14
NBER Market Design | October 20, 2017 E. Glen Weyl Microsoft Research & Yale Surge Pricing Solves the Wild Goose Chase Joint with 2017 Meetings NBER Market Design Working Group Juan Camilo Castillo Stanford University Dan Knoepfle Uber

Surge Market Design

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Surge Market Design

NBER Market Design | October 20, 2017

E. Glen WeylMicrosoft Research & Yale

Surge Pricing Solves the Wild Goose ChaseJoint with

2017 MeetingsNBER Market Design Working Group

Juan Camilo CastilloStanford University

Dan KnoepfleUber

Page 2: Surge Market Design

Castillo, Knoepfle and Weyl | NBER Market Design | October 20, 20172

Ride-hailing: powerful but fragile

Page 3: Surge Market Design

Castillo, Knoepfle and Weyl | NBER Market Design | October 20, 20173

Wild goose chases (WGCs) and Vickrey’s hypercongestion

Page 4: Surge Market Design

Castillo, Knoepfle and Weyl | NBER Market Design | October 20, 20174

Vickrey’s “responsive pricing”/Uber’s surge pricing as response

Page 5: Surge Market Design

Castillo, Knoepfle and Weyl | NBER Market Design | October 20, 20175

Plan for talk

I. Describe modelII. Theoretical illustration of

mechanismIII. Empirical illustrationIV. Welfare calibration and

the costs of rigid pricing

Page 6: Surge Market Design

Castillo, Knoepfle and Weyl | NBER Market Design | October 20, 20176

Main model features

• Homogeneous space• Arbitrary topology (empirically measured)• Driver supply driven by anticipated earnings per

unit time• Riders care both about wait, price• Cars can be Idle, Delivering, or En Route• Time spent En Route =waiting time 𝑇 𝐼 based on

idle cars available (relative to demand)

Page 7: Surge Market Design

Castillo, Knoepfle and Weyl | NBER Market Design | October 20, 20177

Backward-bending “supply”

Page 8: Surge Market Design

Castillo, Knoepfle and Weyl | NBER Market Design | October 20, 20178

Empirical analog

• Manhattan, December 2016-February 2017• Observations: one 30-minute period

Page 9: Surge Market Design

Castillo, Knoepfle and Weyl | NBER Market Design | October 20, 20179

Calibration implies breakdown at slack≡ 𝑰𝒅𝒍𝒆

𝑬𝒏𝑹𝒐𝒖𝒕𝒆≈. 𝟐𝟓−. 𝟓

Page 10: Surge Market Design

Castillo, Knoepfle and Weyl | NBER Market Design | October 20, 201710

Surge pricing appears to be mostly about this

Page 11: Surge Market Design

Castillo, Knoepfle and Weyl | NBER Market Design | October 20, 201711

Welfare calibration

• Max waiting time only time effect on demand• Willingness-to-wait orthogonal to willingness-to-

pay• Pareto log-normal distribution of WTP, log-normal

WTW, calibrate to other estimates• Constant elasticity labor supply, calibrated to

other Uber papers• Space dynamics calibrated to time-distance data• Busiest and calmest hours of the week• 20% extraction

Page 12: Surge Market Design

Castillo, Knoepfle and Weyl | NBER Market Design | October 20, 201712

Flexible pricing in street hail v.app-based hailing:92nd v. 58th percentile

Page 13: Surge Market Design

Castillo, Knoepfle and Weyl | NBER Market Design | October 20, 201713

Other solutions

• Rider queue• Maximum dispatch radius

Can help, but brand promise, lightly used• Re-matching, forward dispatch more consistent

Page 14: Surge Market Design

Castillo, Knoepfle and Weyl | NBER Market Design | October 20, 201714

Discussion

• Natural monopoly and regulation• Regulation motive stronger with pool• Idle car externality and free riding by competition• Road congestion externalities

For future research:• Spatial and temporal dynamics (JC)• Integrating with traffic congestion• Explicit competition