12
Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the Last Glacial Maximum X. Zhang*, G. Lohmann, G. Knorr and X. Xu Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bussestrasse 24, D-27570, Bremerhaven, Germany *Correspondence to: X. Zhang ([email protected])

Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the ...Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the Last Glacial Maximum X. Zhang*, G. Lohmann, G. Knorr and X. Xu Alfred

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the ...Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the Last Glacial Maximum X. Zhang*, G. Lohmann, G. Knorr and X. Xu Alfred

Supplementary Materials for

Two ocean states during the Last Glacial Maximum

X. Zhang*, G. Lohmann, G. Knorr and X. Xu

Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bussestrasse 24,

D-27570, Bremerhaven, Germany

*Correspondence to: X. Zhang ([email protected])

Page 2: Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the ...Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the Last Glacial Maximum X. Zhang*, G. Lohmann, G. Knorr and X. Xu Alfred

2500 2550 2600 2650 2700 2750 2800 2850 2900 2950 300015

20

25

30

35

model year

AM

OC

inde

x (S

v)

LGM−WLGM−S

 

A  

2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 300014.8

14.85

14.9

14.95

15

15.05

15.1

15.15

15.2

15.25

15.3

15.35

15.4

model year

Glo

bal S

ST (d

egC

)

LGMWLGMS

 

B  

Figure S1 AMOC indices (a) and (b) 100-year running mean of global mean

SST within the transient ocean state LGMS-t (red line, right y-axis) and

quasi-equilibrium ocean state LGMW-e (blue line, left y-axis) ocean states.

Page 3: Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the ...Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the Last Glacial Maximum X. Zhang*, G. Lohmann, G. Knorr and X. Xu Alfred

LGM-W

LGM-W LGMS-e

LGM-W LGMS-e

LGMS-e

a)# b)#

c)# d)#

e)# f)#

Figure S2 Meridional section of zonal mean temperature (a-b, units: °C),

salinity (c-d, units: psu) and stream function (e-f, units: Sv (106 m3/s)) in the

Atlantic Ocean for LGMS-e (a, d, e) and climatology of model year 3900-

4000 in LGMW (b, d, f).

Page 4: Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the ...Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the Last Glacial Maximum X. Zhang*, G. Lohmann, G. Knorr and X. Xu Alfred

Figure S3 Zonal mean of wind stress in Southern Hemisphere (unit: Pa). PI:

preindustrial run; LGMW-e: the LGM simulation is initialized from the

glacial Ocean; LGMS-tdeep: the LGM simulation is initialized from the

Present Day Ocean.

Page 5: Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the ...Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the Last Glacial Maximum X. Zhang*, G. Lohmann, G. Knorr and X. Xu Alfred

Figure S4 Zonal mean of net freshwater flux (FWF, unit: Sv, 106m3/s) in the

Atlantic catchment area. Blue line represents LGMW-e, red LGMS-tdeep and

black PI.

Page 6: Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the ...Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the Last Glacial Maximum X. Zhang*, G. Lohmann, G. Knorr and X. Xu Alfred

A

B

Figure S5 Anomaly of heat flux (unit: W/m2) between A) LGMW-e and PI,

B) LGMS-tdeep and PI. Negative values indicate heat loss from the ocean.

The reduced heat loss from the ocean in Nordic sea and in the Japan Sea is

attributed to the enhanced sea ice cover (Fig. 4).  

Page 7: Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the ...Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the Last Glacial Maximum X. Zhang*, G. Lohmann, G. Knorr and X. Xu Alfred

A"

 

Page 8: Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the ...Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the Last Glacial Maximum X. Zhang*, G. Lohmann, G. Knorr and X. Xu Alfred

B"

Figure S6 A. Anomaly of climatological SIC (%, shaded) and Sea Ice

Transport (m2/s, vector, the scale is indicated by the black arrow below the

panels) between LGMS-tdeep and PI. Black contour represent 15% SIC, while

blue for 90% SIC. Solid line indicates SIC in LGMS-tdeep, and the dashed is

for PI. B) Same as A), but for LGMW-e and LGMS-tdeep. In our LGM runs,

the extensive SIC and SIC export contribute to enhanced brine rejection,

which is of great importance to maintain the AABW formation during the

LGM.

