50
Summer University Implementing city and citizen friendly electric vehicles 14 -16 May 2014 Palma (Mallorca) Dr. Liana Cipcigan Cardiff University, School of Engineering

Summer University - GITMOTgitmot.uib.es/SummerUniversityII/documentos/presentaciones/Day 2/2... · Smart Cities Electromobility as ... North East and Milton Keynes; then extended

  • Upload
    ngobao

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Summer University

Implementing city and citizen friendly electric vehicles

14 -16 May 2014

Palma (Mallorca)

Dr. Liana Cipcigan

Cardiff University, School of Engineering

2

My Background

• Member of CIREGS –Centre for Integrating Renewable Energy Generation and Supply

• Member of Electric Vehicle Centre of Excellence, Leader of the Energy Management Theme

• Invited Expert of Working Group Smart Charging under CEN/CENELEC M468 and M490

• Member of WG p.2030.1, Guide for Transportation Electrification, IEEE Standards Association

• Member of the Low Carbon Vehicles Steering Group, Welsh Government

• PI of the projects

– EPSRC - Smart Management of Electric Vehicles

– EPSRC - Electric Vehicle Value Chain, Bridging the gaps

– TSB - Agent-based controllers for electric vehicles and microgenerators

– TSB - Ebbs and Flows of Energy Systems

• Member of the projects

– EPSRC – Grid Economics, Planning and Business Models for Smart Electric Mobility

– ICT-Smart Energy Grids - MAS2TERING - Multi-Agent Systems and Secured coupling of Telecom and Energy gRIds for

Next Generation smart grid services

– IEE - eBRIDGE: empowering e-fleets for business and private purposes in cities

– IEE - I CVUE : Incentives for Clean Vehicles in Urban Europe

– COST ARTS Autonomic Road Transport Systems

– FP7 - MERGE Mobile Energy Resources in Grids of Electricity

– INTERREG - ENEVATE European network on electric vehicles and transferring expertise

– UKERC - Scenarios for the development of smart grids in the UK

– EADS - Innovation Works - SCADA Cyber Security Lifecycle

3

MARKET

Electrical Infrastructure

“Intelligence” Infrastructure

Transportation/Charging Infrastructure

Smart Grid a Network of Networks

4

Cardiff University Integrated approach of EVs

integration

Intelligent infrastructure / Smart Grids

INTEGRATED MODEL

New

products

New clients

New

technologies,

new suppliers

How will the

market respond?

How do I sell

these?

What if something

breaks?

Range anxiety;

cost

Who invests?

Who makes

money?

What’s in it for us?

Do we need more

capacity?

Smart grids?

5

Why go Electric?

Independent drivers for E-mobility

Energy: Smart Grids Transport:

Sustainable urban mobility

Smart Cities

Electromobility as part of the Smart Grid

• As mobile loads, sufficient energy to charge the

electric car

• Control charging

•Electric car as storage devices

Electromobility as integral part of urban mobility

• CO2 reduction through electric car

• Complete urban mobility through integration if

individual and public transport

•Infrastructure interdependencies

6

Is charging an Electric Vehicle

as simple as plugging in?

Analysis, Electricity grid

– How many EV? – EV uptake scenarios, impact on generation system, impact on

distribution networks

– When will they charge? – temporal analysis

– Where will they connect for charging? – spatial analysis

Evaluation & Control, EV smart charging

– What are the infrastructure challenges of EV fleet?

– What are the options for managing the spatial-temporal nature of the load?

– What is the role of the Aggregator?

– Intelligent charging?

– Synergies with Smart Grids?

Electricity and Transport systems integration

– EV as a link between the electricity and transport systems

7

• Plugged-in Places (PiP) program (2011-2013) provided match-funding worth £30 million for the

installation of charging points - London, North East and Milton Keynes; then extended to Northern

Ireland, Scotland, Greater Manchester, Midlands and East of England

• Stimulated private investment in the sector (non-PiP CPs now represent around 70% of installed points).

