Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Summary Rating Responses
November 13, 2013 Adobe Connect Webinar
Bill Bagshaw, Kayeri Akweks - KSDE
Supporting Effective Instruction and Leadership
Implement teacher and principal evaluation and support systems that:
Are used for continual improvement of instruction
Use at least 3 performance levels Use multiple measures including
student growth as significant factor Are used to evaluate on a regular basis Provide clear, timely, and useful
feedback Are used to inform personnel
decisions
WAIVER - Principle 3
The Evaluation Process
TEACHERThe constructs to be measured in the
evaluation instrument:
Construct 1: Learner and Learning
Construct 2: Content Knowledge
Construct 4: Professional Responsibility
Construct 3: Instructional Practice
The Evaluation Process TEACHER
The constructs to be measured in the
evaluation instrument:
Construct 1: Learner and Learning
Construct 2: Content Knowledge
Construct 4: Professional Responsibility
Construct 3: Instructional Practice
2. Content KnowledgeComponents:2.1 The teacher demonstrates a thorough knowledge of the content.2.2 The teacher provides a variety of innovative applications of knowledge.
1. Learner and LearningComponents:1.1 The teacher plans instruction based on learning and developmental levels of all students.
1.2 The teacher recognizes and fosters individual differences to establish a positive classroom culture.
1.3 The teacher establishes a classroom environment conducive to learning.
3. Instructional PracticeComponents:3.1 The teacher uses methods and techniques that are effective in meeting student needs.
3.2 The teacher uses varied assessments to measure learner progress.3.3 The teacher delivers comprehensive instruction for students.
4. Content KnowledgeComponents:4.1 The teacher engages in reflection and continuous growth.4.2 The teacher participates in collaboration and leadership opportunities.
Inter-Rater Reliability
Evaluation Process
Reliability refers to the consistency of the entire evaluation process. Validity means that the process is measuring what it was intended to measure.
KSDE Expectation All school district evaluators attend professional learning activities that address the issue of reliability relative to using the KEEP Rubrics.
The same expectations apply to districts using an evaluation system other than KEEP.
Evaluating the Teacher Thinking through
and discussing the Process
Goals Selected
Multiple Measures selected
Timeline for Evaluation 1 Cycle 2 Cycles
Evaluation Process
Teacher Process • Required Steps• Implementation
Ideas
Su
mm
ary
R
ati
ng
She
et –
Con
struct #
1
Summary Rating Sheet – Signatures
What is Coming? What Needs to be Prepared for Next Year??
• Discussions about Goal setting and whether to set building or district Goals through the evaluation process
• Discussions about what you would like to work better in the KEEP Repository
• Discussions about Measures that are currently used and any Measures that will be used in the future
• Discussions about adding Student Growth Measures to the Evaluation Process for next year
Next Year 2014-2015
Multiple Measures
Must include state assessments as expected
Include assessment measures currently in use in your district
Shared credit/responsibility for student growth
Time for student growth 1-4 years
Next Year 2014-2015
Builder Leaders and District Leaders Co-Construct the Educator Evaluation
Multiple MeasuresDistrict Selections – from default list or KSDE other approved measuresValidation – REL, KSDE content area specialists, or LEA able to meet valid and reliable criteria
Significant Student GrowthDetermining significant – Matrix, Other SamplesEstablishing timeline for growth – Student Growth Percentile
Next Year 2014-2015
14
Multiple Measures, Effectiveness, Significance
1st Student Growth
Measure Rating
+ 2nd Student Growth
Measure Rating
+ 3rd Student Growth
Measure Rating
= Student Growth
Summary
+ Student Learning
+ Content Knowledg
e
+ Instructional Practice
+ Professional
Responsibility
= Summative Evaluation Rating
Met Met Met Highly Effective
Highly Effective
Highly Effective
Highly Effective
Highly Effective
Highly Effective
Met Met Met Highly Effective
Effective Effective Effective Effective Highly Effective or Effective
Met Met Met Highly Effective
Developing Developing Developing Developing Effective or Developing
Met Met Not Met Effective Highly Effective
Highly Effective
Highly Effective
Highly Effective
Effective
Met Met Not Met Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective
Met Met Not Met Effective Developing Developing Developing Developing Developing
Met Not Met Not Met Developing Effective Effective Effective Effective Developing
Met Not Met Not Met Developing Developing Developing Developing Developing Developing
Met Not Met Not Met Developing Ineffective Ineffective Ineffective Ineffective Ineffective
Not Met Not Met Not Met Ineffective Developing Developing Developing Developing Developing or Ineffective
Not Met Not Met Not Met Ineffective Ineffective Ineffective Ineffective Ineffective Ineffective
Matrix Used to Determine Summative Evaluation Rating
8/6/2013
Matrix Used to Determine Summative Evaluation Rating Rules
1. Must meet all three student growth measures to be considered highly effective.
2. Must meet at least two student growth measures to be considered effective.
3. Can only be considered developing if meeting only one student growth measure
4. Can only be rated one performance level higher than the lowest summary rating.
5. When all summary ratings are the same, that rating becomes the performance level.
Next Year 2014-2015
Multiple Measures and Significance Summary • Teachers and Leaders evaluations include
multiple measures as evidence
• Kansas is defining “significance” as demonstrating student growth using MORE than one measure
• Must consider state assessments
• May include assessment measures currently in use in your district
• Validity of the Measure must be pre-determined for any appropriate measure
• Locally determine credit/responsibility for student growth
• Time for student growth 1-4 years
Next Year 2014-2015
NEW !! KEEP Guided Practice http://
training.ksde.org/keep/trainingportal/web/index.htm
New Online Training – open 24/7
Individualized and Repeatable
Includes multiple forms of Learning
Available from links on the KEEP Webpage
Must enable JAVA to operate
KEEP Guided Practice
http://www.ksde.org/Default.aspx?tabid=4400
1. News and Announcements 2. KEEP Repository Registration 3. KEEP Training Materials and Schedule 4. Archives with Materials of Previous
Trainings and Meetings5. Assurances Information 6. Kansas Flexibility Waiver Materials
KEEP Webpage
Questions ??
An Equal Employment/Educational Opportunity AgencyThe Kansas State Department of Education does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, disability, or age in its programs and activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies: KSDE General Counsel, 120 SE 10th Ave., Topeka, KS 66612; 785-296-3201
Contacts:
Bill Bagshaw, Assistant DirectorTeacher Licensure & [email protected]
Kayeri Akweks, Education Program ConsultantTeacher Education and Licensure [email protected]
