5

Click here to load reader

Surface tension of silane treated natural zeolite

  • Upload
    jy-lee

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Surface tension of silane treated natural zeolite

Surface tension of silane treated natural zeolite

J.Y. Leea, S.H. Leeb, S.W. Kima,*

aDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The University of Seoul, 90 Jeonnong-Dong, Dongdaemun-Gu, Seoul, 130-743, South KoreabDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Anyang University, 708-113 Anyang 5-Dong, Manan-Gu, Anyang City, Kyungki-Do 430-714, South Korea

Received 14 May 1999; received in revised form 30 September 1999; accepted 20 October 1999

Abstract

To investigate the surface tension of the natural zeolite to be used in polymer composites, wicking method was employed on the base of

Washburn's equation and that of the zeolite treated with 0.5 wt.% -aminopropyltriethoxysilane ( -APS) was also studied and compared.

The apolar component LWSV of the untreated natural zeolite was 19.22 mJ/m2 and the polar one, AB

SV was 15.27 mJ/m2. The polar component

LWSV of the treated zeolite with 0.5 wt.% -APS was 27.08 mJ/m2 and the polar one AB

SV was 12.23 mJ/m2. The value of LWSV component

increased, while that of ABSV component decreased with -APS treatment and it was due to the increasing effect of alkyl group

(hydrophobic) in -APS coupled on the zeolite surface. # 2000 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Natural zeolite; Surface tension; Silane coupling agent; Wicking method

1. Introduction

Many researchers have investigated to characterize the

surface of clay minerals and polymer matrix, and the inter-

face between them in order to use the clay minerals as

inorganic ®llers in polymer composite, paint, cosmetic, etc.,

and they have found that the surface of solid materials are

divided into two categories [1±4]. One is hydrophilic solid

whose surface tension is high and the other is hydrophobic

solid whose surface tension is low [5±7]. To facilitate the

adhesion of two different materials, the apolar surface

should be modi®ed into a high-energy polar surface or

the polar surface should be changed to apolar surface by

a number of modifying methods. So, the information about

solid surface tension is very important for better insight in

the processes occurring at the interfaces, both in pure and

applied science.

To get the surface characteristics of solids, the contact

angle method has been used. When a liquid drop is put on the

solid surface at equilibrium as shown in Fig. 1, the interfacial

tensions of solid/liquid, SL solid/vapor, SV, and liquid

vapor, LV are expressed by the following Young's equation

[8±11].

LVcos� � SLÿ SV (1)

where, � is contact angle. However, the contact angle for a

particle can't be measured by the same method in Fig. 1. To

get the contact angle formed between a liquid and a fine

powder, column wicking method is used at constant tem-

perature by determining the rate of penetration of probe

liquids (usually methylene iodide, water and formamide)

through the packed beds of the powder, using the following

Washburn's equation [8,11].

h2 � tR LVcos�

2�(2)

where, h(cm) is the penetrated distance of the probe liquid in

a selected time t(sec), R(cm) is the effective interstitial pore

radius between the packed particles in column and �(cP) is

the viscosity of the probe liquid.

Eq. (2) has a fundamental dif®culty that there are two

unknowns (R and cos�). So, R should be ascertained inde-

pendently before determining the cos� and this dif®culty can

be easily solved by using the spreading liquids which can

completely wet the solid surface, so that the contact angle

� � 0, that is cos� � 1. Generally, n-alkanes are used as

spreading liquids and Eq. (2) can be changed as follows

[2,8].

R � 2�h2=t

LV

(3)

After ascertaining the value of R, the contact angle for each

probe liquid with the solid powder is calculated via Eq. (2)

and the surface tension can be determined.

Inorganic materials of many species such as silica, alu-

mina, talc, mica, etc. have been investigated to characterize

Materials Chemistry and Physics 63 (2000) 251±255

* Corresponding author. Tel.: �82-2-2210-2447; fax: �82-2210-2310.

E-mail address: [email protected] (S.W. Kim).

0254-0584/00/$ ± see front matter # 2000 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.

PII: S 0 2 5 4 - 0 5 8 4 ( 9 9 ) 0 0 2 3 1 - X

Page 2: Surface tension of silane treated natural zeolite

the surface tension, however, we can ®nd few papers

concerned with natural zeolite. In this study, the surface

tension of a natural zeolite was studied to use as an inorganic

®ller in epoxy composites [12]. It is well-known that zeolite

are crystalline aluminosilicate minerals whose surface

areas are so high due to the channels and pores in which

metal ions are located [13±15]. To improve the wettability

between the epoxy matrix and the inorganic ®ller, the

natural zeolite was treated with silane coupling agent and

the effect of silane treatment on the surface characteristics

was investigated.

