SUMMARY OF 190th MEETING OF SRC-NCTE and Minutes 2010-13/Minutes... · Web viewMinutes of the 210th Meeting of SRC held at the Conference Hall of NCTE, Bangalore on 22nd-23rd August,

Minutes – 210th Meeting of SRC

22nd-23rd August 2011

SOUTHERN REGIONAL COMMITTEEBANGALORE

Minutes of the 210th Meeting of SRC held at the Conference Hall of NCTE, Bangalore on 22nd-23rd August, 2011

The following members attended the Meeting:-

1. Prof. C. Thangamuthu - Chairman

2. Prof.C.Seshadri - Memer

3. Prof. P.J. Poulose - Member

4 Prof.Vijayalakshmi - Member

5 Prof. V.Sudhakar - Member

6. Sri. Gangadharaiah - Convenor

The following members could not attend the Meeting :-

The members, Prof. Anand.and the Representatives of the Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka.

Kerala, Tamilnadu and U.T’s of Lakshadweep, Pondicherry & Andaman & Nicobar

Islands.

(Gangadharaiah) (C. Thangamuthu)Regional Director, SRC, NCTE Chairman, SRC, NCTE

1



SOUTHERN REGIONAL COMMITTEENATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION

BANGALORE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Minutes of 210 th Meeting of SRC-NCTE

Sl.No.

Brief Description Remarks of SRC

1. Confirmation of Minutes of 209th

Meeting held on 31St July 2011Confirmed

2. Action Taken Report (ATR) on the Minutes of 208th Meeting of SRC

held on 13th – 14th July 2011

Noted

Consideration of Court Cases ( Vol-1 )

Sl.No

CodeCourse

Name of the Institution

State

Remarks of SRC

3.APS04780

D.T.EdSri Lakshmi

Teacher Training Institute,

Tiruvallur.TN

SRI LAKSHMI TEACHER TRAINING INSTITUTE, TIRUVALLUR DISTRICT, TAMILNADU

Sri Lakshmi Educational and Social Trust, Tiruvallur District, Tamilnadu had submitted an application to SRC- NCTE for grant of recognition to Sri Lakshmi Teacher Training Institute, No.4/5, Mohammed Ali 2nd Street, Tiruvallur Town, Tiruvallur District-602001, Tamilnadu for D.T.Ed Course of two years duration with an annual intake of 50 students on 30.12.2005.

The Southern Regional Committee, after considering the report of the visiting team as well as other relevant materials granted recognition to the institution for offering D.T.Ed course with an intake of 50 students vide. Order No. F.SRO/NCTE/D.T.Ed/2006-2007/9720 dated 23.12.2006.

The State Government of Tamilnadu in its letter No. 6987/UI/08-1 dated


2



20.03.2008 forwarded a complaint against 54 institutions (D.T.Ed.) regarding non-maintenance of Norms and Standards as prescribed by NCTE. Sri Lakshmi Teacher Training Institute was also one amongst the 54 institutions. The Complaint of the State Government was placed before SRC in its 157th Meeting held on 23rd-24th April, 2008 and it was decided to issue notice under section 17 to all the 54 institutions. Accordingly, notice under Section 17 had already been issued to the institution on 22.07.2008.

The institution was issued notice u/s 17 on 22.7.2008 on the basis of complaint received from State Government/individual in the state of Tamilnadu. The matter was considered by SRC in its 191st meeting held 20-21st April 2010 and it was decided to issue final showcause notice to the institution to submit the reply within 21 days. Accordingly, final Showcause Notice was issued on 31.5.2010. This office did not receive any reply from the institution so far. The Committee in its 199 th meeting held on 22nd-23rd December 2010 considered the matter and decided to withdraw. Accordingly recognition to the institution was withdrawn recognition on 02.09.2010.

The institution preferred an appeal against SRC’s order dt. 02/09/2010 against the order withdrawing recognition for D.T.Ed course. After perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal affidavit, VT report and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and reverse the SRC’s order dt. 02.09.2010 with direction to the SRC to consider reply of the institution to the show cause notice and take appropriate decision thereafter.

The Committee in its 199th meeting held on 22nd-23rd December 2010 considered the Appellate authority order Dt. 19.11.2010 and decided to issue Show Cause notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly notice was issued to the institution on 03.02.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 02.03.2011.

The committee in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April 2011 has decided to issue Final Show Cause notice to the institution under section 17 of the NCTE Act for the following reason. The specific points of deficiencies pointed by the DTERT Tamil Nadu is that “The TTI is functioning in the Higher Secondary School Campus’. In this regard, the management has to submit a certificate from the DTERT Tamil Nadu that the TTI building is outside the School Campus as claimed by the management.

Accordingly, a final show cause notice dtd. 05.05.2011 was issued to the institution vide no. F.SRO/NCTTE/2010/28467.


3



The institution its reply on. 06.06.2011, stated “that we will submit the certificate from DTERT Tamilnadu (which is not yet given by DTERT) in the next week. This is for your consideration and information”.

Mean while, a court order dtd: 06/07/2011 in WP No. 14764 of 2011 filled by institution. The court has order as follows “the petitioner institution by R1, who is the competent authority under the Act, remains intact as on date and is as much as the case is only at the show cause notice stage, I am of the view that the non-inclusion of the petitioner institution is the list of approved institutions for counselings through single window system for admission to the 1st year D.T.Ed., course for the academic year 2011-12 is not proper. Therefore R2 is directed to include the petitioner institution in the said list, which shall be subject to the final orders that may be passed by the NCTE Notice to R1”.

The SRC considered the Hon’ble court orders and all the relevant documents of the institution and decided to cause inspection at the premises Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. The institution is directed to submit the following within 30 days of the receipt of the notice, duly filled in Questionnaire along with all the necessary documents for land, building approval and completion certificate from a competent Govt. Engineer and other relevant documents along with Demand Draft of Rs.40,000/- inspection fee towards the D.T.Ed course in favour of “The Member Secretary, NCTE” payable at Bangalore.

4. APS09050

B.Ed

Rosammal Memorial College of Education (For Women), Tuticorin

TN

Rosammal Memorial Minority College of Education (For Women) No.85/2C Poopalaraverpuram, Tuticorin – 628001, Tamilnadu.

Rosammal Memorial Minority College of Education (For Women) No.85/2C Poopalaraverpuram, Tuticorin – 628001, TN has submitted an application to the SRC of NCTE for grant of recognition for B.Ed course Dt. 26.9.2007 which was received on 28.9.2007. The application was possesses and the deficie.ncy letter was issued on 10.10.2007 providing 90 days time to submit the documents. Whereas, the institution has not made any reply. Hence, after completion of 90 days, the application file was closed and communicated to the institution vide letter dt. 12.05.2008.

The institution has filed WP 19506 of 2008 before the Hon’ble High court of Madras, wherein the Hon’ble court has directed to consider the application and pass orders on merits within 12 weeks.

Based on the court order a letter was issued to the instituted dt. 15.10.2008 seeking the required documents for further processing of the application. The institution has submitted reply in its letter dt. 31.10.2008. The reply was scrutinized and found that the documents submitted are


4



not complete. A reminder letter was sent to the institution on 1.1.2009.Meanwhile, the institution has filed one more WP 168 of 2008 before the Hon’ble High Court of Madras. The Hon’ble Court has directed SRC to consider the application of the petitioner dt. 26.9.2007 and the compliance report submitted on 31.10.2008. In the 170th Meeting to be held 16th-17th

Feb, 2009 and pass orders on the same in accordance with Law within a period of 8 weeks.

Further, the institution in its letter dt. 31.10.2009, has made a reply to this office reminder letter dt,1.1.2009 . On verification of the documents, it is found that the institution has not submitted land documents for having registered in the name of the institution or trust. Whereas, the encumbrance certificate submitted for the year 1997 shows the name of the institution along with two other individuals, building completion certificate issued by the PWD Engineer for Rosammal Memorial Minority College of Education. Further, the land usage certificate issued for college purpose and the letter has been issued to the Rosammal Memorial Minority College of Education (Women).

As per the directions of the Hon’ble court, the application filed dt. 28.9.2007 and the compliance of the institution dt. 31.10.2008 along with original file, Court order, letter dt. 30.10.2008 along with documents were placed before SRC in its 170th meeting held on 16-17 Feb. 2009 and SRC decided to reject the application for the following reason.

The institution has not produced documentary evidence for possessing land in the name of the institution or trust.

Accordingly a refusal order was issued to the institution on 13.4.2009.

Refusal order in respect of Rosammal Memorial Minority College of Education, Tuticorin, Tamilnadu for B.Ed course was issued on 13.4.2009.

Aggrieved by the refusal order of SRC, the institution preferred an appeal to NCTE-Hqrs. The appellate authority in its order F.No.89-379/2009-Appeal/99399 dated 7.8.2009 confirms the order appealed against.

A court notice was received in W.P. no. 24907 of 2009 filed by Rosammal Memorial Minority College of Education enclosing a copy of writ petition filed by the institution. In response to the writ petition, a letter was issued on 14.12.2009 to Shri. M.T. Arunan, Advocate enclosing a brief of the case and a copy of appeal order dated 7.8.2009.

Shri. M.T. Arunan, Advocate has forwarded a court order on 23.12.2009 in W.P. No. 24907 of 2009 dated 18.12.2009 filed by the institution. The


5



Hon’ble court has ordered as follows;“This writ petition is filed for the issue of a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to pass orders on the petitioner’s appeal dated 16.4.2009.

On notice, the Learned Counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 has submitted that within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the petitioner’s appeal dated 16.4.2009 will be disposed of.Recording the above submission made by the Learned Counsel for the respondents 1 and 2, this writ petition is closed. No costs”.

A copy of written representation addressed to the Member Secretary, NCTE, New Delhi has been received from the institution on 29.12.2009 enclosing a copy of court order in W.P. No. 24907 of 2009 and Lease Deed. A copy of the same court order was received from the petitioner’s advocate on 29.12.2009.

A letter dated 1.1.2010 was issued to the Member Secretary, NCTE, New Delhi informing that the Hon’ble High Court of Madras has passed a judgment on 18.12.2009 in the above writ petition directing the 1st

respondent (Member Secretary, NCTE-New Delhi) to pass orders on the petitioner’s appeal dated 16.4.2009 within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. A copy of the court order has enclosed with the letter for direction in the matter. So far this office has not received any reply from the NCTE-Hqrs., New Delhi.

Petitioner’s Counsel Shri. P. Munusamy forwarded a Contempt Petition no. 193 of 2010 against W.P. No. 24907 of 2009 which was received on 3.3.2010 states that the matter is posted on 11.3.2010 for your appearance.

Shri. Arunan, Advocate has forwarded a copy of writ petition no. 4419 of 2010 filed by Rosammal Memorial Minority College of Education against NCTE. The matter came up on 3.3.2010 and the same is adjourned to 10.3.2010. W.P.No. 4419 of 2010 filed by the above mentioned institution received on 12.3.2010 states that“……..it is humbly prayed that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus or any other Writ, order or direction in the nature of a writ calling for the records from the first respondent relating to the impugned order in F.No.89-379/2009-Appeal order dated 7.8.2009, quash the same and further direct the first and second respondent to grant recognition to the petitioner institution to start a one year B.Ed Degree course from the academic year 2010-2011 without insisting on NOC from the 3rd

Respondent and pass any other further or other orders this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice”.


6



A court order in W.P. No. 44815 of 2002 has been received on 15.3.2010. The court order states as “……seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. Permission is granted, and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn”.

Shri M.T. Arunan, advocate has forwarded a letter dated 11.3.2010 enclosing a copy of additional affidavit of the petitioner in W.P. no. 4419 of 2010. In the affidavit the petitioner states that has filed the afore said writ petition for Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records from the 1st Respondent in F.No.89/379/2009 appeal dated 7.8.2009, quash the same and further direct the first and second respondent to grant recognition to the petitioner institution.

The petitioner humbly states that the only ground on which the Appellant Authority rejected the appeal was that the petitioner has not submitted the land documents before the original authority at the time of main application. The appellate authority had taken a stand that the land documents were submitted subsequently.

The petitioner humbly states that he is willing to re-submit a fresh application for recognition within one week from today and this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to receive the applicant and pass orders within prescribed time limit and thus render justice.

The above said institution has re-submitted the application in-triplicate for B.Ed course on 17.3.2010 along with D.D. of Rs. 40,000/- and DD. Rs. 1000/- along with court order in W.P.No. 4419 of 2010, which states as follows; “…….In view of the said submissions, this writ petition is disposed of granting permission to the petitioner to submit a fresh application for recognition within one weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the second respondent is directed to receive the same and pass necessary orders in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the application from the petitioner”.

The file was forwarded to NCTE-Hqrs for further consideration. The appellate authority vide order dated 24.09.2010 reversed the order of the SRC dt. 04.05.2010 with the direction to process the fresh application on merits, by treating the application for establishment of a minority educational institution of Christian minority. The institution if recognized on merit, would obtain a minority status certificate from the concerned authority of the State Government and would abide by its obligation as a minority institution.

The institution vide letter dated 05.10.2010 submitted its written


7



representation. The institution has submitted application for B.Ed course on 12.10.2010 but not submitted in on-line mode. SRC considered the appeal order in its 197th meeting held on 13th-14th October 2010 and decided to process the application. The documents dated 05.10.2010 & 12.10.2010. The Committee also considered Appellate order Dt. 24.09.2010 and all the relevant documentary evidences in its 198th

meeting held on 24th-26th November 2010 and it was decided to serve Showcause Notice on the following deficiencies.

The institution has not submitted application on-line.

As per affidavit submitted on 12.10.2010, total area of land is 13680.774 sq.ft which comes to 1270.91 sq.mtrs. As per NCTE norms regulations, total land area required for B.Ed college is 2500 sq.mtrs.

As per affidavit, Plot No/ Khasra No, where the college is proposed to start is not mentioned.

The institution has submitted two lease deeds (private) dt. 3.10.2007 & 21.04.2009 for a period of 35 years & 29 years in the name of Rosammal Memorial Minority College of Education (Women), which is not acceptable as per NCTE Regulation.

Land usage certificate is submitted in Tamil version, English version to be submitted.

Copy of Building Plan submitted is not approved by Government Competent Authority. As per Building Plan total built up space is 2647.04 sq.mtrs at D.No.85/2C, Boopalarayerpuram in Sy.No.5842, Ward No.4, Block No.49, Tuticorin. But Building Plan submitted with initial application is approved by Government.

As per the norms, the institution should possess own land and own permanent building complete in all respects, on the date of application.

FDR of Rs. 300000/- submitted towards reserve fund is of not joint account. FDR of Rs. 500000/- towards endowment is not submitted.

Building Completion Certificate is not submitted.

Accordingly show cause notice was issued to the institution on 06.01.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 10.01.2011. From the original file of the institution, it is observed that:

In the initial application dated 26.9.2007 as well as the application re-submitted in obedience to the court order, the institution in the column


8



2.1, against the name of the Society/Trust has mentioned as “Individual Management”.

Eligibility Criteria in Para 4(4) of NCTE regulation 2009, states as “Self financed educational institutions established and operated by ‘not for profit’ Societies and Trusts registered under the appropriate laws” can apply for starting an Institution.

The institution in its reply dated 10.1.2011 admitted that the land is in the name of the individual and the name of the Correspondent is Shri. A.A.J. Ashokar. The correspondent has the lands in his name and the same is leased to the institution. Since the title owner is the correspondent of the institution and the institution is run by an individual, the same is well within the rules of NCTE Regulations. Only lease from third parties are not acceptable but in the present case, the land is owned only by the correspondent and the institution is run by the individual.

2. As per lease deed the building is in lease. “As per Regulation clause 4 of 2009 the college proposed to be set up by an individual is not eligible to do so”.

The institution has submitted Private Lease Deed dated 3.10.2007 for a period of 35 years at Sy.No.1210/1A1, 1A2, 1B with total extent of 4 acres 34 cents

Private Lease Deed dated 21.4.2009 for a period of 29 years at Sy.No.5842 part, 5844, 5844/1A1A, 1B, 5847 part with total extent of 1 acres 12.50 cents and RCC building with 2 floors constructed thereon bearing door no.85/2C

As per NCTE regulation 2009 para 8 of sub Para 7(i) states as follows;

“No institution shall be granted recognition under these Regulations unless the institution or society sponsoring the institution is in possession of required land on the date of application. The land free from all encumbrances could be either on ownership basis or on lease from Government or Government institutions for a period of not less than 30 years. In cases where under relevant State or Union Territory laws the maximum permissible lease period is less than 30 years, the State Government or Union Territory Administration law shall prevail. However, no building shall be taken on lease for running any teacher training course”.

3. The institution in its reply admitted that the land and building is owned by the correspondent of the institution and he runs the institution and it not by any agency, trust or society. The institution is run by an


9



individual namely, the correspondent and the entire building and land is owned by the correspondent and not by the third parties. The correspondent has given the building and land by way of lease to the institution for a long period. The building is also completed and the completion certificate dt.23.1.09 clearly shows that the entire building consisting of more than 2500 sq.mtrs is already completed. FDR of Rs. 3 lakhs submitted is not in joint account.

The committee after going through the written reply of the institution vide letter dt. 10.01.2011 for the show cause notice issued dt. 06.01.2011, refused to grant recognition of the institution for the B.Ed course for the following deficiencies still persisting:

As per the affidavit submitted the land area is only 13680.774 sq.ft, which is inadequate for the B.Ed course as per the NCTE norms. The minimum required land is 2500 sq.meters.

The institution has submitted two private lease deeds, which is not in accordance with the NCTE regulations. As per the regulations, the land must be on ownership basis or leased govt. land; no private lease is permissible.

As per the decision of SRC in its 200th meeting held on 20th and 21st

January, 2011 a refusal order was issued to the Rosammal Memorial Minority College of Education, Tuticorin, Tamilnadu on 3.3.2011 for B.Ed course.

The institution submitted application with D.D. of Rs. 40,000 and a court order dated 6.4.2011 in W.P. No. 6188 of 2011 filed by Rosammal Memorial Minority College of Education, Tuticorin District, Tamilnadu, the court has directed that “……however liberty is granted to the petitioner to take appropriate steps for transferring the lands in the name of the institution and thereafter make necessary application to the authorities concerned under the Act by complying with the various requirements and if such application is made, it is for the second respondent to pass orders on merits and in accordance with law. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that after taking necessary steps, application will be made within four weeks. It is made clear that on such application being made, the second respondent shall take decision expeditiously, in the manner known to law”

The matter was placed before SRC in its 204th meeting held on 27th and 28th April, 2011. The Committee considered the matter and decided to process the application on submission of original application and related supporting documents as per the regulations within four weeks from the date of confirmation of the minutes.


10



As per decision of SRC, the application was processed and the following deficiencies were found;

1. As per the new regulation the application was not submitted on line mode.

2. As per the new regulation the application should submit 1st October, 2011

3. The institution has not submitted Building Completion certificate.4. The institution has not submitted Land use certificate.5. The English version of land document is registered on 11.4.2011.6. Approved building plan submitted is not clear.

Meantime, a letter from NCTE-Hqrs. received on 24.5.2011 stated that the Hon’ble Court in W.P. No. 6188 of 2011 filed by Rosammal Memorial Minority College of Education, whereby the Hon’ble court directed petitioner to submit the application within a period of 4 weeks for fresh consideration i.e. 25.5.2011. After examining the court order in consultation with the Regulation Section, the submission of applications would strictly be in accordance with the Regulation in vogue. Hence, the court direction are like to challenge before the Division Bench.

Accordingly, a letter to the advocate was sent on 2.6.2011 with the request to file an appeal against the above court directions immediately before the Division Bench in the matter.

Shri. K. Ramakrishna Reddy, Advocate in its letter dated 4.6.2011 stated that in the above matter by order dated 6.4.2011, the Hon’ble High Court has upheld the action of the NCTE. The only direction given to the petitioner is to submit fresh application after complying with the necessary requirements. The institution can submit fresh application by satisfying all the requirements as per the norms existing as on to-day. If such application is submitted and complied with all the requirements, you can consider and pass necessary orders or you can reject the application. Nothing more in the said order and no positive direction has been given. Hence the question of filing appeal does not arise. The institution being a minority, they can apply any time but you can consider only in accordance with the law existing as on the date of disposal of the application. The date of application is immaterial only law existing on the date of disposal shall apply.

The SRC in its 206th meeting held on 09-10 June 2011 noted the points and decided to inform the Head Quarters about the legal opinion of the Advocate; with a request for further direction in the matter. Accordingly, a letter dt.06.07.2011 was sent to NCTE, Hqrs and again a reminder letter


11



was issued on 16.08.2011. The reply from NCTE, Hqrs is awaited.

In the meantime, the institution has submitted a letter on 25.07.2011 and has re-submitted the following documents:

1. Land Title2. Building Completion Certificate3. Land Use Certificate4. English version of registered on 11.04.20115. Approved Building Plan (clear copy)

Further, a duly singed counter affidavit has been sent to the advocate on 03.08.2011.

The institution has submitted letter on 19.08.2011 by enclosing the judgment dt.17.08.2011 which reads as under:

The second respondent is directed to consider all aspects including the compliance report submitted by the petitioner dated 25.07.2011 and communicate the decision to the petitioner within a period of one week from today.

The writ petition is disposed of with above direction. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

The committee has decided to reject the application on the following grounds:

As per Para 5 (3) of NCTE Regulations, 2009, the application must be essentially submitted electronically through on-line mode available on the website of NCTE. But, the application has not been submitted on on-line mode as required under said regulations.

In view of the above reasons, in the eye of law there is no valid application before the SRC, NCTE. Since, it is mandatory requirement and SRC cannot act contrary to the statutory regulations, the application is hereby rejected.

However, the institution can submit fresh application as per the regulations on or before 30.9.2011 for academic 2012-2013.

The present application of Rosammal Memorial Minority College of Education (For Women) N. 85/2C, Poopalaraverpuram, Tuticorin-628001, Tamilnadu for B.Ed course in terms of section 14(3) (b) of NCTE Act. 1993 is rejected.

