Support and Intervention

Support and Intervention

• A County Superintendent of Schools (CSOS) must provide technical assistance if: – The CSOS does not approve

an LEA’s Plan.– The CSOS does not approve

an LEA’s annual update.– The governing board of an

LEA request technical assistance.

What If the LCAP Is Not Approved?

• CSOS may:Identify the LEA’s strengths and weaknesses.

Support and Intervention Options

• CSOS may:– Assign a team of

academic experts to assist the LEA.

– Solicit another LEA to act as a partner to the LEA in need of technical assistance.



• CSOS may:– Request that the

SSPI assign the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence (CCEE).

LEAs that fail to improve student achievement: -- More than one state priority. -- One or more pupil subgroups.

Who Is Assigned Technical Assistance?

LEAs who request TA pay for services.

Technical Assistance

What warrants State Superintendent intervention?

• The LEA did not improve outcomes for three or more subgroups in three out of four consecutive years.• After advice and assistance to the LEA, the CCEE reports:

The LEA has failed to implement recommendations.Inadequate performance is persistent or acute.

State Intervention

Make changes to an LEA’s LCAP.

State Intervention Options

Kja

scbn

osno

adas

nlan

casc

n:ol

xnS

Cas

p”ad

ae

aDV

MA

DP

MD

MA

Das

clna

sasn

eoiin

qaon

qaoc

noas

cnop

nonz

xwD

MaS

QA

CO

WD

NP

QW

EM

W”p

’qw

”WD

PM

QK

SD

UH

BN

BC

DA

IIC

CN

EIO

WN

ALK

AN

CQ

PO

QW

EY

TJH

BP

CK

LOA

CN

PE

IHW

OIQ

NQ

EO

PIN

QQ

ZC

INLW

QW

CIN

QLI

NE

QLW

QIO

NO

LIQ

NO

CQ

INO

NX

OE

INC

OW

INE

CO

IWE

N;N

EW

;wow

owow

owow

owow

owow

owow

owow

owow

owow

oecc

new

ione

weo

cine

qohq

ubci

baks

jcbn

lenq

l;cm

;eqo

cvno

qnw

ocnq

ioeu

cnqi

neqo

icne

qlih

cqi

ouec

bqou

eiou

cbqe

iouv

boqe

vboq

ubvo

qeub

voqe

uboq

uebn

cobn

oqew

pen

Cbi

qebc

ebqe

qqec

ubqo

cune

qoch

nenq

oenc

oqei

cnin

qocu

oube

cocu

cbW

iyak

cbub

aekc

uaeb

cuke

bkue

bkau

bcka

uecb

kebk

ebak

ubak

ubqs

dnvs

imsm

vim

slifv

slid

vnsl

ifndl

vini

lisin

dfvi

lsn

vio;

aa;;

osd;

osdi

;nos

divn

onos

;ioai

osno

iasd

nosd

inoi

sdno

aisn

oisn

aosd

inos

adin

aoin

oasi

ndoa

snoa

sdin

voiv

anos

dnio

asdf

n) A

ll o

f th

e fo

llo

win

g a

re s

tate

pri

ori

ties

:(1

) T

he d

egre

e to

whi

ch t

he t

each

ers

of

the

sch

oo

l d

istr

ict

are

app

rop

riat

ely

assi

gn

ed in

acc

orda

nce

with

Sec

tion

4425

8.9,

and

fu

lly

cred

enti

aled

in

th

e su

bje

ct a

reas

, an

d, f

or t

he p

upils

the

y ar

e te

achi

ng,

ever

y pu

pil i

n th

e sc

hool

dis

tric

t ha

s su

ffic

ien

t ac

cess

to

th

e st

and

ard

s-al

ign

ed i

nst

ruct

ion

al

mat

eria

ls a

s de

term

ined

pur

suan

t to

Sec

tion

6011

9, a

nd s

cho

ol

faci

liti

es a

re m

ain

tain

ed i

n g

oo

d r

epai

r as

spe

cifie

d in

sub

divi

sion

(d)

of

Sec

tion

1700

2.

(2)

Imp

lem

enta

tio

n o

f th

e ac

adem

ic c

on

ten

t an

d p

erfo

rman

ce s

tan

dar

ds

adop

ted

by t

he s

tate

boa

rd,

incl

udin

g ho

w t

he p

rogr

ams

and

serv

ices

will

en

able

En

gli

sh l

earn

ers

to a

cces

s th

e co

mm

on

co

re

acad

emic

co

nte

nt

stan

dar

ds

adop

ted

purs

uant

to

Sec

tion

6060

5.8

and

th

e E

ng

lish

lan

gu

age

dev

elo

pm

ent

stan

dar

ds

adop

ted

purs

uant

to

Sec

tion

6081

1.3

for

purp

oses

of

gain

ing

acad

emic

co

nte

nt

kno

wle

dg

e an

d E

ng

lish

lan

gu

age

pro

fici

ency

. (3

) P

aren

tal

invo

lvem

ent,

incl

udin

g ef

fort

s th

e sc

hool

dis

tric

t m

akes

to

seek

par

ent

inp

ut

in m

akin

g

dec

isio

ns

for

the

scho

ol d

istr

ict

and

each

indi

vidu

al s

choo

lsite

, an

d in

clu

din

g h

ow

th

e sc

ho

ol

dis

tric

t w

ill

pro

mo

te p

aren

tal

par

tici

pat

ion

in

pro

gra

ms

for

un

du

pli

cate

d p

up

ils

and

in

div

idu

als

wit

h

exce

pti

on

al n

eed

s.

