Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
S1
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION GUIDE
A CRUCIAL REQUIREMENT FOR HEDGEHOG SIGNALING IN SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER
Kwon-Sik Park1,2§, Luciano G. Martelotto5§, Martin Peifer6, Martin L. Sos6,7, Anthony N. Karnezis9, Moe R. Mahjoub2,3, Katie Bernard1,2, Jamie Conklin1,2, Anette Szczepny5, Jing Yuan10, Ribo Guo10, Beatrice
Ospina10, Jeanette Falzon12, Samara Bennett12, Tracey J. Brown12, Ana Markovic11, Wendy L. Devereux11, Cory A. Ocasio4, James K. Chen4, Tim Stearns2,3, Roman K. Thomas6,7,8, Marion Dorsch10, Silvia
Buonamici10, D. Neil Watkins5, Craig D. Peacock11§* & Julien Sage1,2§*.
Departments of 1Pediatrics, 2Genetics, 3Biology, and 4Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. 5Monash Institute of Medical Research, Monash University, Clayton 3168,
Victoria, Australia. 6Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research with Klaus-Joachim-Zülch Laboratories of the Max Planck Society and the Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, 7Department
I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Köln-Bonn, and 8Laboratory of Translational Cancer Genomics, Center of Integrated Oncology Köln-Bonn, University of Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany.9University of California San Francisco Department of Pathology, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. 10Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. 11Sidney Kimmel
Cancer Centre, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231. 12Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton 3168, Victoria, Australia
§ Equal contribution * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] and [email protected]
Supplementary Discussion pages S2-S3
Supplementary Methods pages S4
Supplementary Figures 1 to 8 pages S5-S12
Supplementary Tables 1 to 2 + Primers list pages S13-S15
Supplementary References pages S16-S17
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.2473
S2
Supplementary Discussion
While the critical role of Hh signaling has been demonstrated in tumor types driven by activating
mutations in the Hh pathway, the functional role and the mode of action of the Hh pathway in solid
tumor cells without mutations in Hh pathway genes is only beginning to be understood. For a synopsis
of the roles of Hh signaling in normal and malignant blood cells (including the key role of the Hh
pathway in CML driven by the oncogenic BCR-ABL fusion protein) please refer to recent reviews 1,2.
Human colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines were shown to be sensitive to Cyclopamine treatment in
culture, although the effects were variable 3. More recently, Varnat and colleagues confirmed that the
Hh-Gli pathway is essential for CRC stem cells and long-term propagation of colon cancer 4. Activation
of Gli signaling may be more important for tumor progression, especially as tumors start to spread 5.
Studies by the Beachy lab showed that the Hh pathway may have a cell autonomous role in the
expansion of digestive tract tumor cells (pancreas, stomach, oesophagus, biliary tract) but not CRC cells,
in contrast to the previous studies 6. Recently, the Ruiz i Altaba lab further examined the role of Hh
signaling in a mouse model of CRC driven by activation of the Wnt pathway. In this context,
widespread Smo deletion rescues the lethality of Apc-mutant mice 7. These data suggest that cell
autonomous activation of the Hh pathway in CRC cells may not be universal, as might be expected
given the diversity of CRC subtypes, but that CRC maintenance may depend on Hh signaling, especially
in advanced tumors.
In pancreas cancer, work from the Hebrok lab showed that Cyclopamine induced apoptosis and
blocked proliferation in a subset of human pancreatic cancer cell lines both in vitro and in vivo 8,
suggesting a cell autonomous role for Hh in tumor maintenance. In mice, forced expression of active
Gli2 in pancreas epithelial cells promoted cancer development initiated by oncogenic Ras or alone;
however, over-expression of Gli does not produce pancreas cancer, rather an undifferentiated carcinoma 9,10. These data suggest a cell autonomous role for Gli in pancreas cancer initiation but these effects may
be independent of canonical Hh signaling 11. It is also possible that tumors expressing oncogenic Ras
shift the role for Hh from autocrine to paracrine 12, rendering the interpretation of data in Ras-driven
tumors challenging. Clearly, there is an important function for Hh signaling in pancreas cancer via a
non-cell autonomous mechanism, including influencing the responsiveness of tumor cells to
chemotherapy 13. Similarly, De Sauvage and colleagues showed that the major mode of action of the Hh
pathway in several cancer types, including pancreas cancer, was paracrine 14. Together, these data point
to both cell-autonomous and non-cell autonomous roles for Hh signaling in pancreas cancer, the relative
contribution of each probably depends on tumor stage and the cellular context.
