan at high
magnification to study their microstructures.
C. XRD Characterization
(a) A part of the samples were analyzed by X-Ray
Diffractometry (XRD) System, JDX 8030, JEOL Co., and
Japan for phase characterization. The X-ray Diffractometry
with CuKα radiation at 40KV and 35mA was used for phase
analysis with in a diffraction angle 2 theta range 10-70o and
particle size determination from X-ray line broadening
technique using the following Debye Scherrer Equation
[31]:
t = 0.9λ / B Cos Ø
where t = Average crystallite size in nm, λ = the wave
length (0.15418nm) of Cu Kα radiation, B the width (in
radian) of the XRD diffraction peak at half of its maximum
intensity (FWHM) , and Ø the Bragg diffraction angle of the
line, and B is the line width at half peak intensity.
(b) Also, the samples were analyzed XRD with
PANalyticalX'Pert PRO XRD, with Voltage = 40kV and
Current = 40mA using CoKα radiation (λ = the wave length
of 0.1789nm) for comparison.
(c)For comparison to find approximate average particle
size, the following equation was used:
DBET : 6 / (SBET x dth) [32] where DBET is the average
particle size in nm , SBETSurface area in m2/g and dth the
theoretical density of the material in gr/cc. [assuming that
the particles have spherical shape and uniform size]
D. Porosimetry Characterization
1. Particle Size Distribution
Particle size distribution analysis was done using particle
size analyzer Mastersizer 2000 manufactured by Malvern
Cerium nitrate
Gadolinium nitrate
Aqueous Solution
Citric Acid c/n = 0.3
Heating on Hotplate
(SolutionTemp.1000C)
Ash
Calcination of Ce0.8Gd0.2O2 Powders
at 7000C / 6hrs in air
Dried Gel
Gel Formation
ISSN: 2277-3754
ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT)
Volume 3, Issue 9, March 2014
28
Instruments U.K. This instrument works on the bases of
laser diffraction and is equipped with Hydro 2000S liquid
feeder with a capacity of 50 to 120 ml. This feeder has a
built-in ultrasound probe with an inline pump and stirrer.
This instrument is capable to measure particle size
distribution within a range of 0.02 to 2000 μm. The distilled
water was used as dispersant. Sample was added to the
dispersant to have an obscursionlimit in the range of 5-20 %.
The calculation of particle size distribution was done using
Mie theory.The samples were analyzed with and without
using ultrasound probe. This instrument measures the
particle size distribution on the bases of volume of sample
particles.
2. Surface Area, Pore Volume and Pore size measurement
The surface area of samples was measured using
Autosorb-1C instrument manufactured by Quanta Chrome,
USA. Samples were taken in the range of 0.1-0.2 g in a cell
and were degassed at 300oC for 3 hrs to remove any
absorbed material on the surface. Nitrogen gas was used as
adsorbent.
The BJH Method cumulative adsorption has been used to
calculate pore volume cc/gr and pore size in oA. The surface
area (m2/g) of the as prepared powder and after calcinations
at 700oC have been calculated.
3. TGA / DTA Characterization
In order to determine the decomposition behavior of the
CGO samples, around 7-8mg of the samples were loaded in
an alumina crucible and put inside the thermo balance of TG
Machine (Perkin-Elmer Thermal Analysis). The thermal
decomposition behavior was studied up to 800oC that was
raised at a rate of ~10oC per minute. The Thermal
Gravimetric Analysis (TGA) and Differential Thermal
Analysis (DTA) of CGO powders plots are presented.
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A. SEM / EDS and TEM Characterization
Figures 2a–2b show the nano-sized particles observed by
Scanning electron microscopy from the Ce0.8Gd0.2O2 (CGO)
powder samples calcined under oxygen atmosphere at
700oC/6hrs which were prepared by auto combustion
technique using metallic nitrates. The SEM images show the
porous structure and consist of gas cavities. This porosity
resulted from the gases released during the reaction of citric
acid and nitrates. It is noted from the Figures that the
porosity of the calcined powders at 700oC reduced as per
expectation. Figures 2c, and 2d show the EDS patterns of
Ce0.8Gd0.2O2 powders before and after calcination
respectively. The Figures show the presence of Ce, Gd, C, O
peaks. Also analysis of elements present at point 1 and point
2 are given. The residual C element from the citric acid
probably that had not been combusted yet is shown in EDS
in the as prepared powder. However, C content has been
reduced in the calcined powders. By increasing the
calcinations temperature, Carbon content could be further
minimized.The SEM images of CGO powdertaken from
another Machine are shown in Figures 2e-2h. These images
indicate highly porous structure of the nano sized CGO
powders prepared from combustion technique. It is seen big
gas cavities formed in the CGO powder indicating chemical
reaction occurred during combustion.These SEM images are
similar to the others reported [33-35].