(4)

Pu

pil

ach

ieve

men

t, a

s m

easu

red

by

all

of

the

foll

ow

ing

, as

app

licab

le:

(A)

Sta

tew

ide

asse

ssm

ents

…(B

) T

he A

cade

mic

Per

form

ance

Ind

ex…

(C)

The

per

cent

age

of p

upils

who

hav

e su

cces

sful

ly c

ompl

eted

cou

rses

tha

t sa

tisfy

the

req

uire

men

ts f

or

entr

ance

to

the

Uni

vers

ity o

f C

alifo

rnia

and

the

Cal

iforn

ia S

tate

Uni

vers

ity,

or c

aree

r te

chni

cal e

duca

tion

sequ

ence

s…(D

) T

he p

erce

ntag

e of

Eng

lish

lear

ner

pupi

ls w

ho m

ake

prog

ress

tow

ard

Eng

lish

prof

icie

ncy…

(E)

The

Eng

lish

lear

ner

recl

assi

ficat

ion

rate

. (F

) T

he p

erce

ntag

e of

pup

ils w

ho h

ave

pass

ed a

n ad

vanc

ed p

lace

men

t ex

amin

atio

n w

ith a

sco

re o

f 3

or

high

er.

(G)

The

per

cent

age

of p

upils

who

par

ticip

ate

in,

and

dem

onst

rate

col

lege

pre

pare

dnes

s pu

rsua

nt t

o, t

he

Ear

ly A

sses

smen

t P

rogr

am…

or a

ny s

ubse

quen

t as

sess

men

t of

col

lege

pre

pare

dnes

s.(5

) P

up

il e

ng

agem

ent,

as

mea

sure

d b

y al

l o

f th

e fo

llo

win

g,

as a

pplic

able

: (A

) S

choo

l att

enda

nce

rate

s.

(B)

Chr

onic

abs

ente

eism

rat

es.

(C)

Mid

dle

scho

ol d

ropo

ut r

ates

…(D

) H

igh

scho

ol d

ropo

ut r

ates

. (E

) H

igh

scho

ol g

radu

atio

n ra

tes.

(6

) S

cho

ol

clim

ate,

as

mea

sure

d b

y al

l o

f th

e fo

llo

win

g,

as a

pplic

able

: (A

) P

upil

susp

ensi

on r

ates

. (B

) P

upil

expu

lsio

n ra

tes.

(C

) O

t7-1

2, r

espe

ctiv

ely)

…in

clud

ing

the

prog

ram

s an

d se

rvic

es d

evel

oped

and

pro

vide

d to

und

uplic

ated

pu

pils

and

indi

vidu

als

with

exc

eptio

nal n

eeds

, an

d th

e pr

ogra

m a

nd s

ervi

ces

that

are

pro

vide

d to

ben

efit

thes

e pu

pils

as

a re

sult

of t

he f

undi

ng r

ecei

ved

purs

uant

to

Sec

tion

4223

8.02

(LC

FF

)…(8

) P

up

il o

utc

om

es,

if av

aila

ble,

in

th

e su

bje

ct a

reas

des

crib

ed in

Sec

tion

5121

0 an

d su

bdiv

isio

ns (

a) t

o (i

), in

clus

ive,

of

Sec

tion

5

LCA

P

Develop and impose a budget revision in conjunction with a revised LCAP.


Stay or rescind an

that would prevent

student improvement.

action


Appoint an academic trustee

to exercise powers on

his/her behalf.


If any action is taken, the SSPI will notify:

– CSOS– CBOE– LEA Superintendent– LEA Governing

Board

State Intervention

California Collaborative for Educational Excellence

(CCEE)Purpose:

Assist COEs and LEAs in achieving LCAP goals.

Who Is the CCEE?

Individuals, LEAs or organizations with the expertise, experience, and a record of success in:

• State priorities. • Improving the quality of teaching.• Improving the quality of school

district and school-site leadership. • Addressing needs of special

populations.

• Governing boards who request the advice and assistance of the CCEE.

• LEAs for whom the CSOS believes the advice and assistance of the CCEE is necessary to help the school district or charter school accomplish the LCAP goals.

• LEAs for whom the SSPI believes the advice and assistance of the CCEE is necessary to help the school district or charter school accomplish the LCAP goals.

Who Does the CCEE Assist?

Also must identify evidence based programs that could be used to meet goals

If LEA is identified as persistently underperforming

Also must identify evidence based programs that could be used to meet goals

If LEA is identified as persistently underperforming and had CCEE

A Gift of More Local Control

After All – Who’s This Cake For?

Documents

Support and Intervention