• Half of public PiP charge points are rated at 7kW (~50%), followed by 3kW units (~45%), while ‘fast’ and

‘rapid’ CPs (20kW+ AC and 40kW+ AC and DC) only account for a small proportion of the network

(~5%, < 100 50kW DC).

Drivers for EV uptake

Charging infrastructure

Element Energy, Pathways to high

penetration of electric vehicles, Final report

for The Committee on Climate Change,

December 2013

8

Charging infrastructure

9

Drivers for EV uptake

Policy and support measures

Element Energy, Pathways to high penetration of electric vehicles, Final report for The Committee

on Climate Change, December 2013

10

From a power system viewpoint, Electric Vehicles (EVs) may be seen as:

• Simple loads, drawing a continuous current from the electricity network.

• Flexible loads that may allow a management company to interrupt or coordinate their

battery charging procedure.

• Storage devices that may allow a management company to interrupt or coordinate their

charging procedure, or even request power injections from their batteries back to the grid. The

latter is known as Vehicle to Grid (V2G) concept.

Our Research

• Impact of EV battery charging on grid demand at a national level.

• Impact of EV battery charging on distribution networks.

• Intelligent control algorithms for coordination of EV battery charging.

Electric Vehicles and

Power Networks

11

How are the load shape and peaks going to be

affected with EV battery charging?

12

Impact on Grid Demand Peaks

at National Level

Spain Great Britain

Wit

ho

ut

EV

s (6

9.9

GW

)

Lo

w E

V U

pta

ke

Un

co

ntr

oll

ed

Du

al

Tari

ff

Vari

ab

le P

rice

Mix

ed

Ch

arg

ing

Wit

ho

ut

EV

s (7

0.1

GW

)

Lo

w E

V U

pta

ke

Un

co

ntr

oll

ed

Du

al

Tari

ff

Vari

ab

le P

rice

Mix

ed

Ch

arg

ing

+3.2 +1.5 +4.9

+1 +1.6 +1.5 +2.1

120

100

80

60

40

20

0 Peak

Ele

ctr

icit

y D

em

an

d (

GW

)

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Peak

Ele

ctric

ity D

em

an

d (G

W)

Un

co

ntr

oll

ed

Du

al

Tari

ff

Vari

ab

le P

rice

Mix

ed

Ch

arg

ing

Hig

h E

V U

pta

ke

Un

co

ntr

oll

ed

Du

al

Tari

ff

Vari

ab

le P

rice

Mix

ed

Ch

arg

ing

+38 +37 +39

+10

+41

+30 +27

+54

Hig

h E

V U

pta

ke

P. Papadopoulos, O. Akizu, L. M. Cipcigan, N. Jenkins, E. Zabala,

Electricity Demand with Electric Cars: Comparing GB and Spain, Proc. IMechE Vol. 225 Part A: J. Power and Energy, pp.551-566, (2011)

Ref

13

Selected Results and Conclusions

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Ele

ctri

city

Dem

and

(GW

)

Dem

and

wit

ho

ut

EV

s

Dem

and

wit

ho

ut

EV

s

3.2

Lo

w E

V

Up

tak

e

4.9

Lo

w E

V

Up

tak

e

Inst

alle

d G

ener

atio

n

Inst

alle

d G

ener

atio

n

40%

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Electricity D

eman

d

(GW

)

32%

Eff

ecti

ve G

ener

atio

n

Eff

ecti

ve G

ener

atio

n

GB SPAIN

67%

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

Ele

ctri

city

Dem

an

d (

GW

)

Time of Day

GB/ Winter Season

Uncontrolled Mixed Charging Dynamic Price Dual Tariff Base Case

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

Ele

ctri

city

Dem

an

d (

GW

)

Time of Day

Spain/ Winter Season

14

~ 3mil cars of ~42mil vehicle fleet

(7% Low market EV penetration prediction)

• Isn’t enough to make a real impact on energy demand at

the national level

• EVs impact is expected to be at the local level

• Impact on LV distribution hotspots depends on

clustering

EV impact on Generation

at National Level

15

Medium Voltage

Network

Low Voltage

Network

Parking

Area

Parking

Area

Parking

Area

How are the distribution network equipment and operating parameters going to be

affected with EV battery charging?

