42
plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120

Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

synaptic plasticity

Basic Neuroscience NBL 120

Page 2: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

classical conditioning

CS (neutral)- no response

US- UR

After pairing:CS- CR

Page 3: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

ability to learn the relationship between different stimuli / events so that we can make reasonable predictions if we are faced with a certain situation

learning & memory => goodaddiction => bad

associative learning

Page 4: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

learning & memory in taxi drivers

PET study during recall of London route

(Maguire et al, 1997)

Page 5: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

place cells

some pyramidal cells in the hippocampus have preferred spatial orientations fire in bursts

(O’Keefe & Dostrovsky, 1971)

Page 6: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

muscle

motor neuron

pre

post

control

muscle

motor neuron

nmj

how is a synapse plastic?

synapses “remember” previous activity short-term, e.g. post-tetanic potentiation at the nmj

time

Page 7: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

Hebbian learning

longer term plasticityHebbian learning

Hebb (1949) hypothesized that “ if one neuron frequently takes part in exciting another, some growth process or metabolic change takes place in one or both cells and the strength of their connection increases ”

Page 8: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR
Page 9: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

Johnson & Wu (1995)

hippocampal “integrated circuit”

Page 10: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

in reality…..

before after

ampl

itude

time (hrs)

first demonstration of LTP

high-frequency train

rapid induction lasts weeks in vivo

Bliss & Lomo (1973)

Page 11: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

properties of LTP

Page 12: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

cellular mechanisms underlying LTP

inductionmaintenance

Page 13: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

excitatory synaptic transmission

NMDA vs non-NMDA synaptic transmission

AP5

AP5

control

Page 14: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

LTP depends specifically on NMDA receptor activation

AP5 prevents high frequency-induced LTP

(Collingridge et al, 1983)

Page 15: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

what is special about NMDA receptors?voltage-gated channels: voltageligand-gated channels: transmitterNMDA receptors: both

+ - +

+++

- - -

out

in

Mg+

Mg+

Page 16: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

NMDA receptor: a molecular switch

co-incidence detector requires both presynaptic

activity (glutamate) and postsynaptic depolarization (relieve Mg block) satisfies Hebbian co-incidence rules explains LTP properties:

specificity associativity / co-operativity spatial/temporal requirements

Page 17: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

how does the NMDA receptor cause a change in synaptic strength?

Page 18: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

synaptic transmission is unreliable

increased transmitter releasealtered or new receptorsnew synapses

Page 19: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

NMDA receptors, hippocampus and LTP learning and memory

Page 20: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

NMDA receptor-dependent learning

spatial memory task visual task

“Morris” water maze

Morris et al (1990)

Page 21: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

LTP and learning

saturation of LTP prevents learning a new spatial task

new learning can occur after LTP decay

LTP decay

Castro et al (1989)

Page 22: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

a natural LTP? animals raised in a complex environment show

enhanced synaptic responses in the hippocampus

Sharp et al (1985)

Page 23: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

hippocampus= temporary memory storage

new patterns stored rapidly and transientlygradual transfer to neocortexlong-term storage with reduced interference

Page 24: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

diffuse storage in cortex?

computational theoriesMarr (1970’s)sensory input to neocortex

stored by association repetition - association partial pattern recall

Page 25: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR
Page 26: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

compulsive use / abuse of a drug despite adverse consequences

addiction - definition

Page 27: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

recollections of an addict:recollections of an addict:

Page 28: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

Skinner-boxlever-press > rewardrate reward

electrical self-stimulation

Page 29: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR
Page 30: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR
Page 31: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR
Page 32: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR
Page 33: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR
Page 34: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

“a hungry animal often ignored available food in favor of the pleasure of stimulating itself electrically .... 2000 times per hour for 24 consecutive hours”

(Olds 1956)

“pleasure centers”

Page 35: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

where are the pleasure centers?

medial forebrain bundle VTA - Nucleus Accumbens (after Koob 1992)

Page 36: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

dopamine

Page 37: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

DA neurons and reward

(Schultz et al, 1993)

Page 38: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

drug abuse is a form of associative learning

associated cues could trigger “craving” nicotine is continuously

paired with taste and smell of cigarettes

heroin or other drug use may be associated with a specific setting

evidence………….

Page 39: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

VTA DA response becomes associated with the sound cue i.e. DA response predicts reward

learning

predicting reward

Page 40: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

displacement of [11C]raclopride binding by DA release

“craving”PET scan

(Volkow et al, 1997)

MP = methylphenidate “RITALIN”

what happens to DA in addicts?

Page 41: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

associations - summary

synaptic plasticity hippocampus / cortex NMDA receptor - coincidence detector Mg2+ & Ca2+

addiction midbrain - VTA / Nucleus Accumbens Dopamine predictive cues

Page 42: Synaptic plasticity Basic Neuroscience NBL 120. classical conditioning CS (neutral) - no response US - UR After pairing: CS - CR

(from McNaughton & Morris, 1987)

in theory…..