56
Getting prepared: A 2010 report on recent high school graduates who took developmental/remedial courses Minnesota State Colleges & Universities University of Minnesota State-Level Summary and High School Summary

Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Getting prepared: A 2010 report

on recent high school

graduates who took

developmental/remedial

courses

Minnesota State Colleges & Universities

University of Minnesota

State-Level Summary andHigh School Summary

Page 2: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason
Page 3: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason
Page 4: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

ii

Getting Prepared: A 2010 Report on Recent High School Graduates Who Took Developmental/Remedial Courses State-Level Summary and High School Summary January 2011 Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Office of the Chancellor Wells Fargo Place 30 7th St. E., Suite 350 St. Paul, MN 55101-7804 Phone (651)201-1800 www.mnscu.edu University of Minnesota Institutional Research and Reporting 272 McNamara Alumni Center Minneapolis, MN 55455 Phone (612)624-4851 www.umn.edu Minnesota State Colleges and Universities and the University of Minnesota are Equal Opportunity employers and educators. Upon request, this publication is available in alternate formats by calling one of the following: General number: (651) 201-1800 Toll-free: 1-888-MNSCU-4-U (1-888-667-2848) TTY: (651) 282-2660

Page 5: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

iii

Executive Summary Postsecondary enrollment in developmental education is one measure of Minnesota’s performance in preparing K-12 students for college. To promote school improvement, the Minnesota Legislature requires the University of Minnesota and Minnesota State Colleges and Universities to report data on recent public high school graduates who take developmental (or remedial) courses in the two public systems. This report summary is sent to the Minnesota Department of Education and to the superintendents of all Minnesota school districts. Each superintendent also receives additional summary data on graduates from the district who took developmental courses to help schools examine their programs and their graduates’ preparation for college. Data in the report follow students from the high school classes of 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 for two years after high school graduation. One year of developmental course-taking data is available for graduates of the class of 2009. Developmental Courses Taken by 2008 Minnesota Public High School Graduates Within two years of high school graduation, 53 percent of the class of 2008 enrolled in a Minnesota public higher education institution. Of these public higher education students, 40 percent took one or more developmental courses during that period.

Minnesota Public High School Class of 2008 Graduates Who Enrolled in Minnesota Public Higher Education and Took Developmental Courses within Two Years of Graduation

Percent of graduates who attended public higher education and took at least one course 40%

Of graduates enrolled at the University of Minnesota (any campus) 2% Of graduates enrolled at a two-year community or technical college 54% Of graduates enrolled at a four-year state university 22%

Percent of graduates who attended public higher education who took:

One developmental course 18% Two developmental courses 10% Three or more developmental courses 12% At least one course in developmental mathematics 32% At least one course in developmental writing 17% At least one course in developmental reading 15%

Sources: University of Minnesota, Office of Institutional Research and Reporting and Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, Research and Planning

Most students who enrolled in developmental courses took only one course. However, 12 percent of the class attending public higher education took three or more courses.

Page 6: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

iv

Mathematics is the most common developmental course taken, followed by writing and then reading. Thirty-two percent of the 2008 graduates enrolled in developmental mathematics either alone or in combination with other skill areas. Nearly half of all students in developmental education (45 percent) enrolled only in mathematics courses. In contrast, almost all students who enrolled in developmental reading or writing were required to take developmental education in multiple skill areas. Developmental enrollments are concentrated in Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, particularly at the two-year colleges. Of the 12,997 graduates who enrolled in developmental courses, 99 percent attended an institution within Minnesota State Colleges and Universities; 87 percent attended a two-year community or technical college. With their mission to admit all high school graduates, two-year public colleges enrolled 54 percent of their students from the class of 2008 in developmental courses.

Recent Trends The percentage of recent graduates who enroll in developmental courses continues to increase. Comparable data on developmental course-taking among recent high school graduates is available beginning with the high school graduating class of 1999. For the class of 1999, 33 percent of the public higher education students took a developmental course within two years of graduation. For the classes of 2001 through 2003, that percentage rose to 36

127

1,725

11,309

-

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

University of Minnesota Four-Year State Universities Two-Year Colleges

Type of Institution Attended

Public Institutions Attended by 2008 High School Graduates Who Enrolled in Developmental Courses Within Two Years of Graduation

Page 7: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

v

percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason for the increase since 1999 is that larger percentages of new high school graduates were attending public colleges and universities. During the late 1990s, more adults of all ages, especially students who did not look ahead to college, began enrolling in postsecondary education. From 2001 to 2004, the percentage of new high school graduates enrolling in Minnesota public higher education institutions within two years was relatively steady at 49 or 50 percent. Since then, the two-year participation rate in public higher education grew to 54 percent of the class of 2008.

Percentages of recent high school graduates attending two-year colleges who enrolled in developmental courses increased to an all-time high with the class of 2008, but this growth was partially offset by declines in the percent of students attending four-year universities who took developmental courses. The percentage of new graduates at the University of Minnesota taking developmental courses dropped significantly since the class of 2000. More selective admissions on the Twin Cities campus is the main reason for this trend. It is likely that some students who previously might have been able to enroll and take developmental courses at the University of Minnesota instead enrolled in two-year colleges in the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system, adding to growth in developmental enrollments on those campuses.

Page 8: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

vi

At the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, more thorough placement testing and enforcement of required enrollment in developmental education account for at least some of the increase. Another possible reason for the increase is the poor economy and high unemployment rates which may have led high school graduates to attend college who in more prosperous times would have directly entered the workforce. Implications for High Schools and Postsecondary Education For high schools:

Mathematics continues to draw the majority of students in developmental education. Improving mathematics achievement among K-12 students can have the biggest payoff to help students avoid the need to take developmental courses.

High school faculty and staff can learn more about their graduates’ achievement levels by reviewing summary data which is distributed to district superintendents in a separate report. These tables report on the graduates of each high school, including which institutions they attended and the types of developmental courses they took.

Admission to the University of Minnesota and some universities in the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system are becoming more selective. Students who need developmental education may increasingly find they cannot start at a four-year public institution.

Teachers and students need to understand that, although community and technical colleges admit all high school graduates, students who are not prepared for college-level work will have to take developmental courses that do not count toward a certificate, diploma or a degree.

For colleges and universities:

Because most developmental enrollments are in Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, institutions in that system would benefit the most from expanded partnerships with high schools to improve preparation of all students for college.

Overview of Developmental Programs in Minnesota Public Higher Education All Minnesota public higher education institutions offer developmental courses that are taken by recent high school graduates. These courses count toward attendance levels required for financial aid and athletics eligibility, but the credits cannot be applied toward a higher education degree, diploma or certificate. Two-year colleges offer the most extensive developmental programs because they admit all high school graduates and enroll more students who need assistance than the four-year state universities and the University of Minnesota that have selective admissions policies. Minnesota’s provision of developmental education is typical in the United States.

Page 9: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

vii

Virtually all University of Minnesota developmental courses are in mathematics. Minnesota State Colleges and Universities offer developmental education in mathematics, writing, reading, English as a Second Language, study skills and miscellaneous topics. Institutions use a variety of methods to identify students who need developmental courses. The University of Minnesota, which advises but does not require students to enroll in developmental mathematics, generally uses the ACT assessment along with other measures. Minnesota State Colleges and Universities require most students to complete an incoming student assessment that includes basic measures of reading comprehension, writing and mathematics on system-endorsed tests. Students can be required to complete developmental courses before they enroll in liberal arts courses.

Page 10: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

viii

Page 11: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

ix

GETTING PREPARED: A 2010 Report on Recent High School Graduates Who Took Developmental/Remedial Courses

State-Level Summary and High School Summary

Contents Executive Summary iii Contents ix Getting Prepared for College 1 About this report 1 Development Education in Minnesota Public Higher Education 2 What is remedial or developmental education? 2 Why is developmental education necessary? 2 Which institutions provide developmental education? 3 How does an institution’s mission affect its developmental education programs? 3 How do institutions identify students who need developmental education? 4 State-Level Summary Information on Recent High School Graduates in 5 Public Higher Education How many recent high school graduates enroll in public higher education? 5 How many recent high school graduates take developmental courses? 5 What are the trends in the need for developmental education by recent high school graduates ? 6 How do Minnesota developmental education enrollments compare with 8 other states? What developmental courses are recent high school graduates taking? 8 Can students who need developmental education succeed in college? 9 Tables 12 Table 1: Enrollment and Extent of Developmental Courses/Credits 15 Table 2: Content of Developmental Courses 16 Table 3: Academic Performance in Postsecondary Education: Cumulative Grade Point Average Distribution 17 Table 4: ACT Composite Scores 20 Table 5: Summary Report by High School 21

Page 12: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

x

Page 13: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

1

Getting Prepared for College When Minnesota’s high school graduates plan their futures, they recognize that they will most likely require some form of postsecondary education to meet their personal and career goals.1 The University of Minnesota and Minnesota State Colleges and Universities are strengthening ties to high schools so that public higher education institutions can welcome students who are prepared for success in college. Although high schools are working hard to get every student ready for college, a significant and growing portion of high school graduates are placed into remedial or developmental courses when they enroll in higher education. Students who thought that high school would prepare them are often surprised when they need to take courses that will not count toward their degrees. Sometimes these students did not complete a college preparatory curriculum or perform well in high school. In other instances, there may be a mismatch between the high school’s understanding of college expectations and the placement practices in higher education. Getting Prepared is a report on recent graduates from Minnesota public high schools who took developmental courses in mathematics, writing, reading and other skill areas from public higher education institutions. The University of Minnesota and Minnesota State Colleges and Universities look forward to continued work on improving preparation for college with partners throughout the state. About this Report This report contains:

A state-level summary of recent public high school graduates who took remedial or

developmental courses at Minnesota State Colleges and Universities or the University of Minnesota within two years after graduation.

For each public high school, summary information on the numbers of graduates from

that school who enrolled in remedial or developmental courses. Minnesota State Colleges and Universities and the University of Minnesota are required by state law to submit this summary report to the Department of Education. The department is directed to evaluate the data and report its findings to the education committees of the Legislature. (Minnesota Statutes 13.32, subdivisions 3 and 6). Earlier reports were issued in 1997, 2001, 2002, 2005, and 2008.

1 An estimated 70 percent of 2008 Minnesota high school graduates enrolled in a Minnesota or out-of-state postsecondary institution in the fall term following graduation (Minnesota Office of Higher Education). Seventy-six percent of the 25 to 34 year old high school graduates residing in Minnesota have attended college at some point in their lives (U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2006-2008 three-year estimates).

Page 14: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

2

In separate reports, each school superintendent receives additional summary data about graduates from the district who took developmental courses. This supplemental information can be used by school staff to improve students’ preparation for college.2 Development Education in Minnesota Public Higher Education What is remedial or developmental education? Developmental or remedial education3 encompasses both formal coursework and academic support services for students who need help in meeting the academic requirements of the college-level curriculum. Following the legislative mandate for reporting on remedial instruction, the contents of this report focus on students who registered for remedial or developmental courses. Developmental courses and services provide basic academic skills necessary for successful college-level study and generally are in the areas of reading, writing, mathematics, study skills and English as a Second Language. The courses carry college credit for financial aid and athletic eligibility purposes, but may not be used to meet requirements for a diploma, certificate or degree. Developmental courses typically are taken early in a student’s college career. In addition to formal remedial or developmental courses, most institutions offer academic support programs such as learning centers, supplemental instruction, tutoring and advising. Often these programs assist all students who request help, including many students who are performing well in college. Why is developmental education necessary? Developmental instruction expands access to higher education for students who have the ability to succeed in college, but need extra help to improve their basic skills. All Minnesota public institutions admit some students who need developmental instruction. Some students take developmental courses because they have not taken the necessary coursework in high school. Other students, who have taken recommended high school courses, may still need development education, based on placement exam results. Some of these students have been out of high school for a number of years and lost skills they once had mastered.

2 In previous years, school districts received individual data on their graduates. Recent revisions and clarifications to the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), however, prohibit this type of distribution of individually identifiable data to former schools without the student’s permission. 3 In this report, both “remedial” education and “developmental” education are terms used to refer to programs offered by postsecondary institutions to prepare students for success in college-level work. “Remedial education,” the term used in Minnesota Statutes 13.32, can imply courses which repeat material taught earlier that the student did not learn adequately the first time. For many educators, “developmental education” is a broader term that encompasses pre-college-level education and other academic support services that the student may benefit from for any reason.

Page 15: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

3

Which institutions provide developmental education? All Minnesota public postsecondary institutions offered at least one developmental mathematics, reading or writing course to students in the high school classes 2005–2009. In 2000, the most current national information available, 92 percent of the public freshman-admitting institutions in the nation offered at least one developmental course. Developmental/Remedial Course Offerings Minnesota and U. S. Public Postsecondary Degree-Granting Institutions

Institution Type

Numberof

Institutions

Number of Minnesota and Percent of U. S. Public Institutions that Offered Developmental Courses to Recent High School Graduates in:

Math, writing

or reading Math Writing Reading ESL

Study Skills/Other

All Minnesota Public Institutions (2005—2009) 41 41 41 32 31 13 17

University of Minnesota 4 4 4 0 0 0 1

Two-Year Colleges 30 30 30 30 28 10 14

Four-Year State Universities 7 7 7 2 3 3 2 U. S. Public, Degree-Granting Institutions that Enroll Freshmen (2000) 1,660 92 % 90 % 86 % 80 % N/A N/A

Public Two-Year 1,080 98 % 97 % 96 % 96 % N/A N/A Public Four-Year 580 80 % 78 % 67 % 49 % N/A N/A

Sources: University of Minnesota and Minnesota State Colleges and Universities; U.S. Institutions that enrolled freshmen: National Center for Education Statistics, Remedial Education at Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions in Fall 2000, Statistical Analysis Report, NCES 2004-010 (November 2003).

How does an institution’s mission affect its developmental education programs? Two-year public colleges offer the most extensive array of developmental courses and academic support services. These institutions have the mission of providing open admission to students who might need improvement in reading, writing and mathematics in addition to other purposes. Developmental instruction in these areas is necessary to prepare students for vocational or technical programs or for transfer to baccalaureate institutions. Universities with the mission of offering baccalaureate and graduate degrees offer fewer developmental courses. These institutions are selective in their admissions, and as a group, entering students are better prepared for college-level work than entering students at institutions with “open admissions” policies. All Minnesota public universities offer

Page 16: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

4

developmental courses in mathematics; some state universities in the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system also offer developmental courses in writing, reading and English as a Second Language. How do institutions identify students who need developmental education? Minnesota public postsecondary institutions use tests, often combined with other measures, to determine student need for developmental education. Changes in placement practices—both placement test cut-off scores and registration policies—will affect the numbers of students who take developmental courses, even if the college readiness of high school graduates does not change.

University of Minnesota campuses use the ACT Assessment mathematics subscore, in combination with other placement tests or measures, to advise students on their initial mathematics course placement. Students are not required to take developmental courses.

All Minnesota State College and Universities assess students for course placement with the ACCUPLACER, a computerized instrument from The College Board. Prior to 2006, some institutions used a paper-and-pencil version of the College Board tests, known as the Descriptive Tests of Language Skills (DTLS) and Descriptive Tests of Mathematics Skills (DTMS). Areas that are assessed for course placement on all campuses include reading, writing and mathematics.

System policy and procedure call for all incoming students to take the ACCUPLACER unless they meet one of the exemption criteria. The policy and procedure allow system institutions to exempt students who have submitted ACT Assessment scores from taking the ACCUPLACER and to base placement decisions on the ACT subject area scores.

Since fall semester 2008, consistent systemwide minimum course placement scores have been used to determine which students need developmental education. Students who score below the minimums must be placed in appropriate developmental courses.

Implementation of system minimum course placement scores affected the number of students who take developmental courses as some colleges and universities adjusted their cutoff scores slightly upward or downward.

Page 17: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

5

State-Level Summary Information on Recent High School Graduates in Public Higher Education

Most information in this section summarizes experiences of the high school class of 2008, the latest high school class for which postsecondary course registration data are available for two years following their high school graduation. Detailed tables follow with two years of data on the classes of 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 and one year of data on the class of 2009. Nearly all students who enroll in developmental courses have been judged to need assistance to do well in college. While most students have been placed or counseled based on test scores and other information, some students elect to take these courses to improve their skills. Students who were advised, but not required, to register for a developmental course and did not take it are not reflected in this report.

How many recent high school graduates enroll in public higher education? By the time they had been out of high school for two years, 53 percent of the class of 2008 enrolled in a Minnesota public higher education institution, the highest participation rate since the Getting Prepared series began. Most of these students entered one of the institutions within Minnesota State Colleges and Universities. Two-year community and technical colleges enrolled 35 percent of the high school class of 2008, or nearly two-thirds of all students who enrolled in public higher education institutions. How many recent high school graduates take developmental courses? All together, 40 percent of the class of 2008 who enrolled in a Minnesota public higher education institution within two years took one or more developmental courses. Nearly half of all developmental course-takers, 18 percent of the entire class, took a single developmental course, most likely in mathematics. Twenty-one percent, however, took two or more courses. Six percent took four courses or more. Students who enroll in Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, especially the two-year colleges, are much more likely to take developmental courses than University of Minnesota students:

54 percent of the community and technical college students from the class of 2008 took a developmental course; 22 percent of the students state university students did so.

At the University of Minnesota, 2 percent of the class members were in developmental courses during the first two years following graduation.

Of the 12,997 graduates who enrolled in developmental courses, 99 percent attended an institution within Minnesota State Colleges and Universities; 87 percent attended a two-year community or technical college. As the University of Minnesota Twin Cities requires

Page 18: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

6

higher academic performance of its entering students, students who need developmental education are increasingly concentrated in the two-year colleges in Minnesota State Colleges and Universities.

2008 Minnesota Public High School Graduates Who Enrolled in Minnesota Public Higher Education Within Two Years and Who Took Developmental Courses

Minnesota Public Higher Education Institutions

% of 2008 Graduates Enrolled in

These Institutions

% of Graduates Enrolled in These Institutions Who Took:

% of Developmental Credits Taken By Subject Area:

One or More (Any)

Developmental Courses

Two or More Developmental

Courses Math Writing

Reading and

Other Subject

Areas All 53% 40% 21% 50% 23% 27% University of Minnesota 9% 2% <1% 99% 0% 1% Minnesota State Colleges and Universities* 45% 48% 26% 50% 23% 27%

Two-Year Colleges 35% 54% 32% 47% 24% 29%State Universities 13% 22% 4% 90% 3% 7%

* Students who attended both a two-year college and a four-year state university are counted only once in total percentage who enrolled in the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system. Sources: University of Minnesota, Office of Institutional Research and Reporting and Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, Research and Planning

What are the trends in the need for developmental education by recent high school graduates? Minnesota investments in K-12 standards and school reform should pay off with diminished need for developmental instruction when students get to college. Recent data on developmental course-taking, however, cannot confirm what effects school changes are having on college readiness. Future school reforms, such as strengthened math requirements for high school graduation, have not yet taken effect. Data using current methodology are available starting with the high school class of 1999.4 In the two years following their graduation, 33 percent of the class of 1999 students who entered Minnesota public higher education institutions enrolled in at least one developmental course. Comparable rates for the classes of 2000-2002 show increases, with a drop in the percentage at the University of Minnesota offset by increases in the rates institutions in the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system. Since the class of 2004, 4 Remedial education enrollments for two years following the graduation of the class of 1999 were reported in the 2002 Getting Prepared report. Getting Prepared reports issued in 1997 and 2001on earlier classes used non-comparable methodologies.

Page 19: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

7

rates of enrollment in developmental courses at the University of Minnesota and the state universities have fallen. Percentages of two-year college students enrolling in developmental courses, however, have continued to grow, reaching their highest point to date with the classes of 2007 and 2008.

Percent of 1999-2008 Minnesota Public High School Graduates Who Took at Least One Developmental Course at a Minnesota Public Institution Within Two Years of High School Graduation

High School Class

Minnesota Public Higher Education Institutions 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005* 2006 2007 2008

2009(One year only)

All 33% 34% 36% 36% 36% 37% 39% 39% 40% 40% 38% University of Minnesota 15% 15% 11% 8% 8% 8% 7% 4% 3% 2% 2% Minnesota State Colleges and Universities 37% 39% 41% 42% 42% 44% 46% 47% 48% 48% 47%

Two-Year Colleges 43% 44% 45% 46% 45% 47% 49% 51% 53% 54% 57%State Universities 21% 23% 27% 29% 29% 29% 27% 26% 26% 22% 19%

* Class of 2005 data has been corrected from data previously reported in Getting Prepared, March 2008. Sources: University of Minnesota, Office of Institutional Research and Reporting and Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, Research and Planning

Increases in the percentages of students enrolling in developmental courses, however, do not necessarily mean that the college readiness of new high school graduates has worsened. One reason for the change in developmental course-taking since 1999 could be that more students are choosing to go to college. Two-year enrollment rates in public higher education increased from 45 percent for the class of 2000 to 53 percent for the class of 2008. Increases in postsecondary participation rates often reflect growth in the participation of graduates who did not anticipate and prepare for college throughout high school. Changes in developmental education at Minnesota State Colleges and Universities probably account for at least some of the growth in remedial education course-taking. Since 1999, system policies and institutional practices have focused on requiring more consistent identification and required placement of entering students to help them succeed in college. These improvements are ongoing and continue to affect the numbers of high school graduates who are placed in developmental education.

Page 20: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

8

How do Minnesota developmental education enrollments compare with other states? Because of reporting differences, it is difficult to compare Minnesota statistics in this report directly with data from other states. All studies, however, show that large numbers of students enroll in developmental courses, particularly in two-year public colleges.

In one national survey, public institutions reported that 32 percent of their first-time, full-time students took at least one developmental course in reading, writing or mathematics in fall 2000. Students attending two-year colleges were more than twice as likely to enroll in developmental courses as students attending four-year institutions. Forty-two percent of the students in public two-year colleges enrolled in developmental courses compared to 20 percent in public four-year universities.5

A different national study looked at student transcripts. Based this review, an

estimated 41 percent of the 1992 12th graders who enrolled in postsecondary education took a developmental course at some time during college. This study estimated that 61 percent of the students who first attend a public two-year college take developmental courses, compared to 25 percent of the students who first attend a public or private four-year institution.6

More recently, a national sample of undergraduates self-reported enrollment in

remedial courses. Forty-three percent of the first- and second-year students attending public two-year institutions reported ever taking at least one remedial course. Thirty-five percent of the first- and second-year students attending public four-year non-doctorate-granting universities had ever taken a remedial course. In doctorate-granting public universities, 25 percent of the first- and second-year students self-reported ever taking one or more remedial courses .7

What developmental courses are recent high school graduates taking? Of all developmental credits taken by the class of 2008, 50 percent were in mathematics. Writing courses account for 23 percent of the credits, all provided through Minnesota State Colleges and Universities. The remaining credits were in other subject areas, namely reading at Minnesota State Colleges and Universities. Virtually all credits taken at University of Minnesota campuses were in developmental mathematics.

5 Remedial Education at Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions in Fall 2000, National Center for Education Statistics, U. S. Department of Education, NCES 2004-010 (November 2003). 6 The Condition of Education 2004, National Center for Education Statistics, U. S. Department of Education, NCES 2004-077 (June 2004). Intermediate algebra, which enrolls large numbers of students and is considered a remedial course in Minnesota public institutions, was not counted as remedial if the student attended a college that granted degree credit for it. 7 Profile of Undergraduates in U. S. Postsecondary Education Institutions: 2003-04 with a Special Analysis of Community College Students, U. S. Department of Education, NCES 2006-184 (June 2006).

Page 21: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

9

Mathematics credits account for the majority of developmental credits taken in both two- year colleges and four-year universities within Minnesota State Colleges and Universities. However, developmental writing credits made up 3 percent of the state university developmental credits and 24 percent of two-year college credits. Developmental reading enrollments are concentrated in the two-year colleges, where they accounted for 23 percent of the credits. Remaining developmental credits in Minnesota State Colleges and Universities were in English as a Second Languages, study skills and miscellaneous courses. Thirty-two percent of the class of 2008 who enrolled in Minnesota public higher education took a developmental course in mathematics. Eighteen percent of the class enrolled in developmental mathematics but did not need developmental education in other skill areas; they represented nearly half of all students in developmental education.

Content of Developmental Courses Taken in Minnesota Public Higher Education Institutions by 2008 Minnesota Public High School Graduates Within Two Years of Graduation

Developmental Courses Taken within Two Years

2008 Graduates Who Enrolled in Public Higher Education Institutions

Students Percent

No developmental courses 19,359 60% Any developmental courses 12,997 40% Any mathematics 10,498 32% Any writing 5,345 17% Any reading 4,916 15%

Mathematics only 5,912 18% Writing only 635 2% Reading only 574 2%

Sources: University of Minnesota, Office of Institutional Research and Reporting and Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, Research and Planning

Developmental mathematics courses range in level from basic arithmetic to the equivalent of high school intermediate algebra. Significant numbers of recent high school graduates are being placed in developmental courses at all levels when they begin postsecondary education. Can students who need developmental education succeed in college? As one would expect, the average ACT Assessment scores of students who take developmental courses are lower than the scores of the entering class as a whole. Low ACT Assessment scores are one reason students can be placed in developmental courses at the University of Minnesota and the four-year state universities.