Transformer

Key

Power Network

Communications Network

EV charging point

Electric Vehicle Smart Meter

T Distributed Generation

Impact of EV battery charging

on Distribution Networks

16

Assumed EV Uptake Levels in 2030

Low EV uptake

(12.5% of residences)

Medium EV uptake

(33.3% of residences)

High EV uptake

(70.8% of residences)

11kV/

0.433kV

Source

500 MVA

33/11.5kV

~

96 residences

384 residences

3072 residences

UK Generic Distribution Network

Residential charging of EV batteries will overload distribution networks and modify voltage

profile of feeders.

The distribution transformer was found to be overloaded for medium and high EV

penetration.

The voltage limits would be violated for medium and high EV penetrations.

The 185mm2 cable was found to be overloaded for most 2030 cases.

The results from this research are used for the design of algorithms to allow the efficient

management of charging infrastructure

Papadopoulos P, Skarvelis-Kazakos S, Grau I, Cipcigan LM, Jenkins N, Electric vehicles' impact on British distribution networks, IET Electrical Systems in Transportation , 2 (3)

(2012) 91-102

Ref

Impact of EV battery charging

on UK generic distribution network

17

EV Load Forecast

• Accurate Forecasts: Critical Component for the successful control

• Feedback Loop necessary to improve the forecast.

• The electricity demand will increase due to the recharging of the batteries

• EVs impact is expected to be at the local level creating hotspots depending on EV

clustering

• Smart Management of Electric Vehicles charging

18

Influential Factors-Attributes

• Connection time

• Disconnection Time

• Seasonality

• Periodicity

• Average charging demand

• Weather

• Charging Mode

• Battery capacity

• Travel patterns

• Electricity price

Big variation

Artificial

Intelligence methods

EV Load Forecast

19

Case study

United Kingdom

• Around 15,000 Charging Events

• Domestic, Commercial and Public Charging

Events

• 396 EV owners

• 200 Charging Stations

• Geographical Location of each Station

• Charging Rates and Technical Specifications

of most stations

• Total Energy 1242 MWh

20

Distribution of Charging Rates

for each Parking

21

Average Charging Demand Profile

per Week

22

EV Average Daily Charging Demand

Train dataset

Test Dataset

23

Forecast of the Average Daily EV Charging

24

Case Study

France

24

Real Charging Events

• Paris

• 71 EVs

• Public EV chargers

• 27/4/2011 until 29/2/2012

• 3113 charging events

• Total Energy 34577 kWh

• 11.10kWh Average Energy per charge

event

E Xydas, C Marmaras, L M Cipcigan, A S Hassan, N Jenkins, “Forecasting Electric Vehicles Charging Demand Using Support Vector

Machines”, presented in UPEC 2013, Dublin

E Xydas, C Marmaras, L M Cipcigan, A S Hassan, N Jenkins, “Electric Vehicle Load Forecasting Using Data Mining Methods”, 4th

Hybrid and Electric Vehicle IET Conference (HEVC 2013), London

25

Case Study

France

26

Case Study

The EV project (USA)

The EV Project

• The largest deployment of

electric vehicle charge

infrastructure in history

• 7937 EVs were enrolled

until now

• Over 2.3 million charging

events

• 8,278 Residential EVSE

Installed

• 3,166 Commercial

• 76 DC Fast Chargers

E Xydas, C Marmaras, L M Cipcigan, A S Hassan, N Jenkins, “Forecasting Electric Vehicles Charging Demand Using Support Vector Machines”, presented in

UPEC 2013, Dublin

E Xydas, C Marmaras, L M Cipcigan, A S Hassan, N Jenkins, “Electric Vehicle Load Forecasting Using Data Mining Methods”, 4th Hybrid and Electric Vehicle

IET Conference (HEVC 2013), London

27

Energy per charge event

Residential

Private

Non-Residential

Public

28

Charging Stations’ usage

Residential

Private

Non-Residential

Public

29

Next Day EV Load Forecast

ANN SVM

MAPE 5.38 4.65

RMSE 70.91 67.05

r 0.97 0.98

It was estimated in the U.K.

power system that every 1%

increase in the forecasting

error costs 10 million pounds

per year*.

