11
1 Supreme Court judgment in the case of Cheshire West Niall Fry MCA-DoLS Policy Lead, DH [email protected] Care Providers Alliance event Tuesday 28 October 2014

Supreme Court judgment in the case of Cheshire West

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Supreme Court judgment in the case of Cheshire West. Care Providers Alliance event Tuesday 28 October 2014. Niall Fry MCA-DoLS Policy Lead, DH [email protected]. Supreme Court judgment - case one. Supreme Court judgment - case two. Supreme Court judgment - case three. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Supreme Court judgment in  the case of Cheshire West

1

Supreme Court judgment in the case of Cheshire West

Niall Fry

MCA-DoLS Policy Lead, DH

[email protected]

Care Providers Alliance event Tuesday 28 October 2014

Page 2: Supreme Court judgment in  the case of Cheshire West

2 Valuing every voice, respecting every right

Supreme Court judgment- case one

Page 3: Supreme Court judgment in  the case of Cheshire West

3 Valuing every voice, respecting every right

Supreme Court judgment- case two

Page 4: Supreme Court judgment in  the case of Cheshire West

4 Valuing every voice, respecting every right

Supreme Court judgment- case three

Page 5: Supreme Court judgment in  the case of Cheshire West

5 Valuing every voice, respecting every right

Supreme Court judgment- acid test

Page 6: Supreme Court judgment in  the case of Cheshire West

6 Valuing every voice, respecting every right

Supreme Court judgment- not relevant considerations

Page 7: Supreme Court judgment in  the case of Cheshire West

7 Valuing every voice, respecting every right

DH View

• Welcome the judgment w.r.t. its re-statement of the universal nature of human rights – afforded to all on an equal basis

• Recognise this means a significant increase on the numbers now considered to be DoL – HSCIC data shows this

• Compliance won’t occur overnight (ADASS and CQC agree), but must have a plan in place – do nothing not acceptable

• In particular, “bulk assessments” not appropriate – must maintain the individual scrutiny

Page 8: Supreme Court judgment in  the case of Cheshire West

8

DH View cont.

• Needs to be an MCA-centred response

• First step should always be, can restrictions be eased to prevent a DoL from occurring?

• Prioritise and risk assess

• Don’t hold back applications

Valuing every voice, respecting ever right

Page 9: Supreme Court judgment in  the case of Cheshire West

9

Longer term solution

• Law Commission to fundamentally review legislation – for DoLS and for “community settings”. Aiming for a system that achieves right balance between protecting rights and reducing administrative burdens – integration into normal care planning process will be important

Valuing every voice, respecting every right

Page 10: Supreme Court judgment in  the case of Cheshire West

10

Shorter term

• Court of Protection is almost ready to launch its new streamlined system – will allow paper applications for “simple” cases

• DoLS standard forms being revised and updated case law guidance produced

Valuing every right, respecting every right

Page 11: Supreme Court judgment in  the case of Cheshire West

11

Concluding thoughts

• An opportunity but certainly a challenge

• MCA centred response essential

• Keen to hear your major concerns, thoughts for any short-term solutions – to feed into future planning

Valuing every right, respecting every right