Page 22: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

10

Once they enroll, students who take developmental courses earn somewhat lower grades than students who do not. A college grade point average below 2.0 would indicate potential trouble in meeting academic standards for a degree. Seventeen percent of the class of 2008 students who enrolled in developmental courses were performing at that low level two years after high school, compared to 9 percent of students from that class who did not take developmental courses.8

Assessment Test Scores and Academic Performance of 2008 Minnesota Public High School Graduates Enrolled in Minnesota Public Higher Education Within Two Years

Minnesota Public Higher Education Institutions

Mean ACT Composite Scores

Percent of Students with

College GPA < 2.08

Class of 2008 Total

Students Who Took

Developmental Courses

Students Who Did Not Take

Developmental Courses

Students Who Took

Developmental Courses

All Insufficient data Insufficient data 9% 17%

University of Minnesota 24.9 19.3 6% 20%

Minnesota State Colleges and Universities (any) Insufficient data Insufficient data 10% 17%

Two-Year Colleges Insufficient data Insufficient data 10% 17%

State Universities 21.7 19.2 11% 14%

Note: ACT assessment scores are not available for most students who attend two-year colleges because scores are not required for admission. GPA data are for students who accumulated at least 16 credits within two years of high school graduation. Sources: University of Minnesota, Office of Institutional Research and Reporting and Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, Research and Planning

8 Includes students who earned at least 16 credits in higher education courses within two years of high school graduation.

Developmental Courses in Mathematics Taken in Minnesota State Colleges and Universities by 2008 Minnesota Public High School Graduates Within Two Years of Graduation

Level of Developmental Mathematics

Percent of Courses Taken in Developmental Mathematics

Arithmetic/Basic Mathematics

26%

Elementary Algebra 35%

Intermediate Algebra 32%

Other Developmental Mathematics Courses 7%

Sources: Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, Research and Planning

Page 23: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

11

Enrollment in developmental courses does not mean that a student cannot be successful in college. Of all students in the class of 2008 who took developmental courses, 83 percent earned a grade point average of 2.0 or better, and 32 percent earned a grade point average of 3.0 or better in the two years following high school graduation. Their success proves that the need for developmental education does not necessarily mean that college is a poor investment for them and for the state. However, because developmental credits do not count towards a degree, all students are better off getting the foundation they need in high school to start college-level courses right away.

Page 24: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

12

Tables Tables 1 – 5 report state-level summary information on 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 graduates from Minnesota public high schools who enrolled at Minnesota public colleges or universities.

• For the classes of 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008, the information in Tables 1 – 5

includes the experience of students through two years following high school graduation. Data on the classes of 2005 and 2006 differ from earlier reporting.9

• For the class of 2009, preliminary information is reported for only one year following high school graduation.

Table 1: Enrollment and Extent of Developmental Courses or Credits

Table 1 reports the numbers of 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 Minnesota public high school graduates, the numbers who enrolled in public higher education, and the numbers of students who took one, two, three and four or more developmental courses.

Table 2: Content of Developmental Courses

Table 2 reports the numbers of developmental credits taken by 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 Minnesota public high school graduates in mathematics, reading, writing, English as a Second Language and study skills courses.

Table 3: Academic Performance in Postsecondary Education: Cumulative Grade Point Average Distribution (Students with 16 or More Earned Credits)

Table 3 reports the distributions of cumulative postsecondary grade point averages for all 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 Minnesota public high school graduates who enrolled in public higher education and for students who enrolled in developmental courses. Only students who earned at least 16 semester credits in postsecondary education are included.

Table 4: ACT Composite Scores

Table 4 reports the mean ACT Assessment composite score for all 2005, 2006, 2007 2008, and 2009 Minnesota public high school graduates who enrolled in public four-

9 Data on the class of 2005 are corrected from previous Getting Prepared report (March, 2008). Preliminary information on the class of 2006 in that report included only one year of data and therefore differs from the two years of data included in this report. 4,755 students or 8 percent of the class of 2006, entered public higher education in the second year following graduation.

Page 25: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

13

year universities and for students who enrolled in developmental courses at these institutions. Two-year public colleges do not require the ACT for admission, and scores are not available for a representative sample of students.

Table 5: Summary Report by High School

In Table 5, consolidated information on the high school classes of 2005 – 2009 is reported for each Minnesota public high school. The high school summary reports the combined number of graduates from these classes who took developmental or remedial courses at either of the public systems within two years after high school graduation (one year for the class of 2009). To comply with state and federal data privacy laws, high schools with five or fewer graduates taking developmental courses are reported as a group. High schools that did not have any 2005 – 2009 graduates who enrolled in developmental courses at public colleges or universities are omitted from the table. Caution should be exercised in interpreting the information in the high school summary. Graduates who enrolled in Minnesota public colleges and universities may not be representative of all graduates from that high school. The college readiness of graduates who enrolled in private colleges or universities or in public colleges or universities in other states is not reflected in this report. It is important to consider the absolute number of graduates from a high school as well as the percentage of graduates enrolled in public colleges or universities (Column E), the percentage of graduates who took developmental courses (Column G) and the percentage of total graduates who took developmental courses. The high school summary in Table 5 reports the following information:

• School District – The school district that operates the high school. (Column A)

• High School – The name of the high school. (Column B) • Total Number of Graduates – The combined total number of graduates

from the high school in the classes of 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009. (Column C)

• Graduates Enrolled in Minnesota Public Higher Education – The combined number of graduates from the classes of 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 from this high school who enrolled in a Minnesota public college or university during their first two years following graduation (one year for class of 2009). (Column D)

• Graduates Enrolled in Minnesota Public Higher Education as a Percent of Total Graduates – 2005 - 2009 graduates from this high school that enrolled at a Minnesota public college or university as a percent of all graduates from the high school in those classes. (Column E)

• Graduates Who Took Developmental Courses at Minnesota Public Higher Education Institutions – The combined number of 2005 – 2009

Page 26: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

14

graduates from this high school who took one or more developmental courses in a Minnesota public higher education institution during the first two years after their graduation (one year for class of 2009). (Column F)

• Graduates Who Took Developmental Courses as a Percent of Graduates in Minnesota Public Higher Education – The number of 2005 – 2009 graduates from this high school who took one or more developmental courses as a percent of all graduates from this high school who enrolled in a Minnesota public college or university. (Column G)

• Graduates Who Took Developmental Courses as a Percent of Total Graduates – The number of 2005 – 2009 graduates from this high school who took one or more developmental courses as a percent of all graduates from this high school, regardless of their attendance in postsecondary education. (Column H)

Page 27: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Yea

r of

H

igh

Sch

ool

Gra

duat

ion

Tot

al

Gra

duat

es

in C

lass

Num

ber

Stu

dent

sS

tude

nts

Cre

dits

% o

f H

igh

Sch

ool

Cla

ss

% o

f H

igh

Sch

ool

Cla

ss

% o

f G

rads

in P

ublic

H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Dev

C

redi

ts

Tot

al G

radu

ates

Enr

olle

d In

Min

neso

ta P

ublic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

nG

radu

ates

Enr

olle

d in

D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

Min

neso

ta P

ublic

Hig

h S

cho

ol G

radu

ate

sN

umbe

r of

De

velo

pmen

tal C

ours

es/D

eve

lopm

enta

l Cre

dits

Tak

en

1 C

ours

eA

ll

Ta

ble

1E

nro

llm

ent

and

Ext

ent

of

Dev

elo

pm

enta

l Co

urs

es/C

red

its

Enr

olle

d in

Min

neso

ta P

ubl

ic H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Inst

itutio

ns

Stu

dent

sC

redi

ts

2 C

ours

es

Stu

dent

sC

redi

ts

3 C

ours

es

Stu

dent

sC

redi

ts

4+ C

ours

es

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ate

s

En

rolle

d a

t A

ny

Pu

blic

Hig

her

Ed

uca

tio

n In

stit

uti

on

(M

inn

eso

ta S

tate

Co

lleg

es a

nd

Un

iver

sit

ies

or

Un

iver

sit

y o

f M

inn

eso

ta)

2005

58,4

88

29,7

06

11,5

426,

167

1,34

01,

154

20,9

57

19,4

34

13,7

39

19,1

41

2,88

15

1%20

%39

%73

,271

2006

59,0

94

30,8

97

12,1

426,

124

1,52

31,

374

20,8

42

21,3

56

15,7

65

23,3

72

3,12

15

2%21

%39

%81

,335

2007

59,7

78

31,8

12

12,8

316,

280

1,68

91,

638

21,5

21

22,1

18

17,4

35

27,8

62

3,22

45

3%21

%40

%88

,936

2008

60,7

32

32,3

56

12,9

975,

909

1,88

22,

027

20,4

84

22,0

42

19,4

63

35,1

26

3,17

95

3%21

%40

%97

,115

2009

59,5

01

27,3

91

10,3

084,

845

1,56

21,

315

16,8

54

17,9

96

16,1

51

21,0

48

2,58

64

6%17

%38

%72

,049

En

rolle

d a

t th

e U

niv

ersi

ty o

f M

inn

eso

ta (

any

cam

pu

s)

2005

58,4

88

5,18

537

03

062

01,

207

494

240

629%

1%7%

1,72

5

2006

59,0

94

5,49

323

72

091

082

121

412

027

9%0%

4%1,

047

2007

59,7

78

5,42

614

01

281

050

286

120

119%

0%3%

600

2008

60,7

32

5,32

412

71

250

045

216

00

29%

0%2%

468

2009

59,5

01

5,46

610

41

030

037

48

00

19%

0%2%

382

En

rolle

d a

t M

inn

eso

ta S

tate

Co

lleg

es a

nd

Un

iver

siti

es (

any

cam

pu

s)**

2005

58,4

88

24,5

21

11,1

725,

861

1,33

81,

154

19,7

50

18,9

40

13,7

15

19,1

41

2,81

94

2%19

%46

%71

,546

2006

59,0

94

25,4

04

11,9

055,

915

1,52

21,

374

20,0

21

21,1

42

15,7

53

23,3

72

3,09

44

3%20

%47

%80

,288

2007

59,7

78

26,3

86

12,6

916,

152

1,68

81,

638

21,0

19

22,0

32

17,4

23

27,8

62

3,21

34

4%21

%48

%88

,336

2008

60,7

32

27,0

32

12,8

705,

784

1,88

22,

027

20,0

32

22,0

26

19,4

63

35,1

26

3,17

74

5%21

%48

%96

,647

2009

59,5

01

21,9

25

10,2

044,

742

1,56

21,

315

16,4

80

17,9

88

16,1

51

21,0

48

2,58

53

7%17

%47

%71

,667

En

rolle

d a

t M

inn

eso

ta S

tate

Tw

o-Y

ear

Co

lleg

es

2005

58,4

88

18,9

61

9,34

64,

453

1,29

01,

140

15,4

53

17,2

38

13,3

93

18,9

44

2,46

33

2%16

%49

%65

,028

2006

59,0

94

19,7

45

10,1

474,

538

1,47

61,

353

15,9

06

19,6

96

15,4

34

23,0

99

2,78

03

3%17

%51

%74

,135

2007

59,7

78

20,3

05

10,8

354,

688

1,65

31,

610

16,5

29

20,5

06

17,2

00

27,4

51

2,88

43

4%18

%53

%81

,686

2008

60,7

32

21,0

93

11,3

094,

613

1,83

12,

014

16,4

08

20,4

95

19,0

57

34,8

89

2,85

13

5%19

%54

%90

,849

2009

59,5

01

15,7

87

9,01

03,

786

1,55

11,

310

13,4

86

17,0

70

16,0

78

20,9

85

2,36

32

7%15

%57

%67

,619

En

rolle

d a

t M

inn

eso

ta S

tate

Un

iver

siti

es

2005

58,4

88

7,16

81,

929

1,57

832

14,

901

1,39

821

36

318

12%

3%27

%6,

518

2006

59,0

94

7,26

61,

872

1,55

426

14,

729

1,28

213

66

291

12%

3%26

%6,

153

2007

59,7

78

7,65

81,

995

1,68

720

15,

268

1,26

311

36

287

13%

3%26

%6,

650

2008

60,7

32

7,73

61,

725

1,45

224

14,

556

1,09

813

86

248

13%

3%22

%5,

798

2009

59,5

01

6,53

61,

243

1,04

27

03,

278

739

310

194

11%

2%19

%4,

048

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f M

inne

sota

Off

ice

of I

nstit

utio

nal R

esea

rch

and

Re

port

ing

**S

tud

en

ts w

ho

to

ok

cou

rse

s a

t m

ore

than

one

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

or

Uni

vers

ity a

re c

ount

ed o

nly

once

. T

here

fore

, th

is c

ount

is s

ligh

tly lo

wer

tha

n th

e su

m o

f S

tate

Tw

o-Y

ear

Col

lege

s pl

us M

inne

sota

Sta

te U

nive

rsiti

es.

* E

nrol

lmen

t w

ithin

tw

o ye

ars

of g

radu

atio

n fo

r 20

05-2

008

grad

uate

s an

d w

ithin

one

yea

r of

gra

duat

ion

for

2009

gra

duat

es.

15

Page 28: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Mat

hR

ead

ing

ES

LS

tud

y S

kills

/Oth

erY

ear

of

Hig

h

Sch

oo

l G

rad

uat

ion

To

tal

Nu

mb

er

Per

cen

t

Cre

dit

s

Wri

tin

g

Ta

ble

2D

evel

op

men

tal C

red

its

Tak

en b

y C

on

ten

t A

rea

Nu

mb

er

Per

cen

tN

um

ber

P

erce

nt

Nu

mb

er

Per

cen

tN

um

ber

P

erce

nt

Nu

mb

er

Per

cen

t

En

rolle

d in

Min

neso

ta P

ublic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n In

stitu

tions

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ate

s

En

rolle

d a

t A

ny

Pu

blic

Hig

her

Ed

uca

tio

n In

stit

uti

on

(M

inn

eso

ta S

tate

Co

lleg

es a

nd

Un

iver

siti

es o

r U

niv

ersi

ty o

f M

inn

eso

ta)

2005

42,5

2412

,470

2,99

957

173

,271

58%

17%

4%1%

100%

14,7

0720

%

2006

44,9

8314

,384

5,06

845

281

,335

55%

18%

6%1%

100%

16,4

4820

%

2007

47,4

9117

,481

3,87

348

988

,936

53%

20%

4%1%

100%

19,6

0222

%

2008

48,5

0720

,944

5,14

848

497

,115

50%

22%

5%0%

100%

22,0

3223

%

2009

32,8

4117

,435

3,87

127

372

,049

46%

24%

5%0%

100%

17,6

2924

%

En

rolle

d a

t th

e U

niv

ersi

ty o

f M

inn

eso

ta (

any

cam

pu

s)

2005

1,71

60

09

1,72

599

%0%

0%1%

100%

00%

2006

1,03

80

09

1,04

799

%0%

0%1%

100%

00%

2007

588

00

1260

098

%0%

0%2%

100%

00%

2008

462

00

646

899

%0%

0%1%

100%

00%

2009

382

00

038

210

0%0%

0%0%

100%

00%

En

rolle

d a

t M

inn

eso

ta S

tate

Co

lleg

es a

nd

Un

iver

siti

es

2005

40,8

0812

,470

2,99

956

271

,546

57%

17%

4%1%

100%

14,7

0721

%

2006

43,9

4514

,384

5,06

844

380

,288

55%

18%

6%1%

100%

16,4

4820

%

2007

46,9

0317

,481

3,87

347

788

,336

53%

20%

4%1%

100%

19,6

0222

%

2008

48,0

4520

,944

5,14

847

896

,647

50%

22%

5%0%

100%

22,0

3223

%

2009

32,4

5917

,435

3,87

127

371

,667

45%

24%

5%0%

100%

17,6

2925

%

En

rolle

d a

t M

inn

eso

ta S

tate

Tw

o-Y

ear

Co

lleg

es

2005

35,0

9612

,086

2,99

443

765

,028

54%

19%

5%1%

100%

14,4

1522

%

2006

38,4

5514

,068

5,06

630

874

,135

52%

19%

7%0%

100%

16,2

3822

%

2007

40,9

4917

,157

3,86

133

181

,686

50%

21%

5%0%

100%

19,3

8824

%

2008

42,8

3820

,690

5,12

034

690

,849

47%

23%

6%0%

100%

21,8

5524

%

2009

28,8

3417

,207

3,84

226

967

,619

43%

25%

6%0%

100%

17,4

6726

%

En

rolle

d a

t M

inn

eso

ta S

tate

Un

iver

siti

es

2005

5,71

238

45

125

6,51

888

%6%

0%2%

100%

292

4%

2006

5,49

031

62

135

6,15

389

%5%

0%2%

100%

210

3%

2007

5,95

432

412

146

6,65

090

%5%

0%2%

100%

214

3%

2008

5,20

725

428

132

5,79

890

%4%

0%2%

100%

177

3%

2009

3,62

522

829

44,

048

90%

6%1%

0%10

0%16

24%

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta O

ffic

e of

Ins

titut

iona

l Res

earc

h an

d R

epo

rtin

g*

Enr

ollm

ent

with

in t

wo

year

s of

gra

duat

ion

for

2005

-200

8 gr

adua

tes

and

with

in o

ne y

ear

of g

radu

atio

n fo

r 20

09 g

radu

ates

.

16

Page 29: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Ta

ble

3A

cad

emic

Per

form

ance

in

Hi g

her

Ed

uca

tio

n:

Cu

mu

lati

ve G

rad

e P

oin

t A

vera

ge

Dis

trib

uti

on

(Stu

dent

s W

ith 1

6 o

r M

ore

Ear

ned

Cre

dits

)E

nro

lled

in M

inne

sota

Pub

lic H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Inst

itutio

ns

3.0

0 to

4.0

0B

elo

w 2

.00

Yea

r o

f H

igh

S

cho

ol

Gra

du

atio

nT

ota

l

Nu

mb

er

Per

cen

t

Gra

de

Po

int

Ave

rag

e

2.0

0 to

2.9

9

Nu

mb

er

Per

cen

tN

um

ber

P

erce

nt

Nu

mb

er

Per

cen

t

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ate

s

En

rolle

d a

t A

ny

Pu

blic

Hig

he

r E

du

cati

on

Inst

itu

tio

n (

Min

nes

ota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

an

d U

niv

ersi

ties

or

Un

iver

sity

of

Min

nes

ota

)

2005

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

9,45

89,

386

2,52

021

,364

100%

44%

44%

12%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

2,39

74,

078

1,29

57,

770

100%

31%

52%

17%

2006

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

9,90

39,

603

2,55

822

,064

100%

45%

44%

12%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

2,62

44,

119

1,27

68,

019

100%

33%

51%

16%

2007

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

10,1

169,

778

2,74

222

,636

100%

45%

43%

12%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

2,60

24,

298

1,50

78,

407

100%

31%

51%

18%

2008

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

10,4

2810

,035

2,69

723

,160

100%

45%

43%

12%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

2,75

84,

500

1,45

88,

716

100%

32%

52%

17%

2009

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

8,88

58,

046

2,08

419

,015

100%

47%

42%

11%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

2,06

82,

944

877

5,88

910

0%35

%50

%15

%

En

rolle

d a

t th

e U

niv

ersi

ty o

f M

inn

eso

ta (

any

cam

pu

s)

2005

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

2,47

41,

941

394

4,80

910

0%51

%40

%8%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

66

181

59

306

100%

22%

59%

19%

2006

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

2,70

92,

018

367

5,09

410

0%53

%40

%7%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

44

125

26

195

100%

23%

64%

13%

2007

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

2,89

31,

911

310

5,11

410

0%57

%37

%6%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

23

75

21

119

100%

19%

63%

18%

2008

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

2,86

61,

891

304

5,06

110

0%57

%37

%6%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

23

68

23

114

100%

20%

60%

20%

2009

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

3,04

11,

774

296

5,11

110

0%59

%35

%6%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

26

42

16

84

100%

31%

50%

19%

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta O

ffic

e of

Ins

titut

iona

l Res

earc

h an

d R

epo

rtin

g*

Enr

ollm

ent

with

in t

wo

year

s of

gra

duat

ion

for

2005

-200

8 gr

adua

tes

and

with

in o

ne y

ear

of g

radu

atio

n fo

r 20

09 g

radu

ates

.

17

Page 30: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Ta

ble

3A

cad

emic

Per

form

ance

in

Hi g

her

Ed

uca

tio

n:

Cu

mu

lati

ve G

rad

e P

oin

t A

vera

ge

Dis

trib

uti

on

(Stu

dent

s W

ith 1

6 o

r M

ore

Ear

ned

Cre

dits

)E

nro

lled

in M

inne

sota

Pub

lic H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Inst

itutio

ns

3.0

0 to

4.0

0B

elo

w 2

.00

Yea

r o

f H

igh

S

cho

ol

Gra

du

atio

nT

ota

l

Nu

mb

er

Per

cen

t

Gra

de

Po

int

Ave

rag

e

2.0

0 to

2.9

9

Nu

mb

er

Per

cen

tN

um

ber

P

erce

nt

Nu

mb

er

Per

cen

t

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ate

s

En

rolle

d a

t M

inn

eso

ta S

tate

Co

lleg

es a

nd

Un

iver

siti

es

2005

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

6,98

47,

445

2,12

616

,555

100%

42%

45%

13%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

2,33

13,

897

1,23

67,

464

100%

31%

52%

17%

2006

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

7,19

47,

585

2,19

116

,970

100%

42%

45%

13%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

2,58

03,

994

1,25

07,

824

100%

33%

51%

16%

2007

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

7,22

37,

867

2,43

217

,522

100%

41%

45%

14%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

2,57

94,

223

1,48

68,

288

100%

31%

51%

18%

2008

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

7,56

28,

144

2,39

318

,099

100%

42%

45%

13%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

2,73

54,

432

1,43

58,

602

100%

32%

52%

17%

2009

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

5,84

46,

272

1,78

813

,904

100%

42%

45%

13%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

2,04

22,

902

861

5,80

510

0%35

%50

%15

%

En

rolle

d a

t M

inn

eso

ta S

tate

Tw

o-Y

ear

Co

lleg

es

2005

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

4,47

25,

280

1,58

911

,341

100%

39%

47%

14%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

1,69

63,

042

1,01

75,

755

100%

29%

53%

18%

2006

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

4,66

15,

321

1,68

511

,667

100%

40%

46%

14%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

1,94

33,

141

1,06

36,

147

100%

32%

51%

17%

2007

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

4,51

05,

462

1,80

511

,777

100%

38%

46%

15%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

1,91

43,

325

1,22

16,

460

100%

30%

51%

19%

2008

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

4,84

95,

668

1,76

212

,279

100%

39%

46%

14%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

2,20

13,

584

1,21

06,

995

100%

31%

51%

17%

2009

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

3,58

23,

961

1,12

98,

672

100%

41%

46%

13%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

1,69

22,

338

703

4,73

310

0%36

%49

%15

%

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta O

ffic

e of

Ins

titut

iona

l Res

earc

h an

d R

epo

rtin

g*

Enr

ollm

ent

with

in t

wo

year

s of

gra

duat

ion

for

2005

-200

8 gr

adua

tes

and

with

in o

ne y

ear

of g

radu

atio

n fo

r 20

09 g

radu

ates

.

18

Page 31: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Ta

ble

3A

cad

emic

Per

form

ance

in

Hi g

her

Ed

uca

tio

n:

Cu

mu

lati

ve G

rad

e P

oin

t A

vera

ge

Dis

trib

uti

on

(Stu

dent

s W

ith 1

6 o

r M

ore

Ear

ned

Cre

dits

)E

nro

lled

in M

inne

sota

Pub

lic H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Inst

itutio

ns

3.0

0 to

4.0

0B

elo

w 2

.00

Yea

r o

f H

igh

S

cho

ol

Gra

du

atio

nT

ota

l

Nu

mb

er

Per

cen

t

Gra

de

Po

int

Ave

rag

e

2.0

0 to

2.9

9

Nu

mb

er

Per

cen

tN

um

ber

P

erce

nt

Nu

mb

er

Per

cen

t

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ate

s

En

rolle

d a

t M

inn

eso

ta S

tate

Un

iver

siti

es

2005

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

2,66

52,

448

643

5,75

610

0%46

%43

%11

%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

585

857

229

1,67

110

0%35

%51

%14

%

2006

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

2,67

72,

564

618

5,85

910

0%46

%44

%11

%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

582

851

188

1,62

110

0%36

%52

%12

%

2007

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

2,85

82,

649

740

6,24

710

0%46

%42

%12

%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

614

888

256

1,75

810

0%35

%51

%15

%

2008

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

2,87

02,

769

728

6,36

710

0%45

%43

%11

%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

474

834

217

1,52

510

0%31

%55

%14

%

2009

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

16+

Cre

dits

2,27

12,

316

661

5,24

810

0%43

%44

%13

%

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in D

evel

opm

enta

l Cou

rses

344

554

154

1,05

210

0%33

%53

%15

%

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta O

ffic

e of

Ins

titut

iona

l Res

earc

h an

d R

epo

rtin

g*

Enr

ollm

ent

with

in t

wo

year

s of

gra

duat

ion

for

2005

-200

8 gr

adua

tes

and

with

in o

ne y

ear

of g

radu

atio

n fo

r 20

09 g

radu

ates

.

