42

Sustainability – Going Green

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Sustainability – Going Green
Page 2: Sustainability – Going Green

Sustainability – Going Green

Thomas Van Dam, Ph.D., P.E.Principal

Annual Concrete Conference 2021Thursday, December 9, 2021

Page 3: Sustainability – Going Green

Suddenly, Sustainability Is All The Rage• Politicians come and go, but scientific facts

remain– The Arctic continue to melt and sea levels are rising– As I write this, it is snowing hard in the U.P.

• The Biden administration is emphasizing climate change and social equity– Climate change is a focal point in infrastructure bill

• Sustainable solutions are of increasing interest to governmental agencies and industry

• Sustainability is important in Minnesota

Page 4: Sustainability – Going Green

Climate Change• Changes in global climate from human

activities are occurring– Supported by historical observation and climate

modeling• Optimistic models predict substantial climate

change over the next century– Rate of change dependent on human activities– Long life of emitted heat-trapping, greenhouse

gases and slow feedback functions of atmospheric systems drive climate change

Page 5: Sustainability – Going Green

Certainty“It is unequivocal that human influence has warmed the atmosphere, ocean and land. Widespread and rapid changes in the atmosphere, ocean, cryosphere and biosphere have occurred”

IPCC, 2021: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis

UncertaintyThe degree of change is uncertain as many variables are important and as yet, undefined

Page 6: Sustainability – Going Green

Changes in Global Surface Temperatures Relative to 1850-1900 (IPCC 2021)

IPCC, 2021: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis

Page 7: Sustainability – Going Green

Global Surface Temperature Increases Compared to 1850-1900

IPCC, 2021: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis

Page 8: Sustainability – Going Green

Projected Sea Level Rise

Page 9: Sustainability – Going Green

The Sustainability Triple Bottom LineSustainable practices are simply good engineering

And not just GHG emissions or environmental impacts

Page 10: Sustainability – Going Green

Sustainable Solutions Require Life-Cycle Thinking

Long-life designOptimized design

Reduced energyBlended cementsAlternative cements

EfficiencyCaCO3 mineralization

Work together tominimize GHG emissions

RecyclingCarbonation

Page 11: Sustainability – Going Green

Challenges In Front of Us• Change is difficult

– Must ween ourselves from business as usual• Traditional cement and concrete are

carbon intensive• Designs and materials are dictated by past

experience and “conservatism” in codes and specifications

DON’T BE SAD – INNOVATE!

Page 12: Sustainability – Going Green

There is Hope!• New policies and initiatives are focused on

sustainability– New infrastructure bill– State and local initiatives

• The cement and concrete industry is focused on change– PCA’s Net Zero by 2050– ACI, ASTM and others

• Organizations and associations are responding to the need to innovate– ACPA, APWA, ASCE, etc.– Others (e.g., Breakthrough Energy)

Page 13: Sustainability – Going Green

What Can We Do?

• Stay educated – This is really important• Adopt life cycle thinking• Wise use of materials• Consider the use phase • Verification

What Can We Do? A LOT!

Page 14: Sustainability – Going Green

Hydraulic Cement and Concrete Mixtures• Hydraulic cement concrete is humankind’s most

used material after water– Approximately 1 yd3/person/year– Civilization is built on it– 5%-8% of global GHG emissions

• Large economic, environmental, and social impacts– 88.5 million metric tons of cement manufactured in

the U.S. in 2019– In 2018, linked to 0.6% of US GHG emissions

Page 15: Sustainability – Going Green

Materials and Mixtures• Material extraction, production, transportation• Mixture batching and concrete plant operations• Focus is often on cradle to gate

– Assumption is long-life is not compromised

Page 16: Sustainability – Going Green

GHG Emissions Associated With Concrete at the Gate• ~1.5% from acquiring and processing raw

materials• ~89% from cement manufacturing

– ~37% from burning fuel– ~46% from calcination

• ~9.5% from making concreteNet result: for every pound (kg) of U.S. made typical

ASTM C150 Type I cement, about 0.94 lbs (kg) of GHG emissions are released

Page 17: Sustainability – Going Green

Total GHG Emissions Embodied in Concrete

Typical concrete at the gate:0.26 tons CO2 /yd3 concrete0.23 tons CO2 from portland cement

