Upload
chy12061
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
1/52
Sung Eun Lee
dissertation
II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation and Maintenance
Religious expressions are anchored in communities in society. Religious groups
and their activities as social phenomena could and should, thus, be explained in light of
the discipline about humans in society. Religion needs to be investigated in light of
sociology. Here I would like to review and evaluate a number of important sociological
theories that seek to explain the origins and vitality of deviant (high-tension) religious
groups.
1. Why do people enter a deviant community: theoretical reflections
First of all, I would like to raise one question: why are people entering certain
sectarian (or deviant) religious movements? This question seems to arise out of the
famous church-sect dichotomy, and the dominant sociological explanations of conversion
into a sectarian perspective have assumed that such conversions happen primarily when
people are attracted to particular new doctrines and theologies. In particular, many New
Testament sociologists simply assume that people who suffered certain types of
deprivation tend to be fascinated by the ideological or doctrinal appeal of a sectarian
religious movement. However, a study of the relationships between conversion and
social network began to see the issue somewhat differently.1 Recent sociology of religion
sees that social network or interpersonal relationships are very important in the process of
1 See Malcolm Hamilton, The Sociology of Religion: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives, 2nd ed.
(London and New York: Routledge, 2001) 238-45, 262-71.
1
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
2/52
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
3/52
Christianity: church, sect, and mysticism.5 Actually, only the concepts of church and sect
have been applied because mysticism was thought to be inherent in any type of religious
movement.
According to Troeltsch, a church is by nature an inclusive institution, and adjusts
itself to the secular world. Thus, a church is cooperative with the social order of the
society at large. A sect is voluntary and exclusive in character, and demands certain
types of religious perfection from the individual and total fellowship between its group
members. The former corresponds well to the upper class of a given society, but the
latter by and large is favored by the lower class.
6
In this scheme the concepts of church
and sect become polarized, and the economic situation of religious members has been
considered to be a more important factor.7 H. Richard Niebuhr, accepting Troeltschs
idea that a sect is essentially unstable and tends to develop into a church, further argued
that the earliest fervors of sectarian religious movements is valid only for the first
generation.8 After the first generation, the sect must adapt to the world. The second and
third generations are no longer poor and hostile to the secular world. They become
welcomed into society and begin to contribute much to the world:
Wealth frequently increases when the sect subjects itself to the discipline of
asceticism in work and expenditure; with the increase of wealth the possibilities
for culture also become more numerous . . . compromise begins and the ethics of
the sect approach the churchly type of morals. And with the ethics, so with the
doctrine, so also with the administration of religion.9
The social patterns of the sect thus are considerably different.10
5 Ernst Troeltsch, The Social Teaching of the Christian Churches, vol. 2, trans. Olive Wyon (Louisville:Westminster/John Knox Press, 1992) 993.6 Troeltsch, The Social Teaching, vol. 2, 993; H. Richard Niebuhr, The Social Sources of
Denominationalism (New York: Meridian Books, 1957) 17-18.7 Cf. Niebuhr, Social Sources, 19-20.8 Niebuhr, Social Sources, 19.9 Niebuhr, Social Sources, 20.10 Niebuhr, Social Sources, 21, 145-46. In this regard he proposes the concept of denominationalism.
3
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
4/52
What is much more important is that since Niebuhrs sharpened argument has
been dominant, such a traditional distinction between church and sect lies mainly in the
assumption that sect members are economically marginalized. Niebuhr suggested that
denominationalism was based mainly in class conflict. His suggestion is based on his
own observations that masses were less secular than the middle classes, and many times
created religious movements. He concluded that the successful formation of a sectarian
religious body by the masses was inevitably captured by the middle classes and
accommodated to the secular world.11
The church-sect dichotomy has been dominant in the sociology of religion
because this line of typologizing seems to have analytic value. There are some developed
proposals on this. J. Milton Yinger proposed the concept of an established sect. This
type of sect is somewhat more inclusive, less alienated, and more structured than the
sect.12 More often cited is Bryan R. Wilsons sect typology. He attempts to specify the
type of a sect according to the kind of response to the world that the sect adopts.13
Conversionistsects emphasize evangelism and conversion of people.14Adventistsects
are focused on predicting the imminent reversal of the present world.15Introversionist
sects underscore the withdrawal of the believing community from the secular world.
Manipulationistsects pay attention to their own esoteric knowledge. Thaumaturgical
sects are devoted to miracles and wonders. Reformistsects pay attention to solving social
problems. Utopian sects are commonly founded as corporate communities for social
11 Niebuhr, Social Sources, 26-33, 275-78.12 J. Milton Yinger, The Scientific Study of Religion (New York: Macmillan, 1970) 266. The Quakers are a
good example.13 Bryan R. Wilson, An Analysis of Sect Development,American Sociological Review 24 (1959): 2-15. A
slight revision of this article was published inPatterns of Sectarianism: Organisation and Ideology inSocial and Religious Movements, ed. Bryan R. Wilson (London: Heinemann, 1967) 22-45.14 Conversionist sects are centered on free-will optimism.15 This type of sect is supposed to seek a pessimistic determinism.
4
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
5/52
transformation.16 But as Stark and Finke evaluate succinctly, names explain nothing,17
and empirical tests need to be performed. The single dimension, the response of the
world seems less discernible, and the sect typology itself remains arbitrary.
Some scholars in sociology of religion began to propose a somewhat differently
nuanced version of this church-sect typology. Many of them tried to focus on other than
economic factors when explaining why people decided to join a sectarian religious
movement that hates the secular world and the established mainline religious movement.
Many of them have been fascinated with the explanatory feasibility of relative
deprivation. Charles Y. Glock, one of the prominent proponents of this theory has
argued that the traditional sect-church theory was only viable for distinguishing the types
of religious movements, and not for discovering the conditions under which religious
groups originate.18 To relative deprivation theorists, new sectarian movements may not
necessarily recruit their member primarily from the economically deprived class of
society.19 I will explain the arguments of relative deprivation theory later.
Although the church-sect dichotomy has been dominant, after Benton Johnson
judged that this typology is of limited use and postulated a new definition of the church-
sect typology in terms of the degree of tension between a religious body and its
surrounding socio-cultural environment, the situation has become quite different.20
According to Johnson, the terms sect and church need to be redefined. A church is a
religious group that accepts the social environment in which it exists, whereas a sect is a
16 See Bryan R. Wilson, Sects: A Sociological Study (London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1970) 36-47.17 Stark and Finke,Acts of Faith, 143.18 Charles Y. Glock, The Role of Deprivation in the Origin and Evolution of Religious Groups, in
Religion and Social Conflict, eds. R. Lee and M. E. Marty (Oxford and New York: Oxford University
Press, 1964) 24.19 Glock, Role of Deprivation, 25.20 Benton Johnson, On Church and State,American Sociological Review 28 (1963): 539-49.
5
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
6/52
religious group that rejects the social environment in which it exists.21 The definition is
this simple: the higher the tension, the more sect-like the religious organization; the lower
the tension, the more church-like the religious body.22 Johnson has made this kind of
thought clear. The church-sect typology is not mutually exclusive but can be placed on a
continuum.
Following Johnson, Stark and his fellows also theorize about the concepts of
church and sect.23 Church and sect are no longer mutually exclusive categories, but
depend on the degree oftension or degree ofdeviance. Tension here refers to the degree
of distinctiveness, separation, and antagonism between a religious group and the outside
world.24 Deviance refers to departure from the norms of a culture in such a way as to
incur the imposition of extraordinary costs from those who maintain the culture.25
As Peter L. Berger rightly suggests, to continue to sustain a meaningful structure
of religious identity, any religious group basically needs to develop a plausibility
structure for their social world, that is, for social interaction among those who share the
same meaning structures.26 A sectarian group needs to emphasize the direct relationships
among fellow members, and this requires the group to be in greater tension with the
wider society. This kind of social and religious separation in a deviant, high-tension
movement is reinforced when thinking and behaviors are dominated by a dualistic
worldview. Their worldview is unlike others in the main society. A dualistic worldview
21
Johnson, On Church and State, 542.22 See Rodney Stark and William S. Bainbridge,A Theory of Religion (New Brunswick: Rutgers University
Press, 1996) 122.23 A church is a conventional religious organization, whereas a sect is a deviant or high-tension religious
organization with traditional beliefs and practices. See Stark and Bainbridge, Theory of Religion, 124.24 Stark and Finke,Acts of Faith, 143.25 Stark and Bainbridge, Theory of Religion, 124.26 Peter L. Berger, The Sacred Canopy: Elements of A Sociological Theory of Religion (New York,
Doubleday, 1967) 46-47. Cf. Peter L. Berger and T. Luckmann, The Social Construction of Reality: A
Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1966).