5. APS07938LNR College of Education, H.No. 5-45,Paipad Village and Post, Waddepally Mandal, Alampur, Mahabubnagar- 509 126, Andhra


12



B.Ed

LNR College of Education,

Mahabubnagar.

AP

Pradesh.

motati Nagi Reddy Memorial Educational Society. -45,Paipad village and Post, Waddepally Mandal, Alampur, Mahabubnagar- 509 126, Andhra Pradesh has submitted in the Southern Regional Committee of NCTE for grant of recognition to LNR College of Education, H.No. 5-45,Paipad village and Post, Waddepally Mandal, Alampur, Mahabubnagar- 509 126, Andhra Pradesh for B.Ed Course on 13.01.2006

Application of the Institution was processed and deficiency letter dt.17.02.07 was sent to the Institution communicating therewith the deficiencies and directing therewith for removal of the same within 90 days from the date of issue of deficiency letter. The institution had not replied to the deficiency letter even expiry of stipulated period of 90 days.

The matter of all such institutions was considered by the SRC in its 135 th meeting held on 7th and 9th June 2007 after careful consideration of all the aspects vis-avis regulatory provisions, the SRC decided to close the file and communicate the applicant institution to this effect.

Accordingly letter dt.12.07.07 was sent to the Institution intimating about the directions of SRC that the application submitted for grant of teacher education course has been treated incomplete, therefore the same is closed and that no further correspondence whatsoever will be entertained in this regard. However, to seek recognition for any teacher education course including the one which this application was submitted, they were advised to make fresh application in the prescribed format.

LNR College of Education, Mahabubnagar- 509 126, Andhra Pradesh has filed a court case vide Writ petition No. 3765 of 2011 in the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad verses – The Government of Andhra PradeshSRC and NCTE-SRC as first and second respondents respectively against the above SRC order dt.12.07.2007.

The Hon’ ble High Court has passed an order dt.26.04.2011 in WP No. 3765 of 2011 as under:

The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not conducting the inspection and not granting recognition for establishment of the College of Education at Paipad village, Wadepally Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District. It is the case of the petitioners that they filed an application for setting up B.Ed College at Palpad village on 29.12.2006.Howeve the same was returned on the ground that numerous deficiencies were found in the said college. The petitioner, after removing the said deficiencies, filed a fresh application on 28.12.2007. The grievance of the petitioner is that the said application is not being considered by the respondents till date. The petitioner has also submitted a representation on


13



18.11.2010 before the 2nd Respondent, but the same has not been considered as yet. After hearing the learned Counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the representation dt. 18.11.201 because the petitioner has filed its earlier application on 29.12.2006 i.e prior to coming into force of the policy decision 07.01.2009. The respondents are directed to consider the application of the petitioner, expeditiously, preferably, within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. No. order as to costs.

The Court order along with file placed before SRC for direction/ decision The Institution has stated to have filed a representation dt. 18.11.10 wherein it is mentioned that fresh application is resubmitted on 28.12.2007 clearing deficiencies communicated on 17.02.2007. This resubmission of fresh application is well after closure of the case vide letter dt.12.07.07 for non compliance of deficiencies with stipulated time as per NCTE regulations

The Committee considered the matter and decided to process the application on submission of copy of original application dt. 28.12.2007 and related supporting original documents as per the regulations.

As per decision of Regional Committee a letter was issued to resubmit the application on 06.07.2011.

The Committee considered the written representation submitted on 21/07/2011 & 18/09/2011 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice for the following:

The sale deed of the land was registered on 10/05/2007, whereas the application submitted by the institution for consideration of recognition to B.Ed course was on 13/01/2006. As per the NCTE norms and Regulations, land should be available in the name of the institution/trust before the date of application.

Building completion certificate from competent Govt Engineer is not submitted.

Upto date Encumbrance certificate not submitted.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available, with no further notice.


14



6. SRCAPP274

M.Ed

Sri Andal Educational

Cultural Society, Rangareddy.

AP

Sri. Andal Educational Cultural Society, 5-67, Pedda Amberpet Road, Village- Kuntloor, Post-Hayathnagar, Hyderabad, District- Rangareddy- 5600028, Andhra Pradesh.Sri. Andal Educational Cultural Society, 5-67, Pedda Amberpet Road, Village- Kuntloor, Post-Hayathnagar, Hydrabad, District- Rangareddy-560028, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Gandhian College of Master Education, 5-67, Village- Kuntloor, Post-Hayathnagar, Rangareddy East, Hydereabad, District- Rangareddy-5600028, Andhra Pradesh for M.Ed. Course of One year duration under Section 14 (1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 05.10.2010.The application was processed and the deficiency letter was issued to the Institution on 02.02.2011. The Institution not submitted reply of deficiency letter.The SRC considered the matter in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April, 2011 and on careful perusal of the original file of the Institution and other related documents, NCTE Act 1993, Regulations and guidelines from time to time laid on the table, written representation from the Institution , the Regional Committee decided to reject the application on the following grounds:-The Institution has not replied to the deficiency letters even after a lapse of Stipulated time. The application of Gandhian College of Master Education, 5-67, Village- Kuntloor, Post- Hayathnagar, Rangareddy East, Hyderabad, District- Rangareddy-500028, Andhra Pradesh for permission to M.Ed. Course is hereby rejected. And the original FDR No-289494 dated 07.04.2011 of Rs 5 Lakhs issued by Andhra Bank and the original FDR No-289495 dated 07.04.2011 of Rs 3 Lakhs issued by Andhra Bank was returned on 25.05.2011.The Institution approached directly to the Honorable High Court in W.P.No. 20733. Whereas the Honorable High Court has directed that “Having regard to the fact that the explanation was on record at least before the impugned order was passed, the respondent is directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law and communicate the same to the petitioner”.Court ordered along with the original bill placed before SRC court directions.

The Committee considered the Hon’ble High Court order and reply of the institution Dt. 28.04.2011 was duly considered along with all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice for the following:

National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) Accreditation minimum of with ‘B’ Grade Certificate not


15



submitted.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not refused and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the refusal of recognition, based on the records available, with no further notice.

7. APS03777

D.Ed

Arjun College of Education, Hyderabad

AP

Arjun College of Education, 601, Girishikhara Residency, Hiltop Colony, Khaairtabad, Hyderabad-500004, Andhra Pradesh Managed by Scient Educational Society No. 601, Girisikara Residency, Hiltop Coloney, Khairtabad, Hyderabad-500004. File No. APS03777. Course-D.Ed.Scient Educational Society No. 601, Girisikara Residency, Hiltop Coloney, Khairtabad, Hyderabad-500004 had submitted an application seeking grant of recognition for starting D.Ed course to Arjun College of Education, 601, Girishikhara Residency, Hiltop Colony, Khaairtabad, Hyderabad-500004, Andhra Pradesh on 30.1.2004. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution vide dated 26.08.2008 directing to submit the document within a period of 90 days as per regulation7(1) of the NCTE Regulation 2007.

SRC in its 135th meeting held on 07th -08th June 2007 decided to treat the application which have not submitted compliance’s as closed after the expiry of 90 days of time as per the regulations of NCTE 2005. A letter dated 31.10.2008 has been received from NCTE HQ clarifying that all such cases where letter of deficiency has been issued but no reply has been received from the concern institution within 90 days may also be closed in terms of section 7(1) of the NCTE Regulations.

As per direction SRC and NCTE Hq application was closed and order was issued on 03.03.2009 to the applicant institution. The Institution has approached to Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh in writ petition no. 20174/2011. The Hon’ble High Court has directed as under:-

“After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider the aforementioned application in the light of the representations expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. It is made clear that in case a decision has already been taken and application of the petitioner stands disposed of one way


16



or the other, no fresh order need be passed and the decision taken shall be communicated to the petitioner. No costs.

The matter was placed in 209th meeting of SRC, wherein the SRC considered the matter and decided to send a letter to advocate. (However the minutes of the same not finalized) . As per direction of SRC a letter was issued to our advocate on 05.08.2011. In response to our letter dated 05.08.2011 our legal counsel has sent reply vide letter dated 06.08.2011(SRC diary no. 107841) as under:-

“ No –appeal is required in the following cases and the SRC shall pass necessary orders as per directions of the Hon’ble High Court following the NCTE, Act and Regulation to avoid contempt proceedings. “

Note: In this case has been closed already in accordance with NCTE Regulations as the time limit specified in the NCTE Regulation and already communicated to the petitioner.

The brief history of the matter along with original file placed before SRC for direction/decision.

The Court Orders were duly considered by the committee. It is unfortunate that the institution has sought to misinform/mislead the Hon’ble Court stating that the said application was refused/closed/rejected on the ground of the State Govt policy to ban starting of New institutions. The actual facts lies in

1/ non-reply to the deficiency letter.2/ Non-removal of deficiencies pointed in the deficiency letter.

Accordingly, Hon’ble High Court orders were duly considered. The committee decided to communicate to the institution that, as the application was already considered and disposed for non-compliance of deficiency letter Dt. 24.12.2008. As the application of institution was already disposed on 22.04.2009, no application is pending with SRC.

The application of Arjun College of Education, Andhra Pradesh on 30.12.2004 for D.Ed course is rejected.

Copy of the order be sent to the institution.

8. SRCAPP242

B.Ed

Gowthami Educational Society, NO. 7-25-21, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari-534101, Andhra Pradesh was submitted an application on 28.09.2010 for seeking recognition of B.Ed Course for the session 2011-12.


17



Gowthami Educational

Society, West Godavari.

AP

In order to regulate the growth of teacher education at all levels, it has been decided inter- alia in consultation with the State Government/Uts, not to further recognize / permit institution for conduct of following teacher training courses for the academic session 2010-2011 in the State of Andhra Pradesh indicated below:

Andhra Pradesh – B.Ed., D.Ed.,Public Notice in Times of India dated 29.07.2010 refers in this regard. Therefore, the application submitted by the institution for B.Ed course was returned along with Demand Draft bearing Nos. 247854 & No.247855 dated 18.09.2010 for Rs. 40100/- & Rs.1000/- respectively.

The institution has approached to Hon’ble High Court in Writ Petition no. 10748/2011 without appeal to NCTE Head Quarters in the matter of Gowthamie Educational Society Vs State of Andhra Pradesh and Regional Director, SRC, NCTE. In this Writ petition the Hon’ble High court has ordered as under:-

“When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue involved in this writ petition is similar to the one in W.P. NO. 1320/2011, which was disposed of by this court on 28.01.2011 where under the impugned proceedings were set aside the respondents were directed to consider the application of the petitioner afresh by treating the said application for the academic year 2011-12 and pass appropriate orders.

Since the issue involved in this writ petition is similar to the one in W.P. NO. 1320 of 2011, which was disposed of on 28.01.2011 as above, following the said order this writ petition is disposed of setting aside the proceedings issued by 1st respondent vide F.SRO/NCTE/2009/2010/21565 dated 29.09.2010 and directing the respondents to consider the application of the petitioner afresh by treating the said application for the academic year 2011-12 and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight weeks from today. No order as to costs”.

Brief fact along with court order placed before SRC for direction in the matter.

The committee decided to arrange to file an Appeal against the orders of Hon’ble High Court of Hyderabad immediately and also to arrange for getting the judgment stayed with immediate effect, without waiting for confirmation of minutes.As per direction of SRC a letter was issued to our advocate on 27.06.2011 and reminder on 29/07/2011 with request to file an appeal as per direction of SRC. In response to this office letter dated 29.07.2011 our


18



advocate has suggested as under:-“the above writ petition in which contempt case has been filed,

pass necessary orders as per NCTE Act and regulations on the institution representation dated 05.05.2011, which has received by SRC on 25.05.2011, the Hon’ble High court passed orders to consider institution application and pass orders as per NCTE Regulation, citing the ban imposed by the Andhra Pradesh Govt. which was published in times of India on27.07.2011 and following the Hon’ble supreme court decision in NCTE CASE in 2011, the representation of the institution can be returned take immediate action”.

Note:- In this case in view of the ban imposed for new application for B.Ed and D.Ed (except for minority institutions) vide public notice dated 27/07/2010 the application cannot be considered as the institution is not a minority institution as the earlier order are to be reiterated citing the ban and the supreme court order in in Civil Appeal NO. 1125-1128/ 2011 in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidalaya and ors where NCTE Regulation & Act are to be adhere to in all matters of the teacher education institution.

The Court Orders were duly considered. It is unfortunate that the institution has sought to misinform/mislead the Hon’ble Court stating that the said application was refused/closed/rejected on the ground that the institution is Ineligible to apply as there is a ban for starting of B.Ed and D.Ed courses in the State of AndhraPradesh. Further, institution is not eligible to apply for the course, as it is not a Minority institution.

Accordingly, Hon’ble High Court Order was duly considered. The committee has decided to inform the institution that the institution is ineligible to apply as per the ban imposed for new application for B.Ed and D.Ed (Except for minority institutions) vide public notice dated 27/07/2010 the application cannot be considered as the institution is not a minority institution as the earlier order are to be reiterated citing the ban and the supreme court order in Civil Appeal NO. 1125-1128/ 2011 in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidalaya and others where NCTE Regulation & Act are to be adhere to in all matters of the teacher education institution.

The writ petition in which contempt case has been filed, pass necessary orders as per NCTE Act and regulations on the institution representation Dt. 05.05.2011, which has received by SRC on 25.05.2011, the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh passed orders to consider the institution application and pass orders as per NCTE Regulations, citing the ban imposed by the Andhra Pradesh Govt. which was published in the Times of India on 27.07.2011 and


19



following the Hon’ble Supreme Court decision in NCTE case in 2011, the representation of the institution can be returned to take immediate action.

The said matter was placed in 210th Meeting of SRC held on 22nd-23rd

Aug 2011. The committee considered the matter and decided that the institution is ineligible to apply, as there is a ban on B.Ed course as per the Public Notice for the session 2011-12. The application cannot be considered, as the institution is not a minority institution.

Therefore the application Gowthami Educational Society, West Godawari, Andhra Pradesh for B.Ed course in rejected.

9. APS09143

D.EI.Ed

Master’s College of Elementary

Teacher Education, West

Godavari.

AP

Master’s College of Elementary Teacher Education, Near Gowthami Solvents, Tetali – Tanuki , Andhra Pradesh managed by Krishnaveni Educational Society, C/o of Srinivasa Blood Bank, Near Railway gate,Tanaku 534 211 West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh

Krishnaveni Educational Society, C/o of Srinivasa Blood Bank, Near Railway gate,Tanaku 534 211 West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh to the Southern Regional Committee of NCTE for grant of recognition to Master’s College of Elementary Teacher Education, Near Gowthami Solvents, Tetali – Tanuki , Andhra Pradesh for D.Ed Course on 03.12.2007.Application of the Institution was processed and deficiency letter dt.25.01.08 was issued to the institution. In the deficiency letter it is mentioned about the period of 90 days time given to submit written representation along with all required documents and also informed that in case of any deficiencies stated above still remaining and not removed within 90 days time, no extension of time will be granted and any submissions received after 90 days will be treated as invalid . A reminder was also sent on 01.04.08 to set right the deficiencies One more letter dt.07.07.08 was sent to the Institution for Non compliance of the deficiency letter within 90 days period informing the institution about the deficiency letter dt. 25.01.08, reminder letter dt.01.04.08 sent and expiry of stipulated period of 90 days. Inspite of all that compliance is not made by the institution. Consequent upon the direction of the SRC the application submitted for grant of teacher education course has been treated incomplete. Therefore the same was closed. Accordingly closure order was issued on 07.07.08Krishnaveni Educational Society, Andhra Pradesh has filed a Court case vide Writ petition No. 9903 of 2011 in the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad verses – NCTE- SRC and Principal Secretary, The State of Andhra Pradesh(SE Genl-ii) department as first and second respondents respectively against the above SRC order dt.07.07.2007. Without approaching to Appeal in NCTE-Hqrs under


20



Section 18 of NCTE Act. Hon’ ble High Court has passed an order dt.25.04.2011 in WP No. 9903 of 2011 as under:-The complaint of the petitioner is with regard to the policy of the State of Andhra Pradesh in not permitting recognition of private B.Ed/D.Ed/ private physical education / private language pandit training colleges as communicated under the letter dt07.01.2009 addressed to the National Council for Teacher Education. Acting thereupon, vide proceeding dt 07.07.2008 the Council for Teacher Education rejected the name of the petitioner- Institution for grant of recognition to D.Ed course. The petitioner seeks a consequential direction to National Council for Teacher Education to grant recognition for the said course forthwith. The matter is squarely covered by the judgment, dt. 16.12.2009 in W.P No. 6712 of 2009, whereby a learned judge of this court held that the power of the state Government to review policy as to the necessity or otherwise of according permission to establish institutions. The learned judge observed that the right that accrues to such colleges could not be taken away on account of subsequent change of policy.In terms of the aforesaid decision, the writ petition is disposed of directing the National Council for Teacher Education to consider the petitioner’s case for granting permission for commencing D.Ed Course independently and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with lat , as expeditiously as possible No Order as to the Costs. The Order of the Hon’ble High Court order along with file placed before SRC for direction/ decisionThe Present case is not covered under orders in WP 6712 / 2009 which is regarding cases closed due to changing policy decisions.In this case as per records the application is closed for non reply deficiencies vide letter dtd.07.07.08. The committee decided in 206th meeting of SRC to arrange to file an Appeal against the orders of Hon’ble High Court of Hyderabad, immediately and also to arrange for getting the judgment stayed with immediate effect, without waiting for confirmation of minutes. As per direction of the SRC a letter was issued to the legal counsel on 27.07.11 to obtain copy of writ petition from Hon’ble High court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad. In response to this office letter dated 27.07.11 our advocate has suggested as under:- “If application of the institution referred in writ petition is pending with NCTE pass orders as per NCTE Act, regulations and following Hon’ble supreme court decision in NCTE Vs Shyam Shiksha Prashikshan Sanstahen and others, if NCTE passed order earlier to filling of the writ petitions and if no application is pending with NCTE then no order are required to be passes.The supreme court has passed in the judgement in Civil Appeal NO. 1125-1128/ 2011 in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidalaya and ors before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India as under:-


21



“ An institution is not entitled to recognition unless it fulfils the conditions specified in various clauses of the Regulations. The Council is directed to ensure that in future no institution is granted recognition unless it fulfils the conditions laid down in the Act and the Regulations and the time schedule fixed for processing the application by the Regional Committee and communication of the decision on the issue of recognition it strictly adhered to.Hence a letter was issued to our legal counsel on 05.08.2011 with request to inform to Hon’ble High court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad that matter would be placed before next SRC meeting and to defend the case in the interest of NCTE and to avoid the contempt case.This case closed on 07.07.2008.

Reopening of closed case is against NCTE Regulations as well as Supreme Court the judgement in Civil Appeal NO. 1125-1128/ 2011 in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidalaya and others.

The Court Orders were duly considered. It is unfortunate that the institution has sought to misinform/mislead the Hon’ble Court stating that the said application was refused/closed/rejected on the ground of the State Govt policy to ban starting of New institutions.

The actual facts lies in

1/ non-reply to the deficiency letter.2/ Non- removal of deficiencies pointed out in deficiency letter.

The committee decided to inform the institution that the rejection of the application was on the ground that the institution had not replied within the stipulated time for the deficiency letter issued and ban policy was not the reason for refusal.

The application of Master’s College of Elementary Teacher Education, Andhra Pradesh for D.Ed course is hereby rejected. In the light of Supreme Court Appeal No. 1125-1128/2011 in the matter of Bhamwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidalaya and others where NCTE regulation & act are to be adhered to in all matters of the teachers education institution.

10. APS08049

B.Ed

Sri Venkateshwara

college of

Nandu Educational Society, Nizambad district, Andhra Pradesh has applied for grant of recognition to Sri Venkateshwara college of Education,h.no.5-7-312, Sri Ram Nagar colony, Kamareddy, Nizamabad- 503 111 Andhra Pradesh for B.Ed Course of One year duration on 28.12.2006.

The application was scrutinized and inspection was conducted on 30.08.2007. VT reports were placed before SRC in its 145th SRC Meeting


22



Education, Nizamabad.

AP

held on 16th and 18th October 2007. The committee after considering the original file, VT report as well as other relevant materials furnished by the Institution, felt that the Institution does not fulfill the requirement and decided to issue notice.

Accordingly notice was issued on 30.10.07. The Institution submitted its reply to the notice vide letter dtd. 06.11.07 to SRC-NCTE. The said representation of the Institution as well as other documents and materials submitted by the Institution along with the VTR and Videography were again duly considered by the Southern Regional Committee in its 149 th

meeting held on 13th and 14th December 2007 which came to the conclusion that recognition permission to the said institution be refused for the following reasons. The institution is housed in commercial complex and not suitable of B.Ed course.The space is not adequate for the proposed B.Ed course.The books in the library are not adequate.

Accordingly, recognition of Sri Venkateshwara college of Education,h.no.5-7-312, Sri Ram Nagar colony, Kamareddy, Nizamabad- 503 111 Andhra Pradesh was refused vide order dtd.04.01.2008. The Institution preferred an appeal in the NCTE Hqrs, as per the directions of Hqrs the original file was sent for appeal. NCTE,Hqrs vide order dtd 10.07.2008 rejected the appeal and confirmed the SRC order appealed against.

Nandu Educational Society, Andhra Pradesh filed a Court case vide Writ Petition No. 13588 of 2011 in the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh Versus NCTE-SRC and Secretary School Education Department, Govt. of Andhra Pradesh as 1st and 2nd respondents respectively against the refusal order. Hon’ ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad has passed an order on 13.04.2011 in WP No. 13588 of 2011as under:

“ When the matter was taken up for hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petition that the issue involved in this writ petition is similar to the one in W.P 1320 of 2011 which was disposed of this court on 28.01.2011, where under the impugned proceeding were set aside and the respondents were directed to consider the application of the petition afresh by treating the said application for academic year 2011-2012 and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible , preferably within a period of eight weeks.

Since the issue involved in this writ petition is similar to the one in WP no. 1320 of 2011, which was disposed of on 28.01.2011 as above,


23



following the said order, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider the application dtd. 28.12.2006 of the petitioner afresh treating the said same is pending and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight weeks from today. No order as to costs.

