SAN BEDA COLLEGECOLLEGE OF LAWMendiola, Manila

SYLLABUS IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

BY:

Atty. Plaridel J. Bohol IIProfessor

COURSE DESCRIPTION:

The study of criminal procedure would involve a working knowledge in Criminal Law, Civil Law and Constitutional Law. In revisiting criminal law, it would be helpful to brush up with its characteristics of GENERALITY, TERRITORIALITY and PROSPECTIVITY, the rule on COMPLEX CRIMES and DOUBLE JEOPARDY as well as PREJUDICIAL QUESTION and INDEPENDENT CIVIL ACTIONS in civil law.

In Constitutional Law, it is necessary to take a more serious look at the BILL OF RIGHTS, particularly on THE RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED on TRIAL, CUSTODIAL INVESTIGATION vis-à-vis Article 125 of the Revised Penal Code and on UNREASONABLE SEARCHES AND SEIZURES.

The subject matters of this Revised Rules on Criminal Procedure are divided into 18 rules from Rule 110 up to Rule 127 that took effect on December 1, 2001. – The suggested code for easy recall would be: PPP-ABRAM-PTJ-NA-PPP-SP, which is spelled out as follows:

Rule 110- Prosecution of Offenses;Rule 111- Prosecution of Civil Actions;Rule 112- Preliminary Investigation;Rule 113- Arrest;Rule 114- Bail;Rule 115- Rights of the Accused;Rule 116- Arraignment and Plea;Rule 117- Motion to Quash;Rule 118- Pre-trial;Rule 119- Trial;Rule 120- Judgment;Rule 121- New trial or Reconsideration;Rule 122- Appeal;Rule 123- Procedure in Municipal Courts;Rule 124- Procedure in the Court of Appeals;Rule 125- Procedure in the Supreme Court;Rule 126- Search and seizure;Rule 127- Provisional Remedies in Criminal cases.

1

REVISED RULES ON CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

I. PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONSa) Criminal Procedure

i. Definitionii. Sourcesiii. Distinguished from Criminal Lawiv. Construction of rule

b) Jurisdictioni. Definitionii. Distinguished from venueiii. Criminal Jurisdiction; Requisites; How

determined;iv. Territorial Jurisdictionv. Exception to Territorial Principlevi. Definition and Apportionment of

Jurisdiction

II. Rule 110. Prosecution of Offenses

a) Sec. 1. Institution of Criminal Actions1. Reodica v. C.A., 292 SCRA 872. Francisco v. C.A., 122 SCRA 5383. Domingo v. Sandiganbayan, 322 SCRA 6554. Dominador v. Sandiganbayan, 328 SCRA 2925. Ong v. People, 342 SCRA 3726. Samson v. Guingona, Jr., 348 SCRA 32

b) Sec. 2. The Complaint or Information7. City of Manila vs. Rizal, 27 Phil 508. Ngo Yao Tit vs. Sheriff of Manila, 27 Phil 378

c) Sec. 3. Complaint defined

d) Sec. 4. Information defined9. People v. Mendez, 335 SCRA 147 10. Tam Wing Tak v. Makasiar, 350 SCRA 47511. Sanchez v. Demetriou, 277 SCRA 62712. People v. Oso, 62 Phil. 271

e) Sec. 5. Who must prosecute criminal actions13. Visbal v. Judge Ramos, A.M. No. MTJ-00-1306,

Mar. 20, 200114. People v. Beriales, 70 SCRA 361 15. Bravo v. Court of Appeals, 208 SCRA 53116. Chua Burce v. Court of Appeals, 331 SCRA 117. People v. Tanada, 166 SCRA 36018. People v. Bugtong, 169 SCRA 76719. Pilapil v. Ibay Somera, 174 SCRA 65320. People v. Schneckenburger, 73 Phil 41321. Fernandez v. Lantin, 74 SCRA 33822. Perez v. Hagonoy Rural Bank, 327 SCRA