6
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
7/52
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
8/52
to a schismatic, high-tension movement within a dominant religious tradition, a cult
includes new religious movements that constitute a deviant religious tradition.33 Sects
may thus be, they believe, easily able to do their missionary work in a particular local
community of relatively deprived people. In its scheme sectarianism tends to be
prominent only in a more stratified society.34 Cults, however, do require transmission of
new culture. Cult formation involves religious innovation, not mere schisms within
conventional religious organizations.35 Stark thus argues that cults will probably spread
more rapidly through the extensive social network of a cosmopolitan elite, if they
recruit among the advantaged.
36
However, this distinction between cult and sect is, in effect, made in terms of
their origins, and remains not as a mutually exclusive category but as a point on
continuum.37 For example, is the Unification Church (Moonies) a schismatic sect or a
novel cult in Stark and Bainbridges terms? Any deviant religious movement can have
the characteristics of both.
Since both sects and cults are deviant, high-tension groups in terms of their
origins, it seems to me that distinguishing between sects and cult is not necessary. In
many ways the terms seem interchangeable. Even to Stark and Finke, both sect and cult
are deviant, and what seems important are the ways of describing a deviant (either
sectarian or cultlike) religious movement:
33 Rodney Stark and William S. Bainbridge, The Future of Religion: Secularization, Revival, and Cult
Formation (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1985) 149.34 Stark and Bainbridge, Theory of Religion, 237.35 Stark and Bainbridge,Future of Religion, 149. Stark even argues that Christianity was not a sect withinconventional paganism. The early church was a cult movement in the context of the empire (Rodney Stark,
The Rise of Christianity: How the Obscure, Marginal Jesus Movement Became the Dominant Religious
Force in the Western World in a Few Centuries [Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996] 45). He
infers that Pauls missionary efforts had their greatest success among the middle and upper middle classes.
Cult movements overrecruit persons of more privileged backgrounds (Stark,Rise of Christianity, 45-46).36 Stark and Bainbridge, Theory of Religion, 237.37 Hamilton, Sociology of Religion, 251.
8
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
9/52
The higher its level of tension with its surroundings, the more extensive the
commitment to a religious organization.
The higher its level of tension with its surroundings, the more expensive it is to
belong to a religious group.
The higher its level of tension with its surroundings, the more exclusive,extensive and expensive the level of commitment required by a religious group.
The higher a groups level of tension with its surroundings, the higher its average
level of member commitment.38
The commitment and interaction within a deviant, high-tension religious group has to be
extensive. Their commitment is shown by the extensive efforts of the new converts to
break off close relationships with previous friends and acquaintances.39 Members of such
a religious group must have exclusively strong relationships with each other. Once
conversion happens, deviant groups must help the converts maintain their faith or their
new social world. In Bergers terms, the process of social engineering must be
successfully done. The new social world should be, as far as possible, taken for
granted,40because religion by nature needs to maintain the socially defined reality by
legitimating situations in terms of an all-encompassing sacred reality.
41
In this regard,
many applications of world-maintenance theory have been attempted in New
Testament studies.42 Because my concern is with the reasons people join a high-tension
religious perspective, namely, with the issue of the world-construction in Bergers
term, however, I will pursue the issue of the world-maintenance in the later part of this
38 Stark and Finke,Acts of Faith, 145. As applied to religious commitment, the word extensive refers to
the range and depth of religious effects on the individual, and the word expensive refers to the material,social, and psychic costs of belonging to a religious group (Stark and Finke,Acts of Faith, 144).39 John Lofland,Doomsday Cult: A Study of Conversion, Proselytization, and Maintenance of Faith
(Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1966) 11.40 Berger, Sacred Canopy, 24.41 Berger, Sacred Canopy, 44. Bergers argument is worth noting: The prerequisite of plausibility pertains
to entire religious worlds as well as to the legitimations designed to maintain these, . . . the firmer the
plausibility structure is, the firmer will be the world that is based upon it (47). See an example study on
maintaining faith, Lofland,Doomsday Cult, 63-189.42 Many New Testament scholars have employed Bergers this idea.
9
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
10/52
chapter.
What is important at this point is that a sect is by definition a high-tension
religious movement in regard to its socio-cultural environment, and requires its group
members to have stronger, exclusive social relationships with other members.
B. Sect Formation and Relative Deprivation
Since church-sect typology has been widely used, the point of view that the
particular ideology (theology) of a sectarian group appeals to persons who suffer
deprivation has been given as an answer to why people join high-tension religious
movements.43 Since Niebuhrs church-sect typology has been dominant, it has been
affirmed that deprivation itself is a necessary condition for the rise of new religious
movements, especially sectarian or high-tension ones. Some began to propose that the
concept of deprivation be broadened and generalized beyond its customary usage in sect-
church theory. Arguing that church-sect typology conceives of deprivation primarily in
terms of economic status,44 relative deprivation theorists thus go on to suggest that there
are forms of deprivation other than economic deprivation, and that these factors can also
involve the rise of new religious movements.
First, David Aberle defines relative deprivation as a negative discrepancy
43
Cf. Ralph Linton, Nativistic Movement,American Anthropologist45 (1943): 230-40; Graham Allen,A Theory of Millenialism: The Irvingite Movement as an Illustration,British Journal of Sociology 25
(1974): 296-311; Norman Cohn, Medieval Millenarism: Its Bearing on the Comparative Study ofMillenarian Movement, in Millennial Dreams in Action: Studies in Revolutionary Religious Movements,
ed. S. L. Thrupp (New York: Schocken Books, Inc., 1962) 31-43; George Shepperson, The Comparative
Study of Millenarian Movements, in Millennial Dreams in Action: Studies in Revolutionary Religious
Movements, ed. S. L. Thrupp (New York: Schocken Books, Inc., 1970) 44-52. For an early application of
the relative deprivation theory to Judaism, see S. R. Isenberg, Millenarism in Greco-Roman Palestine,
Religion 4 (1974): 26-46.44 Glock, Role of Deprivation, 26.
10
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
11/52
between legitimate expectation and actuality.45 He goes on to say that where an
individual or a group has a particular expectation and furthermore where this expectation
is considered to be a proper state of affairs, and where something less than that
expectation is fulfilled, we may speak of relative deprivation.46 He also classifies the
types of deprivation as those of possession, status, behavior, and worth in addition to
economic deprivation. Moreover, if a sense of blockage is felt, this sense would
become the source of the millenarian movements that are inclined to the more
supernatural and dualistic.47
Second, according to Charles Y. Glock, there are five kinds of deprivations which
people may subjectively feel: economic, social, organismic, ethical, and psychic ones.
Any person may experience more than one kind of deprivation.48 Religious attempts to
eliminate deprivation are likely to compensate for feelings of deprivation rather than to
eliminate its causes.49
He criticizes that traditional church-sect typology overlooks the fact that not all
religious groups begin as sects.50 Religious groups of the socially deprived are more
likely to be like a church, because those who are socially deprived are primarily
concerned to accommodate themselves to the larger society rather than to escape from
it.51 Religious movements arising out of ethical deprivation tend to develop an
45 David Aberle, A Note on Relative Deprivation Theory as Applied to Millenarian and Other Cult
Movement, inReader in Contemporary Religion: An Anthropological Approach, eds. W. A. Lessa and E.Z. Vogt (New York: Harper & Row, 1964) 209.46 Aberle, Note on Relative Deprivation Theory, 209. The deprivation is not a particular objective stateof affairs, but a difference between an anticipated state of affairs and a less agreeable actuality. The
deprivation itself is not absolute.47 Aberle, Note on Relative Deprivation Theory, 212.48 Glock, Role of Deprivation, 27.49 Glock, Role of Deprivation, 29.50 Glock, Role of Deprivation, 26.51 Glock, Role of Deprivation, 31.
