In 2011 national performance assessment frameworks wereroutinely used by the agency to assess progress in 33% of IHP+countries where they exist. Target = 100%.

In 2011 100% of health sector aid was provided by the agencythrough multi-year commitments - no change from 100%. Target =90%.

In 2011 74% of health sector aid provided by the agency usednational public financial management systems - a decrease from97%. Target = 33% reduction in aid not using PFM systems (with ≥80% using country systems).

The health sector aid provided by the agency that used countryprocurement systems was deemed not applicable to Sweden.

In 2011, evidence exists in 67% of IHP+ countries that the agencysupported civil society engagement in health sector policyprocesses. Target = 100%.

In 2011 the agency participated in health sector mutualassessments of progress in 33% of IHP+ countries where theyexist. Target = 100%.

The capacity development that was provided by the agencythrough coordinated programmes was deemed not applicable toSweden.

In 2011 48% of health sector aid was provided by the agencythrough programme based approaches - a decrease from 68%.Target = 66%.

An IHP+ Country Compact or equivalent has been signed by theagency in 50% of IHP+ countries where they exist. Target = 100%.

In 2011 100% of health sector aid was reported by the agency onnational health sector budgets - an increase from 97%. Target =50% reduction in aid not on budget (with ≥ 85% on budget).

In 2011 the stock of parallel project implementation units (PIUs)used by the agency in the surveyed countries was 0.0 - no changefrom 0.0. Target = 66% reduction in stock of PIUs.

In 2011 100% of health sector aid disbursements provided by theagency were released according to agreed schedules - no changefrom 100% in 2005. Target = 71%.

DRC Ethiopia Uganda

Sweden’s total development aid budget for 2010 was SEK31,4 billion. This equals 3.9% of Sweden’s annual budget,and 1% of GDP for 2010. Of this budget Sida, Sweden’sinternational development cooperation agency, disbursedSEK 15.4billion in 2010 of which 9% were allocated to thehealth sector.

NO DATA2005/72005/7

20112011

100%100%

2005/72005/7

20112011

85%85%

NO DATA

2005/72005/7

20112011

50%50%

2005/72005/7

20112011

66%66%

2005/72005/7

20112011

90%90%

2005/72005/7

20112011

71%71%

NO DATA

NO DATA

2005/72005/7

20112011

80%80%

2005/72005/7

20112011

80%80%

2005/72005/7

20112011

2005/72005/7

20112011

100%100%

2005/72005/7

20112011

100%100%

2005/72005/7

20112011

100%100%

2012 PARTNER SCORECARD FOR Sweden

ORGANISATION PROFILE IHP+RESULTS COUNTRIES WHERE THE ORGANISATION IS ACTIVE

EXPECTED RESULTS RATING TARGET OVERALL PROGRESS

Commitments aredocumented and mutuallyagreed.

Support is based incountry plans andstrategies, including tostrengthen HealthSystems.

Funding commitments arelong-term.

Funds are disbursedpredictably, as committed.

Country systems forprocurement and publicfinancial management areused and strengthened.

Resources are beingmanaged for DevelopmentResults.

Mutual accountability isbeing demonstrated.

Civil Society meaningfullyengaged.

target achieved no progress or regressionprogress made towards achieving target data not provided measure not applicable indicates agreed target

Lower values are better

*

*Performance is assessed in only Niger, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone and Uganda. Budget support is also not counted. The rating may therefore not fully reflect progress, and could be an underestimate.

Prod

uced

by

the

inde

pend

ent N

orth

-Sou

th C

onso

rtium

for I

HP+

Resu

lts, m

anda

ted

by IH

P+ G

loba

l Com

pact

sig

nato

ries.

See

ww

w.ih

pres

ults

.net

Desig

n lic

ense

d w

ith C

reat

ive

Com

mon

s w

ith s

ome

rest

rictio

ns, 2

010

SPECIFIC ACTIONS TO ACHIEVE RESULTS

This additional information is reported by the Organisation to explain what specific actions it is taking to implement its IHP+ commitments to the8 Expected Results, or to qualify its measures of progress.

HOW TO INTERPRET THIS SCORECARDExpected Results reflect key commitments that were made by IHP+ signatories in the IHP+ Global Compact. Each expected result hascorresponding standard performance measures to track progress over time. The progress of all agencies is rated against these mutuallyagreed expectations.Rating symbols illustrate whether the Agency has achieved , is working towards , or has not achieved its targets overthe most recent annual reporting cycle. Details of these independent assessments undertaken by the IHP+Results Consortium can befound online in the North-South Observatory for IHP+Results (www.ihpresults.net).Target describes the aggregate data on which the Rating is based, with a comparison of 2011 and baseline performance.Overall Progress shows a two-bar graph with the aggregate data for the agency in question across all the countries for which healthsector support has been reported. In most cases, the agreed target for each standard performance measure (SPM) is shown as a redline.Scorecard ratings are aggregates of performance across a number of countries. Aggregates might hide variations in the agency'sperformance. Disaggregated data can be found at www.ihpresults.netNB: The ratings presented here are based on self-reported data. IHP+Results has taken steps to triangulate this data using othersources. More details are vailable at www.ihpresults.net