Upload
dinhtuyen
View
214
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Year 2012 in Review
Sunrise in GujaratRESolve Energy Consultants, Chennai
May 2013
Sunrise in Gujarat
Content
Sunrise in Gujarat
Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................................5
Solar in India ..................................................................................................................................... 7
Status of Renewables in Gujarat ........................................................................................................9
Gujarat policy update ...................................................................................................................... 11
District-wise projects .................................................................................................................. 12
Charanka Solar Park .................................................................................................................... 14
Solar Plant performance .................................................................................................................. 15
Ranking of Plants operational for at least 1 Year .........................................................................16
Ranking of plants operational for 10 months ..............................................................................17
Ranking of plants operational for 9 months ................................................................................18
Ranking of plants operational for less than 9 months ..................................................................18
Seasonal Characteristics.............................................................................................................. 19
Seasonal Characteristics – Charanka ........................................................................................... 20
Analysis of PV configuration ............................................................................................................ 21
Modules used ............................................................................................................................. 22
Inverters used ............................................................................................................................. 24
Conclusion....................................................................................................................................... 25
Annexure A - Details of Solar Power Project Developers who have signed PPA ................................27
Annexure B - Gujarat commissioning status ..................................................................................... 30
Content 2
Sunrise in Gujarat
Figures and Tables
Sunrise in Gujarat
Figure 1 - India Solar Resource ..........................................................................................................8
Figure 2 - Gujarat – Power generation capacity ...............................................................................10
Figure 3 - Districts in Gujarat ........................................................................................................... 12
Figure 4 - Charanka Solar Park ......................................................................................................... 14
Figure 5 - Seasonal performance for plants operational for at least one year ..................................19
Figure 6 - Seasonal performance for plants in Charanka ..................................................................20
Figure 7 - Module technology breakup ............................................................................................ 22
Figure 8 - Share of module manufacturers ....................................................................................... 23
Figure 9 - Share of Inverter manufacturers ...................................................................................... 24
Table 1 - District wise solar projects summary .................................................................................13
Table 2 - Plants operational for at least a year .................................................................................16
Table 3 - Plants operational for 10 months ...................................................................................... 17
Table 4 - Plants operational for 9 months ........................................................................................ 18
Table 5 - Plants operational for less than 9 months .........................................................................18
Table 6 - Project developers in Gujarat ............................................................................................ 27
Table 7 - Solar plants in Gujarat ....................................................................................................... 30
Figures and Tables 4
Sunrise in Gujarat
ExecutiveSummary
Sunrise in Gujarat
The solar sector in India is very nascent. Supported by the Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission (JNNSM)
and the state of Gujarat since 2009, the sector has grown tremendously. The learning curve for the stake-
holders in the sector has been steep and there is now a greater understanding about the solar technologies,
design, operation and maintenance among others.
However, solar resource assessment is one area where there is still lot of uncertainty. While lot of satellite
measured data is available, there is not enough long term ground measured data. Due to the lack of reliable
long term data, predicting the yield with high level of accuracy has been quite difficult.
The good news is that the Centre for Wind Energy Technology(C-WET) had set up 51 weather monitoring sta-
tions mainly in West and South India, and the data is now available for more than a year. More importantly,
many of the plants commissioned under the Gujarat policy are now operational for more than a year and the
energy generation data for every month is available.
In this whitepaper, we have analysed the performance of all the operational plants in Gujarat and have
ranked them based on their energy generation. Since the solar plants were commissioned at different time
periods, we have grouped these plants into four different categories in order to account for the seasonal
variations and the initial ramp up of the plants. The groups are – plants operational for at least one year, for
ten months, for nine months and less than nine months. A ranking of solar plants in Charanka solar park has
also been done separately.
We were curious to find the correlation between the yield and the configuration (type of module – c-Si vs.
Thin Films, type of inverter – Central vs. String, etc.) of a plant. But since we did not have enough reliable
data, we have done a preliminary analysis of the market shares of the modules and inverters used in the
plants for which we have data. The market share analysis is built upon the work done by Mr. Jigneshbhai Shah
and M/s Movya Consultancy Pvt. Ltd, Ahmedabad, India.
We plan to update this whitepaper as and when we have access to more reliable and insightful information.
Executive Summary
Executive Summary 6
Sunrise in Gujarat
Solarin India
Sunrise in Gujarat
The growth of Solar in India is well known. From less than 20 MW in early 2010 to more than 1100 MW at the end of 2012, the sector has grown tremendously. With abun-dant solar resource and a huge power deficit, India will rely more on solar in the future.