11
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
12/52
organizational form which is distinct from that of traditional religions.52 Responses to
psychic deprivation, which seems close to ethical deprivation, often lead to religious
movements and these movements then assume a cult-like rather than a sect-like or
church-like form.53 It is from the economically deprived that a sect gains its
membership. In sum, present or anticipated deprivation would appear to be a central
factor in the formation of new movements.54 Concerning church-sect typology, Glock
suggests that the ability of churches to survive in basically unchanged form is a
consequence of the persistence of social deprivation.55 He goes on to say that churches
tend to gain their greatest commitment from individuals who are most deprived.
56
Namely, sectarian religious movements emerge when they are stimulated by economic
deprivation, while church-like movements emerge where the deprivation is social.57
It is important to note that those relative deprivation theorists posit that the
ideology of the movement is to be related to the types of deprivation.58 The ideologies
are understood in terms of the compensation provided for the deprived. From this
perspective, ideology is often portrayed as a somewhat irrational response to the world.59
Thus a sense of deprivation is always relative to some level of expectation that is not
fulfilled.60 Relative deprivation theorists here appear to emphasize the subjective
character of the state of felt deprivation. By focusing on internal psychological states,
52 Glock, Role of Deprivation, 33.53 Glock, Role of Deprivation, 32. Glock accepts the concept of cult.54
Glock, Role of Deprivation, 32.55 Glock, Role of Deprivation, 34.56 Glock, Role of Deprivation, 34. Thus, it is the less gifted intellectually, the aged, women, and thosewithout normal family lives who are most often actively involved in the church.57 Glock, Role of Deprivation, 33.58 See Aberle, Note on Relative Deprivation Theory, 212-13.59Robert Wuthnow, Meaning and Moral Order: Explorations in Cultural Analysis (Berkeley and Los
Angeles: University of California Press, 1987) 152. In some sense, it has been a classical thesis since Karl
Marx.60 Hamilton, Sociology of Religion, 240.
12
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
13/52
such as anxiety and other felt needs, relative deprivation models are basically concerned
with explanations at the individual or socio-psychological level. However, these factors
may or may not be present because their subjectivity may be largely unobservable.61
Often ideological movements occur among the relatively advantaged, and they are mainly
concerned with maximizing new opportunities rather than restoring some traditional
values that have become endangered.62 Relative deprivation theory seldom establishes
that the alleged sense of deprivation was actually felt or experienced by those who join,
and customarily assumes that it was felt.63
Thus, it became evident that the deprivation and ideological appeal explanation
for the recruitment to deviant religious movements was incomplete.64 However, it should
be noted that seeing deprivation as not always material is a strong point of relative
deprivation theory. Non-material deprivation may be important in the rise of new
religious movements.
In the early 1960s John Lofland and Rodney Stark conducted an ethnographic
study of the first group of Moonies in America.65 The interpersonal bonds between the
members of this deviant religious body and their potential recruits came to be considered
essentially important. Lofland and Stark have found that people were drawn to the
ideology because their ties to the group were strong and meaningful: final conversion
was coming to accept the opinions of ones friends.66Stark, together with Roger Finke,
61 Wuthnow, Meaning, 154.62 Wuthnow, Meaning, 153.63 Hamilton, Sociology of Religion, 240.64 Stark and Bainbridge,Future of Religion, 308.65 John Lofland and Rodney Stark, Becoming a World-Saver: A Theory of Conversion to a Deviant
Perspective,American Sociological Review 30 (1965): 862-75; see also Lofland,Doomsday Cult.66 Lofland and Stark, Becoming a World-Saver, 871. A famous conversion scholar, Lewis R. Rambo
(Understanding Religious Conversion, [New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993] 7) also suggests that
conversion is what a group or personsays it is. Emphasis is his.
13
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
14/52
later fairly reasons that conversion is seldom about seeking or embracing an ideology.
Conversion is, in effect, about bringing ones religious behavior into alignment with that
of ones friends and family members.67This can be confirmed by the fact that the
perception of converts situation prior to their conversion can be influenced by the sects
ideology/theology.68It should thus be noted that religious conversion usually moves
through a preexisting social network.69
Accepting the thesis that social relations play an essential role in recruitment to
high-tension religious movements does not necessarily mean that the traditional thesis
that combines both the deprivational and ideological appeals is incorrect. People must
still experience enduring and acutely felt tensions before they join a high-tension
religious body.70
There seems to be no conflict between the deprivation and ideological appeal line
of analysis and the analysis that stresses the importance of social networks.71 A situation
of felt deprivation is an indispensable precondition for the rise of any social and religious
movement. However, deprivation is not, in itself, a sufficient condition. People gain
faith from strong social relationships, not from personal deprivation alone.72 New
converts must be placed in a situation where they will develop social bonds with
members of the group.73 Otherwise, people with weak social bonds to a group are most
likely to leave it.74
Using theories similar to relative deprivation theory, some New Testament
67 Stark and Finke, Acts of Faith, 117.68 Hamilton, Sociology of Religion, 240.69 Stark and Bainbridge,Future of Religion, 309, 362.70 Stark and Bainbridge,Future of Religion, 311.71 Stark and Bainbridge,Future of Religion, 312.72 Stark and Bainbridge,Future of Religion, 326.73 Lofland,Doomsday Cult, 51-53.74 Lofland,Doomsday Cult, 54-58; Stark and Bainbridge,Future of Religion, 321.
14
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
15/52
scholars have attempted to focus on the concept of status inconsistency to explain why
people joined the earliest churches, particularly, the Pauline churches. Here, the work of
Wayne A. Meeks is to be mentioned. Relying on certain anthropological studies, he
argues that the crucial factor in the formation of sectarian or millenarian movements is
more cognitive than in the proposal of the relative deprivation thesis. His idea is that
Pauls converts were mainly attracted to Pauls new millenarian messages because they
suffered from status inconsistency. By the term status inconsistency, Meeks seems to
mean that their achieved status was greater than their attributed status.75 Meeks states:
A millenarian movement looks forward to a series of events in the immediate
future that will radically transform the existing relationships of power, prestige,
and wealth. . . . They are almost invariably people who are not competing
successfully in the existing scheme of social transactions. Yet it is not enough to
say that it is deprived groups that develop millennial dreams. It is not their
absolute level of poverty or powerlessness that counts, but the way in which they
perceive their status relative to significant other groups.76
In this respect Meeks argues with a strong biblical advocate on relative
deprivation theory, John G. Gager:
I do not entirely understand John Gagers remarks (1979, 180). . . . Gagerproceeds to argue that some persons of relatively high social status, but few of
high social class were attracted to Christianity in the first two centuries. . . . The
concept of relative deprivation, which figures largely in hisKingdom and
Community (1975), is closely related to status inconsistency. But great precision
is needed.77
To explain the status inconsistency that Pauline churches felt in receiving Pauls
ideas of the millennium, Meeks relies on the concept of cognitive dissonance that was
75 Wayne A. Meeks, The First Urban Christians: The Social World of the Apostle Paul(New Haven: Yale
University Press, 1983) 73, 172-73. See also M. S. Sasaki, Status Inconsistency and ReligiousCommitment, in The Religious Dimension: New Directions in Quantitative Research, ed. Robert
Wuthnow (New York: Academic, 1979) 135-56. Meeks seems to rely on Webers ideas of status group.See Weber, Class, Status, Party, inFrom Max Weber, 180-95. Weber (Class, Status, Party, 193)
suggests that classes are stratified according to their relation to the production and acquisition of goods;
whereas status groups are stratified according to the principles of theirconsumption of goods as
represented by special styles of life. Emphasis is his.76 Meeks,First Urban Christians, 172.77 Meeks,First Urban Christians, 215, n. 20 of chapter 2. See John G. Gager,Kingdom and Community:
The Social World of Early Christianity (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1975).