2. Experiment

The natural zeolite from Kampo area in Korea was found

to be a clinoptilolite type zeolite whose average particle size

was 9.89 mm. -aminopropyltriethoxysilane (A-1100, -

APS) was supplied by Union Carbide and the formulation

was

H2Nÿ�CH2�3ÿSiÿ�OC2H5�3� ÿaminopropyltriethoxysilane�

The silane treatment process of the natural zeolite was as

follows. 0.5 wt.% silane coupling agent to the natural zeolite

was hydrolyzed in the mixture of ethanol/water � 95/5

(vol%) for 15 min at room temperature, and then the natural

zeolite was treated with the hydrolyzed solutions for 30 min

at 508C and dried for 24 h at 1208C. The dried zeolite was

ground and sieved into 325 mesh under. They were stored at

desiccator to prevent water molecules from being adsorbed.

The sample was analyzed by FT-IR spectroscopy at a

resolution of 2 cmÿ1 from 4000 cmÿ1 to 400 cmÿ1.

Column wicking experiment was carried out in the

following manner. Glass tube with 100 mm long and

9 mm diameter was plugged at the bottom with a small

wad of cotton wool. 3 g of well-dried zeolite powder was

®lled into the tube with the packing height of 7 cm by means

of a hypodermic syringe. The packed zeolite was wicked

with n-hexane to promote further settling and the tube was

vertically placed in an oven at 1108C overnight to remove

the hexane. Wicking was done with n-alkanes (hexane,

heptane, octane and decane), methylene iodide, water and

formamide at 208C, and the penetration rates of the liquids

were measured.

3. Results and discussion

Fig. 2 shows the penetrated distances squared, h2 as a

function of time, t for untreated natural zeolite wicked with

a series of n-alkanes. The linear relationship between h2 and

t in Eq. (2) should go precisely through the origin. However,

all lines do not so in practice, and it would appear in most

cases owing to various hydrodynamic disturbances at the

moment of immersion [8]. So, the best approach is to make a

plot of h2 versus t as shows in Fig. 2.

n-Alkanes are known as spreading liquids whose contact

angles with a solid surface is � � 0, that is cos� � 1. To

determine the value of R, the surface tension components,

LV and the viscosities, � of n-alkanes in Table 1 are joined

to Eq. (3) and the relationships between 2�h2/t and LV are

displayed in Fig. 3. This shows the straight line and the value

of R is obtained from the slope, which is 6.10 � 10ÿ5 cm.

The contact angles between the untreated natural zeolite

and the probe liquids in Eq. (2) are obtained from each slope

of the straight line in Fig. 4 by joining the value of R and the

data of Table 2. The contact angles for methylene iodide,

water and formamide are � � 76.78, 68.88 and 54.28, respec-

tively.

The relationships between 2�h2/t and LV for the liquids

(nonspreading liquids) are compared with those of n-

alkanes in Fig. 3 and they fail to meet with the straight

line of the spreading n-alkanes. So, it is found that only

Fig. 1. Contact angles between liquid and solid surface.

Fig. 2. Plots of h2 versus t obtained by wicking with n-alkanes on the

untreated natural zeolite.

Table 1

Viscosity, LV, LWLV , �LV and ÿLV of n-Alkanes at 208C [8]

n-Alkanes � (cP) LV LWLV AB

LV �LV ÿLV

(mJ/m2) (mJ/m2) (mJ/m2) (mJ/m2) (mJ/m2)

n-Hexane 0.326 18.4 18.4 0 0 0

n-Heptane 0.409 20.1 20.1 0 0 0

n-Octane 0.542 21.6 21.6 0 0 0

n-Decane 0.907 23.8 23.8 0 0 0

252 J.Y. Lee et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 63 (2000) 251±255

Page 3: Surface tension of silane treated natural zeolite

spreading liquids must be used to determine the value of R

and it is due that the spreading liquids appear to pre-wet the

solid surfaces over which they are subsequently spreading

[8].

It has been well-known that the surface tension of a solid,

SV consists of Lifshitz-van der Waals component, LWSV for

apolar and the Lewis acid-base component, ABSV for polar.

The Lewis acid component, �SV acts as an electron acceptor

site and the Lewis base component, ÿSV is electron donor

site [9,11]. To get the values of these components, the values

of the probe liquids in Table 2 were applied to Eq. (4) [9].

Methylene iodide was used as a probe liquid to determine

the LWSV component of the zeolite surface tension, and water

and formamide were for �SV and ÿSV components.

