26
Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware Michael L. Sganga, DPM Orthopedics New England Natick, MA

Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

Surgical Management of

Osteomyelitis & Infected

HardwareMichael L. Sganga, DPM

Orthopedics New England

Natick, MA

Page 2: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

Disclosures

• None relevant to the content of this

material

Page 3: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

Overview

• Implants

• Timing

• Tenants of Treatment

– Debridement

– Hardware: stability & removal• Exchange, Ex-fix, Ablative resection

– Abx: ID dealings

– Closure & Dead space

– Decision making

Page 4: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

Incidence & Type

• Trauma 2.5x more SSI than elective (Blam 2003)

• Incidence of infection: (Mouzopoulos 2011)

– Closed 1-2%

– Open up to 30%

• Open vs closed fx ankle ORIF

– 4x increased infection (SooHoo 2009)

Page 5: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

Elective Surgery

• Retrospective 7 yr

• 555 elective cases

• 3.1% incidence SSI

– Coag +/- Staph (71% cultures)

– 87% PCN or AMP resistant

Zgonis. J Foot Ankle Surg 2004; 43(2): 97–103.

Page 6: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

Implant Implications

• Innoculum

100,000x smaller

• Colonized implant

• Barrier to host

immune response

– Non-vascular space

• Biofilms

• Common Bugs1. Zimmerli Journal of Infectious Disease 146(4): 487-97. 1982

2. Trampuz Swiss Med Wkly 2005; 135:243-51

3. Trampuz Injury 2006; 37:S59-66

Joint

Replacement2 All Fractures3

Staph

aureus 12-23% 30%

Coag Neg

Staph 30-43% 22%

Gram Neg

Bacilli 3-6% 10%

Anaerobes2-4% 5%

Enterococci3-7% 3%

Streptococci9-10% 1%

Polymicrobial10-12% 27%

Unknown10-11% 2%

Page 7: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

Implants, What should I Use?

• Titanium better than stainless– (Melcher, Injury 27(S3). 1996)

• Solid better than cannulated– (Cordero, JBJS 78B. 1996)

• Smooth better than porous

– (Arens, JBJS 76B. 1994)

Page 8: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

Early Infection <2wksTiming is Everything

Page 9: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

Delayed 2-10wks

Page 10: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

Late >10wks

• Colonized at time of

surgery

• Hematogenous

seeding:

• Non-articular

hardware 7%

Page 11: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

When Things Go Wrong

• Primary objectives:– Eliminate infection

– Promote osseous union

– Optimize function

– Keep in mind objectives of intended

original procedure (IOP)

• Treatment merges:– Antimicrobial therapy

– Surgical management: debridement, deadspace, soft tissue

– Osseous stabilization

Page 12: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

5 Foundations of Treatment

1. Identify organism

2. Excise nonviable tissueOncologic resection

3. Stability

4. Control infection: culture-driven

5. Soft tissue & dead space management

Page 13: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

Identify Organism

• Debridement & Irrigate (9L)

• Procure cultures

– Histopath, micro: bone & tissue

– 2 samples from each site

• 2 weeks off abx is best

• HW culture or sonication if removed

– Have lab hold cultures for 2 weeks

• Sinus unreliable

Page 14: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

My Set-up

Page 15: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

Debridement

• 3 scenarios:

1. Large defect & unstable implant

2. Healed bone, stable after implant removal

3. Bone is not healed, implant stable

• Assess intra-op stability of bone &

hardware

Page 16: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk
Page 17: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

Importance of Stability

• Unstable fractures more likely to develop infection– Compared infection rates of unfixated vs fixated fxs (Merritt 1987)

• Stable fixation better than unstable fixation in osteomyelitis prevention

– Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk of infection of stable fixation (Worlock 1994)

• Fracture healing can proceed “normally” with rigid fixation– No difference in time to union b/w infected & uninfected fxs with rigid fixation

(Friedrich 1977)

• Why is 4-6 weeks is the “earliest” for implant removal – After soft callus formation→stability adequate to prevent shortening

(Sarmiento 1995)

Page 18: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

When to Keep Hardware

• 68-86% success with HW retention

• Infection <3 wks

• No sinus or abscess

• Pathogen is sensitive

• Stability is key at this point

Page 19: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

When to Cut Losses

• Difficult to treat organisms

• Unstable hardware/union site

• Large bone defect

• Implant >4wks

– stability

• Sinus tract

Difficult to Treat Organisms

Rifampin resistant staphylococcus

Small-colony variant staphyloccus

Enterococci

Quinolone-resistant Pseudomonas

aeruginosa

Candida

Multidrug resistant organisms

Page 20: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

Dead Space

Page 21: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

Antibiotic Cement

Local antibiotic delivery

Concentrations >200x IV

Low systemic toxicity

Absorbable cement can be used as well

w/out need for removal

Page 22: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

Getting it Closed

• VAC, STSG, HW removal, Primary closure

• Synthetic/Amnion grafts

• Plastics: Flaps

• Vascular: Amp

Page 23: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

Chronic Osteomyelitis

• Inadequately treated acute infection

• Late problem of open fracture

• Soft tissue spread

– Immunosuppressed

– Malnourished, DM, HIV

• Sinus tract

– Send for biopsy

• ?SCC

Page 24: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

Take-Home Principles

• Patients with early wound drainage

– I and D with intra-operative culture

– Keep implants

– Culture specific antibiotics

– Get it healed & closed

• Can get wound healing and fracture

healing in setting of infection

Page 25: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

Who’s the Boss?

• IDSA: The ultimate decision regarding

surgical management should be made by

the surgeon with appropriate consultation

(eg, infectious diseases, plastic surgery)

as necessary

Page 26: Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware APMA 7-2017 - FINAL DRAFT .pdf · osteomyelitis prevention – Staph inoculated fixation, unstable fixation double the risk

Thank

You!Questi

ons?

Michael L. Sganga, DPM

[email protected]