19
SUMMARY 2013

Summary of the Y8 and Y20 2013

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

This brochure summarizes the results of the Y8 and Y20 Summit. Both summits were organized in collaboration with The IDEA and Policy Innovation.

Citation preview

Page 1: Summary of the Y8 and Y20 2013

SUMMARY  2013

Page 2: Summary of the Y8 and Y20 2013

OUTLINE

6 The Y8 and Y20 Summit

3 The IDEA

16 Impressions from the Y8

2

Dear  Reader,

This  brochure   is  meant   to  provide  an  overview   of   the   Y8   and   the  Y20  Summit  2013.   Both  summits  were  geared  toward  students  from  G8   and  

G20   countries   and   sought   to   give   the   youth   a   stronger   voice   in  contemporary  global  poliHcs.  

This  brochure  provides  an  insight  into  the  concepts  behind  both  summits,  reflecHons  on  the  experiences  and  a  summary  of  the  soluHons  envisioned  

by   more   than   300   young   bright   minds   who   came   together   in   St.  Petersburg,  Russia  and  London,  United  Kingdom.  

While  both  Final  Communiques  can  be  accessed  separately,  the  summary  of   the   Communiquès   encompasses   excerpts   of   the   most   important/

innovaHve  ideas  and  short  comments  from  the  German  DelegaHon.  As  the  summary  only  provides  a  brief  overview  of  the  most  interesHng  ideas,  we  encourage  every   reader   to  take  a  look  at   both  Final  Communiqués  and  hope  that  this  document  will  raise  interest  to  do  so.

The  Policy  InnovaHon  Team

19 Policy Innovation

Page 3: Summary of the Y8 and Y20 2013

THE IDEA

3

Along  with  the  first  G8  Youth  Summit  2006  in  St.  Petersburg,  the  members  of  the  organizing  teams  in  their  respecHve  parHcipaHng  countries  decided  to   create   a   more   formal   structure   to   enhance   the   coordinaHon   and  organizaHon  of  the  G8  Youth  Summit  under  the  auspices  of  the  G8  Youth  

Network.   Both   the  summits  as  well  as   the  network  were  rebranded   in  2013   to  become  the  Y8  and  Y20   Summit,   organized  by   the  InternaHonal  DiplomaHc   Engagement   AssociaHon  (The   IDEA).   Its  aim   is  to  bridge  the  coordinaHng   elements  between  all  G8   and  G20   organizing   commi^ees,  thereby  ensuring  future  cooperaHon  among  the  organizing  commi^ees  of  

the  Y8  and  Y20  Summits.

The  organizaHon   of   the  annual  Y8   and   Y20   Summits  requires  extensive  preparaHon  by  the  host  countries‘  organizing  commi^ees.  They  are  tasked  to   find   an   appropriate   venue,   create   an   interesHng   and   demanding  

program  for  the  summit  by  inviHng  speakers  and  above  all  secure  funding.  

To  assist  each  year’s  new  host  countries  to  meet  the  challenge  these  tasks  present,  The  IDEA  seeks  to  provide  all  members  with  technical  assistance  and  support.  To  this  end,  The  IDEA  emphasizes  knowledge  sharing  and  the  

communicaHon  of  lessons  learned  and  best  pracHces.  

Furthermore,  the  Network  serves  as  a  pool  in  which  the  members  of  the  organizing  teams  are  able  to  search  for  informaHon  on  important  ma^ers  such  as  delegate  preparaHon,  course  and  topics  of  the  summit  as  well  as  

on  strategies  on  how  to  communicate  the  results  to  the  interested  public,  poliHcians  and  media.

Page 4: Summary of the Y8 and Y20 2013

The IDEA

4

Above   all,   The   IDEA‘s   role   is   to   ensure   that   the   summits   take   place  annually   in  line  with   its  global  vision.   The  decision-­‐making  structures  in  the  network  promote  the  involvement  of  all  members  in  deciding  on  the  core  quesHons  regarding  the  summit.  Simultaneously,  enough  flexibility  is  

leb   for   the  host  countries  organizing  commi^ees  to  shape  the  event  the  way   they   see   fit.   In   return,   the   preparaHon   and   organizaHon   of   the  respecHve  naHonal  delegaHons  remains  the  responsibility  of  each  naHonal  organizing  commitee.