585

2

N.B. Read Article 344 of the RPC in relation to sec 5, Rule 110 of the Revised Rules. You must note that rape is now a crime against persons and was deleted as one of the private crimes that can only be commenced by the offended party pursuant to RA 8353, The anti-rape law of 1997) The complaint required in said Art. 344 is merely a condition precedent to the exercise of the proper authorities of the power to prosecute the guilty parties

f) Sec. 6. Sufficiency of complaint or information23. People v. Bayya, 327 SCRA 77124. Serra v. Mortiga, 11 Phil 762

g) Sec. 7. Name of the accused25. People v. Narvaes, 59 Phil 73826. People v. Ramos, 85 Phil 6827. People v. Perresa, 362 SCRA 202

h) Sec. 8. Designation of the offense28. People v. Labado, 98 SCRA 73029. People v. Torres, 165 SCRA 70230. People v. Cosare, 95 Phil 65731. People v. Nuñez, 310 SCRA 16832. People v. Nava, 333 SCRA 749

i) Sec. 9. Cause of Accusation33. US v. Tan Choco, 12 Phil 262

j) Sec. 10. Place of commission of the offense34. People v. Mercado, 65 Phil 66835. People v. Pinuela et. Al, 91 Phil 53

k) Sec. 11. Date of commission of the offense36. People v. Gianan-, 340 SCRA 47737. People v. Magbanua, 319 SCRA 71938. People v. Ladrillo, 320 SCRA 61

l) Sec. 12. Name of the offended partym) Sec. 13. Duplicity of the offense

n) Sec. 14. Amendment or Substitution39. Crespo v. Mogul, 151 SCRA 462,40. Dimatulac v. Villon, 297 SCRA 67941. Dungog v. Court of Appeals, 159 SCRA 14542. Gabionza v. CA, G.R. No. 140311, Mar. 30,

2001

o) Sec. 15. Place where the action is to be instituted43. Parulan v. Director of Prisons, 22 SCRA 63844. People v. Grospe, 157 SCRA 155

p) Sec. 16. Intervention of the offended party in criminal action

45. Diel v. Martinez, 76 Phil. 273

III. Rule 111- Prosecution of Civil Actionsa) Sec. 1. Institution of criminal and civil action

3

1. Mendoza v. Arrieta, 91 SCRA 1132. Yakult Phils. v. CA, 190 SCRA 3573. Maniago v. CA. 253 SCRA 674

b) Sec. 2. When separate civil action is suspended

c) Sec. 3. When civil action may proceed independently

4. Padua v. Robles, 66 SCRA 485

d) Sec. 4. Effect of death on civil actions5. Limjoco v. Intestate Estate of Fragante, 80 Phil. 7776. U.S. v. Dela Torre, 25 Phil. 36

e) Sec. 5. Judgment in civil action not a bar7. Salta v. De Veyra, 117 SCRA 212

f) Sec. 6. Suspension by reason of prejudicial question

g) Sec. 7. Elements of Prejudicial Question 8. Donato v. Luna, 160 SCRA 4419. Marbella-Bobis v. Bobis, 336 SCRA 75010. Umali vs. IAC, 186 SCRA 680

IV. Rule 112- Preliminary Investigation;

NB. This Rule has been partially amended by AM. 05-8-26-SC.

In essence the amendment consists of removing the conduct of preliminary investigation from judges of the first level courts.

a) Sec. 1. Preliminary Investigation defined1. People v. Monteverde, 142 SCRA 6682. People v. Lambino, 103 SCRA 5043. Doromal v. Sandiganbayan, 177 SCRA 3544. People v. CA, 301 SCRA 4755. Webb v. De Leon, 247 SCRA 652

b) Sec. 2. Officers authorized to conduct preliminary investigations

c) Sec. 3. Procedured) Sec. 4. Resolution of Investigating prosecutor and its

review

NB: Section 5 of the Rules of Court was deleted by A.M. 05-8-26-SC which took effect last January 1, 2006.

