Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Payments InstituteJuly 21-24, 2019 • Emory University, Atlanta GA
SURVEY OF CARD PRODUCTS & CLEARING
Jennifer Stadler, CPPVice President Marketing, Strategy &
Communications
Disclaimer
This material is derived from collaborative work product
developed by PaymentsFirst ─ a member of the Regional
Payments Associations.
This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal
advice, and is intended for educational purposes only. The
information in this document and discussed during this
presentation is the exclusive property of PaymentsFirst. It may
not be copied, disclosed, or distributed, in whole, or part, without
the express, written permission of PaymentsFirst.
Agenda
• Card Payments Ecosystem
• EMV
• Zero Liabilities/Error Resolution
• Managing Disputes/Fallback Transactions
Card Payments Ecosystem
• Barter System exchange
• Cash Pooling (bank accounts and deposits)
• Cashless payments credit cards, checks, e-wallets
• Goods to Grain
• Metal Coins to Paper
• Bank Accounts to e-wallets
• Money’s various forms
Card Payments Ecosystem
• Rapid pace, new providers, new platforms, new payment tools daily
• Buying in a store, online or mobile device, the shift of consumer behavior drives retailers to adapt toward fast, simple & secure mobile payments.
Card Payments Ecosystem
Evolve….Adapt….Transform• Technology
• Regulatory Oversight
Consumers Define Market• When, where, how they bank
and pay for goods and services
Online - Expectations• Customer Data Analytics
• Customize Experiences
• Retail Banking High Demand
Merchant’s Bank Customer
Merchant Bank’sProcessor
Credit Card Network
Issuing Bank
THE
CREDIT CARD PAYMENT
PROCESS
Merchant’s Business
InternetWeb Payment
Software9
Standard Terminology
Copyright 2019 PaymentsFirst. All Rights Reserved. This Presentation is for education purposes only and current to date.
Merchant GatewayRisk
Management Processing
AcquiringCredit Card
Assoc’s/NetworkIssuer Consumer
Card Payments Ecosystem
Governing body of Financial Institutions (Merchant Acquiring Bank)
ISO’s & MSP’s, working together to support credit card processing. Interchange fees, qualification guidelines, improvements to network and brands, arbiter between Visa and MC.
Non Financial InstitutionDo Not Issue CardsDo Not Issue Merchant Accts.Clearing house for respective card brand.
Card Payments Ecosystem
Determine how cards may be usedUnderwriting, Risk Management, Customer Service, Technical Support done internallyDetermine rates, fees, processing rules for respective card brand
Financial InstitutionIssue CardsIssue Merchant Accts.
Card Payments EcosystemVisaMastercardThe Federal Trade Commission (FTC)The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)The United States Federal Communication Commission (FCC)The Office of Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporate (FDIC)The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF)The Internal Revenue Service (IRS)The United States Department of TreasuryThe Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC)The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)
Card Payments Ecosystem
CARD BRAND 2014
Visa 43.6%
MasterCard 24.9%
American Express 26.6%
Diners 4.9%
CARD BRAND 2017 Credit 2017 Credit Debit
Visa 53% 60%
MasterCard 22% 25%
American Express 21% 13%
Diners 4% 2%
2018 Nilson Report
Card Payments Ecosystem
Credit Card
Standard Credit Card
Secured Credit Card
Reward Credit Card
Charge Credit Card
Specialty Credit Card
Prepaid Credit Card
Card Payments Ecosystem
• MCC (Merchant Category Code)• Retail• Supermarket• Restaurants• Hotel/Lodging• Rental• Automated Fueling• Direct Marketing• Electronic Commerce
Card Payments Ecosystem
• Open Loop Visa and MasterCard• Closed Loop American Express and Discover• Consumer Credit Protection Act• The Fair Credit Billing Act• Electronic Funds Transfer Act• The Patriot Act• The Card Act of 2009• Card Association Operating Rules• Card Network Rules
Card Payments Ecosystem• Signature Debit Transaction: • PIN Debit Transaction:• Merchant fees • ACCEL, AFFN, Interlink, Maestro, JEANIE, NYCE, Pulse,
Shazam, Star are all debit card networks• Standard Debit Cards: Draw funds directly from cardholders