The matter was placed before 208th meeting of SRC wherein SRC considered the matter and decided to file an appeal.As per direction of the SRC a letter was issued to the legal counsel on 18.07.11 to file an appeal before Hon’ble High court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad. In response to this office letter dated 18.07.11 our advocate has suggested as under:- “If application of the institution referred in writ petition is pending with NCTE pass orders as per NCTE Act, regulations and following Hon’ble supreme court decision in NCTE Vs Shyam Shiksha Prashikshan Sanstahen and others, if NCTE passed order earlier to filling of the writ petitions and if no application is pending with NCTE then no order are required to be passed”.It is stated that the Supreme Court has passed the judgement in Civil Appeal NO. 1125-1128/ 2011 in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidalaya and ors before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India as under:-“An institution is not entitled to recognition unless it fulfils the conditions specified in various clauses of the Regulations. The Council is directed to ensure that in future no institution is granted recognition unless it fulfils the conditions laid down in the Act and the Regulations and the time schedule fixed for processing the application by the Regional Committee and communication of the decision on the issue of recognition it strictly adhered to..”Hence a letter was issued to our legal counsel on 05.08.2011 with request to inform to Hon’ble High court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad that the matter would be considered in forth coming SRC meeting and to defend the case in the interest of NCTE and to avoid the contempt case.Note: Reopening of a close case is against NCTE Regulations and Supreme Court judgement in Civil Appeal NO. 1125-1128/ 2011 in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidalaya and ors. The matter in the instant case is not similar to matter in W.P.1320/2011 which pertains to typographical error. This case has already been refused on 04.01.2008 and appeal confirmed on 10.07.2008. The institution did not have facilities while applying for course. Hence it has to apply afresh.

The Court Orders were duly considered by the committee. It is unfortunate that the institution has sought to misinform/mislead/suppress the reason for refusal to the Hon’ble Court stating that the said application was refused/closed/rejected on the ground that the institution is Ineligible to apply, as there is a


24



ban for starting of new institutions in the State of AndhraPradesh. Further, institution is not eligible to apply for the course, as it is not a Minority institution. The application was refused due to not satisfying the norms.

The committee decided to inform the institution that their application was already duly considered, inspected and refused on the following valid specific grounds and not refused on policy of ban.

The institution is housed in commercial complex and not suitable of B.Ed course.

The space is not adequate for the proposed B.Ed course. The books in the library are not adequate.

The application of Sri Venkateshwara College of Education, Kamareddy, Nizamabad, Andhra Pradesh for B.Ed course is reject ted.(The institution be informed without waiting for confirmation of Minutes)

11. APS08131

D.EI.Ed

Alex College of Education, Ranga

Reddy.

AP

Mother Theressa Minority Welfare Educational Society, H.No.2-3-703/B/1/2, Tirmal Nagar, Amber pet, Hyderabad- 500 013 had submitted for grant of recognition to Alex College of Education, Gandimaisamma X Road, D Pochampally, Quthbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy Dist- 500 043 for B.Ed Course on 23.01.2007. The application has been scrutinized as per the provisions contained in the Regulation dtd.27.12.2005 of NCTE published in the Gazette of India on 13.01.2006 and deficiency letter was issued on 30.03.07 to the Institution for the following.

1. Building plan in original duly approved by the competent authority for B.Ed is not submitted

2. A copy of building completion certificate from the competent authority is not submitted.

3. Affidavit relating to details of land possessed on Rs.100 stamp paper attested by Notary public has not been furnished.

In the deficiency letter it is mentioned about the period of 90 days time given to submit written representation along with all required documents and also informed that in case of any deficiencies stated above still remaining and not removed within 90 days time, no extension of time will be granted and any submissions received after 90 days will be treated as invalid .

Closure letter dt.06.11.07 was sent to the Institution for Non compliance of the deficiency letter within 90 days period, informing the institution about the expiry of the stipulated period of 90 days. Consequent upon the direction of the SRC the application submitted for grant of teacher


25



education course has been treated as incomplete and the same was here by closed. Mother Theressa Minority Welfare Educational Society, filed a court case vide Writ petition No. 13197 of 2011 in the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad versus – NCTE- SRC, The Government of Andhra Pradesh School Education as first and second respondents respectively against the above SRC order dt.07.01.2009.Hon’ ble High Court has passed an order dt.25.04.2011 in WP No. 13197of 2011 as under:- “The petitioner have prayed that the direction be issued to the 1st

Respondent to consider the application dt. 02.07.2007 filed by then pursuant to the communication same by the 2nd respondent on 07.01.2009 with regard to change of policy of the state Government.After hearing the learned counsel for the parties this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent that in case the aforementioned application filled by the petitioner is pending before it, the respondent shall take necessary steps as contemplated in its communication dt 07.01.2009 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law there shall be no order as to costs,The Court order along with file placed before SRC for direction/ decisionMeanwhile a court order dated 24.06.2011 received in the office of SRC. The Hon’ble High court has directed that this writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No. 1 to consider and dispose of the application of the petitioner, if not already disposed of, in accordance with law within a period of three (3) week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall no order as to costs. The matter was placed before 208th meeting of SRC, wherein the SRC decided to file an appeal before Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad. As per direction of SRC a letter was issued to our advocate on 20.07.2011 with request to file an appeal as per direction of SRC. In response to this office letter dated 29.07.2011 the NCTE advocate has suggested as under:- “If application of the institution referred in writ petition is pending with NCTE pass orders as per NCTE Act, regulations and following Hon’ble supreme court decision in NCTE Vs Shyam Shiksha Prashikshan Sanstahen and others, if NCTE passed order earlier to filling of the writ petitions and if no application is pending with NCTE then no order are required to be passed.

The Supreme Court has passed judgement in Civil Appeal NO. 1125-1128/ 2011 in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidalaya and ors before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India as under:-

“An institution is not entitled to recognition unless it fulfils the conditions specified in various clauses of the Regulations. The Council is directed to ensure that in future no institution is granted recognition unless it fulfils the conditions laid down in the Act and


26



the Regulations and the time schedule fixed for processing the application by the Regional Committee and communication of the decision on the issue of recognition it strictly adhered to.”

Hence a letter was issued to our legal counsel on 05.08.2011 with request to inform to Hon’ble High court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad that the matter would be placed before SRC in its forth coming meeting accordingly and defend the case in the interest of NCTE and to avoid the contempt case.

Facts along with court order along with original file placed before SRC for direction. Note: In accordance with the Hon’ble High Court Order, no application of the said Institution is seen to be pending before SRC as the same is already closed vide letter dt.06.11.07. As such as per court direction no fresh order is required to be passed. However the institution may be informed accordingly.

The Court Orders were duly considered. It is unfortunate that the institution has sought to misinform/mislead the Hon’ble Court stating that the said application was refused/closed/rejected on the ground of the State Govt policy to ban starting of New institutions. The actual facts lies in


The committee decided to communicate to the institution the decision already taken as per closure letter Dt. 06.11.07, i.e., already disposed for non-reply to the deficiency letter dt. 30.03.07.

12. APS02742

D.EI.Ed

C.M. Institute of Elementary

Teacher Education, Ranga

Reddy.

AP

ST. Martin’s Educational Society, # 294, Comsary Bazaar, New Bowenpally, Secunderabad- 500 011 had submitted an application on13.01.2004 to NCTE-SRC for grant of recognition for D.Ed. course of one year duration to C.M. Institute of Elementary Teacher Education. H.No.2-199, Shobana Colony, Balanagar, Kukatpally Municipality, Ranga Reddy, Andhra Pradesh. The application was scrutinized and deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 01.10.2008 directing to submit documents within a period of 90 days as per the section 14(1) of the NCTE Regulation 2007.

SRC in its 135th meeting held on 7th – 8th June 2007 decided to treat the applications which have not submitted compliance’s as closed after expiry of 90 days of time as per the regulations of NCTE, 2005. A letter dt.31.10.2008 has been received from NCTE-Hqrs clarifying that all such cases where letter of deficiency has been issued but no reply has been received from the concerned institution within 90 days may be closed, in


27



terms of section 7(1) of NCTE Regulations.

The Institution had failed to submit the reply within 90 days. After consideration of facts and also non submission of reply to the deficiency letter within the stipulated time, it was decided to close the application.

Therefore the application of C.M Institute of Elementary Teacher Education, Andhra Pradesh was closed vide order dt.02.03.2001 The Institution had approached NCTE-Hqrs for an Appeal. NCTE – Hqrs vide letter dt. 18.03.2011 has directed to send the original file of C.M. Institute of Elementary Teacher Education. H.No.2-199, Shobana Colony, Balanagar, Kukatpally Municipality, Ranga Reddy, Andhra Pradesh to Hqrs required for appeal. Accordingly original file sent to Hqrs vide letter dt. 24.03.2011.

Meantime the St. Martin’s Educational Society and C.M. Institute of Elementary Teacher Education have filed a court case vide Writ petition No. 2566 of 2011 in the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh against NCTE-SRC and Principal Secretary, Govt. of Andhra Pradesh as first and second respondents respectively. Now. Hon’ble High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh vide order dt.25th

April 2011 has given directions as “The Petitioners have prayed that directions be issued to the first respondent to consider their representation dt.30.01.2004 for granting recognition to start D.Ed College. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the first respondent shall reconsider the aforementioned application file by the petitioners, in case the same is pending with the first respondent as on today, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy o this order. There shall be no orders as to costs”

The committee decided in its 206th meeting of SRC to arrange to file an Appeal against the orders of Hon’ble High Court of Hyderabad, immediately and also to arrange for getting the judgment stayed with immediate effect, without waiting for confirmation of minutes.As per direction of the SRC a letter was issued to the legal counsel on 27.06.2011 to file an appeal before Hon’ble High court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad. In response to this office letter dated 27.06.2011 our advocate has suggested as under:- “If application of the institution referred in writ petition is pending with NCTE pass orders as per NCTE Act, regulations and following Hon’ble supreme court decision in NCTE Vs Shyam Shiksha Prashikshan Sanstahen and others, if NCTE passed order earlier to filling of the writ petitions and if no application is pending with NCTE then no order are


28



required to be passes.Further the Supreme Court has passed judgement in Civil Appeal NO. 1125-1128/ 2011 in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidalaya and ors before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India as under:-

“An institution is not entitled to recognition unless it fulfils the conditions specified in various clauses of the Regulations. The Council is directed to ensure that in future no institution is granted recognition unless it fulfils the conditions laid down in the Act and the Regulations and the time schedule fixed for processing the application by the Regional Committee and communication of the decision on the issue of recognition it strictly adhered to.”

Hence a letter was issued to our legal counsel on 05.08.2011 with request to inform to Hon’ble High court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad that the matter should be placed before SRC its next meeting and defend the case in the interest of NCTE and to avoid any contempt case.. Note: Since no application of the institution is pending before SRC the institution is enquired to be informed accordingly.



The committee decided to communicate to the institution the decision already taken in its 135th meeting held on 7-8th of June 2077, which reads as “the committee decided to treat the applications which have not submitted complinace’s as closed after expiry of 90 days of time as per the regulations of NCTE, 2005.

13. APS02768

D.Ed

Nalanda Institute of Educational

Training (Elementary), Hyderabad.

AP

Nalanda Institute of Educational Training (Elementary) HIG-439, Phase VI, KPHB Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh. An application was submitted by Nalanda Institute of Educational Training (Elementary) HIG-439, Phase VI, KPHB Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh., for grant of recognition to D.Ed course in the office of SRC-NCTE, Bangalore vide dated 30.01.2004 under NCTE notification dated 05.1.2004 dispensed with the requirement of NOC of the State Government from the institutions running B.Ed college and invited applications for D.Ed course from different institutions for grant of recognition to Elementary Teacher Education courses under Sarva Shikshana Ahiyan (SSA).The application was under process and in the meanwhile, the


29



Government of Andhra Pradesh of Hyderabad filed a Writ Petition no. 22866 of 2005 in Hon’ble High court of Andhra Pradesh of Hyderabad challenging the Notification of NCTE with regard to the dispensing with the requirement of NOC from the State Government. The writ petition was allowed by the dispensing with the requirement of NOC from the State Government. The writ petition was allowed by the learned single judge with the directions that the rule excluding the State Government is bad. Against said judgement a Writ Appeal no. 692 of 2006 was filed in the Division Bench of Hon’ble High court of Hyderabad. Many discussions took place between the state Government of Andhra Pradesh and SRC-NCTE. However, neither state Government withdraw the case filed by them nor the stay has been vacated.

Some institutions went to the court and filed writ petitions individually seeking directions for processing of their applications, in one of such Writ Petition no. 8278 of 2008. The Hon’ble High court decided that the applications of the institutions shall be processed as per the NCTE rules and regulations norms and standards existing as on date.As per the direction of Hon’ble High court and decision of SRC for processing of pending D.Ed application as per new regulation of NCTE in its 164th Meeting held on 20th September, 2008 meeting held on 20th

September 2008, the SRC started to process the applications.As per above decision, a deficiency letter was issued to the institution vide dated 01.10.2008 directing to submit following documents within a period of 90 days as per Section 7(1) of the NCTE Regulations 2007:

1. Land document on Ownership basis having minimum 2500 sq.Mts. area with its English Translation attested to be true copy.

2. Building plan in original duly approved by the competent authority mentioning sy.No./Plot no. on the land mentioned in point No. 1 above.

3. Building Completion Certificate approved by competent authority stating the location of building, Sy. No. total built-up area.

4. Land Use Certificate from the Government Authority along with encumbrance certificate.

5. Original Affidavit relating to details of land possessed on Rs. 100 stamp paper attested by Notary public in the enclosed format.

6. Fixed deposit receipt (FDR) for Five Lakhs from Nationalized Bank submitted should be for current year.

As per para 9 (1) of Regulations “there shall be a Endowment fund of Rs. 5.00 Lakhs per course per unit in the form of fixed Deposit of a duration of and above 5 years of a nationalized bank. 7. Fixed deposit receipt (FDR) for Three lakhs from Nationalized Bank submitted should be for current year.As per para 9(1) of Regulations “there shall be a Endowment fund of Rs. 3.00 lakhs per course per unit in the form of a Fixed Deposit of a duration of and above 5 years of a nationalized bank.Mean while SRC had earlier decision in its 135th meeting held on 7th –8th


30



June 2007 itself to treat the applications which have not submitted compliance as closed after the expiry of 90 days of time as per the regulations of NCTE, 2005. Further a letter dated 31.10.2008 has been received from NCTE Hqrs clarifying that all such cases where letter of deficiency has been issued but no. reply has been received from the concerned institution within 90 days may also be closed, in terms of Section 7(1) of the NCTE Regulations.

The institution has failed to submit the reply within 90 days. After consideration of facts and also non-submission of reply to the deficiency letter within the stipulated time, it as decided to close the application, vide order dated 02.03.2009.

The institution has approached Hon’ble High court in W.P. No. 12219/11 in the matter of Sri Nalanda Institute of Educational Training (Elementary) Vs NCTE without approaching the appellate Authority, NCTE, New Delhi U/S 18 of NCTE Act. After a lapse of 2 years.The Hon’ble High court has passed on order dated 27.04.2011 as under:

“The short prayer made by the petitioners in these WP is that they may be permitted to make applications before the second respondent seeking relaxation of the cut-off date for compliance of the deficiencies as prescribed under Regulation 7 of the NCTE Regulation, 2009.After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, I am of the considered opinion that no prejudice would be caused to either of the parties in case the petitioners are permitted to make applications seeking more time to do away with the deficiencies.

In view of the above, the petitioners are permitted to move the applications as prayed for under Regulation 11 of the NCTE Regulations, 2009.

In case the applications are filed, the same shall be considered within a period of three weeks thereafter” and further stated to post after summer vacation.

Note: the order dated 31.01.2011 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidyalaya and others Vs NCTE is relevant in this regard as it insists on ensuring adherence to NCTE Act & Regulations in cut off dates etc.

The Application was duly processed and considered by the SRC and as the applicant did not bother to fulfil the deficiencies within the permissible time limit, the application was closed more than three years ago. And the same was also communicated to the applicant. Now, as reopening a more than five year old closed application would involve serious violation


31



of NCTE norms/regulations.

The committee decided in 205th meeting of SRC to arrange to file an Appeal immediately and also to arrange for getting the judgment stayed with immediate effect, without waiting for confirmation of minutes.

As per direction of SRC a letter was issued to the advocate on 27.06.2011 with request to file an appeal. In response to our letter dated 08.08.2011 our legal counsel has given legal opinion as under:-

“No appeal is required in following cases and the SRC shall pass necessary orders as per direction of the Hon’ble High Court following the NCTE Act and Regulations to avoid contempt proceedings.

Note: In this case reopening already closed application by relaxing cut off dates is in violation of NCTE Regulations and against the spirit of judgement in Civil Appeal NO. 1125-1128/ 2011 in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidalaya and others.

The Court Orders were duly considered. It is unfortunate that the institution has sought to misinform/mislead the Hon’ble Court stating that the said application was refused/closed/rejected on the ground of the State Govt policy to ban starting of New institutions. The actual facts lies in:


The Supreme Court had passed judgment in Civil Appeal No. 1125-1128/2011 in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidalaya and others before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India as Under:

“An institution is not entitled to recognition unless it fulfills the conditions specified in various clauses of the Regulations. The Council is directed to ensure that in future no institution is granted recognition unless it fulfills the conditions laid down in the Act and the Regulations and the time schedule fixed for processing the application by the Regional Committee and communication of the decision on the issue of recognition it strictly adhered to.”

Accordingly Hon’ble High Court Order was duly considered and the institution be informed that relaxation in date for submission of Deficiency letter cannot be considered in view of the provisions of the &Supreme Court judgment .“The order dated 31.01.2011, in the


32



matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidyalaya and other Vs NCTE is relevant in this regard as it insists on ensuring adherence to NCTE Act & Regulations in cut off dates, without waiting for confirmation of minutes.

The application of Nalanda Institute of Educational Training for D.Ed course is rejected.

14. APS09225

D.EI.Ed

Sri Venkateshwara

School of Education,

Guntur.

AP

Sri Venkateshwara School of Education (D.Ed), Sri Gudibandi Somi Reddy Educational Society, Kollipara, Guntur Dist-522304, Andhra Pradesh.The institution was submitted an application on 11.12.2007 for D.Ed course in the office of SRC. This office has issued closure letter on 07.07.2008 with the direction that no further correspondence whatever will be entertained in this regard, due to non compliance of deficiencies within stipulated period.

The institution has approached to Hon’ble High Court in W.P. No. 8032 of 2011 in the matter of Sri Venkateshwara School of Education (D.Ed), Sri Gudibandi Somi Reddy Educational Society, Kollipara, Guntur Dist-522304, Andhra Pradesh Vs NCTE without approaching the Appellate Authority, NCTE, New Delhi U/S 18 of NCTE Act. The Hon’ble High Court has passed on order dated 28.03.2011 as under:“If application dated 16.10.2007, submitted by the petitioner for grant of recognition to D.Ed. course is not considered as on today, the first respondent is directed to consider the same in the next meeting to be held, pending further orders.”Order of Hon’ble High court along with original file of the institution was placed before SRC for direction in its 206 th meeting held on 09-10 June 2011

As per the order of the Hon’ble High Court no application of the institution is pending as on 28-03-2011, as the institution’s application is already closed vide letter dated 07-07-2008.The committee decided in its 206th meeting of SRC to arrange to file an Appeal against the orders of Hon’ble High Court of Hyderabad immediately and also to arrange for getting the judgment stayed with immediate effect, without waiting for confirmation of minutes.As per direction of the SRC a letter was issued to the legal counsel on 27.06.2011 to file an appeal before Hon’ble High court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad.In response to this office letter dated 27.06.2011 our advocate has suggested as under:- “If application of the institution referred in writ petition is pending with NCTE pass orders as per NCTE Act, regulations and following Hon’ble Supreme Court decision in NCTE Vs Shyam Shiksha Prashikshan Sanstahen and others, if NCTE passed order earlier to filing of the writ


33



petitions and if no application is pending with NCTE then no order are required to be passed.The Supreme Court has passed judgement in Civil Appeal NO. 1125-1128/ 2011 in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidalaya and ors before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India as under:-

“An institution is not entitled to recognition unless it fulfils the conditions specified in various clauses of the Regulations. The Council is directed to ensure that in future no institution is granted recognition unless it fulfils the conditions laid down in the Act and the Regulations and the time schedule fixed for processing the application by the Regional Committee and communication of the decision on the issue of recognition it strictly adhered to.”

A letter was issued to our legal counsel on 05.08.2011 with request to inform to Hon’ble High court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad that the matter would be placed before SRC in its next meeting and to defend the case in the interest of NCTE and to avoid any contempt case.Note: Since the application is closed no further order is to be passed. However the institution could be informed of status.


1) Non-reply to the deficiency letter.2) Not due to ban.



Accordingly Hon’ble High Court Order was duly considered and the institution be informed that relaxation in date for submission of Deficiency letter cannot be considered in view of the provisions of


34



the &Supreme Court judgment .“The order dated 31.01.2011, in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidyalaya and other Vs NCTE is relevant in this regard, as it insists on ensuring adherence to NCTE Act & Regulations in cut off dates. without waiting for confirmation of minutes.

The institution be informed that already considered and refused for non-compliance of deficiencies.

15. APS04987

B.Ed

The Bearean Baptist College of

Education, Rangareddy.