Page 9: Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the ...Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the Last Glacial Maximum X. Zhang*, G. Lohmann, G. Knorr and X. Xu Alfred

0 100 200 3000

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

year

AMO

C in

dex

(Sv)

Freshwater Perturbation

LGMS−t LGMS−e LGMS−0.2SvLGMS−e 0.2Sv fwf

Figure S7 Time series of AMOC in the 0.2Sv (FWP lasts for 150 years)

hosing experiments of LGMS-tdeep (red) and LGMS-e (blue). The hosing

experiments started from the model year 2700 and 4500 in the LGMS

simulation for LGMS-tdeep and LGMS-e, respectively. The dashed lines

represent the LGMS control runs, and solid line for hosing experiments. It is

shown that after the FWP an AMOC overshoot was found in LGMS-e as

LGMW-e, while no overshoot in LGMS-tdeep. This suggests an important

role of ocean stratification on AMOC overshoot after the FWP.

Page 10: Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the ...Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the Last Glacial Maximum X. Zhang*, G. Lohmann, G. Knorr and X. Xu Alfred

Years

Dep

th (m

)

LGMW−e fwf−0.2Sv (NA Temp. ano)

100 200 300 400

0

1000

2000

3000

4000 −8−6−4−202468

Years

Dep

th (m

)

LGMW−e fwf−0.2Sv (GIN Temp. ano)

100 200 300 400

0

500

1000

1500

2000 −8−6−4−202468

Years

Dep

th (m

)

LGMS−t fwf−0.2Sv (GIN Temp. ano)

100 200 300

0

500

1000

1500

2000 −8−6−4−202468

Years

Dep

th (m

)

LGMS−t fwf−0.2Sv (NA Temp. ano)

100 200 300

0

1000

2000

3000

4000 −8−6−4−202468

a)#

b)#

c)#

d)#

Figure S8 The vertical structure of the temperature anomaly between 0.2Sv

hosing and corresponding control runs in the convection sites of the North

Atlantic (20°W-40°W, 50-60°N) (a, c) and the Nordic Sea (20°W-10°E, 65-

75°N) (b, d) for the 0.2Sv hosing experiments of LGMW-e (a, b) and

LGMS-tdeep (c, d). It is shown that the subsurface warming in quasi-

equilibrium ocean state is much more pronounced than the transient ocean

state LGMS-t in response to the FWP, especially in the convection sites of

the North Atlantic. This will benefit a rapid destabilization of water column

and eventually the AMOC overshoot (Mignot et al., 2007).

Page 11: Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the ...Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the Last Glacial Maximum X. Zhang*, G. Lohmann, G. Knorr and X. Xu Alfred

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400−0.3

0

0.3

0.6

Sub

Sal.

Ano.

(psu

)

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000

0.8

1.6

2.4Sal.Temp.

0

0.8

1.6

2.4

Sub.

Tem

p. A

no. (°

C)

LGMW−e fwf−0.2Sv

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400−0.9

−0.6

−0.3

0

0.3

Sal.

Ano.

(psu

)

Years

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4003

9

15

21

27

SB1PBSB2

3

9

15

21

27

AMO

C In

dex

Ano

(Sv)

Figure S9 Upper panel: Subsurface temperature (red, right y-axis) and

salinity (blue, left y-axis) in Tropical regions (20°S-30°N, 100-500 m).

Lower panel: Time series for AMOC transport (black, right y-axis) and box

salinities (red, green and blue, left y-axis) for the 0.2 Sv hosing experiments

in the simulation LGMW-e. The Atlantic basin is partitioned into box SB1

(45°S-20°S, 0-500 m), PB (35 N-80°N, 0-2000 m) and SB2 (45°S-20°S,

500-2000 m). Combined with Fig. S10, we propose that the AMOC

overshoot in quasi-equilibrium ocean states can also be attributed to the

basin-wide salinity adjustment (Liu et al., 2009), while the tropical

contribution might also play a role on restoring the AMOC by transportation

of warmer and saltier subsurface water to the convection sites (Cheng et al.,

2010).

Page 12: Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the ...Supplementary Materials for Two ocean states during the Last Glacial Maximum X. Zhang*, G. Lohmann, G. Knorr and X. Xu Alfred

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350−0.15

0

0.15

0.3

Sub

Sal.

Ano.

(psu

)

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350−0.8

0

0.8

1.6Sal.Temp.

−0.8

0

0.8

1.6

Sub.

Tem

p. A

no. (°

C)

LGMS−t fwf−0.2Sv

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350−0.9

−0.6

−0.3

0

0.3

Sal.

Ano.

(psu

)

Years

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 3503

10

17

24

31

SB1PBSB2

3

10

17

24

31

AMO

C In

dex

Ano

(Sv)

Figure S10 Same as Fig. S9 but for 0.2 Sv hosing experiment in LGMS-tdeep.