The following is the new Section 5.

e) Sec. 5. When warrant of arrest may issue6. People v. Inting, 187 SCRA 7887. Lim v. Felix, 194 SCRA 292

4

f) Sec. 6. When accused lawfully arrested without warrant (formerly Sec. 7)

See: R.A. 9372 Human Security Act of 2007

g) Sec. 7. Records (formerly Sec. 8)h) Sec. 8. Cases not requiring a preliminary investigation nor

covered by the Rules on Summary Procedure. (formerly Sec. 9)

V. Rule 113- Arrest;a) Sec. 1. Definition of Arrest

1. People v. Domantay, 307 SCRA 1

b) Sec. 2. Arrest, how made2. People v. Oanis, 74 Phil. 2573. People v. Tudtud, G.R. No. 144036, Sept. 26,

‘03

c) Sec. 3. Duty of Arresting Officer4. People v. Rodriquez, 341 SCRA 6455. Sayo v. Chief of Police, 80 Phil. 859

d) Sec. 4. Execution of Warrant6. Mamangon v. CFI, 189 SCRA 217

e) Sec. 5. Arrest without warrant7. People v. Bati, 189 SCRA 1038. People v. Claudio, 160 SCRA 6489. People v. Ancheta, 68 Phil. 41510. People v. Sucro, 195 SCRA 38811. People v. Aminnudin, 163 SCRA 40212. Posadas v. Ombudsman, 341 SCRA 388

f) Sec. 6. Time of making arrest

g) Sec. 7. Method of arrest by officer by virtue of a warrant

13. People v. Palatin, 311 SCRA 18614. Cadua vs. CA, 312 SCRA 703

h) Sec. 8. Method of arrest by officer without warranti) Sec. 9. Method of arrest by private personj) Sec. 10. Officer may summon assistance k) Sec. 11. Right of Officer to break into building or enclosurel) Sec. 12. Right to break out from building or enclosurem)Sec. 13. Arrest after escape or rescuen) Sec. 14. Right of attorney or relative to visit person

arrested

VI. Rule 114- Bail;a) Sec. 1. Bail defined.

1. Almeda v. Villaluz, 86 SCRA 382. Maguddatu v. CA, 326 SCRA 3623. Bangayan v. Butacan, 345 SCRA 3014. Garcia-Padilla v. Enrile, 121 SCRA 472

5

5. Aswat v. Galido, 204 SCRA 205

b) Sec. 2. Conditions of the bail; Requirements. 6. Manotoc Jr., v. CA, 142 SCRA 149

c) Sec. 3. No release or transfer except on court order or bail

d) Sec. 4. Bail, a matter of right; exception;7. People v. Gako, Jr., 348 SCRA 3348. Comia v. Astona, 337 SCRA 6569. Paderang v. CA, 247 SCRA 74110. Teehankee v. Director of Prisons, 76 Phil

756

e) Sec. 5. Bail, when discretionary11. Bravo, Jr., vs. Borja, 134 SCRA 466

f) Sec. 6. Capital offense defined

NOTE: RA No. 9346 (AN ACT PROHIBITING THE IMPOSITION OF DEATH PENALTY IN THE PHILIPPINES, JUNE 24, 2006) abolished the death penalty. Hence, there is no more capital offense.

EXCEPTION: If the accused charged with a capital offense is a minor.

REASONOne who faces a probable death sentence has a particularly strong temptation to flee. This reason does not hold where the accused has been established without objection to be a minor who by law cannot be sentenced to death.

For purposes of recommending the amount of bail, the privileged mitigating circumstance of minority shall be considered. (Sec. 34 , RA No. 9344 or the JUVENILE JUSTICE AND WELFARE ACT OF 2006).

NOTE: RA No. 9344 suspends the sentence of persons convicted of an offense while they were below 18 years of age. For those committed by minors below 15 years old, there is NO criminal liability, only civil liability. Minors aged 15-17 years 11 months 29 days must have acted with discernment. Otherwise, they have no criminal liability.

g) Sec. 7. Capital offense or an offense punishable by reclusion perpetua or life imprisonment, not bailable.

h) Sec. 8. Burden of proof in bail application11. Narciso v. Sta. Romana-Cruz, 328 SCRA 505

i) Sec. 9. Amount of bail; guidelines12. De la Camara v. Enage, 41 SCRA 1

j) Sec. 10. Corporate Suretyk) Sec. 11. Property bond, how posted

6

l) Sec. 12. Qualification of sureties in property bond15. Villaseñor v. Abano, 21 SCRA 312

m)Sec. 13. Justification of suretiesn) Sec. 14. Deposit of cash as bailo) Sec. 15. Recognizancep) Sec. 16. Bail, when not required; reduced bail or