The  Y8  and  Y20  Summits  and  its  predecessors  have  been  held  so  far  in  the  following  countries:

➡ 03.04  –  09.04.2006,  Model  G8  Youth  Summit,        St.  Petersburg,  Russia  

➡ 26.04  –  30.04.2007,  Model  G8  Youth  Summit,      Berlin,  Germany  

➡ 11.03  –  16.03.2008,  Model  G8  Youth  Summit,      Tokyo  &  Yokohama,  Japan  

➡ 16.03  –  20.03.2009,  G8  Youth  Summit

     Milan,  Italy➡ 09.05  –  14.05.2010,  G8/G20  Youth  Summit

     Vancouver,  Canada➡ 29.05.  –  03.06.2011,  G8  &  G20  Youth  Summits,  

     Paris,  France

➡ 03.06  –  09.06.2012,  G8  &  G20  Youth  Summits,      Washington,  D.C.,  USA

➡ 17.06.  –  21.06.2013,  Y20  Summit,  St.  Petersburg,  Russia➡ 24.06.  –  28.06.2013,  Y8  Summit,  London,  United  Kingdom

The  nine  Summits  were  a^ended  by  more  than  1000  delegates  as  well  as  nearly   400   organizers   from   over   20   countries.   They   shared   47   days  together  and  had  numerous  discussions.

The  nine  Summits  have  so  far  produced  more  than   300  pages  with  new  

and  innovaHve  proposals  for  a  broad  variety  of  global  challenges.  In  total  an  esHmated  1000   hours  were  spent   in  discussions.   The  average   sleep  Hme  of  a  delegate  during  the  Summits  is  four  hours  per  night.

Page 5: Summary of the Y8 and Y20 2013

The IDEA

5

Four   of   the  G8   and  G20   countries  are  part   of   the  European   Union.   Six  Countries   are   members   of   the  NATO.   In   2010   the   G8   Youth   Summit  became  the  G8/G20   Youth   Summit   by   inviHng  delegaHons  from  all  G20  

countries.   In   2013   the   summits  were   split   for   the   first   Hme   into   one  summit  dedicated  to  the  G8,  the  Y8  summit,  and  one  for  the  G20,  the  Y20  summit.   Both   summits   were   endorsed   by   the   Russia   and   BriHsh  government,  respecHvely.

The  Summits  have  more  than  20   groups   on   Facebook,   with  more  than  3000   members.   The   IDEA‘s   Facebook-­‐Site   alone   has   5500   Likes.   The  project  is  responsible  for  more  than  1000  new  friendships  worldwide,  and  several  internaHonal  relaHonships.  

The   IDEA   is   about   building   bridges,   creaHng   and   understanding   about  global   issues,   assisHng   in  finding   new   ways   forward   and   grounded   on  personal  relaHonships  and  commitment.  We  are  the  biggest   truly  global  organizaTon  enHrely  relient  upon  the  voluntary  work  of  the  many  around  the  world.  

We  shape  the  future  -­‐  our  future!

Heads  of  The  IDEA‘s  member  organisaTons,  Krasnoyarsk,  2013

Page 6: Summary of the Y8 and Y20 2013

The Y8 and the Y20 Summit

6

The  Y8  and  Y20  Summit  are  unique  internaHonal  youth  conferences  that  bring  together  young  leaders  represenHng  their  own  naHons  within  the  G8  and   G20   to   facilitate   discussions   of   internaHonal   affairs   and   promote  cross-­‐cultural  understanding.   The   Summits   are   a   global   youth   iniHaHve  

that   run   parallel  to  real  world   events  concerning   the  G8   and  G20.   The  parHcipaHng   students   are   asked   to   envision   innovaHve   but   realisHc  soluHons  for  global  challenges.  

In  2013,  the  Y8  Summit  took  place  in  London,  United  Kingdom,  whereas  the  Y20   took  place  in  St.  Petersburg,  Russia.  Over   a  period  of   five  days  

each,   the  delegaHons  from  the  20  present   countries  not   only  negoHated  the   Final   Communiqués,   but   gained   an   unparalleled   insight   into   the  pracHce   of   diplomacy.   Moreover,   aside   from   various   speeches   by  reknowned   poliHcians   or   civil   society   acHvists,   the   delegaHons  parHcipaHng   in  the  Y20   had   the  unique  chance  to  parHcipate   in  the  St.  

Petersburg  Economic  Forum.  

The  Heads  of   State  of  both   the  Y8  and  Y20  delegaHons  synthesized  the  recommendaHons  of  their  ministers  into  one  Final  Communiqué  each  for  the  two  summits  in  an  exciHng   late  night  session.   The  Heads  of  State  of  the   Y20   DelegaHons   had   aberwards   the   unique   chance   to   meet   with  

Russian  President  Vladimir  PuHn  to  discuss  their  proposals.