While the country’s flagship solar programme, the Jawa-
harlal Nehru National Solar Mission (JNNSM) played a critical role in the deployment of solar in India, the state of Gujarat’s contribution has been even more. Of the 1000+ MW installed in the country during the period 2010 to 2012, more than 70% of the projects have been commissioned under the Gujarat state policy.
Solar in India
Figure 1 - India Solar Resource
Solar in India 8
Sunrise in Gujarat
Status ofRenewables in Gujarat
Sunrise in Gujarat
Gujarat is no doubt the forerunner when it comes to adoption of renewable energy technologies in the coun-try. The biggest factor which has contributed to the suc-cess of the uptake of renewable energy in the state is the financial health of the state electricity board. With mounting losses of close to Rs. 2200 Crores posted in 2000-01, the Gujarat State Electricity Board (GSEB) made a dramatic turnaround through debt restructuring and reduction of Aggregate Technical and Commercial (AT&C) losses. This resulted in the GSEB posting a profit of about Rs. 200 Crores in 2005-06. The result is readily obvious – Gujarat is now a power surplus state with one of the low-est electricity tariff in the country; all due to the efforts undertaken to strengthen the GSEB.
The total installed capacity in the states stands at 21,060.63 MW(as of 28 February 2013) with plans afoot to extend the installed capacity base past 30,000 MW in the near future. Thermal power accounts for close to 82% of the total installed capacity base with renewables ac-counting for the remaining 18%. Ranking second when it comes to wind energy (3,008.6 MW installed capacity) in the country, Gujarat is the undisputed leader when it comes to solar power with an installed capacity base of 823.9 MW. It is interesting to note that the solar capacity additions in the state are purely a result of the state’s so-lar policy rather than other policies such as the JNNSM.
Status of Renewables in Gujarat
Figure 2 - Gujarat : Power generation capacity - 21,060 MW
Source: State Load Despatch Centre(SLDC), Gujarat – As of February 28, 2013
Status of Renewables in Gujarat 10
Sunrise in Gujarat
Gujarat policy update
Sunrise in Gujarat
Gujarat, along with Rajasthan, has one of the highest so-lar irradiations in the country. Gujarat signed Power Pur-chase Agreements (PPAs) towards a total 968.5 MW of in-stalled capacity towards end of 2010 and early 2011. The
Gujarat has 26 districts as of 28 February 2013 . The map below gives an overview of the districts in Gujarat.
full list of project developers is available in Annexure A.
As of 31 December 2012, 75 projects totalling 824 MW were commissioned and operational. The complete list of projects is enclosed in Annexure B.
Gujarat policy update
District-wise projects
Figure 3 - District-wise projects
Source: vibrantgujarat.com
Gujarat policy update 12
Sunrise in Gujarat
From the table above, it can be observed that the district
Patan has the highest number of projects and total in-
stalled capacity. In fact, the top 3 districts – Patan, Suren-
dranagar and Kutch – together account for 70% of the
total installed capacity.
One reason for the high installed capacity in the district
Patan is that it has world’s first multi-developer solar park
in Charanka Village.
In fact, Gujarat pioneered this concept of multi-develop-
er, multi-facility, multi-technology and multi-beneficiary
solar park in India.
Gujarat policy update 13
The 75 operational projects are spread across 15 districts in Gujarat. The breakdown is given below.
Table 1 - District wise solar projects summary
SI.No. District Number of projects Total size of projects (MW)
1. Patan 23 275.63
2. Surendranagar 15 172.59
3. Kutch 11 125.23
4. Rajkot 6 60.12
5. Banaskantha 3 55.2
6. Porbandar 3 45.13
7. Jamnagar 1 25
8. Sabarkantha 4 20.18
9. Anand 2 16
10. Amreli 1 10
11. Junagadh 1 10
12. Surat 1 5.01
13 Gandhinagar 2 2
14. Ahmedabad 1 1
15 Bharuch 1 1
75 824.09
Sunrise in Gujarat
60% of the land in the park was government land and the Gujarat Power Corporation Limited (GPCL) developed the park. GPCL provided the critical infrastructure like
• Access roads
• Evacuation infrastructure including substations
• Auxiliary Power distribution network
• Communicaiton network(telecom towers, broadband,etc)
• Safety Towers, fencing, etc
• Environmental protection facilities like Sewage treat-ment plants, Green belt/buffer zone, water facilities for cleaning and irrigation demand
• Landscaping, etc
The total area available can be used to set up solar plants of a total 500 MW capacity. Of this, 214 MW has been installed by 21 developers. (As of 19 April 2012 – Source: GPCL)
Gujarat policy update 14
Charanka Solar Park
The Charanka Solar park is spread over about 2000 Hect-ares in the wastelands of the Rann of Kutch. The Rann of Kutch is a salt marsh at the edge of Thar Desert, and it borders Pakistan. The location is well connected by road and rail. The nearest national highway – NH 15 is about
20 km away and the nearest railway station is about 30 km away.