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.2473
S3
Data with human prostate cancer cells have indicated a cell autonomous role for Hh signaling 15. But
this observation is not applicable to all cell lines 16 and evidence suggests that in several cases the
mechanism of action may be paracrine 17. On the other hand, correlative evidence also suggests that a
more prominent autocrine role for Hh signaling in prostate cancer may occur during tumor progression 18. Ectopic expression of Gli1 can initiate the unlimited proliferation of mouse prostate epithelial
progenitors, suggesting a role for Gli in prostate cancer initiation 19. Similar to pancreas and colorectal
cancer, some advanced prostate tumors activate the Hh pathway, which may play a cell autonomous role
for tumor maintenance in at least a fraction of cases.
In addition to these three carcinomas, emerging evidence also indicates a role for the Hh pathway and
Gli transcription factors in tumor maintenance in melanoma 20,21, breast cancer 22-24, neuroblastoma 25,
lung cancer 26,27, brain cancer 28,29, and rhabdoid tumors 30.
In conclusion, increasing evidence indicates that a least a subset of a large number of solid tumors
displays cell autonomous activation of the Hh pathway and that Hh signaling may play a critical role in
the maintenance of these tumors. Our data in genetically engineered mice demonstrate a role for Hh
signalling in SCLC initiation, suggesting that the Hh pathway could also play a critical role in cancer
initiation in more cases than initially suspected. Finally, our observations that inhibition of the Hh
pathway cooperates with chemotherapy to delay SCLC recurrence may also be applicable to all these
different tumor types.
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.2473
S4
Supplementary Methods
Clonogenicity assays with human SCLC Cells. Cells were grown for 7 days in the presence of NVP-
LDE225 (Novartis), rShh ligand (StemRD and R&D Systems) or the anti-Shh antibody 5E1
(Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, University of Iowa). Control cultures contained vehicle alone
or an irrelevant mouse IgG1 isotype (eBioscience, Cat# 16-4714-82). Alternatively, LX22CL cells were
incubated for 4 days following transduction by Mission® shRNA lentiviral particles targeting human
Smo (Sigma-Aldrich), or an adenovirus encoding a constitutively active Smo mutant 31. Non-targeting
shRNA lentiviral particles (SHC002V) and an AdβGal vector served as controls, respectively. Cells
were washed after treatment, counted and plated at three different densities (500-2500/dish) in 1.1 ml of
Methocult®H4100 (Stemcell Technologies), reconstituted in supplemented Advanced RPMI plus 10%
FBS. 14-18 days after plating, SCLC colonies were scored using an inverted microscope. Dishes
containing 30-150 colonies were selected for re-passage after gentle disaggregation in Accumax
(eBioscience). All of the above experimental procedures were duplicated in the subset of LX22CL cells
surviving on day 4 of recovery, following 2 days of culture in 0.25 µg ml-1 etoposide and 0.5 µg ml-1
carboplatin (Calbiochem).
RT-PCR and quantitative PCR (qPCR). RNA was prepared using Trizol (Invitrogen). 1 µg of RNA
was used for reverse-transcription (RT), and 1/20 volume of the RT reaction mixture was used for each
PCR and qPCR reaction. qPCR was performed with an ABI Prism HT-7900 machine (Applied
Biosystems). The SYBR® Green reaction mixture was used according to the manufacturer’s protocol
(Invitrogen). Annealing and extension of PCR were performed at 60 °C. Forty cycles of PCR were
performed for the all the primers used. The sequences of primers for qPCR were obtained using the
ProbeFinder software in the Universal ProbeLibrary assay design centre (Roche Applied Science).
Primer sequences are shown in the Primers list page S15.