The  German  DelegaTon  to  the  Y20,  St.  Petersburg,  2013

Page 7: Summary of the Y8 and Y20 2013

The Y8 and Y20 Summit

8 HEADS OF STATE

9 FINANCE

12 DEVELOPMENT

11 ENVIRONMENT

14 DEFENCE

13 FOREIGN AFFAIRS

10 ECONOMICS

7

The   resulHng   Final   Communiqués   envision   soluHons   to   current   global  challenges.   While   the   enHre   Final   Communiques   can   be   accessed  separately,  the  following  pages  encompass  quotes  of  the  most  important/innovaHve  ideas  and   short   comments  from   the  German  DelegaHon.  We  

encourage  you   to   take  a  look   at   the   enHre   Final  Communiqué  of   both  summits  and  hope  that   this  document   has  given  you   interest   to  do  so.  Both   Final  Communiqués  as  well  as  all  previsous  publicaHons  of   Policy  InnovaHon  and  The  IDEA  can  be  accessed  on  our  website  at

h]p://www.policy-­‐innovaTon.org.

15 JUSTICE

Page 8: Summary of the Y8 and Y20 2013

Unfortunately,   both  a  military   and  a  poliHcal  soluHon  in   Syria  seem  unrealisHc   in   the  short-­‐term.  We  all   acknowledged   the  messy   realiHes   on   the   ground   and   we   focused   on   the  establishment   of   safeguarded  humanitarian  corridors.   To  me,  this  parHal  consensus   between   the  West   and   Russia  showed  that   despite  all  the  challenges  in  Western  Russian  relaHons  a  poliHcal  se^lement  could  be  reached.

To   me,   the   idea   behind   this   paragraph   is   of   the   utmost  importance.   It   symbolizes  part  of   a  strong  consensus  amongst  the   youth   presented   at   the   Y20   that   the   Bre^on-­‐Woods  insHtuHons,   as  well  as  the  UN   family,   have  to  be  reformed   in  order   to  be^er   reflect  the  realiHes  of  the  21st   century.  Failure  would  only   lead  to  a  further   lack  of   credibility   and  legiHmacy.  The  anachronisHc  US/European  monopoly   in  selecHng  WB/IMF  leadership,  for  instance,  is  obviously  only  part  of  the  build-­‐up  of  reforms.  In  the  context  of  Western  decline,  we  all  agreed  that  a  much  stronger  and  fairer  rules-­‐based  liberal  internaHonal  order  is  required  to  facilitate  a  peaceful  rise  of  new  world-­‐powers.

HEADS OF STATE

8

The  G20  should  support  the  establishment  of  “safety  corridors”  within  Syria  for  civilians  and  refugees  (…)  This  would  include  an  internaHonal  peacekeeping  force  to  be  recruited  by  the  United  States  and  Russia  for  the  protecHon  of  the  safe  corridors.  The  US  and  Russia  would  also  coordinate  humanitarian  aid,  as  exisHng  moderators  in  the  conflict,  for  these  safety  corridors.  (…)  The  safety  corridors  will  be  considered  no-­‐fly  zones  (…)”  (P.  12  |  Y8)

„“We   encourage   reform   in   IMF   and   World   Bank  

leadership   to   be   based   on   transparent   and   merit-­‐based  criteria,  avoiding  regional  preferences.  (P.  1  |  Y20)  

“ Y8Y20

Ma_

a  Nelles

Ma_

a  Nelles

Page 9: Summary of the Y8 and Y20 2013

In  Hmes  of  financial  crises  and  ever  eroding  welfare-­‐states,  it  is  an   unsustainable   circumstance,   both   economically   and  poliHcally,  that  more  than  £  3   trillion  are  hidden  away   in  global  off-­‐shore  accounts.   In   closing   such   drainage  points,   the  G20  states  would  give  themselves  more  room  for    manoeuvring  and  greater   opHons   in   facing   the   challenges   of   the   21st   century,  such   as   demographic   change,   climate   change   and   the  restructuring  of  their  industries  and  labour  markets.

With   the   ever   increasing   rate   of   globalizaHon,   it   is   of   great  importance  that  policy  makers  and  public  authoriHes  do  not  lag  behind   criminal   structures.   Only   through   taking   joint   and  decisive  acHon  can  governments  hope  to  successfully   combat  global   and   systemaHc   criminal   acHvity.   In   the   21st   century  naHonal   secrecy   and   solo   efforts  are   anHquated   methods  of  operaHon.   In   areas   of   global   consequence,   cooperaHon  between   naHons,   especially   among   the  G20,   is  the  only   way  towards  a  sustainable  future.