AP

The Bearean Baptist College of Education, Kushaiguda, Rangareddy-500062, Andhra Pradesh. THE BEAREAN BAPTIST Educational Society, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh has submitted an application in the name and style of The Bearean Baptist College of Education, Kushaiguda, Rangareddy-500062, Andhra Pradesh for B.Ed course on 29.12.2005The application was processed and the deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 02.06.2006 and reminder dated 22.01.2007.communicating therewith the deficiencies and directing therewith for removal of the same with in 90 days from the date of issue of the deficiency letter as per the provision contained in the NCTE regulation dated 13.01.2006. No reply for removal of deficiencies was received even after 90 day period.The matter of all such institutions was considered by the SRC in its 135 th

meeting held on 7th and 8th June 2007. After careful consideration of all aspects vis-à-vis regulatory provisions, the SRC decided to close the file and communicate to the applicant institute to this effect.Consequent upon the direction of the SRC the application submitted for grant of teacher education course has been treated incomplete and therefore the same was closed. The institution was informed vide letter dated 27.06.2007It was also communicated that if the institution wants to seek recognition for any teacher education course including the one for which this application was submitted. it may make fresh application in the prescribed format and manner available on NCTE websiteThe institution has after a lapse of more than 3 years approached Hon’ble High court in W.P. No. 12396 of 2011 in the matter of Sri The Bearean Baptist College of Education, Kushaiguda, Rangareddy-500062, Andhra Pradesh Vs NCTE without approaching the appellate Authority, NCTE, New Delhi U/S 18 of NCTE Act. The Hon’ble High court has passed an order dated 27.04.2011 as under:“The short prayer made by the petitioners in these WP is that they may be permitted to make applications before the second respondent seeking relaxation of the cut-off date for compliance of the deficiencies as prescribed under Regulation 7 of the NCTE Regulation, 2009.After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, I am of the considered opinion that no prejudice would be caused to either of the parties in case the petitioners are permitted to make applications seeking more time to do away with the deficiencies.


35



In view of the above, the petitioners are permitted to move the applications as prayed for under Regulation 11 of the NCTE Regulations, 2009.In case the applications are filed, the same shall be considered within a period of three weeks thereafter” and further stated to post after summer vacation.Order of Hon’ble High court along with original file of the institution is placed before SRC for further direction in the matter A copy of the order dated 31.01.2011 by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidyalaya and others Vs NCTE regarding ensuring adherence of NCTE Act & Regulation cut off dates etc is also attached for easy reference.The Application was duly processed and considered by the SRC and as the applicant did not bother to fulfil the deficiencies within the permissible time limit, the application was closed more than three years ago. And the same was also communicated to the applicant. Now, as reopening a more than five year old closed application would involve serious violation of NCTE norms/regulations. The committee decided to arrange to file an Appeal immediately and also to arrange for getting the judgment stayed with immediate effect, without waiting for confirmation of minutes.As per direction of SRC a letter was issued to the advocate on 27/06/11 with request to file an appeal. In response to our letter dated 27.06.2011 our legal counsel has given legal opinion as under:-“No appeal is required in following cases and the SRC shall pass necessary orders as per direction of the Hon’ble High Court following the NCTE Act and Regulations to avoid contempt proceedings. Note: In this case provision to relax the cut off date for replying to deficiencies after a period of 5 years after closing of the application would be in gross violation of NCTE Regulations. AS such the institution may apply afresh online before 30.09.2011 if eligible to apply.


1) Non-reply to the deficiency letter.2) Not due to ban.



36




Accordingly Hon’ble High Court Order was duly considered and the institution be informed that relaxation in date for submission of Deficiency letter cannot be considered in view of the provisions of the &Supreme Court judgment .“The order dated 31.01.2011, in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidyalaya and other Vs NCTE is relevant in this regard, as it insists on ensuring adherence to NCTE Act & Regulations in cut off dates. without waiting for confirmation of minutes.

Tthe institution be informed that already considered and refused for non-compliance of deficiencies.

16. APS02594

B.Ed

St. Francis College of

Elementary Teacher

Education, Nalgonda.

AP

St. Francis College of Elementary Teacher Education, Gandhinagar, Jangoan Road, Suryapet, Nalgonda District , Andhra Pradesh managed by St. Francis Educational Society, B1, III Floor, M.J. Apartments, CPL Road, Amberpet, Hyderabad

St. Francis Educational Society, B1, III Floor, M.J. Apartments, CPL Road, Amberpet, Hyderabad has submitted an application on 03.02.2004 to the Southern Regional Committee of NCTE for grant of recognition to St. Francis College of Elementary Teacher Education, Gandhinagar, Jangoan Road, Suryapet, Nalgonda District , Andhra Pradesh for D.Ed Course. Under NCTE notification dt. 15.01.2004 dispensed with the requirement of NOC of the State Government from the Institutions for grant of recognition to Elementary Teacher Education courses under Sarva Shikshana Abhiyan (SSA)

The application was under process and in the meantime, the Government of Andhra Pradesh , Hyderabad field a Writ Petition No. 22866 of 2005 in the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh of Hyderabad challenging the Notification of NCTE with regard to the dispensing with the requirement of NOC from the State Government. The WP was allowed by the learned single judge with the directions that the rule excluding the State Government is bad. Against the said judgment a Writ Appeal No. 692 of 2006 was filed in the division Bench of Hon’ble High Court of Hyderabad. Many discussion took place between the State Government and Andhra Pradesh and SRC –NCTE. However, neither State Government withdrew the case filed by them nor the stay has been vacated.


37



In meantime some institutions went to the Court and filed writ petitions individually, seeking directions for processing of their application, in one such Writ petition No. 8278 of 2008. The Hon’ble High Court decided that the applications of the institutions shall be processed as per the NCTE rules and regulations norms and standards existing as on date. As per the direction of Hon’ble High Court and decision of SRC for processing of pending D.Ed applications as per the new regulations of NCTE in its 174th

meeting held on 20th September 2008, in the SRC started to process the applications.In view of the above decision, a deficiency letter dt. 20.09.2008 was issued to the Institution directing to submit following documents within a period of 90 days as per Section 7(1) of NCTE regulations 2007.

Land documents on owner ship basis having minimum 2500 sq mtrs area with its English translation attested to be true copy.

Building plan in original duly approved by the competent authority mentioning Sy. No./ \Plot No. on the land mentioned in point No.1 above.

Building completion certificate approved by the competent authority stating the location of building. Sy.No.. Total built-up area.

Land use certificate from the Government Authority along with the encumbrance certificate.

Original affidavit relating to details of land processed on Rs.100/- stamp paper attested by the Notary Public in the enclosed format.

Fixed deposit receipt (FDR) for Five Lakhs from Nationalized Bank for the current year to be submitted. As per para 9(1) of regulations “ there shall be reserve fund of Rs.3.00 Lakhs per course per unit in form of a fixed deposit for a duration of 5 yrs of Nationalized bank.

SRC in its 135th meeting held on 7th & 8th June 2007 decided to the applications which have not submitted compliance’ as closed after expiry of 90 days time as per the regulations of NCTE,2005.A letter dt. 31.10.2008 has been received from the NCTE-Hqrs clarifying that all such cases where letter of deficiency has been issued but reply has been received from the concerned institution within 90 days may also be closed term of section 7(1) of NCTE regulation. The institution has failed to submit the reply within 90 days. After consideration of facts and also no-submission of reply to the efficiency letter within the stipulated time, it is decided to close the application and closure order issued on 27/02/2009.

The institution has approached in the Hon’ble High in writ petition no. 12412 of 2011 without approaching to appeal committee, NCTE HQ under section 18 of NCTE Act,. Hon’ble High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad passed an common order in WP 9620, 12219, 12396, 12400, 12404, 12412 and 12419 of 2011 on 27.04.2011 as mentioned below“ The short prayer made by the petitioners in these Writ Petitions is that


38



they may be permitted to make applications before the second respondent seeking relaxation of the cutoff date for compliance of the deficiencies as prescribed under regulation 7 of the NCTE Regulations, 2009.After hearing the learned council for the petitioners I am of the considered opinion that no prejudice would be caused to either of the parties in case the petitioners are permitted to make applications seeking more time to do away with the deficiencies.In view of the above, the petitioners are permitted to move the applications as prayed for under Regulation ii of the NCTE Regulations, 2009.In case the applications are filed , the same shall be considered within a period of three weeks thereafter.”The committee decided in 206th meeting to arrange to file an Appeal against the orders of Hon’ble High Court of Hyderabad immediately and also to arrange for getting the judgment stayed with immediate effect, without waiting for confirmation of minutes.As per direction of SRC a letter was issued to the advocate on 07.07.2011 with request to file an appeal. In response to our letter dated 08.08.2011 our legal counsel has given legal opinion as under:-“No appeal is required in following cases and the SRC shall pass necessary orders as per direction of the Hon’ble High Court following the NCTE Act and Regulations to avoid contempt proceedings. Note: Relaxing cut off dates for closed applications is against NCTE Regulations and judgement in Civil Appeal NO. 1125-1128/ 2011 in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidalaya and others.

The Court Orders were duly considered. It is unfortunate that the institution has sought to misinform/mislead the Hon’ble Court stating that the said application was refused/closed/rejected on the ground of the State Govt policy to ban starting of New institutions. The actual facts lies in 1) Non reply to the deficiency letter:

Land document on Ownership basis having minimum 2500 sq.Mts. area with its English Translation attested to be true copy.

Building plan in original duly approved by the competent authority mentioning sy.No./Plot no. on the land mentioned in point No. 1 above.

Building Completion Certificate approved by competent authority stating the location of building, Sy. No. total built-up area.

Land Use Certificate from the Government Authority along with encumbrance certificate.

Original Affidavit relating to details of land possessed on Rs. 100 stamp paper attested by Notary public in the enclosed format.


39



Fixed deposit receipt (FDR) for Five Lakhs from Nationalized Bank submitted should be for current year.

As per para 9 (1) of Regulations “there shall be a Endowment fund of Rs. 5.00 Lakhs per course per unit in the form of fixed Deposit of a duration of and above 5 years of a nationalized bank.

Fixed deposit receipt (FDR) for three lakhs from Nationalized Bank submitted should be for current year.

As per para 9(1) of Regulations “there shall be a Reserve fund of Rs. 3.00 lakhs per course per unit in the form of a Fixed Deposit of a duration of and above 5 years of a nationalized bank.

Accordingly Hon’ble High Court order was duly considered and the institution be informed that relaxation in cutoff date for submission of Deficiency letter cannot be considered in view of the provisions of the &Supreme Court judgment “The order dated 31.01.2011, in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidyalaya and other Vs NCTE is relevant in this regard as it insists on ensuring adherence to NCTE Act & Regulations in cut off dates etc.

The institution be informed that already considered and refused for non-compliance of deficiencies.

17. APS05247

B.Ed

Holy Mary College of Education,

Guntur

AP

Holy Mary College of Education, Holy Trinity Educational Society, Kanepudi, Sattenapally, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh. Holy Trinity Educational Society, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh has submitted an application in the name and style of Holy Mary College of Education, Kanepudi (V), Sattenapally (M), Guntur Dist-Andhra Pradesh for B.Ed course on 30.12.2005.The application was processed and the deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 09.05.2006.communicating therewith the deficiencies and directing therewith for removal of the same with in 90 days from the date of issue of the deficiency letter as per the provision contained in the NCTE regulation dated 13.01.2006. No reply for removal of deficiencies was received even after 90 day period.The matter of all such institutions was considered by the SRC in its 135 th

meeting held on 7th and 8th June 2007. After careful consideration of all aspects vis-à-vis regulatory provisions, the SRC decided to close the file and communicate to the applicant institute to this effect.Consequent upon the direction of the SRC the application submitted for grant of teacher education course has been treated incomplete and therefore the same was closed. The institution was informed vide letter dated 27.06.2007It was also communicated that if the institution wants to seek recognition for any teacher education course including the one for which this application was submitted. it may make fresh application in the prescribed format and manner available on NCTE website


40



The institution has after a lapse of more than 3 years approached Hon’ble High court in W.P. No. 12400 of 2011 in the matter of Sri Holy Mary College of Education, Kantepudi (V), Sattenapalli (M.Ed), Guntur Dist, Andhra Pradesh Vs NCTE without approaching the appellate Authority, NCTE, New Delhi U/S 18 of NCTE Act. The Hon’ble High court has passed an order dated 27.04.2011 as under:“The short prayer made by the petitioners in these WP is that they may be permitted to make applications before the second respondent seeking relaxation of the cut-off date for compliance of the deficiencies as prescribed under Regulation 7 of the NCTE Regulation, 2009.After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, I am of the considered opinion that no prejudice would be caused to either of the parties in case the petitioners are permitted to make applications seeking more time to do away with the deficiencies.In view of the above, the petitioners are permitted to move the applications as prayed for under Regulation 11 of the NCTE Regulations, 2009.

In case the applications are filed, the same shall be considered within a period of three weeks thereafter” and further stated to post after summer vacation.Order of Hon’ble High court along with original file of the institution is placed before SRC for further direction on the same. A copy of the order dated 31.01.2011 by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidyalaya and others Vs NCTE regarding ensuring adherence of NCTE Act & Regulation cut off dates etc is also attached for easy reference.The Application was duly processed and considered by the SRC and as the applicant did not bother to fulfil the deficiencies within the permissible time limit, the application was closed more than three years ago. And the same was also communicated to the applicant. Now, as reopening a more than five year old closed application would involve serious violation of NCTE norms/regulationsThe committee decided to arrange to file an Appeal immediately and also to arrange for getting the judgment stayed with immediate effect, without waiting for confirmation of minutesThe committee decided in 205th meeting of SRC to arrange to file an Appeal immediately and also to arrange for getting the judgment stayed with immediate effect, without waiting for confirmation of minutes. As per direction of SRC a letter was issued to the advocate on 27.06.2011 with request to file an appeal. In response to our letter dated 08.08.2011 our legal counsel has given legal opinion as under:- “No appeal is required in following cases and the SRC shall pass necessary orders as per direction of the Hon’ble High Court following the NCTE Act and Regulations to avoid contempt proceedings”. Note: Any relaxation of cut off dates is against NCTE Regulations as well


41



as judgement in Civil Appeal NO. 1125-1128/ 2011 in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidalaya and ors

Accordingly Hon’ble High Court order was duly considered and the institution be informed that relaxation in cutoff date for submission of Deficiency letter cannot be considered in view of the provisions of the &Supreme Court judgment “The order dated 31.01.2011, in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidyalaya and other Vs NCTE is relevant in this regard as it insists on ensuring adherence to NCTE Act & Regulations in cut off dates etc.


The committee decided to reject the application of the institution and inform the institution accordingly.

18. APS05228

B.Ed

Suprabhath College of Education,

Rangareddy.

AP

Suprabhath College of Edcuation, KTTC Kaushik Educational Society, Cheeryal, Keesara Mandal, Rangareddy-501301, Andhra Pradesh. KTTC Kaushik Educational Society, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh has submitted an application in the name and style of Suprabhath College of Edcuation, Cheeryal, Keesara Mandal, Rangareddy-501301, Andhra Pradesh for B.Ed course on 02.01.2006The application was processed and the deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 12.05.2006.communicating therewith the deficiencies and directing therewith for removal of the same with in 90 days from the date of issue of the deficiency letter as per the provision contained in the NCTE regulation dated 13.01.2006. No reply for removal of deficiencies was received even after 90 day period.The matter of all such institutions was considered by the SRC in its 135 th

meeting held on 7th and 8th June 2007. After careful consideration of all aspects vis-à-vis regulatory provisions, the SRC decided to close the file and communicate to the applicant institute to this effect.Consequent upon the direction of the SRC the application submitted for grant of teacher education course has been treated incomplete and therefore the same was closed. The institution was informed vide letter dated 27.06.2007It was also communicated that if the institution wants to seek recognition for any teacher education course including the one for which this application was submitted. it may make fresh application in the prescribed format and manner available on NCTE website.


42



The institution has after a lapse of more than 3 years approached Hon’ble High court in W.P. No. 12419 of 2011 in the matter of Sri Suprabhath College of Edcuation, Cheeryal, Keesara Mandal, Rangareddy-501301, Andhra Pradesh Vs NCTE without approaching the appellate Authority, NCTE, New Delhi U/S 18 of NCTE Act. The Hon’ble High court has passed an order dated 27.04.2011 as under:“The short prayer made by the petitioners in these WP is that they may be permitted to make applications before the second respondent seeking relaxation of the cut-off date for compliance of the deficiencies as prescribed under Regulation 7 of the NCTE Regulation, 2009.After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, I am of the considered opinion that no prejudice would be caused to either of the parties in case the petitioners are permitted to make applications seeking more time to do away with the deficiencies.In view of the above, the petitioners are permitted to move the applications as prayed for under Regulation 11 of the NCTE Regulations, 2009.

In case the applications are filed; the same shall be considered within a period of three weeks thereafter” and further stated to post after summer vocation.Order of Hon’ble High court along with original file of the institution is placed before SRC for further direction on the same. A copy of the order dated 31.01.2011 by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidyalaya and others Vs NCTE regarding ensuring adherence of NCTE Act & Regulation cut off dates etc is also attached for easy reference.The Application was duly processed and considered by the SRC and as the applicant did not bother to fulfil the deficiencies within the permissible time limit, the application was closed more than three years ago. And the same was also communicated to the applicant. Now, as reopening a more than five year old closed application would involve serious violation of NCTE norms/regulations.The committee decided to arrange to file an Appeal immediately and also to arrange for getting the judgment stayed with immediate effect, without waiting for confirmation of minutes.The committee decided in 205th meeting of SRC to arrange to file an Appeal immediately and also to arrange for getting the judgment stayed with immediate effect, without waiting for confirmation of minutes. As per direction of SRC a letter was issued to the advocate on 27.06.2011 with request to file an appeal. In response to our letter dated 08.08.2011 our legal counsel has given legal opinion as under:- “No appeal is required in following cases and the SRC shall pass necessary orders as per direction of the Hon’ble High Court following the NCTE Act and Regulations to avoid contempt proceedings”. Note: Any relaxation of cut off dates is against NCTE Regulations as well


43



as judgement in Civil Appeal NO. 1125-1128/ 2011 in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidalaya and others.

Hon’ble High Court order was duly considered and the institution be informed that relaxation in cutoff date for submission of Deficiency letter cannot be considered in view of the provisions of the &Supreme Court judgment “The order dated 31.01.2011, in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidyalaya and other Vs NCTE is relevant in this regard as it insists on ensuring adherence to NCTE Act & Regulations in cut off dates etc.


Accordingly Hon’ble High Court was duly considered and the institution be informed that relaxation in date for submission of reply to the deficiency letter cannot be considered in view of the provisions of the NCTE act/norms/regulations &Supreme Court judgment “The order dated 31.01.2011, in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidyalaya and other Vs NCTE is relevant in this regard as it insists on ensuring adherence to NCTE Act & Regulations in cut off dates etc.

The committee decided to inform that relaxation of cutoff date is here by refused as it violates NCTE Regulations & supreme Court judgment, as it is already disposed for non-reply to the deficiency letter.

19. APS08561

D.EI.Ed

Ponnavolu Gopi Reddy D.Ed

College, Kadapa.

AP

Ponnavolu Gopi Reddy D.Ed College, Ramaniayaneya nagar, Gapavaram mandal Badavel town, Kadapa district, Andhra Pradesh .

Venugopalswamy Educational Society, Ramanjayaneya nagar, Gapavaram mandal, Badavel town, Kadapa district, Andhra Pradesh for grant of recognition to Ponnavolu Gopi Reddy D.Ed College, Ramanjayaneya nagar, Gapavaram mandal, Badavel town, Kadapa district, Andhra Pradesh for D.Ed Course on 27.04.2007.

The application has been scrutinized and deficiency letter dated 06.06.2007 was sent to the Institution giving 90 days time to remove the deficiencies The Institution submitted its reply vide letter dtd.08.08.2009. Upon scrutiny of the said deficiency letter, a letter dtd.22.08.2007 was sent seeking clarification in respect of Land documents of proposed D.Ed


44



Course to be run by Sri Venugopala Swamy Educational Society. The Institution did not submit its reply for the deficiencies even after completion of 90 days period. The matter was placed before 135 th SRC Meeting held on 07th and 08th June 2007. The SRC decided to close the file and inform the Institute about the decision. Accordingly ,the application of the Institution has been treated as incomplete and was closed vide order 06.08.2008, for Non compliance to the deficiency letter within 90 days period and closure of the file .Venugopalswamy Educational Society, Andhra Pradesh filed a Court case vide Writ Petition No. 13596 of 2011 in the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh Verses NCTE-SRC and Government of Andhra Pradesh School Education department as 1st and 2nd respondent respectively against the closure order. Hon’ ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad has passed an order on 13.04.2011 in WP No. 13596 of 2011 as under:-

“When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the issue involved in this Writ Petition is similar to the one in WP No. 1320 of 2011, which was disposed of by the Court on 28.01.2011 where under the impugned proceedings were set aside and the respondents were directed to consider the application of the petitioner afresh by treating the said application for academic year 2011 -2012 and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible. Preferably within a eight weeks.”

Since the issue involved in this Writ petition is similar to one in WP.No. 1320 of 211, which was disposed of on 28.01.2011 as above, following the said order, this petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider the application dated 13.04.2007 of the petitioner afresh by treating the said application for the academic year 2011-12 in the Case the same is pending and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible, preferable within a period od eight weeks from today, no. order as to costs”. The matter was placed in 208th meeting of SRC, wherein the Committee considered the matter and decided to file an appeal. As per direction of the SRC a letter was issued to the legal counsel on 18.07.11 to file an appeal before Hon’ble High court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad. In response to this office letter dated 18.07.11 our advocate has suggested as under:- “If application of the institution referred in writ petition is pending with NCTE pass orders as per NCTE Act, regulations and following Hon’ble supreme court decision in NCTE Vs Shyam Shiksha Prashikshan Sanstahen and others, if NCTE passed order earlier to filling of the writ petitions and if no application is pending with NCTE then no order are required to be passed.The supreme court has passed in the judgement in Civil Appeal NO.


45



1125-1128/ 2011 in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidalaya and ors before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India as under:-“An institution is not entitled to recognition unless it fulfils the conditions specified in various clauses of the Regulations. The Council is directed to ensure that in future no institution is granted recognition unless it fulfils the conditions laid down in the Act and the Regulations and the time schedule fixed for processing the application by the Regional Committee and communication of the decision on the issue of recognition it strictly adhered to..”Hence a letter was issued to our legal counsel on 05.08.2011 with request to inform to Hon’ble High court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad that matter shall be placed before SRC at its next meeting and defend the case in the interest of NCTE and to avoid any contempt case.Note: Since no application is pending before SRC no fresh order is required to be passed. However institution


1/ Non reply to the deficiency letter Dt. 06.06.2007.