It is also quite close to the sea and the nearest sea port, Kandla, is about 180 km away. The other ports like Pipava, Porbandar and Mundra.
Figure 4 - Charanka Solar Park
Sunrise in Gujarat
Solar Plant performance
Sunrise in Gujarat
The below sections aim to quantify the performance of the solar power plants set up in the state of Gujarat. For the purposes of evaluation, the generation data available from the Gujarat State Load Dispatch Centre (SLDC) has been used. Ranking of the power plants has been done on the basis of the Plant Load Factor (PLF) or Capacity Utilization Factor (CUF). CUF is calculated as the ratio of actual energy generated (for a given period of time) to
Most plants in operation for a period of one year exhibit CUFs which are in line with what was expected of the regulations. Initially, the policy called for an average CUF in the line of 18% across a year of operation. A vast ma-
the maximum (theoretical) possible generation of a pow-er system. The formula for CUF is given below.
Capacity Utilisation Factor (CUF) =Energy measured (kWh) / (365*24*installed capacity of the plant).
Since the CUF calculation is time dependent (hours of operation), the power plants considered here have been categorized based on the time operation.
jority of the plants (for which the data is available) fulfil this criterion. The plant which ranks first in the list has an estimated CUF of 20.79%.
Solar Plant Performance
Ranking of plants operational for at least one year (January 2012 to December 2012)
Solar Plant performance 16
Ranking Project Name Capacity (MW) Total (MWh) CUF
1. Konark Gujarat PV Pvt. Ltd. 5.00 9107.65 20.79%2. WAA Solar Pvt. Ltd 10.22 18186.57 20.31%3. AZURE (Hariyana) 10.20 17530.94 19.62%4. Green Infra Solar Energy Ltd. 10.00 16966.34 19.37%5. Welspun Urja Gujarat Pvt. Ltd 15.00 24990.60 19.02%6. TATA Power Renewable Energy Ltd., 25.00 40502.47 18.49%7 GHI Energy pvt. Ltd. 10.00 16139.82 18.42%8 Precious Energy Services Pvt.Ltd 15.20 24397.47 18.32%9 Millenium Synergy(Gujarat) Pvt.Ltd 9.27 14789.23 18.21%10 BACKBONE Enterprises Ltd. 5.00 7975.53 18.21%11 AEL(Solar) 40.11 63780.53 18.15%12 Unity Power 5.00 7947.32 18.14%13 Solitaire Energies Pvt.Ltd. 15.00 23834.56 18.14%14 LANCO(BHRD) 5.00 7943.44 18.14%15 ESP Urja pvt. Ltd. 5.00 7890.38 18.01%16 AZURE Power (Gujarat) Pvt. Ltd 5.00 7856.87 17.94%17 Visual Percept Solar Projects Pvt.Ltd. 25.00 37156.12 16.97%18 PLG Photovoltaic Ltd 20.00 29321.56 16.74%19 GIPCL 5.00 6836.74 15.61%20 Louroux Bio Energies Ltd. 25.00 32357.32 14.78%21 LANCO(Chandiyana) 15.01 18120.43 13.78%
280.01 433631.90
Table 2 – Plants operational for at least a year (January 2012 to December 2012)
Sunrise in Gujarat
On the lower end of the spectrum we have a 15 MW power plant of LANCO with a CUF of 13.78%. Though it is difficult to pinpoint the reasons for the low CUF, one can
Projects which have been operational for 10 months are mostly clustered in the Charanka solar park. The advan-tage of measuring performance in the Charanka solar park is that most of the variable factors affecting plant per-formance are eliminated such as irradiation conditions, evacuation variability etc. As a result, most of the power plants in the Charanka solar park (highlighted in yellow) have similar CUF hovering between 17% and 18%.
assume it might be due to a multitude of reasons includ-ing grid unavailability, plant downtime etc.