19

Page 32: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Ta

ble

4A

CT

Co

mp

osi

te S

co

res

# V

alid

Sco

res

Yea

r o

f H

igh

S

cho

ol

Gra

du

atio

n

Mea

nS

core

s

Enr

olle

d in

Min

neso

ta P

ubl

ic H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Inst

itutio

ns20

05 -

200

9* M

inn

esot

a P

ublic

Hig

h S

choo

l Gra

duat

es

En

rolle

d a

t th

e U

niv

ersi

ty o

f M

inn

eso

ta (

any

cam

pu

s)

2005

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

as S

tude

nts

5,08

324

.1

Gra

duat

es in

Dev

elop

men

tal C

ours

es35

718

.9

2006

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

as S

tude

nts

5,40

924

.0

Gra

duat

es in

Dev

elop

men

tal C

ours

es23

419

.4

2007

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

as S

tude

nts

5,34

124

.7

Gra

duat

es in

Dev

elop

men

tal C

ours

es14

019

.3

2008

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

as S

tude

nts

5,25

624

.9

Gra

duat

es in

Dev

elop

men

tal C

ours

es12

619

.3

2009

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

as S

tude

nts

5,37

325

.2

Gra

duat

es in

Dev

elop

men

tal C

ours

es10

119

.7

En

rolle

d a

t M

inn

eso

ta S

tate

Un

iver

siti

es

2005

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

as S

tude

nts

6,48

121

.5

Gra

duat

es in

Dev

elop

men

tal C

ours

es1,

839

19.8

2006

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

as S

tude

nts

6,75

621

.5

Gra

duat

es in

Dev

elop

men

tal C

ours

es1,

802

19.8

2007

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

as S

tude

nts

7,21

321

.6

Gra

duat

es in

Dev

elop

men

tal C

ours

es1,

934

19.7

2008

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

as S

tude

nts

7,31

721

.7

Gra

duat

es in

Dev

elop

men

tal C

ours

es1,

659

19.2

2009

All

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

as S

tude

nts

6,39

121

.7

Gra

duat

es in

Dev

elop

men

tal C

ours

es1,

211

19.0

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f M

inne

sota

Off

ice

of I

nstit

utio

nal R

esea

rch

and

Re

port

ing

* E

nrol

lmen

t w

ithin

tw

o ye

ars

of

grad

uatio

n fo

r 20

05-2

008

grad

uate

s an

d w

ithin

one

yea

r of

gra

duat

ion

for

2009

gra

duat

es.

20

Page 33: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Sch

ool D

istr

ict

Hig

h S

choo

l G

radu

ates

***

Gra

duat

es W

ho T

ook

Dev

elop

men

tal

Cou

rses

at M

inne

sota

Pu

blic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n In

stitu

tions

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in

Min

neso

ta P

ublic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n

Gra

duat

es

Who

Too

k at

L

east

One

C

ours

e

% o

f Gra

ds in

M

n P

ublic

H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Tab

le 5

Su

mm

ary

Rep

ort

By

Hig

h S

cho

ol

Enr

olle

d a

t Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

esor

the

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta

Cau

tion

sho

uld

be e

xerc

ised

in in

terp

retin

g th

is s

umm

ary

. T

he c

olle

ge r

eadi

nes

s of

gra

duat

es

wh

enro

lled

in M

inn

esot

a pu

blic

col

lege

s or

uni

vers

ities

may

not

be

a g

ood

indi

cato

r of

the

colle

ge

read

ines

s of

all

grad

uate

s fr

om th

at h

igh

scho

ol.

Col

umn

H in

dica

tes

the

perc

ent

age

of a

ll gr

adu

ates

from

a h

igh

scho

ol th

at to

ok d

evel

opm

enta

l/rem

edia

l cou

rses

at p

ubl

ic c

olle

ges

or

univ

ersi

ties

in M

inne

sota

. H

igh

scho

ols

with

fiv

e or

few

er g

radu

ates

in d

evel

opm

enta

l cou

rses

ar e

not l

iste

d in

divi

dual

ly, b

ut a

re in

clud

ed a

s a

grou

p in

the

tota

ls a

t the

bot

tom

of t

his

repo

rt.

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

(G)

(H)

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ates

Min

neso

ta D

urin

g F

isca

l Yea

rs 2

006

to 2

010

Tot

al N

umbe

r o

f Gra

duat

es

in C

lass

es

2005

- 2

009

% o

f Tot

al

Gra

duat

es

in

Cla

sses

20

05 -

200

9

% o

f T

otal

G

radu

ates

20

05 -

200

9

A.C

.G.C

.A

.C.G

.C. S

EC

ON

DA

RY

214

696

9%22

%32

%30

9

AD

A-B

OR

UP

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TA

DA

-BO

RU

P S

EC

ON

DA

RY

112

325

5%16

%29

%20

5

AD

RIA

N P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

AD

RIA

N S

EC

ON

DA

RY

121

555

1%23

%45

%23

8

AF

SA

HIG

H S

CH

OO

LA

FS

A H

IGH

SC

HO

OL

94

514

7%25

%54

%20

1

AIT

KIN

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TA

ITK

IN S

EC

ON

DA

RY

SC

HO

OL

276

985

7%20

%36

%48

8

ALB

AN

Y P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

ALB

AN

Y S

EN

IOR

HIG

H37

510

86

2%18

%29

%60

9

ALB

ER

T L

EA

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TA

LBE

RT

LE

A S

EN

IOR

HIG

H68

821

45

9%18

%31

%1,

166

ALD

EN

-CO

NG

ER

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TA

LDE

N-C

ON

GE

R S

EC

ON

DA

RY

83

245

5%16

%29

%15

0

ALE

XA

ND

RIA

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TJE

FF

ER

SO

N S

EN

IOR

HIG

H91

423

55

8%15

%26

%1,

574

AN

NA

ND

ALE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TA

NN

AN

DA

LE S

EN

IOR

HIG

H41

511

85

9%17

%28

%69

9

AN

OK

A-H

EN

NE

PIN

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

.A

ND

OV

ER

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

1,04

845

46

1%27

%43

%1,

712

AN

OK

A-H

EN

NE

PIN

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

.A

NO

KA

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

1,53

865

96

1%26

%43

%2,

522

AN

OK

A-H

EN

NE

PIN

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

.B

LAIN

E S

EN

IOR

HIG

H1,

743

828

63%

30%

48%

2,7

69

AN

OK

A-H

EN

NE

PIN

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

.C

HA

MP

LIN

PA

RK

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

2,17

696

17

0%31

%44

%3,

125

AN

OK

A-H

EN

NE

PIN

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

.C

OO

N R

AP

IDS

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

1,69

779

26

5%30

%47

%2,

623

AN

OK

A-H

EN

NE

PIN

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

.C

RO

SS

RO

AD

S A

LTN

HIG

H S

CH

OO

L5

023

32%

15%

46%

155

AN

OK

A-H

EN

NE

PIN

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

.T

RA

NS

ITIO

N P

LUS

50

171

2%4%

34%

424

AS

HB

Y P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

AS

HB

Y S

EC

ON

DA

RY

89

307

1%24

%34

%12

5

AU

ST

IN P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

AU

ST

IN S

EN

IOR

HIG

H77

726

96

3%22

%35

%1,

226

AV

ALO

N S

CH

OO

LA

VA

LON

SC

HO

OL

60

204

3%14

%33

%14

1

BA

DG

ER

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TB

AD

GE

R S

EC

ON

DA

RY

37

136

5%23

%35

%57

** I

nd

ica

tes

tha

t th

ere

is n

o co

un

t o

f gra

du

ate

s fo

r th

is s

cho

ol.

In

mos

t ca

ses,

stu

dent

s at

tend

ed t

his

scho

ol a

nd r

epor

ted

to t

he c

olle

ge o

r un

iver

sity

that

the

y "g

radu

ated

" fr

om t

he s

choo

l. H

owev

er,

the

scho

ol d

oes

not

actu

ally

gra

nt t

he d

iplo

ma.

The

dip

lom

a is

typ

ical

ly g

rant

ed b

y an

othe

r hi

gh s

choo

l and

the

gra

duat

e is

the

refo

re r

epor

ted

in t

hat

high

sch

ool's

gra

duat

e co

unt.

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f M

inne

sota

Off

ice

of I

nstit

utio

nal R

esea

rch

and

Re

port

ing

***

The

num

bers

in c

olum

n D

are

und

uplic

ated

with

in M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

and

with

in th

e U

nive

rsity

of

Min

nes

ota.

F

or e

xam

ple,

if a

stu

dent

att

ende

d tw

o M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

in

stitu

tions

, tha

t st

ude

nt

is c

ount

ed o

ne t

ime

in t

he t

otal

for

thi

s ro

w.

Thi

s to

tal m

ay n

ot e

qual

the

tot

al p

rovi

ded

in o

ther

rep

orts

for

the

sam

e hi

gh s

choo

l whe

re t

he c

ount

is n

ot u

ndup

licat

ed.

* E

nrol

lmen

t w

ithin

tw

o ye

ars

of

grad

uatio

n fo

r 20

05-2

008

grad

uate

s an

d w

ithin

one

yea

r of

gra

duat

ion

for

2009

gra

duat

es.

21

Page 34: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Sch

ool D

istr

ict

Hig

h S

choo

l G

radu

ates

***

Gra

duat

es W

ho T

ook

Dev

elop

men

tal

Cou

rses

at M

inne

sota

Pu

blic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n In

stitu

tions

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in

Min

neso

ta P

ublic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n

Gra

duat

es

Who

Too

k at

L

east

One

C

ours

e

% o

f Gra

ds in

M

n P

ublic

H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Tab

le 5

Su

mm

ary

Rep

ort

By

Hig

h S

cho

ol

Enr

olle

d a

t Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

esor

the

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta

Cau

tion

sho

uld

be e

xerc

ised

in in

terp

retin

g th

is s

umm

ary

. T

he c

olle

ge r

eadi

nes

s of

gra

duat

es

wh

enro

lled

in M

inn

esot

a pu

blic

col

lege

s or

uni

vers

ities

may

not

be

a g

ood

indi

cato

r of

the

colle

ge

read

ines

s of

all

grad

uate

s fr

om th

at h

igh

scho

ol.

Col

umn

H in

dica

tes

the

perc

ent

age

of a

ll gr

adu

ates

from

a h

igh

scho

ol th

at to

ok d

evel

opm

enta

l/rem

edia

l cou

rses

at p

ubl

ic c

olle

ges

or

univ

ersi

ties

in M

inne

sota

. H

igh

scho

ols

with

fiv

e or

few

er g

radu

ates

in d

evel

opm

enta

l cou

rses

ar e

not l

iste

d in

divi

dual

ly, b

ut a

re in

clud

ed a

s a

grou

p in

the

tota

ls a

t the

bot

tom

of t

his

repo

rt.

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

(G)

(H)

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ates

Min

neso

ta D

urin

g F

isca

l Yea

rs 2

006

to 2

010

Tot

al N

umbe

r o

f Gra

duat

es

in C

lass

es

2005

- 2

009

% o

f Tot

al

Gra

duat

es

in

Cla

sses

20

05 -

200

9

% o

f T

otal

G

radu

ates

20

05 -

200

9

BA

GLE

Y P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

BA

GLE

Y S

EC

ON

DA

RY

191

775

6%22

%40

%34

4

BA

RN

ES

VIL

LE P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

BA

RN

ES

VIL

LE S

EC

ON

DA

RY

121

524

6%20

%43

%26

1

BA

RN

UM

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TB

AR

NU

M S

EC

ON

DA

RY

119

615

0%25

%51

%24

0

BA

TT

LE L

AK

E P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

BA

TT

LE L

AK

E S

EC

ON

DA

RY

119

465

5%21

%39

%21

6

BE

CK

ER

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TB

EC

KE

R S

EN

IOR

HIG

H39

511

04

9%14

%28

%80

1

BE

LGR

AD

E-B

RO

OT

EN

-ELR

OS

A S

CH

OO

L D

IST

BE

LGR

AD

E-B

RO

OT

EN

-ELR

OS

A S

EC

.18

260

65%

22%

33%

278

BE

LLE

PLA

INE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TB

ELL

E P

LAIN

E S

EN

IOR

HIG

H29

110

75

7%21

%37

%51

0

BE

MID

JI P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

BE

MID

JI S

EN

IOR

HIG

H86

623

76

0%16

%27

%1,

438

BE

NS

ON

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TB

EN

SO

N S

EC

ON

DA

RY

239

816

1%21

%34

%39

5

BE

RT

HA

-HE

WIT

T P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

BE

RT

HA

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y12

045

60%

23%

38%

200

BIG

LA

KE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TB

IG L

AK

E S

EN

IOR

HIG

H50

219

85

7%23

%39

%87

9

BIR

D IS

LA

ND

-OLI

VIA

-LA

KE

LIL

LIA

NB

OLD

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

246

906

5%24

%37

%37

8

BLA

CK

DU

CK

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TB

LAC

KD

UC

K S

EC

ON

DA

RY

170

796

6%31

%46

%25

9

BLO

OM

ING

PR

AIR

IE P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TB

LOO

MIN

G P

RA

IRIE

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y15

340

56%

15%

26%

271

BLO

OM

ING

TO

N P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

JEF

FE

RS

ON

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

980

308

55%

17%

31%

1,7

96

BLO

OM

ING

TO

N P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

KE

NN

ED

Y S

EN

IOR

HIG

H95

445

46

4%30

%48

%1,

499

BLU

E E

AR

TH

AR

EA

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

LB

LUE

EA

RT

H A

RE

A S

EN

IOR

HIG

H26

487

57%

19%

33%

466

BLU

ES

KY

CH

AR

TE

R S

CH

OO

LB

LU

ES

KY

CH

AR

TE

R S

CH

OO

L11

864

24%

13%

54%

490

BR

AH

AM

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TB

RA

HA

M A

RE

A S

EC

ON

DA

RY

162

805

1%25

%49

%31

5

BR

AIN

ER

D P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

BR

AIN

ER

D S

EN

IOR

HIG

H1,

362

381

63%

18%

28%

2,1

73

BR

AIN

ER

D P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

ISD

181

LE

AR

NIN

G C

EN

TE

R4

917

12%

4%35

%41

3

** I

nd

ica

tes

tha

t th

ere

is n

o co

un

t o

f gra

du

ate

s fo

r th

is s

cho

ol.

In

mos

t ca

ses,

stu

dent

s at

tend

ed t

his

scho

ol a

nd r

epor

ted

to t

he c

olle

ge o

r un

iver

sity

that

the

y "g

radu

ated

" fr

om t

he s

choo

l. H

owev

er,

the

scho

ol d

oes

not

actu

ally

gra

nt t

he d

iplo

ma.

The

dip

lom

a is

typ

ical

ly g

rant

ed b

y an

othe

r hi

gh s

choo

l and

the

gra

duat

e is

the

refo

re r

epor

ted

in t

hat

high

sch

ool's

gra

duat

e co

unt.

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f M

inne

sota

Off

ice

of I

nstit

utio

nal R

esea

rch

and

Re

port

ing

***

The

num

bers

in c

olum

n D

are

und

uplic

ated

with

in M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

and

with

in th

e U

nive

rsity

of

Min

nes

ota.

F

or e

xam

ple,

if a

stu

dent

att

ende

d tw

o M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

in

stitu

tions

, tha

t st

ude

nt

is c

ount

ed o

ne t

ime

in t

he t

otal

for

thi

s ro

w.

Thi

s to

tal m

ay n

ot e

qual

the

tot

al p

rovi

ded

in o

ther

rep

orts

for

the

sam

e hi

gh s

choo

l whe

re t

he c

ount

is n

ot u

ndup

licat

ed.

* E

nrol

lmen

t w

ithin

tw

o ye

ars

of

grad

uatio

n fo

r 20

05-2

008

grad

uate

s an

d w

ithin

one

yea

r of

gra

duat

ion

for

2009

gra

duat

es.

22

Page 35: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Sch

ool D

istr

ict

Hig

h S

choo

l G

radu

ates

***

Gra

duat

es W

ho T

ook

Dev

elop

men

tal

Cou

rses

at M

inne

sota

Pu

blic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n In

stitu

tions

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in

Min

neso

ta P

ublic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n

Gra

duat

es

Who

Too

k at

L

east

One

C

ours

e

% o

f Gra

ds in

M

n P

ublic

H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Tab

le 5

Su

mm

ary

Rep

ort

By

Hig

h S

cho

ol

Enr

olle

d a

t Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

esor

the

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta

Cau

tion

sho

uld

be e

xerc

ised

in in

terp

retin

g th

is s

umm

ary

. T

he c

olle

ge r

eadi

nes

s of

gra

duat

es

wh

enro

lled

in M

inn

esot

a pu

blic

col

lege

s or

uni

vers

ities

may

not

be

a g

ood

indi

cato

r of

the

colle

ge

read

ines

s of

all

grad

uate

s fr

om th

at h

igh

scho

ol.

Col

umn

H in

dica

tes

the

perc

ent

age

of a

ll gr

adu

ates

from

a h

igh

scho

ol th

at to

ok d

evel

opm

enta

l/rem

edia

l cou

rses

at p

ubl

ic c

olle

ges

or

univ

ersi

ties

in M

inne

sota

. H

igh

scho

ols

with

fiv

e or

few

er g

radu

ates

in d

evel

opm

enta

l cou

rses

ar e

not l

iste

d in

divi

dual

ly, b

ut a

re in

clud

ed a

s a

grou

p in

the

tota

ls a

t the

bot

tom

of t

his

repo

rt.

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

(G)

(H)

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ates

Min

neso

ta D

urin

g F

isca

l Yea

rs 2

006

to 2

010

Tot

al N

umbe

r o

f Gra

duat

es

in C

lass

es

2005

- 2

009

% o

f Tot

al

Gra

duat

es

in

Cla

sses

20

05 -

200

9

% o

f T

otal

G

radu

ates

20

05 -

200

9

BR

AN

DO

N P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

BR

AN

DO

N S

EC

ON

DA

RY

75

176

3%14

%23

%12

0

BR

EC

KE

NR

IDG

E P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

BR

EC

KE

NR

IDG

E S

EN

IOR

HIG

H9

621

26%

6%22

%37

0

BR

OO

KLY

N C

EN

TE

R S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TB

RO

OK

LYN

CE

NT

ER

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y26

915

96

4%38

%59

%42

1

BR

OW

ER

VIL

LE P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

BR

OW

ER

VIL

LE S

EC

ON

DA

RY

134

556

2%26

%41

%21

5

BU

FF

ALO

LA

KE

-HE

CT

OR

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

BU

FF

ALO

LA

KE

-HE

CT

OR

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y13

342

58%

18%

32%

229

BU

FF

ALO

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TB

UF

FA

LO S

EN

IOR

HIG

H99

437

15

0%19

%37

%1,

970

BU

RN

SV

ILLE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TB

UR

NS

VIL

LE A

RE

A L

EA

RN

ING

CE

NT

ER

46

2861

%**

BU

RN

SV

ILLE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TB

UR

NS

VIL

LE S

EN

IOR

HIG

H1,

867

695

63%

23%

37%

2,9

60

BU

TT

ER

FIE

LD

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TB

UT

TE

RF

IELD

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y4

518

53%

21%

40%

85

BY

RO

N P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

BY

RO

N S

EN

IOR

HIG

H S

CH

OO

L36

214

36

6%26

%40

%55

0

CA

LED

ON

IA P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

CA

LE

DO

NIA

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

172

593

7%13

%34

%47

0

CA

MB

RID

GE

-IS

AN

TI P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TC

AM

BR

IDG

E-I

SA

NT

I HIG

H S

CH

OO

L88

041

25

5%26

%47

%1,

608

CA

NB

Y P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

CA

NB

Y S

EC

ON

DA

RY

146

515

0%17

%35

%29

4

CA

NN

ON

FA

LLS

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TC

AN

NO

N F

ALL

S S

EC

.26

195

52%

19%

36%

499

CA

RLT

ON

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TC

AR

LTO

N S

EC

ON

DA

RY

142

576

1%24

%40

%23

4

CA

SS

LA

KE

-BE

NA

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

LSC

AS

S L

AK

E-B

EN

A S

EC

ON

DA

RY

89

525

3%31

%58

%16

7

CE

DA

R M

OU

NT

AIN

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

CE

DA

R M

OU

NT

AIN

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y9

430

54%

17%

32%

175

CE

NT

EN

NIA

L P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

CE

NT

EN

NIA

L S

EN

IOR

1,39

253

35

9%23

%38

%2,

341

CH

AT

FIE

LD P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OLS

CH

AT

FIE

LD S

EC

ON

DA

RY

144

594

9%20

%41

%29

3

CH

ISA

GO

LA

KE

S S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TC

HIS

AG

O L

AK

ES

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

631

233

51%

19%

37%

1,2

37

CH

ISH

OLM

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TC

HIS

HO

LM S

EC

ON

DA

RY

147

706

6%32

%48

%22

2

** I

nd

ica

tes

tha

t th

ere

is n

o co

un

t o

f gra

du

ate

s fo

r th

is s

cho

ol.

In

mos

t ca

ses,

stu

dent

s at

tend

ed t

his

scho

ol a

nd r

epor

ted

to t

he c

olle

ge o

r un

iver

sity

that

the

y "g

radu

ated

" fr

om t

he s

choo

l. H

owev

er,

the

scho

ol d

oes

not

actu

ally

gra

nt t

he d

iplo

ma.

The

dip

lom

a is

typ

ical

ly g

rant

ed b

y an

othe

r hi

gh s

choo

l and

the

gra

duat

e is

the

refo

re r

epor

ted

in t

hat

high

sch

ool's

gra

duat

e co

unt.

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f M

inne

sota

Off

ice

of I

nstit

utio

nal R

esea

rch

and

Re

port

ing

***

The

num

bers

in c

olum

n D

are

und

uplic

ated

with

in M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

and

with

in th

e U

nive

rsity

of

Min

nes

ota.

F

or e

xam

ple,

if a

stu

dent

att

ende

d tw

o M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

in

stitu

tions

, tha

t st

ude

nt

is c

ount

ed o

ne t

ime

in t

he t

otal

for

thi

s ro

w.

Thi

s to

tal m

ay n

ot e

qual

the

tot

al p

rovi

ded

in o

ther

rep

orts

for

the

sam

e hi

gh s

choo

l whe

re t

he c

ount

is n

ot u

ndup

licat

ed.

* E

nrol

lmen

t w

ithin

tw

o ye

ars

of

grad

uatio

n fo

r 20

05-2

008

grad

uate

s an

d w

ithin

one

yea

r of

gra

duat

ion

for

2009

gra

duat

es.

23

Page 36: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Sch

ool D

istr

ict

Hig

h S

choo

l G

radu

ates

***

Gra

duat

es W

ho T

ook

Dev

elop

men

tal

Cou

rses

at M

inne

sota

Pu

blic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n In

stitu

tions

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in

Min

neso

ta P

ublic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n

Gra

duat

es

Who

Too

k at

L

east

One

C

ours

e

% o

f Gra

ds in

M

n P

ublic

H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Tab

le 5

Su

mm

ary

Rep

ort

By

Hig

h S

cho

ol

Enr

olle

d a

t Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

esor

the

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta

Cau

tion

sho

uld

be e

xerc

ised

in in

terp

retin

g th

is s

umm

ary

. T

he c

olle

ge r

eadi

nes

s of

gra

duat

es

wh

enro

lled

in M

inn

esot

a pu

blic

col

lege

s or

uni

vers

ities

may

not

be

a g

ood

indi

cato

r of

the

colle

ge

read

ines

s of

all

grad

uate

s fr

om th

at h

igh

scho

ol.