2/ Non-removal of deficiencies pointed out in deficiency letter Dt. 06.06.2007.

The application of the institution was treated as incomplete and was closed on 06.08.2008.

The Hon’ble High Court order was duly considered and the institution be informed that relaxation in cutoff date for submission of Deficiency letter cannot be considered in view of the provisions of the &Supreme Court judgment “The order dated 31.01.2011, in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidyalaya and other Vs NCTE is relevant in this regard as it insists on ensuring adherence to NCTE Act & Regulations in cut off dates etc.



46



The committee decided to inform that relaxation of cutoff date is here by refused as it violates NCTE Regulations & supreme Court judgment, as it is already disposed for non-reply to the deficiency letter.

The application of Ponnavolu Gopi Reddy D.Ed College, Ramanjayaneyanagar, Gapavaram mandal, Badavel town, Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh for D.Ed course is hereby refused. In the light of Supreme Court Appeal No. 1125-1128 of 2011 in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidalaya and others where NCTE Regulation & Act are to be adhered to in all matters of the teachers education institute and the application of the institution was closed due to non compliance of reply to deficiency letter even after expiry of mandatory period of 90 days period.

20. APS02584

D.Ed

Holy Faith Minority

Educational Society,

Khammam.

AP

An application was submitted by Holy Faith Minority Educational Society, Sathupalli, Khammam District, Andhra Pradesh for grand of recognition to D.Ed course in the office of SRC-NCTE, Bangalore vide dated 03.02.2004 under NCTE notification dated 05.01.2004 dispensed with the requirement of NOC of the State Government from the institution running B.Ed college and invited application for D.Ed course from different institution for grant of recognition to Elementary Teacher Education courses under Sarva Shikshana Ahiyan (SSA).

The application was under process and in the meanwhile, the Government of Andhra Pradesh of Hyderabad filed a Writ Petition No.22866 of 2005 in the Hon’ble High court of Andhra Pradesh of Hyderabad challenging the Notification of NCTE with regard to the dispensing with the requirement of NOC from the State Government. The writ petition was allowed by the learned single judge with the directions that the rule excluding the State Government is bad. Against said judgment a Writ Appeal No.692 of 2006 was filled in the Division Bench of Hon’ble High Court of Hyderabad. Many discussions took place between the State Government of Andhra Pradesh and SRC-NCTE. However, neither State Government withdrew the case filed by them nor the stay has been vacted.Some institution went to the court and filed writ petitions individually, seeking directions for processing of their applications, in one of such Writ Petition No.8278 of 2008. The Hon’ble Court decided that the applications of the institutions shall be processed as per the NCTE rules and regulations norms and standards existing as on date.As per the direction of Hon’ble High Court and decision of SRC for processing of D.Ed application as per new regulation of NCTE in its 164 th

meeting held on 20th September 2008, the SRC started to process the applications.

In view of the above decision, a deficiency letter was issued to the


47



institution vide dated 30.09.2008 directing to submit following documents within a period of 90 days as per Section 7(1) of the NCTE Regulations 2007:

1. Land document on Ownership basis having minimum 2500 Sq.Mts area with its English Translation attested to be true copy.

2. Building plan in original duly approved by the competent authority mentioning Sy.No/Plot no on the land mentioned in point No. above.

3. Building Completion Certificate approved by competent authority stating the location of building, Sy. No, total built-up area.

4. Land use certificate from the Government Authority along with encumbrance certificate.

5. Original Affidavit relating to details of land possessed on Rs.100 stamp paper attested by Notary Public in the enclosed format.

6. Fixed deposit receipt (FDR) for Five Lakhs from Nationalized Bank Submitted should be for current year.As per para 9(1) of Regulations”there shall be a Endowment fund of Rs. 5.00 Lakhs per course per unit in the form of a Fixed Deposit of a duration of and above 5 years of a nationalized bank

7. Fixed deposit receipt(FDR) for Three Lakhs from Nationalized Bank submitted should be for current year.As per para 9(1) of Regulation “there shall be a reserve fund of 3.00 Lakhs per course per unit in the form of a Fixed Deposit of a duration of and above 5 years of a nationalized bank.

SRC in its 135th meeting held on 7th-8th June 2007 decided to treat the application which have noy submitted compliance’s as closed after the expiry of 90 days of the time as per the regulation of NCTE, 2005. A letter dated 31.10.2008 has been received from NCTE Hqrs clarifying that all such cases where letter of deficiency has been issued but no reply has been received from the concerned institution within 90 days may be closed, in terms of Section 7(1) of the NCTE Regulations.

The institution has failed to submit the reply within 90 days. After consideration of facts and also non-submission of reply to the deficiency letter within the stipulated time, it is decided to close the application.

As per direction of SRC closure order issued on 02.03.2009.

The institution has approached to Hon’ble High court Andhra Pradesh in writ petition no. 13233/2011. The Hon’ble High Court has passed an order as under:-

“Learned Govt. pleader for respondents, however, submits that the petitioner has not removed the deficiencies pointed out and hence, inspection could not be done. It is, however, submitted that in case the petitioner files a fresh representation, the same shall be considered


48



expeditiously

After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioner may if so advised submit a fresh application before the first respondent and on receipt of the same inspection be carried out the respondents within a period of six weeks from the date of submission of the application. NO costs.”

The Apex court in the judgement in Civil Appeal NO. 1125-1128/ 2011 in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidalaya and ors before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India as under:-

“ An institution is not entitled to recognition unless it fulfils the conditions specified in various clauses of the Regulations. The Council is directed to ensure that in future no institution is granted recognition unless it fulfils the conditions laid down in the Act and the Regulations and the time schedule fixed for processing the application by the Regional Committee and communication of the decision on the issue of recognition it strictly adhered to.”

Hon’ble High court Court has also passed an order in writ petition no. 128/2011 in the matter Shree Sitheshwar Education Trust Wherein the Hon’ble High Court has passed an order as under:-

“ The Counsel for the petitioner has with reference to the inspection report of 12th March, 2009, sought to argue that the order are erroneous. However, the petitioner having chosen to allow the order to attain finality and being content with agitating the matter only after raising fresh construction, cannot long laps of time be heard to make fresh such arguments.

The matter was placed in 209th meeting of SRC, wherein the SRC considered the matter and decided to file an appeal. As per direction of SRC a letter was issued to our advocate on 05.08.2011 with request to file an appeal. In response to our letter dated 05.08.2011 our legal counsel has sent reply vide letter dated 06.08.2011(SRC diary no. 107841) as under:-

“ No –appeal is required in the following cases and the SRC shall pass necessary orders as per directions of the Hon’ble High Court following the NCTE, Act and Regulation to avoid contempt proceedings. “ In this case decision to close the case is already issued on 02.03.2009 as institution has not adhered to NCTE Regulations time limit.

The Court Orders were duly considered. It is unfortunate that the


49



institution has sought to misinform/mislead the Hon’ble Court stating that the said application was refused/closed/rejected on the ground of the State Govt policy to ban for starting of New institutions. The actual facts lies in 1) Non reply to the deficiency letter:

Land document on Ownership basis having minimum 2500 sq.Mts. area with its English Translation attested to be true copy.

Building plan in original duly approved by the competent authority mentioning sy.No./Plot no. on the land mentioned in point No. 1 above.








Accordingly Hon’ble High Court order was duly considered and the institution be informed that relaxation in date for submission of Deficiency letter cannot be considered in view of the provisions of NCTE act, norms, regulations &Supreme Court judgment “The order dated 31.01.2011, in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidyalaya and other Vs NCTE is relevant in this regard as it insists on ensuring adherence to NCTE Act & Regulations in cut off dates etc.

Further, the committee considered the application and Court directions, and decided to refuse recognition as the application is already considered and disposed for Non-compliance of deficiency letter. Accordingly, decision be informed and further the institution may be directed to submit fresh application on online in the prescribed format within the stipulated time limit.


50



21. APS05860

D.EI.Ed

Sri Vidya D.Ed College, Ranga

Reddy.

AP

Sri Saraswathi Vidyanilayam Educational Society, Gandimysamma X Road, Bowrampet Rangareddy Distt, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Sri Vidya D.Ed college, Bowrampet, Ranga Reddy Distt, Andhra Pradesh for D.Ed Course of two year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 02.01.2006.

The Application was scrutinized and deficiency letter was issued to the applicant institution on 12.05.2006. The institution has not submitted reply within 90 days. The matter of all such institution was considered by SRC in its 135th meeting held on 07th -08th June, 2007. After careful consideration of all aspects vis-à-vis regulatory provisions, the SRC decided to close the file and communicate the applicant institute to this effect. As per direction of SRC closer order issued on 28.06.2007.

The institution has approached to direct to Hon’ble High court in writ petition no. 28495/2010 without approached to appeal in the NCTE HQ under section 18 of NCTE Act. The Hon’ble High court has passed an order dated 30.04.2011. The operative part of order as under:-“This writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to conduct inspection of the petitioner’s proposed D.Ed colleges and consider and dispose of the application of the petitioner in accordance with law, within a period of SIX weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As per perusal of the institution i.e. Sri Saraswathi Vidyanilayam Educational Society, Gandimysamma X Road, Bowrampet Rangareddy Distt, Andhra Pradesh has submitted two application on 02.01.2006 as under:-

2. Sri Vidya D.Ed College, Gandimysamma X Road, Bowrampet, Ranga Reddy Distt, Andhra Pradesh for D.Ed Course. File no. APS05860.

3. Sri Vidya College of Education, Gandimy Samma, Bowrampet, Ranga Reddy Distt, Andhra Pradesh for B.Ed Course, File no. APS06003.

In Sr. no. 2, the matter was placed in 206 th meeting of SRC, wherein the Committee considered the matter and decided to process the new application for B.Ed as per Court directions, if the management files fresh applications as per Court directions and other related supporting original documents as per the regulations, within four weeks from the date of confirmation of the Minutes. However the SR. no. 1 is under process.As per Regulation 2009, the institution can apply for any other teacher education programme /additional unit. (in this case D.Ed course) has to complete three academic session as per NCTE Act/Regulations. In this case clause 8(3) of Regulation 2009 reads as under :-


51



“An institution can apply for one basic unit only of an additional course or for an additional unit of the existing recognised course after completion of three academic sessions of the respective course, for which the institution shall submit application before the cut off date prescribed for submission of applications in the year succeeding the completion of three academic sessions.”

The matter was placed before 208th meeting of SRC, wherein the SRC decided to file an appeal before Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad. Accordingly a letter was issued to our legal counsel on 18.07.2011 with request to file an appeal.

In response to our letter dated 18.07.2011 our legal counsel has given legal opinion as under:-

“If application of the institution referred in writ petition is pending with NCTE pass orders as per NCTE Act, regulations and following Hon’ble supreme court decision in NCTE Vs Shyam Shiksha Prashikshan Sanstahen and others, if NCTE passed order earlier to filling of the writ petitions and if no application is pending with NCTE then no order are required to be passes.”

The Supreme Court has passed in the judgement in Civil Appeal NO. 1125-1128/ 2011 in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidalaya and ors before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India as under:-


Hence a letter was issued to our legal counsel on 05.08.2011 with request to inform to Hon’ble High court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad accordingly and defend the case in the interest of NCTE and to avoid any contempt case..

Facts along with court order, NCTE Regulations in position as well as supreme court judgement is placed along with original file before SRC for direction.

The committee decided that the application of the institution as already considered and disposed for non-compliance of deficiency letter Dt. 12.05.2006. As the application of the institution was already


52



disposed Dt. 28.06.2007, no application is pending with the SRC for consideration of inspection.

Accordingly, the committee decided to inform the institution regarding disposal of the application as no application is pending.

22. APS09739

D.Ed

Sarada Teacher Training Institute,

Kurnool.

AP

Sarada Teacher Training Institute, 87/1368, Maruthi Nagar, B-Camp, Kurnool, Distt Andhra Pradesh managed by Adarsha Education Society, Maruthi Nagar, Atmakur Road, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh . Course-D.Ed. File Code:- 9739Adarsha Education Society, Maruthi Nagar, Atmakur Road, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh had submitted an application seeking grant of recognition for starting D.Ed course to Sarada Teacher Training Institute, 87/1368, Maruthi Nagar, B-Camp, Kurnool, Distt Andhra Pradesh on 31.10.2008.

The file was under process and in the meanwhile in view of the recommendations of the State Govt. of Andhra Pradesh vide letter dated 07.01.2009 not to further recognize/permit the institutions for conducting B.Ed, D.Ed , Physical Education, Language Pandit Course.

A letter dated 17th March 2009 has been received from NCTE HQ informing that the recommendations of the Govt. of Andhra Pradesh not to grant recognition/permission in respect of other courses like B.Ed, D.Ed and Physical Education Course have further been considered in NCTE and it has been decided that no further recognition/permission to any institution in the state of Andhra Pradesh be considered by SRC for the academic session 2009-2010 for B.ED , D.Ed and Physical Education course also.

The letter dated 07.01.2009,07.02.2009, 17.03.2009 and 20.03.2009 was considered by SRC in its 172nd meeting held on 25th -26th March, 2009 and SRC decided to accept the recommendation of the State Govt. of Andhra Pradesh not to grant recognition to any of the teacher Training institution in state of Andhra Pradesh for the year 2009-2010 and decided to closed the applications.

The institution did not reply to deficiency letter dt. 24.12.2008.

As per direction of SRC closure order was issued to the applicant institution on 22.04.2009 to the applicant institution.

The institution has approached to Hon’ble High court of Andhra Pradesh in writ petition no. 30731/2010. The Hon’ble High Court has passed court order dated 16.07.2011 as under:-

“ After hearing learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is


53



disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the application of the petitioner without reference to the State Govt. policy dated 07.01.2009 within a period of two months from the date of a certified copy of the this order. There shall be no order as to costs. “

The Apex court in the judgement in Civil Appeal NO. 1125-1128/ 2011 in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidalaya and ors before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India as under:-




The matter was placed in 209th meeting of SRC, wherein the SRC considered the matter and decided to file an appeal before Hon’ble High court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad. (However the minutes of the same not finalized) . As per direction of SRC a letter was issued to our advocate on 05.08.2011 . In response to our letter dated 05.08.2011 our legal counsel has sent reply vide letter dated 06.08.2011(SRC diary no. 107841) as under:-“ No –appeal is required in the following cases and the SRC shall pass necessary orders as per directions of the Hon’ble High Court following the NCTE, Act and Regulation

The committee considered the High Court order and all relevant documents and decided to inform the institution that, as the application was already considered and disposed for non-compliance of deficiency letter Dt. 24.12.2008. As the application of the institution was already disposed Dt. 22.04.2009, no application is pending with the SRC. The committee accordingly decided to inform the institution


54



regarding disposal of the application.

23. SRCAPP172

D.EI.Ed

Sree Datta Institute of

Pharmacy, Ranga Reddy. District.

AP

Sree Datta Institute of Pharmacy, sagar Road, Sheriguda, Ibrahmipatnam R.R Distt, Andhra Pradesh. The institution i.e Sree Datta Institute of Pharmacy, sagar Road, Sheriguda, Ibrahmipatnam R.R Distt, Andhra Pradesh has submitted an application along with court order dated 13.07.2011 for seeking recognition for D.Ed course .The Hon’ble High court has directed in writ petition no. 17568/2011 in the matter of Yyjayanthi Educational Society Vs NCTE. The Hon’ble High court has directed as under:- “The petitioners have prayed for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider their application dated 31.10.2009 for grant of permission to conduct D.Ed course. It has been averred by the learned Counsel for the petitioners that through the aforesaid application for grant of permission to conduct D.Ed. course is submitted by the petitioners 1 ½ year back, no decision has been taken by the respondent as yet. After hearing the learned Counsel for the parties , this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider and dispose of the application of the petitioners dated 31.10.2009, in accordance with law, expeditiously. There shall be no order as to costs.” SRC-APP-172 is related to last year i.e. 2009-10 and perusal of the file the Institution has submitted recently along with court order dated 28.07.2011.Court order along with original file placed before SRC for direction.

The committee considered the Court order and all other relevant documents and decided to inform the institution that, hard copy of the application was received only on 28/7/2011, while the on line version of the same was filed on 31/10/2009, i.e., (one and half years) 1 ½ years, after submission of on line application. On line application alone cannot be processed unless the Hard Copy accompanied with the documents is submitted in time i.e., before the last date of submission of application.

The application of the institution was duly considered as per Court direction and disposed off as it is against Law/NCTE Norms/Act.

The institution is advised to apply a fresh for academic year 2012-13 before the cutoff date i.e., on or before 30.09.2011, if otherwise eligible.

24. APS02717

D.Ed

Siddardha College of Elementary Tchr, Edn, Santhinagar, Kavali (Po), Nellore-524201, Andhra Pradesh managed by Krishna Murthy Memorial Technical & cultural Society, Kavali, Nillore Distt, Andhra Pradesh.


55



Siddardha College of Elementary

Tchr, Edn,Santhinagar,

Nellore.

AP

An application was Siddardha College of Elementary Tchr, Edn, Santhinagar, Kavali (Po), Nellore-524201, Andhra Pradesh has submitted for grand of recognition to D.Ed course in the office of SRC-NCTE, Bangalore vide dated 30.01.2004 under NCTE from the institutions running B.Ed college and invited applications for D.Ed course from different institutions for grant of recognition to Elementary Teacher Education courses under Sarva Shikshana Abiyan (SSA).

The application was under process and in the meanwhile, the Government of Andhra Pradesh of Hyderabad filed a Writ Petition No. 22866 of 2005 in the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Padesh of Hyderabad challenging the Notification of NCTE with regard to the dispensing with the requirement of NOC from the State Government. The writ petition was allowed by the learned single judge with the directions that the rule excluding the State Government is bad. Against said judgement a Writ Appeal No.692 of 2006 was filed in the Division Bench of Hon’ble High court of Hyderbad. Many discussion took place between the State Government of Andhra Pradesh and SRC-NCTE. However, neither State Government withdraw the case filed by them nor the stay has been vacated.

Some institution went to the court and filed writ petitions individual, seeking directions for processing of their application, in one of such Writ Petition No. 8278 of 2008. The Hon’ble High court decided that the applications of the institutions shall be processed as per the NCTE rules and regulations norms and standards existing as an date.

As per the direction of Hon’ble High Court and decision of SRC for processing of pending D.Ed application as per new regulation of NCTE in its 164th Meeting held on 20th September, 2008 meeting held on 20th

September 2008, the SRC started to process the applications.

In view of the above decision, a deficiency letter was issued to the institution vide dated 01.10.2008 directing to submit following documents within a period of 90 days as per Section 7(1) of the NCTE Regulation 2007:

1. Land document on ownership basis having minimum 2500 Sq. Mts area with its English Translation attested to be true copy.

2. Building plan in original duly approved by the competent authority mentioning Sy.No./Plot no on the land mentioned in point No.1 above.

3. Building completion certificate approved by competent authority stating the location of building, Sy.No. total built-up area.

4. Land use Certificate from the Government Authority along with encumbrance certificate.


56



5. Original Affidavit relating to details of land possessed on Rs. 100 stamp paper attested by Notary Public in the enclosed format.

6. Fixed deposit receipt (FDR) for Five Lakh from Nationalized Bank submitted should be for current year.As per 9(1) of Regulations “There shall be a Endowment fund of Rs. 5.00 Lakhs per course per unit in the form of a fixed Deposit of a duration of and above 5 years of a nationalized bank

7. Fixed deposit receipt (FDR) for Three Lakhs from Nationalized Bank submitted should be for current year.As per para 9(1) of Regulations “there shall be a reserved fund of 3.00 Lakhs per course per unit in the form of a Fixed Deposit of a duration of above 5 years of a nationalized bank.

Meanwhile earlier the SRC in its 135th meeting held on 7th-8th June 2007 decided to treat the application which have not submitted compliance as closed after the expiry of 90 days of time as per the regulations of NCTE, 2005. Further a letter dated 31.10.2008 has also been received from the concerned institution within 90 days may be closed, in terms of section 7(1) of the NCTE Regulations.

The institution has failed to submit the reply within 90 days. After consideration of facts and also non-submission of reply to the deficiency letter within the stipulated time, it is decided to close the application. Accordingly vide order no. F.SRO/NCTE/2008-09/9845 dated. 02.03.2009 the application of the institution was closed and communicated to the institution.

As such the application of the institution is duly considered and closed in view of non compliance of deficiencies. The same application cannot thus be re-opened. In case the applicant wishes to apply they may be advised to apply fresh if and when fresh applications are invited and also as per extant Regulations and if they are eligible to apply at that time.

As per the decision of SRC letter closure order was issue to the institution on 02.03.2009.

The institution has approached to Hon’ble High court Andhra Pradesh in writ petition no. 13233/2011. The Hon’ble High Court has passed an order as under:-

“After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider the application filed by the petitioner and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, expeditiously. NO costs..” The Apex court in the judgement in Civil Appeal NO. 1125-1128/ 2011 in


57



the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidalaya and ors before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India as under:

An institution is not entitled to recognition unless it fulfils the conditions specified in various clauses of the Regulations. The Council is directed to ensure that in future no institution is granted recognition unless it fulfils the conditions laid down in the Act and the Regulations and the time schedule fixed for processing the application by the Regional Committee and communication of the decision on the issue of recognition it strictly adhered to.”



The matter was placed in 209th meeting of SRC, wherein the SRC considered the matter and decided to file an appeal. As per direction of SRC a letter was issued to our advocate on 05.08.2011 with request to file an appeal. In response to our letter dated 05.08.2011 our legal counsel has sent reply vide letter dated 06.08.2011(SRC diary no. 107841) as under:-“ No –appeal is required in the following cases and the SRC shall pass necessary orders as per directions of the Hon’ble High Court following the NCTE, Act and Regulation to avoid contempt proceedings. “Note: Reopening of closed cases is against NCTE Regulation and judgement dated 31.01.2011 by Supreme Court Appeal No.1125-1128/2011 in the matter of Bhawar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidyalaya and others.