FINANCE

9

We   recognize   the   harm   caused   by   tax   havens  through   the   erosion   of   other   country’s   fiscal  bases.  [...]  We   strongly   recommend:   (a)   imposing  a   tax   on  cash   flows   directly   connected   with   tax   havens;   (b)  encouraging   countries   to   systemaHcally   exchange  financial   and   fiscal   informaHon;   and   (c)   closing   tax  loopholes  exercised  by  third  party  countries.  (P.2  |  Y20)„

We   recognize   the   urgency   in   combaHng   illegal  financial  acHviHes  such  as  money  laundering  and  tax  evasion.   Therefore   we   recommend   seta-­‐blishing   a  protocol   focused   on   compiling  and   sharing  financial  intelligence,  which  would  enable  naHonal  task  forces  to  cooperate  internaHonally.  (P.  2  |  Y20)„

“ Y8Y20

Irene

 Ada

mski

Irene

 Ada

mski

Page 10: Summary of the Y8 and Y20 2013

The  problem  of  inordinate  indebtedness  rather  concerns  the  G7  member  states  (i.e.  the  large  Western  European  economies,  the  US,   Canada   and   Japan)   than   any   of   the   emerging   powers.  However,  a  debt  crisis  in  one  of  the  G20  member  states  deeply  affects  all  other  major   economies  of  the  world.  While  the  first  group   mostly   recognizes   internaHonal   coordinaHon   and  commitments   as   a   potenHal   soluHon   to   stop   the   trend   of  increasing   indebtedness,   the   emerging   powers   do   not   have  enough  reasons  for  limiHng  their  sovereignty.  A  compromise  on  an   internaHonal   commitment   should,   therefore,   rather   be  sought   in  the  framework  of  the  G8   than  of  the  G20,  while  the  la^er   is  sHll  an  appropriate  plaxorm  for  construcHng  a  reliable  system  of  transparency  in  fiscal  policies.

ECONOMICS

10

With   regard   to   each   naHon’s   sovereignty,   we  recommend   that   the   G20   countries   strive   towards  fiscal   sustainability   and   take   into   account   country-­‐specific   factors.   We   suggest   that   the  G20   countries  set   transparent   budget  performance   targets.   (P.  2   |  Y20)„

We  recommend  the  use  of  naHonal  oversight  bodies  to   coordinate   the   development   of   long-­‐term  infrastructure  projects  that  cut  across  poliHcal  cycles  and   to   promote   the   use   of   open   government   in  making  policy  and  investment  decisions.  (P.  4  |  Y20)„

While   the   most-­‐developed   countries   have   a   well   developed  infrastructure   system   and   therefore,   rather   concentrate   on  conservaHon   and   maintenance   than   development   in   their  infrastructure   policies,   the   emerging   powers  of   the   G20   sHll  expand  it.   It   is  in  the  interest   of  every   G20  state  to  have  well  funcHoning  infrastructure  systems  in  the  developing  countries,  as   these   are   the   basis   for   further   growth   and   economic  cooperaHon.   To   ensure   a   long-­‐Hme   planning   of   the   infra-­‐structure   development   and   to   avoid   drasHc   cuts   aber   the  change  of  poliHcal  representaHon,  every  state  is  recommended  to   use   an   oversight   body   which   monitors   and   plans  infrastructure  policies  across  poliHcal  cycles.

Y8Y20

Micha

el  Borsky

Micha

el  Borsky

Page 11: Summary of the Y8 and Y20 2013

Support  will  be  provided  through  the  establishment  of  an  internaHonal  fund  to  financially  assist  small-­‐scale  farmers  in  the  transiHon  from  convenHonal  to  sustainable  agriculture  pracHces.  (P.  43  |  Y8)  „

A  more  transparent  global  food  market   is  essenHal  in  allowing  consumers   to   make   informed   choices   with   regards   to   the  products   they   purchase.   Although   full   transparency   will   be  difficult   to   achieve,   especially   the   availability   of   approximate  CO2   emissions   per   producHon   unit   will  not   only   allow   more  informed  consumer   choices,  but  provides  an  indirect   incenHve  for  companies  to  lower  their  CO2  emissions.