Fig 2 a SEM of CGO (As prepared #133a)
Fig 2 b SEM of CGO (Calcined at 700
oC /6hrs -133b)
Fig 2c EDS of CGO (as prepared) sample # 133a
Fig 2 d EDS of CGO (Calcined at 700
oC / 6hrs) sample # 133b
ISSN: 2277-3754
ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT)
Volume 3, Issue 9, March 2014
29
Analysis: as prepared by CGO Powder
Analysis: Calcined CGO Powder
Spectrum C O Ge Ce Gd Total
P1 12 32.31 0 43.28 12.41 100
P1 8.38 27.83 0 50.45 13.33 100
Mean 10.2 30.07 0 46.86 12.87 100
Fig 2e SEM Images of CGO Powder #133a
Fig 2f SEM Images of CGO Powder #133a
Fig 2g SEM Images of CGO Powder #133b
Fig 2h SEM Images of CGO Powder #133b
Figures 3a -3d show the TEM micro-photographs of as
synthesized CGO powders. It is seen that at high
magnification the porous micro-structure appears for CGO
agglomerates. It is clearly seen that the nano-sized CGO
crystals are with uniform size and compact distribution. The
TEM images show the particle sizes are in the range of 10-
50nm.The TEM images seen here are similar to the authors
reported elsewhere [35].
Spectrum C O Ce Gd Total
P1 38.28 27.31 26.7 7.76 100
P2 32.03 31.15 28.5 8.27 100
Mean 35.15 29.23 27.6 8.02 100
ISSN: 2277-3754
ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT)
Volume 3, Issue 9, March 2014
30
Fig 3a TEM Image 120K # 133a
Fig 3bTEM Image 200K # 133a
Fig 3c TEM Image 120K # 133b
Fig 3d TEM Image 200K # 133b
B. XRD Characterization
Figures 4a and 4bshow the XRD patterns with CuKα
radiation for the as prepared powder (#133a) and calcined
powders of Ce0.8Gd0.2O2 at700oC (# 133b) respectively. It is
seen from the Figures that the calcined powder has well
crystalline perovskite phase of Ce0.8Gd0.2O2.These results
are in agreement with other authors reported elsewhere
[27,30,36] forming pure CGO phase. The X-ray line
broadening technique scherrer’s equation was used the size
determination of small crystallites. The values obtained here
may not be true particle size. However it is seen that the
crystallite size were found to be 13.70nm for as prepared
CGO powder and 16.55nm for calcined powder with CuKα
radiation , as shown in Table 2. Table 2 -XRD Data to determine the average crystallite size of
the CGO powders prepared by auto combustion technique
With CuKα Radiation With CoKα Radiation
λ (Co) = 0.15418nm λ (Co) = 0.1789nm
S.no. B Crystallite size,
B Crystallite size,
FWHM t (nm) FWHM t (nm)
133a 0.58 13.7 0.6978 13.3
133b 0.48 16.55 0.4929 18.71
t = 0.9 x λ / B Cos Ø , B= FHHM in o, B =[FWHM x 22/7 ÷ 180 ]=
FWHM x 0.017460
(a) Sample # 133a
(b) Sample #133b
Fig. 4 XRD patterns of Ce0.8 Gd0.2O2 (CGO) Powders prepared by
auto combustion technique ( a ) As prepared CGO Powder (Top) ,
(b) calcined at 700oC/ 6hrs (bottom)- With CuKα Radiation
ISSN: 2277-3754
ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT)
Volume 3, Issue 9, March 2014
31
Figures 5a and 5b show the XRD patterns with CoKα
radiation λ = the wave length (0.17898nm) for the as
prepared powder (#133a) and calcined powders of
Ce0.8Gd0.2O2 at700oC (# 133b) respectively. The crystallite
size were found to be 13.30 nm and 18.71 nm respectively
for as prepared and calcined powders. It is also seen that
there is some shift in the peaks and crystallite size is similar
to the peaks obtained with CuKα radiation. It is observed
that the crystalline size increase for the powder calcined at
700oC is not significant; it is only few nanometers
difference. It is well known that the numbers of factors are
responsible for the nanosize of the resulting powders. The
crystallite size of the as prepared powders depends on the
citrate to nitrate (c/n) ratio during combustion process.