The outliers, in Charanka’s case at least, are AES Solar En-ergy’s and Lanco’s projects with CUF of 13.6% and 12.53% respectively. Since most of the variables are similar in the case of Charanka, this can be jotted down only to compo-nent choice and hence component specific performance which affects the performance of the power plant as a whole.
Ranking of plants operational for ten months (March 2012-December 2012)
Ten months of operation
Solar Plant performance 17
Ranking Project Name Capacity (MW) Total (MWh) CUF
1 NKG Infrastructure ltd 10.00 13802.69 18.79%2 Palace Solar Energy pvt.ltd 15.00 20649.04 18.74%3 Sun Clean Renewable pvt.ltd 6.00 8229.13 18.68%4 Roha Dyechem pvt.ltd 25.04 34285.22 18.64%5 ZF Steering Gear (India) pvt.ltd 5.00 6799.25 18.52%6 GSPC Pipavav Power Company ltd. 5.00 6773.88 18.45%7 Solarfield Energy Pvt. Ltd. 20.06 27164.32 18.44%8 Alex Astral Power pvt.ltd 25.07 33693.18 18.30%9 ACME Solar Technology 15.00 19763.23 17.94%10 SEI Solar Power Gujarat pvt.ltd 25.00 32846.68 17.89%11 Emami Cement ltd 10.06 13156.79 17.81%12 ICML 9.00 11705.80 17.71%13 Surana Telecom & Power ltd. 5.00 6436.70 17.53%14 GMR Gujarat solar power pvt.ltd 25.00 31812.80 17.33%15 EMCO Ltd 5.00 6019.93 16.39%16 GPCL 5.01 5908.18 16.06%17 GMDC 5.00 5652.40 15.39%18 AES Solar Energy Gujarat pvt. Ltd 14.92 14906.81 13.60%19 Lanco Infratech ltd. 15.01 13814.09 12.53%20 Arvali Infrapower Ltd.(Operational
for 11 months)5.00 4213.55 10.51%
21 Gangesh Green Energy pvt.ltd 25.08 16906.39 9.18%275.25 334540.07
Plants operational under the Charanka Solar Park are highlighted in yellow
Table 3 – Plants operational for 10 months (March 2012-December 2012)
Sunrise in Gujarat
Ranking of plants operational for less than nine months (upto December 2012)
Solar Plant performance 18
Ranking Project Name Capacity (MW) Total (MWh) CUF
1 Ganeshvani Merchandise Pvt. Ltd 5.04 4927.17 16.63%
2 SunBorne Energy Gujarat One Pvt.Ltd
15.00 12309.03 15.98%
3 Yantra eSolar India Pvt. Ltd 4.95 1264.67 11.57%
4 Sunkon Energy Pvt. Ltd 10.00 4965.27 8.44%
Total 34.99 23466.14
Plants operational under the Charanka Solar Park are highlighted in yellow
Table 5 – Plants operational for less than 9 months (upto December 2012)
Ranking of plants operational for 9 months (April 2012 to December 2012)Ranking Project Name Capacity (MW) Total (MWh) CUF
1 Mono Steel(India) ltd 10.00 13284.6 20.13%
2 Moser Baer Energy & Development ltd
15.02 17241.3 17.39%
3 Sand Land Real Estate pvt.ltd 25.00 28480.9 17.26%
4 Hiraco Renewable Energy pvt.ltd 20.11 20140.3 15.17%
5 CBC Solar Technologies Pvt.Ltd 10.00 9625.5 14.58%
6 Jaihind Project 5.00 4698.8 14.24%
7 Solar Semiconductor Power Company 20.00 17295.5 13.10%
Total 105.13 110766.9
Table 4 – Plants operational for 9 months (April 2012 to December 2012)
Sunrise in Gujarat
Figure 5 - Seasonal Performance for Plants operational for at least 1 year
Solar Plant performance 19
The seasonal variation graph represented below has been
rendered using data from power plants which have com-
pleted one year of operation. All numbers in the graph
have been normalized to the total MWh generated per
MW of installed capacity.