recognizance

q) Sec. 17. Bail, where filed.16. Borinaga v.Tamin, 226 SCRA 20617. Cruz v. Judge Yaneza, 304 SCRA 294

r) Sec. 18. Notice of application to prosecutor18. People v. Raba, 130 Phil. 38419. Paraga v. Veneracio, 269 SCRA 371

s) Sec. 19. Release on bail

t) Sec. 20. Increase or reduction of bail20. Sy Guan v. Amparo, 79 Phil. 690

u) Sec. 21. Forfeiture of Bail

v) Sec. 22. Cancellation of Bail21. People v. Lorredo, 50 Phil. 209

w) Sec. 23. Arrest of the accused out on bail22. Silverio v. CA, 195 SCRA 760

x) Sec. 24. No bail after final judgment; exceptiony) Sec. 25. Court supervision of detaineesz) Sec. 26. Bail not a bar on objections on illegal arrest, lack of

or irregular preliminary investigation

VII. Rule 115- Rights of the Accused;a) Sec. 1. Rights of the accused at the trial

1. People v. Ang Gioc Ko, 73 Phil. 3662. Peopl;e v. Dramayo, 42 SCRA 603. People v. Gines, 197 SCRA 4814. People v. Quibate, 131 SCRA 805. People v. Hildalgo, 85 Phil. 7566. Marcelo v. Sandiganbayan, 302 SCRA 1027. People v. Cayago, 312 SCRA 6238. People v. Bacor, 306 SCRA 5229. People v. Mendoza, G.R. No. 143702, Sept.

13, 200110. People v. De Vera, 312 SCRA 64011. People v. Mayorga, 346 SCRA 45812. People v. Rondero, 320 SCRA 38313. People v. Declaro, 170 SCRA 14314. Tan v. Gallardo, 73 SCRA 31515. People v. Bernas, 130 SCRA 178

See: THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT OF 1998 ( R.A. 8493)

7

VIII. Rule 116- Arraignment and Plea;a) Sec. 1. Arraignment and Plea; how made

1. Borja v. Mendoza, 77 SCRA 4222. People v. Abapo, 329 SCRA 5133. People v. Cariaga, 64 Phil. 390

b) Sec. 2. Plea of guilty to a lesser offense

c) Sec. 3. Plea of guilty to capital offense; reception of evidence

4. People v. De Luna, 174 SCRA 2045. People v. Dayot, 187 SCRA 6376. People v. Nadera, 324 SCRA 4907. People v. Molina, G.R. No. 14129-33, Dec. 14,

2001

d) Sec. 4. Plea of guilty to non-capital offense; reception of evidence, discretionary

8. People v. Acosta, 98 Phil. 6429. People v. De Mesa, 74 Phil. 74010. People v. Arconado, 4 SCRA 559 11. People v. Digoro, 16 SCRA 376

e) Sec. 5.Withdrawal of improvident plea of guilty12. People v. De Luna, 174 SCRA 20413. People v. Serrano, 85 Phil. 835

f) Sec. 6. Duty of court to inform accused of his right to counsel

14. People v. Serzo, Jr., 274 SCRA 55315. People v. Lamsing, 248 SCRA 472

g) Sec. 7. Appointment of counsel de officio16. Sayson v. People, 166 SCRA 68017. People v. Rio, 201 SCRA 702

h) Sec. 8. Time for counsel de officio to prepare for arraignment

18. People v. Bascuguin, G.R. No. 144404, Sept. 24, 2001

i) Sec. 9. Bill of particulars19. People v. Abad Santos, 76 Phil. 74420. Rocaberte v. People, 193 SCRA 152

j) Sec. 10. Production or inspection of material evidence in possession of prosecution

k) Sec. 11. Suspension of arraignment

IX. Rule 117- Motion to Quash;a) Sec. 1. Time to move to quash

1. People v. Givera, 349 SCRA 5132. Suy Sui v. People, 92 Phil. 684

b) Sec. 2. Forms and contents

8

3. People v. Asuncion, 161 SCRA 490

c) Sec. 3. Grounds4. Lacson v. Executive Secretary, 301 SCRA 3305. Llorente v. Sandiganbayan, 322 SCRA

3296. People v. Lagon, 185 SCRA 4427. Layosa v. Rodriquez, 86 SCRA 3008. Cruz v. Sandiganbayan, 194 SCRA 4749. People v. Diaz, 94 Phil. 71410. People v. Garcia, 46 Phil. 46311. U.S. v. Dela Torre, 25 Phil. 3612. People v. Misola, 87 Phil. 83013. Barrioquinto, v. Fernandez, et.al., 82 Phil.