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
2Theta (°)
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Inte
nsity (
counts
)
Sample #133a
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
2Theta (°)
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Inte
nsity (
counts
)
Sample # 133b
Fig. 5 XRD patterns of Ce0.8 Gd0.2O2 (CGO) Powders prepared by
auto combustion technique ( a ) As prepared CGO Powder (Top) ,
(b) calcined at 700oC/ 6hrs (bottom)- With CoKα Radiation.
C. Porosimetry Characterization
Table’s 3-6 show the surface area data, pore volume data,
pore size data and the particle size distribution (with
ultrasound and without ultrasound), average particle of the
prepared and calcined CGO powders as respectively. Table
3 shows that the surface area data of the CGO powders of as
prepared and calcined at 700oC. It is seen that the surface
area for as prepared powder was 70.31m2/gr and 38.32 m2/gr
for calcined powder respectively. The surface area reduced
after calcination due to increase in particle size as per
expectation.It is seen that the approximate average particle
size of the as prepared and calcined CGO powders are 14
nm and 26 nm respectively using the equation [32]. It can
be seen that these values are quite comparable with the
particle size values obtained from XRD data. Table 4shows
the pore volume data of as prepared and calcined CGO
powders using BJH method with adsorption and desorption.
It is seen that the pore volume values for prepared powders
and calcined powders at 700oC are 0.275 cc/gr and 0.143
cc/gr (desorption) respectively. Also, it is depicted that the
pore volume of calcined CGO powder prepared and calcined
powders are 0.218 cc/gr to 0.1012 gr/cc respectively for
adsorption .It is seen that for both the cases the pore volume
values of the calcined CGO powder reduced after
calcination This may due to may be due to sintering taken
place at high temperature (700oC) and subsequently
shrinkage might have occurred. Such observation is in
agreement with the others reported elsewhere [37, 38].
Table 3 -Surface Area Data of Ce0.8 Gd0.2 O2 (CGO) Powders
Sample ID Number
Surface Area (m2/g) Multipoint BET
Average particle size with [DBET = 6/dth x SBET ]
[ 32]
nm
133 a 70.31
12.60
133b 38.32
23.02
DBET = Average particle size, dth = density of CGO (6.8 gr/cc) and
SBET = Surface area, m2/gr
Table 4-Pore Volume Data of Ce0.8Gd0.2O2 Powders [pores with
radius less than 473.3Ao at P/Po = 0.973]
Sample
ID no.
BJH Method
Cumulative
Pore Volume
(cc/g)
133a Adsorption 0.218
Desorption 0.275
133b
Adsorption 0.1012
Desorption 0.1427
Table 5 shows the pore sizedata of the as prepared and
calcined CGO powders with adsorption and desorption
using BJH method.It is seen that the pore size increased for
clacined powders (adsorption) [37,38]. However, for
desorption the pore size is decreased for calcined powders.
Table 6 shows the particle size distribution (volume
weighed mean) of the CGO powders for with and without
ultrasound. It is seen that there is decrease in the average
particle size (volume weighed mean) for the calcined
powders at 700oC for both with ultrasound and without
ultrasound experiment. This may be due to sintering during
calcination. However the reason for this is not well
understood.So this requires further studies using suitable
technique. Table 5-Pore Size Data of Ce0.8Gd 0.2O2Powders
Sample ID no BJH Method Pore Size (°A)
133a Adsorption 14.36
ISSN: 2277-3754
ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT)
Volume 3, Issue 9, March 2014
32
Desorption 19.57
133b Adsorption 16.05
Desorption 10.42
a: as prepared , b: calcined at 700oC/6hrs
Figures 6a and 6b show the particle size distribution for
the as prepared CGO powders for with ultrasound and
without ultrasound respectively from BJH absorption
experiments. It is seen that the particle size distribution is
relatively large with size as small as 0.15 – 1µm and as large
as about 600µm being present for with ultrasound and
without ultrasound respectively. Majority of the particle size
lies in the range of 10-130µm for with ultrasound and 10-
600µm for without ultrasound respectively and the volume
weighted mean (average particle size) of the powder
isapproximately 70.02µm, 45.92µm for without ultrasound
and with ultrasound experiment respectively.