Col

umn

H in

dica

tes

the

perc

ent

age

of a

ll gr

adu

ates

from

a h

igh

scho

ol th

at to

ok d

evel

opm

enta

l/rem

edia

l cou

rses

at p

ubl

ic c

olle

ges

or

univ

ersi

ties

in M

inne

sota

. H

igh

scho

ols

with

fiv

e or

few

er g

radu

ates

in d

evel

opm

enta

l cou

rses

ar e

not l

iste

d in

divi

dual

ly, b

ut a

re in

clud

ed a

s a

grou

p in

the

tota

ls a

t the

bot

tom

of t

his

repo

rt.

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

(G)

(H)

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ates

Min

neso

ta D

urin

g F

isca

l Yea

rs 2

006

to 2

010

Tot

al N

umbe

r o

f Gra

duat

es

in C

lass

es

2005

- 2

009

% o

f Tot

al

Gra

duat

es

in

Cla

sses

20

05 -

200

9

% o

f T

otal

G

radu

ates

20

05 -

200

9

CH

OK

IO-A

LBE

RT

A P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

CH

OK

IO-A

LB

ER

TA

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y5

89

67%

10%

16%

87

CIT

Y A

CA

DE

MY

CIT

Y A

CA

DE

MY

93

792

3%20

%85

%40

3

CLE

AR

BR

OO

K-G

ON

VIC

K S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TC

LEA

RB

RO

OK

-GO

NV

ICK

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y9

338

62%

25%

41%

151

CLE

VE

LAN

D P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

CLE

VE

LAN

D S

EC

ON

DA

RY

100

356

0%21

%35

%16

6

CLI

MA

X P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

CLI

MA

X S

EC

ON

DA

RY

20

63

8%12

%30

%52

CLI

NT

ON

-GR

AC

EV

ILL

E-B

EA

RD

SLE

YC

LIN

TO

N-G

RA

CE

VIL

LE-B

EA

RD

SLE

Y S

R.

100

195

1%10

%19

%19

6

CLO

QU

ET

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TC

LOQ

UE

T S

EN

IOR

429

178

57%

24%

41%

749

CO

LUM

BIA

HE

IGH

TS

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

CO

LUM

BIA

HE

IGH

TS

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

418

222

51%

27%

53%

821

CO

MF

RE

Y P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

CO

MF

RE

Y S

EC

ON

DA

RY

39

215

4%29

%54

%72

CO

MM

UN

ITY

OF

PE

AC

E A

CA

DE

MY

CO

MM

UN

ITY

OF

PE

AC

E A

CA

DE

MY

SE

C.

88

476

5%35

%53

%13

5

CO

OK

CO

UN

TY

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

LSC

OO

K C

OU

NT

Y S

EN

IOR

HIG

H12

855

52%

22%

43%

246

CR

OM

WE

LL-W

RIG

HT

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

LSC

RO

MW

ELL

-WR

IGH

T S

EC

ON

DA

RY

56

295

0%26

%52

%11

3

CR

OO

KS

TO

N P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

CR

OO

KS

TO

N S

EC

ON

DA

RY

272

127

50%

23%

47%

548

CR

OS

BY

-IR

ON

TO

N P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

CR

OS

BY

-IR

ON

TO

N S

EC

ON

DA

RY

310

906

6%19

%29

%47

3

DA

SS

EL-

CO

KA

TO

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

.D

AS

SE

L-C

OK

AT

O S

EN

IOR

HIG

H39

716

65

3%22

%42

%75

3

DA

WS

ON

-BO

YD

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TD

AW

SO

N-B

OY

D S

EC

ON

DA

RY

138

646

7%31

%46

%20

6

DE

ER

RIV

ER

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TD

EE

R R

IVE

R S

EC

ON

DA

RY

193

100

57%

29%

52%

341

DE

LAN

O P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

DE

LA

NO

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

374

107

49%

14%

29%

765

DE

TR

OIT

LA

KE

S P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

DE

TR

OIT

LA

KE

S S

EN

IOR

HIG

H47

613

75

4%16

%29

%88

0

DIL

WO

RT

H-G

LYN

DO

N-F

ELT

ON

DIL

WO

RT

H-G

LYN

DO

N-F

ELT

ON

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

193

664

8%16

%34

%40

4

DO

VE

R-E

YO

TA

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TD

OV

ER

-EY

OT

A H

IGH

SC

HO

OL

241

876

0%22

%36

%40

1

** I

nd

ica

tes

tha

t th

ere

is n

o co

un

t o

f gra

du

ate

s fo

r th

is s

cho

ol.

In

mos

t ca

ses,

stu

dent

s at

tend

ed t

his

scho

ol a

nd r

epor

ted

to t

he c

olle

ge o

r un

iver

sity

that

the

y "g

radu

ated

" fr

om t

he s

choo

l. H

owev

er,

the

scho

ol d

oes

not

actu

ally

gra

nt t

he d

iplo

ma.

The

dip

lom

a is

typ

ical

ly g

rant

ed b

y an

othe

r hi

gh s

choo

l and

the

gra

duat

e is

the

refo

re r

epor

ted

in t

hat

high

sch

ool's

gra

duat

e co

unt.

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f M

inne

sota

Off

ice

of I

nstit

utio

nal R

esea

rch

and

Re

port

ing

***

The

num

bers

in c

olum

n D

are

und

uplic

ated

with

in M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

and

with

in th

e U

nive

rsity

of

Min

nes

ota.

F

or e

xam

ple,

if a

stu

dent

att

ende

d tw

o M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

in

stitu

tions

, tha

t st

ude

nt

is c

ount

ed o

ne t

ime

in t

he t

otal

for

thi

s ro

w.

Thi

s to

tal m

ay n

ot e

qual

the

tot

al p

rovi

ded

in o

ther

rep

orts

for

the

sam

e hi

gh s

choo

l whe

re t

he c

ount

is n

ot u

ndup

licat

ed.

* E

nrol

lmen

t w

ithin

tw

o ye

ars

of

grad

uatio

n fo

r 20

05-2

008

grad

uate

s an

d w

ithin

one

yea

r of

gra

duat

ion

for

2009

gra

duat

es.

24

Page 37: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Sch

ool D

istr

ict

Hig

h S

choo

l G

radu

ates

***

Gra

duat

es W

ho T

ook

Dev

elop

men

tal

Cou

rses

at M

inne

sota

Pu

blic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n In

stitu

tions

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in

Min

neso

ta P

ublic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n

Gra

duat

es

Who

Too

k at

L

east

One

C

ours

e

% o

f Gra

ds in

M

n P

ublic

H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Tab

le 5

Su

mm

ary

Rep

ort

By

Hig

h S

cho

ol

Enr

olle

d a

t Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

esor

the

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta

Cau

tion

sho

uld

be e

xerc

ised

in in

terp

retin

g th

is s

umm

ary

. T

he c

olle

ge r

eadi

nes

s of

gra

duat

es

wh

enro

lled

in M

inn

esot

a pu

blic

col

lege

s or

uni

vers

ities

may

not

be

a g

ood

indi

cato

r of

the

colle

ge

read

ines

s of

all

grad

uate

s fr

om th

at h

igh

scho

ol.

Col

umn

H in

dica

tes

the

perc

ent

age

of a

ll gr

adu

ates

from

a h

igh

scho

ol th

at to

ok d

evel

opm

enta

l/rem

edia

l cou

rses

at p

ubl

ic c

olle

ges

or

univ

ersi

ties

in M

inne

sota

. H

igh

scho

ols

with

fiv

e or

few

er g

radu

ates

in d

evel

opm

enta

l cou

rses

ar e

not l

iste

d in

divi

dual

ly, b

ut a

re in

clud

ed a

s a

grou

p in

the

tota

ls a

t the

bot

tom

of t

his

repo

rt.

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

(G)

(H)

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ates

Min

neso

ta D

urin

g F

isca

l Yea

rs 2

006

to 2

010

Tot

al N

umbe

r o

f Gra

duat

es

in C

lass

es

2005

- 2

009

% o

f Tot

al

Gra

duat

es

in

Cla

sses

20

05 -

200

9

% o

f T

otal

G

radu

ates

20

05 -

200

9

DU

LUT

H P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

CE

NT

RA

L S

EN

IOR

HIG

H60

424

65

3%22

%41

%1,

130

DU

LUT

H P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

DE

NF

ELD

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

536

252

49%

23%

47%

1,0

95

DU

LUT

H P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

EA

ST

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

796

254

51%

16%

32%

1,5

76

E.C

.H.O

. CH

AR

TE

R S

CH

OO

LE

.C.H

.O. C

HA

RT

ER

SC

HO

OL

36

165

5%25

%44

%65

EA

GLE

VA

LLE

Y P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

EA

GLE

VA

LLE

Y S

EC

ON

DA

RY

87

297

1%24

%33

%12

2

EA

ST

CE

NT

RA

L S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TE

AS

T C

EN

TR

AL

SE

NIO

R S

EC

ON

DA

RY

123

555

3%24

%45

%23

1

EA

ST

GR

AN

D F

OR

KS

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

EA

ST

GR

AN

D F

OR

KS

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

313

139

49%

22%

44%

636

EA

ST

ER

N C

AR

VE

R C

OU

NT

Y P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

CH

AS

KA

HIG

H S

CH

OO

L1,

390

449

53%

17%

32%

2,6

28

ED

EN

PR

AIR

IE P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

ED

EN

PR

AIR

IE S

EN

IOR

HIG

H1,

841

525

51%

14%

29%

3,6

23

ED

EN

VA

LLE

Y-W

AT

KIN

S S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TE

DE

N V

ALL

EY

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y17

561

57%

20%

35%

306

ED

GE

RT

ON

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TE

DG

ER

TO

N S

EC

ON

DA

RY

51

164

1%13

%31

%12

3

ED

INA

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TE

DIN

A S

EN

IOR

HIG

H89

220

83

4%8%

23%

2,5

99

ELK

RIV

ER

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TE

LK R

IVE

R S

EN

IOR

HIG

H1,

200

468

60%

23%

39%

2,0

10

ELK

RIV

ER

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TIV

AN

SA

ND

CO

MM

UN

ITY

SC

HO

OL-

DA

Y3

020

26%

17%

67%

117

ELK

RIV

ER

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TR

OG

ER

S S

EN

IOR

HIG

H67

629

45

9%25

%43

%1,

153

ELK

RIV

ER

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TZ

IMM

ER

MA

N H

IGH

SC

HO

OL

289

111

57%

22%

38%

510

ELL

SW

OR

TH

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TE

LLS

WO

RT

H S

EC

ON

DA

RY

39

203

7%19

%51

%10

6

ELY

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TM

EM

OR

IAL

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y16

364

62%

24%

39%

263

ES

KO

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TLI

NC

OLN

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y28

010

76

2%24

%38

%45

1

EV

AN

SV

ILLE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TE

VA

NS

VIL

LE

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y4

19

57%

13%

22%

72

EV

ELE

TH

-GIL

BE

RT

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

EV

ELE

TH

-GIL

BE

RT

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

309

135

69%

30%

44%

449

** I

nd

ica

tes

tha

t th

ere

is n

o co

un

t o

f gra

du

ate

s fo

r th

is s

cho

ol.

In

mos

t ca

ses,

stu

dent

s at

tend

ed t

his

scho

ol a

nd r

epor

ted

to t

he c

olle

ge o

r un

iver

sity

that

the

y "g

radu

ated

" fr

om t

he s

choo

l. H

owev

er,

the

scho

ol d

oes

not

actu

ally

gra

nt t

he d

iplo

ma.

The

dip

lom

a is

typ

ical

ly g

rant

ed b

y an

othe

r hi

gh s

choo

l and

the

gra

duat

e is

the

refo

re r

epor

ted

in t

hat

high

sch

ool's

gra

duat

e co

unt.

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f M

inne

sota

Off

ice

of I

nstit

utio

nal R

esea

rch

and

Re

port

ing

***

The

num

bers

in c

olum

n D

are

und

uplic

ated

with

in M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

and

with

in th

e U

nive

rsity

of

Min

nes

ota.

F

or e

xam

ple,

if a

stu

dent

att

ende

d tw

o M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

in

stitu

tions

, tha

t st

ude

nt

is c

ount

ed o

ne t

ime

in t

he t

otal

for

thi

s ro

w.

Thi

s to

tal m

ay n

ot e

qual

the

tot

al p

rovi

ded

in o

ther

rep

orts

for

the

sam

e hi

gh s

choo

l whe

re t

he c

ount

is n

ot u

ndup

licat

ed.

* E

nrol

lmen

t w

ithin

tw

o ye

ars

of

grad

uatio

n fo

r 20

05-2

008

grad

uate

s an

d w

ithin

one

yea

r of

gra

duat

ion

for

2009

gra

duat

es.

25

Page 38: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Sch

ool D

istr

ict

Hig

h S

choo

l G

radu

ates

***

Gra

duat

es W

ho T

ook

Dev

elop

men

tal

Cou

rses

at M

inne

sota

Pu

blic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n In

stitu

tions

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in

Min

neso

ta P

ublic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n

Gra

duat

es

Who

Too

k at

L

east

One

C

ours

e

% o

f Gra

ds in

M

n P

ublic

H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Tab

le 5

Su

mm

ary

Rep

ort

By

Hig

h S

cho

ol

Enr

olle

d a

t Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

esor

the

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta

Cau

tion

sho

uld

be e

xerc

ised

in in

terp

retin

g th

is s

umm

ary

. T

he c

olle

ge r

eadi

nes

s of

gra

duat

es

wh

enro

lled

in M

inn

esot

a pu

blic

col

lege

s or

uni

vers

ities

may

not

be

a g

ood

indi

cato

r of

the

colle

ge

read

ines

s of

all

grad

uate

s fr

om th

at h

igh

scho

ol.

Col

umn

H in

dica

tes

the

perc

ent

age

of a

ll gr

adu

ates

from

a h

igh

scho

ol th

at to

ok d

evel

opm

enta

l/rem

edia

l cou

rses

at p

ubl

ic c

olle

ges

or

univ

ersi

ties

in M

inne

sota

. H

igh

scho

ols

with

fiv

e or

few

er g

radu

ates

in d

evel

opm

enta

l cou

rses

ar e

not l

iste

d in

divi

dual

ly, b

ut a

re in

clud

ed a

s a

grou

p in

the

tota

ls a

t the

bot

tom

of t

his

repo

rt.

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

(G)

(H)

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ates

Min

neso

ta D

urin

g F

isca

l Yea

rs 2

006

to 2

010

Tot

al N

umbe

r o

f Gra

duat

es

in C

lass

es

2005

- 2

009

% o

f Tot

al

Gra

duat

es

in

Cla

sses

20

05 -

200

9

% o

f T

otal

G

radu

ates

20

05 -

200

9

FA

IRM

ON

T A

RE

A S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TF

AIR

MO

NT

HIG

H27

561

44%

10%

22%

630

FA

RIB

AU

LT P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

FA

RIB

AU

LT S

EN

IOR

HIG

H68

832

75

6%27

%48

%1,

232

FA

RM

ING

TO

N P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

FA

RM

ING

TO

N H

IGH

SC

HO

OL

840

331

54%

21%

39%

1,5

52

FE

RG

US

FA

LLS

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TK

EN

NE

DY

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y S

CH

OO

L55

223

66

0%26

%43

%91

6

FE

RT

ILE

-BE

LTR

AM

I SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

FE

RT

ILE

-BE

LTR

AM

I SE

CO

ND

AR

Y11

047

49%

21%

43%

225

FIL

LMO

RE

CE

NT

RA

LF

ILLM

OR

E C

EN

TR

AL

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

144

605

6%23

%42

%25

7

FIS

HE

R P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

FIS

HE

R S

EC

ON

DA

RY

59

275

6%25

%46

%10

6

FLO

OD

WO

OD

PU

BL

IC S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TF

LOO

DW

OO

D S

EC

ON

DA

RY

94

466

5%32

%49

%14

4

FO

LEY

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TF

OLE

Y S

EN

IOR

HIG

H35

687

57%

14%

24%

622

FO

RE

ST

LA

KE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TF

OR

ES

T L

AK

E A

RE

A L

EA

RN

ING

CE

NT

ER

26

172

3%15

%65

%11

3

FO

RE

ST

LA

KE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TF

OR

ES

T L

AK

E S

EN

IOR

HIG

H1,

336

642

52%

25%

48%

2,5

57

FO

SS

TO

N P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

FO

SS

TO

N S

EC

ON

DA

RY

116

455

2%20

%39

%22

5

FO

UR

DIR

EC

TIO

NS

CH

AR

TE

R S

CH

OO

LSF

OU

R D

IRE

CT

ION

S C

HA

RT

ER

SC

HO

OLS

21

162

2%16

%76

%97

FR

AZ

EE

-VE

RG

AS

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

.F

RA

ZE

E S

EC

ON

DA

RY

217

765

5%19

%35

%39

5

FR

IDLE

Y P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

FR

IDLE

Y S

EN

IOR

HIG

H48

523

65

9%29

%49

%82

5

FU

LDA

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TF

ULD

A S

EC

ON

DA

RY

124

375

1%15

%30

%24

1

G.F

.W.

G.F

.W. S

R.

215

816

2%23

%38

%34

5

GLE

NC

OE

-SIL

VE

R L

AK

E S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TG

LEN

CO

E-S

ILV

ER

LA

KE

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

403

150

62%

23%

37%

653

GLE

NV

ILLE

-EM

MO

NS

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

GLE

NV

ILLE

-EM

MO

NS

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y7

322

50%

15%

30%

145

GO

OD

HU

E P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

GO

OD

HU

E S

EC

ON

DA

RY

132

616

0%28

%46

%22

0

GO

OD

RID

GE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TG

OO

DR

IDG

E S

EC

ON

DA

RY

43

146

7%22

%33

%64

** I

nd

ica

tes

tha

t th

ere

is n

o co

un

t o

f gra

du

ate

s fo

r th

is s

cho

ol.

In

mos

t ca

ses,

stu

dent

s at

tend

ed t

his

scho

ol a

nd r

epor

ted

to t

he c

olle

ge o

r un

iver

sity

that

the

y "g

radu

ated

" fr

om t

he s

choo

l. H

owev

er,

the

scho

ol d

oes

not

actu

ally

gra

nt t

he d

iplo

ma.

The

dip

lom

a is

typ

ical

ly g

rant

ed b

y an

othe

r hi

gh s

choo

l and

the

gra

duat

e is

the

refo

re r

epor

ted

in t

hat

high

sch

ool's

gra

duat

e co

unt.

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f M

inne

sota

Off

ice

of I

nstit

utio

nal R

esea

rch

and

Re

port

ing

***

The

num

bers

in c

olum

n D

are

und

uplic

ated

with

in M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

and

with

in th

e U

nive

rsity

of

Min

nes

ota.

F

or e

xam

ple,

if a

stu

dent

att

ende

d tw

o M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

in

stitu

tions

, tha

t st

ude

nt

is c

ount

ed o

ne t

ime

in t

he t

otal

for

thi

s ro

w.

Thi

s to

tal m

ay n

ot e

qual

the

tot

al p

rovi

ded

in o

ther

rep

orts

for

the

sam

e hi

gh s

choo

l whe

re t

he c

ount

is n

ot u

ndup

licat

ed.

* E

nrol

lmen

t w

ithin

tw

o ye

ars

of

grad

uatio

n fo

r 20

05-2

008

grad

uate

s an

d w

ithin

one

yea

r of

gra

duat

ion

for

2009

gra

duat

es.

26

Page 39: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Sch

ool D

istr

ict

Hig

h S

choo

l G

radu

ates

***

Gra

duat

es W

ho T

ook

Dev

elop

men

tal

Cou

rses

at M

inne

sota

Pu

blic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n In

stitu

tions

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in

Min

neso

ta P

ublic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n

Gra

duat

es

Who

Too

k at

L

east

One

C

ours

e

% o

f Gra

ds in

M

n P

ublic

H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Tab

le 5

Su

mm

ary

Rep

ort

By

Hig

h S

cho

ol

Enr

olle

d a

t Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

esor

the

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta

Cau

tion

sho

uld

be e

xerc

ised

in in

terp

retin

g th

is s

umm

ary

. T

he c

olle

ge r

eadi

nes

s of

gra

duat

es

wh

enro

lled

in M

inn

esot

a pu

blic

col

lege

s or

uni

vers

ities

may

not

be

a g

ood

indi

cato

r of

the

colle

ge

read

ines

s of

all

grad

uate

s fr

om th

at h

igh

scho

ol.

Col

umn

H in

dica

tes

the

perc

ent

age

of a

ll gr

adu

ates

from

a h

igh

scho

ol th

at to

ok d

evel

opm

enta

l/rem

edia

l cou

rses

at p

ubl

ic c

olle

ges

or

univ

ersi

ties

in M

inne

sota

. H

igh

scho

ols

with

fiv

e or

few

er g

radu

ates

in d

evel

opm

enta

l cou

rses

ar e

not l

iste

d in

divi

dual

ly, b

ut a

re in

clud

ed a

s a

grou

p in

the

tota

ls a

t the

bot

tom

of t

his

repo

rt.

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

(G)

(H)

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ates

Min

neso

ta D

urin

g F

isca

l Yea

rs 2

006

to 2

010

Tot

al N

umbe

r o

f Gra

duat

es

in C

lass

es

2005

- 2

009

% o

f Tot

al

Gra

duat

es

in

Cla

sses

20

05 -

200

9

% o

f T

otal

G

radu

ates

20

05 -

200

9

GR

AN

AD

A H

UN

TLE

Y-E

AS

T C

HA

ING

RA

NA

DA

-HU

NT

LEY

EA

ST

CH

AIN

SE

C.

60

124

5%9%

20%

132

GR

AN

D M

EA

DO

W P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

GR

AN

D M

EA

DO

W S

EN

IOR

HIG

H7

728

51%

19%

36%

151

GR

AN

D R

AP

IDS

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TB

IGF

OR

K S

EC

ON

DA

RY

63

386

5%39

%60

%97

GR

AN

D R

AP

IDS

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TG

RA

ND

RA

PID

S S

EN

IOR

HIG

H87

136

76

6%28

%42

%1,

321

GR

EA

T R

IVE

R S

CH

OO

LG

RE

AT

RIV

ER

SC

HO

OL

20

84

3%17

%40

%46

GR

EE

NB

US

H-M

IDD

LE R

IVE

R S

CH

OO

L D

IST

.G

RE

EN

BU

SH

-MID

DLE

RIV

ER

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

115

356

7%20

%30

%17

2

GR

EE

NW

AY

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TG

RE

EN

WA

Y S

EN

IOR

HIG

H28

311

47

3%29

%40

%39

0

GR

YG

LA P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

GR

YG

LA S

EC

ON

DA

RY

64

317

2%35

%48

%89

HA

NC

OC

K P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

HA

NC

OC

K S

EC

.5

519

56%

19%

35%

99

HA

RB

OR

CIT

Y IN

TE

RN

AT

ION

AL

CH

AR

TE

RH

AR

BO

R C

ITY

IN

TE

RN

AT

ION

AL

CH

AR

TE

R8

648

41%

23%

56%

212

HA

ST

ING

S P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

HA

ST

ING

S H

IGH

SC

HO

OL

1,00

538

55

2%20

%38

%1,

942

HA

WLE

Y P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

HA

WLE

Y S

EC

ON

DA

RY

166

534

8%15

%32

%34

3

HA

YF

IELD

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TH

AY

FIE

LD S

EC

.19

580

58%

24%

41%

336

HE

NN

ING

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TH

EN

NIN

G S

EC

ON

DA

RY

90

337

0%26

%37

%12

8

HE

RM

AN

-NO

RC

RO

SS

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

HE

RM

AN

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y2

99

66%

20%

31%

44

HE

RM

AN

TO

WN

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TH

ER

MA

NT

OW

N S

EN

IOR

HIG

H41

916

25

5%21

%39

%76

4

HE

RO

N L

AK

E-O

KA

BE

NA

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

SO

UT

HW

ES

T S

TA

R C

ON

CE

PT

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y9

846

55%

26%

47%

178

HIB

BIN

G P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

HIB

BIN

G H

IGH

597

210

66%

23%

35%

898

HIG

H S

CH

OO

L F

OR

RE

CO

RD

ING

AR

TS

HIG

H S

CH

OO

L F

OR

RE

CO

RD

ING

AR

TS

58

423

3%24

%72

%17

7

HIG

HE

R G

RO

UN

D A

CA

DE

MY

HIG

HE

R G

RO

UN

D A

CA

DE

MY

62

437

0%49

%69

%88

HIL

L C

ITY

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TH

ILL

CIT

Y S

EC

ON

DA

RY

90

456

3%31

%50

%14

3

** I

nd

ica

tes

tha

t th

ere

is n

o co

un

t o

f gra

du

ate

s fo

r th

is s

cho

ol.

In

mos

t ca

ses,

stu

dent

s at

tend

ed t

his

scho

ol a

nd r

epor

ted

to t

he c

olle

ge o

r un

iver

sity

that

the

y "g

radu

ated

" fr

om t

he s

choo

l. H

owev

er,

the

scho

ol d

oes

not

actu

ally

gra

nt t

he d

iplo

ma.