The   Y8+   acknowledges   the   need   to   educate   con-­‐sumers   on   sustainable   food   producHon   and   con-­‐sumpHon.   Therefore   we   stress   the   importance   of  higher   transparency   standards   on   the   global   food  market.   A   need   exists   for   increased   transparency   in  the   food   supply   chain  with   regards   to   the   chemicals  used   to   grow,   process  and   preserve   food,   as  well  as  the  amount   of   CO2  emissions  emi^ed   from   the  field  to   the   retailer.  Moreover   the   Y8+   recommends  that  this  informaHon  be  available  to  the  public.  (P.  43  |  Y8)  „

According   to   the   InternaHonal   Fund   for   Agricultural  Develop-­‐ment,  about  80  per  cent  of  the  food  consumed  in  Asia  and  Sub-­‐Saharan   Africa   is   produced   by   small-­‐scale   farmers.   The  establishment   of   such   a   fund   will   play   an   essenHal   role   in  encouraging  these  farmers  to  move  towards  more  sustainable  producHon  methods.

ENVIRONMENT

11

Y8Y20

“Lea  Kliem

Lea  Kliem

Page 12: Summary of the Y8 and Y20 2013

DEVELOPMENT

12

The  Y8+   is  encouraging  the  teaching  of  social  enter-­‐prise   in   school   curriculums   to   develop   enterprise-­‐neurial  skills  and  will  strive  for  the  establishment  of  a  working  group   in   2013   composed   of  willing  naHons  facilitated  by  UNESCO  and  the  World  Bank  Group  to  advise   local   universiHes   and   terHary   educaHon   on  how   these   values   may   be   (...)   incorporated   into  exisHng  curricula.  (P.  39  |  Y8)  „

We   advocate   for   the   creaHon   of   a   personal   online  profile  system   that  displays  the   commi^ed   amount,  type,   and   received   benefits   per   individual,   while  informing  of  the  aid  source.  The  system  would  allow  for   user   feedback   on   aid   quality   and   quanHty,  provide   monitoring   abiliHes   and   data   collecHon   on  the   effecHveness   of   received   assistance.   (...)   This  plaxorm  should  be  incorporated  into  exisHng  mobile  banking  technology.  (P.  41  |  Y8)„

Schools,  foundaHons  and  NGOs  focus  on  civic,  arHsHc  or  health  educaHon.  This  is  helpful,  yet   it   is  apparent   that   there  is  a  lack  of   financial  educaHon.   Having   an  understanding   for   tangibles,  work  performance,  enterpreneurneurship,  or  the  economic  and  monetary   system   is  necessary   to  feel  empowered  and  realize  that  there  are  a  broad  range  of  opportuniHes  to  lib   oneself  out  of   poverty.   Here,   promoHng   social  enterprise   combines  many  objecHves   at   the   same   Hme:   CreaHng   new   jobs,   having   a  sustainable  purpose  and  eradicaHng  poverty.

Y8Y20“

DonaHng  money   to  projects,   organizaHons  or   foundaHons  is  a  good   deed.   But   how   does  the  financial  contribuHon  make  an  impact   in   terms  of   the  development,   efficiency   and  effecHve-­‐ness?  With  the  above-­‐menHoned  online  system  the  Y8+  offers  an  easily   applicable  soluHon  and  a  supplement   to   the  exisHng  mobile  banking  applicaHons.   In  general,  a  cooperaHon  between  computer   engineers,   development   workers  and  staHsHcians  is  important   to  increase  the  quality   of  useful  mobile  applicaHons  and  design  new  ones  which  affects  developing  communiHes  in  a  posiHve  way  and  facilitates  development  work.

Mina  Saidze

Mina  Saidze

Page 13: Summary of the Y8 and Y20 2013

To   enhance   the   strength   of   Mali’s   regional   and  border  security,  we  shall  allocate  security  assistance  to   Mali’s   regional   neighbours,   pursuant   with   AU  framework  provisions  and  the  Economic  Community  of   West   African   States   (ECOWAS)   defence   and  security   commission,   with   the   explicit   purpose   of  Hghtening  Mali’s  border  security.  (P.  17  |  Y8)

The   recent   conflict   in   Mali   is   not   just   influenced   by   Tuareg  rebels’  pursuit   of  an  independent   state,  but  by  wider  systemic  factors,  springing  from  the  permanent   risk  of  regional  crisis  as  we   see   in   Libya   and   Egypt.   No   country   can   be   treated   in  isolaHon.  Hence,  G8/G20  youths  discussed  in  what  ways  we  can  stabilize   these   variables   and   thereby   allow   for   a   more  prosperous  future   for   the  country   and,   eventually,   the  wider  region.   This  included  the  expansion  of  exisHng   regional  border  security   frameworks,   increased   security   involvement   from  internaHonal  and  regional  bodies  such  as  the  UN   and  AU,   and  enhanced   North-­‐South   reconciliaHon   efforts   via   poliHcal   and  humanitarian  channels.