*M. Matijaš, M. Vukićcević, and S. Krajcar, “Supplier

Short Term Load Forecasting Using Support Vector

Regression and Exogenous Input” Journal of Electrical

Engineering, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 280–285, Sep. 2011

30 * Virtual Power Plant Concept in Electrical Networks. Juan Martí (2007) [FENIX project]

Smart Management of EVs Charging

Virtual Power Plant

• EVs ???

*

Ref

31

Electric Vehicle Supplier / Aggregator

Basic Functions

•Individual EVs have small power

capabilities; therefore their

participation in the electricity and

ancillary services markets will

require a new entity: the EV

Aggregator (EVA).

•The EVA will serve as an

intermediary between large number

of EVs and market players and/or

system operators.

•EV Aggregator: Entity which sells

electricity to the EV owners,

aggregates and manages their load

demand.

32

Interaction between the VPP Control Center and the VPP resources,

DSO, TSO and market in the direct control approach

Direct Control Architecture

A. F. Raab, M. Ferdowsi, E. Karfopoulos, I. Grau Unda, S. Skarvelis-Kazakos, P.

Papadopoulos, E. Abbasi, L.M. Cipcigan, N. Jenkins, N. Hatziargyriou, and K. Strunz,

Virtual Power Plant Control Concepts with Electric Vehicles, ISAP 2011, Crete, 2011

33

Hierarchical Control Architecture

Interaction between the VPP control center and the VPP resources,

DSO, TSO and market in the hierarchical approach

34

Distributed Control Architecture

Interaction between the VPP control center and the VPP resources,

DSO, TSO and market in the distributed control approach

35

Modelling Framework

Control Techniques

Optimization

• Reach the optimal

solution, with given

constraints

Machine Learning

• Data Mining

• Behavior Analysis

Game Theory

• Cooperative/Non-

cooperative Games

between the EVs

• Bidding/Auction

Games for the EV

aggregators

36

Location of agents in a power distribution system

MAS design aims

Satisfy EV owner preferences according to:

• Distribution network technical constraints.

• Electricity prices.

P. Papadopoulos PhD thesis

Example

Hierarchical Control

37

Medium Voltage

Network

Low Voltage

Network

Parking

Area

Parking

Area

Parking

Area

PHYSICAL LAYER

VIRTUAL LAYER

p

a

n

pan

Power

Flow

Load

Forecasting

EV

EV

EV

EV

EV

EV

EV

EV

EV

EV

EV

EV

EV

EV

EV

EV

EV

Local

Aggregator

agent

Regional

Aggregator

agent

DSO

agent

Operation of the Agent Based

Control System

38

Resources Used

Laboratory of Tecnalia

User

Interface

Vehicle

Controller

Connection

Cable

Inverter

SoC Estimator

Batteries

User

Interface

Charging

Point

Controller

Power

Quality

Meter

Connection

Switch

Smart

Meter

Avtron K595

Load Bank

Avtron Millenium

Load Bank

GaugeTech

DMMS300

Measurement Device

EV-ON

Platform

Hardware Resources

Software Resources

1. EV-ON Platform software was used for:

• State of Charge (SoC) measurement acquisition

• Set-point application

2. Communication Software for Distributed Energy Resources (CSDER) was used to:

• Monitor and switch on/off the load banks’ steps

• Acquire measurements from the DMMS300 measurement device

P. Papadopoulos PhD thesis

39

Experimental Evaluation of Hierarchical Control

(Papadopoulos PhD thesis)

~

Residential

Feeder

Grid Supply

33/

11.5kV

..