The

dip

lom

a is

typ

ical

ly g

rant

ed b

y an

othe

r hi

gh s

choo

l and

the

gra

duat

e is

the

refo

re r

epor

ted

in t

hat

high

sch

ool's

gra

duat

e co

unt.

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f M

inne

sota

Off

ice

of I

nstit

utio

nal R

esea

rch

and

Re

port

ing

***

The

num

bers

in c

olum

n D

are

und

uplic

ated

with

in M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

and

with

in th

e U

nive

rsity

of

Min

nes

ota.

F

or e

xam

ple,

if a

stu

dent

att

ende

d tw

o M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

in

stitu

tions

, tha

t st

ude

nt

is c

ount

ed o

ne t

ime

in t

he t

otal

for

thi

s ro

w.

Thi

s to

tal m

ay n

ot e

qual

the

tot

al p

rovi

ded

in o

ther

rep

orts

for

the

sam

e hi

gh s

choo

l whe

re t

he c

ount

is n

ot u

ndup

licat

ed.

* E

nrol

lmen

t w

ithin

tw

o ye

ars

of

grad

uatio

n fo

r 20

05-2

008

grad

uate

s an

d w

ithin

one

yea

r of

gra

duat

ion

for

2009

gra

duat

es.

27

Page 40: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Sch

ool D

istr

ict

Hig

h S

choo

l G

radu

ates

***

Gra

duat

es W

ho T

ook

Dev

elop

men

tal

Cou

rses

at M

inne

sota

Pu

blic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n In

stitu

tions

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in

Min

neso

ta P

ublic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n

Gra

duat

es

Who

Too

k at

L

east

One

C

ours

e

% o

f Gra

ds in

M

n P

ublic

H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Tab

le 5

Su

mm

ary

Rep

ort

By

Hig

h S

cho

ol

Enr

olle

d a

t Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

esor

the

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta

Cau

tion

sho

uld

be e

xerc

ised

in in

terp

retin

g th

is s

umm

ary

. T

he c

olle

ge r

eadi

nes

s of

gra

duat

es

wh

enro

lled

in M

inn

esot

a pu

blic

col

lege

s or

uni

vers

ities

may

not

be

a g

ood

indi

cato

r of

the

colle

ge

read

ines

s of

all

grad

uate

s fr

om th

at h

igh

scho

ol.

Col

umn

H in

dica

tes

the

perc

ent

age

of a

ll gr

adu

ates

from

a h

igh

scho

ol th

at to

ok d

evel

opm

enta

l/rem

edia

l cou

rses

at p

ubl

ic c

olle

ges

or

univ

ersi

ties

in M

inne

sota

. H

igh

scho

ols

with

fiv

e or

few

er g

radu

ates

in d

evel

opm

enta

l cou

rses

ar e

not l

iste

d in

divi

dual

ly, b

ut a

re in

clud

ed a

s a

grou

p in

the

tota

ls a

t the

bot

tom

of t

his

repo

rt.

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

(G)

(H)

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ates

Min

neso

ta D

urin

g F

isca

l Yea

rs 2

006

to 2

010

Tot

al N

umbe

r o

f Gra

duat

es

in C

lass

es

2005

- 2

009

% o

f Tot

al

Gra

duat

es

in

Cla

sses

20

05 -

200

9

% o

f T

otal

G

radu

ates

20

05 -

200

9

HIL

LS-B

EA

VE

R C

RE

EK

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

HIL

LS-B

EA

VE

R C

RE

EK

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y4

526

34%

20%

58%

132

HIN

CK

LEY

-FIN

LAY

SO

N S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TH

INC

KLE

Y-F

INLA

YS

ON

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y18

374

52%

21%

40%

352

HM

ON

G C

OLL

EG

E P

RE

P A

CA

DE

MY

HM

ON

G C

OLL

EG

E P

RE

P A

CA

DE

MY

HS

55

383

1%21

%69

%17

8

HO

LDIN

GF

OR

D P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

HO

LDIN

GF

OR

D S

EC

ON

DA

RY

242

556

0%14

%23

%40

1

HO

PK

INS

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TH

OP

KIN

S S

EN

IOR

HIG

H1,

261

469

43%

16%

37%

2,9

42

HO

US

TO

N P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

HO

US

TO

N S

EC

ON

DA

RY

84

415

3%26

%49

%15

8

HO

WA

RD

LA

KE

-WA

VE

RLY

-WIN

ST

ED

HO

WA

RD

LA

KE

-WA

VE

RLY

-WIN

ST

ED

SE

C.

209

775

4%20

%37

%38

6

HU

TC

HIN

SO

N P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

HU

TC

HIN

SO

N S

EN

IOR

HIG

H65

125

56

1%24

%39

%1,

075

INT

ER

ME

DIA

TE

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

287

281

HIG

HV

IEW

ALT

ER

NA

TIV

E P

RO

GR

AM

36

229

7%59

%61

%37

INT

ER

NA

TIO

NA

L F

ALL

S S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TF

AL

LS S

EC

ON

DA

RY

288

816

0%17

%28

%48

1

INV

ER

GR

OV

E H

EIG

HT

S S

CH

OO

LSS

IMLE

Y S

EN

IOR

HIG

H73

429

86

4%26

%41

%1,

145

ISLE

PU

BL

IC S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TIS

LE S

EC

ON

DA

RY

91

335

0%18

%36

%18

1

IVA

NH

OE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TLI

NC

OLN

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y7

125

48%

17%

35%

147

JAC

KS

ON

CO

UN

TY

CE

NT

RA

L S

CH

OO

L D

IST

.JA

CK

SO

N C

OU

NT

Y C

EN

TR

AL

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

225

615

0%14

%27

%44

6

JAN

ES

VIL

LE

-WA

LDO

RF

-PE

MB

ER

TO

NJA

NE

SV

ILLE

-WA

LDO

RF

-PE

MB

ER

TO

N S

EC

137

536

2%24

%39

%22

2

JEN

NIN

GS

CO

MM

UN

ITY

LE

AR

NIN

G C

EN

TE

RJE

NN

ING

S E

XP

ER

IEN

TIA

L H

IGH

SC

HO

OL

26

152

8%16

%58

%92

JOR

DA

N P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

JOR

DA

N S

EC

ON

DA

RY

291

995

5%19

%34

%53

0

KA

SS

ON

-MA

NT

OR

VIL

LE S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TK

AS

SO

N-M

AN

TO

RV

ILLE

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

378

144

60%

23%

38%

627

KE

LLIH

ER

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TK

ELL

IHE

R S

EC

ON

DA

RY

50

216

1%26

%42

%82

KE

NY

ON

-WA

NA

MIN

GO

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

KE

NY

ON

-WA

NA

MIN

GO

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

158

734

8%22

%46

%33

1

KE

RK

HO

VE

N-M

UR

DO

CK

-SU

NB

UR

GK

ER

KH

OV

EN

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y11

863

58%

31%

53%

203

** I

nd

ica

tes

tha

t th

ere

is n

o co

un

t o

f gra

du

ate

s fo

r th

is s

cho

ol.

In

mos

t ca

ses,

stu

dent

s at

tend

ed t

his

scho

ol a

nd r

epor

ted

to t

he c

olle

ge o

r un

iver

sity

that

the

y "g

radu

ated

" fr

om t

he s

choo

l. H

owev

er,

the

scho

ol d

oes

not

actu

ally

gra

nt t

he d

iplo

ma.

The

dip

lom

a is

typ

ical

ly g

rant

ed b

y an

othe

r hi

gh s

choo

l and

the

gra

duat

e is

the

refo

re r

epor

ted

in t

hat

high

sch

ool's

gra

duat

e co

unt.

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f M

inne

sota

Off

ice

of I

nstit

utio

nal R

esea

rch

and

Re

port

ing

***

The

num

bers

in c

olum

n D

are

und

uplic

ated

with

in M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

and

with

in th

e U

nive

rsity

of

Min

nes

ota.

F

or e

xam

ple,

if a

stu

dent

att

ende

d tw

o M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

in

stitu

tions

, tha

t st

ude

nt

is c

ount

ed o

ne t

ime

in t

he t

otal

for

thi

s ro

w.

Thi

s to

tal m

ay n

ot e

qual

the

tot

al p

rovi

ded

in o

ther

rep

orts

for

the

sam

e hi

gh s

choo

l whe

re t

he c

ount

is n

ot u

ndup

licat

ed.

* E

nrol

lmen

t w

ithin

tw

o ye

ars

of

grad

uatio

n fo

r 20

05-2

008

grad

uate

s an

d w

ithin

one

yea

r of

gra

duat

ion

for

2009

gra

duat

es.

28

Page 41: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Sch

ool D

istr

ict

Hig

h S

choo

l G

radu

ates

***

Gra

duat

es W

ho T

ook

Dev

elop

men

tal

Cou

rses

at M

inne

sota

Pu

blic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n In

stitu

tions

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in

Min

neso

ta P

ublic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n

Gra

duat

es

Who

Too

k at

L

east

One

C

ours

e

% o

f Gra

ds in

M

n P

ublic

H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Tab

le 5

Su

mm

ary

Rep

ort

By

Hig

h S

cho

ol

Enr

olle

d a

t Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

esor

the

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta

Cau

tion

sho

uld

be e

xerc

ised

in in

terp

retin

g th

is s

umm

ary

. T

he c

olle

ge r

eadi

nes

s of

gra

duat

es

wh

enro

lled

in M

inn

esot

a pu

blic

col

lege

s or

uni

vers

ities

may

not

be

a g

ood

indi

cato

r of

the

colle

ge

read

ines

s of

all

grad

uate

s fr

om th

at h

igh

scho

ol.

Col

umn

H in

dica

tes

the

perc

ent

age

of a

ll gr

adu

ates

from

a h

igh

scho

ol th

at to

ok d

evel

opm

enta

l/rem

edia

l cou

rses

at p

ubl

ic c

olle

ges

or

univ

ersi

ties

in M

inne

sota

. H

igh

scho

ols

with

fiv

e or

few

er g

radu

ates

in d

evel

opm

enta

l cou

rses

ar e

not l

iste

d in

divi

dual

ly, b

ut a

re in

clud

ed a

s a

grou

p in

the

tota

ls a

t the

bot

tom

of t

his

repo

rt.

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

(G)

(H)

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ates

Min

neso

ta D

urin

g F

isca

l Yea

rs 2

006

to 2

010

Tot

al N

umbe

r o

f Gra

duat

es

in C

lass

es

2005

- 2

009

% o

f Tot

al

Gra

duat

es

in

Cla

sses

20

05 -

200

9

% o

f T

otal

G

radu

ates

20

05 -

200

9

KIM

BA

LL P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

KIM

BA

LL S

EC

ON

DA

RY

168

385

5%12

%23

%30

8

KIN

GS

LAN

D P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

KIN

GS

LAN

D S

EN

IOR

HIG

H17

267

52%

20%

39%

329

KIT

TS

ON

CE

NT

RA

L S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TK

ITT

SO

N C

EN

TR

AL

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y8

938

57%

24%

43%

156

LAC

QU

I PA

RLE

VA

LLE

Y S

CH

OO

L D

IST

.LA

C Q

UI P

AR

LE V

ALL

EY

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y22

688

57%

22%

39%

397

LAC

RE

SC

EN

T-H

OK

AH

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

LAC

RE

SC

EN

T S

EN

IOR

HIG

H22

555

36%

9%24

%63

2

LAK

E C

ITY

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TLI

NC

OLN

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y29

812

25

7%23

%41

%52

4

LAK

E C

RY

ST

AL-

WE

LLC

OM

E M

EM

OR

IAL

LK C

RY

ST

AL-

WE

LLC

OM

E M

EM

OR

IAL

SE

C.

172

745

5%24

%43

%31

0

LAK

E O

F T

HE

WO

OD

S S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TLA

KE

OF

TH

E W

OO

DS

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y14

353

53%

20%

37%

270

LAK

E P

AR

K A

UD

UB

ON

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

LAK

E P

AR

K A

UD

UB

ON

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y10

839

51%

18%

36%

212

LAK

E S

UP

ER

IOR

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

.K

ELL

EY

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y10

940

56%

21%

37%

193

LAK

E S

UP

ER

IOR

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

.T

WO

HA

RB

OR

S S

EC

ON

DA

RY

217

804

7%17

%37

%46

3

LAK

EV

IEW

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

LAK

EV

IEW

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y13

145

62%

21%

34%

211

LAK

EV

ILLE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TLA

KE

VIL

LE A

RE

A L

EA

RN

ING

CE

NT

ER

23

191

2%10

%83

%19

5

LAK

EV

ILLE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TLA

KE

VIL

LE N

OR

TH

HIG

H1,

443

458

58%

18%

32%

2,5

08

LAK

EV

ILLE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TLA

KE

VIL

LE S

OU

TH

HIG

H58

217

75

1%15

%30

%1,

152

LAN

CA

ST

ER

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TLA

NC

AS

TE

R S

EC

ON

DA

RY

42

255

2%31

%60

%81

LAN

ES

BO

RO

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TLA

NE

SB

OR

O S

EC

ON

DA

RY

75

325

1%22

%43

%14

7

LAP

OR

TE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TLA

PO

RT

E S

EC

ON

DA

RY

53

265

3%26

%49

%10

0

LEC

EN

TE

R P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

LEC

EN

TE

R S

EC

ON

DA

RY

141

626

4%28

%44

%22

1

LER

OY

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TLE

RO

Y S

EC

ON

DA

RY

66

314

9%23

%47

%13

4

LES

TE

R P

RA

IRIE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

.LE

ST

ER

PR

AIR

IE S

EC

ON

DA

RY

111

396

5%23

%35

%17

2

** I

nd

ica

tes

tha

t th

ere

is n

o co

un

t o

f gra

du

ate

s fo

r th

is s

cho

ol.

In

mos

t ca

ses,

stu

dent

s at

tend

ed t

his

scho

ol a

nd r

epor

ted

to t

he c

olle

ge o

r un

iver

sity

that

the

y "g

radu

ated

" fr

om t

he s

choo

l. H

owev

er,

the

scho

ol d

oes

not

actu

ally

gra

nt t

he d

iplo

ma.

The

dip

lom

a is

typ

ical

ly g

rant

ed b

y an

othe

r hi

gh s

choo

l and

the

gra

duat

e is

the

refo

re r

epor

ted

in t

hat

high

sch

ool's

gra

duat

e co

unt.

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f M

inne

sota

Off

ice

of I

nstit

utio

nal R

esea

rch

and

Re

port

ing

***

The

num

bers

in c

olum

n D

are

und

uplic

ated

with

in M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

and

with

in th

e U

nive

rsity

of

Min

nes

ota.

F

or e

xam

ple,

if a

stu

dent

att

ende

d tw

o M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

in

stitu

tions

, tha

t st

ude

nt

is c

ount

ed o

ne t

ime

in t

he t

otal

for

thi

s ro

w.

Thi

s to

tal m

ay n

ot e

qual

the

tot

al p

rovi

ded

in o

ther

rep

orts

for

the

sam

e hi

gh s

choo

l whe

re t

he c

ount

is n

ot u

ndup

licat

ed.

* E

nrol

lmen

t w

ithin

tw

o ye

ars

of

grad

uatio

n fo

r 20

05-2

008

grad

uate

s an

d w

ithin

one

yea

r of

gra

duat

ion

for

2009

gra

duat

es.

29

Page 42: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Sch

ool D

istr

ict

Hig

h S

choo

l G

radu

ates

***

Gra

duat

es W

ho T

ook

Dev

elop

men

tal

Cou

rses

at M

inne

sota

Pu

blic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n In

stitu

tions

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in

Min

neso

ta P

ublic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n

Gra

duat

es

Who

Too

k at

L

east

One

C

ours

e

% o

f Gra

ds in

M

n P

ublic

H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Tab

le 5

Su

mm

ary

Rep

ort

By

Hig

h S

cho

ol

Enr

olle

d a

t Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

esor

the

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta

Cau

tion

sho

uld

be e

xerc

ised

in in

terp

retin

g th

is s

umm

ary

. T

he c

olle

ge r

eadi

nes

s of

gra

duat

es

wh

enro

lled

in M

inn

esot

a pu

blic

col

lege

s or

uni

vers

ities

may

not

be

a g

ood

indi

cato

r of

the

colle

ge

read

ines

s of

all

grad

uate

s fr

om th

at h

igh

scho

ol.

Col

umn

H in

dica

tes

the

perc

ent

age

of a

ll gr

adu

ates

from

a h

igh

scho

ol th

at to

ok d

evel

opm

enta

l/rem

edia

l cou

rses

at p

ubl

ic c

olle

ges

or

univ

ersi

ties

in M

inne

sota

. H

igh

scho

ols

with

fiv

e or

few

er g

radu

ates

in d

evel

opm

enta

l cou

rses

ar e

not l

iste

d in

divi

dual

ly, b

ut a

re in

clud

ed a

s a

grou

p in

the

tota

ls a

t the

bot

tom

of t

his

repo

rt.

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

(G)

(H)

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ates

Min

neso

ta D

urin

g F

isca

l Yea

rs 2

006

to 2

010

Tot

al N

umbe

r o

f Gra

duat

es

in C

lass

es

2005

- 2

009

% o

f Tot

al

Gra

duat

es

in

Cla

sses

20

05 -

200

9

% o

f T

otal

G

radu

ates

20

05 -

200

9

LES

UE

UR

-HE

ND

ER

SO

N S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TLE

SU

EU

R-H

EN

DE

RS

ON

MID

DLE

/HIG

H S

CH

L.22

696

50%

21%

42%

456

LEW

IST

ON

-ALT

UR

A P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

LEW

IST

ON

-ALT

UR

A S

EC

ON

DA

RY

166

825

7%28

%49

%29

2

LIG

HT

HO

US

E A

CA

DE

MY

OF

NA

TIO

NS

LIG

HT

HO

US

E A

CA

DE

MY

OF

NA

TIO

NS

61

556

2%56

%90

%99

LIN

CO

LN IN

TE

RN

AT

ION

AL

SC

HO

OL

LIN

CO

LN IN

TE

RN

AT

ION

AL

SC

HO

OL

132

117

69%

62%

89%

190

LIT

CH

FIE

LD P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

LIT

CH

FIE

LD S

EN

IOR

HIG

H39

015

35

9%23

%39

%65

7

LIT

TLE

FA

LLS

PU

BL

IC S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TLI

TT

LE F

ALL

S S

EN

IOR

HIG

H66

517

36

2%16

%26

%1,

066

LIT

TLE

FO

RK

-BIG

FA

LLS

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

LIT

TLE

FO

RK

-BIG

FA

LLS

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y7

428

59%

22%

38%

125

LON

G P

RA

IRIE

-GR

EY

EA

GLE

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TLO

NG

PR

AIR

IE-G

RE

Y S

EN

IOR

HIG

H25

281

53%

17%

32%

480

LUV

ER

NE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TLU

VE

RN

E S

EN

IOR

HIG

H18

569

42%

16%

37%

441

LYLE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TLY

LE S

EC

ON

DA

RY

48

215

5%24

%44

%87

M.A

.C.C

.R.A

.Y. S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TM

.A.C

.C.R

.A.Y

. SE

NIO

R H

IGH

200

946

7%31

%47

%29

9

MA

BE

L-C

AN

TO

N P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

MA

BE

L-C

AN

TO

N S

EC

ON

DA

RY

62

223

4%12

%35

%18

3

MA

DE

LIA

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TM

AD

ELI

A S

EC

ON

DA

RY

99

445

4%24

%44

%18

5

MA

HN

OM

EN

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TM

AH

NO

ME

N S

EC

ON

DA

RY

102

485

3%25

%47

%19

4

MA

HT

OM

ED

I PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TM

AH

TO

ME

DI

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

615

214

49%

17%

35%

1,2

67

MA

IN S

TR

EE

T S

CH

OO

L P

ER

FO

RM

ING

AR

TS

MA

IN S

TR

EE

T S

CH

OO

L P

ER

FO

RM

ING

AR

TS

70

255

0%18

%36

%13

9

MA

NK

AT

O P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

CE

NT

RA

L H

IGH

AR

EA

LE

AR

NIN

G C

EN

TE

R5

228

41%

22%

54%

126

MA

NK

AT

O P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

MA

NK

AT

O E

AS

T S

EN

IOR

HIG

H72

725

77

0%25

%35

%1,

041

MA

NK

AT

O P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

MA

NK

AT

O W

ES

T S

EN

IOR

HIG

H87

531

86

7%24

%36

%1,

298

MA

PLE

LA

KE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TM

AP

LE

LA

KE

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y21

370

61%

20%

33%

349

MA

PLE

RIV

ER

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

MA

PL

E R

IVE

R S

EN

IOR

HIG

H27

687

56%

18%

32%

491

** I

nd

ica

tes

tha

t th

ere

is n

o co

un

t o

f gra

du

ate

s fo

r th

is s

cho

ol.

In

mos

t ca

ses,

stu

dent

s at

tend

ed t

his

scho

ol a

nd r

epor

ted

to t

he c

olle

ge o

r un

iver

sity

that

the

y "g

radu

ated

" fr

om t

he s

choo

l. H

owev

er,

the

scho

ol d

oes

not

actu

ally

gra

nt t

he d

iplo

ma.

The

dip

lom

a is

typ

ical

ly g

rant

ed b

y an

othe

r hi

gh s

choo

l and

the

gra

duat

e is

the

refo

re r

epor

ted

in t

hat

high

sch

ool's

gra

duat

e co

unt.

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f M

inne

sota

Off

ice

of I

nstit

utio

nal R

esea

rch

and

Re

port

ing

***

The

num

bers

in c

olum

n D

are

und

uplic

ated

with

in M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

and

with

in th

e U

nive

rsity

of

Min

nes

ota.

F

or e

xam

ple,

if a

stu

dent

att

ende

d tw

o M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

in

stitu

tions

, tha

t st

ude

nt

is c

ount

ed o

ne t

ime

in t

he t

otal

for

thi

s ro

w.

Thi

s to

tal m

ay n

ot e

qual

the

tot

al p

rovi

ded

in o

ther

rep

orts

for

the

sam

e hi

gh s

choo

l whe

re t

he c

ount

is n

ot u

ndup

licat

ed.

* E

nrol

lmen

t w

ithin

tw

o ye

ars

of

grad

uatio

n fo

r 20

05-2

008

grad

uate

s an

d w

ithin

one

yea

r of

gra

duat

ion

for

2009

gra

duat

es.

30

Page 43: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Sch

ool D

istr

ict

Hig

h S

choo

l G

radu

ates

***

Gra

duat

es W

ho T

ook

Dev

elop

men

tal

Cou

rses

at M

inne

sota

Pu

blic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n In

stitu

tions

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in

Min

neso

ta P

ublic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n

Gra

duat

es

Who

Too

k at

L

east

One

C

ours

e

% o

f Gra

ds in

M

n P

ublic

H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Tab

le 5

Su

mm

ary

Rep

ort

By

Hig

h S

cho

ol

Enr

olle

d a

t Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

esor

the

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta

Cau

tion

sho

uld

be e

xerc

ised

in in

terp

retin

g th

is s

umm

ary

. T

he c

olle

ge r

eadi

nes

s of

gra

duat

es

wh

enro

lled

in M

inn

esot

a pu

blic

col

lege

s or

uni

vers

ities

may

not

be

a g

ood

indi

cato

r of

the

colle

ge

read

ines

s of

all

grad

uate

s fr

om th

at h

igh

scho

ol.

Col

umn

H in

dica

tes

the

perc

ent

age

of a

ll gr

adu

ates

from

a h

igh

scho

ol th

at to

ok d

evel

opm

enta

l/rem

edia

l cou

rses

at p

ubl

ic c

olle

ges

or

univ

ersi

ties

in M

inne

sota

. H

igh

scho

ols

with

fiv

e or

few

er g

radu

ates

in d

evel

opm

enta

l cou

rses

ar e

not l

iste

d in

divi

dual

ly, b

ut a

re in

clud

ed a

s a

grou

p in

the

tota

ls a

t the

bot

tom

of t

his

repo

rt.