FOREIGN AFFAIRS

13

We   recognise   that   Libya   is   undergoing   significant  democraHc,   poliHcal,   economic   and   security   re-­‐construcHon.   The   Libyan   people   and   their   govern-­‐ment   face   significant   challenges   in   their   efforts   to  establish  a  peaceful,  secure,  and  prosperous  country.  Foremost   (...)   is   the   need   to   restore   order   and  strengthen   border   security   (...)   and   develop   the  Libyan  internal  security  apparatus.  (P.  16  |  Y8)„

The  Arab  Spring  has  been  an  opportunity,   but  also  a  threat  to  the  same  extent.  As  youths  we  are  in  the  posiHon  to  take  a  lead  in  emphasizing   the  importance  of  a  mulHlateral,  mulH-­‐channel  approach,  indispensible  in  a  world  that  gained  in  complexity  and  in  potenHal  for   cooperaHon,   as  never   before.   In   our   focus  on  post-­‐revoluHon  Libya,  the  new  state,  together  with  regional  and  internaHonal  actors  and  organs,  must  provide  the  firmament  for  reconciliaHon,   covering   physical   security   e.g.   from   mines,  industrial  rehabilitaHon  and  self-­‐sustaining  insHtuHon-­‐building.  

Y8Y20“

MarTn

 Hinkens

MarTn

 Hinkens

Page 14: Summary of the Y8 and Y20 2013

Considering   the   fierce   and   heated   discussions   with   relevant  members  of  the  summit  on  the  use  of  drones  and  its  potenHal  impacts   on   internaHonal   law,   acknowledging   that   current  pracHces  –  be  they  legal  or  illegal  –  can  and  will  have  important  repercussions  on  how  states  will  be  able  to  jusHfy   their  acHon  once  they   have  aqcuired  the  technological  capaciHes  to  do  so,  needs   to   be   seen   as   a   significant   first   step   towards   more  internaHonal  transparency  and  accountability.  

States   are   commi^ed   to   refusing   any   form   of  financial   interacHon   and   transacHons   with   enHHes  and   insHtuHons   involved   with   nuclear   development  for  non-­‐peaceful  purposes.  (P.  31  |  Y8)

Regarding   the   effecHveness   of   exisHng   non-­‐proliferaHon  measures  especially   in  the  case  of  Iran,   the  Y8  underline  with  this  request  that  all  relevant  internaHonal  actors  need  to  act   in  concert   when   it   comes   to   the   financial   insHtuHonal  network  facilitaHng   nuclear   development   for   military   purposes.   UN  sancHons  have  too  oben  lacked  rigorous  implementaHon  by  its  members,   thus  sobening   the  potenHal  economic   impacts  and  contribuHng  to  the  enduring  ineffecHveness  of  such  measures.

DEFENCE

14

Y8Y20

The   panel   acknowledges   the   repercussions   that  present   pracHces  might   have   on   the   future   use   of  drones  regarding  internaHonal  customary  law.  (P.  34  |  Y8)„

„“

Mirk

o  Woitzik

Mirk

o  Woitzik

Page 15: Summary of the Y8 and Y20 2013

The  G8   have  to  act  as  leaders  in  closing  the  gender   gap.  Given  that   the  natural  process   that   leads  to   equal  parHcipaHon  has  proven  too  slow,  it  is  Hme  to  introduce  quotas  in  the  important  sectors.   This   would   not   only   increase   compeHHon,   but   also  encourage  women  to  take  on  leadership  responsibility.  Quotas  should   only   privilege  women  with   the  same  qualificaHons  as  their   male   compeHtors,   thus   invalidaHng   the   argument   that  women  are  being   appointed  to  posiHons  merely   as  a  result  of  their  gender.

Countries   commit   themselves   to   criminalise   trans-­‐plantaHon   of   organs   of   which   the   origin   is   unclear  which   would   be   reported   by   an   internaHonal   task  force  of  health/medical  experts  with  experHse  in  the  idenHficaHon  process  of  organ  donaHon.  (P.  25  |  Y8)

We  need  to  develop  internaHonal  policies  in  order  to  encourage  transparency  and  an  internaHonal  checking-­‐up  process  relaHng  to   idenHficaHon  of   the  origin  of   transplanted   organs.   The  G8  need   to   improve   invesHgaHon   and   regulaHons   need   to   be  stricter.   For   this   it   is   also   crucial   that   all   countries   commit  themselves  to  criminalise  transplantaHon  of  organs  of  which  the  origin  is  unclear.