. ...

HV/MV

Substation

Level

Medium

Voltage

Level

Low

Voltage

Level

11/

0.433kV

MV/LV

Substation

Level

Key

Agent

15,360

Residential

Customers

(Lumped)

288

Residential

Customers

and 96 EVs

(Lumped)

EV

EV

EV

EV

Local

Aggregator

Regional

Aggregator

DSO

2,688

Residential

Customers

and 96 EVs

(Lumped)

UK Generic LV

Distribution

Network

Software Layer

Physical Layer

Key

Normal Operation Emergency Operation Monitoring Control Electrical

Communication Communication Connections

DMMS Avtron Millenium Avtron K595 EV-ON

300 Load Bank Load Bank Platform

~ Grid

Supply

400V/

50Hz

Agent

EV

DSO

Load Banks

Controller

EV

31 simulated

EV agents

CSDER (IEC 61850)

EV

Local

Aggregator

. . .

Regional

Aggregator

Create an equivalent of the residential feeder

24 Residential Customers

Equivalent

8 EVs Equivalent

P. Papadopoulos PhD thesis

40

Experiment Conditions Purpose

Experiment 1 Normal operating conditions

To evaluate the MAS operation during normal

operating conditions aiming to follow the electricity

price signals.

Experimental Evaluation of Hierarchical Control

(Papadopoulos PhD thesis)

Experimental Results

20

60

100

140

180

220

260

06:00 10:00 14:00 18:00 22:00 02:00 06:00

Fee

der

Lo

ad

ing (

kW

)

Time of Day

Feeder Limit Actual Load

Measured Load

Load without EVs

Reference Case: No Control Experiment 1: Normal operation

Experiment Conditions Purpose

Experiment 2

Normal operating conditions,

aiming to minimise the EV load

demand in a specific hour

To evaluate the MAS operation when the demand

reduction would be required in the LV area, during a

specific hour.

Experiment 2: Demand reduction

40 P. Papadopoulos PhD thesis

41

Experiment Conditions Purpose

Experiment 3

Normal operating conditions and

allowing EVs to provide power

back to the grid

To evaluate the MAS operation when power

injections would be required from the specific LV

area, during a specific hour.

Experimental Results

Experiment 1: Normal operation Experiment 3: V2G

41

Experimental Evaluation of Hierarchical Control

(Papadopoulos PhD thesis)

42

Workplace Area

Experiments conducted:

a) Validated operation.

b) Technical invalidation.

c) Emergency operation.

d) Demand reduction

service.

EV

agent

EV

agent

EV

agent

EV

agent

EV

agent

EV

agent

Local Area

agent

Coordinator

agent

11/0.433kV

DSO agent

33/11.5kV

Grid Supply

500MVA

UK Generic LV Distribution Network

...

Coordinator

agent

Local Area

agent

Communication Software for Distributed Energy Resources

Grid Supply

400V/50Hz

EV

agent

EV

agent

EV

agent

EV

agent

Laboratory

configuration

Load Bank Controller agent

Normal

Operation

Emergency

Operation

Monitor

Key:

DSO

agent

42

Experimental Evaluation of Centralised Control

(Grau PhD thesis)

43

Economic Optimisation Demand Reduction

Transformer Loading without EVs (kW) Transformer Loading Limit (kW) Electricity Prices (p/kWh)

Transformer Loading with EVs – µGrid Emulator Output (kW) Transformer Loading with EVs – µGrid Actual Output (kW)

EV-ON Demand

Tests Executed

Emergency Operation

Experimental Evaluation of MAS – Centralised

Control (Grau PhD thesis)

