Upload
tamarr
View
18
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
How to Present Planning Items in a Combat Direction System Annette Kaster, FGAN-FKIE, Werthhoven, Germany IST-036/RWS-005 Halden, Norway. Support concept for creation and use of doctrines. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
efs
UkENDo 1
Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics
Ergonomics and Information Systems KIE
Support concept for creation and use of doctrinesSupport concept for creation and use of doctrines
How to Present Planning Items in a Combat Direction SystemAnnette Kaster, FGAN-FKIE, Werthhoven, Germany
IST-036/RWS-005 Halden, Norway
efs
UkENDo 2
Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics
Ergonomics and Information Systems KIE
ContentContent
Ergonomic support concept for creation and use of marine doctrines
Prototype demonstration
Representation and visualisation issues
efs
UkENDo 3
Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics
Ergonomics and Information Systems KIE
target system: F124 Combat System (CS) T1
Configuration of SensorsConfiguration of Sensors
RAM a(Blk 0/1)
VLS Mk 41(24 SM-2, Blk IIIA, 32 ESSM)
RAM f(Blk 0/1)
andand Effectors Effectors
EW
Combat Direction System
LINKASuW
COMMS
NAVASW
AAWS
Smart-LAPAR
efs
UkENDo 4
Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics
Ergonomics and Information Systems KIE
Doctrines ...
... configure the system behaviour
... allow depending on situation data (tactical, technical, environmental)
a timely confirmation of weapon systems
a definition of essential parameter adjustments
=>considerable influence on system behaviour
... support the user in time-critical situations
... considerate mission situations (threat, geography, etc.)
... control a multitude of parameters (situation data ~ 27.000, operational parameters ~ 760)
situation dependent events „trigger“ doctrines
time dependent events „trigger“ „TimeTables“
T3
efs
UkENDo 5
Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics
Ergonomics and Information Systems KIE
Doctrines
structure:
Trigger -> Condition --> Action
ON .. -> IF ... --> THEN
Trigger/Condition: time, OperatorAction, any kind of events
Action: modification of values of operational parameters,
Operator Notification, Activation (De-) of doctrines
Example Doctrine: Air_Threat_Warning_Red• on ATW Shift• If ATW = RED• then Effector Params = ready• ON = "Check Chaff Course; Comms to plain,
weapons to state ready "
T3
efs
UkENDo 6
Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics
Ergonomics and Information Systems KIE
Doctrine developer:Creation of basic doctrines and time tables
Mission planner:Selection of doctrines
Determination of"Formal parameters"
user:Use of doctrines
PreparedDoctrine
Database
MissionDoctrine
Database
Mission
On
land
On
boar
dprocess:doctrine creation/ administration/ use
efs
UkENDo 7
Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics
Ergonomics and Information Systems KIE
Doctrine database
Main control unit
• system-parameter
• notification
Situational data
Inference engine
trigger
doctrines
User interfaces:
visualisation of
situational data
(GIS/displays)
visualisation of situational parameters
(text/graphics/flow charts/
process diagrams)
monitoring and control of system parameter
time tables and doctrines
technical und tactical data and mission data
simulation control, monitoring and activation and deactivation of doctrines
• scenario• own ship data• cinematics• mission data• object relations
Doctrine editor
actions
DB management
time control
"UkENDo"-Demonstrator (architecture)
efs
UkENDo 8
Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics
Ergonomics and Information Systems KIE
Scenario
Hafenlinie12-Meilen-Zone
ADEX Start
ADEX Ende
Area Silkworm
Harm / Kormoran
>> HOSTILE / SUSPECT
EMCON Plan
automatic-iff-interrogation
IFF wartime ID codes
>> FAKER / JOKER
Radarsteuerung Hafengrenze 12-Meilen-Zone Vorbereitung ADEX Transit
Vorbereitung ADEX
MirageSea Harrier
SURFEX Start
SURFEX EndeTransit
efs
UkENDo 9
Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics
Ergonomics and Information Systems KIE
Scenario - Time Frame
LegendeAktivierung
Timetable
Group of Doctrines
Air Threat Warnings
Operation
Transit Yellow Phase ADEX Yellow Phase SurfEX Yellow Phase Transit Mission
Phase
270900 09001500 1800 2100 0300 0600 0900 1500 2100
290000 06001200
280000 1200 1800 0300
Ausführung
Set Sensor Parameter AAW
Set Effector Parameter AAW
Prep. Transit Yellow Phase
Transit START
Set Sensor Parameter AAW
Set Effector Parameter AAW
Prep. ADEX Yellow Phase
Set Sensor Parameter AAW
Set Effector Parameter AAW
Prep. SurfEX Yellow Phase
Set Sensor Parameter AAW
Set Effector Parameter AAW
ADEX START
Transit STOP
SurfEX START
SurfEX STOP
ADEX STOP
Mirage Threat
PA 200 Threat (Harm/Kom.)