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

(G)

(H)

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ates

Min

neso

ta D

urin

g F

isca

l Yea

rs 2

006

to 2

010

Tot

al N

umbe

r o

f Gra

duat

es

in C

lass

es

2005

- 2

009

% o

f Tot

al

Gra

duat

es

in

Cla

sses

20

05 -

200

9

% o

f T

otal

G

radu

ates

20

05 -

200

9

MA

RS

HA

LL C

OU

NT

Y C

EN

TR

AL

SC

HO

OLS

MA

RS

HA

LL C

OU

NT

Y C

EN

TR

AL

HIG

H9

334

66%

24%

37%

141

MA

RS

HA

LL P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

MA

RS

HA

LL H

IGH

SC

HO

OL

566

227

57%

23%

40%

990

MA

RT

IN C

OU

NT

Y W

ES

T S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TM

AR

TIN

CO

UN

TY

WE

ST

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

143

374

5%12

%26

%31

7

MC

GR

EG

OR

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TM

CG

RE

GO

R S

EC

ON

DA

RY

106

506

7%31

%47

%15

9

MC

LEO

D W

ES

T P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

MC

LEO

D W

ES

T S

EN

IOR

HIG

H9

645

67%

31%

47%

143

ME

DF

OR

D P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

ME

DF

OR

D S

EC

ON

DA

RY

100

475

1%24

%47

%19

6

ME

LRO

SE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TM

ELR

OS

E S

EC

ON

DA

RY

414

112

65%

18%

27%

634

ME

NA

HG

A P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

ME

NA

HG

A S

EC

ON

DA

RY

121

425

0%17

%35

%24

4

ME

SA

BI E

AS

T S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TM

ES

AB

I EA

ST

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y20

483

72%

29%

41%

283

MIL

AC

A P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

MIL

AC

A S

EC

ON

DA

RY

HIG

H35

911

05

3%16

%31

%68

2

MIN

NE

AP

OLI

S P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

BR

OA

DW

AY

AR

TS

& T

EC

HN

OLO

GY

69

545

2%41

%78

%13

2

MIN

NE

AP

OLI

S P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

ED

ISO

N S

EN

IOR

HIG

H41

926

06

5%40

%62

%64

5

MIN

NE

AP

OLI

S P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

HE

NR

Y S

EN

IOR

HIG

H52

729

15

6%31

%55

%93

9

MIN

NE

AP

OLI

S P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

LOR

ING

-NIC

OL

LET

HIG

H4

518

49%

20%

40%

92

MIN

NE

AP

OLI

S P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

ME

NLO

PA

RK

AC

AD

EM

Y2

111

37%

19%

52%

57

MIN

NE

AP

OLI

S P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

NO

RT

H S

EN

IOR

HIG

H33

821

36

2%39

%63

%54

8

MIN

NE

AP

OLI

S P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

RO

OS

EV

ELT

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

552

364

72%

47%

66%

767

MIN

NE

AP

OLI

S P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

SO

UT

H S

EN

IOR

HIG

H87

535

25

3%21

%40

%1,

654

MIN

NE

AP

OLI

S P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

SO

UT

HW

ES

T S

EN

IOR

HIG

H62

825

84

4%18

%41

%1,

414

MIN

NE

AP

OLI

S P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

VO

A S

ALT

47

384

5%36

%81

%10

5

MIN

NE

AP

OLI

S P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

WA

SH

BU

RN

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

577

331

79%

45%

57%

730

** I

nd

ica

tes

tha

t th

ere

is n

o co

un

t o

f gra

du

ate

s fo

r th

is s

cho

ol.

In

mos

t ca

ses,

stu

dent

s at

tend

ed t

his

scho

ol a

nd r

epor

ted

to t

he c

olle

ge o

r un

iver

sity

that

the

y "g

radu

ated

" fr

om t

he s

choo

l. H

owev

er,

the

scho

ol d

oes

not

actu

ally

gra

nt t

he d

iplo

ma.

The

dip

lom

a is

typ

ical

ly g

rant

ed b

y an

othe

r hi

gh s

choo

l and

the

gra

duat

e is

the

refo

re r

epor

ted

in t

hat

high

sch

ool's

gra

duat

e co

unt.

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f M

inne

sota

Off

ice

of I

nstit

utio

nal R

esea

rch

and

Re

port

ing

***

The

num

bers

in c

olum

n D

are

und

uplic

ated

with

in M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

and

with

in th

e U

nive

rsity

of

Min

nes

ota.

F

or e

xam

ple,

if a

stu

dent

att

ende

d tw

o M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

in

stitu

tions

, tha

t st

ude

nt

is c

ount

ed o

ne t

ime

in t

he t

otal

for

thi

s ro

w.

Thi

s to

tal m

ay n

ot e

qual

the

tot

al p

rovi

ded

in o

ther

rep

orts

for

the

sam

e hi

gh s

choo

l whe

re t

he c

ount

is n

ot u

ndup

licat

ed.

* E

nrol

lmen

t w

ithin

tw

o ye

ars

of

grad

uatio

n fo

r 20

05-2

008

grad

uate

s an

d w

ithin

one

yea

r of

gra

duat

ion

for

2009

gra

duat

es.

31

Page 44: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Sch

ool D

istr

ict

Hig

h S

choo

l G

radu

ates

***

Gra

duat

es W

ho T

ook

Dev

elop

men

tal

Cou

rses

at M

inne

sota

Pu

blic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n In

stitu

tions

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in

Min

neso

ta P

ublic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n

Gra

duat

es

Who

Too

k at

L

east

One

C

ours

e

% o

f Gra

ds in

M

n P

ublic

H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Tab

le 5

Su

mm

ary

Rep

ort

By

Hig

h S

cho

ol

Enr

olle

d a

t Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

esor

the

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta

Cau

tion

sho

uld

be e

xerc

ised

in in

terp

retin

g th

is s

umm

ary

. T

he c

olle

ge r

eadi

nes

s of

gra

duat

es

wh

enro

lled

in M

inn

esot

a pu

blic

col

lege

s or

uni

vers

ities

may

not

be

a g

ood

indi

cato

r of

the

colle

ge

read

ines

s of

all

grad

uate

s fr

om th

at h

igh

scho

ol.

Col

umn

H in

dica

tes

the

perc

ent

age

of a

ll gr

adu

ates

from

a h

igh

scho

ol th

at to

ok d

evel

opm

enta

l/rem

edia

l cou

rses

at p

ubl

ic c

olle

ges

or

univ

ersi

ties

in M

inne

sota

. H

igh

scho

ols

with

fiv

e or

few

er g

radu

ates

in d

evel

opm

enta

l cou

rses

ar e

not l

iste

d in

divi

dual

ly, b

ut a

re in

clud

ed a

s a

grou

p in

the

tota

ls a

t the

bot

tom

of t

his

repo

rt.

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

(G)

(H)

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ates

Min

neso

ta D

urin

g F

isca

l Yea

rs 2

006

to 2

010

Tot

al N

umbe

r o

f Gra

duat

es

in C

lass

es

2005

- 2

009

% o

f Tot

al

Gra

duat

es

in

Cla

sses

20

05 -

200

9

% o

f T

otal

G

radu

ates

20

05 -

200

9

MIN

NE

AP

OLI

S P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

WE

LLS

TO

NE

INT

ER

NA

TIO

NA

L H

IGH

79

637

5%60

%80

%10

5

MIN

NE

OT

A P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

MIN

NE

OT

A S

EC

ON

DA

RY

137

616

7%30

%45

%20

5

MIN

NE

SO

TA

BU

SIN

ES

S A

CA

DE

MY

CH

AR

TE

RM

INN

ES

OT

A B

US

INE

SS

AC

AD

EM

Y C

HA

RT

ER

59

375

2%33

%63

%11

3

MIN

NE

SO

TA

INT

ER

NS

HIP

CE

NT

ER

MIN

NE

SO

TA

INT

ER

NS

HIP

CE

NT

ER

CH

AR

TE

R S

146

131

38%

34%

90%

384

MIN

NE

SO

TA

NE

W C

OU

NT

RY

SC

HO

OL

MIN

NE

SO

TA

NE

W C

OU

NT

RY

SC

HO

OL

26

105

4%21

%38

%48

MIN

NE

SO

TA

ON

LIN

E H

IGH

SC

HO

OL

MIN

NE

SO

TA

ON

LIN

E H

IGH

SC

HO

OL

42

224

8%25

%52

%87

MIN

NE

SO

TA

TR

AN

SIT

ION

S C

HA

RT

ER

SC

HM

INN

ES

OT

A T

RA

NS

ITIO

NS

CH

AR

TE

R S

CH

OO

L22

616

32

7%20

%72

%82

3

MIN

NE

TO

NK

A P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

MIN

NE

TO

NK

A S

EN

IOR

HIG

H1,

234

337

42%

11%

27%

2,9

34

MIN

NE

WA

SK

A S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TM

INN

EW

AS

KA

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y33

070

59%

13%

21%

560

MO

NT

EV

IDE

O P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

MO

NT

EV

IDE

O S

EN

IOR

HIG

H28

311

25

6%22

%40

%50

1

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

-LO

NS

DA

LE S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TM

ON

TG

OM

ER

Y-L

ON

SD

ALE

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y21

493

56%

24%

43%

384

MO

NT

ICE

LLO

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TM

ON

TIC

ELL

O S

EN

IOR

HIG

H65

823

75

2%19

%36

%1,

254

MO

OR

HE

AD

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TM

OO

RH

EA

D H

IGH

SC

HO

OL

816

244

46%

14%

30%

1,7

87

MO

OS

E L

AK

E P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

MO

OS

E L

AK

E S

EC

ON

DA

RY

146

715

6%27

%49

%25

9

MO

RA

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TM

OR

A S

EC

ON

DA

RY

326

133

51%

21%

41%

634

MO

RR

IS P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

MO

RR

IS A

RE

A S

EC

ON

DA

RY

224

565

5%14

%25

%40

4

MO

UN

DS

VIE

W P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

IRO

ND

ALE

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

921

401

55%

24%

44%

1,6

64

MO

UN

DS

VIE

W P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

MO

UN

DS

VIE

W A

LC5

531

13%

7%56

%42

6

MO

UN

DS

VIE

W P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

MO

UN

DS

VIE

W S

EN

IOR

HIG

H99

531

54

7%15

%32

%2,

120

MO

UN

TA

IN I

RO

N-B

UH

L S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TM

OU

NT

AIN

IRO

N-B

UH

L S

EC

ON

DA

RY

134

537

2%28

%40

%18

7

MO

UN

TA

IN L

AK

E P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

SM

OU

NT

AIN

LA

KE

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y9

027

57%

17%

30%

157

** I

nd

ica

tes

tha

t th

ere

is n

o co

un

t o

f gra

du

ate

s fo

r th

is s

cho

ol.

In

mos

t ca

ses,

stu

dent

s at

tend

ed t

his

scho

ol a

nd r

epor

ted

to t

he c

olle

ge o

r un

iver

sity

that

the

y "g

radu

ated

" fr

om t

he s

choo

l. H

owev

er,

the

scho

ol d

oes

not

actu

ally

gra

nt t

he d

iplo

ma.

The

dip

lom

a is

typ

ical

ly g

rant

ed b

y an

othe

r hi

gh s

choo

l and

the

gra

duat

e is

the

refo

re r

epor

ted

in t

hat

high

sch

ool's

gra

duat

e co

unt.

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f M

inne

sota

Off

ice

of I

nstit

utio

nal R

esea

rch

and

Re

port

ing

***

The

num

bers

in c

olum

n D

are

und

uplic

ated

with

in M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

and

with

in th

e U

nive

rsity

of

Min

nes

ota.

F

or e

xam

ple,

if a

stu

dent

att

ende

d tw

o M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

in

stitu

tions

, tha

t st

ude

nt

is c

ount

ed o

ne t

ime

in t

he t

otal

for

thi

s ro

w.

Thi

s to

tal m

ay n

ot e

qual

the

tot

al p

rovi

ded

in o

ther

rep

orts

for

the

sam

e hi

gh s

choo

l whe

re t

he c

ount

is n

ot u

ndup

licat

ed.

* E

nrol

lmen

t w

ithin

tw

o ye

ars

of

grad

uatio

n fo

r 20

05-2

008

grad

uate

s an

d w

ithin

one

yea

r of

gra

duat

ion

for

2009

gra

duat

es.

32

Page 45: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Sch

ool D

istr

ict

Hig

h S

choo

l G

radu

ates

***

Gra

duat

es W

ho T

ook

Dev

elop

men

tal

Cou

rses

at M

inne

sota

Pu

blic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n In

stitu

tions

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in

Min

neso

ta P

ublic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n

Gra

duat

es

Who

Too

k at

L

east

One

C

ours

e

% o

f Gra

ds in

M

n P

ublic

H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Tab

le 5

Su

mm

ary

Rep

ort

By

Hig

h S

cho

ol

Enr

olle

d a

t Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

esor

the

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta

Cau

tion

sho

uld

be e

xerc

ised

in in

terp

retin

g th

is s

umm

ary

. T

he c

olle

ge r

eadi

nes

s of

gra

duat

es

wh

enro

lled

in M

inn

esot

a pu

blic

col

lege

s or

uni

vers

ities

may

not

be

a g

ood

indi

cato

r of

the

colle

ge

read

ines

s of

all

grad

uate

s fr

om th

at h

igh

scho

ol.

Col

umn

H in

dica

tes

the

perc

ent

age

of a

ll gr

adu

ates

from

a h

igh

scho

ol th

at to

ok d

evel

opm

enta

l/rem

edia

l cou

rses

at p

ubl

ic c

olle

ges

or

univ

ersi

ties

in M

inne

sota

. H

igh

scho

ols

with

fiv

e or

few

er g

radu

ates

in d

evel

opm

enta

l cou

rses

ar e

not l

iste

d in

divi

dual

ly, b

ut a

re in

clud

ed a

s a

grou

p in

the

tota

ls a

t the

bot

tom

of t

his

repo

rt.

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

(G)

(H)

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ates

Min

neso

ta D

urin

g F

isca

l Yea

rs 2

006

to 2

010

Tot

al N

umbe

r o

f Gra

duat

es

in C

lass

es

2005

- 2

009

% o

f Tot

al

Gra

duat

es

in

Cla

sses

20

05 -

200

9

% o

f T

otal

G

radu

ates

20

05 -

200

9

MU

RR

AY

CO

UN

TY

CE

NT

RA

L S

CH

OO

L D

IST

.M

UR

RA

Y C

OU

NT

Y C

EN

TR

AL

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y16

058

58%

21%

36%

276

N.E

. ME

TR

O IN

TE

RM

ED

IAT

E D

IST

. 91

6E

AS

T V

IEW

AC

AD

EM

Y8

853

30%

18%

60%

295

NA

SH

WA

UK

-KE

EW

AT

IN S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TN

AS

HW

AU

K S

EC

ON

DA

RY

146

656

4%29

%45

%22

8

NE

VIS

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TN

EV

IS S

EC

ON

DA

RY

102

405

2%21

%39

%19

5

NE

W C

EN

TU

RY

CH

AR

TE

R S

CH

OO

LN

EW

CE

NT

UR

Y C

HA

RT

ER

SC

HO

OL

51

205

5%22

%39

%93

NE

W H

EIG

HT

S S

CH

OO

L, IN

C.

NE

W H

EIG

HT

S S

CH

OO

L, IN

C.

22

132

3%14

%59

%95

NE

W L

ON

DO

N-S

PIC

ER

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

NE

W L

ON

DO

N-S

PIC

ER

SR

.44

316

26

9%25

%37

%63

8

NE

W P

RA

GU

E A

RE

A S

CH

OO

LSN

EW

PR

AG

UE

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

635

189

56%

17%

30%

1,1

25

NE

W U

LM P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

NE

W U

LM H

IGH

SC

HO

OL

579

215

62%

23%

37%

938

NE

W Y

OR

K M

ILLS

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

.N

EW

YO

RK

MIL

LS S

EC

ON

DA

RY

175

556

3%20

%31

%27

9

NIC

OLL

ET

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TN

ICO

LLE

T S

EC

ON

DA

RY

104

336

9%22

%32

%15

1

NO

RM

AN

CO

UN

TY

EA

ST

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

NO

RM

AN

CO

UN

TY

EA

ST

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y6

620

49%

15%

30%

136

NO

RM

AN

CO

UN

TY

WE

ST

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

NO

RM

AN

CO

UN

TY

WE

ST

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y5

627

41%

20%

48%

137

NO

RT

H B

RA

NC

H P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OLS

NO

RT

H B

RA

NC

H S

EN

IOR

HIG

H65

429

15

5%24

%44

%1,

200

NO

RT

H S

T P

AU

L-M

AP

LEW

OO

D S

CH

OO

L D

IST

NO

RT

H S

EN

IOR

HIG

H1,

216

607

59%

30%

50%

2,0

50

NO

RT

H S

T P

AU

L-M

AP

LEW

OO

D S

CH

OO

L D

IST

TA

RT

AN

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

1,07

851

46

1%29

%48

%1,

761

NO

RT

HF

IELD

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TN

OR

TH

FIE

LD S

EN

IOR

HIG

H56

320

14

0%14

%36

%1,

392

NO

RT

HLA

ND

CO

MM

UN

ITY

SC

HO

OLS

NO

RT

HLA

ND

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y9

745

51%

24%

46%

189

NO

RT

HW

ES

T P

AS

SA

GE

HIG

H S

CH

OO

LN

OR

TH

WE

ST

PA

SS

AG

E H

IGH

SC

HO

OL

30

182

0%12

%60

%14

8

NO

RW

OO

D P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

CE

NT

RA

L S

EN

IOR

HIG

H23

896

60%

24%

40%

400

NR

HE

G S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TN

RH

EG

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y20

169

54%

18%

34%

373

** I

nd

ica

tes

tha

t th

ere

is n

o co

un

t o

f gra

du

ate

s fo

r th

is s

cho

ol.

In

mos

t ca

ses,

stu

dent

s at

tend

ed t

his

scho

ol a

nd r

epor

ted

to t

he c

olle

ge o

r un

iver

sity

that

the

y "g

radu

ated

" fr

om t

he s

choo

l. H

owev

er,

the

scho

ol d

oes

not

actu

ally

gra

nt t

he d

iplo

ma.

The

dip

lom

a is

typ

ical

ly g

rant

ed b

y an

othe

r hi

gh s

choo

l and

the

gra

duat

e is

the

refo

re r

epor

ted

in t

hat

high

sch

ool's

gra

duat

e co

unt.

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f M

inne

sota

Off

ice

of I

nstit

utio

nal R

esea

rch

and

Re

port

ing

***

The

num

bers

in c

olum

n D

are

und

uplic

ated

with

in M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

and

with

in th

e U

nive

rsity

of

Min

nes

ota.

F

or e

xam

ple,

if a

stu

dent

att

ende

d tw

o M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

in

stitu

tions

, tha

t st

ude

nt

is c

ount

ed o

ne t

ime

in t

he t

otal

for

thi

s ro

w.

Thi

s to

tal m

ay n

ot e

qual

the

tot

al p

rovi

ded

in o

ther

rep

orts

for

the

sam

e hi

gh s

choo

l whe

re t

he c

ount

is n

ot u

ndup

licat

ed.

* E

nrol

lmen

t w

ithin

tw

o ye

ars

of

grad

uatio

n fo

r 20

05-2

008

grad

uate

s an

d w

ithin

one

yea

r of

gra

duat

ion

for

2009

gra

duat

es.

33

Page 46: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Sch

ool D

istr

ict

Hig

h S

choo

l G

radu

ates

***

Gra

duat

es W

ho T

ook

Dev

elop

men

tal

Cou

rses

at M

inne

sota

Pu

blic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n In

stitu

tions

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in

Min

neso

ta P

ublic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n

Gra

duat

es

Who

Too

k at

L

east

One

C

ours

e

% o

f Gra

ds in

M

n P

ublic

H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Tab

le 5

Su

mm

ary

Rep

ort

By

Hig

h S

cho

ol

Enr

olle

d a

t Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

esor

the

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta

Cau

tion

sho

uld

be e

xerc

ised

in in

terp

retin

g th

is s

umm

ary

. T

he c

olle

ge r

eadi

nes

s of

gra

duat

es

wh

enro

lled

in M

inn

esot

a pu

blic

col

lege

s or

uni

vers

ities

may

not

be

a g

ood

indi

cato

r of

the

colle

ge

read

ines

s of

all

grad

uate

s fr

om th

at h

igh

scho

ol.

Col

umn

H in

dica

tes

the

perc

ent

age

of a

ll gr

adu

ates

from

a h

igh

scho

ol th

at to

ok d

evel

opm

enta

l/rem

edia

l cou

rses

at p

ubl

ic c

olle

ges

or

univ

ersi

ties

in M

inne

sota

. H

igh

scho

ols

with

fiv

e or

few

er g

radu

ates

in d

evel

opm

enta

l cou

rses

ar e

not l

iste

d in

divi

dual

ly, b

ut a

re in

clud

ed a

s a

grou

p in

the

tota

ls a

t the

bot

tom

of t

his

repo

rt.

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

(G)

(H)

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ates

Min

neso

ta D

urin

g F

isca

l Yea

rs 2

006

to 2

010

Tot

al N

umbe

r o

f Gra

duat

es

in C

lass

es

2005

- 2

009

% o

f Tot

al

Gra

duat

es

in

Cla

sses

20

05 -

200

9

% o

f T

otal

G

radu

ates

20

05 -

200

9

OG

ILV

IE P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

OG

ILV

IE S

EC

ON

DA

RY

96

413

8%16

%43

%25

4

OK

LEE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TR

ED

LA

KE

CO

UN

TY

CE

NT

RA

L H

IGH

SC

HO

OL

62

224

6%16

%35

%13

5

ON

AM

IA P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

ON

AM

IA S

EC

ON

DA

RY

138

465

8%19

%33

%23

7

OR

ON

O P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

OR

ON

O S

EN

IOR

HIG

H32

810

33

5%11

%31

%94

2

OR

TO

NV

ILLE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

LSO

RT

ON

VIL

LE S

EC

ON

DA

RY

138

524

7%18

%38

%29

6

OS

AK

IS P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

OS

AK

IS S

EC

ON

DA

RY

167

405

9%14

%24

%28

3

OS

SE

O P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

MA

PL

E G

RO

VE

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

1,64

053

66

1%20

%33

%2,

685

OS

SE

O P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

OS

SE

O A

RE

A L

EA

RN

ING

CE

NT

ER

79

5772

%**

OS

SE

O P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

OS

SE

O S

EN

IOR

HIG

H1,

437

682

65%

31%

47%

2,2

03

OS

SE

O P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

PA

RK

CE

NT

ER

IB W

OR

LD S

CH

OO

L1,

242

654

68%

36%

53%

1,8

29

OW

AT

ON

NA

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TO

WA

TO

NN

A S

EN

IOR

HIG

H95

738

75

3%21

%40

%1,

802

PA

CT

CH

AR

TE

R S

CH

OO

LP

AC

T C

HA

RT

ER

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y9

542

51%

23%

44%

186

PA

LAD

IN A

CA

DE

MY

PA

LAD

IN A

CA

DE

MY

59

312

5%13

%53

%23

7

PA

RK

RA

PID

S P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

PA

RK

RA

PID

S S

EN

IOR

HIG

H31

111

15

3%19

%36

%58

7

PA

RK

ER

S P

RA

IRIE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

.P

AR

KE

RS

PR

AIR

IE S

EC

ON

DA

RY

151

436

3%18

%28

%23

9

PA

YN

ES

VIL

LE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TP

AY

NE

SV

ILLE

AR

EA

HIG

H S

CH

OO

L24

074

54%

17%

31%

443

PE

LIC

AN

RA

PID

S P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

PE

LIC

AN

RA

PID

S S

EC

ON

DA

RY

235

102

51%

22%

43%

462

PE

QU

OT

LA

KE

S P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OLS

PE

QU

OT

LA

KE

S S

EN

IOR

HIG

H30

896

59%

18%

31%

525

PE

RH

AM

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TP

ER

HA

M S

EN

IOR

HIG

H41

613

16

3%20

%31

%65

9

PIE

RZ

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TH

EA

LY

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y24

753

60%

13%

21%

414

PIL

LAG

ER

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TP

ILLA

GE

R S

EC

ON

DA

RY

139

475

4%18

%34

%25

6

** I

nd

ica

tes

tha

t th

ere

is n

o co

un

t o

f gra

du

ate

s fo

r th

is s

cho

ol.

In

mos

t ca

ses,

stu

dent

s at

tend

ed t

his

scho

ol a

nd r

epor

ted

to t

he c

olle

ge o

r un

iver

sity

that

the

y "g

radu

ated

" fr

om t

he s

choo

l. H

owev

er,

the

scho

ol d

oes

not

actu

ally

gra

nt t

he d

iplo

ma.

The

dip

lom

a is

typ

ical

ly g

rant

ed b

y an

othe

r hi

gh s

choo

l and

the

gra

duat

e is

the

refo

re r

epor

ted

in t

hat

high

sch

ool's

gra

duat

e co

unt.

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f M

inne

sota

Off

ice

of I

nstit

utio

nal R

esea

rch

and

Re

port

ing

***

The

num

bers

in c

olum

n D

are

und

uplic

ated

with

in M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

and

with

in th

e U

nive

rsity

of

Min

nes

ota.

F

or e

xam

ple,

if a

stu

dent

att

ende

d tw

o M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

in

stitu

tions

, tha

t st

ude

nt

is c

ount

ed o

ne t

ime

in t

he t

otal

for

thi

s ro

w.