15
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
16/52
created by their social experience. This theory is used in social psychology to refer to
mental distress arising from contradictions between ones deeply held beliefs and
expectations and the actual state of affairs.78
The cognitive dissonance theory with the status inconsistency thesis does not
seem to explain why some people were attracted to Pauls high-tension religious
movement. In particular, I who am concerned with the situations in 1 Thessalonians have
almost no information about individuals at Thessalonica on which to base conclusions
concerning the status inconsistency of the Thessalonian church. We cannot find any
distinct indication that in 1 Thessalonians the church members had achieved high social
status before their conversion. I believe Meeks argument around the concept of status
inconsistency fails to distinguish what is conceptually different between relative
deprivation and status inconsistency.
C. Conversion to Sect and Social Network Theory: The Importance of Interpersonal
Bonds
As Lewis R. Rambo suggests, conversion is what a group or person says it is.79
Rambo has already proposed a conversion model that includes cultural, social, personal,
and religious systems as its major components. His model of conversion has stages of:
context, crisis, quest, encounter, interaction, commitment, and consequences, focusing
more on the process itself instead of on ideologies and deprivation. Conversion is to be
78 Leon Festinger, Henry W. Riecken, and Stanley Schachter, When Prophecy Fails: A Social andPsychological Study of a Modern Group That Predicted the Destruction of the World(New York: Harper
& Row, 1964). See also Gager,Kingdom and Community, 37-43.79 Rambo, Understanding Religious Conversion, 7.
16
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
17/52
approached as a series of elements that are interactive and cumulative over time. 80 In
the interaction stage, he argues, personal relationships must provide a critical milieu for
the person to convert.81
For decades, social scientists have paid attention to how persons joined deviant
(or high-tension) religious groups. As I have reviewed earlier, the most popular
explanation for such a conversion couples deprivation with ideological appeal. However,
people usually do not join high-tension religious movements to compensate for their
deprivation.
In deviant act theory, scholars postulate that while some people deviate, others
conform to the mainline culture, because people differ in their stakes in conformity.82
Deviant behavior entails greater cost than conventional behavior. Thus, it seems fair to
suggest that most people do not join costly high-tension religious groups.83 Stakes in
conformity are those things at risk (which represent potential losses) when a person
deviates or fails to conform.84 Persons low in social relationships are more likely than
others to become members of a deviant religious group.85
Some scholars have considered deviant behaviors as a particular strain within an
otherwise unified cultural system in a given social order.86Such a perspective, rooted in
structural-functionalist logic, assumes that each society possesses a unified culture.
80 Rambo, Understanding Religious Conversion, 17.81 Rambo, Understanding Religious Conversion, 110.82
Stark and Finke,Acts of Faith, 117.83 Stark and Bainbridge, Theory of Religion, 205.84 Stark and Bainbridge, Theory of Religion, 190. They propose the following: persons with low stakes inconformity may incur minimal costs by deviating, and may, in turn, have much to gain from it. Persons
with low stakes in conformity are relatively free to deviate. For persons with low stakes in conformity,
conventional explanations tend to be evaluated negatively (Stark and Bainbridge, Theory of Religion,
191).85 Stark and Bainbridge, Theory of Religion, 234.86 See Stark and Bainbridge, Theory of Religion, 215. The work Robert K. Merton and Neil J. Smelser can
be categorized within this viewpoint.
17
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
18/52
However, any society has numerous cultural systems.87Since interest in a social network
arises as a reaction to structural/functional interpretations of social relationship,88 social
network theorists focus on how sets of people are linked by interpersonal ties to a variety
of cultural systems in a given society. These ties can be defined by sets of factors such as
duration of time, emotional intensity, mutual intimacy, and reciprocity.89 Mark
Granovetter, for example, poses that the strong ties are those of long duration, high
emotional intensity and great intimacy.90 These factors are also thought to be important
to the formation of any network between human beings.
The following work of Lofland and Stark is a good example of the importance of
social networks. Lofland and Stark investigated how Moonies recruited new members in
San Francisco.91 Because joining the Moonies was seen by most people as an act of
deviance, individuals who initially spent time with them learning their doctrines never
joined. In every instance these people continued to have strong attachments to
nonmembers who did not approve of the group. Of the people who did join, many were
newcomers to San Francisco whose attachments were all to people far away.92 The
basis for successful religious movements is, thus, growth through social networks,
87 Stark and Bainbridge, Theory of Religion, 218.88 Mark Granovetter, The Strength of Weak Ties,American Journal of Sociology 78 (1973): 1360-80;idem, The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited, Sociological Theory 1 (1983): 203-33;
Ronald Burt, Models of Network Structure,Annual Review of Sociology 6 (1980): 79-141; idem, Towarda Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure, Perception, and Action (New York:
Academic Press, 1982); Paul W. Holland and Samuel Leinhardt, eds.Perspectives in Social NetworkResearch (New York: Academic Press, 1976); and Nan Lin and Peter Marsden, eds. Social Structure and
Network Analysis (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1982).89 Granovetter, Strength, 1361.90 Granovetter, Network Theory Revisited, 213-17. However, what he is particularly concerned with isthe weak ties. While most social network theorists deal with strong ties, Granovetter tries to emphasize
the strength of weak ties. According to him (Strength, 1376), while strong ties are more likely to become
fragmented, weak ties tend to link members ofdifferentsmall groups than strong ties, which tend to be
concentrated within particular groups. Weak ties are indispensable to individuals opportunities and to
their integration into communities (Strength, 1378). Emphasis is his.91 Lofland and Stark, Becoming a World-Saver, 862-75.92 Stark,Rise of Christianity, 17.
18
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
19/52
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
20/52
These new insights can also be affirmed through studies of deviant acts.100 In this
field, there are mainly three perspectives: labeling theory, control theory, and learning
theory. Labeling theory focuses on the process of deviance, but does not explain why
some people are engaged in deviant acts. Deviant behavior is considered to be what
people label as reaction.101 This theory is not concerned with the origin of behavior, but
rather with characteristics of reactions from society.102
In control theory, generally resulting from Emil Durkheims insights, deviance
arises out of an absence of social control.103 Deviant acts happen when control over
individual conduct is lacking. Successive integration into relevant groups thus reduces
deviance.104
In learning theory deviant actions represent learned behavior.105 Deviants learn
this behavior through interaction with others in intimate personal groups. A person
becomes deviant because definitions that favor violating norms exceed definitions that
favor conforming to norms.106 The concept of socialization is essentially important in
learning theory, and it has been widely accepted among sociologists of deviance.107 I
think that this learning theory of deviance has also many implications for the issues
relating interpersonal relationships and conversion into a high-tension religious
perspective.
100 Alex Thio,Deviant Behavior, 4th ed. (New York: HarperCollins, 1995); Marshall B. Clinard and Robert
F. Meier, Sociology of Deviant Behavior, 10th ed. (Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace, 1998).101 Clinard and Meier, Sociology of Deviant Behavior, 128.102
Clinard and Meier, Sociology of Deviant Behavior, 129. Cf. Earl Rubington and Martin S. Weinberg,Deviance: The Interactionist, or Labeling Theory of Deviance, 6th ed. (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1996).103 Clinard and Meier, Sociology of Deviant Behavior, 135.104 Clinard and Meier, Sociology of Deviant Behavior, 140. See Travis Hirschi, Causes of Delinquency
(Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969).105 Ronald L. Akers,Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Perspective, 3rd ed. (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth,
1985); Edwin H. Sutherland, Donald R. Cressey, and David F. Luckenbill,Principles of Criminology , 11th
ed. (Chicago: General Hall, 1992).106 Clinard and Meier, Sociology of Deviant Behavior, 142-43. Quotation is from p. 143.107 Clinard and Meier, Sociology of Deviant Behavior, 144.
20
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
21/52
I would like to present one more concept in sociology of religious conversion,
religious capital. As in learning theory of deviant behaviors, the notion of
resocialization is very important to the conversion process. In this regard, scholars in
social networks and conversion attempt to study those who are recruited to and
resocialized in a new religious perspective. Following Pierre Bourdieus term cultural
capital, Stark and his colleagues coined religious capital as consisting of the degree
of mastery of and attachment to a particular religious culture.108 Any religious culture or
emotion a person keeps may be called religious capital. They then propose that the
greater their religious capital, the less likely people are either to reaffiliate or to
convert.109 People who are intensely socialized in a specific religious perspective usually
do not join other ones. Although this concept is extracted by research on modern
individualistic society, the concept itself can bear some fruit for the process of conversion
into a high-tension religious group.