Fig 6a - Particle size distribution of CGO Powder (as prepared) # 133a
[with ultrasound]
Fig 6 b - Particle size distribution of CGO Powder (as
prepared) # 133a [without ultrasound]
Figures 7a and 7b show the particle size distribution for
the calcined CGO powders at 700oC for with ultrasound and
without ultrasound respectively from BJH absorption
experiments. It is also seen that the particle size distribution
is relatively large, with size as small as 0.15 – 1µm and as
large as about 700µm being present for with ultrasound and
without ultrasound respectively. Majority of the particle size
lies in the range of 10-100µm for with ultrasound and 10-
200µm for without ultrasound respectively and the volume
weighted mean( average particle size ) of the powder is
approximately 60.72µm , 40.08µm for without and with
ultrasound experiment respectively for calcined powders.
Fig 7a - Particle size distribution of CGO Powder (Calcined at 700
oC)
# 133b [with ultrasound]
Fig 7b - Particle size distribution of CGO Powder (Calcined at 700
oC)
# 133b [without ultrasound]
It is seen clearly from the Table 6 and Figures 6 and 7
that the ultrasounds might have helped in breaking the large
agglomerates and brought the particle size distribution
narrower. With calcination temperature of 700oC the particle
size (agglomerate size) increases but with the help of the
ultrasounds the aggregates gets fragmented which indicates
the agglomerates are soft which is observed by the
preparation by either sol-gel or combustion synthesis.
Actually with increase in calcination temperature the
agglomerate size should increase and surface area should
decrease thereby.It is observed that evenif there is a chance
ISSN: 2277-3754
ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT)
Volume 3, Issue 9, March 2014
33
of formation a soft agglomerates with higher calcination
temperature, the effect gets nullified after ultrasounds.
Table 6 -Particle Size Distribution of Ce0.8 Gd0.2 O2 (CGO)
Powders
Sample ID no. Volume Weighted Mean ((μm)
With Ultrasound
Without Ultrasound
133a 45.92 70.02
133b 40.08 60.72
D. TGA / DTA Characterization
Figures 8-9 show the Thermo Gravimetric Analysis
(TGA) and Differential Thermal Analysis (DTA) plots for
the gels of CGO in the temperature range of 20-
860oCrespectively for as prepared and calcined powders.
The DTA plot depicts that at low temperature at 25oC and
22oC the removal of physically adsorbed water occurred for
as prepared and calcined CGO powders respectively. The
TGA plot shows that the CGO powders exhibit quite low
total weight losses of 4% and 2.5% respectively for as
prepared and calcined powders respectively when heated up
to 810oC which suggests the occurrence of basically
complete combustion reaction during powder synthesis
CGO phase since mass loss process is stabilized.A drastic
weight lossis observed in the TGA curves between 250-
300oC can be possibly attributed to the decomposition of
metal-citrate complexes.This is confirmed with an weak
exothermic peak occurred at 325oC and 350oC in the DTA
curve for as prepared and calcined powders due to the
combustion of residual carbon of the decomposition of the
CGO dried powders respectively. The TGA data shows that
to obtain pure CGO powder, a calcination temperature
should be around 750oC. The results reported here are in
agreement with other authors reported elsewhere [39-41].
a) As prepared powder
b) Calcined powder at 700oC
Fig 8 DTA Plots of CGO powder
a) As prepared powder
b) Calcined powder at 700oC
Fig 9. TGA Plots of CGO powder
IV. CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions are drawn from the present
investigation:
The Ce0.8Gd0.2O2 (CGO) nano ceramic powders for
cathodes were successfully prepared by auto combustion
technique with c/n ratio of 0.3.
ISSN: 2277-3754
ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT)
Volume 3, Issue 9, March 2014
34
SEM and TEM images indicate that the Particle
size of CGOare in the range of 50-100nm.