Thi

s to

tal m

ay n

ot e

qual

the

tot

al p

rovi

ded

in o

ther

rep

orts

for

the

sam

e hi

gh s

choo

l whe

re t

he c

ount

is n

ot u

ndup

licat

ed.

* E

nrol

lmen

t w

ithin

tw

o ye

ars

of

grad

uatio

n fo

r 20

05-2

008

grad

uate

s an

d w

ithin

one

yea

r of

gra

duat

ion

for

2009

gra

duat

es.

34

Page 47: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Sch

ool D

istr

ict

Hig

h S

choo

l G

radu

ates

***

Gra

duat

es W

ho T

ook

Dev

elop

men

tal

Cou

rses

at M

inne

sota

Pu

blic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n In

stitu

tions

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in

Min

neso

ta P

ublic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n

Gra

duat

es

Who

Too

k at

L

east

One

C

ours

e

% o

f Gra

ds in

M

n P

ublic

H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Tab

le 5

Su

mm

ary

Rep

ort

By

Hig

h S

cho

ol

Enr

olle

d a

t Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

esor

the

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta

Cau

tion

sho

uld

be e

xerc

ised

in in

terp

retin

g th

is s

umm

ary

. T

he c

olle

ge r

eadi

nes

s of

gra

duat

es

wh

enro

lled

in M

inn

esot

a pu

blic

col

lege

s or

uni

vers

ities

may

not

be

a g

ood

indi

cato

r of

the

colle

ge

read

ines

s of

all

grad

uate

s fr

om th

at h

igh

scho

ol.

Col

umn

H in

dica

tes

the

perc

ent

age

of a

ll gr

adu

ates

from

a h

igh

scho

ol th

at to

ok d

evel

opm

enta

l/rem

edia

l cou

rses

at p

ubl

ic c

olle

ges

or

univ

ersi

ties

in M

inne

sota

. H

igh

scho

ols

with

fiv

e or

few

er g

radu

ates

in d

evel

opm

enta

l cou

rses

ar e

not l

iste

d in

divi

dual

ly, b

ut a

re in

clud

ed a

s a

grou

p in

the

tota

ls a

t the

bot

tom

of t

his

repo

rt.

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

(G)

(H)

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ates

Min

neso

ta D

urin

g F

isca

l Yea

rs 2

006

to 2

010

Tot

al N

umbe

r o

f Gra

duat

es

in C

lass

es

2005

- 2

009

% o

f Tot

al

Gra

duat

es

in

Cla

sses

20

05 -

200

9

% o

f T

otal

G

radu

ates

20

05 -

200

9

PIN

E C

ITY

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TP

INE

CIT

Y S

EC

ON

DA

RY

332

148

57%

25%

45%

584

PIN

E IS

LAN

D P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

PIN

E IS

LAN

D S

EC

ON

DA

RY

244

865

7%20

%35

%42

9

PIN

E R

IVE

R-B

AC

KU

S S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TP

INE

RIV

ER

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y20

262

60%

19%

31%

335

PIP

ES

TO

NE

AR

EA

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

PIP

ES

TO

NE

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

177

644

2%15

%36

%42

3

PLA

INV

IEW

-ELG

IN-M

ILLV

ILLE

PLA

INV

IEW

-ELG

IN-M

ILLV

ILLE

HIG

H36

916

16

7%29

%44

%55

3

PR

INC

ET

ON

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TP

RIN

CE

TO

N S

EN

IOR

HIG

H61

325

55

3%22

%42

%1,

166

PR

IOR

LA

KE

-SA

VA

GE

AR

EA

SC

HO

OLS

PR

IOR

LA

KE

HIG

H S

CH

OO

L1,

076

339

58%

18%

32%

1,8

62

PR

OC

TO

R P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

PR

OC

TO

R S

EN

IOR

HIG

H33

914

15

2%22

%42

%64

8

RA

ND

OLP

H P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

RA

ND

OLP

H S

EC

ON

DA

RY

95

375

3%21

%39

%17

8

RE

D L

AK

E F

ALL

S P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

LAF

AY

ET

TE

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y12

553

71%

30%

42%

176

RE

D L

AK

E P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

RE

D L

AK

E S

EN

IOR

HIG

H6

146

46%

35%

75%

133

RE

D R

OC

K C

EN

TR

AL

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

RE

D R

OC

K C

EN

TR

AL

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y11

238

54%

18%

34%

208

RE

D W

ING

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TR

ED

WIN

G S

EN

IOR

HIG

H52

525

95

3%26

%49

%98

9

RE

DW

OO

D A

RE

A S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TR

ED

WO

OD

VA

LLE

Y S

EN

IOR

HIG

H27

297

53%

19%

36%

512

RE

NV

ILL

E C

OU

NT

Y W

ES

T S

CH

OO

L D

IST

.R

EN

VIL

LE C

OU

NT

Y W

ES

T S

EN

IOR

HIG

H15

665

58%

24%

42%

269

RIC

HF

IELD

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TR

ICH

FIE

LD S

EN

IOR

HIG

H78

738

56

5%32

%49

%1,

214

RIV

ER

BE

ND

ED

UC

AT

ION

DIS

TR

ICT

RIV

ER

BE

ND

ALC

24

141

6%9%

58%

151

RO

BB

INS

DA

LE P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

RO

BB

INS

DA

LE A

RM

ST

RO

NG

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

1,27

054

25

8%25

%43

%2,

206

RO

BB

INS

DA

LE P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

RO

BB

INS

DA

LE C

OO

PE

R S

EN

IOR

HIG

H93

044

56

0%29

%48

%1,

540

RO

CH

ES

TE

R O

FF

-CA

MP

US

CH

AR

TE

R H

IGH

RO

CH

ES

TE

R O

FF

-CA

MP

US

CH

AR

TE

R H

IGH

38

223

2%18

%58

%12

0

RO

CH

ES

TE

R P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

CE

NT

UR

Y S

EN

IOR

HIG

H1,

153

403

59%

20%

35%

1,9

68

** I

nd

ica

tes

tha

t th

ere

is n

o co

un

t o

f gra

du

ate

s fo

r th

is s

cho

ol.

In

mos

t ca

ses,

stu

dent

s at

tend

ed t

his

scho

ol a

nd r

epor

ted

to t

he c

olle

ge o

r un

iver

sity

that

the

y "g

radu

ated

" fr

om t

he s

choo

l. H

owev

er,

the

scho

ol d

oes

not

actu

ally

gra

nt t

he d

iplo

ma.

The

dip

lom

a is

typ

ical

ly g

rant

ed b

y an

othe

r hi

gh s

choo

l and

the

gra

duat

e is

the

refo

re r

epor

ted

in t

hat

high

sch

ool's

gra

duat

e co

unt.

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f M

inne

sota

Off

ice

of I

nstit

utio

nal R

esea

rch

and

Re

port

ing

***

The

num

bers

in c

olum

n D

are

und

uplic

ated

with

in M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

and

with

in th

e U

nive

rsity

of

Min

nes

ota.

F

or e

xam

ple,

if a

stu

dent

att

ende

d tw

o M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

in

stitu

tions

, tha

t st

ude

nt

is c

ount

ed o

ne t

ime

in t

he t

otal

for

thi

s ro

w.

Thi

s to

tal m

ay n

ot e

qual

the

tot

al p

rovi

ded

in o

ther

rep

orts

for

the

sam

e hi

gh s

choo

l whe

re t

he c

ount

is n

ot u

ndup

licat

ed.

* E

nrol

lmen

t w

ithin

tw

o ye

ars

of

grad

uatio

n fo

r 20

05-2

008

grad

uate

s an

d w

ithin

one

yea

r of

gra

duat

ion

for

2009

gra

duat

es.

35

Page 48: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Sch

ool D

istr

ict

Hig

h S

choo

l G

radu

ates

***

Gra

duat

es W

ho T

ook

Dev

elop

men

tal

Cou

rses

at M

inne

sota

Pu

blic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n In

stitu

tions

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in

Min

neso

ta P

ublic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n

Gra

duat

es

Who

Too

k at

L

east

One

C

ours

e

% o

f Gra

ds in

M

n P

ublic

H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Tab

le 5

Su

mm

ary

Rep

ort

By

Hig

h S

cho

ol

Enr

olle

d a

t Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

esor

the

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta

Cau

tion

sho

uld

be e

xerc

ised

in in

terp

retin

g th

is s

umm

ary

. T

he c

olle

ge r

eadi

nes

s of

gra

duat

es

wh

enro

lled

in M

inn

esot

a pu

blic

col

lege

s or

uni

vers

ities

may

not

be

a g

ood

indi

cato

r of

the

colle

ge

read

ines

s of

all

grad

uate

s fr

om th

at h

igh

scho

ol.

Col

umn

H in

dica

tes

the

perc

ent

age

of a

ll gr

adu

ates

from

a h

igh

scho

ol th

at to

ok d

evel

opm

enta

l/rem

edia

l cou

rses

at p

ubl

ic c

olle

ges

or

univ

ersi

ties

in M

inne

sota

. H

igh

scho

ols

with

fiv

e or

few

er g

radu

ates

in d

evel

opm

enta

l cou

rses

ar e

not l

iste

d in

divi

dual

ly, b

ut a

re in

clud

ed a

s a

grou

p in

the

tota

ls a

t the

bot

tom

of t

his

repo

rt.

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

(G)

(H)

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ates

Min

neso

ta D

urin

g F

isca

l Yea

rs 2

006

to 2

010

Tot

al N

umbe

r o

f Gra

duat

es

in C

lass

es

2005

- 2

009

% o

f Tot

al

Gra

duat

es

in

Cla

sses

20

05 -

200

9

% o

f T

otal

G

radu

ates

20

05 -

200

9

RO

CH

ES

TE

R P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

JOH

N M

AR

SH

AL

L S

EN

IOR

HIG

H1,

046

485

65%

30%

46%

1,6

11

RO

CH

ES

TE

R P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

MA

YO

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

1,04

636

56

0%21

%35

%1,

744

RO

CH

ES

TE

R P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

RO

CH

ES

TE

R A

RE

A L

EA

RN

ING

CE

NT

ER

33

229%

6%67

%38

1

RO

CK

FO

RD

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TR

OC

KF

OR

D S

EC

ON

DA

RY

310

122

51%

20%

39%

612

RO

CO

RI P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

RO

CO

RI S

EN

IOR

HIG

H59

315

56

2%16

%26

%95

0

RO

SE

AU

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TR

OS

EA

U S

EC

ON

DA

RY

302

985

6%18

%32

%54

0

RO

SE

MO

UN

T-A

PP

LE V

ALL

EY

-EA

GA

NA

PP

LE V

ALL

EY

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

1,31

345

45

6%19

%35

%2,

359

RO

SE

MO

UN

T-A

PP

LE V

ALL

EY

-EA

GA

NE

AG

AN

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

1,26

243

05

0%17

%34

%2,

546

RO

SE

MO

UN

T-A

PP

LE V

ALL

EY

-EA

GA

NE

AS

TV

IEW

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

1,23

338

04

8%15

%31

%2,

564

RO

SE

MO

UN

T-A

PP

LE V

ALL

EY

-EA

GA

NR

OS

EM

OU

NT

AR

EA

LE

AR

NIN

G C

EN

TE

R2

59

6%2%

36%

433

RO

SE

MO

UN

T-A

PP

LE V

ALL

EY

-EA

GA

NR

OS

EM

OU

NT

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

1,19

846

55

7%22

%39

%2,

092

RO

SE

MO

UN

T-A

PP

LE V

ALL

EY

-EA

GA

NS

CH

OO

L O

F E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L S

TU

DIE

S23

480

34%

**

RO

SE

VIL

LE P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

RO

SE

VIL

LE A

RE

A S

EN

IOR

HIG

H1,

246

509

53%

22%

41%

2,3

53

RO

TH

SA

Y P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

RO

TH

SA

Y S

EC

ON

DA

RY

37

144

5%17

%38

%83

RO

UN

D L

AK

E P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

RO

UN

D L

AK

E S

EC

ON

DA

RY

81

256

5%20

%31

%12

5

RO

YA

LTO

N P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

RO

YA

LTO

N S

EC

ON

DA

RY

153

505

4%18

%33

%28

2

RT

R P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

SR

TR

HIG

H S

CH

OO

L11

532

52%

14%

28%

223

RU

SH

CIT

Y P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

RU

SH

CIT

Y S

EC

ON

DA

RY

186

965

3%27

%52

%35

3

RU

SH

FO

RD

-PE

TE

RS

ON

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

LS

RU

SH

FO

RD

-PE

TE

RS

ON

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

162

666

1%25

%41

%26

6

SA

GE

AC

AD

EM

Y C

HA

RT

ER

SC

HO

OL

SA

GE

AC

AD

EM

Y C

HA

RT

ER

SC

HO

OL

24

123

2%16

%50

%76

SA

RT

ELL

-ST

. ST

EP

HE

N S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TS

AR

TE

LL S

EN

IOR

HIG

H57

514

65

8%15

%25

%1,

000

** I

nd

ica

tes

tha

t th

ere

is n

o co

un

t o

f gra

du

ate

s fo

r th

is s

cho

ol.

In

mos

t ca

ses,

stu

dent

s at

tend

ed t

his

scho

ol a

nd r

epor

ted

to t

he c

olle

ge o

r un

iver

sity

that

the

y "g

radu

ated

" fr

om t

he s

choo

l. H

owev

er,

the

scho

ol d

oes

not

actu

ally

gra

nt t

he d

iplo

ma.

The

dip

lom

a is

typ

ical

ly g

rant

ed b

y an

othe

r hi

gh s

choo

l and

the

gra

duat

e is

the

refo

re r

epor

ted

in t

hat

high

sch

ool's

gra

duat

e co

unt.

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f M

inne

sota

Off

ice

of I

nstit

utio

nal R

esea

rch

and

Re

port

ing

***

The

num

bers

in c

olum

n D

are

und

uplic

ated

with

in M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

and

with

in th

e U

nive

rsity

of

Min

nes

ota.

F

or e

xam

ple,

if a

stu

dent

att

ende

d tw

o M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

in

stitu

tions

, tha

t st

ude

nt

is c

ount

ed o

ne t

ime

in t

he t

otal

for

thi

s ro

w.

Thi

s to

tal m

ay n

ot e

qual

the

tot

al p

rovi

ded

in o

ther

rep

orts

for

the

sam

e hi

gh s

choo

l whe

re t

he c

ount

is n

ot u

ndup

licat

ed.

* E

nrol

lmen

t w

ithin

tw

o ye

ars

of

grad

uatio

n fo

r 20

05-2

008

grad

uate

s an

d w

ithin

one

yea

r of

gra

duat

ion

for

2009

gra

duat

es.

36

Page 49: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Sch

ool D

istr

ict

Hig

h S

choo

l G

radu

ates

***

Gra

duat

es W

ho T

ook

Dev

elop

men

tal

Cou

rses

at M

inne

sota

Pu

blic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n In

stitu

tions

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in

Min

neso

ta P

ublic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n

Gra

duat

es

Who

Too

k at

L

east

One

C

ours

e

% o

f Gra

ds in

M

n P

ublic

H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Tab

le 5

Su

mm

ary

Rep

ort

By

Hig

h S

cho

ol

Enr

olle

d a

t Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

esor

the

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta

Cau

tion

sho

uld

be e

xerc

ised

in in

terp

retin

g th

is s

umm

ary

. T

he c

olle

ge r

eadi

nes

s of

gra

duat

es

wh

enro

lled

in M

inn

esot

a pu

blic

col

lege

s or

uni

vers

ities

may

not

be

a g

ood

indi

cato

r of

the

colle

ge

read

ines

s of

all

grad

uate

s fr

om th

at h

igh

scho

ol.

Col

umn

H in

dica

tes

the

perc

ent

age

of a

ll gr

adu

ates

from

a h

igh

scho

ol th

at to

ok d

evel

opm

enta

l/rem

edia

l cou

rses

at p

ubl

ic c

olle

ges

or

univ

ersi

ties

in M

inne

sota

. H

igh

scho

ols

with

fiv

e or

few

er g

radu

ates

in d

evel

opm

enta

l cou

rses

ar e

not l

iste

d in

divi

dual

ly, b

ut a

re in

clud

ed a

s a

grou

p in

the

tota

ls a

t the

bot

tom

of t

his

repo

rt.

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

(G)

(H)

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ates

Min

neso

ta D

urin

g F

isca

l Yea

rs 2

006

to 2

010

Tot

al N

umbe

r o

f Gra

duat

es

in C

lass

es

2005

- 2

009

% o

f Tot

al

Gra

duat

es

in

Cla

sses

20

05 -

200

9

% o

f T

otal

G

radu

ates

20

05 -

200

9

SA

UK

CE

NT

RE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TS

AU

K C

EN

TR

E S

EC

ON

DA

RY

308

756

0%15

%24

%51

3

SA

UK

RA

PID

S P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

SA

UK

RA

PID

S-R

ICE

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

836

274

66%

22%

33%

1,2

58

SE

BE

KA

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TS

EB

EK

A S

EC

ON

DA

RY

120

375

8%18

%31

%20

7

SH

AK

OP

EE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TS

HA

KO

PE

E S

EN

IOR

HIG

H84

233

16

4%25

%39

%1,

321

SIB

LEY

EA

ST

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

SIB

LEY

EA

ST

-AR

LIN

GT

ON

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

284

856

2%18

%30

%46

1

SLE

EP

Y E

YE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TS

LEE

PY

EY

E S

EC

.14

462

60%

26%

43%

242

SO

BR

IET

Y H

IGH

SO

BR

IET

Y H

IGH

WE

ST

CA

MP

US

52

308

0%46

%58

%65

SO

UT

H K

OO

CH

ICH

ING

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

IND

US

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y3

412

51%

18%

35%

67

SO

UT

H K

OO

CH

ICH

ING

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

NO

RT

HO

ME

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y4

921

64%

28%

43%

76

SO

UT

H S

T. P

AU

L P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

SO

UT

H S

T. P

AU

L S

EC

ON

DA

RY

581

246

56%

24%

42%

1,0

31

SO

UT

H W

AS

HIN

GT

ON

CO

UN

TY

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TP

AR

K S

EN

IOR

HIG

H1,

283

526

52%

21%

41%

2,4

84

SO

UT

H W

AS

HIN

GT

ON

CO

UN

TY

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TS

O. W

AS

HIN

GT

ON

ALT

LE

AR

NIN

G C

NT

R2

06

12%

4%30

%16

5

SO

UT

H W

AS

HIN

GT

ON

CO

UN

TY

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TW

OO

DB

UR

Y S

EN

IOR

HIG

H1,

499

486

53%

17%

32%

2,8

53

SO

UT

HLA

ND

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TS

OU

TH

LAN

D S

EN

IOR

HIG

H18

674

70%

28%

40%

267

SP

RIN

G G

RO

VE

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

SP

RIN

G G

RO

VE

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y4

015

28%

10%

38%

145

SP

RIN

G L

AK

E P

AR

K P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OLS

LEA

RN

ING

ALT

ER

NA

TIV

ES

CO

MM

UN

ITY

SC

H2

415

10%

6%63

%24

0

SP

RIN

G L

AK

E P

AR

K P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OLS

SP

RIN

G L

AK

E P

AR

K S

EN

IOR

HIG

H80

336

76

1%28

%46

%1,

314

SP

RIN

GF

IELD

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TS

PR

ING

FIE

LD S

EC

ON

DA

RY

173

696

7%27

%40

%25

9

ST

PA

UL

CO

NS

ER

VA

TO

RY

PE

RF

OR

MIN

G A

RT

ST

PA

UL

CO

NS

ER

VA

TO

RY

PE

RF

OR

MIN

G A

RT

81

263

7%12

%32

%22

0

ST

. AN

TH

ON

Y-N

EW

BR

IGH

TO

N S

CH

OO

LSS

T.

AN

TH

ON

Y V

ILLA

GE

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

356

105

55%

16%

29%

647

ST

. CH

AR

LES

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TS

T.

CH

AR

LES

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y24

111

96

2%31

%49

%39

0

** I

nd

ica

tes

tha

t th

ere

is n

o co

un

t o

f gra

du

ate

s fo

r th

is s

cho

ol.

In

mos

t ca

ses,

stu

dent

s at

tend

ed t

his

scho

ol a

nd r

epor

ted

to t

he c

olle

ge o

r un

iver

sity

that

the

y "g

radu

ated

" fr

om t

he s

choo

l. H

owev

er,

the

scho

ol d

oes

not

actu

ally

gra

nt t

he d

iplo

ma.

The

dip

lom

a is

typ

ical

ly g

rant

ed b

y an

othe

r hi

gh s

choo

l and

the

gra

duat

e is

the

refo

re r

epor

ted

in t

hat

high

sch

ool's

gra

duat

e co

unt.

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f M

inne

sota

Off

ice

of I

nstit

utio

nal R

esea

rch

and

Re

port

ing

***

The

num

bers

in c

olum

n D

are

und

uplic

ated

with

in M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

and

with

in th

e U

nive

rsity

of

Min

nes

ota.

F

or e

xam

ple,

if a

stu

dent

att

ende

d tw

o M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

in

stitu

tions

, tha

t st

ude

nt

is c

ount

ed o

ne t

ime

in t

he t

otal

for

thi

s ro

w.

Thi

s to

tal m

ay n

ot e

qual

the

tot

al p

rovi

ded

in o

ther

rep

orts

for

the

sam

e hi

gh s

choo

l whe

re t

he c

ount

is n

ot u

ndup

licat

ed.

* E

nrol

lmen

t w

ithin

tw

o ye

ars

of

grad

uatio

n fo

r 20

05-2

008

grad

uate

s an

d w

ithin

one

yea

r of

gra

duat

ion

for

2009

gra

duat

es.

37

Page 50: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Sch

ool D

istr

ict

Hig

h S

choo

l G

radu

ates

***

Gra

duat

es W

ho T

ook

Dev

elop

men

tal

Cou

rses

at M

inne

sota

Pu

blic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n In

stitu

tions

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in

Min

neso

ta P

ublic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n

Gra

duat

es

Who

Too

k at

L

east

One

C

ours

e

% o

f Gra

ds in

M

n P

ublic

H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Tab

le 5

Su

mm

ary

Rep

ort

By

Hig

h S

cho

ol

Enr

olle

d a

t Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

esor

the

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta

Cau

tion

sho

uld

be e

xerc

ised

in in

terp

retin

g th

is s

umm

ary

. T

he c

olle

ge r

eadi

nes

s of

gra

duat

es

wh

enro

lled

in M

inn

esot

a pu

blic

col

lege

s or

uni

vers

ities

may

not

be

a g

ood

indi

cato

r of

the

colle

ge

read

ines

s of

all

grad

uate

s fr

om th

at h

igh

scho

ol.

Col

umn

H in

dica

tes

the

perc

ent

age

of a

ll gr

adu

ates

from

a h

igh

scho

ol th

at to

ok d

evel

opm

enta

l/rem

edia

l cou

rses

at p

ubl

ic c

olle

ges

or

univ

ersi

ties

in M

inne

sota

. H

igh

scho

ols

with

fiv

e or

few

er g

radu

ates

in d

evel

opm

enta

l cou

rses

ar e

not l

iste

d in

divi

dual

ly, b

ut a

re in

clud

ed a

s a

grou

p in

the

tota

ls a

t the

bot

tom

of t

his

repo

rt.

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

(G)

(H)

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ates

Min

neso

ta D

urin

g F

isca

l Yea

rs 2

006

to 2

010

Tot

al N

umbe

r o

f Gra

duat

es

in C

lass

es

2005

- 2

009

% o

f Tot

al

Gra

duat

es

in

Cla

sses

20

05 -

200

9

% o

f T

otal

G

radu

ates

20

05 -

200

9

ST

. CLA

IR P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

ST

. C

LAIR

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y17

160

72%

25%

35%

236

ST

. CLO

UD

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TA

PO

LLO

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

941

299

70%

22%

32%

1,3

35

ST

. CLO

UD

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TT

EC

HN

ICA

L S

EN

IOR

HIG

H1,

128

308

70%

19%

27%

1,6

01

ST

. FR

AN

CIS

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TS

T.

FR

AN

CIS

HIG

H1,

083

474

62%

27%

44%

1,7

60

ST

. JA

ME

S P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

ST

. JA

ME

S S

EC

ON

DA

RY

225

795

4%19

%35

%41

3

ST

. LO

UIS

CO

UN

TY

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

ALB

RO

OK

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y6

735

47%

24%

52%

143

ST

. LO

UIS

CO

UN

TY

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

BA

BB

ITT

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y13

760

79%

35%

44%

173

ST

. LO

UIS

CO

UN

TY

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

CH

ER

RY

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y9

639

63%

25%

41%

153

ST

. LO

UIS

CO

UN

TY

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

CO

OK

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y10

951

59%

28%

47%

184

ST

. LO

UIS

CO

UN

TY

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

CO

TT

ON

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y5

914

69%

16%

24%

85

ST

. LO

UIS

CO

UN

TY

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

OR

R S

EC

ON

DA

RY

61

246

6%26

%39

%93

ST

. LO

UIS

CO

UN

TY

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

TO

WE

R-S

OU

DA

N S

EC

ON

DA

RY

67

296

0%26

%43

%11

1

ST

. LO

UIS

PA

RK

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

.S

T.