The plant with the best performance characteristics, M/s
Konark Gujarat Pvt Ltd, had a peak monthly production
of 198 MWh/MWp in March. Though this is not a charac-
teristic of all the plants in the sample set, a vast major-
ity had peak production that fell in one of three months
– March, April or May. The highest individual peak gen-
eration recorded was 216.38 MWh/MWp by M/s Back-
bone Enterprises Ltd in the month of May but the annual
production of this plant was lower than the top ranking
power plant.
The lowest generation is merely presented here to pro-
vide a representation of the lowest performance and
should not be treated as the general performance of
power plants in Gujarat. It can be clearly seen that the av-
erage performance closely follows the generation charac-
teristic of the best performing power plant in the sample
set. The average annual performance is estimated to be
1573.33 MWh/MWp.
Seasonal Characteristics
Sunrise in Gujarat
Figure 6 - Seasonal performance for plants in Charanka
Solar Plant performance 20
Seasonal Characteristics – Charanka
The seasonal variation for plants in Charanka is present-ed below. Please note that the entire year of operations is not covered as the data set available is only for ten months of operation. Further, all the power plants rep-resented in the data set where commissioned in March 2012. One of the plants, Yantra eSolar India Pvt. Ltd has been excluded from the analysis because it was commis-sioned in October 2012 and data for only 3 months were available.
The performance of the highest rated power plant can be taken as representative of the performance of all the power plants in the Charanka solar park as the difference between the average value and the highest generation is minimal. Peak power output from the solar park was produced in the month of May as opposed to the three month spread seen in the above scenario. Additionally, a secondary peak is seen in the month of October which is
slightly lower than the production numbers in May. The best performing power plant, M/s NKG Infrastructure Ltd, had a peak generation of 166.23 MWh/MWp in the month of May while the highest recorded generation for a given month is 176.85 MWh/MWp also generated in the month of May by M/s Roha Dyechem(India) Pvt Ltd.
Interestingly, though the plant with the lowest CUF(M/s Lanco Infratech Ltd) produced significantly lower output in the first few months of operation, the yield caught up during the latter part of the year indicating that the plant was experiencing teething issues. It is likely that when the data for the next year is compiled, the lowest per-formance numbers would be more in line with the aver-age and that the degree of variation between the highest and lowest numbers would be minimal. The average yield for the ten month period is estimated to be 1279 MWh/MWp.
Sunrise in Gujarat
Analysis of PV configuration
Sunrise in Gujarat
Gujarat has been a test-bed for several solar technolo-gies and configurations. In this section, we look at the preliminary breakup of the different modules and invert-ers used. The analysis is built upon the work done by Mr. Jigneshbhai Shah and M/s Movya Consultancy Pvt. Ltd,
The Gujarat solar policy was the first state solar policy to be enforced in the country. The state policy is purely aimed at solar capacity addition. With this in mind, the developers were not pigeonholed into a particular tech-nology choice and were free to choose any technology they saw fit, provided the technology chosen was proven
Ahmedabad . Since the information is not available for all the plants, we have done the analysis for those plants where we have enough relevant information.
and time tested. Since the Gujarat solar policy did not im-pose any domestic content requirements (DCR) as it has been under Phase 1 of the JNNSM, we see an (almost) equal split between c-Si and thin film technologies with the end result being slightly in favour of c-Si.
Modules used
Analysis of PV configuration
Figure 7 - Module technology breakup
Analysis of PV configuration 22
Total Capacity - 492.61 MW
Sunrise in Gujarat
Amongst the various available thin film technolo-gies, CdTe based modules command a significant percentage of the share driven primarily through developers opting for First Solar’s modules. This is because these modules bring along with them the added benefit of low interest rate financing from EXIM bank of USA since the modules are manufactured in the USA. This could also be the reason that First Solar ranks as the largest supplier of modules in the module supplier mix for power plants in
Gujarat (for which data is available) with a market share of about 32%.
CIGS/CIS based modules have been gaining ground in In-dia but hold a very small percentage of the share of the market with Solar Frontier emerging as the leader in this space with their high performance CIS based modules.
Figure 8 - Share of module manufacturers
Analysis of PV configuration 23
Total Capacity - 486.61 MW
Sunrise in Gujarat
Figure 9 - Share of Inverter manufacturers
Analysis of PV configuration 24
On the inverter, SMA is the clear leader in the segment with over 50% of the market share for the plants for which data is available. The most likely explanation for this is that SMA had an early mover advantage leveraged through their high brand equity and bankability. Since most of the power plants came into operation over two years ago when the solar segment was very nascent, brand equity played a major rule in the decision making process and with SMA being the global
leader in the inverter segment, most developers opted to go for their inverters. Power One is second in the listing closely mirroring the global inverter market scenario.