bank account• Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT): Issued by the state and
federal agencies allowing qualified users benefits to make purchases
• Prepaid Debit Cards: Access to bank account to make electronic purchases up to a certain amount which is pre-loaded on a card
Card Payments Ecosystem
• Cardholders may authorize debit card purchases using either PIN or signature
• Transactions are authorized with PIN process on PIN debit network
• Transactions authorized through signature are processed on credit card network
• Running debit card as a ”credit”, means run on credit card network
• Subject to debit card rules, not credit card rules (credit card regulations often list exclusions for debit cards)
• Minimum charges are not allowed for debit card purchases (commonly mistaken for minimum charge restrictions credit cards have)
Card Payments Ecosystem
• A business cannot permit surcharging for debit card transactions, even through 41 states allow it for credit cards. A debit card ran as “credit” is not an exception to this rule, only credit cards have this ability under certain conditions
• Subject to interchange or PIN debit network fees
• Cheapest authorization method varies on a couple of factors, such as transaction size, and: Regulated: debit cards issued
by FI with $10 billion or more in assets; capped cost similar for PIN and signature
Unregulated: debit cards issued by FI less than $10 billion in assets; PIN debit transactions are least
expensive for larger amounts, signature debit transactions are least for smaller amounts
Card Payments Ecosystem
• Deposit Account – No credit approval• Global Acceptance ATM• Daily ATM & POS limits apply• Regulation E• Electronic Funds Transfer Act• Regulation II Durbin Amendment• The Card Act of 2009• Card Association Operating Rules
VISA, MasterCard, STAR, CO-OP, Plus, Cirrus, NYCE, AFFN, etc
• Patriot Act
EMVEuropay, MasterCard & Visa
Embedded Microchip
Microprocessor chip turns the card into a smart card enabingcommunication of secure data
Embedded Antenna
Antenna connects embedded microchip, communicates secure EMV transaction data to point of sale terminal
Global standard for chip-based debit and credit card transactionsOver the last decade, fraud #’s have increased significantly in the U.S.
Europe and Canada’s adoption of EMV decreased fraud at the POS (Point of Sale). As fraud decreased abroad, U.S. fraud increased Card
networks began pushing U.S. merchants in the U.S. to upgrade payment solutions to accept EMV chip card transactions.
EMV
• 2014 U.S. fraud accounts for 76% of breaches worldwide. Next in line was the United Kingdom (8%), Canada (4%), Australia (2%), Israel (1%) and China (1%).
• According to Barclays 2015 research: U.S. responsible for 47& of world’s card fraud despite only 24% of total worldwide card volume.
• 2014 Cross-Border transactions • U.S. credit card fraud rises 31.8 million up 3 times
from the previous year
EMV
Visa MasterCard American Express Discover
October 2015 Party that is cause of contact chip not occurring are financially liable for any resulting card present counterfeit losses. Doesn’t include AFD.
MC Account Data Compromise (ADC) relief takes effect 100%. On this date if at least 95% of MC transactions originate from EMV POS terminals the merchant is relieved 100% of account data compromise penalties.
Will include fraud liability shift (FLS) policy that will transfer liability for certain types of transactions away from the party that has most secure form of EMV technology.
Will include FLS (U.S. Canada & Mexico). This FLS policy will be risk based payments hierarchy that benefits the entity that leverages the highest level of available payments security.
October 2020 Deadline for AFD to comply.
MC liability hierarchy takes effect fuel dispensers.
FLS takes effect for transaction generated from FD.
FLS takes effect for transactions generated from AFD.
October 2017 Liability Shift in U.S. for ATMs
October 2016 Liability Shift in U.S. for ATMs
EMV
Chip & Pin Chip & Signature
Token/Cryptogram
Dynamic/Static
EMV
Can a card be both chip and signature and chip and pin?