D. Millenarianism
Until now, I have focused on why people adopt a deviant religious perspective.
Since the church-sect dichotomy has sharpened the notion of a sectarian religious
movement, deprivational theory has been a classical answer for this question. However,
social network theory on conversion supplements deprivational theory, establishing that
without interpersonal bonds with members of the group, people might not join that kind
of a deviant group.
108 Stark and Finke,Acts of Faith, 120. They redefine cultural capital as the investments or sunk costs
that culture represents to each individual.109 Stark and Finke,Acts of Faith, 121.
21
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
22/52
Departing from social network theory, Robert Wuthnow, who focuses on the roles
of crisis in the rise of ideological movements or social change, believes that social
network theorists do not necessarily examine the socio-cultural conditions out of which
high-tension movements emerge. Considering that new religious ideologies are shaped to
address crises in the moral order, he instead suggests that much attention be paid to the
broader structuring of resources in the social environment.110 Wuthnow accepts as
conceivable some of the insights of deprivational motives in a decision to join a high-
tension movement. He thinks that deprivation is, in fact, characteristic of the social order
itself. He believes disturbances in the moral order to be particularly important to
construct a new ideological perspective. Wuthnow adopts ideas of James C. Scott who
has found that colonial peasant societies operate by a moral economy. Scott argues
that a set of expectations and obligations about peasants, reciprocity in villages, social
choices in system of tenancy and attitudes toward taxes guard the peasant community
against subsistence crises.111 In these settings of moral economy, a subsistence crisis itself
would not necessarily result in new ideological movements.
However, when a structural change in the peasant economy occurs in a situation
where the systems of moral economy have become defective, then ideological questions
would be raised about the nature of the peasants moral obligations.112 Thus, Wuthnow
states:
Insofar as ideologies also require social resources in order to be maintained, any
disturbance of social resources that results in uncertainties about the nature of
moral obligations is likely to result in some modification at the level of ideologyitself. In other words, disturbances in the moral order are likely to be a factor in
110 Wuthnow, Meaning, 153.111 James C. Scott, The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia (New
Haven: Yale University Press, 1976) 204, 219-25. Wuthnow (Meaning, 154-56) summarizes well Scotts
ideas.112 Scott, Moral Economy, 114-56.
22
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
23/52
the production of new ideological forms.113
Wuthnows concern well suits the question of why a deviant group, and in particular, a
millenarian movement as an extreme form of high-tension movement, forms. With
regard to millenarian groups that expect the end of the present world order, scholars need
to stick to the relationships between structural change of the social order and the moral
obligations in ideology, while they still need to focus their attention to the importance of
social network in the formation of those groups.
Millenarianism has already fascinated many scholars in the field of sociology of
religion and New Testament studies. By definition, a millenarian religious movement is
one in which the participants believe that supernatural interventions will soon effect a
radical transformation of the conditions of life.114 These groups, in general, tend to be
marked by the following characteristics: beliefs about the promise of the imminent
coming of the millennium, or of the end of time; the complete reversal of the present
social order; the release of emotional energy; and the role of charismatic prophetic
leadership.115 All the activities of millenarian movements visualize some kind of
redemption, or release from current obligations through an inspiration regarded
locally as divine.116 This is because most millenarian movements seem to go through a
stage of anti-structure in which they reject the normal social and status structure of
113 Wuthnow, Meaning, 154. By ideology it is meant to contain propositions about moral obligations, i.e.,
obligations of patrons to clients, of clients to patrons, of members to communities, of citizens to states and
of state representatives to citizens, and so on (Wuthnow, Meaning, 154). Wuthnow goes on to say thatthese propositions specify how social relations should be conducted and therefore affect how social
resources may be distributed.114 Stark and Bainbridge, Theory of Religion, 210.115 I. C. Jarvie, The Revolution in Anthropology (Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1967) 51; Gager,Kingdom and
Community, 21; Michael J. St. Clair, Millenarian Movements in Historical Context(New York and
London: Garland, 1992) 51; Eric Hobsbawm,Primitive Rebels: Studies in Archaic Forms of SocialMovements in the 19th and 20th Centuries, 3rd ed. (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1971) 57.116 Kenelm Burridge,New Heaven, New Earth: A Study of Millenarian Activities (Oxford: Basil Blackwell,
1969) 99.
23
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
24/52
society.117 This form of a religious perspective thus provides alternate explanations
about how the state will be overthrown. Group members lives and beliefs reflect
relations between themselves and the elite,118 and the expected millennium is associated
with the entire group as a whole. Therefore, nonmembers, particularly, the elite of a
society will be deprived or punished.119
The similarities and differences between millenarianism and various other
ideological forms have been investigated. Revitalization movements are concerned with
religious or political ideology that collectively restores patterns of the disrupted moral
order.
120
In cargo cults, the entire group anticipates material goods.
121
Nativistic
movements resulting from nostalgic ideologies try to purify their members from the
influences of foreign customs.122 Having certain similar components as these movements,
millenarianism is thought to focus on preparing their members for the coming of the new
world.
Scholars customarily interpret millenarian movements as providing relief for
brutal conditions or suffering.123 First, scholars from a Marxist perspective seem to have
interpreted millenarian movements as a kind of protest by the economically and
politically oppressed who seek the overthrow of the present social order.124
Similarly, but focused more on the emotional character of millenarian
117 St. Clair, Millenarian Movements, 61.118 Stark and Bainbridge, Theory of Religion, 210. Here, the elite means the one who currently
monopolizes the cultural means of coercion.119
See Wuthnow, Meaning, 164.120 Anthony F. C. Wallace, Revitalization Movements,American Anthropologist58 (1956): 264-81.121 Peter Worsley, The Trumpet Shall Sound: A Study of Cargo Cults in Melanesia, 2nd ed. (New York:Schocken Books, 1968).122 Wuthnow, Meaning, 164, 233.123 In particular, scholars in relative deprivation theory have thought this way.124 Vittorio Lanternari, The Religions of the Oppressed: A Study of Modern Messianic Cults, trans. L. Sergio
(New York: Mentor, 1965); Worsley, The Trumpet Shall Sound; Hobsbawm,Primitive Rebels; and
Rosebeth Kanter, Commitment and Community: Communes and Utopias in Sociological Perspective
(Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1972).
24
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
25/52
movements, some scholars emphasize more the irrational character of the individual
member of such movements as in deprivational theory. Norman Cohn is representative
of this viewpoint. He is very critical of a Marxist approach to millenarianism that focuses
heavily on the impact of class conflict on the formation of the millenarian movement.125
Others think of millenarian movements as responses to the disruption of social
and cultural patterns.126 James A. Barkun argues that disaster and the hope of millennium
are correlated with each other, because disaster as a collective stress experience
provides a necessary condition for the formation of a millenarian movement.127
Contemporary scholars tend to think of millenarianism as a radical form of social
organization. Millenarian groups, by their nature, reject the social order in which they
reside, and are required to invest their loyalty and identity in a new order. A collective
existence located between the old order and the new order is typical of millenarianism.128
Millenarianism gives birth to what Victor Turner designates as structural liminality.129
It seems true that victims of a repressive state are more likely to join high-
tension religious movements.130 These people will tend to join millenarian religious
movements if the preconditions social network theorists propose are being met. As K.
Burridge states, power provokes a particular redemptive process in millenarian
125 Norman Cohn, The Pursuit of the Millennium: Revolutionary Messianism in Medieval and Reformation
Europe and Its Bearing on Modern Totalitarian Movements, 2nd ed. (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1961).126 James A. Barkun,Disaster and the Millennium (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974); Michael
Adas,Prophets of Rebellion: Millenarian Protest Movements against the European Colonial Order
(Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1979). Wuthnow can be categorized here, but he
attempts to synthesize all of three.127 Barkun,Disaster and the Millennium, 1-6, 111.128 David G. Bromley, Constructing Apocalypticism: Social and Cultural Elements of RadicalOrganization, in Millennium, Messiahs, and Mayhem: Contemporary Apocalyptic Movements, eds.