Genomic analysis – CGH arrays. Tumor DNA and normal tissue DNA was extracted from explanted
Rb1/Trp53/Rbl2 mutant mouse tumors or adjacent non-tumoral mouse tissue respectively, using the
Gentra DNA-extraction kit (Qiagen, Gentra Puregene). The samples were digested, marked with
fluorescent dyes (Cy3 tumor; Cy5 normal), and hybridized to Agilent aCGH 4x180K mouse arrays
according to instructions of the manufacturer. Arrays were scanned using an Agilent G2565CA scanner
and raw copy number were computed by the ratio between the intensities of the Cy3 and Cy5 color-
channels of each probe. Next, the baseline was adjusted such that the genome-wide average over the raw
copy numbers yields two. Finally, raw copy numbers were segmented by using the circular-binary
segmentation algorithm 32.
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.2473
S5
Supplementary Figure 1. LacZ activity in brain cells and lung adenocarcinoma cells in Ptc1lacZ/+ mice. (a)
Cerebellar granule cells strongly positive for lacZ expression (blue signal, black arrow) are observed along with
cells showing weak, perinuclear staining (white arrow) in sections from the brain of Ptc1lacZ/+ mice. (b) A
magnified view of the dotted rectangle in a. (c, d) No cells stain positive for X-gal in two non-small cell lung
cancer lesions growing in the lungs of K-RasLSL-G12D/Ptc1lacZ/+ mice 16 weeks after AdCre delivery. Arrowheads
point to the stromal cells that normally stain for lacZ activity in Ptc1lacZ/+ mice even in the absence of any tumors
(not shown). Sections were counterstained with nuclear fast red (pink). Tu: tumor.
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.2473
S6
Supplementary Figure 2. Heterogeneous X-gal staining in the lung epithelium of Ptc1lacZ/+ mice. (a) The
majority of small lesions (defined as proliferating clusters of Syp+ neuroendocrine cells that cannot yet be defined
as parenchymal tumors) stain positive for X-gal (inset: Syp, green; DAPI, blue), while the majority of
neuroendocrine bodies (NEB) and isolated pulmonary neuroendocrine cells (PNEC) stain negative for X-gal. The
black and white arrows point to the same areas in the panel and the inset. (b) Dual staining for Synaptophysin
(Syp) (green in left panels) and X-gal (blue in right panels) shows that a subset of Syp+ pulmonary
neuroendocrine cells (PNEC) displays lacZ activity (upper right) while others are negative (lower right). DAPI
stains cell nuclei in blue. The arrowheads point to the same stromal cell adjacent to the neuroendocrine cells.
Dotted areas indicate the same areas. Quantification of this analysis is shown in Fig. 1b. (c) In the upper airway, a
number of tracheal epithelial cells stain positive for X-gal (arrow), while in the bronchiolar epithelium X-gal+
cells are nearly exclusively stromal cells underlying epithelial cells (arrowhead).
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.2473
S7
Supplementary Figure 3. Expression of Hh pathway components in mSCLC cells. (a) Immunoblot analysis
for some members of the Hh pathway in primary mSCLC tumors and cell lines. Extracts from Shh-LIGHT2 cells
treated with conditioned media from 293 cells (Con) or ShhN-293 cells (ShhN) and from wild-type whole lung
are shown as controls. Gli3A, activator form of Gli3; Gli3R, repressor form of Gli3. Tubulin serves as a loading
control. (b) Representative immunohistochemistry (brown staining) for Cgrp (a neuroendocrine marker) and for
Gli2 on lung sections from Rb1/Trp53 mutant mice. Left, normal lung area. Right, tumor area. Sections were
counterstained with hematoxylin. Note that while we could detect Gli1 mRNA levels by RT-PCR (see Figs. 1 and
3), we were not able to reproducibly detect the Gli1 protein by immunoblot or immunohistochemistry.
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.2473
S8
Supplementary Figure 4. Expression of the SmoM2-YFP transgene in the lungs of Rb1/Trp53 mutant mice.