Yes
Most credit cards are signature priority few are pin preferredTarget RedCard and Diners Club Cards
EMV
• Liability for card fraud falls upon the least EMV compliant party
• Prior to October 1, 2015 Issuer liability
EMV POS Counterfeit Fraud Liability
Chip Capability- Card Chip Capability- POS Counterfeit Liability
Magnetic Terminal Not Contact Chip Enabled
Issuer
Magnetic Contact Chip Enabled Issuer
Chip Card Contact Chip Enabled Issuer
Counterfeit Mag Stripe with data copied from chip card
Terminal Not Enabled for ContactChip
Acquiring BankMerchant
Counterfeit Mag Stripe with data copied from chip card
Contact Chip Enabled Issuer
EMV ATM Counterfeit Fraud Liability
Chip Capability- Card Chip Capability- POS Counterfeit Liability
Magnetic Terminal Not Contact Chip Enabled
Issuer
Magnetic Contact Chip Enabled Issuer
Chip Card Contact Chip Enabled Issuer
Counterfeit Mag Stripe with data copied from chip card
Terminal Not Enabled for ContactChip
ATM Acquirer
Counterfeit Mag Stripe with data copied from chip card
Contact Chip Enabled Issuer
Lost or Stolen Fraud Card Present Contact Transactions: Amex, Disc & MC
Chip Capability- Card Chip Capability- POS Counterfeit Liability
Magnetic Any terminal type Issuer
Chip card, PIN-preferringCVM (online or offline)
Terminal not Enabled for Contact Chip
Acquiring Bank/Merchant
Chip Card, signature preferred Terminal Not Enabled for Contact
Issuer
Chip card, signature-preferred Contact Chip Enabled SignatureNo Pin Capability
Issuer
Chip Card, PIN preferred Contact Chip Enabled SignatureNo Pin Capability
Acquiring Bank/Merchant
EMV AFD Counterfeit FraudChip Capability- Card Chip Capability- POS Counterfeit Liability
Magnetic Terminal Not Contact Chip Enabled
Issuer
Magnetic Contact Chip Enabled Issuer
Chip Card Contact Chip Enabled Issuer
Counterfeit Mag Stripe with data copied from chip card
Terminal Not Enabled for ContactChip
Accel, AFFN, CU24, Discover, MC, NYCE, Pulse, Shazam Star, Visa(before October 1, 2020American Express (before October 16, 2020)
Counterfeit Mag Stripe with data copied from chip card
Contact Chip Enabled Issuer
Visa Zero Liability
Visa liability policy is a guarantee that cardholder will not be held responsible for fraudulent charges made by Visa card or account info.
Limitations Include
Applies: only to cards issued in US
Excludes: ATM transactions, PIN based transactions, Commercial Visa and transactions not processed by Visa, Anonymous Prepaid Card Transactions
MasterCard Zero Liability
MasterCard does not hold cardholders responsible for “unauthorized transactions made in store, over telephone or online, including ATM and PIN based transactions.Liability Limitations Account must be in good standingExercising reasonable care in safeguarding card from theftPromptly report loss or theft Does not include commercial cards, or unregistered prepaid cards/gift cards
Error ResolutionRegulations• Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act: 2010, Requires the Federal Reserve Board was required to develop a set of rules on debit card interchange fees and network routing restrictions by card networks and financial institutions
• Regulation II: October 1, 2010 1. Provision capped interchange fees 2. Prohibited “network exclusivity” arrangements between financial institutions and networks and 3. Gave more control to merchant over routing debit card transactions
• Fair Credit Billing Act: Implemented by Regulation Z, the law limits liability on stolen cards to $50 and if the loss is reported before card is used, you’re not responsible for charges
• Card Associations: make modifications to rules and processes twice a year
Error Resolution
Regulation Z (Truth in Lending Act)• Under 12 C.F.R.S1026.13(a): Issuers must investigate and
resolve certain billing errors• The appearance on a periodic statement of a purchase when
the consumer refused to take delivery of the goods because the goods did not comply with the contract;
• Delivery of property or services different from that agreed upon;
• Delivery of the wrong quantity; • Late delivery; or• Delivery to the wrong location• The error does NOT apply to dispute relating to quality of
goods and or services where consumer accepts
Error Resolution
Regulation E: Rules established by federal banking regulators carrying out Electronic Fund Transfer Act, providing consumer rights when cardholder uses banks electronic funds transfer system, used by financial institutions to generate debit card transactions. It provides the protections for cardholders using debit cards