Cement

GravelSandWater

Page 18: Sustainability – Going Green

Elements of PCA’s Net Zero by 2050• Clinker optimization

– Production enhancements– Sequestration

• Cement optimization– Blended portland cements– Alternative cements

• Concrete optimization– Reduced cementitious materials content– Longevity

• In-service and end-of-life carbonation– For structural concrete, small but still significant

Page 19: Sustainability – Going Green

Clinker Optimization• Reduce GHG emissions during production

including– Make kilns super efficient– High efficiency grinding mills– Fuels including waste fuels and plasma

• Carbon dioxide sequestration– Kiln flue gas has high CO2 concentration…typically

about 25 mol% vs 14% for coal-fired power plant vs 0.033% in atmosphere

– Excellent opportunity to sequester CO2

Page 20: Sustainability – Going Green

Cement Optimization• Replace clinker with supplementary

cementitious materials (SCMs)– Obtained as blended cement (ASTM

C595)– Blend at concrete plant

• Replace clinker with ground limestone– ASTM C595 Type IL blended cement

can have up to 15% limestone– On-going work to look at higher

limestone content

Page 22: Sustainability – Going Green

Alternative SCMs• Reclaimed coal ash

– From landfills and ponds– Mix of fly ash and bottom ash– Often requires processing

• Ground glass pozzolan• SCM produced from carbon dioxide

sequestration

Page 23: Sustainability – Going Green

ASTM C595 Blended Cements

• Produced by cement manufacturers• Type IP(X), Type IS(X),

and Type IT (X)(Y)– Blended with pozzolan, slag cement,

limestone or ternary blend• Type IL will reduce carbon footprint by 8 to 10

percent with little impact on behavior• Can be designated as moderate sulfate

resistance (MS), high sulfate resistance (HS), moderate heat (MH), or low heat (LH)

Page 24: Sustainability – Going Green

LC3 Cement

LC3 is a family of cements,the figure refers tothe clinker content

• 50% less clinker• 40% less CO2• Similar strength• Better chloride resistance• Resistant to alkali silica reaction

0

20

40

60

80

100

PC PPC30 LC3-50 LC3-65

Mas

s pro

port

ion

(%)

GypsumLimestoneCalcined clayClinker

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Com

pres

sive

stre

ngth

(MPa

)

1 day

7 days

28 days

90 days

K. Scrivener, 2020

PC LC3-50

Page 25: Sustainability – Going Green

Alternative Cements• Alternative cements are available

– e.g., calcium sulfoaluminate cements, calcium aluminate

– Alkali-activated hydraulic cements– Geopolymers

• Specialty applications• No scenario exists in which sufficient

alternative cements are available for large-scale replacement of portlandcement Provis, van Deventer, 2014

Page 26: Sustainability – Going Green

Reduce Cementitious Content in Concrete• Maximize aggregate content through use of optimized aggregate grading

Tarantula curved based on Tyler Ley et al.

Page 27: Sustainability – Going Green

Common Fallacy: Increasing Cement Content Does Not Increase Strength

Based on Taylor and Wilson

Page 28: Sustainability – Going Green

Real Data from Project NEON

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

06/14/17 08/03/17 09/22/17 11/11/17 12/31/17 02/19/18 04/10/18 05/30/18 07/19/18 09/07/18 10/27/18

3-Da

y Av

erag

e Fl

exur

al S

tren

gth

(psi)

Date Placed

3-Day Average Flexural Strength

AE532 AE703FA• 500 pcy• 611 pcy

Page 29: Sustainability – Going Green

Project NEON Concrete

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

06/14/17 08/03/17 09/22/17 11/11/17 12/31/17 02/19/18 04/10/18 05/30/18 07/19/18 09/07/18 10/27/18

28-D

ay A

vera

ge F

lexu

ral S

tren

gth

(psi)

Date Placed

28-Day Average Flexural Strength

AE532 AE703FA

Page 30: Sustainability – Going Green

Reducing GHG Emissions by Minimizing Cement Content and Increasing SCMs

376

564

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

0 25 50Percent Replacement with SCMs

Poun

ds C

O2/

yd3

Page 31: Sustainability – Going Green

What About CO2 Sequestration Through Carbonation?• It is a real thing• Anderson, et. al. 2019. “Carbonation as a

method to improve climate performance for cement based materials.” Cement and Concrete Research (2019)

• Paper quantifies uptake of CO2 by concrete through carbonation– Ca(OH)2 + CO2 →CaCO3 + H2O– C-S-H also undergoes carbonation– Uses Fick’s law

Page 32: Sustainability – Going Green

How Much Carbonation Occur in a Typical U.S. Concrete?• Depends on exposure and quality of concrete

– Is climate wet or dry? Is it exposed to rain?