64214. Monsanto v. Factoran, Jr., 170 SCRA

19015. Balite v. People, 124 Phil. 86816. Francisco v. CA, 122 SCRA 53817. People v. Villalon, 192 SCRA 52118. People v. Mogol, 131 SCRA 29619. People v. Hon. Tac-an, 300 SCRA 265

d) Sec. 4. Amendment of complaint or information

e) Sec. 5. Effects of sustaining the motion to quash20. Lavides v. CA, 325 SCRA 32121. Marcos v. Sandiganbayan, 326 SCRA 473

f) Sec. 6. Order sustaining the motion to quash not a bar to another prosecution; explain

22. Milo v. Salonga, 152 SCRA 11323. Caniza v. People, 159 SCRA 1624. People v. Silay, 74 SCRA 274

g) Sec. 7. Former conviction or acquittal; double jeopardy25. People v. Ilagan, 58 Phil. 55826. Abay v. Garcia, 162 SCRA 66527. People v. Bao, 100 Phil. 24328. People v. City of Manila, 121 SCRA 63729. People v. Relova, 148 SCRA 29430. Central Bank v. CA, 171 SCRA 49

h) Sec. 8. Provisional dismissal

i) Sec. 9. Failure to move to quash or to allege any ground therefor

X. Rule 118- Pre-trial;a) Sec. 1. Pre-trial; mandatory in criminal cases

1. U.S. v. Donato, 9 Phil. 701

b) Sec. 2. Pre-trial agreement2. Fule v. CA, 162 SCRA 4473. People v. Hernandez, 260 SCRA 27

9

c) Sec. 3. Non-appearance at pre-trial conferenced) Sec. 4. Pre-trial order

XI. Rule 119- Trial;a) Sec. 1. Time to prepare for trial b) Sec. 2. Continuous trial until terminated;

postponementsc) Sec. 3. Exclusionsd) Sec. 4. Factors for granting continuancee) Sec. 5. Time limit following an order for new trialf) Sec. 6. Extended time limit

g) Sec. 7. Public attorney’s duties where accused is imprisoned

1. People v. Buluran, 325 SCRA 476

h) Sec. 8. Sanctions

i) Sec. 9. Remedy where accused is not brought to trial within the time limit

2. Abardo v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 13951-72, Mar. 3,2001

j) Sec. 10. Law on speedy trial not a bar to provision on speedy trial in the Constitution

k) Sec. 11. Order of trial 3. People v. Balisacan, 17 SCRA 1194. People v. Gutierrez, 302 SCRA 643

l) Sec. 12. Application for examination of witness for accused before trial

m)Sec. 13. Examination of defense witness; how maden) Sec. 14. Bail to secure appearance of material witnesso) Sec. 15. Examination of witness for the prosecution

p) Sec. 16. Trial of severed accused5. People v. De Vera, Sr., 308 SCRA 77

q) Sec. 17. Discharge of accused to be state witness6. People v. Bacsa, 104 Phil. 1367. People v. Aniñon, 158 SCRA 7108. People v. Jamero, 24 SCRA 2069. People v. Beberino, 79 SCRA 694

r) Sec. 18. Discharge of accused operates as acquittal10. People v. De Guzman, 326 SCRA 13111. People v. Deong, 338 SCRA 657

s) Sec. 19. When mistake has been made in charging the proper offense

t) Sec. 20. Appointment of acting prosecutor12. Salcedo v. Liwag, 9 SCRA 609

10

u) Sec. 21. Exclusion of public prosecutorv) Sec. 22. Consolidation of trials of related offenses

w) Sec. 23. Demurrer to Evidence13. Godoy v. CA, 165 SCRA 14814. Alarilla v. Sandiganbayan, 338 SCRA