Thomas Robbins and Susan J. Palmer (New York and London: Routledge: 1997) 32-45. See also other
articles in this work.129 Victor Turner, The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977)
94-130.130 Stark and Bainbridge, Theory of Religion, 209; cf. Wuthnow, Meaning, 233. The term victims of a
repressive state is from the work of Stark and Bainbridge.
25
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
26/52
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
27/52
passages. Van Gennep has already proposed three stages of the initiation through ritual
as separation, transition and incorporation.135 However, scholars in millenarian religious
movements, even Burridge, remain unsuccessful to explain why and how people join
them.
Whether a Marxist perspective, relative deprivation theory, or an approach on
social disruption is correct in regard to the essential elements of the formation of a
millenarian movement, what is to be explained is why and how people join a very deviant
millenarian movement. Social network theory on conversion remains to help clarify the
origins of millenarianism.
It is Robert Jewett among scholars in New Testament sociology who has paid a
great deal of attention to the formation of a sectarian community at Thessalonica as a
radical form of social organization. He borrows ideas from relative deprivation theory to
posit why members of the congregation joined the group, and appropriates the
implications of a study of millenarian or messianic movements.136 Then he assumes that
a social polarization occurred in Thessalonica and this became an important factor for the
formation of the Thessalonian church.137 Some of the families in the villages became
of the framework of a millenarian movement. First, at issue is what happens when there is a transference .
. . from one symbolic code or map to another, from one social order to another. Second, associated with a
competing redemptive process, this transference is usually related with a new understanding of powerstructures that is likely to be a source of rebellious action. Third, the prophetic figure empowers the group
to see the contradictions of a particular social experience, affirms ideologies on the moral systems, and
lets them define what they are or want to be (Burridge,New Heaven, 164). Moral systems are called as
moral obligation (Wuthnow) or social world (Berger). On these three points, Burridge (New Heaven,
164) adds money as the hinge on which most millenarian activities seem to turn.135
Arnold Van Gennep, The Rites of Passages (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960).136 Robert Jewett, The Thessalonian Correspondence: Pauline Rhetoric and Millenarian Piety
(Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1986) 165-68. He argues that economic, social and even psychic and ethicaldeprivations Glock has proposed contributed to the groups feelings of being marginalized. Especially, he
draws on the work of Maria Isaura Pereira de Queiros (Messianic Myths and Movements,Diogenes 90
[1975]: 78-99), who has observed that modern-day messianic movements in Brazil and other places often
originate among a marginalized group within a society.137 Jewett (Thessalonian Correspondence, 167) describes the situation as follows: the city had been created
by joining a number of native villages that kept their identity in the neighborhoods of the city for centuries
after the founding. It is likely that the medium of continuity was the extended families and clans that made
27
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
28/52
socially dispossessed, and began to follow the apocalyptic visions of Paul. This is a good
reason, he believes, that in 1 Thessalonians there are many apocalyptic expectations. He
attempts to confirm that such a brutal socioeconomic situation often causes the socially
marginalized to turn toward a kind of millenarian perspective such as the one Paul
holds.138
However, Jewett has heavily relied on insights from relative deprivation
theory,139 and could not explain why in the initial stage of Pauls mission the
marginalized at Thessalonica decided to join Pauls high-tension religious movement,
because Paul states several times that they are destined to persecution. Even if we can
find some significant similarities between the Thessalonian church and typical
millenarian movements in general, we should keep focusing on why only some of
victims of a repressive state joined Pauls alternative, high-tension evkklhsi,a (1
Thess. 1:1).
E. Conclusion
I have tried to survey answers for one interesting question: why are people
up those original villages, . . . Some of these families were disadvantaged with the arrival of Romanbureaucrats, Latin immigrants, and ambitious Greek immigrants from other parts of the empire, and insofar
as they were unable to gain access to Thessalonian elite, would have constituted the type of pariah people
that Pereira de Queiros describes.138 Moreover, he argues that some enthusiasts (a;taktoi) who had been imbedded in the Cabirus cult
misunderstood Pauls proclamation of Christ and opposed him. However, in terms of religious capital, itseems less probable. If they had been faithfully imbedded in that Cabirus cult, they would have not
adopted Pauls high-tension religious perspective during the very short period of time Paul spent with them.If they were only nominal participants in the Cabirus cult or constrained to participate in the emperor cult,
it is more likely that they attempted to join Pauls high-tension movement. Jewetts interlocking idea lies
only in that they who had faithfully participated in the Cabirus cult in the village life, now co-opted by the
civic cult, misunderstoodPauls apocalyptic visions.139 Jewett doesnt distinguish the different types of deprivation. According to Glock, social deprivation
leads to church-like religious organization, not a high-tension religious group like the Thessalonian
community.
28
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
29/52
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
30/52
No matter what it attempts to explain, this approach concerns the processes by which
social actors interact with each other using symbols such as gestures, language, and so
on. That is, social interactions, which uphold social structure and mediate socialization,
are considered to be symbolic exchange relations between social actors.
Although it may not represent all the diverse branches of social psychology,
symbolic interactionism in particular is an important approach that connects self and
society. Symbolic interactionists such as G. H. Mead and H. Blumer stress the role of
language in social interaction. Language allows individuals to realize individuality so
that they become self-conscious beings in society. For example, according to Mead,
infants can only define themselves as I at an early age. As they get involved in social
interactions with others, they can, finally, objectify and define themselves as Me. In
this process, they learn the roles of themselves and others. In general, they become
societal members through socialization processes by which they internalize generalized
norms and values i.e., Generalized Other or culture. At last, they can conduct abstract
thinking, without specific objects, by internalizing symbols that represent objects, decide
what types of behaviors are appropriate, and interpret what meanings other peoples
behaviors have.140 In short, symbolic interactionism helps us to examine the processes by
which people make sense out of their behavior by focusing on the social interactions
between them.
John Lofland, one of the prominent symbolic interactionists, has shown that if
converts feel integrated in a religious group, then they are more inclined to take course of
actions in support of the group. Even when they are disappointed or depressed by the
140 See George Herbert Mead, Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist
(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934); J. D. Lewis, A Social Behaviorist Interpretation of the
Meadian I,American Journal of Sociology 85 (1979): 261-87.
30
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
31/52
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
32/52
between individuals. It does not successfully explain social change, conflicts between
social structures or cultures, births of deviant individuals or sub/counterculture, etc.,
because it seems to focus overly on harmonious interactions only.
B. Social Construction Approach
Next, I would like to focus on the phenomenological understanding of religion as
social construction by Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann. Bergers approach is in the
tradition of phenomenology together with Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, and Schutz. Their
focus was on ontology and epistemology i.e., the relationship between what exists or
objects and what to know or knowledge. Since the 1960s, Berger, together with
Luckmann, has claimed that worlds are socially constructed. In other words, reality that
people perceive and experience is not given from the transcendental being but is socially
located in society and differentially located across societies. This gave them the title,
constructivists because they viewed objects of our knowledge e.g., religious symbols,
traditions, beliefs, and so on as socially constructed in society.144 Applying their
constructivist perspective to varied social institutions and ideologies, Berger and
Luckmann examined the processes by which they are socially constructed. Especially,
they examined the processes by which people construct religious symbols by applying
their perspective to religion as a social institution.145
144 See Berger and Luckmann, Social Construction of Reality.145 Cultural perspective (social construction approach) and symbolic interactionism share some significant
resemblances, but we can make a distinction between the two. The latter is more inclined to describe how
social interaction itself is occurred among individuals, whereas the former focuses more on the structures or
cultures of social organizations that are constructed by individuals. Bergers approach tends to be overly
subjective rather than objective in its explanation because it does not discuss more objective conditions
such as social, economic, and political processes. Nonetheless, it does show the processes by which
seemingly objective constructs such as social institutions are constructed by subjective differences in
32
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
33/52
A religion constructed and sustained by religious groups in their cultural milieu,
however, may become vulnerable at any time, and needs to remain kept safely. It is
because, they accept, all socially constructed worlds are inherently precarious.146 In
this regard, the meaning structure of any given group always needs legitimation.
