Supplier Scorecard Guidelines

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 Supplier Scorecard Guidelines

    1/6

    Supplier Scorecard Guidelines

    Revision Date: 1 September 2004

    Approved

    (Signature on file)

    John Saliture, DirectorSupplier Quality & Technical Performance

    Integrated Systems Sector

    1

  • 8/6/2019 Supplier Scorecard Guidelines

    2/6

    General Information

    As part of our efforts to more effectively rate supplier performance, Northrop Grumman Integrated Systemshas refined the Supplier Scorecard Process. The Scorecard is used to support our commodity managementand strategic sourcing objectives, and is also used as the main criteria for our Platinum Source Certificationprogram. More importantly, we believe the Scorecards facilitate stronger communications between

    Northrop Grumman and our production supplier team members.

    Production suppliers who supply material that is ultimately delivered to our customer will receive aScorecard. Manufacturers and distributors will receive a Scorecard. Special processors, service suppliers,and tooling suppliers will not receive a Scorecard.

    Supplier Scorecards are posted quarterly on the Northrop Grumman OASIS website located athttps://oasis.northgrum.com/under MyOASIS.

    Northrop Grumman Team Members

    Both Quality and Procurement review and have input into your Scorecard.

    Each supplier has been assigned a Supplier Quality and Technical Performance (SQ&TP) Process

    Manager. The Process Manager insures accuracy of the Quality Profile and inputs the Process Health/Lean/ Six Sigma rating.

    Some suppliers receive purchase orders from multiple sites within the Integrated Systems sector andtherefore have various buyers assigned to them. The buyers are responsible to review and correct theDelivery metrics prior to publication. The buyer who has the most open purchase order dollars has beenidentified as the lead buyer. The lead buyer is responsible for loading the Customer Satisfaction element ofthe Scorecard.

    Access to MyOASIS

    A user ID and password are required to access Supplier Scorecards within MyOASIS. If your companydoes not have a user ID and password, please contact one of these individuals for help:

    Suzette SakazakiInternet Supplier Programs(310) [email protected]

    Lisa TerryIntegrated Delivery Team(310) [email protected]

    Lori NewSupplier Quality Administration

    (310) [email protected]

    For MyOASIS login problems, please call Suzette Sakazaki.

    2

  • 8/6/2019 Supplier Scorecard Guidelines

    3/6

    Scorecard Elements

    Your Supplier Scorecard is made up of the following elements. These elements have assigned point valuesand when combined together comprise your Scorecard rating.

    Objective Elements

    Quality (ref: Figure 2) Late Delivery

    o Material received more than 7 days late based on the negotiated purchase orderdate within the last 6 months.

    Team Assessment Elementso Customer Satisfaction

    Responsiveness Responds quickly and thoroughly to requests, written and verbal

    o Alwayso Usually, requires an occasional follow upo Seldom, typically requires multiple follow up

    Able to Accommodate Changes to Requirements with Reasonable Cost andSchedule Impacts

    o Yes, typically minimal impacto Accommodating but needs follow up and extra effort to define impactso Accommodates changes, but cost and schedule impacts seem

    excessiveOversight

    Oversight Required in the Areas of Quality, Technical and DeliveryRequirements

    o No Oversight Requiredo Minimal Oversight Requiredo Regular Oversight Requiredo Excessive Oversight Required

    Management

    Displays Technical and Management Expertise Required to Identify andImplement Innovative Solutions to Issues

    o Proposed solutions are accurate, concise and insightful, addressing allissues at hand

    o Average, most solutions are acceptable. Some require further work.o Unable to consistently offer effective solutions

    o Process Health/ Lean & Six SigmaProcess Health

    Mature Planning and Schedule Management Processeso Supplier has proven Production Control and Planning systems that

    provides sufficient methods to provide parts to contract reqtso Suppliers Production Control and Planning systems inconsistently

    provides sufficient methods to provide parts to contract reqtso Supplier has no Production Control system in place or is not used to

    monitor shop load reqts and the Planning system is non-existent ordeficient

    3

  • 8/6/2019 Supplier Scorecard Guidelines

    4/6

    Lean & Six Sigma

    Embraces Continuous Process Improvement with Tools such as Lean and SixSigma

    o Employees are Trained and Knowledgeableo

    Evidence of some Ongoing Activities or Events that Generate CostReductions and/or Lead Time Improvementso Aggressively Practiced Throughout the Enterprise. Continuous

    Improvement of Costs and Lead Times

    Feedback

    Any questions regarding your Scorecard should be directed to your Quality Process Manager or yourBuyer.

    Supplier Scorecard Format (Figure 1)

    Quality Profile

    Rating

    (See Figure 2)

    Late Delivery(last 6 months)

    (PO Date

    > 7 days)

    Customer

    Satisfaction

    Process

    Health/Lean/

    Six Sigma

    Actual

    100

    90

    80

    77

    70

    67

    57

    54

    47

    44

    34

    30

    20

    10

    0

    Points

    50

    45

    40

    39

    35

    34

    29

    27

    24

    22

    17

    15

    10

    5

    0

    Actual

    0%

    1%

    2%

    3%

    4%

    5%

    6%

    7%

    8%

    9%

    > 9%

    Points

    30

    27

    24

    21

    18

    15

    12

    9

    6

    3

    0

    Points

    10

    9

    8

    7

    6

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    0

    Points

    10

    9

    8

    7

    6

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    0

    Supplier ScorecardRating

    Blue 91-100

    Green 75-90

    Yellow 51-74

    Red 0-50

    Scorecard Formula

    (Quality Score) + (Late Delivery Score) + (Customer Satisfaction score) + (Process Health Score) =Overall Score

    4

  • 8/6/2019 Supplier Scorecard Guidelines

    5/6

    Quality Profile Rating (Figure 2)

    =

    Supplier Quality ProfileQADRRs(30% wt)0 (30)1 (20)2 (10)3+ (0)

    Hardware AcceptanceRating (70% wt)

    100 (70)99 (47)

    97 - 98 (24)0 - 96 (0)

    100 = Blue67 to 99 = Green35 to 66 = Yellow

    < 35 = Red

    Hardware Acceptance Rating: 1 (Quantity of pieces rejected divided by the quantity of pieces

    received) x 100 based on previous 12 months of supplier history.

    QADRRs: Three (3) months of closed QADRRs and all QADRRs with open Corrective Action.

    Quality System disapproval, appearing in a GIDEP alert or advisory, or a disclosure of

    nonconforming hardware that has been delivered to a Northrop Grumman customer within the last

    12 months will result in an automatic RED Quality Profile rating of a one (1).

    5

  • 8/6/2019 Supplier Scorecard Guidelines

    6/6

    Supplier Scorecard

    3rd Qtr 2004

    Supplier Number: 123456

    Supplier Name: XYZ CompanyMfg./Dist. Address: 123 South St.

    Orange, NJ 00000

    Buyer Name Process Manager Platinum Source IS Programs

    ACS: Parker, G Williams, B Yes E-2CAEW: Quail, P BQM-34AGS: Thomas, C JSTARS

    Scorecard Ratings

    Quality

    Late Delivery

    Customer Satisfaction

    Process Health/ Lean

    Total

    50

    30

    10

    77

    10

    Blue = 91 100; Green = 75 90; Yellow = 51 74; Red = 0 - 50

    Notes:IS - Integrated Systems

    ACS - Air Combat Systems

    AEW/EWS - Airborne Early Warning/

    Electronic Warfare Systems

    AGS/ BMS - Airborne Ground Surveillance/

    Battle Management Systems

    27

    10

    10

    30

    Available Pts. Earned Pts.

    6