Siemens, which announced that it would be exiting the solar business earlier this year, is the third largest supplier with a market share of about 7%.
Inverters used
Total Capacity - 442.61 MW
Sunrise in Gujarat
Conclusion
Sunrise in Gujarat
The initial analysis of plant performance data in Gujarat is heartening. The data shows with enough clarity that solar power plants in India can be expected to perform to the levels that are usually outlined in the various Request for Proposal(RfP) documents chiefly with regards to the expected CUF levels. While it was initially thought by many that the CUF levels of 18% might be hard to achieve, the ground performance data for the power plants in Gujarat suggest that the CUF of most power plants in operation are clustered around the 18% mark with some power plants even operating higher at about 20% CUF. If this performance of more than 18% CUF can be repeated every year, one of the uncertainties – solar irradiation assessment – will be reduced.
The Charanka solar park performance data is also quite revealing with some of the higher capacity power plants (20 MW+) operating at 18%+ CUF levels. The Charanka solar park highlights the importance of the presence of proper evacuation infrastructure and the positive influence it brings into the operation of a power plant and its availability. In addition to this, with most of the variables associated with solar power eliminated due to all the plants being pres-ent in the same location (such as solar irradiation characteristics etc.), the park clearly highlights that differences in technology selection may have only a marginal impact on the performance of the power plant provided high quality components are used along with employment of sound design and constructional practices.
The performance of the power plants in Gujarat acts as a fool proof test case that shows that the Indian solar sector is globally competitive both in terms of conceptualization as well as execution provided the policy and regulatory frame-work along with the infrastructure to support the power plants are in place. The success story of solar in Gujarat owes a lot to the financial health of the state utilities and the regulatory support that goes along with it and serves a good blueprint for other states to emulate.
Conclusion
Conclusion 26
Sunrise in Gujarat
Annexure A - Details of Solar Power Project Developers who have signed Power Purchase agreement
SI.No. Name MW
1 Aatash Power Pvt Ltd 52 Abellon Cleanenergy Limited 33 ACME Tele power Ltd 154 Adani Power Ltd 40
5 AES Solar Energy Gujarat Pvt Ltd 15
6 Alex Astral Power Pvt Ltd 257 Ambit Advisory Services Pvt Ltd 58 APCA Power Private Limited 59 Aravali Infrapower Limited 510 Astonfield Renewable Resources 11.511 Avatar Solar 512 Azure Power (Gujarat) Pvt Ltd 513 Azure Power (Haryana) Pvt Ltd 1014 Backbone Enterprises Limited 515 Cargo Motors (Tata) 2516 Claris LifeScience Ltd 217 Common Wealth Business Technologies 1018 Corner Stone Energy Pvt Ltd 519 Driesatz My Solar 1520 EI Technologies Pvt. Ltd 121 Emami Cement Limited 1022 EMCO Limited 523 ESP Urja 524 Essar Power Limited 125 Euro Solar Private Ltd 526 Ganeshvani Merchandise Private Limited 527 Ganges Green Energy Private Limited 2528 GHI Energy Private Limited 1029 GMR Gujarat Solar Power Pvt. Ltd 2530 Green Infra Solar Energy Limited 1031 GSPC Pipavav Power Company Limited 532 Gujarat Industries Power Company Limited 533 Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation Limited 534 Gujarat Power Corporation Limited 535 Harsha Engineers Limited 136 Hiraco Renewable Energy Pvt Ltd 2037 India Solar Ray Power Private Limited 10