Error Resolution
Regulation Terms
Access Device: A Card, code or other means of account access used by a consumer to initiate electronic funds transfer
Pre-Authorized Electronic Fund Transfer: An electronic fund transfer authorized in advance to recur at substantially regular intervals (authenticated by consumer)
Error ResolutionTiming of Consumer Notice to Financial Institutions
Maximum Liability
Within 2 business days of learning of loss or theft
Lesser of $50 or total amount of unauthorized transfers
More than two business days after learning of loss or theft up to 60 days after transmittal of statement showing first unauthorized transfer made with access device
Lesser of $500 or the sum of:1. $50 or the total amount of
unauthorized transfers occurring in the first 2 business days, which is less, and
2. The amount of unauthorized transfers occurring after the 2 business days and before notice to the financial institution
Error ResolutionEvent Timing of Consumer Notice to
Financial InstitutionsMaximum Liability
Loss or theft of access device
More than 60 calendar days after transmittal of statement showing first unauthorized transfer made with access device
For transfers occurring within the 60-day period, the lesser of $500 or the sum of: 1. The lesser of $50 or amount
of unauthorized transfers in the first two business days whichever is less, and
2. The amount of unauthorized transfers occurring after two business days
For transfers occurring after the 60-day period, unlimited liability (until the financial institution is notified).
Unauthorized transfer (s) not involving the loss or theft of an access device
Within 60 calendar days after transmittalof the periodic statement on which the unauthorized transfer first appears
No liability
Error Resolution
DO NOT
Share
your PIN #
DEBIT
Family member given access to use debit card and misuses or abuses account, if given the PIN #, transaction is not considered unauthorized use.
Error Resolution
Visa states provisional credit within 5 business days of notification, but FI may withhold provisional credit to extend allowed under applicable law
• Prepaid cards
• Debit cards (consumer and commercial)
• Credit Cards (consumer and commercial)
Mastercard provides no suggested guideline, therefore Mastercard issuers should follow Reg E and other applicable Regs
Error Resolution
Chargeback Rights Do Not Apply
• Violation of card brand regulations occurred.
• Violation not covered by chargeback rights.
• Member experienced financial loss because of violation.
Error Resolution
• MasterCard, Visa, American Express and Discover are eliminating the need to sign receipts for credit and debit sales April 14th
• Merchants in U.S. decide whether or not to require signatures
• Visa requires merchants to either have EMV chip or contactless chip-enabled readers to opt out of signatures
• Fraud capabilities have enhanced greatly• Checkout process more streamlined• Multi-factor authentication is not accomplished with
signatures
Managing Disputes Fallback Transactions
• ”Dipping” your card, rather than sliding card through card reader.
– Card Reader is unable to readcard when inserted, after second attempt, card falls back to swiped for authorization.
Managing DisputesFallback Transactions
• In-store fallback transactions (excluding manual key entry)
Appropriate indicators identifying fallback
Issuer bears liability if approved
AFD fallback transaction
Appropriate indicators identifying fallback
Issuer bears liability if approved
Except for lost-stolen Visa transactions
• Manual Key Entry: Merchant is liable for fraudulent transaction
Managing DisputesFallback Transactions
Enable better fallback monitoring Turn off Fallback Capability/Decline except in
urgent cases ATM’s must improve software and terminal
configurations Block all magnetic fallback transactions on ATM Non-Member/Non-Customer block all magnetic
fallback authorizations Block all Key-Entered fallback authorizations
across all devices and cards
Managing Disputes Fallback Transactions
Adopt EMV on 100% debit cards, credit cards, in branch POS and ATM’s
Once 100% EMV issued cards, block fallback magnetic transactions
Block Fallback Transactions outside of state footprint
Block Fallback Transactions at the pump
Block Fallback Transactions in excess of $ amount
Managing Disputes Fallback Transactions
Visa Claims Resolution : A Global Solution
• Merchant response 30 days
