TEMPLATE DESIGN © 2008 www.PosterPresentations.com Supporting Software Development Process Using Evolution Analysis Samaneh Bayat Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada [email protected] Overview Computing History Recent Approaches Diagram Differencing References Discussion OPTIONAL LOGO HERE Motivation Early Approaches Model Differencing Code Differencing Design Differencing Framework Usage Changes Systematic Code Changes [1] Susan Horwitz. Identifying the semantic and textual differences between two versions of a program. In PLDI ’90: Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 1990 conference on Programming language design and implementation, pages 234–245, New York, NY, USA, 1990. ACM. [2] Dirk Ohst, Michael Welle, and Udo Kelter. Differences between versions of UML diagrams. In ESEC/FSE-11: Proceedings of the 9th European software engineering conference held jointly with 11 th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering, pages 227–236, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM. [3] Zhenchang Xing and Eleni Stroulia. Umldiff: an algorithm for object-oriented design differencing. In ASE ’05: Proceedings of the 20 th IEEE/ACM international Conference on automated software engineering, pages 54–65, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM. [4] Thorsten Schafer, Jan Jonas, and Mira Mezini. Mining framework usage changes from instantiation code. In ICSE ’08: Proceedings of the 30 th international conference on Software engineering, pages 471–480, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. [5] Miryung Kim and David Notkin. Discovering and representing systematic code changes. In ICSE ’09: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE 31 st International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 309–319, Washington, DC, USA, 2009. IEEE

Supporting Software Development Process Using Evolution Analysis

Download PPTX Report

Upload
yadid
View
22
Download
0

Tags:

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Supporting Software Development Process Using Evolution Analysis Samaneh Bayat Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada [email protected]. OPTIONAL LOGO HERE. Overview. Recent Approaches. Systematic Code Changes. Model Differencing. Diagram Differencing. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Supporting Software Development Process Using Evolution Analysis

www.PosterPresentations.com

Supporting Software Development Process Using Evolution AnalysisSamaneh Bayat

Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, [email protected]

Overview

Computing History

Recent Approaches

Diagram Differencing

References

Discussion

OPTIONALLOGO HERE

Motivation

Early Approaches

Model Differencing

Code Differencing

Design Differencing

Framework Usage Changes

Systematic Code Changes

[1] Susan Horwitz. Identifying the semantic and textual differences between two versions of a program. In PLDI ’90: Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 1990 conference on Programming language design and implementation, pages 234–245, New York, NY, USA, 1990. ACM.[2] Dirk Ohst, Michael Welle, and Udo Kelter. Differences between versions of UML diagrams. In ESEC/FSE-11: Proceedings of the 9th European software engineering conference held jointly with 11th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering, pages 227–236, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM.[3] Zhenchang Xing and Eleni Stroulia. Umldiff: an algorithm for object-oriented design differencing. In ASE ’05: Proceedings of the 20th IEEE/ACM international Conference on automated software engineering, pages 54–65, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM.[4] Thorsten Schafer, Jan Jonas, and Mira Mezini. Mining framework usage changes from instantiation code. In ICSE ’08: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Software engineering, pages 471–480, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.[5] Miryung Kim and David Notkin. Discovering and representing systematic code changes. In ICSE ’09: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE 31st International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 309–319, Washington, DC, USA, 2009. IEEE Computer Society.