485

x) Sec. 24. Reopening

XII. Rule 120- Judgment;a) Sec. 1. Judgment; definition and form

1. Talabon v. Warden, 78 Phil. 5992. People v. Amondina, 220 SCRA 6

b) Sec. 2. Contents of the judgments3. People v. Abellera, 69 Phil. 6234. People v. Silo, 99 Phil. 2165. U.S. v. Avillar, 28 Phil. 1316. U.S. v. Iguidez, 36 Phil. 6807. Abejuela v. People, 200 SCRA 8068. Maximo v. Gerochi, Jr., 144 SCRA 326

c) Sec. 3. Judgment for two or more offenses9. People v. Corral, 157 SCRA 673

d) Sec. 4. Judgments in case of variance between allegation and proof

10. People v. Gallarde, 325 SCRA 17211. People v. Arondain, G.R. 131864-65,

Sept. 27, 2001

e) Sec. 5. When an offense includes or is included in another

12. U.S. v. Guzman, 8 Phil. 21

f) Sec. 6. Promulgation of judgment13. People v. Mendez, 28 SCRA 88114. People v. Jaranilla, 55 SCRA 56315. People v. Mapalao, 197 SCRA 79

g) Sec. 7. Modification of judgmenth) Sec. 8. Entry of judgmenti) Sec. 9. Existing provisions governing suspension of

sentence, probation and parole, not affected by this Rule

XIII. Rule 121- New trial or Reconsideration;a) Sec. 1. New trial or reconsideration

1. Evaristo v. Lastrilla, 110 Phil. 181

b) Sec. 2. Grounds for new trial2. People v. Castelo, 1 SCRA 461

c) Sec. 3. Grounds for reconsiderationd) Sec. 4. Form of motion and notice to the prosecutor

11

3. Paredes v. Borja, 3 SCRA 495

e) Sec. 5. Hearing of motion f) Sec. 6. Effects of granting a new trial or

reconsideration4. People v. Ebias, 324 SCRA 675

XIV. Rule 122- Appeal;a) Sec. 1. Who may appeal

1. Kepner v. U.S., 11 Phil. 6692. People v. Paet, 100 Phil. 3573. People v. Hart, 24 Phil. 5784. Central bank v. CA, 171 SCRA 495. People v. Desalisa, 125 Phil. 276. People v. Gomez, 20 SCRA 2937. People v. Ursua, 60 Phil. 2528. Bernardo v. CA, 190 SCRA 639. People v. Sison, 312 SCRA 792

b) Sec. 2. Where to appealc) Sec. 3. How appeal taken

10. People v. Francisco, 254 SCRA 47511. People v. Cleopas, 327 SCRA 552

o) Sec. 4. Service of notice of appeal

p) Sec. 5. Waiver of notice12. U.S. v. Sotevento, 40 Phil. 17613. Director of Prisons v. Teodoro, 97 Phil

372

q) Sec. 6. When appeal to be taken r) Sec. 7. Transcribing and filing of notes of stenographic

reporter upon appeals) Sec. 8. Transmission of papers to appellate courtt) Sec. 9. Appeal to the Regional Trial Courtu) Sec. 10. Transmission of records in case of death

penalty

v) Sec. 11. Effect of appeal by any of severed accused15. People v. Fernandez, 186 SCRA 83016. People v. Rodriguez, 341 SCRA 645

w) Sec. 12. Withdrawal of appeal 17. People v. Maguddayao, 132 SCRA 3418. People v. Villanueva, 93 Phil. 92719. People v. Dueno, 90 SCRA 2320. People v. Madrigal-Gonzales, 117 SCRA 956

x) Sec. 13. Appointment of counsel de officio for accused on appeal

XV. Rule 123- Procedure in Municipal Courts;a) Sec. 1. Uniform procedure

XVI. Rule 124- Procedure in the Court of Appeals;

12

a) Sec. 1. Title of the case

b) Sec. 2. Appointment of counsel de officio for the accused

1. People v. Rio, 201 SCRA 702

c) Sec. 3. When brief for appellant to be filed d) Sec. 4. When brief for appellee to be filed; reply brief of the

appellant e) Sec. 5. Extension of time for filing briefsf) Sec. 6. Form of briefg) Sec. 7. Contents of brief