1) Non-reply to the deficiency letter Dt.1.10.2008.2) Not removing the deficiencies.

Land document on Ownership basis having minimum 2500 sq.Mts. area with its English Translation attested to be true


58



copy. Building plan in original duly approved by the competent

authority mentioning sy.No./Plot no. on the land mentioned in point No. 1 above.








Reopening of closed cases is against NCTE regulation.

Accordingly, Hon’ble High Court was duly considered and the institution be informed that relaxation in cutoff date for submission of Deficiency letter cannot be considered in view of the provisions of NCTE Act, norms, regulations &Supreme Court judgment “The order dated 31.01.2011, in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidyalaya and other Vs NCTE is relevant in this regard as it insists on ensuring adherence to NCTE Act & Regulations in cut off dates etc.

The committee decided to inform the application was disposed off for non-reply to the deficiency letter.

25. APS07768

D.EI.Ed

Vidya Jyothi D.Ed College,

Rangareddy.

Vidya Jyothi D.Ed College, Plot no. 6105, sy. No. 216/A, 231/ chilkoor village, Moinabad, Rangareddy district- 501 504, Andhra Pradesh managed by VIDYA Jyothi Shiksha Samathi, Plot no. N-6-105, Chilkoor village, Kanakamamidi, Moinabad, Rangareddy district- 501 504, Andhra PradeshVIDYA Jyothi Shiksha Samathi, , Plot no. N-6-105, Chilkoor village, Kanakamamidi, . Moinabad, Rangareddy district- 501 504, Andhra Pradesh has submitted an application for grant of recognition to Vidy Jyothi D.Ed College, Plot no. 6105, sy. No. 216/A, 231/ chilkoor village,


59



APMoinabad, Rangareddy district- 501 504, Andhra Pradesh on 08.07.2011, along with the Court Order directing to consider the application.

Details of Court order dated 30.04.2011 in WP No. 13600 of 2011 in the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh as under:-

VIDYA Jyothi Shiksha Samathi, Andhra Pradesh has filed a Court case vide Writ Petition No. 13600 of 2011 in the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh Verses NCTE-SRC and Secretary School Education Department, Govt. of Andhra Pradesh as 1st and 2nd

respondents respectively against the refusal order. Hon’ ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad has passed an order on 13.04.2011 in WP No. 13600 of 2011 as under:

“ When the matter was taken up for hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petition that the issue involved in this writ petition is similar to the one in W.P 1320 of 2011. Which was disposed of this court on 28.01.2011, whereunder the impugned proceeding were set aside and the respondents were directed to consider the application of the petition afresh by treating the said application for academic year 2011-2012 and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible , preferably within a period of eight weeks.

Since the issue involved in this writ petition is similar to the one in WP no. 1320 of 2011, which was disposed of on 28.01.2011 as above, following the said order, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider the application dtd. 28.12.2006 of the petitioner afresh treating the said same is pending and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight weeks from today. No order as to costs.”

The matter was placed before 208th meeting of SRC wherein SRC considered the matter and decided to file an appeal.As per direction of the SRC a letter was issued to the legal counsel on 18.07.11 to obtain copy of writ petition from Hon’ble High court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad. In response to this office letter dated 18.07.11 our advocate has suggested as under:- “If application of the institution referred in writ petition is pending with NCTE pass orders as per NCTE Act, regulations and following Hon’ble supreme court decision in NCTE Vs Shyam Shiksha Prashikshan Sanstahen and others, if NCTE passed order earlier to filling of the writ petitions and if no application is pending with NCTE then no order are required to be passes.The supreme court has passed in the judgement in Civil Appeal NO. 1125-1128/ 2011 in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidalaya and ors before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India as under:-


60



“An institution is not entitled to recognition unless it fulfils the conditions specified in various clauses of the Regulations. The Council is directed to ensure that in future no institution is granted recognition unless it fulfils the conditions laid down in the Act and the Regulations and the time schedule fixed for processing the application by the Regional Committee and communication of the decision on the issue of recognition it strictly adhered to.

Hence, a letter was issued to our legal counsel on 05.08.2011 with request to inform to Hon’ble High court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad that the matter would be placed before SRC at its next meeting and defend the case in the interest of NCTE and to avoid the contempt case.Note: It is unfortunate that the institution has sought to misinform/mislead the Hon’ble Court stating that the said application was refused/closed/rejected on the ground of the State Govt policy to ban starting of New institutions by giving a WP No. 1320/2011. The issue involved in this matter and matter of W.P. 1320/2011 is different since in this case neither online application nor hard copy has been received earlier for 2011-2012. An application has only been received on 08.07.2011. The office of SRC has asked for a copy of W.P.13600/2011 along with its Annexures as well as certified copy of order dated 30.04.2011 but advocate has not sent the same yet.

The committee decided to inform the institution to resubmit the application with relevant papers for further action. In the absence of valid documents in the file including original application, the issuing of Deficiency letter and refusal order, citing the grounds for refusal order, it is not possible to take action in the matter. The institution be advised to apply through on line and submit Hard copy of application before the cutoff date for 2012-13.

26. APS05360

B.Ed

Pushpageeth Colege of Teacher

Education, Thiruvanathapura

m.

KL

Pushpageeth College of Teacher Education, Thiruvananthapuram District, Kerala.Madhavan Foundation Elimala, Kottoor P.O. Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala has submitted an application in the name of Pushpageeth College of Teacher Education, Thiruvananthapuram District, Kerala for seeking grant of recognition on 31.12.2005.The application was processed and the recognition order was issued to the institution vide order no. F.No.SRO/NCTE/2007-2008/15926 dated 12.12.2007 with the condition to shift the building to own premises within a period of three years.Meantime, the SRC was informed by one of its Members regarding some discrepancy between the actual place of recognition/approval and actual


61



place of functioning of APS05360 of Pushpageeth College of education in Kerala. Considering the above, SRC in its 168th meeting held on 15th

December, 2008 and decided to cause inspection under section 17 of NCTE Act for verification of location and infrastructural and instructional facilities.As per the decision of SRC, a letter was issued on 9.9.2010 to the institution informing the date of inspection between 24th to 25th September, 2010.The institution in its letter dated 20.9.2010 requesting for postponement of inspection.Again a letter was issued to the institution on 19.1.2011 regarding intimating the inspection dated between 7-12 February, 2011.The advocate in its letter dated 9.2.2011 stated that the writ petition came up for hearing on 8.2.1011. The Hon’ble Court was please to dispose of the same directing the respondent to pass orders on Ext.P5 representation filed by the petitioner. The inspection at the petitioner institution is also deferred by the Hon’ble Court. The petitioner is directed to produce a copy of the judgment and copy of the writ petition before the respondent.The institution has submitted judgement dated 8th February, 2011 in W.P.(C) No. 3750 of 2011 on 25.2.2011 stated as follows “in this writ petition what the petitioner seeks is a direction to the respondents to postpone the inspection of the petitioners institution as the permanent building is not yet completed. In my view, no useful purpose will be served by conducting an inspection at this stage. Even according to the petitioner the permanent building is not yet completed. Therefore, it is only appropriate that the inspection should be deferred so that the inspection can be scheduled and conducted as and when permanent facility is available”.Be that as it may it is essentially a matter for the respondent to consider and pass orders in this regard. Therefore on the production of a copy of the judgement along with a copy of the writ petition, respondent will consider Ext.P5, the representation made by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon in the light of what is stated above.Writ petition is disposed of as above”.

The VT members visited the institution and submitted its report on 28.2.2011(copy enclosed), without any particulars being filled in. The VT members have given reason.

A fax letter has been received from the advocate on 12.8.2011 with the request to send the statement of facts of the case. Brief is being sent.

Placed before SRC for decision and direction.

The Committee considered the Court order, VT Report and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show


62



cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following:

As per VT report, despite much resistance from the management (Madhavam Foundation) of the two Pushpageeth institutions at Elimala, Kattoor (PO), thiruvananthapuram, visited the location where permanent infrastructe should have come up and the present premises shifted to. The present rented premises, for which temporary recognition was accorded by the NCTE in May 2005, is at Katakada, about 10 kms away from Elimala.As per the condition stipulated by the NCTE, the temporary rented premises should have been shifted to permanent premises within three years. The institutions is already in the sixth year of existence. But the management has not taken any tangible step to create permanent infrastructure. The visiting team was not given proof of ownership of any land or approved plan of any building. The management took the stand that they need not show or give anything to the visiting team since there was not any inspection in view of the court orders.

In reality, there is no trace of any effort on the part of the management to construct permanent infrastructure at the address given to the NCTE. The visiting teach could only advise them to take earnest steps to comply with NCTE norms instead of dodging the issue through representations and court proceedings. But what shocked the visiting team was that the management, on the other hand, was keen on telling the visiting team to perform its “duties” of just forwarding the court order.

VT recommends that In view of the above and in consideration of the absolute lack of earnestness on the part of the management in fulfilling the conditions, the NCTE-SRC may well decide to withdraw the recognition granted to the two institutions.

This shows the carelessness and negligence on the part of the management. This is against the principle of NCTE act and regulations.

Furtheer, the committee noted that the institution is not ready for inspection, as the permanent building is not yet completed. The petitioner institution has admitted that the permanent building is not yet completed, even after the lapse of more than six years.


63



As per NCTE act and norms, the institution should have shifted to its own building with 3 years from the date of recognition 31.12.2005.

As per Supreme Court judgment in the Civil Appeal NO. 1125-1128/ 2011 in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidalaya and ors before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India as under:-


The institution has clearly violated NCTE Act, norms and regulations. Further, V.T. has clearly recommended in their report to withdraw the recognition granted to the two institutions.


Consideration of Court Cases ( Vol-1 )

27. SRCAPP249B.P.Ed

Sri Venkateshwara .B.P.Ed College

MedkaAP

Sri Venkateswara Educational Society, No.1, Habsipur Road, Dubbak, Medak-502108, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Sri Venkateshwara B.P.Ed College, No.1. Dubbak, Medak 502108, Andhra Pradesh for B.P.Ed course of one year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 25.09.2010. The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government for recommendation on 29.10.2010/04.02.2011. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 7.12.2010 for the


64



following Points

Fixed Deposit Receipt for Rs.500 lakhs of Nationalised Bank Towards Endowment Funds: the institution has submitted photo copy of FDR of Rs.5.00 lakhs towards Endowment funds vide no 946927 dated 18.09.2010 for one year issued by Andhra Bank. Hence the institution is required to submit FDR in original for proposed course for the period of 1 year as per regulations.

Fixed Deposit Receipt for Rs.3.00 lakhs of Natrionalised Bank Towards Reserved fund: the institution has submitted photo copy of FDR of Rs.3.00 lakhs towards Reserved fund vide no. 946928 dated 18.09.2010 for one year issued by Andhra Bank. Hence the institution is required to submit FDR in original for proposed course for the period of 1 year as per regulations.

Building completion certificate: The institution has submitted the building completion certificate which is not issued by local civil authority / Government Engineer and it is not in prescribed format. Hence the institution is required to submit Building completion certificate issued by local civil authority/Government Engineer in prescribed format. (copy enclosed).

Notarized copy of Change of land use Certificate issued by the competent authority: The institution has not submitted the copy of change of land use certificate issued by the competent authority. Hence the institution is required to submit notarized copy of (conversion of land utilization) LUC (Agriculture lands- conversion to Non- Agricultural purposes) issued bt competent authority.

Certified copy of registered land document in the schedule of property does not give of the land etc.

The institution submitted its reply on 04.02.2011 and same was placed in the 202nd SRC meeting held on 14th and 15th March 2011 on careful perusal of the original file of the institution and other related documents, NCTE Act 1993, Regulations and guidelines from time to time laid on the table, written representation from the institution, the Regional Committee decided to reject the application on the following grounds:-

The management is running B.Ed programme, which is granted only on 26.11.2007. Hence the institution is not completed three academic years as per clause 8(3) of Regulation 2009 for additional course i.e., B.P.Ed course.

The institution has submitted FDRs of Rs. 5 lakhs and 3 lakhs for endowment and reserve funds (dt. 18.09.2010) respectively for one year only.

Accordingly the application of Sri Venkateswara Educational Society, No.1,


65



Habsipur Road, Dubbak, Medak-502108 Andhra Pradesh vide order 03.05.2011 was rejected. The Institution preferred an appeal at NCTE Hqrs. Wherein NCTE Hqrs has directed in the order dt. 03.08.2011 as under:

“After perusal of documents, memorandum of the appeal and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council reached conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and set aside order dt.07.04.2011 with direction to the SRC for re- consideration of the entire issue taking decision thereafter. Accordingly , the appeal is accepted and the order of the SRC dtd.07.04.2011 i

The SRC considered the Appeal committee/Council directions dt. 03.08.2011 and decided to process the application and the institution be directed to submit all the relevant original documents.

28. APS0363B.Ed

Best College of Education, West

GodavariAP

Bhushan Educational Society, Tadepalligudem West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Best College of Education, Eluru Revenue Division, 1-31-7, Indane Gas Building, Kadakatla, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari-534101, Andhra Pradesh for B.Ed Course of one year duration under section 15(1) of the NCTE ACT, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 11.02.2002. Recognition was granted to the institution vide SRC order dated 03.03.2003 with a condition to shift the institution to permanent premises.

Shifting of premises as per Regulation 2002 to permanent structure within three year from the date of issue of recognition in Andhra Pradesh. The matter was placed in 178th meeting of SRC held on 13th -14th July, 2010 wherein the Committee observed from records of the institution that the institutions were accorded recognition in the rented premises and they had not yet shifted to the permanent premises/building. In view of non-shifting of colleges to permanent building the committee decided to issue show cause notice under section 17 of NCTE Act and obtain shifting fees and other documents for causing inspection for shifting.

The committee considered the matter and decided to withdraw recognition for the 17 institutions in Andhra Pradesh as all the 17 institutions which were given conditional recognition in temporary premises failed to shift to permanent premises within the prescribed time limit of three years as per the norms, and also they had failed to respond to Show Cause Notices issued by SRC, NCTE long back during 2008-2009.

SRC in its 201st meeting held on 22nd –23rd February, 2011 considered the matter and decided to withdraw recognition to Best College of Education, Eluru Revenue Division, 1-31-7, Indane Gas Building, Kadakatla, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari-534101, Andhra Pradesh which was given conditional recognition in temporary premises and failed to shift to


66



permanent premises within the prescribed time limit of three years as per the norms, and also they had failed to respond to Show Cause Notices issued by SRC, NCTE long back on 28.08.2009.

Accordingly, withdrawal order was issued to the Best College of Education, Eluru Revenue Division, 1-31-7, Indane Gas Building, Kadakatla, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari-534101, Andhra Pradesh for B.Ed Course on 07.04.2011 . The Institution preferred an appeal at NCTE Hqrs., wherein NCTE Hqrs has directed in the order dt. 03.08.2011 as under:

“ After perusal of documents, memorandum of the appeal and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council reached conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and set aside order dt.07.04.2011 with direction to the SRC for re- consideration of the entire issue taking decision thereafter. Accordingly , the appeal is accepted and the order of the SRC dtd.07.04.2011 is reversed”.

The SRC considered the Council/Appeal committee directions dt. 03.08.2011 and decided to direct the institution to re-submit the reply stated to have been submitted by the institution on 9.9.2009 for further re-consideration of the entire issue for taking a decision in the matter.

29. SRCAPP267D.P.Ed

Vedha College of Physical

Education, Kondapak

AP

Vedha Sri Educational Society, Plot no. 12-3-107/2, Kadhar Poora Street, Siddipet, Post- Siddipet, Medak- 502103, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Vedha College of Physical Education, Khasara no. 156/AA, Village- Kondapak, Post- Kondapak, Taluka- Kondapak, Dist-Medak- 502372, Andhra Pradesh for D.P.Ed course of two year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 29.09.2010.

The Application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government for recommendation on 09.11.2010/04.02.2011. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 09.12.2010.

SRC in its 202nd meeting held on 14th and 15th March 2011 considered the matter and on careful perusal of the original file of the Institution and other related documents, NCTE Act 1993, Regulations and guidelines issued from time to time laid on th table, written representation from the institution, the Southern Regional Committee decided to reject the application on the following grounds.

Building plan approved by Panchayat Secretary –No.156/AA. Affidavit submitted in the prescribed format in Rs. 100/- stamp

paper –No.156/AA Certified copy of registered land document issued by SRO,


67



Siddipet for S.No.156/A in the name of Vedha Sri Education Society.

The institution is running HPT course for 50 students and recognition order was issued on 02.02.2009. Hence, the institution is not completed three academic year as per clause 8 (3) of Regulation 2009 for additional course i.e D.P.E.D course.

Accordingly the application of Vedha College of Physical Education,, Khasara no. 156/AA, Village- Kondapak, Post- Kondapak, Taluka- Kondapak, Dist-Medak- 502372, Andhra Pradesh vide order 11.04.2011 was rejected. The Institution preferred to go in for an appeal at NCTE Hqrs., wherein NCTE Hqrs has directed in the order dt. 03.08.2011 as under:“ After perusal of documents, memorandum of the appeal, affidavit and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council reached conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and reverse the SRC’s order dt.11.04.2011 with direction to SRC to issue Show Cause Notice to the institution pointing out the new ground and take further action thereafter. Accordingly, the appeal is accepted and the order of SRC is reversed”.

The Committee considered the Appellate order Dt. 03/08/2011 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Showcause Notice for the following :

The institution is running HPT course for 50 students and recognition order was issued on 02.02.2009. Hence, the institution is not completed three academic year as per clause 8 (3) of Regulation 2009 for additional course i.e., D.P.Ed course.

Building plan approved by Panchayat Secretary –No.156/AA.

Affidavit submitted in the prescribed format in Rs. 100/- stamp paper –No.156/AA

Certified copy of registered land document issued by SRO, Siddipet for S.No.156/A in the name of Vedha Sri Education Society.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Showcause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not refused and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the refusal, based on the records available, with no further notice.


68



30. SRCAPP412D.El.Ed

Pasha College of Education,Hyderabad

AP

Pasha Educational Trust, P. No-8-2-672, Street No-13, V.P.O-Banjara Hills, Taluka-Shaikpet, District-Hyderabad-500034, Andhra Pradesh applied for grant of recognition to Pasha College of Education, P. No-8-2-672, Street No-13, V.P.O-Banjara Hills, Taluka-Shaikpet, District-Hyderabad-500034, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed course of one year duration under section 14 (1) of the NCTE ACT, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 08.10.2010

The application dated 04.10.2010 received on 08.10.2010 for seeking recognition of D.El.Ed course for the session 2011-2012

As per the new regulation, 2009 no institution shall be granted recognition under these regulation unless the institution of Society sponsoring the institution is in possession of required land on the date of application. The land free from all encumbrances could be either on ownership basis or on lease for running any teacher training course.

The institution have submitted the application along with private lease deed which is against NCTE Regulation 2009.

Therefore the lease deed was not acceptable as per clause 8(7) (I) of Regulation 2009. Hence the application submitted by the institution for D.El.Ed course is returned along with original application and FDR of five lakhs and three lakhs on 25.01.2011. The institution preferred an appeal to NCTE-Hqrs. The appellate authority has passed in its order dated 03.08.2011. The council did not accept the reason for condonation of delay, for consideration of the appeal.

The Regional committee has noted the Council order Dt. 03.08.2011.

31. SRCAPP327B.Ed

Trinity College of Education,

VishakapatnamAP

St Stephen Educational Society, II Floor, SatyaSurya Complex, Dwarakanagar, Visakhapatnam-530016, Andhra Pradesh. had applied for grant of recognition to Trinity College of Education 139, P No 2 Street No 1, Singannabanda, Tagarapuvalasa, Bheemunilpatnam, Vishakhapatnam-531162 Andhra Pradesh for B.Ed course of one year duration under section 15(1) of the NCTE ACT, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 06.10.2010.

The application was processed and the deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 10.12.2010. The institution not submitted reply on deficiency letter within 60 days as per stipulated in clause 7(1), Regulation 2009.

The SRC considered the matter in its 201st meeting held on 22nd –23rd

February, 2011 and on careful perusal of the original file of the institution and other related documents, NCTE Act 1993. Regulations and guidelines from time to time laid on the table, written representation from the


69



institution, the Regional committee decided to reject the application on the following grounds:- The institution has not replied to the deficiency letter even after a lapse

of stipulated time of 60 days as per clause 7(1), Regulation 2009.

Now therefore the application of Trinity College of Education 139, P No 2, Street No 1, Singannabanda, Tagarapuvalasa, Bheemunipatnam,

Vihakhapatnam-531162 Andra Pradesh for permission to B.Ed course is hereby rejected

Accordingly, rejection order was issued to the applicant institution on 23.03.2011 as per direction of Regional committee. The institution preferred to go in for an appeal at NCTE, Hqrs. As per the directions of Hqrs vide letter received on 28.04.2011, the original document of the Institution was sent o Hqrs for appeal vide letter dt.09.05.2011. NCTE Hqrs, vide order dt.20.07.2011 accepted the appeal and the order of SRC is received.

The SRC considered the Council directions Dt. 06.07.2011 and decided to consider the reply Dt. 13.1.2011 furnished by the institution to the deficiency letter to take appropriate decision in accordance with the provisions in the NCTE Act and regulations.

32. APS00248B.Ed

Rabindranatha Tagore College of

Education, Rangareddy.

AP

Rabindranath Tagore Educational Society submitted an application for grant of recognition B.Ed Course and recognition was granted to the institution vide SRC order dated 03.07.2003 at Rabindranath Tagore College of Education,Chevella Revenue Division, Kummera Village Rangareddy - 501 503 Andhra Pradesh.

Shifting of premises as per regulation 2002 to permanent structure within three year from the date of issue of recognition in Andhra Pradesh.

The above matter was placed in 178th meeting of SRC held on 13th – 147th

July, 2010 where in the committee observed from the records of the institutions were accorded recognition in the rented premises and they had not yet shifted to permanent premises/building. In view of non shifting of colleges to permanent building the committee decided to issue show cause notice under section 17 of NCTE Act and obtain shifting fees and other document for causing inspection for shifting.