• Quality of concrete– In the paper is related to strength, but it is permeability that matters– Related to w/cm

• In general, dry concrete that is permeable (low strength) will have a higher degree of carbonation than wet concrete that has low permeability (high strength)

Page 33: Sustainability – Going Green

Applying This to a Typical U.S. Pavement

• Assume 564 lbs/cy pure portland cement mix with a compressive strength of 4000 psi that is exposed to rain– Note that less carbonation would occur if less cement and/or

SCMs were used• The amount of CO2 sequestered through carbonation is

calculated to be between 0.2-0.3 lbs/ft2 of surface area in 50 years– Roughly 14,000-20,000 lbs per lane-mile, or equivalent to 700 to

1000 gallons of fuel consumed

Page 34: Sustainability – Going Green

Pounds CO2 Sequestered Over Time per Lane-Mile

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

lbs S

eque

ster

ed/L

ane-

Mile

Time (Years)

F’c = 3,600-5,100 psi

F’c = > 5,100 psi

Page 35: Sustainability – Going Green

Preservation Through Diamond Grinding Increases Carbonation• Rate of carbonation decreases with time

– Roughly 45% of carbonation over 50 years occurs by Year 10

• Diamond grinding creates a “fresh” surface with more surface area for carbonation

• Grinding every 10 years will more than double the amount of sequestered CO2

• Overlaying concrete with asphalt will shut out atmospheric CO2 and terminate sequestration

Page 36: Sustainability – Going Green

Pounds CO2 Sequestered Over Time per Lane-Mile

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

45000

50000

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

lbs S

eque

ster

ed/L

ane-

Mile

Time (Years)

Range with grinding every 10 years

Range without grinding

Page 37: Sustainability – Going Green

Diamond Grinding is Close to Carbon Neutral• Diamond grinding every 10 years results in 17,400 to 25,300 lbs

of additional CO2 being sequestered over 50 years per lane-mile– This is equivalent to 870 to 1,270 gallons of diesel fuel consumed over

50 years• Four diamond grindings consumes between 1,000 and 1,600

gallons of diesel– 250-400 gallons per lane-mile of grinding

• Improved vehicle fuel efficiency due to improved smoothness results in greater than net zero GHG emissions

Page 38: Sustainability – Going Green

Assessing Sustainability• Use of unbiased, factually-based tools/resources

to assess life cycle impacts are essential– There is A LOT of greenwashing going on– It is only through standardized assessment can we

know if we are doing the right thing• An LCA method meeting ISO standards is the best

way to assess environmental impact– Request EPDs– Stay informed– Seek help as needed

Page 39: Sustainability – Going Green

Nice Story, But…? VERIFY• Assessment tools should be used to

evaluate the economic, environmental, and social impacts of alternatives over the life cycle

• Tools for environmental impact assessment are currently under development– Environmental product declarations– FHWA LCA tool– eLCAP in California– Athena Pavement LCA

“Trust, but verify”

Page 40: Sustainability – Going Green

Some Current Initiatives

• MnROAD low carbon paving mixtures– In cooperation with NRRA– 16 test cells evaluating various carbon-

reduction strategies• Identification and elimination of barriers

restricting carbon reduction strategies– Funded by Breakthrough Energy Foundation

• Many other Federal and State efforts

Page 41: Sustainability – Going Green

Summary

• Sustainable concrete practices are available for all concrete structures at all phases of life

• Sustainability requires a life cycle perspective• Strive to optimize your cement and concrete• Use rigorous verification to avoid “greenwashing”• As an industry, the future is bright

Page 42: Sustainability – Going Green

Thomas Van Dam, Ph.D., [email protected]

Questions?