Sea Harrier Threat
Entering Leaving Area Harbour
Starvanger
Entering Leaving Area 12 miles
EMCON
Firing Sequence
Entering Leaving SilkwormSubTimetable
Radar Mode Norm Short
Open Ocean Explorer UkENDo
efs
UkENDo 10
Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics
Ergonomics and Information Systems KIE
Doctrine database
Main control unit
• system-parameter
• notification
Situational data
Inference engine
trigger
doctrines
User interfaces:
visualisation of
situational data
(GIS/displays)
visualisation of situational parameters
(text/graphics/flow charts/
process diagrams)
monitoring and control of system parameter
time tables and doctrines
technical und tactical data and mission data
simulation control, monitoring and activation and deactivation of doctrines
• szenario• own ship data• cinematics• mission data• object relations
Doctrine editor
actions
DB management
time control
"UkENDo"-Demonstrator (architecture)
efs
UkENDo 11
Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics
Ergonomics and Information Systems KIE
Doctrine editor: ergonomical aspects
Uniformed structure of all forms for definition of doctrines/TT
user guided dialog task oriented handling reuse of components definition of rules components in the language of the user recurring elements for ergonomic consistency selective lists for consistent input reuse of rules user support by presettings (defaults, range of values, ...) graphical displays for formatted inputs explanation component modification of rules all the time automatic set-up of the rule base
Uniformed structure of all forms for definition of doctrines/TT
user guided dialog task oriented handling reuse of components definition of rules components in the language of the user recurring elements for ergonomic consistency selective lists for consistent input reuse of rules user support by presettings (defaults, range of values, ...) graphical displays for formatted inputs explanation component modification of rules all the time automatic set-up of the rule base
efs
UkENDo 12
Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics
Ergonomics and Information Systems KIE
Doctrine database: ergonomical aspects
Overview of the actual planning state different views for doctrines hierarchical representation of doctrines
TimeTable -> SubTimeTable -> Timed Action Doctrine-group -> doctrine -> Immediate Action
Fading in and out of hierarchical levels user guided dialog Context related representation Effective recherches
Overview of the actual planning state different views for doctrines hierarchical representation of doctrines
TimeTable -> SubTimeTable -> Timed Action Doctrine-group -> doctrine -> Immediate Action
Fading in and out of hierarchical levels user guided dialog Context related representation Effective recherches
efs
UkENDo 13
Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics
Ergonomics and Information Systems KIE
Bild Doktrinen-Editor
Doctrine editor:setup / structure / functionality
efs
UkENDo 14
Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics
Ergonomics and Information Systems KIE
Doctrine database:setup / structure / functionality
efs
UkENDo 15
Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics
Ergonomics and Information Systems KIE
"UkENDo"-Demonstrator (architecture)
Doctrine database
Main control unit
• system-parameter
• notification
Situational data
Inference engine
trigger
doctrines
User interfaces:
visualisation of
situational data
(GIS/displays)
visualisation of situational parameters
(text/graphics/flow charts/
process diagrams)
monitoring and control of system parameter
time tables and doctrines
technical und tactical data and mission data
simulation control, monitoring and activation and deactivation of doctrines
• scenario• own ship data• cinematics• mission data• object relations
Doctrine editor
actions
DB management
time control
efs
UkENDo 16
Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics
Ergonomics and Information Systems KIE
Situation database: user interface
efs
UkENDo 17
Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics
Ergonomics and Information Systems KIE
"UkENDo"-Demonstrator (architecture)
Doctrine database
Main control unit
• system-parameter
• notification
Situational data
Inference engine
trigger
doctrines
User interfaces:
visualisation of
situational data
(GIS/displays)
visualisation of situational parameters
(text/graphics/flow charts/
process diagrams)
monitoring and control of system parameter
time tables and doctrines
technical und tactical data and mission data
simulation control, monitoring and activation and deactivation of doctrines
• szenario• own ship data• cinematics• mission data• object relations
Doctrine editor
actions
DB management
time control
efs
UkENDo 18
Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics
Ergonomics and Information Systems KIE
demonstrator: main control unit
efs
UkENDo 19
Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics
Ergonomics and Information Systems KIE
Demonstrator: output component
efs
UkENDo 20
Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics
Ergonomics and Information Systems KIE
Representation and Visualisation issuesRepresentation and Visualisation issuesConsequences, Problems and Further ResearchConsequences, Problems and Further Research
The variety and magnitude of data and the unpredictability of mission requirements demand support in controlling, interpreting and visualising the system state as well as the parameter adjustments.- Manual intervention has to be enabled- Complete automation is not conceivable due to the complexity of mission situations.
Current constraints:- automation opposed to user-orientation- UI development in several components by various companies- restricted tools for the design of the UI especially for graphics
Issues to be addressed:- Visualisation of the system state with regard to the qualitative effect of parameter values (reading access).- Optimised tools for safe and situation related direct control of parameter adjustments (writing access).
efs
UkENDo 21
Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics
Ergonomics and Information Systems KIE
Representation and Visualisation issuesRepresentation and Visualisation issuesAspects to be ConsideredAspects to be Considered
- Representation of operational parameters’ adjustments;development of "orientation guides" and procedures considering the diversity of parameter values and their logical groupings
- Representation procedures for clarifying the coaction of various parameters (e.g. parameters in "function chains", mission- and user-conditional dependencies)
- Representation of the actual system state and an anticipated system state (projection) after parameter changes
- Change of single parameter values either manually on the basis of the presented system state or automatically by the use of doctrines.Representation of critical effects in the overall context of parameter settings.
- Representation of conflict cases, e.g. detection of doctrines that are inconsistent with manually modified parameter values or that are inconsistent with automatically created doctrines.