Legitimation belongs to the domain of social objectivations, that is, to what passes for
knowledge in a given collectivity.147 Religious legitimation purports to relate the
humanly defined reality to ultimate, universal and sacred reality.148 The firmer the
plausibility structure is, the firmer will be the world that is based upon it.149 Namely,
its plausibility structure is to be constantly sustained and maintained by the religious
group. Strong religion should maintain an ultimately valid ontological status within a
sacred and cosmic frame of reference.150
A problem of social engineering is critical for anyone who wishes to maintain
the reality of a particular religious system, and then he must maintain . . . an
appropriate plausibility structure.151 Therefore, the situations change significantly when
different religious systems, and their respective institutional carriers are in pluralistic
competition with each other.152 The individual who wish to stay converted must
dissociate himself from those individuals or groups that constituted the plausibility
structure of his past religious reality, and associate himself all the more intensively and
(if possible) exclusively with those who serve to maintain his new one.153
meanings, symbols, and so on.146 Berger, Sacred Canopy, 30.147 Berger, Sacred Canopy, 30.148 Berger, Sacred Canopy, 36-37.149 Berger, Sacred Canopy, 47.150 Berger, Sacred Canopy, 33.151 Berger, Sacred Canopy, 48.152 Berger, Sacred Canopy, 49.153 Berger, Sacred Canopy, 50-51.
33
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
34/52
In sum, religion could be defined as what is constituted and bounded by its
distinctive symbolic boundaries within its own social world or sacred cosmos. It is
actually a socially maintained cultural milieu. Strong religious groups are thus capable of
offering credible moral orders that create meanings for the lives of their members and
make their world significant. In this perspective, credibility and security are very
important, because it is the participants who must inhabit and sustain the sacred cosmos
and its distinctive set of normative orders of their own religious group, and suffer the
problem of delegitimation at any time. In this regard, strong religious groups that offer
secure and plausible moral orders seem to be placed, roughly speaking, in a socially and
demographically more Gemeinschafttype society than in a more Gesellschaft-type
society to avoid problems of delegitimation.154 It eventually leads to Bergers
secularization thesis that has been sharply criticized by rational choice theory.155
According to this approach, religious pluralism in a given society is thought to
undermine religious vitality, while monopoly environments are very helpful to promote
it. Capable religious groups should, thus, remain within demographically and socially
distant from the corrosiveness of modernity, within strong enclaves where vibrant sacred
moral orders can be sustained.156
154 Christian Smith,American Evangelicalism: Embattled and Thriving(Chicago and London: The
University of Chicago Press, 1998) 69.155
See Stark and Finke,Acts of Faith, 57-79. Rational choice theorists seem pleased to quote such remarksfrom Berger in his interview done in 1997: I think what I and most other sociologists of religion wrote in
the 1960s about secularization was a mistake. Our underlying argument was that secularization andmodernity go hand in hand. With more modernization comes more secularization. It wasnt a crazy
theory. There was some evidence for it. But I think its basically wrong. Most of the world today is
certainly not secular. Its very religious. I requote it from Stark and Finke,Acts of Faith, 79. Originally,
this interview is in Peter L. Berger, Epistemological Modesty: An Interview with Peter Berger, ChristianCentury 114 (1997): 974.156 Christian Smith,American Evangelicalism , 69. Christian Smith labels this theory as the the sheltered
enclave theory (American Evangelicalism , 67).
34
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
35/52
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
36/52
from the Weberian perspective in particular. Thus, some scholars criticize that this
approach has much difficulty to explain the changes in social structures and social
institutions based on other types of social actions.160 Further, it does not explain how
social systems evolve according to their own mechanisms at the macro level because it
overemphasizes how macro structures are emerged from micro (inter)actions.161
Although it has such weaknesses proposed above, rational choice theory does
have good implications for the examination of the maintenance of religious groups. Let
me specify some characteristics of this theoretical tradition applicable to the study of
religion.
First of all, this theory finds free rider problems very important to the issue of
the maintenance of religious groups. It notices a tension between individual believers
who behave based on rational calculation and religious groups or group features that are
jointly produced goods such as communal worship, sacrament, music, warm
encouragement through friendship, etc. that need, for their maintenance, collective
cooperation of their participants. That is, religious believers try to minimize the costs of
their commitments to their groups while they seek to benefit maximally from the groups
in which they participate.162
As a natural consequence of this tension, certain forms of group properties
emerge to resolve the dilemma of free rider. For example, group members create or
heighten group solidarity by regulating the free riders so that they can safeguard the
structures of producing joint goods.163 Such free riders are most likely to enjoy many of
160 Christian Smith, Moral, Believing Animals: Human Personhood and Culture (Oxford and New York:
Oxford University Press, 2003) 114161 Cf. Donald P. Green and Ian Shapiro,Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of
Applications in Political Science (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996).162 Stark and Finke,Acts of Faith, 147-50.163 See Mancur Olson, The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965);
36
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
37/52
the benefits of the religious group, with regard to their likeliness to contribute little to
their group.
Moreover, the larger the congregation becomes, the higher the proportion of
free-riders increases, because it is self-evidently true that the obverse of weak intra-
group social ties is strong external ties.164 Stark and Finke explain this kind of self-
evident religious phenomena as in their own terms:
The less dense the networks within a congregation, the stronger the ties maintained to
external networks.
The more prevalent member ties to external networks, the greater the pressure on the group
to reduce tension.165
Laurence R. Iannaccone has thus recognized that regulations requiring costs of
every member (set out by the strict religious groups in his term) would be efficient to
prevent free-riding problems, and screening free-riders would help make religious
commitment higher. Iannaccone argues that strict religions more easily screen out free
riders so that their religious vitality can be maintained.166 Only strong religious groups
that are able to screen out free riders enjoy high degrees of commitment, investment,
solidarity, and mutual-rewards, all of which make those groups thrive and grow.167
Secondly and further, Stark and Finke posit that the level of religious commitment
is associated with the tension between religious groups and their environments. As I have
reviewed earlier, based on Benton Johnsons simplified formulation of church-sect in
Michael Hechter,Principles of Group Solidarity (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California
Press, 1987).164 Stark and Finke,Acts of Faith, 161.165 Stark and Finke,Acts of Faith, 161-62. These are their propositions 56, 57.166 Laurence R. Iannaccone, Why Strict Churches Are Strong,American Journal of Sociology 99 (1994):
1180-1211.167 Christian Smith,American Evangelicalism , 72.
37
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
38/52
terms of a groups tension with its socio-cultural environment, they theorize that there is
a reciprocal relationship between the tension and the value of the rewards of
membership.168 The lower the tension is, the more the religious groups are likely to view
god as a detached and unresponsive entity. In contrast, higher-tension groups are more
likely to give greater reward to religious consumers, because they are precious, so it
would be rational for them to prefer a higher-priced supplier after their religious
motivations have been made in their religious lives. Religious vitality is made not
because group members have been resocialized to a high level of commitment to deviant
groups but because such high-tension groups offer more reward to themselves.
169
In contrast, lower-tension groups are more likely to be full of free riders who want
to enjoy many benefits more than they contribute. In such groups, religious collective
benefits including mutual support and fellowship, etc., become fewer and this leads to
more disinterest and less participation among the group members.170
Thirdly, Stark and Finke emphasize on the aspects of religious economies,
because they believe that the religious subsystem of any society is entirely parallel to the
subsystem involved with the secular (or commercial) economy, and both involve the
interplay of supply and demand for valued products.171 Here, religious economies is
defined as what consists of a market of current and potential followers (demand), a set
168 Stark and Finkes propositions 42-48.169 Rational choice theorists also posit that the more religious capital people have developed in a specific
religion, the more likely they are to stay because it is more rational for them to stay there because that
religion offers more benefits or religious goods than others whose religious capital they have not developedsufficiently. It remains theoretically true, but I have not summarized this trait here in detail because the
Thessalonian churches were almost entirely Gentiles who had not known about Judeo-Christian religioustraditions at that time and were very young in terms of the time of their conversion (cf. 1 Thess. 1:9).