• Certain Chargebacks Rejected
• Two Workflows for all Chargebacks
• 22 Reason Codes into 4 dispute categories
• Issuer response 120 days
• Merchant ONLY fraud and authorization with Compelling evidence
Managing DisputesFallback Transactions
Old Term New Term
Chargeback (CB)RepresentmentCB ReversalRepresentment
DisputeDispute ResponseDispute ReversalDispute Response Reversal
Managing DisputesFallback Transactions
Fraud Authorization Processing Errors Consumer Disputes 35 CNP Transactions One Account Workflow stops invalid CB responses from
Merchants Shorter timeframes for dispute resolution Simplified dispute process due to fewer clearer
reason codes
Managing DisputesFallback Transactions
• High Risk Current Standard = 1,000 or more disputed transactions & 2% dispute to transactions ratio
• October, ratio reduced to 1.8% through 1,000 dispute count remaining
• Visa’s Fraud Monitoring Program• Current: $75,000 or more in fraudulent transactions
per month and fraud to sales volume ration of 1%• Revision: $75,000 threshold fraud sales volume ration
0.9%• Acquiring Banks 1% transaction to sales ration reduced
to 0.75%
Managing DisputesFallback Transactions
MasterCard Phase 1• October 12, 2018• 4831 Incorrect Transaction Amount• Point of Interaction Error• Cardholder Disputer• Cardholder Does Not Recognize
• Mastercard requires more information prior to filing chargeback, including evidence from cardholder.
Managing DisputesFallback Transactions
MasterCard Phase 2: April 12, 2019Issuers may submit CB, even if merchant initiates a return• Merchants should not fight CB and then issue refund to
resolve problem with customer directly
• Chargeback Filing Timeframe• 120 days to 90 days when 4834 Point of Interaction
Error• No longer valid 4840 Fraudulent Processing of
Transactions• No longer valid 4863 Cardholder Does Not Recognize
Managing DisputesFallback Transactions
MasterCard Phase 4: April 17, 2020
• 4837 Fraud
• 4853 Cardholder Disputer
• 4834 Point of Interaction Error
• Mastercard will no longer accept second chargebacks pertaining to these reason codes. They now require pre-arbitration response similar to Visa Claims Resolution.
Managing DisputesFallback Transactions
• Merchants must provide supporting documentation such as email conversations with customers, for reason code 4863 (Cardholder Does Not Recognize)https://www.mastercard.us/content/dam/mccom/en-us/documents/rules/chargeback-guide.pdf
2020: MDRI, Mastercard plans to eliminate arbitration chargeback cycle. Pre-arbitration will need to be filed for most disputes.
Managing DisputesFallback Transactions
April 12 change to Mastercard’s negative option billing process• MCC 5968 Subscription Merchant: Retailers
collecting information for start a trial, subscription services after trial, must obtain• Explicit permission prior to charging the card• Inform cardholders of total transaction amount, date of
transaction and merchant’s name on billing statements• Provide direct link to cancel service. • Trial period begins once sample is received• Customer’s requesting cancellation must receive written
confirmation subscription has been terminated
Managing DisputesFallback Transactions
12.613.1 12.7 13.1
15.4
16.7
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Million of U.S. Fraud Victims
Column1
Javelin Study and Research
Managing DisputesFallback Transactions
22.1
19.3
16.415.5
16.216.8
0
5
10
15
20
25
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Fraud Losses (U.S. billions of dollars)
Column1
Managing DisputesFallback Transactions
1. 2017, 6.64% of consumers victims of identity fraud. Existing non-card fraud and account takeover
2. Account takeover $5.1 billion, 120% increase from 2016
3. Online shopping greatest fraud opportunity. Card not present fraud is 81% more likely than POS fraud
4. Fraudsters are more sophisticated. 1.5 million victims existing account fraud, intermediary account opened under first name. 200% greater than previous numbers 2018 Identity Fraud Study
Educate Consumers Better Protection
1. Turn on two-factor authentication; use strong passwords2. Secure devices; secure online & mobile devices with
screen locks,encrypting data stored on device , avoid public Wi-Fi, install anti-malware
3. Place security freeze: Shut down and open when necessary
4. Account alerts 100%5. Alerts for online transactions, 3-D Secure (Verified by
Visa & SecureCode)
Questions?
Jennifer Stadler, CPP
Vice President Marketing, Strategy & Communications