XRD patterns show the presence of the perovskite
Ce0.8Gd0.2O2 phases.
Porosimetry analysis shows that the surface area of
CGO powder reduced from ~76 m2/g – 38 m2/g after
calcining at 700oC.
The volume weighed mean (average particle size)
of the CGO powder was approximately 40.07µm and
60.72µm for with and without ultrasound experiment
respectively for calcined powders.
The pore volume of the calcined CGO powders is
reduced.
A TGA plot indicates that there is no significant
weight loss after reaching temperature of 750oC which
indicates the completion of combustion and forming oxide
phase.
FUTURE WORK
It is worth mentioning that it is planned to fabricate NiO-
YSZ layers by tape casting and sinter at appropriate
temperature and cut to the size of single cells (MEAs) of
16mm diax 1.5mm thick and apply LSM and CGO layers as
electrolyte inter layer over NiO-YSZ surface and study their
electrochemical properties with and without CGO inter
layers. The results will be communicated soon.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Author's thanks are due to Mr. Mahmoud Al-Manea, Dr.
Shahreer Ahmad, and Mr. Abdul Jabbar Khan, Technology
Center (TC), Saudi Arabian Basic Industries Corporation
(SABIC), Jubail, Saudi Arabia for providing SEM/EDS and
XRD analysis result of Cathode powder samples. Author's
thanks are due to Dr. Naseem Akhtar of Research Institute
(RI), KFUPM, and Dhahran, Saudi Arabia for providing
Porosimetry analysis of the powders.
Also, Author's thanks are due to Mr. Hussama Zahrani,
Mr.Bassam Aldrwesh and Mr. Mohammad Asiri of Energy
Research Institute, King Abdulaziz City for Science and
Technology (KACST) for their assistance during the
experiments.
Author’s thanks are due to Mr. Abu Hazza of Petroleum
and Petrochemicals Research Institute for providing XRD
patterns for CGO powders. Authors would like to thank
Mr.Raed of AERI for analyzing CGO powders using DTA
and TGA techniques. Authors also thank Engr. Abdul
Rahman and Engr.Abdulazeez Ibrahem Alromaeh of
National Nano Technology Research Center, KACST for
their help for analyzing our samples using SEM / EDAX
and TEM techniques.
REFERENCES [1] S.C.Singhal , K. Kendell, Elsevier, Oxford, UK Editor,
(2003).
[2] T.-L Wen., D.Wang , M. Chen,H.Z.Zhang ,H.Nie,W.Huang, „Material research for planar SOFC stack” Solid State Ionics, 148, (2002), 513-519.
[3] Sakai N, Kawada T, Yokokawa H, Dokia M, Iwata T, "Sinter ability and electrical conductivity of calcium-doped
lanthanum chromites”, Mater. Science., 25 (1990) 4531-4534.
[4] Sakai N, Horita T, Yokokawa H, Dokiya, M, KawadaT, “Oxygen permeation measurement of La1 − xCaxCrO3 − δ by using an electrochemical method”, Solid State Ionics, 86-88, (1996), 1273-1278.
[5] T. Horita, K.Jamaji, M.Ishikawa, N.Sakai, H.Yokokawa, T.Kawada, T. Kato, “Active Sites Imaging for Oxygen Reduction at La0.9Sr0.1MnO3-x/Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia
Interface by Secondary-Ion Mass Spectrometry”, J. Electrochem. Soc. 145 (9) (1998) 3196-3202.
[6] J.Mizusaki, H.Tagawa, K.Naraya, T.Sasamoto, “Electronic conductivity, Seebeck coefficient, defect and electronic structure of nonstoichiometric La1−xSrxMnO3
”, Solid State
Ionics, 132, (2000) 167.
[7] S.P.Jiang, Issues on development of (La, Sr) MnO3“cathode for solidoxide fuel cells”, Journal of Power Sources 124 (2003) 390-402.
[8] S.P.Jiang, J.G.Love, J.P.Zhang, M.Hoang, Y. Ramaprakash, A.E.Hughes, S.P.S. Badwal, “The electrochemical performance of LSM/zirconia–yttria interface as a function of a-site non-stoichiometry and cathodic current treatment”, Solid State Ionics, 121, (1999) 1.