Namely, their Christian religious capital was low. This aspect seems to be more connected with the issue
of the group formation, namely, the ways in which Pauls social networking enabled them to join the
Christian group as will be described in the chapters to follow.170 They theorize that such impersonal god conceived of by lower-tension (churchlike) groups is not
rewarding as an exchange partner (Stark and Finke,Acts of Faith, 91, 98-100).171 Stark and Finke,Acts of Faith, 35-36.
38
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
39/52
of organizations (suppliers) seeking to serve that market, and the religious doctrines and
practices (products) offered by the various organizations.172 One of their critical
arguments is that religious demand is relatively stable over time.173 It is based upon the
principle called homophily principle which means that people tend to associate with
people similar to themselves.174
Rational choice theorists basic claim, thus, seems to be that religious regulation
and monopolies create lethargic religions, but that within a competitive free religious
market, capable religions thrive.175 Christian Smith summarizes well their basic
arguments as follows:
capable religions thrive because their religious entrepreneurs capitalize onunregulated religious environment to aggressively market their religions to new
consumers; in these environments, religious firms (denominations and traditions)
that possess superior organizational structures (denominational polities), sales
representatives (evangelists and clergy), products (religious messages), and marketing(evangelistic) techniques flourish.176
What we can come by as typical in their reasoning is that with pluralism and
competition, at the aggressive level, the total amount of religious participation in the
society increases, since more and more religious consumers are induced into participation
by the variety of religious products that satisfy their needs and wants.177 They propose
172 Stark and Finke,Acts of Faith, 36.173 Stark and Finke,Acts of Faith, 193.174
Stark and Finke think that voluntary organizations are rooted in specific homophilus niches.Moreover, to the degree that a religious economy is unregulated and market forces prevail, these niches
will be quite visible, and each will sustain a set of specialized religious bodies (Stark and Finke,Acts of
Faith, 195).175 Christian Smith,American Evangelicalism , 73. Their theory can also be called competitive marketing,
religious economies, or supply-side theory. And even in non-competitive or sacralized religious
market such as in the Roman empire, religious vitality of any small but capable group can be seen as
proposed above.176 Christian Smith, American Evangelicalism, 73.177 Christian Smith, American Evangelicalism, 73.
39
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
40/52
that market niche is very important. Here, the term market niches is meant to be
market segments of potential adherents sharing particular religious preferences (needs,
tastes, and expectations).178
The successful maintenance of religious groups can easily be led from
unregulated religious environments through which active religious firms can expand
market niches to promote more diverse supplies of religious products that satisfy ever-
expanding markets of religious consumers.179
One more thing to be considered. The relationship between the religious monopoly
and the vitality of new religion has also been proposed:
To the degree that a religious firm achieves a monopoly, it will seek to exert its influence
over other institutions, and the society will thus be sacralized.180
The capacity of a single religious firm to monopolize a religious economy depends upon
the degree to which the state uses coercive force to regulate the religious economy.181
The term sacralized here can be borrowed to explain such situations as in which people
can find little differentiation between religious and secular institutions and in which
the primary aspects of life, from family to politics, are suffused with religious symbols,
rhetoric, and ritual.182 Therefore, because no single religious organization can achieve
monopoly through voluntary assent in any society, religious monopolies rest upon
coercion.183
178 Stark and Finke,Acts of Faith, 195.179 Christian Smith, American Evangelicalism, 74.180 It is their proposal 73.181 Stark and Finke,Acts of Faith, 199. It is also true that even in highly regulated religious economies
limited to a single monopoly faith, these niches will exist, if less distinctly, and in such monopoly
situations, religious deviants seem to have little trouble finding receptive consumers (Stark and Finke,Acts of Faith, 195, 197).182 Stark and Finke,Acts of Faith, 199.183 Stark and Finke,Acts of Faith, 199.
40
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
41/52
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
42/52
it.188
In sum, within the reasoning of rational choice theory, as Christian Smith
evaluates, at the macro level, religious vitality is the product of pluralistic, competitive
religious economies, while religious weakness is the product of highly regulated
religious environments that discourage competition. And at the micro level of religious
congregations, vitality is the result of skilled and aggressive religious activists marketing
their religious products to newly responsive and satisfied market niches of religious
consumers. 189
D. Conclusion
I have reviewed and evaluated some important sociological approaches on how
deviant (or high-tension) religious groups can maintain their religious vitality. There are
quite different assumptions and thinking on why people get into such deviant groups
from each theory. With regard to the group maintenance, however, some theories share
several characteristics with which they argue for the essential aspects of the groups to
keep alive.
Still, we can figure out differences of the underlying assumptions of two
opposing paradigms on how religious vitality can be achieved in conjunction with
groups socio-cultural environments. As Christian Smith and many others believe, I also
evaluate that rational choice theory presents the best orienting framework and set of
assumptions for the study of the formation and maintenance of religious groups.190
188 Christian Smith, American Evangelicalism, 74.189 Christian Smith, American Evangelicalism, 74.190 Christian Smith, American Evangelicalism, 85.
42
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
43/52
Religious pluralism may not be an obstacle to religious vitality. Rather, it can
give weight to some basic points for the religious vitality to come true with the help of
the theory of Stark and Finke. Not all the details in their theory might be true. However,
basic arguments are thought to be supported by empirical materials and experiences
among religious groups as such: deep connections of socio-cultural environment with
tension, how to deal with free riders in groups, and religious pluralisms positive
functions to religious vitality, etc. Even their theory is by nature interdisciplinary,191 and
shares several explanatory characteristics with those from other scholarly fields, some of
which I have reviewed. With the evaluation of Christian Smith, my position also is to
think that the rational choice theory formulates a theoretical account of why and how
religion survives and can thrive and explains variations in religious vitality among
different religious traditions than any other theoretical traditions.192 However, scholars
still think that arguments of rational choice theory on this issue are too much based upon
economic assumptions. As humans are not always at bottom calculating, consuming
animals, rather, moral, believing animals,193 the economistic language of exchange-
based rational-choice theory seems, thus, somewhat problematic to be employed without
any hesitation, and a noneconomic language drawn from insights of the other fields that
have been reviewed above needs to be included for the study of religious vitality.194
191 They favor to call it a general theory of explanation.192 Christian Smith, American Evangelicalism, 118.193 Christian Smith, Moral, Believing Animals, 114.194
Some wordings are from Christian Smith, American Evangelicalism, 118. With these insights from thework of Stark and his fellows, Christian Smith tries to deepen its theoretical framework. Christian Smiths
subcultural identity theory that tries to make rational choice version of religious vitality complete is asfollows: Propositions 1-8; 1. The human drives for meaning and belonging are satisfied primarily by
locating human selves within the social groups that sustain distinctive, morally orienting collective
identities. 2. Social groups construct and maintain collective identities by drawing symbolic boundaries
that create distinction between themselves and relevant outgroups. 3. Religious traditions have always
strategically renegotiated their collective identities by continually reformulating the ways their constructed
orthodoxies engage the changing sociocultural environments they confront. 4. Because the socially
normative bases for identity-legitimation are historically variable, modern religious believers can establish
43
8/14/2019 Sung Eun Lee Dissertation II. Sociological Understanding of Group Formation
44/52
Aside from economistic language, there are a lot of insights and explanatory powers
within this tradition. Its basic arguments remain correct.
With the insights from these reviews and evaluations in mind, I would, thus, like
to focus more on the social context of Paul and his church at Thessalonica in the next
chapter.
stronger religious identities and commitments on the basis of individual choice than through ascription. 5.Individuals and groups define their values and norms and evaluate their identities and actions in relation to
specific, chosen reference groups; dissimilar and antagonistic outgroups may serve as negative reference
groups. 6. Modern pluralism promotes the formation of strong subcultures and potentially deviant
identities, including religious subcultures and identities. 7. Intergroup conflict in a pluralistic contexttypically strengthens in-group identity, solidarity, resources mobilization, and membership retention. 8.
Modernity can actually increase religion's appeal, by creating social conditions which intensify the kinds offelt needs and desires that religion in especially well-positioned to satisfy (American Evangelicalism , 90,
91, 97, 102, 104, 107, 113, 116). His subcultural identity theory is worth listening, but its basic arguments
still seem similar to the main points of rational choice theory (or social network theory). Economistic
language being put aside, rational choice theory and subcultural identity