Annexure A 27
Table 6 - Project developers in Gujarat
Sunrise in Gujarat
SI.No. Name MW
38 Industrial Power Infrastructure Limited 2539 Inspira Solar (Palace) 1540 Integrated Coal Mining Limited 941 Jaihind Projects Limited 5
42 Kemrock Industries and Exports Limited 10
43 Kiran Energy Solar Power Private Limited 2044 Konark Gujarat PV Pvt. Limited 545 Lanco Infratech Ltd 546 Lanco Infratech Ltd 1547 Lanco Infratech Ltd 1548 Louroux Bio Energies Limited[72] 2549 MBH Power Private Limited 150 Mi My Solar 1551 Millenium Synergy (Gujarat) Private Limited 1052 Monnet Ispat & Energy Limited 2553 Mono Steel (India) Ltd. 1054 Moser Baer Energy & Development Ltd 1555 NKG Infrastructure Limited 1056 PLG Power Ltd 4057 Precious Energy Services Pvt Ltd 1558 Rajesh Power Services Private Limited 159 Rasna Marketing Services LLP 160 Responsive Sutip Limited 2561 Roha Energy Private Limited 2562 S J Green Park Energy Private Limited 563 Sand Land Real Estates Pvt Ltd 2564 Saumya Construction Pvt Ltd 265 Solar Semiconductor Pvt Ltd 2066 Solitaire Energies Pvt Ltd 1567 Som Shiva Impex Limited 168 Sun Edison Energy India Private Limited 2569 SunBorne Energy[87] 1570 SunClean Renewable Power Pvt. Ltd. 2571 Sunkon Energy Pvt Ltd 1072 Surana Telecom & Power Limited 574 Taxus infrastructure & Power Project Pvt Ltd 575 Toss Financial Services Pvt Ltd 276 Ujjawala Power Pvt Ltd 2577 Unity Power Pvt Ltd 578 Universal Solar System 2
Annexure A 28
Sunrise in Gujarat
SI.No. Name MW
79 Visual Percept Solar Projects Private Limited 2580 WAA Solar Pvt Ltd 1081 Welspun Urja India Limited 1582 Yantra eSolarIndia Private Limited 5
83 Zeba Solar Gujarat Pvt Ltd 10
84 ZF Steering Gear (India) Limited 5Total 968.5
(Source: Gujarat Energy Development Agency – GEDA)
Annexure A 29
Sunrise in Gujarat
Annexure B - Gujarat commissioning status
The commissioning of these projects as of 31 December 2012 is given below.
Sr. No Company Name Project Allotted(MW)
District Commissioned ( MW)
1 Aatash Power Pvt. Ltd. 5 Sabarkantha 4.992 Abellon Clean Energy Ltd. 3 Sabarkantha 33 ACME Solar Technologies
(Gujarat) Pvt. Ltd.15 Anand 15
4 Adani Enterprises Ltd. 40 Kutch 40.115 AES Solar Energy Gujarat Pvt. Ltd. 15 Patan 14.926 Alex Astral Power Pvt. ltd. 25 Patan 25.077 APCA Power Pvt. Ltd. 5 Rajkot 58 AravaliInfrapower Ltd. 5 Rajkot 59 Astonfield Solar (Gujarat) Private
Limited 11.5 Patan 11.51
10 Azure Power (Gujarat) Pvt. Ltd. 5 Surendranagar 511 Azure Power (Haryana) Pvt. Ltd. 10 Sabarkantha 10.212 Backbone Enterprises Ltd. 5 Kutch 513 CBC Solar Technologies Pvt. Ltd. 10 Rajkot 1014 Chattel Constructions Private Ltd. 25 Surendranagar 2515 Claris Lifesciences Ltd. 2 Sabarkantha 1.9916 Dreisatz MySolar24 (P) Ltd. 15 Surendranagar 14.9917 EI Technologies Pvt. Ltd. 1 Patan 118 Emami Cement Ltd. 10 Patan 10.0619 EMCO Ltd. 5 Surendranagar 520 ESP UrjaPvt. Ltd. 5 Surendranagar 521 Essar Power Ltd. 1 Kutch 122 Euro Solar Power Pvt Ltd, 5 Kutch 5.1223 Ganeshvani Merchandise Pvt Ltd 5 Rajkot 5.0424 Ganges Green Energy Pvt Ltd. 25 Rajkot 25.0825 GHI Energy Pvt. Ltd. (SPV of Refex) 10 Porbandar 1026 GMR Gujarat Solar Power Pvt. Ltd. 25 Patan 2527 Green Infra Solar Energy Ltd. 10 Rajkot 1028 GSPC Pipavav Power Company Lim-
ited5 Patan 5
29 Gujarat Industries Power Company Ltd.(GIPCL)
5 Surat 5.01
Gujarat - Solar Power Plants as of December 31, 2012
Annexure B 30
Table 7 - Solar plants in Gujarat
Sunrise in Gujarat