[9] P. Decorse,G. Caboche,L.-C.Dufour,“A comparative study of the surface and bulk properties of lanthanum-strontium-manganese oxides La1−xSrxMnO3±δ as a function of Sr-
content, oxygen potential and temperature”,Solid State Ionics, 117, (1991) 161.
[10] D. Souzas, S.J.Visco, L.C.D.Jonghe, “Reduced-temperature solid oxide fuel cell based on YSZ thin-film electrolyte”,J. Elecrtochem soc. 144 (1997) L35-37.
[11] BCH.Steele, “Appraisal of Ce1−yGdyO2−y/2 electrolytes for IT-SOFC operation at 500°C”, Solid State Ionics, 129, (2000) 95.
[12] H. Moon, S.D.Kim, H.S.Hyun, “Development of IT-SOFC
unit cell with anode-supported thin electrolyte via tape casting and co-firing”, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33, 1758-68.
[13] Y.J.Leng, S.H.Chan, K.A.Khor, S.Jiang,“Performance evaluation of anode-supported solid oxide fuel cells with thin film YSZ electrolyte” ,Int. J. Hydrogen Energy,2004, 29, 1025-33.
[14] Ishihara T, Shibayama T, Honda M, Nishiguchi H, Takita Y,“Intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells using
LaGaO3 electrolyte II. Improvement of oxide ion conductivity and power density by doping Fe for Ga site of La GaO3
”, J. Elecrtochem Soc. 147 (2000) 1332-7.
[15] J.W.Yan, H.Matsumoto, M.Enoki, T.Ishihara, “High power SOFC using La 0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8 Mg 0.2 O3-ᵟ / Ce0.8 Sm0.2 O2 -ᵟ
composite film”. Electrochem Solid State Lett.2005, 8, A389-91.
[16] C. Xia, M.Liu. “Low-temperature SOFCs based on Gd0.1Ce0.9O1.95 fabricated by dry pressing”, Solid State Ionics,
2001, 144,249-55.
ISSN: 2277-3754
ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT)
Volume 3, Issue 9, March 2014
35
[17] Y.J.Leng, S.H.Chann, S.P.Jiang, K.A.Khor, “Low temperature SOFC with thin film GDC electrolyte prepared in situ by solid –state reaction, Solid State Ionics “,2004, 170, 9-15.
[18] A.Hara, Y Hirata, N Sameshima, T.Matsunga, T. Horita, J. of the Ceramic Society of Japan, 116 (2008) 291.
[19] V.Dusastre , J. A. Kilner,“Optimization of composite cathodes for intermediate temperature SOFC applications “, Solid State Ionics, 126, (1999) 163-74.
[20] E.P.Murry, M.J.Sever, S.A.Barnett, “Electrochemical performance of (La, Sr)(Co Fe)O3– (Ce,Gd)O3composite cathodes“
,Solid State Ionics, 148, (2002)27-34.
[21] Q.L.Liu, K.A.Khor, S.H.Chan, “Optimization of LSCF-GDC composite cathodes for thin film GDC electrolyte solid oxide
fuel cells”, In: K.A. Khor KA, R.V. Ramanujan, C.P. Ooi, J. Zhao, editors. Proceedings of the third international conference on Materials Proceedings for properties and performance (MP3), East Asia: Institute of Materials, 2004, p 657-666.
[22] F.Qiang, K.N.Sun, N.Q.Zhang, X.D.Zhu, S.R. Le , D.R.Zhou,“Characterization of electrical properties of GDC doped A-siter deficient LSCF based composite cathode using impedance spectroscopy”, Journal of Power Sources 168
(2007) 338-45.
[23] Y.Leng, S.H.ChanLiu Q, “Development of LSCF-GDC composite cathodesfor low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells with thin film GDC electrolyte”, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 33 (2008) 3808-3817.
[24] D.Mantzavinos, A. Hartly, I .S.Metcalfe, M. Sahibzada,”Oxygen stoichiometries in La1-xSrxCo1-y FeyO3-
δPerovskites at reduced oxygen partial pressures”, Solid State
Ionics,134,(2000),103-109.