(a) Immunostaining for Syp (green) in double and triple mutant animals shows that the tumors (Tu) examined are
neuroendocrine. Immunostaining for YFP (green, arrow) shows a signal at the membrane of tumor cells in the
triple mutant animals only (and non-specific, low cytoplasmic staining in sections from both double and triple
mutant tumors). DAPI (blue) stains cell nuclei. (b, c) RT-qPCR analysis for YFP and Gli1 levels in Rb1/Trp53
and Rb1/Trp53/SmoM2 mutant tumors. (C) The number of tumors found in the same animal from which one
tumor was tested for mRNA levels is indicated. *, the number of tumors was not determined in this animal. nd,
not detected.
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.2473
S9
Supplementary Figure 5. Histopathological analysis of Rb1/Trp53 and Rb1/Trp53/SmoM2 lung tumors.
Lung sections from Rb1/Trp53 (left panels) and Rb1/Trp53/SmoM2 (right panels) mutant mice 8 months after
AdCre infection were counterstained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined by a trained pathologist (A. N.
K.). Similar patterns are present in mice from both genotypes: trabecular (a-b), nested/insular (c-d), peripheral
palisading (e-f) and solid (g-h). Dotted circles in E-F highlight ependymal and Flexner-Wintersteiner rosettes.
Tumors from both genotypes showed lymphatic invasion and tumor cell necrosis (data not shown).
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.2473
S10
Supplementary Figure 6. Activation of Hh signaling does not bypass the requirement for loss of Rb1 in
SCLC development. Lung tumors (Tu) that develop in Rb1/Trp53/SmoM2 mutant mice (upper panels) stain
positive for the neuroendocrine marker Synaptophysin (green) and negative for the alveolar marker SP-C (green).
In contrast, lung tumors (Tu) that develop in Rb1het/Trp53/SmoM2 mutant mice (lower panels) stain negative for
Synaptophysin and positive for SP-C; these tumors have histopathological features of lung adenocarcinoma (data
not shown). DAPI (blue) stains cell nuclei.
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.2473
S11
Supplementary Figure 7. Pharmacological inhibition of Hh signaling in mSCLC cells in culture and in vivo.
(a) Cell viability measured by the MTT assay for two independent mSCLC cell lines (derived from Rb1/Trp53
mutant mice) treated with Cyclopamine (Cyc, 10 µM), Tomatidine (10 µM), or vehicle control (Con) for 4 days
(n=3). (b) RT-qPCR analysis for Gli1, using RNA from cells treated with Cyc, Tom, and CON for 24 hours
(n=3). (c) Cell viability measured by the MTT assay for two independent mSCLC cell lines treated with GANT61
or Con for 4 days (n=3). (d) RT-qPCR analysis for Gli1, using RNA from cells treated with GANT61 and CON
for 24 hours (n=3). (e) Representative graph of the effects of NVP-LDE225 treatment on mSCLC primary cell
lines grown in 0.5% and 10% serum (advanced RPMI). The two cell lines used are derived from an Rb1/Trp53
mutant mouse (KP2) and from an Rb1/Trp53/Rbl2 mutant mouse (KP13). (f) Representative pictures of
immunostaining for PH3 and CC3 in SCLC sections in Rb1/Trp53 mutant mice treated with vehicle control or
Cyc following the protocol shown in Fig. 3c. The arrows point to positive cells, the asterisk points to a non-
specific auto-fluorescent area. Quantification of this staining is shown in Figure 3d. Similar immunostaining and
quantification were used for Fig. 2f (data not shown).
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.2473
S12
Supplementary Figure 8. Increased Hh pathway activity in SCLC cells following chemotherapy. (a)
Expression of Shh determined by immunohistochemistry in LX22 xenografts, before and after treatment with
platinum-etoposide chemotherapy. Specific staining is shown in brown, with a hematoxylin counterstain in blue.
(b) Localisation of Gli2 in LX22 xenografts before and after the same chemotherapy treatment. Confocal analysis
of cells stained for DAPI (blue) and Gli2. (c) Primary cilia in chemoresistant LX22 xenograft cells in vivo.