JUSTICE

15

Y8Y20

The   Y8+   encourages   the   use   of   quotas   to   increase  women's   representaHon   in   policy   related   fields   to  allow   for   the   creaHon   of   new   policies   to   sHmulate  growth  in  gender  equality  in  the  private  sector.  (P.  28  |  Y8)„

Alma  Laiadh

iAlma  Laiadh

i

Page 16: Summary of the Y8 and Y20 2013

Impressions from the Y8

16

It   took   the   Y8   one   week   and   51   pages   to   express   soluHons   and  recommendaHons  in  six  policy  areas.  However,  the  final  document,  which  reads   like  an  agreeable   and   simply   reached  consensus,   is  the   result   of  strong   dedicaHon,   hard   work,   heated   debates   and   last-­‐minute  compromises.   It   was   determined   in   the   middle   of   the   night   aber  

negoHaHons  had  already  officially  ended  for  several  hours.

Only   one   week   aber   the   heads   of   state   of   the   G8   countries   met   in  Northern   Ireland,   the   2013   ediHon   of   the   Y8   was   hosted   in   a   slightly  different   fashion  at  the  Old  Royal  Naval  College  in  London:   150  delegates  from  more  than  18  countries  spent  5  days  discussing  innovaHve  soluHons  

to  the  world's  most  challenging  issues.  When  the  BriHsh  host  organizaHon  decided  not  only  to  invite  the  Y8  but  also  the  Y20  to  London,  it  met  a  huge  challenge  but   also   increased   the   legiHmacy   and   the  significance  of   the  summit.

As  usual,   Policy   InnovaHon   e.V.   sent   the  German   delegaHon,   this  year  

headed  by  Ma~a  Nelles,  the  German  chancellor.  Aber   several  months  of  intensive  preparaHons,  acute  online  pre-­‐negoHaHons,  and  informal  online  communicaHon  with   the   other   delegaHons,   the   pressure  culminated   in  these  five  days  in  London.  Before,  the  German  delegaHon  had  successfully  placed  most  of  its  priority  topics  on  the  agendas  of  each  panel.

The  German  DelegaTon  and  OC  Members  at  the  Y8,  London,  2013

ArTcle  by  Ma]

hias  Kaspe

rs,  P

ress  Delegate  of  th

e  German

 DelegaT

on  to

 the  Y8

 and

 Y20

Page 17: Summary of the Y8 and Y20 2013

Impressions from the Y8

17

Aber   the   opening   ceremony   took   place   on   Monday,   negoHaHons   got  started  early  Tuesday  morning.   Since  the  commi^ees  had  agreed  on  the  order   of   topics   beforehand,   significant   issues   were   discussed   straight  away.  From  the  first  moment  on,  the  German  delegaHon  was  focused  on  

transferring   their   own   ideas,   suggesHons  and   approaches  into   the  final  communiqué   which   served   as   the   concluding   document   of   the  conference,  a  composiHon  that  all  delegates  and  finally  all  heads  of  state  of  all  countries  would  agree  on.  The  German  sherpa,  Irene  Adamski,  urged  her  fellow  delegates  to  consistently   sum  things  up  at  the  end  of  each  day  

of   negoHaHons:   'What   is  crucial?  What  must   not   be  a  part   of   the  final  communiqué,  what  ideas  may  not  be  missing?'

Aber  the  delegates  were  in  negoHaHons  all  day  long  on  Tuesday,  they  had  the  opportunity   to   discover   London  on  Wednesday,   socialize  with  their  fellow  colleagues  and  lay  the  foundaHon  for  conHnuously   fruixul  debates  

on  an  interpersonal  level.  While  this  was  not  the  Hme  for  formal  debates,  it  was  however  used  for   informal  talks  and  for   gaining  others'   trust   and  building  confidence.  Also,  at  the  end  of  each  day   the  German  delegaHon  held   a  short   team  meeHng   to  update  each   other   about   the  process  of  negoHaHons  and  to  discuss  possible  difficulHes  and  challenges.