LOU

IS P

AR

K S

EN

IOR

HIG

H59

922

45

0%19

%37

%1,

196

ST

. MIC

HA

EL-

ALB

ER

TV

ILLE

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TS

T.

MIC

HA

EL-

AL

BE

RT

VIL

LE S

EN

IOR

HIG

H69

329

55

8%25

%43

%1,

200

ST

. PA

UL

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TA

. G. A

. P. E

. TE

EN

PA

RE

NT

69

594

7%40

%86

%14

6

ST

. PA

UL

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TA

RL

ING

TO

N S

EN

IOR

HIG

H74

949

15

7%38

%66

%1,

303

ST

. PA

UL

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TC

EN

TR

AL

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

976

433

50%

22%

44%

1,9

39

ST

. PA

UL

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TC

OM

O P

AR

K S

EN

IOR

HIG

H70

932

35

8%26

%46

%1,

225

ST

. PA

UL

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TC

RE

AT

IVE

AR

TS

SC

HO

OL

64

354

3%23

%55

%14

9

ST

. PA

UL

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TG

OR

DO

N P

AR

KS

HIG

H S

CH

OO

L10

283

15%

12%

81%

681

ST

. PA

UL

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TH

AR

DIN

G S

EN

IOR

HIG

H98

355

36

0%34

%56

%1,

626

** I

nd

ica

tes

tha

t th

ere

is n

o co

un

t o

f gra

du

ate

s fo

r th

is s

cho

ol.

In

mos

t ca

ses,

stu

dent

s at

tend

ed t

his

scho

ol a

nd r

epor

ted

to t

he c

olle

ge o

r un

iver

sity

that

the

y "g

radu

ated

" fr

om t

he s

choo

l. H

owev

er,

the

scho

ol d

oes

not

actu

ally

gra

nt t

he d

iplo

ma.

The

dip

lom

a is

typ

ical

ly g

rant

ed b

y an

othe

r hi

gh s

choo

l and

the

gra

duat

e is

the

refo

re r

epor

ted

in t

hat

high

sch

ool's

gra

duat

e co

unt.

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f M

inne

sota

Off

ice

of I

nstit

utio

nal R

esea

rch

and

Re

port

ing

***

The

num

bers

in c

olum

n D

are

und

uplic

ated

with

in M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

and

with

in th

e U

nive

rsity

of

Min

nes

ota.

F

or e

xam

ple,

if a

stu

dent

att

ende

d tw

o M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

in

stitu

tions

, tha

t st

ude

nt

is c

ount

ed o

ne t

ime

in t

he t

otal

for

thi

s ro

w.

Thi

s to

tal m

ay n

ot e

qual

the

tot

al p

rovi

ded

in o

ther

rep

orts

for

the

sam

e hi

gh s

choo

l whe

re t

he c

ount

is n

ot u

ndup

licat

ed.

* E

nrol

lmen

t w

ithin

tw

o ye

ars

of

grad

uatio

n fo

r 20

05-2

008

grad

uate

s an

d w

ithin

one

yea

r of

gra

duat

ion

for

2009

gra

duat

es.

38

Page 51: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Sch

ool D

istr

ict

Hig

h S

choo

l G

radu

ates

***

Gra

duat

es W

ho T

ook

Dev

elop

men

tal

Cou

rses

at M

inne

sota

Pu

blic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n In

stitu

tions

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in

Min

neso

ta P

ublic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n

Gra

duat

es

Who

Too

k at

L

east

One

C

ours

e

% o

f Gra

ds in

M

n P

ublic

H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Tab

le 5

Su

mm

ary

Rep

ort

By

Hig

h S

cho

ol

Enr

olle

d a

t Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

esor

the

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta

Cau

tion

sho

uld

be e

xerc

ised

in in

terp

retin

g th

is s

umm

ary

. T

he c

olle

ge r

eadi

nes

s of

gra

duat

es

wh

enro

lled

in M

inn

esot

a pu

blic

col

lege

s or

uni

vers

ities

may

not

be

a g

ood

indi

cato

r of

the

colle

ge

read

ines

s of

all

grad

uate

s fr

om th

at h

igh

scho

ol.

Col

umn

H in

dica

tes

the

perc

ent

age

of a

ll gr

adu

ates

from

a h

igh

scho

ol th

at to

ok d

evel

opm

enta

l/rem

edia

l cou

rses

at p

ubl

ic c

olle

ges

or

univ

ersi

ties

in M

inne

sota

. H

igh

scho

ols

with

fiv

e or

few

er g

radu

ates

in d

evel

opm

enta

l cou

rses

ar e

not l

iste

d in

divi

dual

ly, b

ut a

re in

clud

ed a

s a

grou

p in

the

tota

ls a

t the

bot

tom

of t

his

repo

rt.

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

(G)

(H)

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ates

Min

neso

ta D

urin

g F

isca

l Yea

rs 2

006

to 2

010

Tot

al N

umbe

r o

f Gra

duat

es

in C

lass

es

2005

- 2

009

% o

f Tot

al

Gra

duat

es

in

Cla

sses

20

05 -

200

9

% o

f T

otal

G

radu

ates

20

05 -

200

9

ST

. PA

UL

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TH

IGH

LAN

D P

AR

K S

EN

IOR

HIG

H64

026

75

1%21

%42

%1,

264

ST

. PA

UL

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TH

UM

BO

LDT

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y S

CH

OO

L27

416

05

9%35

%58

%46

2

ST

. PA

UL

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TJO

HN

SO

N S

EN

IOR

HIG

H70

936

76

0%31

%52

%1,

180

ST

. PA

UL

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TLE

AP

HIG

H S

CH

OO

L8

073

87%

79%

91%

92

ST

. PA

UL

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TO

PE

N W

OR

LD L

EA

RN

ING

CO

MM

UN

ITY

51

214

9%20

%41

%10

5

ST

. PE

TE

R P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

ST

. P

ET

ER

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

319

984

9%15

%31

%64

7

ST

AP

LES

-MO

TLE

Y S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TS

TA

PLE

S-M

OT

LEY

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

262

675

2%13

%26

%50

1

ST

EP

HE

N-A

RG

YLE

CE

NT

RA

L S

CH

OO

LSS

TE

PH

EN

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

82

265

2%17

%32

%15

7

ST

EW

AR

TV

ILLE

PU

BL

IC S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TS

TE

WA

RT

VIL

LE S

EN

IOR

HIG

H38

515

66

3%25

%41

%61

5

ST

ILLW

AT

ER

AR

EA

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

.S

TIL

LWA

TE

R A

RE

A H

IGH

SC

HO

OL

1,57

962

44

9%19

%40

%3,

250

ST

UD

IO A

CA

DE

MY

CH

AR

TE

R S

CH

OO

LS

TU

DIO

AC

AD

EM

Y C

HA

RT

ER

SC

HO

OL

47

333

2%22

%70

%14

8

SW

AN

VIL

LE

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TS

WA

NV

ILLE

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y6

817

66%

17%

25%

103

TH

IEF

RIV

ER

FA

LLS

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

LIN

CO

LN S

EN

IOR

HIG

H42

018

95

9%27

%45

%71

3

TR

AC

Y A

RE

A P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

TR

AC

Y S

EC

ON

DA

RY

183

684

8%18

%37

%38

1

TR

EK

NO

RT

H H

IGH

SC

HO

OL

TR

EK

NO

RT

H H

IGH

SC

HO

OL

73

235

5%17

%32

%13

3

TR

I-C

OU

NT

Y S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TT

RI-

CO

UN

TY

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y5

725

50%

22%

44%

113

TR

IO W

OLF

CR

EE

K D

IST

AN

CE

LE

AR

NIN

GT

RIO

WO

LF C

RE

EK

DIS

TA

NC

E L

EA

RN

ING

32

152

3%11

%47

%13

8

TR

ITO

N S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TT

RIT

ON

HIG

H S

CH

OO

L18

882

51%

22%

44%

366

TR

UM

AN

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TT

RU

MA

N S

EC

ON

DA

RY

62

154

3%10

%24

%14

3

UB

AH

ME

DIC

AL

AC

AD

EM

Y C

HA

RT

ER

SC

HO

OL

UB

AH

ME

DIC

AL

AC

AD

EM

Y C

HA

RT

ER

SC

HO

OL

65

525

8%46

%80

%11

3

ULE

N-H

ITT

ER

DA

L P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TU

LEN

-HIT

TE

RD

AL

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y4

612

39%

10%

26%

117

** I

nd

ica

tes

tha

t th

ere

is n

o co

un

t o

f gra

du

ate

s fo

r th

is s

cho

ol.

In

mos

t ca

ses,

stu

dent

s at

tend

ed t

his

scho

ol a

nd r

epor

ted

to t

he c

olle

ge o

r un

iver

sity

that

the

y "g

radu

ated

" fr

om t

he s

choo

l. H

owev

er,

the

scho

ol d

oes

not

actu

ally

gra

nt t

he d

iplo

ma.

The

dip

lom

a is

typ

ical

ly g

rant

ed b

y an

othe

r hi

gh s

choo

l and

the

gra

duat

e is

the

refo

re r

epor

ted

in t

hat

high

sch

ool's

gra

duat

e co

unt.

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f M

inne

sota

Off

ice

of I

nstit

utio

nal R

esea

rch

and

Re

port

ing

***

The

num

bers

in c

olum

n D

are

und

uplic

ated

with

in M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

and

with

in th

e U

nive

rsity

of

Min

nes

ota.

F

or e

xam

ple,

if a

stu

dent

att

ende

d tw

o M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

in

stitu

tions

, tha

t st

ude

nt

is c

ount

ed o

ne t

ime

in t

he t

otal

for

thi

s ro

w.

Thi

s to

tal m

ay n

ot e

qual

the

tot

al p

rovi

ded

in o

ther

rep

orts

for

the

sam

e hi

gh s

choo

l whe

re t

he c

ount

is n

ot u

ndup

licat

ed.

* E

nrol

lmen

t w

ithin

tw

o ye

ars

of

grad

uatio

n fo

r 20

05-2

008

grad

uate

s an

d w

ithin

one

yea

r of

gra

duat

ion

for

2009

gra

duat

es.

39

Page 52: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Sch

ool D

istr

ict

Hig

h S

choo

l G

radu

ates

***

Gra

duat

es W

ho T

ook

Dev

elop

men

tal

Cou

rses

at M

inne

sota

Pu

blic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n In

stitu

tions

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in

Min

neso

ta P

ublic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n

Gra

duat

es

Who

Too

k at

L

east

One

C

ours

e

% o

f Gra

ds in

M

n P

ublic

H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Tab

le 5

Su

mm

ary

Rep

ort

By

Hig

h S

cho

ol

Enr

olle

d a

t Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

esor

the

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta

Cau

tion

sho

uld

be e

xerc

ised

in in

terp

retin

g th

is s

umm

ary

. T

he c

olle

ge r

eadi

nes

s of

gra

duat

es

wh

enro

lled

in M

inn

esot

a pu

blic

col

lege

s or

uni

vers

ities

may

not

be

a g

ood

indi

cato

r of

the

colle

ge

read

ines

s of

all

grad

uate

s fr

om th

at h

igh

scho

ol.

Col

umn

H in

dica

tes

the

perc

ent

age

of a

ll gr

adu

ates

from

a h

igh

scho

ol th

at to

ok d

evel

opm

enta

l/rem

edia

l cou

rses

at p

ubl

ic c

olle

ges

or

univ

ersi

ties

in M

inne

sota

. H

igh

scho

ols

with

fiv

e or

few

er g

radu

ates

in d

evel

opm

enta

l cou

rses

ar e

not l

iste

d in

divi

dual

ly, b

ut a

re in

clud

ed a

s a

grou

p in

the

tota

ls a

t the

bot

tom

of t

his

repo

rt.

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

(G)

(H)

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ates

Min

neso

ta D

urin

g F

isca

l Yea

rs 2

006

to 2

010

Tot

al N

umbe

r o

f Gra

duat

es

in C

lass

es

2005

- 2

009

% o

f Tot

al

Gra

duat

es

in

Cla

sses

20

05 -

200

9

% o

f T

otal

G

radu

ates

20

05 -

200

9

UN

DE

RW

OO

D P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

UN

DE

RW

OO

D S

EC

ON

DA

RY

88

485

0%27

%55

%17

5

UN

ITE

D S

OU

TH

CE

NT

RA

L S

CH

OO

L D

IST

.U

NIT

ED

SO

UT

H C

EN

TR

AL

HIG

H S

CH

OO

L21

757

53%

14%

26%

412

UP

SA

LA P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

UP

SA

LA S

EC

ON

DA

RY

90

236

3%16

%26

%14

2

VE

RN

DA

LE P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

VE

RN

DA

LE S

EC

ON

DA

RY

91

236

1%16

%25

%14

8

VIR

GIN

IA P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

VIR

GIN

IA S

EC

ON

DA

RY

421

117

68%

19%

28%

616

VO

YA

GE

UR

S E

XP

ED

ITIO

NA

RY

VO

YA

GE

UR

S E

XP

ED

ITIO

NA

RY

HIG

H S

CH

OO

L3

622

45%

28%

61%

80

WA

BA

SH

A-K

ELL

OG

G P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

WA

BA

SH

A-K

ELL

OG

G S

EC

ON

DA

RY

158

835

6%29

%53

%28

2

WA

BA

SS

O P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

WA

BA

SS

O S

EC

ON

DA

RY

112

345

8%18

%30

%19

3

WA

CO

NIA

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TW

AC

ON

IA S

EN

IOR

HIG

H48

017

85

1%19

%37

%93

6

WA

DE

NA

-DE

ER

CR

EE

K S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TW

AD

EN

A-D

EE

R C

RE

EK

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

320

946

3%18

%29

%50

9

WA

LKE

R-H

AC

KE

NS

AC

K-A

KE

LEY

SC

HL.

DIS

TW

ALK

ER

-HA

CK

EN

SA

CK

-AK

ELE

Y S

EC

.18

262

59%

20%

34%

307

WA

RR

EN

-ALV

AR

AD

O-O

SLO

SC

HO

OL

DIS

T.

WA

RR

EN

-ALV

AR

AD

O-O

SLO

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y9

429

44%

14%

31%

212

WA

RR

OA

D P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

WA

RR

OA

D H

IGH

SC

HO

OL

279

135

53%

26%

48%

527

WA

SE

CA

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TW

AS

EC

A S

EN

IOR

HIG

H41

914

55

3%18

%35

%78

4

WA

TE

RT

OW

N-M

AY

ER

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

.W

AT

ER

TO

WN

MA

YE

R H

IGH

315

128

53%

22%

41%

594

WA

TE

RV

ILLE

-ELY

SIA

N-M

OR

RIS

TO

WN

WA

TE

RV

ILLE

-ELY

SIA

N-M

OR

RIS

TO

WN

SR

.18

168

56%

21%

38%

322

WA

UB

UN

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TW

AU

BU

N S

EC

ON

DA

RY

96

375

5%21

%39

%17

4

WA

YZ

AT

A P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

WA

YZ

AT

A H

IGH

1,53

342

64

3%12

%28

%3,

562

WE

ST

CE

NT

RA

L A

RE

AW

ES

T C

EN

TR

AL

AR

EA

SE

C.

199

475

9%14

%24

%33

5

WE

ST

ST

. PA

UL-

ME

ND

OT

A H

TS

.-E

AG

AN

HE

NR

Y S

IBLE

Y S

EN

IOR

HIG

H79

929

75

1%19

%37

%1,

567

WE

ST

BR

OO

K-W

ALN

UT

GR

OV

E S

CH

OO

LSW

ES

TB

RO

OK

-WA

LNU

T G

RO

VE

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y12

462

59%

30%

50%

209

** I

nd

ica

tes

tha

t th

ere

is n

o co

un

t o

f gra

du

ate

s fo

r th

is s

cho

ol.

In

mos

t ca

ses,

stu

dent

s at

tend

ed t

his

scho

ol a

nd r

epor

ted

to t

he c

olle

ge o

r un

iver

sity

that

the

y "g

radu

ated

" fr

om t

he s

choo

l. H

owev

er,

the

scho

ol d

oes

not

actu

ally

gra

nt t

he d

iplo

ma.

The

dip

lom

a is

typ

ical

ly g

rant

ed b

y an

othe

r hi

gh s

choo

l and

the

gra

duat

e is

the

refo

re r

epor

ted

in t

hat

high

sch

ool's

gra

duat

e co

unt.

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f M

inne

sota

Off

ice

of I

nstit

utio

nal R

esea

rch

and

Re

port

ing

***

The

num

bers

in c

olum

n D

are

und

uplic

ated

with

in M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

and

with

in th

e U

nive

rsity

of

Min

nes

ota.

F

or e

xam

ple,

if a

stu

dent

att

ende

d tw

o M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

in

stitu

tions

, tha

t st

ude

nt

is c

ount

ed o

ne t

ime

in t

he t

otal

for

thi

s ro

w.

Thi

s to

tal m

ay n

ot e

qual

the

tot

al p

rovi

ded

in o

ther

rep

orts

for

the

sam

e hi

gh s

choo

l whe

re t

he c

ount

is n

ot u

ndup

licat

ed.

* E

nrol

lmen

t w

ithin

tw

o ye

ars

of

grad

uatio

n fo

r 20

05-2

008

grad

uate

s an

d w

ithin

one

yea

r of

gra

duat

ion

for

2009

gra

duat

es.

40

Page 53: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

Sch

ool D

istr

ict

Hig

h S

choo

l G

radu

ates

***

Gra

duat

es W

ho T

ook

Dev

elop

men

tal

Cou

rses

at M

inne

sota

Pu

blic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n In

stitu

tions

Gra

duat

es E

nrol

led

in

Min

neso

ta P

ublic

Hig

her

Edu

catio

n

Gra

duat

es

Who

Too

k at

L

east

One

C

ours

e

% o

f Gra

ds in

M

n P

ublic

H

ighe

r E

duca

tion

Tab

le 5

Su

mm

ary

Rep

ort

By

Hig

h S

cho

ol

Enr

olle

d a

t Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

esor

the

Uni

vers

ity o

f Min

neso

ta

Cau

tion

sho

uld

be e

xerc

ised

in in

terp

retin

g th

is s

umm

ary

. T

he c

olle

ge r

eadi

nes

s of

gra

duat

es

wh

enro

lled

in M

inn

esot

a pu

blic

col

lege

s or

uni

vers

ities

may

not

be

a g

ood

indi

cato

r of

the

colle

ge

read

ines

s of

all

grad

uate

s fr

om th

at h

igh

scho

ol.

Col

umn

H in

dica

tes

the

perc

ent

age

of a

ll gr

adu

ates

from

a h

igh

scho

ol th

at to

ok d

evel

opm

enta

l/rem

edia

l cou

rses

at p

ubl

ic c

olle

ges

or

univ

ersi

ties

in M

inne

sota

. H

igh

scho

ols

with

fiv

e or

few

er g

radu

ates

in d

evel

opm

enta

l cou

rses

ar e

not l

iste

d in

divi

dual

ly, b

ut a

re in

clud

ed a

s a

grou

p in

the

tota

ls a

t the

bot

tom

of t

his

repo

rt.

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

(G)

(H)

2005

- 2

009*

Min

nes

ota

Pub

lic H

igh

Sch

ool G

radu

ates

Min

neso

ta D

urin

g F

isca

l Yea

rs 2

006

to 2

010

Tot

al N

umbe

r o

f Gra

duat

es

in C

lass

es

2005

- 2

009

% o

f Tot

al

Gra

duat

es

in

Cla

sses

20

05 -

200

9

% o

f T

otal

G

radu

ates

20

05 -

200

9

WE

ST

ON

KA

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TM

OU

ND

-WE

ST

ON

KA

HIG

H S

CH

OO

L38

213

34

8%17

%35

%79

4

WH

EA

TO

N A

RE

A P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

WH

EA

TO

N S

EC

ON

DA

RY

88

234

9%13

%26

%18

1

WH

ITE

BE

AR

LA

KE

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

WH

ITE

BE

AR

SO

UT

H C

AM

PU

S S

EN

IOR

1,75

484

65

7%28

%48

%3,

072

WIL

LMA

R P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

WIL

LMA

R S

EN

IOR

HIG

H82

136

76

0%27

%45

%1,

375

WIL

LOW

RIV

ER

PU

BL

IC S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TW

ILLO

W R

IVE

R S

EC

ON

DA

RY

78

364

8%22

%46

%16

2

WIN

DO

M P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

WIN

DO

M S

EN

IOR

HIG

H23

372

65%

20%

31%

361

WIN

-E-M

AC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

WIN

-E-M

AC

SE

CO

ND

AR

Y8

834

45%

17%

39%

195

WIN

ON

A A

RE

A P

UB

LIC

SC

HO

OL

DIS

TR

ICT

WIN

ON

A S

EN

IOR

HIG

H90

943

76

2%30

%48

%1,

461

WO

RT

HIN

GT

ON

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TW

OR

TH

ING

TO

N S

EN

IOR

HIG

H42

514

65

9%20

%34

%72

6

WR

EN

SH

ALL

PU

BLI

C S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TW

RE

NS

HA

LL S

EC

ON

DA

RY

70

324

5%21

%46

%15

6

YE

LLO

W M

ED

ICIN

E E

AS

TY

ELL

OW

ME

DIC

INE

EA

ST

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

277

133

69%

33%

48%

399

ZU

MB

RO

TA

-MA

ZE

PP

A S

CH

OO

L D

IST

RIC

TZ

UM

BR

OT

A-M

AZ

EP

PA

SE

NIO

R H

IGH

250

965

6%21

%38

%44

8

4,3

5358

730

51

3%7%

52%

Hig

h s

cho

ols

wit

h le

ss t

han

20

gra

du

ates

en

rolle

d in

pu

blic

hig

h e

du

cati

on

an

d/o

r w

ith

5 o

r fe

wer

g

rad

uat

es in

dev

elo

pm

enta

l co

urs

es

278,

894

152,

161

59,8

20

55%

21%

39%

TO

TA

L F

OR

RE

PO

RT

ED

HIG

H S

CH

OO

LS

297,

593

152,

161

59,8

20

51%

20%

39%

TO

TA

L P

UB

LIC

HIG

H S

CH

OO

L G

RA

DU

AT

ES

** I

nd

ica

tes

tha

t th

ere

is n

o co

un

t o

f gra

du

ate

s fo

r th

is s

cho

ol.

In

mos

t ca

ses,

stu

dent

s at

tend

ed t

his

scho

ol a

nd r

epor

ted

to t

he c

olle

ge o

r un

iver

sity

that

the

y "g

radu

ated

" fr

om t

he s

choo

l. H

owev

er,

the

scho

ol d

oes

not

actu

ally

gra

nt t

he d

iplo

ma.

The

dip

lom

a is

typ

ical

ly g

rant

ed b

y an

othe

r hi

gh s

choo

l and

the

gra

duat

e is

the

refo

re r

epor

ted

in t

hat

high

sch

ool's

gra

duat

e co

unt.

Sou

rce:

Min

neso

ta S

tate

Col

lege

s an

d U

nive

rsiti

es R

esea

rch

and

Uni

vers

ity o

f M

inne

sota

Off

ice

of I

nstit

utio

nal R

esea

rch

and

Re

port

ing

***

The

num

bers

in c

olum

n D

are

und

uplic

ated

with

in M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

and

with

in th

e U

nive

rsity

of

Min

nes

ota.

F

or e

xam

ple,

if a

stu

dent

att

ende

d tw

o M

inne

sota

Sta

te C

olle

ges

and

Uni

vers

ities

in

stitu

tions

, tha

t st

ude

nt

is c

ount

ed o

ne t

ime

in t

he t

otal

for

thi

s ro

w.

Thi

s to

tal m

ay n

ot e

qual

the

tot

al p

rovi

ded

in o

ther

rep

orts

for

the

sam

e hi

gh s

choo

l whe

re t

he c

ount

is n

ot u

ndup

licat

ed.

* E

nrol

lmen

t w

ithin

tw

o ye

ars

of

grad

uatio

n fo

r 20

05-2

008

grad

uate

s an

d w

ithin

one

yea

r of

gra

duat

ion

for

2009

gra

duat

es.

41

Page 54: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason

42

Page 55: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason
Page 56: Summary Report 2010 DRAFT V3 - Minnesota State - Home · v percent. Since then, the remedial course-taking rate increased to 40 percent for the class of 2008. One possible reason