As per the direction of Regional Committee Shoe Cause Notice was issued with request to submit following document with in 21 days of receipt of letter.

1. Demand Draft of Rs.40000/- towards inspection fee in favour of “The Member Secretary, NCTE” payable at Bangalore should be


70



submitted.2. Land document of new building/location for having own land in the

name of the Institution/Society/Trust.3. Building plan of the new building duly approved by the Government

authority.4. Building Completion Certificate from the Government authority in

the Prescribed format ( Format enclosed ) 5. Land usage Certificate from the concerned Government authorities

stating that the land is exclusively permitted / sanctioned for educational Purposes only should be submitted.

6. Encumbrance Certificate from the competent Government should be submitted.

7. Fixed Deposits Receipts of Rs. 5 Lakhs Kept in JOINT ACCOUNT with SRC in Nationalized Bank for a period of 5 years towards Endowment fund in ORIGINAL should be submitted.

8. Fixed Deposits Receipts of Rs. 3 Lakhs Kept in JOINT ACCOUNT with SRC in Nationalized Bank for a period of 5 years towards Reserve funds in ORIGINAL should be submitted.

9. Certificate of registration / Bye-law of the Society/Trust should be submitted.

10. The affidavit in Rs. 100/- stamp paper In the prescribed format with Notary attestation should be submitted regarding land and building.

As per the perusal of the file the institution and as per the statement enclosed the institution has not submitted reply even after lapse of more than one year.

The Southern Regional committee in its 201st meeting held on 22nd – 23rd February 2011 considered the matter and decided to Withdraw the recognition for the above 17 institutions in Andhra Pradesh as all the above 17 institutions in Andhra Pradesh as all the above 17 institutions which were given conditional recognition in temporary premises failed to shift to permanent premises within the prescribed time limit of three years as per the norms, and also they had failed to respond to Show cause Notices issued by SRC, NCTE long back during 2008-2009.

Accordingly the application of Sri Rabindranath Tagore College of Education,Chevella Revenue Division, Kummera Village Rangareddy - 501 503 Andhra Pradesh was rejected vide order 07.04.2011. The Institution preferred for go to appeal at NCTE Hqrs. Where in NCTE Hqr. Has directed in order dated 03.08.2011 as under :“After perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, VT report and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to


71



accept the appeal and reverse the SRC’s order dated 07.04.2011 with a direction to the conduct an inspection of the institution and take appropriate action thereafter. Accordingly, the appeal is accepted and the order of the SRC dated 07.04.2011 is reversed”.

The SRC considered the Appellate authority order Dt.03.08.2011 and all the relevant documents of the institution and decided to cause inspection at the premises Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. The institution is directed to submit the following within 30 days of the receipt of the notice, all the necessary documents for land, building approval and completion certificate from a competent Govt. Engineer and other relevant documents along with Demand Draft of Rs.40,000/- inspection fee towards the B.Ed course in favour of “The Member Secretary, NCTE” payable at Bangalore.

33. APS00354B.Ed

Intel Institute of Teacher Training

RangareddyAP

Intel Educational Society, D.No. 2/200, 3rd Road, New town, Ananthpur – 515004, Andhra Pradesh submitted the application for grant of recognition for B.Ed course and recognition was granted to Intel Educational Society, D.No. 2/200, 3rd Road, New town, Ananthpur – 515004Andhra Pradesh SRC order dated 04.04.2003 (as per recognition order) with condition to shift the institution to permanent premises.

The matter was placed in 178th meeting of SRC held on 13th – 14th

July, 2010 where in the committee observed from the records of the institutions were accorded recognition in the rented premises and they had not yet shifted to the permanent premises/building. In view of non-shifting of colleges to permanent building the committee decided to issue Show cause Notice under section 17 of NCTE Act and obtain shifting fees and other document for causing inspection for shifting.

As per the direction of Regional Committee Shoe Cause Notice was issued with request to submit following document with in 21 days of receipt of letter.

1. Demand Draft of Rs.40000/- towards inspection fee in favour of “The Member Secretary, NCTE” payable at Bangalore should be submitted.

2. Land document of new building/location for having own land in the name of the Institution/Society/Trust.

3. Bbuilding plan of the new building duly approved by the Government authority.

4. Building Completion Certificate from the Government authority in the Prescribed format ( Format enclosed )


72



5. Land usage Certificate from the concerned Government authorities stating that the land is exclusively permitted / sanctioned for educational Purposes only should be submitted.

6. Encumbrance Certificate from the competent Government should be submitted.

7. Fixed Deposits Receipts of Rs. 5 Lakhs Kept in JOINT ACCOUNT with SRC in Nationalized Bank for a period of 5 years towards Endowment fund in ORIGINAL should be submitted.

8. Fixed Deposits Receipts of Rs. 3 Lakhs Kept in JOINT ACCOUNT with SRC in Nationalized Bank for a period of 5 years towards Reserve funds in ORIGINAL should be submitted.

9. Certificate of registration / Bye-law of the Society/Trust should be submitted.

10. The affidavit in Rs. 100/- stamp paper In the prescribed format with Notary attestation should be submitted regarding land and building.

As per the perusal of the file the institution have not shifted to permanent premises as per norms and standards and conditions mentioned in recognition order dated 04.04.2003/ not communicated the shifting of premises to the SRC and not paid the prescribed fees for shifting premises.

SRC in its 201st meeting held on 22nd – 23rd February, 2011 consideration the matter and decided to Withdraw he recognition to Intel Educational Society, D.No. 2/200, 3rd Road, New town, Ananthpur – 515004, Andhra Pradesh which fail to shift to permanent premises within prescribed time limit of three years as per the norms, and also they had failed to respond to Show Cause Notice.

Accordingly the application of Intel Educational Society, D.No. 2/200, 3rd Road, New town, Ananthpur – 515004Andhra Pradesh was rejected vide order 07.04.2011. The Institution preferred for go to appeal at NCTE Hqrs. Where in NCTE Hqr. has directed in order dated 03.08.2011 as under:

“After perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, VT report and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and set aside SRC’s order dated 07.04.2011 with a direction to the SRC to trace the reply of the institution and if not available, obtain a copy of the


73



same with all relevant document including fee or inspection from the appellant and take further action thereafter. Accordingly, the appeal is accepted and the order of the SRC dated 07.04.2011 is reversed”.

The SRC Considered the Council direction Dt. 03.08.2011 and decided to direct the institution to submit a copy of reply supposed to have submitted to the show cause notice issued by SRC on 07.08.2009, with all relevant documents including fee for inspection from the institution to take further action.

34. SRCAPP332B.P.Ed

Siddamurthy Mallikarjuna

Reddy College of Physical

Education,Prakasham

AP

Sri Sai Educational Society, Plot No. 1-247A, Village – somaraju Palli, Post – Singharayakonda, Taluka – Singharayakonda Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Siddamurthy Mallikarjuna Reddy College of Physical Education, No. 1-247A, Village – somaraju Palli, Post – Singharayakonda, Taluka – Singharayakonda Andhra Pradesh for B.P.Ed course of one year duration under section 15 (1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern regional Committee, NCTE on 01.10.2010..

The application was processed and deficiency letter was issued institution on 07.12.2010. The institution submitted its written representation on 10.01.2011. SRC considered the matter in its 202nd meeting held on 14th – 15th March, 2011 and on careful perusal of the original file of the institution and other related documents, NCTE Act 1993, Regulations and guidelines from time to time laid on the table, written representation from the institution, the Regional Committee decided to reject the application on the following grounds:-

1. As per land document, the total land area is 4.96 acres, which is less than required land for B.P.Ed course as per regulation. 8 acres land required for B.P.Ed course as per the NCTE regulations.

2. The Built up area is only 15593 sq.ft which is inadequate as per NCTE Norms.

3. Building Completion Certificate is not in proper format issued by the competent authority

Accordingly rejection order was issued to the applicant institution on 11.04.2011 as per direction of Regional Committee

Accordingly the application of Siddamurthy Mallikarjuna Reddy College of Physical Education, No. 1-247A, Village – somaraju Palli, Post – Singharayakonda, Taluka – Singharayakonda Andhra Pradesh was rejected vide order 11.04.2011. The Institution preferred for go to appeal at NCTE Hqrs. Where in NCTE Hqr. Has directed in order dated 03.08.2011 as under :


74



“After perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, Affidavit and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and reverse the SRC’s order dated 11-04-2011 with a direction to SRC to process the case further. Accordingly, the appeal is accepted and the order of the SRC is reversed.

The SRC considered the Council directions Dt. 03.08.2011 and decided to process the application of the institution further.

35. APS00296B.Ed

Alininneti Madava Reddy Memorial

College of Education, Nalgonda

AP

Vignana Bharathi Educational Society, Nalgonda district, Andhra radish had applied for grant of recognition to Alimineti Madhava Reddy Memorial College of Education, Bhongir Revenue Division, Choutuppal, Nalgonda District-508252, Andhra Pradesh for B.Ed course of one year duration under section 15(10) of NCTE ACT, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 31.12.2001

Vignana Bharathi Educational Society submitted the application for grant of recognition for B.Ed course and recognition was granted to the institution vide SRC order dated 08.04.2003 at to Alimineti Madhava Reddy Memorial College of Education, Bhongir Revenue Division, Choutuppal, Nalgonda District-508252, Andhra Pradesh (as per recognition order) with condition to shift the institution to permanent premises.

The matter was placed in 178th meeting of SRC held on 13th – 14th July, 2010 where in the committee observed from the records of the institutions were accorded recognition in the rented premises and they had not yet shifted to the permanent premises/building. In view of non-shifting of colleges to permanent building the committee decided to issue Show cause Notice under section 17 of NCTE Act and obtain shifting fees and other document for causing inspection for shifting.

SRC in its 201st meeting held on 22nd – 23rd February, 2011 considered the matter and decided to withdraw the recognition to Alimineti Madhava Reddy Memorial College of Education, Bhongir Revenue Division, Choutuppal, Nalgonda District-508252, Andhra Pradesh which fail to shift to permanent premises within the prescribed time limit of three years as per the norms, and also they had failed to respond to Show cause Notice issued by SRC, NCTE long back on 28.08.2009.

As per the file the institution have not shifted to permanent premises as per norms and standards and conditions mentioned in recognition order dated 08.04.2003 not communicated the shifting of premises to the SRC and not paid the prescribed fees for shifting of premises


75



Accordingly the application of Alimineti Madhava Reddy Memorial College of Education, Bhongir Revenue Division, Choutuppal, Nalgonda District-508252, Andhra Pradesh was rejected vide order 07.04.2011. The Institution preferred for go to appeal at NCTE Hqrs. Where in NCTE Hqr. Has directed in order dated 03.08.2011 as under :

“After perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, VT report and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and reverse the SRC’s order dated 07.04.2011 with a direction to the SRC to trace the reply of the institution and if not available, obtain a copy of the same from the appellant and take further action thereafter. Accordingly, the appeal is accepted and the order of the SRC dated 07.04.2011 is reversed”.

The institution has not submitted any written representation as per appeal order.

The SRC considered the Council directions Dt. 03.08.2011 and decided to direct the institution to submit a copy of the reply supposed to have submitted to the show cause notice Dt. 28/8/2009, with all relevant documents to take further action.

36. APS02125D.EdSri

Markandeshwara D.Ed College

BellaryKA

Sri Markandeshwara D.Ed College, Bellary District, Karnataka

Sri Markandeshwara D.Ed College, 90/A, Sadashiva Nagar, Ananthasayan Gudi, Hospet, Bellary District, Karnataka has been granted recognition for offering D.Ed course with an intake of 50 students vide order dated 29.11.2004. with the condition to shift the permit to own building.

The institution in its letter dated 18.09.2007 has submitted a proposal for shifting of premises along with 40,000/- towards shifting fee. Accordingly, inspection was carried out on 28th October 2010. The inspection report has been received on 01.11.2010.

The SRC in its 198th meeting held on 24-26 November 2010 considered the VT report, VCD and other relevant documentary evidences and decided to issue show cause notice for the following reasons:

As per VT report, the management is running D.Ed programme and also running a primary and higher secondary school in the same building/premises, which is not permissible as per NCTE norms.

As per the VT report, VCD and all the relevant documents, it is clear that the building is incomplete and the institution is running the D.Ed. programme in a building which is partly roofed with asbestos sheets, which is against the NCTE Norms.


76



Original Affidavit of Rs. 100/- is not submitted.

FDRs of Rs. 5 lakhs and 3 lakhs in joint names from a Nationalized Bank for a period of 5 years is to be submitted.

Non-encumbrance Certificate from the competent Government Authorised person / Authority. To be submitted.

Lease documents of English version is to be submitted.

Accordingly, Show cause notice was issued to the institution on 03.01.2011.The institution has submitted its written representation on 27.01.2011. The committee in its 201st meeting held on 22nd-23rd February, 2011 considered the reply submitted by the institution and found the reply to be unsatisfactory and unconvincing and decided to withdraw recognition for D.Ed (APS02125) course with effect from 2012-13, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.Ed course, if any, to complete their course.

But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order. The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.

Further, decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited with SRC NCTE, Bangalore if any.

Accordingly, order of withdrawing recognition was issued to the institution vide its order no F.SRO/NCTE/2010-2011/27851 dated 25.03.2011.

Aggrieved by the withdrawal order of SRC the institution preferred appeal to NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order no. F.No.89-236/2011 Appeal/5th Meeting-2011 A40608 dated 03.08.2011 the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and set aside SRC’s order dated 25.03.2011 with a direction to the SRC for re- consideration of the case and issuing speaking order of withdrawing recognition. Accordingly, the appeal is accepted and the order of the SRC dated 25.03.2011 is reversed.

The SRC considered the Council directions Dt. 03.08.2011 and decided to process and reconsider the reply to the show cause notice and to take decision in the matter.

37. APS01901B.Ed

K.K. College of

K.K. Educational and Charitable Trust, No.19/1A, 11th K.M. Kanakapura Road, Kinankunte Post, (Near Delhi Public School), Bangalore-560062, Karnataka had applied for grant of recognition to K.K. College of Education, Vasanthpur Road, Konanakunte Cross, Bangalore-


77



Education, Bangalore

KA

560062, Karnataka for B.Ed Course of one year duration on 31.12.2003.K.K. College of Education, K.K.Educational and Charitable Trust, Vasanthapur Road, Konanakunte Cross, Bangalore-560062, Karnataka has been granted recognition for offering B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students vide order dated 29.11.2004. with the condition to shift the permit into own building.

The institution in its letter dated 25.10.2007 has submitted a proposal for shifting of premises along with Rs.40, 000/- towards shifting fee. The inspection was carried out on 27th October 2010. The inspection received on 29.10.2010 along with VCD.

The SRC in its 198th meeting held on 24-26 November 2010 considered the VT report and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to issue show cause notice. Accordingly, Show cause notice was issued on 11.01.2011 for the following reasons:

The institution is functioning in a multistoried building which is being shared for running management and Commerce Colleges. This is a gross violation of norms on the part of the management to share with other colleges.

The affidavit is being signed by a different person and land area and Survey Nos are different.

The latest Building Completion Certificate from the competent Government Engineer has not been submitted.

Rs. 5 Lakhs FDR expired on 13.10.2010. Fresh FDR for Rs. 5 lakhs to be submitted.

The institution has submitted its written representation on 28.01.2011.

The committee in its 201st meeting held on 22nd-23rd February, 2011 considered the reply submitted by the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for D.Ed course (APS01901) with effect from 2012-13, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.Ed course, if any, to complete their course.

But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order. The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.



78



Aggrieved by the withdrawal order of SRC the institution preferred appeal to NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order no. F.No.89-248/2011 Appeal/5th Meeting-2011 A40540 dated 03.08.2011 the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and set aside SRC’s order dated 25.03.2011 with a direction to the SRC for re- consideration of the entire matter and taking decision thereafter. Accordingly, the appeal is accepted and the order of the SRC dated 25.03.2011 is reversed.

The SRC considered the Council directions Dt. 03.08.2011 and decided to process the application and the institution be directed to submit all the relevant original documents.

38. SRCAPP265M.Ed.

Tamil University Department of

Education, Thanjur

TN

Tamil University, Dept of Education, Thanjavur, Tamilnadu

Tamil University, Department of Education, Thanjavur, Tamilnadu has submitted application for M.Ed course on 05.10.2010. The application of the institution was processed and deficiency letter was issued on 07.01.2011. The institution did not submit its written representation even after completion of stipulated period of 60 days as per regulation 2009. SRC in its 202nd meeting held on 14-15 March 2011 considered the matter and decided to refuse recognition. Accordingly, refusal order was issued to the institution on 18.04.2011. The institution preferred appeal to NCTE, Hqrs and the Appellate Authority vide order dt.03.08.2011 has reversed the refusal order of SRC with a direction to consider the reply submitted by the institution and taking decision thereafter.

The SRC considered the Council directions Dt. 03.08.2011 and decided to reconsider the entire case and to issue speaking order in the matter.

39. SRCAPP271B.Ed, Suguna

College of Educatin, Chennai

TN

Suguna Solomon Educational Trust, Suguna College of Education, Arumbakam, Chennai, Tamilnadu.

Suguna Solomon Educational Trust, Suguna College of Education, Arumbakam, Chennai, Tamilnadu has submitted application for B.Ed course on 05.10.2010. The application of the institution was processed and deficiency letter was issued on 07.01.2011. The institution did not submit its written representation even after completion of stipulated period of 60 days as per regulation 2009. SRC in its 202nd meeting held on 14-15 March 2011 considered the matter and decided to refuse recognition. Accordingly, refusal order was issued to the institution on 18.04.2011. The institution preferred appeal to NCTE, Hqrs and the Appellate Authority vide order dt.03.08.2011 has reversed the refusal order of SRC with a direction to consider the reply submitted by the institution and taking decision thereafter.


79



The SRC considered the Council directions Dt. 03.08.2011 and decided to consider the reply submitted by the institution to take further decision in the matter.

40. APS07035B.EdShri,

Nagaappana Karjagi D.Ed

College, BelgaumKA

Shri.Nagappana Karjagi D.Ed College, Belgaum District, Karnataka

Sree Beereshwara Shikshana Samsthe, Sankeshwara – 501313. Hukkeri Taluk, Belgaum District, Karnataka was granted recognition for offering D.Ed course (Kannada Medium) with an intake of 50 students from the session 2004-2005 vide order dated 02.12.2004 bearing code No. APS02336. Further, Shri.Nagappana Karajagi D.Ed College, Sree Beereshwara Shikshana Samsthe, Behind Syrian Hospital, P.B.Road, Sankeshwar – 591313, Hukkeri Taluk, Belgaum District, Karnataka was also granted recognition for offering D.Ed course (Marathi Medium) with an intake of 50 students vide order dated 26.04.2007 bearing code No.APS07035 with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years of recognition.

NCTE, Hqrs vide its letter dated 11.10.2010 has forwarded a copy of the inspection report dated 21.05.2010 conducted Under Section 13 of NCTE Act. As there are deficiencies pointed out in the inspection report, NCTE, Hqrs has requested SRC to initiate action against the institution Under Section 17 of the NCTE Act immediately.

The SRC in its 197th meeting held on 13-14 October 2010 considered the VT report and decided to issue Show cause notice for both courses. Accordingly, Show cause notice was issued to the institution on 13.12.2010. The institution has submitted its written representation on 10.01.2011 and 17.01.2011.

Since the main file were not available, a part file was opened in which reply to our notice dated 13.12.2010 was processed and placed before SRC in its 200th meeting held on 20-21 January 2011. SRC decided to issue Final Show cause notice on 11.03.2011 for which the institution has submitted its written representation on 11.04.2011.

But in 201st meeting held on 22-23 February 2011 both the original files were traced and the part file got misplaced and accordingly, agenda not highlighting the contents of Final Show cause Notice dated 11.03.2011 were placed before SRC and SRC decided to withdrawal recognition. As such no provision for reviewing/revising its own decision by the Regional Committee.The committee has decided to re-confirm the decision which was taken earlier in the 201st meeting held on 22-23 Feb 2011, for withdrawal of recognition of the institution.


80




Aggrieved by the withdrawal order of SRC the institution preferred appeal to NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order no. F.No.89-232/2011 Appeal/5th Meeting-2011 A40504 dated 03.08.2011 the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and set aside SRC’s order dated 25.03.2011 with a direction to the SRC for reconsider of the replies of the institution to the show cause notice issued and take a fresh decision in the matter at the earliest. Accordingly, the appeal is accepted and the order of the SRC dated 25.03.2011 is reversed.In obedience to the appeal order the reply of the institution is again verified .The committee considered the appellate authority order Dt. 03.08.2011 and reply submitted by the institution and decided to restore recognition of the institution.

41. SRCAPP399B.Ed-Al

Sri. Balaji College of Education,

TirunelveliTN

Sri Balaji College of Education, Cherenkoilpathu, Ambasamudrum, Tirunelveli, Tamilnadu

Sri Balaji College of Education, Cherenkoilpathu, Ambasamudrum, Tirunelveli, Tamilnadu has submitted application for B.Ed-AI course on 06.10.2010. The application of the institution was processed and deficiency letter was issued on 07.01.2011. The institution did not submit its written representation even after completion of stipulated period of 60 days as per regulation 2009. SRC in its 202nd meeting held on 14-15 March 2011 considered the matter and decided to refuse recognition. Accordingly, refusal order was issued to the institution on 18.04.2011.

The institution preferred appeal to NCTE, Hqrs and the Appellate Authority vide order dt.03.08.2011 has confirmed the refusal order of SRC.

The committee has noted the Appellate Authority order Dt. 03.08.2011, confirming the Southern Regional Committee order.

42. SRCAPP374B.Ed

Abdul Kalam College of Education,

Guntur.AP

Priyanka Education Society D.No. 13/4/53/25, Kotappakonda Road, Narasarapet, Guntur-522601, AndhraPradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Abdul Kalam College of Education, D.No. 120/B, 001, Jonnalagadda, Narasarapet, Guntur-522601, Andhrapradesh, for B.Ed course of one year duration under section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Sourthern Regional Committee, NCTE on 07.10.2010.