h) Sec. 8. Dismissal of appeal for abandonment or failure to prosecute

2. People v. Mapalao, 197 SCRA 793. People v. Bugnay, 128 SCRA 31

i) Sec. 9. Prompt disposition of appeals4. Sycip v. CA, 134 SCRA 317

j) Sec. 10. Judgment not to be reversed or modified except for substantial error

5. People v. Cabiling, 74 SCRA 285

k) Sec. 11. Scope of Judgment l) Sec. 12. Power to receive evidence m)Sec. 13. Quorum of the court; certification or appeal of

cases to Supreme Courtn) Sec. 14. Motion for new trial

o) Sec. 15. Where new trial conducted6. People v. Mamatik, 105 Phil. 479

p) Sec. 16. Reconsiderationq) Sec. 17. Judgment transmitted and filed in trial courtr) Sec. 18. Application of certain rules in civil procedure to

criminal procedure

XVII. Rule 125- Procedure in the Supreme Court;a) Sec. 1. Uniform procedure

b) Sec. 2. Review of decisions of Court of Appeals1. FNCB Finance v. Estavillo, 192 SCRA 5152. Joaquin v. Navarro, 93 Phil. 2573. Cruz v. Sosing, 94 Phil. 26

c) Sec. 3. Decision if opinion is equally divided4. Sumbingco v. CA, 155 SCRA 24

XVIII. Rule 126- Search and seizure;a) Sec. 1. Search warrant defined

1. Nolasco v. Paño, 139 SCRA 1542. Stonehill v. Diokno, 20 SCRA 3833. Burgos v. Chief of Staff, 133 SCRA 8004. Corro v. Lising, 137 SCRA 541

13

5. Columbia Pictures v. Flores, 223 SCRA 7616. Kho v. Makalintal, 306 SCRA 707. Mata v. Bayona, 128 SCRA 388

b) Sec. 2. Court where application for search warrant shall be filed

c) Sec. 3. Personal property to be seized 9. Yee Sue Koy v. Almeda, 70 Phil. 141

d) Sec. 4. Requisites for issuing search warrant 10. Uy v. BIR, 344 SCRA 3611. People v. CA, 216 SCRA 10112. Uy Khetin v. Villareal, 42 Phil 88713. Tambasen v. People, 246 SCRA 18414. Alvarez v. CFI of Tayabas, 64 Phil. 33

e) Sec. 5. Examination of complainant; record15. Asian Surety Ins. Co. v. Herrera, 54 SCRA

31216. People v. Peña, 97 Phil. 669

f) Sec. 6. Issuance and form of search warrant 17. WHO v. Aquino, 48 SCRA 242

g) Sec. 7. Right to break door or window to effect search

h) Sec. 8. Search of house, room, or premises, to be made in presence of two witnesses

18. Harvey v. Defensor-Santiago, 162 SCRA 840

19. Salazar v. Achacoso, 183 SCRA 155

i) Sec. 9. Time of making searchj) Sec. 10. Validity of search warrant k) Sec. 11. Receipt for the property seized

20. Quintero v. NBI, 162 SCRA 467

l) Sec. 12. Delivery of property and inventory thereof to court; return and proceedings thereon

20. Vlason Ent. Corp. v. CA, 155 SCRA 186

m)Sec. 13. Search incident to lawful arrest21. Roldan v. Arca, 65 Phil. 33622. Padilla v. CA, 269 SCRA 40223. People v. Guzman, 351 SCRA 57324. People v. Musa, 217 SCRA 60925. People v. Rodriquez, 205 SCRA 79126. Aballe v. People, 183 SCRA 19627. People v. Usana, 323 SCRA 75428. People v. Che Chung Ting, 328 SCRA 59229. Nolasco v. Paño, 147 SCRA 513

n) Sec. 14. Motion to quash a search warrant or to suppress evidence; where to file

14

XIX. Rule 127- Provisional Remedies in Criminal cases.a) Sec. 1. Availability of provisional remedies

1. Babalo v. Abaño, 90 Phil. 8272. Santos v. Hon. Flores, 5 SCRA 1136

b) Sec. 2. Attachment 3. Mindanao Savings, etc. v. CA, 172 SCRA 480

- GOOD LUCK -

15