[25] N.Grunbaum, L.Dessemond,J.Fouletier, F.Prado, A.Caneiro, “Electrode reaction of Sr1-x Lax Co 0.8 Fe 0.2 O3 − δwith x=0.1 and 0.6 on Ce0.9Gd0.1 O 1.95 at 600≤T≤800oC”, Solid State Ionics, 177,(2006), 907-913.
[26] S.Wang, M.Katsuki, M.Dokiya, T.Hashimoto, “High temperature properties of La 0.6 Sr0.4 Co0.8 Fe0.2O3- δ(LSCF) phase structure and electrical conductivity”, Solid State
Ionics, 159,(2003), 71-78.
[27] H.Inaba, H.Tagawa, “Ceria based solid electrolytes”, Solid State Ionics, 83 (1-2) ,(1996), 1-16.
[28] K.C.Wincewicz., J. S Cooper, “Taxonomies of SOFC material and manufacturing alternatives”, Journal of Power Sources 140 (2005) 280-96.
[29] A. Dutta, S. Patra, V.Bedekar, A.K.Tyagi, R.N.Basu, Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology , 9, 5, (2009), 3075-83.
[30] A.Dutta, A. Kumar, R.N.Basu, “Enhanced electrical conductivity in Ce0.79Gd0.2Co 0.01O2 - ᵟfor low temperature solid oxide fuel cell applications”, Electro. Communi. 11, (2009), 699-701.
[31] B. D.Cullity, 2ndEdn Addison-Wesly publication Co.Inc, Reading, Massachustts, USA, (1978), p.102.
[32] J. Zhang and L. Gao, J. Solid State Chemi., 177 (2004) 1425.
[33] Y. Dong, S.Hampshire, B.Lin, Y. Ling, X. Zhang, “High sintering activity Cu-Gd co-doped CeO2electrolyte for solid
oxide fuel cells”, Journal of Power Sources,195(2010) 6510-6515.
[34] P.Kalar, A.P.Singh, A. Kumar, Structural properties of NiO-CGO composite precursor prepared via combustion synthesis route, Asian J. of Chem. , Vol. 21, No.10 (2009), S 157-161.
[35] Y. Dong, S. Hampshire, J. Zhou, G.Meng, “Synthesis and sintering of Gd -doped CeO2 electrolyte with and without 1 at
% Cuo doping for solid oxide fuel cells applications”, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 36(2011) 5054-5066.
[36] http://www.sofc.com.cn/cgo.html.
[37] M.Ghouse, Y.M.Alyousef, A. Al Musa, M.F.Alotaibi, Preparation of LSCF nanoceramic cathode powders for solid oxide fuel cell application, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy,35(2010) 9411-9419.
[38] K.J. Antony, B.Viswanathan, “Effect of surface area, pore
volume, and particle size of P25 Titania on the phase transformation of anatase to rutile”, Indian Journal of Chemistry, 48A, 10,(2009), 1378-82.
[39] K.Singh, S.A. Acharta and S.S. Bhoga,“Glycine-nitrate combustion synthesis and properties of nano-sized Ce1-xGdx O
2-ᵟsolid solution for s for solid oxide fuel cell viewpoint”, Indian Journal of Engineering & Materials Sciences, Vol. 13, December 2006,525-530.
[40] M. K. Rath, Byung-Hyun Choi, Ki-Tae Lee, “Synthesis and
Characterization of morphologically tailored NiO-Ce0.8Gd 0.2 O 2-ᵟ anode materials for solid oxide fuel cells: A micro-emulsion followed by solvothermal approach”, Ceramic International, 39(2013), 8467-8473.
[41] P.Muralidharan, S. H. Jo, and D.K.Kim, “Electrical conductivity of sub micrometer Gadolinium-Doped Ceria sintered at 1000oC using Precipitation-synthesized Nanocrystalline powders”, J.Am.Ceram.Soc.,91 [10] , 2008,
3267-3274.
ISSN: 2277-3754
ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT)
Volume 3, Issue 9, March 2014
36
AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY
Prof. Yousef M. Alyousef received his Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical
Engineering from King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in 1995,
and his MS in Nuclear Engineering at Purdue University, West Lafayette,
USA in 2000 and his Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering at Carnegie
Mellon University, Pennsylvania, USA in 2004. He is Professor and
Director of Energy Research Institute at King Abdul-Aziz City for Science
and Technology (KACST), Riyadh. His research interest is mainly
focusing on the areas of renewable energy, Fuel Cell and Energy Efficiency
Prof. Alyousef has published several Technical Papers in the International
Journals and presented several papers in the International Conferences. He
has about 25 technical papers to his credit.