LV�1� cos�� � 2

� �������������������� LW

SV � LWLV

q�

������������������ �SV � ÿLV

q�

������������������ ÿSV � �LV

q �(4)

Using the contact angle � � 76.78, LWLV , �LV and ÿLV for

methylene iodide in Table 2, LWSV � 19.22 mJ/m2 was cal-

culated from Eq. (4). To determine �SV and ÿSV values, two

equations from Eq. (4) for water and formamide were

rewritten and the solutions of the equations were

�SV � 4.28 mJ/m2 and ÿSV � 13.63 mJ/m2. The polar com-

ponent, ABSV is 15.27 mJ/m2 obtained from Eq. (5) and the

total surface tension is calculated from Eq. (6) and it is

34.49 mJ/m2.

ABSV � 2

������� �SV

q ������� ÿSV

p(5)

SV � LWSV � AB

SV (6)

The apolar component is a little larger than the polar and this

means that the characterization of the untreated natural

zeolite surface is some hydrophobic. It is interesting that

this result is different from the general surface character-

istics of zeolites whose surface is hydrophilic due to the

hydroxyl groups located on the surface of the zeolite in the

form of Al-OH, Si-OH, etc. This result may be attributable

to the decomposition of the zeolite structure by grinding.

Work of adhesion between solid and liquid was proposed

by Dupre as follows [16].

WSL � SV � LVÿ SL (7)

Combining Eqs. (1) and (7), we can get the well-known

Young±Dupre equation [16] and the work of adhesion

between the untreated natural zeolite and the probe liquids

is calculated.

WSL � LV�1� cos�� (8)

Those values of WSL for water and formamide (polar

liquids) are 99.13 mJ/m2 and 91.93 mJ/m2 and that for

methylene iodide (apolar liquid) is 62.49 mJ/m2.

Fig. 5 shows the penetrated distances squared, h2 as a

function of time, t obtained by wicking of a series of n-

alkanes on 0.5 wt.% -APS treated natural zeolite. The

slopes for all n-alkanes are wholly decreased compared

with those of untreated natural zeolite and the trend of

slope is similar. The values of Table 1 are joined to Eq. (3) to

determine the value of R and the relationships between 2�h2/

t and LV are displayed in Fig. 6. The value of R calculated

from the slope is 3.72 � 10ÿ5 cm.

Fig. 3. 2�h2/t versus LV for wicking with n-alkanes and probe liquids on

the untreated natural zeolite.

Fig. 4. Plots of h2 versus t obtained by wicking with probe liquids on the

untreated natural zeolite.

Table 2

Viscosity, LV, LWLV , �LV and ÿLV of probe liquids at 208C [8]

Probe liquids � (cP) LV LWLV AB

LV �LV ÿLV

(mJ/m2) (mJ/m2) (mJ/m2) (mJ/m2) (mJ/m2)

Methylene iodide 2.80 50.8 50.8 0 0 0

Water 1.00 72.8 21.8 51.0 25.5 25.5

Formamide 4.55 58.0 39.0 19.0 2.28 39.6

J.Y. Lee et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 63 (2000) 251±255 253

Page 4: Surface tension of silane treated natural zeolite

To get the contact angles between the 0.5 wt.% -APS

treated natural zeolite and the probe liquids by using Eq. (2),

each slope of the straight line in Fig. 7 are joined to R value

and the data in Table 2. The contact angles for methylene

iodide, water and formamide are � � 62.68, 68.48 and 64.28,respectively.

By introducing the contact angle � � 62.68, LWLV , �LV and

ÿLV of methylene iodide on Table 2, to Eq. (4), the apolar

component, LWLV �27.08 mJ/m2 was obtained and the polar

components, �SV � 4.12 mJ/m2 and ÿSV � 9.09 mJ/m2

were also obtained from Table 2 and Eq. (4). By substituting

the value of �SV and ÿSV to Eq. (5), ABSV � 12.23 mJ/m2 was

obtained and the total surface tension, SV � 39.31 mJ/m2 is

calculated from Eq. (6). The apolar component is 2.2 times

as large as the polar component and this means that the

characterization of the surface of 0.5 wt.% -APS treated

natural zeolite is hydrophobic. Work of adhesion, WSL for

water and formamide (polar liquids) are 99.60 mJ/m2 and

83.24 mJ/m2 and that for methylene iodide (apolar liquid) is

74.18 mJ/m2.

The surface tension components for the zeolite are put

together on Table 3. The value of LWSV component increased,

while that of ABSV component decreased with -APS treat-

ment. It is due to that the surface of the zeolite is more

affected by alkyl group (hydrophobic) than amine or hydro-

xyl groups (hydrophilic) as shown in Fig. 8.

Fig. 8A shows the FT-IR spectra of the natural zeolite.