Primary cilia identified by confocal analysis of cells stained for acetylated Tubulin (AcT), gamma Tubulin (gT)
and DAPI (blue) in the upper panel. A similar cell is shown in the lower panel counterstained for Synaptophysin
(Syp). (d) Representative histology (H&E) of LX22 xenografts never treated with chemotherapeutic agents
(“Naïve”) or recurring after chemotherapy (“Resistant”, as in Fig. 4d). Note the histopathological similarities
between the two tumors, composed of small round blue cells. Brown inset: immunostaining for CGRP (brown), a
neuroendocrine marker. The scale bar represents 50 µm.
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.2473
S13
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.2473
S14
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.2473
S15
Primers list: primers used for quantitative RT-PCR analysis of gene expression
Forward Reverse
Shh 5’-TTAAATGCCTTGGCCATCTC-3’ 5’-CCACGGAGTTCTCTGCTTTC-3’
Smo 5’-GCCCAAGTGTGAGAATGACCG-3’ 5’-GGTTGTCTGTTCGCACCAAGG-3’
Gli1 5’-CCTGGTGGCTTTCATCAACT-3’ 5’-GCTAGACATGTCCCCTTCCA-3’
Ptc1 5’-TACGTGGAGGTGGTTCATCA-3’ 5’-CCTGAGTTGTCGCAGCATTA-3’
Cgrp 5’-GCATGGCCACTCTCAGTGAAG-3’ 5’-TTATCTGTTCAGGCCTGAAGG-3’
Gapdh 5’-CTTTACCACCATGGAGAAGGC-3’ 5’-GGCATGGACTGTGGTCATGAG-3’
ARPP P0 5’-GATGCCCAGGGAAGACAG-3’ 5’-ACAATGAAGCATTTTGGATAATCA-3’
Gli1 5’-TGGAGGTCTGCGTGGTAGA-3’ 5’-TTGAACATGGCGTCTCAGG-3’
YFP 5’-ACTACAACAGCCACAACGTCTATATCA-3’ 5’-GGCGGATCTTGAAGTTCACC-3’
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.2473
S16
Supplementary References
1. Jagani, Z., Dorsch, M. & Warmuth, M. Hedgehog pathway activation in chronic myeloid leukemia. Cell Cycle 9, 3449-3456 (2010).
2. Mar, B.G., Amakye, D., Aifantis, I. & Buonamici, S. The controversial role of the Hedgehog pathway in normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Leukemia (2011).
3. Qualtrough, D., Buda, A., Gaffield, W., Williams, A.C. & Paraskeva, C. Hedgehog signalling in colorectal tumour cells: induction of apoptosis with cyclopamine treatment. Int J Cancer 110, 831-837 (2004).
4. Varnat, F., et al. Human colon cancer epithelial cells harbour active HEDGEHOG-GLI signalling that is essential for tumour growth, recurrence, metastasis and stem cell survival and expansion. EMBO Mol Med 1, 338-351 (2009).
5. Varnat, F., Siegl-Cachedenier, I., Malerba, M., Gervaz, P. & Ruiz i Altaba, A. Loss of WNT-TCF addiction and enhancement of HH-GLI1 signalling define the metastatic transition of human colon carcinomas. EMBO Mol Med 2, 440-457 (2010).
6. Berman, D.M., et al. Widespread requirement for Hedgehog ligand stimulation in growth of digestive tract tumours. Nature 425, 846-851 (2003).
7. Varnat, F., Zacchetti, G. & Ruiz i Altaba, A. Hedgehog pathway activity is required for the lethality and intestinal phenotypes of mice with hyperactive Wnt signaling. Mech Dev 127, 73-81 (2010).
8. Thayer, S.P., et al. Hedgehog is an early and late mediator of pancreatic cancer tumorigenesis. Nature 425, 851-856 (2003).
9. Pasca di Magliano, M., et al. Hedgehog/Ras interactions regulate early stages of pancreatic cancer. Genes Dev 20, 3161-3173 (2006).
10. Lau, J., Kawahira, H. & Hebrok, M. Hedgehog signaling in pancreas development and disease. Cell Mol Life Sci 63, 642-652 (2006).