Dr. Feraih Alenazey is an Assistant Research Professor at Energy
Research Institute, KACST, and Riyadh Saudi Arabia. He received his PhD
degree in Chemical Engineering from UNSW, Australia, in 2011. He has
about 10 technical papers published in National and International Journals
and presented in international Conferences. He is working in the field of
hydrogen production, fuel cells and catalysis.
Dr. Mohammad Ghouse received his Doctorate degree (PhD) in
Metallurgical Engineering (1980) from the Indian Institute of Technology
(IIT) Madras, Chennai, India. He has a Master’s degree (M.Tech) in
Materials Science and Technology (1975), a Bachelor’s degree (B.Tech) in
Chemical Engineering (1972), from the University College of Technology,
Osmania University, and Hyderabad, India. Dr. Ghouse worked in the
Corporate R&D division of Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL),
Hyderabad, India from 1980-1989 holding different positions. Dr. Ghouse
was a recipient of prestigious NRDC (National Research and Development
Corporation) Award with cash and a Citation in 1991 by the Government of
India, New Delhi, India.
Dr. Ghouse has served as an Assistant Professor during 1989-1990 in the
Department of Chemical Engineering, King Saud University (KSU),
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, worked as a Scientific Specialist during 1991-1993
at Solar Programs, King Abdulaziz city for Science and Technology
(KACST), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. He was promoted to an Associate
Research Professor in 1994 and as Research Professor in 2000 at Energy
Research Institute, KACST, Riyadh. He was actively involved in the
development of Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cells (PAFC), Proton Exchange
Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFC) and Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFC) since
1991.
Prof. M.Ghouse has published several technical papers in the National and
in the reputed International Journals and presented in National and
International Conferences. He has 50 technical papers and a patent to his
credit. He has supervised PhD thesis on Fuel Cells and Materials Science
and guided several MS and BS Projects.
Prof. M. Ghouse was an active member (1976-2000) and is a Life Member
(since 2000) of the Society for Advance-ment of Electrochemical Science
and Technology (SAEST), Karaikudi, Tamil Nadu, India, and International
Association for Hydrogen Energy, USA (since 1995).He reviews regularly
the technical papers published in the International Journal of Hydrogen
Energy , Journal of Energy, Journal of Energy Conversion and
Management.
Prof. Ghouse is the Editorial Board Member of World Journal of
Engineering since 2009. He chaired several National and International
Conferences. The biography Prof. M .Ghouse was published in Madison’s
Who’s Who 2010 (USA), and in International WHO'S WHO of
Professional 2010, 2012, (USA), and Marquis WHO’S WHO in the World
for the 15th (1998), 16th (1999),18
th (2001) Edns (USA), and Who’s Who in
Science & Engineering(USA), 2002.
His main areas of interest include: Hydrogen Energy, Fuel Cells (PAFC,
PEMFC and SOFC), Materials Science and Technology, Corrosion, Electro
Metallurgy.
Dr. Ghzzai Almutairi is an Assistant Research professor, Energy Research
Institute, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST). Dr.
Almutairi received his PhD degree in Chemical Engineering in 2013 at
Centre for Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Research, School of Chemical
Engineering, University of Birmingham, UK. His dissertation work was on
Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC), and his M.S and B.S. degrees in Chemical
Engineering from King Saud University at Riyadh.
Dr. Almutairi has been working on both Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel
Cell (PEMFC) and SOFC for the last 10 years at the Energy Research
Institute. He was actively working in the fabrication of SOFC and PEMFC
electrodes and their physical and electrochemical evaluations. He has
published about 10 technical papers in reputed International journals and
presented several papers in conferences.
His main interest is in the development of electrode materials for solid
oxide fuel cells and Lithium-Ion Battery applications.
Engr. Abdul Rahman E Aldossary received his BS degree in Chemical
Engineering from the King Saudi University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia in
2006. He is actively working in the preparation nanoceramic powders used
for SOFC application and testing of SOFC mono cells.