The strongest vibrations in the range of 1294±837 cmÿ1 are

for the internal tetrahedron symmetric stretch of Si (or Al)-

O. The Si (or Al)-O bending appears at 474.1 cmÿ1 and the

band of 525.4 cmÿ1 is related to the presence of the double

rings in the framework structures. The band of H2O bending

is observed at 1635 cmÿ1, the band of hydrogen-bonded OH

is shown at 3453.2 cmÿ1 and the sharp band of isolated OH

is shown at 3645.5 cmÿ1. The effect of -APS treatment is

shown in Fig. 8B. The characteristic peaks mentioned above

are similar in two spectra, however, the new bands appeared

at 3187 cmÿ1 and 1697 cmÿ1 which are related to the

presence of amine groups in -APS. Therefore, it was found

that the surface of the zeolite is coupled with -APS, so the

surface tension was affected by alkyl group and amine or

hydroxyl groups explained above.

Fig. 5. Plots of h2 versus t obtained by wicking with n-alkanes on the

natural zeolite treated with 0.5 wt.% -APS.

Fig. 6. 2�h2/t versus LV for wicking with n-alkanes and probe liquids on

natural zeolite treated with 0.5 wt.% -APS.

Fig. 7. Plots of h2 versus t obtained by wicking with probe liquids on

natural zeolite treated with 0.5 wt.% -APS.

Table 3

Surface, tension components for the natural zeolite at 208C

Samples LV LWLV AB

LV �LV ÿLV

(mJ/m2) (mJ/m2) (mJ/m2) (mJ/m2) (mJ/m2)

Untreated zeolite 34.49 19.22 15.27 4.28 13.63

-APS treated zeolite 39.31 27.08 12.23 4.12 9.09

254 J.Y. Lee et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 63 (2000) 251±255

Page 5: Surface tension of silane treated natural zeolite

4. Conclusions

The effects of -APS treatment on the surface tension

of the natural zeolite used for polymer composites

were studied by wicking method using the Washburn's

equation. The components of surface tension for the

natural zeolite were LWSV � 19.22 mJ/m2, �SV � 4.28 mJ/

m2, ÿSV � 13.63 mJ/m2, ABSV � 15.27 mJ/m2 and SV �

34.49 mJ/m2. Those for the -APS treated zeolite were

LWSV � 27.08 mJ/m2, �SV � 4.12 mJ/m2, ÿSV � 9.09 mJ/

m2, ABSV � 12.23 mJ/m2 and SV � 39.31 mJ/m2. The

value of LWSV component increased, while that of AB

SV

component decreased with -APS treatment. It was due

to that the surface of the zeolite was more affected by alkyl

group (hydrophobic) than amine or hydroxyl groups (hydro-

philic).

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Jeong Moon Information Co.

Ltd. and Keuk Dong Design & Communication Co. Ltd. in

Korea.

References

[1] H. Malandrini, F. Clauss, S. Partyka, J.M. Douillard, J. Colloid

Interface Sci. 194 (1997) 183.

[2] A. Ontiveros-Ortega, M. Espinosa-Jim nez, E. Chibowski, F. Gonz

lez-Caballero, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 202 (1998) 189.

[3] G. Fourche, Polym. Eng. Sci. 35 (1995) 957.

[4] W. Wu, R.F Giese Jr., C.J. Van Oss, Powder Tech. 89 (1996) 129.

[5] E. Chibowski, J. Adhesion Sci. Tech. 6 (1992) 1069.

[6] C.J. Wu, C.Y. Chen, E. Woo, J.F. Kuo, J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym.

Chem. 31 (1993) 3405.

[7] J.S. Shukla, S.C. Tewari, G.K. Sharma, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 34

(1987) 191.

[8] C.J. Van Oss, R.F. Giese, Z. Li, K. Murphy, J. Norris, M.K.

Chaudhury, R.J. Good, in: K.L. Mittal (Ed.), Contact Angle,

Wettability and Adhesion, VSP, 1993, p. 269.

[9] R.J. Good, in: K.L. Mittal, (Ed.), Contact Angle, Wettability and

Adhesion, VSP, 1993, p. 3.

[10] M. Salou, S. Yamazaki, N. Nishimiya, K. Tsutsumi, Colloids

Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 139 (1998) 299.

[11] E. Chibowski, in: K.L. Mittal (Ed.), Contact Angle, Wettability and

Adhesion, VSP, 1993, p. 64.

[12] J.Y. Lee, M.J. Shim, S.W. Kim, Mater. Chem. Phys. 48 (1997) 36.

[13] H.K. Lee, M.J. Shim, J.S. Lee, S.W. Kim, Mater. Phys. 44 (1996) 79.

[14] B.C. Lee, C.H. Cho, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 4 (1998) 298.

[15] J.R. Sohn, J.H. Park, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 4 (1998) 308.

[16] M.E. Schrader, Langmuir 12 (1996) 3728.

Fig. 8. FT-IR spectra of natural zeolite untreated (A) and treated (B) with 0.5 wt.% -Aps.

J.Y. Lee et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 63 (2000) 251±255 255