11. Nolan-Stevaux, O., et al. GLI1 is regulated through Smoothened-independent mechanisms in neoplastic pancreatic ducts and mediates PDAC cell survival and transformation. Genes Dev 23, 24-36 (2009).
12. Lauth, M., et al. DYRK1B-dependent autocrine-to-paracrine shift of Hedgehog signaling by mutant RAS. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17, 718-725 (2010).
13. Olive, K.P., et al. Inhibition of Hedgehog signaling enhances delivery of chemotherapy in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Science 324, 1457-1461 (2009).
14. Yauch, R.L., et al. A paracrine requirement for hedgehog signalling in cancer. Nature 455, 406-410 (2008).
15. Sanchez, P., et al. Inhibition of prostate cancer proliferation by interference with SONIC HEDGEHOG-GLI1 signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101, 12561-12566 (2004).
16. Zhang, J., Lipinski, R., Shaw, A., Gipp, J. & Bushman, W. Lack of demonstrable autocrine hedgehog signaling in human prostate cancer cell lines. J Urol 177, 1179-1185 (2007).
17. Shaw, A., Gipp, J. & Bushman, W. The Sonic Hedgehog pathway stimulates prostate tumor growth by paracrine signaling and recapitulates embryonic gene expression in tumor myofibroblasts. Oncogene 28, 4480-4490 (2009).
18. Tzelepi, V., et al. Expression of hedgehog pathway components in prostate carcinoma microenvironment: shifting the balance towards autocrine signalling. Histopathology 58, 1037-1047 (2011).
19. Karhadkar, S.S., et al. Hedgehog signalling in prostate regeneration, neoplasia and metastasis. Nature 431, 707-712 (2004).
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.2473
S17
20. Stecca, B., et al. Melanomas require HEDGEHOG-GLI signaling regulated by interactions between GLI1 and the RAS-MEK/AKT pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104, 5895-5900 (2007).
21. Alexaki, V.I., et al. GLI2-mediated melanoma invasion and metastasis. J Natl Cancer Inst 102, 1148-1159 (2010).
22. Mukherjee, S., et al. Hedgehog signaling and response to cyclopamine differ in epithelial and stromal cells in benign breast and breast cancer. Cancer Biol Ther 5, 674-683 (2006).
23. Thomas, Z.I., et al. Targeting GLI1 expression in human inflammatory breast cancer cells enhances apoptosis and attenuates migration. Br J Cancer 104, 1575-1586 (2011).
24. Souzaki, M., et al. Hedgehog signaling pathway mediates the progression of non-invasive breast cancer to invasive breast cancer. Cancer Sci 102, 373-381 (2011).
25. Mao, L., et al. A critical role of Sonic Hedgehog signaling in maintaining the tumorigenicity of neuroblastoma cells. Cancer Sci 100, 1848-1855 (2009).
26. Yuan, Z., et al. Frequent requirement of hedgehog signaling in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Oncogene 26, 1046-1055 (2007).
27. Singh, S., et al. Hedgehog-Producing Cancer Cells Respond to and Require Autocrine Hedgehog Activity. Cancer Res (2011).
28. Dahmane, N., et al. The Sonic Hedgehog-Gli pathway regulates dorsal brain growth and tumorigenesis. Development 128, 5201-5212 (2001).
29. Clement, V., Sanchez, P., de Tribolet, N., Radovanovic, I. & Ruiz i Altaba, A. HEDGEHOG-GLI1 signaling regulates human glioma growth, cancer stem cell self-renewal, and tumorigenicity. Curr Biol 17, 165-172 (2007).
30. Jagani, Z., et al. Loss of the tumor suppressor Snf5 leads to aberrant activation of the Hedgehog-Gli pathway. Nat Med 16, 1429-1433 (2010).
31. Chen, A.E. & Fan, C.M. Targeting gene expression in the mouse somite: adenovirus-mediated gene delivery and whole embryo culture. Genesis 42, 71-76 (2005).
32. Olshen, A.B., Venkatraman, E.S., Lucito, R. & Wigler, M. Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data. Biostatistics 5, 557-572 (2004).
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.2473