Sr. No Company Name Project Allotted(MW)
District Commissioned ( MW)
30 Gujarat Mineral Development Company Ltd.(GMDC)
5 Kutch 5
31 Gujarat Power Corporation Ltd. 5 Patan 532 Gujarat State Electricity Corpora-
tion Ltd.-Canal1 Ahmedabad 1
33 Gujarat State Electricity Corpora-tion Ltd.-TPS
1 Gandhinagar 1
34 Harsha Engineers Ltd. 1 Anand 135 Hiraco Renewable Energy Pvt. Ltd. 20 Porbandar 20.1136 Integrated Coal Mining Ltd. 9 Kutch 937 Jaihind Projects Ltd. 5 Patan 538 Konark Gujarat PV Pvt. Ltd. 5 Kutch 539 LancoInfratech Ltd 5 Patan 540 LancoInfratech Ltd 15 Patan 15.0141 LancoInfratech Ltd 15 Patan 15.0142 Louroux Bio Energies Ltd. 25 Surendranagar 2543 MBH Power Pvt. Ltd. 1 Bharuch 144 MI MySolar24 (P) Ltd, 15 Surendranagar 14.9945 Millennium Synergy (Gujarat) Pvt. Ltd. 10 Surendranagar 9.2746 Mono Steel (India) Ltd. 10 Junagadh 1047 Moserbaer Energy & Development Ltd. 15 Porbandar 15.0248 NKG Infrastructure Ltd. 10 Patan 1049 Palace Solar Energy Pvt. Ltd. 15 Patan 1550 PanditDeendayal Petroleum
University 1 Gandhinagar 1
51 PLG Photovoltaics Ltd 20 Patan 2052 Precious Energy Services Pvt. Ltd. 15 Banaskantha 15.253 Rajesh Power Services Pvt. Ltd. 1 Surendranagar 154 Rasna Marketing Services LLP 1 Surendranagar 155 Responsive sutip ltd. 25 Surendranagar 2556 RohaDyechemPvt. Ltd. 25 Patan 25.0457 S J Green Park Energy Pvt. Ltd 5 Surendranagar 5.1258 Sandland Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. 25 Banaskantha 2559 SEI Solar Power Gujarat Pvt. Ltd. 25 Patan 2560 Solar Semiconductor Power Com-
pany ( India) Pvt Ltd20 Kutch 20
61 Solarfield Energy Private Limited 20 Patan 20.0662 Solitaire Energies Pvt. Ltd. 15 Banaskantha 1563 Som Shiva (Impex) ltd. 1 Surendranagar 164 Sun Clean Renewable Power Pvt. Ltd. 25 Patan 665 Sunborne Energy Gujarat One Pvt.Ltd. 15 Kutch 15
Annexure B 31
Sunrise in Gujarat
Sr. No Company Name Project Allotted(MW)
District Commissioned ( MW)
66 Sunkon Energy Pvt. Ltd. 10 Amreli 1067 Surana Telecom & Power Ltd. 5 Patan 568 TATA Power Renewable Energy
Ltd.25 Jamnagar 25
69 Unity Power Private Ltd. 5 Kutch 570 Universal Solar System 2 Patan 271 Visual Percept Solar Projects Pvt. Ltd. 25 Surendranagar 2572 Waa Solar Pvt. Ltd. 10 Surendranagar 10.2273 WelspunUrja Gujarat Pvt. Ltd. 15 Kutch 1574 YantraeSolar India Pvt. Ltd. 5 Patan 4.9575 ZF Steering Gear(India) Pvt. Ltd. 5 Patan 5
842.5 824.09
(Source : Gujarat Energy Development Agency – GEDA)
Annexure B 32
Contact Us
For comments, feedbacks and suggestions, please contact the authors of this report
Hari Manoharan – [email protected]
Madhavan Nampoothiri – [email protected] us
RESolve Energy Consultants is a renewable energy advisory firm based in Chennai, India. RESolve has
advised clients across the entire PV value chain – PV manufacturing, Balance of Systems, Project develop-
ment. RESolve has also assisted North American and European companies in their market entry to the Indian
olar sector. More details about the company can be found at www.re-solve.in
Contact us
For comments, feedbacks and suggestions, please contact the authors
Hari Manoharan – [email protected]
Madhavan Nampoothiri – [email protected]
Disclaimer
The authors have taken the best care to ensure correctness and accuracy of the data presented in this
research work. However in the unlikely event of any discrepancy, you are requested to kindly bring it to their
notice.
To receive Perspectives and Insights on the latest developments in the Renewable Energy sector, subscribe to RESolve Newsletter.
www.re-solve.in/perspectives-and-insights