The   final   communiqué   was   then   agreed   on   Thursday   night.   Standing  outside  aber  a  long  day  of  tough  negoHaHons,  the  locaHon  already  closed  due  to  the  late  hour,   the  heads  of   state  agreed  on  the  final  lines  of  the  document.  On  Friday,  the  summit  was  wrapped  up  by  a  special  gala  dinner  at   what   is   called   the   finest   dining   hall   of   Europe,   the  Painted   Hall   at  

Greenwich  University.  It  was  the  fesHve  closing  ceremony  of  a  week  full  of  innovaHve  ideas,  intercultural  experiences  and  more  than  hundred  young  people  from  all  over  the  world  sharing  a  common  goal.

When  asked  for  drawing  a  personal  conclusion  of  the  negoHaHons  from  a  German   perspecHve,   Alma   Laiadhi,   the   German   Minister   of   JusHce,  

responded:   “Apart   from  few  contested   issues   like  death   sentence   or   the  treatment   of   whistleblowers,   na7onal   interests   rather   came   second,  whereas  one  could  feel  a  certain  atmosphere  to  cooperate  and  to  reach  a  common  goal.   I  think   the  German  delegates  succeeded   in  defending   their  points   against   their   powerful   Western   counterparts   but   also   acted   as  

mediators  between  those  and  rather  reluctant  countries.”

Page 18: Summary of the Y8 and Y20 2013

Impressions from the Y8

18

Later,  when  asked  for  her  personal  highlight,  she  remembered:

“The  breakthrough   in  the  area  of  a  female  quota!  When  it   looked   like  no  consensus  could  be  reached,  I  was  able  to  convince  the  only   objector,  my  fellow  Russian  delegate,  of  the  importance  of  this  issue.”

Further   innovaHve   recommendaHons   can   be   found   in   the   final  communiqué,  among  those  are  for   instance  the  introducHon  of  a  system  similar   to  Erasmus  on  a  global  scale  in  order   to  promote  student  mobility  and   exchanges.   Regarding   Syria,   a   “safety   corridor”   for   civilians   and  refugees   shall   be   established   in   the   border   regions   which   would   be  

recognized  by  all  parHes  and  coordinated  by   the  US  and  Russia.   In  light  of  the   recent   cyber-­‐security   affairs,   the   Y8+   also   called   for   all   states   to  embrace  the  freedom  of  expression  and  informaHon  and  find  a  reasonable  balance  with  naHonal  security.

All  things  considered,  the  final  communiqué  contains  51  pages  of  young,  

innovaHve   and   internaHonally   backed   ideas  and   proposals   for   poliHcal  acHon  which  are  worth  reading.

Asked   for   an   advice   to   future   delegaHons,   Mina   Saidze,   the   German  Mininister   of   Development,   said:   “Never   underes7mate   a   good  prepara7on  and  profound  research!  It   is  always  useful  to  have  facts,  data  

and  examples  of  'best  prac7ces'  at  hand  to  back   up  your  statements.   It  is  equally   crucial   to   use   the  breaks   for   convincing   other   delegates   of   your  proposals  and  thus  influence  the  outcome  of  the  vo7ngs.”

With  this  in  mind,  may  the  upcoming  summit  be  as  successful  as  the  one  in  London.

Late  night  discussions,  Heads  of  State  Panel  at  the  Y8,  London,  2013

Page 19: Summary of the Y8 and Y20 2013

Policy Innovation

Contact Information

19

Policy   InnovaHon  e.V.   is  a  registered  German  non-­‐profit  NGO,   run  mainly  by  German  students,  that  organizes  and  facilitates  the  parHcipaHon  of  the  German  DelegaHon  to  the  Y8   and  Y20  Summit.  Among  a  variety  of  tasks,  Policy   InnovaHon  e.V.   is   responsible   for   the  Germany-­‐wide  recruitment  process,   facilitates   the   selecHon   of   the   candidates   and   prepares   the  DelegaHon   over   a   period   of   four   months   prior   to   the   summit.   The  preparaHon  encompasses  two  workshops  that   include  meeHngs  with  the  office  of  the  German  Sherpa  and  various  Federal  Ministrier  as  well  as  NGO  represen-­‐taHves.   In  addiHon,  Policy   InnovaHon  e.V.   is  acHvely   fundrasing  money  in  order  to  provide  every  parHcipant  with  financial  support  to  help  cover  the  parHcipaHon  fee  and  flight  costs.

Policy  InnovaHon  e.V.c/o  HUMBOLDT-­‐VIADRINA  School  of  GovernanceWilhelmstraße  6710117  Berlinwww.policy-­‐innovaHon.orginfo@policy-­‐innovaHon.org  

Policy  InnovaHon  e.V.VR-­‐Nr.:  VR  28061  BBoard  of  Directors:     Philip  Strothmann,         Vera  Pönsgen       Erdinç  Koç