44

Optimal choice of the Charging

Control Model

- Location/Demographic Characteristics

- Network Technical Characteristics

- Cost

- Expandability

Conclusions

Smart Management of Electric Vehicles Charging

Control Options

a. Distributed

b. Hierarchical

c. Centralized

Charging options

a. Uncontrolled

- Prolonged transformer stress

- Voltage Drops and Energy Losses

b. Smart

- Optimal charging profile improved by the EV

Load Forecast

c. From DG

- When available, is the best option- Minimum

impact to the Grid

45

New EV Market model & framework

Investment business models? Utility Centric

(e.g. ESB,RWE)

Public and

private

charging

stations by

multiple

operators

Utility Car Manufacturer

Sell car

w/ battery

(or lease)

Pay

utility bill

Charge Station Centric

(e.g. Coulomb Tech)

Electricity

distributor

Charge stations

Billing

Pay to

charge

Utility Car Manufacturer

Demand

mgmt Power supply

& Billing (opt.)

Sell car

w/ battery

(or lease)

Pay

utility bill Charge

Demand

mgmt

Power supply

& Billing

Turnkey

(e.g. BetterPlace,Tesla)

Utility

Electricity Distributor

Own battery &

charge station

Car Manufacturer

Sell car

w/o battery

Subscribe

$/ mile Battery rental

Demand

mgmt Power supply

Geoff Ryder , SAP Labs, LLC, ISM 270, January 27, 2011

46

Why go Electric?

EV Supply Chain new entrants

1 Automotive industry 12 Energy Storage producers

2 Commercial and industrial manufacturers 13 Renewable power producers

3 Retailers 14 Regulators

4 Consumers, residential, commercial and industrial 15 Standard and specification development

organisations

5 Electric transportation industry 16 Relevant Government Agencies

6 Electric distribution industry 17 R&D organisations and academia

7 Electricity and financial market traders (including

aggregators)

18 Professional societies, user groups, and industry

consortia

8 Charging infrastructure developers 19 EV services integrators

9 ICT infrastructure and service providers 20 Local councils, local government

10 Information technology application developers and

integrators

21 Virtual Power Plants, Aggregators

11 State Regulators (Ofgem, UK) 22 Venture Capital, Investors

…..

47

Electric vehicle charge stations: grid connection points for power and

ancillary services delivery

Vehicles can respond very fast compared to power plants

Interaction with the grid – EVs becomes an active participant in grid operations

• Potential for energy storage

• Ancillary services

• Grid regulation

EVs synergistic with Smart Grid

• Digital Communications - Information flow between vehicle and utility—on some level—is critical to maximizing value

• Information Flow Control

• Power Flow Control

• Decision Algorithms

Conclusions

Smart Grids and EV Integration

48

Electricity as a transportation fuel

Complex management of large EV fleets

Integrated analysis of electricity / smart grids / transportation / market

Make charging infrastructure convenient for the EV user – strong support to EV purchase

Ensure that vehicle operators have sufficient energy for driving while enabling the delivery of that energy to vehicles in ways that minimize stress upon the grid

The charging solution should be able to manage the power flow of network connection point in order to reduce peak load and thus avoid overloading of electricity connection.

Pilot projects and experimental work – experiences of what works, what doesn’t and commonalities for standardization

Conclusions

Smart Grids and EV Integration

49

Conclusions

Smart Grids and EV Integration

Not a revolution but evolution – will evolve over many years

Created through the incremental deployment and integration of system intelligence and

increasing grid observability capabilities

Intelligent systems deployed to meet specific customer, utility business and technical

regulatory drivers and measurable benefits

Each utility has different:

• Drivers and benefits

• Starting points

• Paths

• Deployment speed

Thank you!

Dr. Liana Cipcigan

Contact Details

Cardiff University

School of Engineering

Queen's Buildings

The Parade, Cardiff CF24 3AA

[email protected]

Research Team:

Babis Marmaras (RA), Kroton Xydas (PhD student),

Dr. Panos Papadopoulos (graduated working at EDF,

Dr. Inaki Gradu-Unda graduated)

http://www.civitas.eu