The application was processed and the deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 09.12.2010. The institution not submitted reply of deficiency letter within 60 days as stipulated in clause 7 (1), Regulation 2009.

The SRC considered the matter in its 201st meeting held on 29th-30th March


81



2010 and on careful perusal of the original file of the institution and other related documents, NCTE Act 1993, regulations and guidelines from time to time laid on the table, written representation from the institution, the Regional Committee decided to reject the application on the following grounds:

1/ The institution has not repied to the deficiency letters even after lapse of stipulated time of 60 days as per clause 7 (1), Regulations 2009.

The application of Abdul Kalam College of Education D.No. 120/B, 001, Jonnalagadda, Narasarapet, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, for permission to B.Ed course was rejected vide Order Dt. 23.03.2011.

The institution went for an appeal to the NCTE New Delhi under sention 18 of the NCTE Act 1993 against the rejection order Dt. 23.03.2011 of SRC NCTE Bangalore.

After perusal of documents, memorandum of appea, affidavit and after considering oral arguments advanced during hearing, the council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and hence it should be rejected. Accoringly, the appeal is rejected and SRC’s order dated 23.3.2011 is confirmed.


43. SRCAPP370B.Ed

Jadcheria College of Education, Mahbubnagar

AP

Jadcherla College of Education, Mahabubnagar, Andhra Pradesh submitted an application to SRC-NCTE for grant of recognition for B.Ed course on

The Application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government for recommendation on 08.11.2010/02.02.2011 . A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 09.12.2010 for the following Points.

Certified copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent authority: the institution has submitted the registered land documents in Telugu version and it is not notarized by competent authority. Hence the institution should submit the notarized copy of registred land documents issued by the competent authority in English version.

Affidavit in the prescribed form on Rs 100/ stamp paper duly attested ny oath commissioner or notary public, stating the precise location of the land (village, district, state etc) the total area in possession, the permission of the competent authority to use the land for educational purpose and mode of possession i.e. ownership or lease: the institution has submitted photocopy of affidavit


82



of Rs 100/- stamp paper duly attested by oath commissioner or notary public. Hence the institution is required to submit original affidavit of Rs.100/- stamp paper, in original and also specify total area and built up area.

Notarized copy of change of land use certificate issued by the competent authority: The institution has submitted the copy of change of land use certificate issued by the competent authority but it is not Notarized. Hence the institution is required to submit notarized copy of (conversion of land utilization) LUC (Agriculture lands- conversion to Non-Agricultural purposes) issued by revenue authority.

Building completion certificate: the institution has submitted the building completion certificate issued by private Engineer. Hence the institution is required to submit Building completion certificate issued by local civil authority in prescribed format. (copy enclosed).

Building Plan: duly approved by local civil authority- corporation/municipal/ Panchayat as the case may be to be submitted.

As per BCC it is having area of 4200 sq.ft with AC sheet roofing.

The status of other documents as per clause 7(1) of Regulation 2009 is given below:

FDRs of Rs.5 lakhs and Rs.3 lakhs submitted from Bank of India Minority status letter dated 12.10.2010 for 2010-11 to 2012-13

On careful perusal of the original file of the institution and other related documents, Act of NCTE, 1993, regulations and guidelines from time to time laid on the table, written representation from the institution, the Regional Committee decided to reject the application on the following grounds. As per Building Completion Certificate, it is having area of 4200 sq.ft.

With Asbestos sheets roofing. Building completion certificate is submitted, which is not approved by

competent approved Govt. Engineer.

Refusal of recognition order was issued to the applicant institution on 11.04.2011 as per direction of regional committee.

The institution went for an appeal to the NCTE New Delhi under sention 18 of the NCTE Act 1993 against the rejection order Dt. 11.04.2011 of SRC NCTE Bangalore.

After perusal of documents, memorandum of appea, affidavit and after considering oral arguments advanced during hearing, the council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and hence it should be rejected. Accoringly, the appeal is rejected and SRC’s order dated 11.04.2011 is confirmed.


83




44. SRCAPP407M.Ed

Guthikonda Sreeramulu,

M.Ed College of Education,

NelloreAP

Guthikonda Sreeramlu College of Education, Nellore, AndhraPradesh submitted an application to SRC-NCTE for grant of recognition for M.Ed. course on 07/10/2010. The Application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government for recommendation on 09.11.2010/04.02.2011. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 10.12.2010 for the following Points. Fixed Deposit Receipt for Rs 5.00 lakhs of Nationalized bank towards

Endowment funds- the institution has submitted the FDR of Rs 5.00 lakhs towards Endowment fund vide no 280265 dated 28.09.2010 for one year issued by Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank. Hence the institution is required to submit FDR in original for proposed course from a Nationalized bank as per regulation.

Fixed Deposit Receipt for Rs 3.00 lakhs of Nationalized bank towards Reserved fund - the institution has submitted the FDR of Rs 3.00 lakhs towards Reserved fund vide no 280266 dated 28.09.2010 for one year issued by Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank. Hence the institution is required to submit FDR in original for proposed course from a Nationalized bank as per regulation.

Certified copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent authority :- The institution has submitted photocopy of the sale deed, but not certified by the competent authority. Hence, the institution is required to submit certified copy of the Land Documents issued by the Office of the Sub Registrar or competent issuing authority.

Approved building plan by the competent civil authority :- Institution has submitted approve building plan but not mention plot no. Hence the institution is required to submit fresh approved building plan. wherein it should be clearly mentioning i.e. Khasra no, plot no, proposed course, total area, built up area duly approved by competent authority with resolution in all respect either or English or Hindi language. If the institution has running other teacher education courses/ other technical courses in the same premises then, the institution shall submit earmarked area for proposed course with total area and built up area.

Notarized copy of Change of land use Certificate issued by the competent authority - the institution has submitted the copy of change of land use certificate issued by the competent authority but it is not Notarized. Hence the institution is required to submit notarized copy of (conversion of land utilization) LUC (Agriculture lands – conversion to Non – Agricultural purpose) issued by competent authority.

NAAC Certificate :- The institution has not submitted NAAC certificate with B. Grade for proposed course. Hence the institution is required to submit NAAC certificate with B. Grade.

Building completion certificate:- The institution has submitted the


84



building completion certificate issued by local civil authority but it is not in prescribed format. Hence the institution is required to submit Building completion certificate issued by local civil authority in prescribed format. (copy enclosed).

The institution is required to complete three academic sessions in case of M.Ed Course. Hence the institution is required clarify the same.

The status of other documents as per clause 7(1) of Regulation 2009 is given below:

Affidavit submitted in the prescribed format in Rs. 100/- stamp paper – K.No.1055, 1056, 1057, 1058

The institution is running B.Ed college for 100 students and recognition order was issued on 12.04.2007. On careful perusal of the original file of the institution and other related documents, Act of NCTE, 1993, regulations and guidelines from time to time laid on the table, written representation from the institution, the Regional Committee decided to reject the application on the following grounds. National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) with ‘B’ Grade

Certificate is not submitted. Certified copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent

authority is not submitted. Approved building plan by the competent civil authority is not submitted.

Accordingly, withdrawal order was issued to the applicant institution on 11.04.2011 as per direction of regional committee.

The institution went for an appeal to the NCTE New Delhi under sention 18 of the NCTE Act 1993 against the rejection order Dt. 11/04/2011 of SRC NCTE Bangalore.

After perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after considering oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and hence it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected and SRC’s order dt. 11.04.2011 is confirmed


45. SRCAPP218

M.Ed

Sri Sai Baba National College of Education, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh submitted an application to SRC-NCTE for grant of recognition for M.Ed course on 13.09.2010


85



Sri Sai Baba National College,

Anantapur.

AP

The Application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government for recommendation on 02.11.2010/04.02.2011 A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 07.12.2010 for the following Points.Fixed Deposit Receipt for Rs 5.00 lakhs of Nationalized bank towards Endowment funds- the institution has submitted photo copy of FDR of Rs 5.00 lakhs towards Endowment funds vide no 785015 dated 27.08.10 for five years issued by Canara Bank. Hence the institution is required to submit FDR in original as per regulation. Fixed Deposit Receipt for Rs 3.00 lakhs of Nationalized bank

towards Reserved fund - the institution has submitted photo copy of FDR of Rs 3.00 lakhs towards Reserved fund vide no 785016 dated 27.08.10 for five year issued by Canara Bank. Hence the institution is required to submit FDR in original as per regulation.

Certified copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent authority :- The institution has submitted photocopy of the Sale Deed, but not certified by the competent authority. Hence, the institution is required to submit certified copy of the Land Documents issued by the Office of the Registrar or competent issuing authority.

Approved building plan by the competent civil authority :- Institution has submitted building plan approved but not approved by civil authority. If the institution has running other teacher education courses/ other technical courses in the same premises then, the institution shall submit earmarked area for proposed course with total area and built up area. Notarized copy of Change of land use Certificate issued by the

competent authority - the institution has not submitted land use certificate . Hence the institution is required to submit notarized copy of CLU (Agriculture lands -conversion of Non - Agricultural purpose) issued by Revenue Department.

The institution is required to three academic session completed in case of M.Ed Course. Hence the institution is required clarify the same. Building completion certificate:- The institution has not submitted building completion certificate in prescribed format. Hence the institution is required to Building completion certificate in prescribed format. ( copy enclosed)

On careful perusal of the original file of the institution and other related documents, Act of NCTE, 1993, regulations and guidelines from time to time laid on the table, written representation from the institution, the Regional Committee decided to reject the application on the following grounds.

The institution is running B.Ed course and recognition order was issued only on 22.08.2008. Hence the institution has not completed three academic year as per Clause 8(3) of Regulations 2009 for additional course i.e., M.Ed course.


86



The institution went for an appeal to the NCTE New Delhi under sention 18 of the NCTE Act 1993 against the rejection order Dt. 11/04/2011 of SRC NCTE Bangalore.

After perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after considering oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and hence it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected and SRC’s order dt. 11.04.2011 is confirmed.


Consideration of the Reply to Show Cause Notice : (VOL- 3)

Sl.No

CodeCourse


State

Remarks of SRC

46. APSO3798D.T.Ed

Palaniammal Teacher Training Institute, Coimbatore.

TN

PALANIAMMAL TEACHER TRAINING INSTIUTE, COIMBATORE DISTRICT, TAMILNADU.Palaniammal Teacher Training Institute, V. Kaliapurm Post, Vettaikkaran Pudur Via, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore District, Tamilnadu was granted recognition for offering D.T.Ed course on 08.12.2005.The institution vide its letter dated 01.06.2010 submitted proposal for shifting to new premises alongwith Rs. 40000/-. The inspection of the institution for shifting of premises was carried out on 13.11.2010. The Committee in its 198th meeting held on 24th-26th November 2010 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, showcause notice was issued to the institution on 06.01.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 07.02.2011.The Committee in its 201st meeting held on 22nd-23rd February 2011 considered the reply to Show Cause Notice, VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Final Show cause Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly final show cause notice was issued on 22.03.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 21.04.2011.In the mean time NCTE, Hqrs vide its letter dated 11.04.2011 has forwarded a copy of the inspection report dated 24.09.2010 conducted Under Section 13 of NCTE Act.The matter is placed before SRC in its 204th meeting held on 27th-28th April 2011 along with letter from NCTE, Hqrs, VT report U/S 13 of NCTE Act,


87



reply to notice and original file for decision and direction. The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Final Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a final show cause notice was issued to the institution on 01.06.2011, the institution has submitted its reply on. 05.07.2011.The Committee considered the reply of the institution Dt. 05.07.2011, VT report of the institution, VCD and other related documents along with the original file of the institution and decided that shifting to new/permanent premises be permitted for D.T.Ed (APS03798) course.

Further, the committee decided to permit the closure and withdraw of D.T.Ed-Al Course (APS07657) as per the request of the management vide letter Dt.27-07-2011, since the D.T.Ed-Al course is not functioning for last three years.

But, it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further admission subsequent to the date ofthis order.The affiliating body/examining board/body be informed accordingly. Further decided to return endowment funds and reseve fund deposited with regard to this course with SRC NCTE Bangalore, if any.

47. APSO1924D.Ed

Isthartha D.Ed College, Dhrwad.

KA

Isthartha D.Ed College, Shalmala Nagar, Kalaghatagi Road, Dharwad District-580002, Karnataka

Isthartha D.Ed College, Shalmala Nagar, Kalaghatagi Road, Dharwad District-580002, Karnataka has submitted application for D.Ed course on 31.12.2003. The institution has been granted recognition for D.Ed course with an intake of 50 students on 28.03.2007.

Based on the compliant of the State Government and recommendation vide Ref No. ED 183 PTI 2008 dated 13.08.2008 to withdraw the recognition accorded to the above institution. SRC in its 170th meeting held on 16-17 February 2009 decided to issue notice.

Mean while, the institution has approached the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in W.P. 62161 of 2009 and has obtained interim stay on the matter on 24.03.2009 and further extended on 21.04.2009. In view of the stay order, a notice could not be issued to the institution as the matter was considered sub-judice.

The SRC in its 177th meeting held on 22-23 June 2009, discussed the matter and decided to defer the matter and refer to the legal Counsel for advice on the complaint and recommendation to withdraw the recognition


88



granted to the institution by the State Government of Karnataka and the Writ petitions filed in the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka W.P. No. 62161 of 2009.

In the meantime, this office is in receipt of judgment dated 12.08.2009 has been disposed. The matter was placed before SRC in its 184 th meeting held on 26-27 October 2009 and decided to issue notice. Notice was issued to the institution on 03.12.2009. The institution submitted its written representation on 24.12.2009. The SRC in its 188th meeting held on 28-29 January 2010 considered the written representation and decided to call for clarification. Accordingly, clarification letter was issued to the institution on 04.03.2010 for the following points :

Building completion certificate issued from the Government authority in the prescribed format is not submitted

Filled- in – questionnaire has not been submitted by the institution.

The institution has submitted its clarification on 22.03.2010 stated as under:

“ We had already submitted written representation with essential relevant documents from the beginning from time to time for your consideration. The competent authority in collusion with local politicians for their personal gains. The complaint of State Government is false and erroneous. As such we have been constrained to approach the Hon’ble High Court in this regard. The above reference (2&3) writ petition and the same is pending consideration till to day.

Kindly note that Hon’ble Superme Court order 2006 AIR SCW 2048. 2006 Sl.No.75 is very clear NCTE under 1993 Act and after complying with the provisions of the Act permission was granted by NCTE “The State thereafter could not have interfered with the said decision”. It is also clear that Arcticle 21A would cover primary as well as secondary education and petitioners could claims benefit of Part III of the constitution as well.

Thus, the entire complaint of the State Government is without any basis and the same is liable to be rejected. Furhter, since the matter is sub-judice any decision taken in this regard would amount to contempt of court proceedings.

Under these circumstances, it is hereby requested to have done


89



with baiting in the interest of justice and direct the State Government authorities to grant all possible help to run the institution smoothly in the interest the SC/ST community to which the institution belongs”.

In the meantime, State Government vide its letter dated 11.08.2010 has requested SRC, NCTE to cancel the recognition granted to institution. SRC in its 197th meeting held on 13-14 October 2010 considered the relevant documentary evidences and decided to issue showcause notice. Showcause notice was issued to the institution on 06.12.2010 on the following reasons:

1. Rs.40000/- is not being submitted by the institution towards inspection fee for causing inspection till date.

2. The intitution is trying to avoid the inspection indefinitely, so that deficiencies of the institution (as complained by the State Government) could not be examined and no action could be taken on that grounds. This is considered to be rather deliberate.

The institution has submitted written representation on 05.01.2011 and stating as follow:

1. The institution has stated that the SRC had inspected after remittance of inspection fees of Rs.40,000/-. The inspection team has physically verified and found correct, the infrastructure facilities and reserve fund, staff building etc and given good opinion with written recommendation to continue the college recognition. Therefore matter connected above with remittance of inspection fee amount is not queastionnaire are proved as petitioner enquiry judgment order touching the showcause notice matter null and void as per judgment”. Rs.40,000/- towards inspection fee not submitted.

2. The institution has stated that “the entire complaint of State Government is without any basis and the same is liable to be rejected further. Since, the matter is subjudice any decision taken in this regard would amount to contempt of court proceedings”. The institution has requested to withdraw the notice in the interest of the justice and to direct the State Government authorities to grant al possible help to run the institution.

The SRC in its 200th meeting held on 20-21 January 2011 considered the written representation of the institution and decided to cause inspection.


90



The inspection was carried out on 03.04.2011

The SRC in its meeting held on 18-19 May 2011 considered the written representation of the institution and decided to issue Showcause Notice. Accordingly, showcause notice was issued to the institution on 27.06.2011. The institution submitted the written representation on 28.07.2011.

The Committee considered the reply of the institution, VT Report and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Final Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following:

1. The total Built up area earmarked for the D.Ed programme is only 10000 Sq. ft., which is grossly inadequate as per NCTE norms. The same is also corroborated by the management by affixing signature of the management representative in the essential data.

2. As per VT report and as seen from VCD, The building is incomplete and still under construction. The roof of the second floor of the building is covered with Asbestos sheets. Cellar flooring is not plastered. Play ground, library, labs of this institute is being shared with High school and a Primary school in the same building run by the management. This is not permissible as per NCTE norms.

3. The details of the earmarked land area, built up area for High School and Primary School, and for the Teacher Education Programme are to be given; as the management is running all the courses in the same Building/Premises.

4. Approved Building plan from competent Govt. authority is to be submitted.

5. The latest Building Completion Certificate from the competent Government Engineer is not submitted.

6. Land Usage Certificate from the concerned Government authorities stating that the land is exclusively permitted/ sanctioned for Educational Purposes is to be submitted.

7. Original FDRs for Rs. 5 lacs and 3 lacs towards Endowment and Reserve fund respectively from a Nationalised Bank in joint account is to be submitted.

8. Science lab & Education Technology lab needs to be strengthened /inadequate.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Final Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue


91



of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available, with no further notice.

48. APSO5887D.T.Ed

Parimala Teacher Training Institute, Thoothukudi.

TN

Parimala Teacher Training Institute, Thoothukudi District, TamilnaduParimala Teacher Training Institute, Thoothukudi District, Tamilnadu has submitted an application for seeking grant of recognition for D.T.Ed course on 02.01.2006.

The application was processed and recognition order was issued to the institution on 23.12.2006 at Parimala Teacher Training Institute, No.504, Main Road, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi-628502, Tamilnadu with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.

The institution vide its letter dated 30.11.2009 submitted Rs.40000/- for shifting of premises at No.2/115B, New Town, Inammaniyatchi Post, Kovilpatti Taluk, Tuticorin-628502, Tamilnadu.Accordingly, the shifting inspection of the institution was fixed between 7 th-12th March 2011. The same was intimated to the institution on 04.03.2011. Accordingly inspection of the institution was conducted on 10.03.2011.

The Committee in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April 2011 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice. Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on. 05.05.2011. The institution has submitted the in its reply on. 09.06.2011.

The Committee considered the reply of the institution Dt. 09.06.2011 VT report of the institution and all other related documents along with the original file of the institution and decided that shifting to new/permanent premises be permitted for D.T.Ed (APS05887) course.

49. APSO2330 / 2200

B.Ed / D.EdSri Parshwanath College of Education for Women and Sri Parshwanth Teacher Training Institute of Women, Davanagere.

KA

Sri.Parshwanath College of Education for Women and Sri. Parashwanth Teacher Training Institute of Women, Ajjhally, P.O.Channagiri, Davangere-577213, Karnataka

Sri.Parshwanath College of Education for Women and Sri. Parashwanth Teacher Training Institute of Women, Ajjhally, P.O.Channagiri, Davangere-577213, Karnataka granted recognition by SRC for offering B.Ed and D.Ed course with an intake of 100 and 50 students respectively. Recognition orders were issued on 09.12.2004 & 30.11.2004.

Further, this office is in receipt of letter dated 18.09.2009 from NCTE, Hqrs and has forwarded a complaint received from the students of B.Ed and D.Ed course of Parshwanth College of Education regarding harassment by the management.


92



The SRC in its 187th meeting held on 29-30 December 2009 considered the matter and decided to call for remarks from the college for further action. Accordingly, a letter seeking remarks on 25.02.2010. SRC in its 189th meeting held on 25-26 February 2010 considered the remarks and decided to cause inspection under section 17. Accordingly, inspection has been carried out on 11.06.2010. SRC in its 193rd meeting held on 21-22 June 2010 considered the VT report and decided to withdraw recognition. Accordingly, a withdrawal order was issued to the institution on 03.08.2010. The management is running D.Ed and B.Ed courses in the same building/ premises.

The institution approached the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in W.P.2113 of 2010 and passed judgement on 19.01.2011 which states as follows:

“The petitioner is permitted to file objection/ explanation within a period of 3 weeks and if so done, the respondent-NCTE is directed to consider the same and pass orders, in accordance with law.”

As per the court directions, the institution has submitted its written representation on 08.02.2011.

The SRC in its 201st meeting held on 22-23 February 2011 considered the reply of the institution, VT report and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to issue Final Show cause Notice. Accordingly, Final Showcause notice was issued to the institution on 25.03.2011. The institution submitted its written representation on 05.05.2011. The deficiencies are:

1. The total built-up-area earmarked for both B.Ed. & D.Ed. courses is only 9976 sq.ft against the requirement of total 32,000 sq.ft

2. Website address is not available.3. Library can accommodate only 10 students and has only 1500

books related to Education which is less than the required as per NCTE norms.

4. Equipment provided in the Science lab. is insufficient for two courses. The storage and display facilities are not available in the Science lab.

5. Equipment in ET lab. are inadequate6. Class rooms and lab. facilities are inadequate for organizing two

teacher education programmes(B.Ed. and D.Ed.)7. The staff appointed for teaching B.Ed. methodology are not

qualified as per NCTE norms.

The 201st meeting held on 22-23 February 2011 considered the VT Report,


93



VCD, reply of the institution dt. 05.05.2011 for APS02330-B.Ed & APS02200-D.Ed courses and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve another Final Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following:

The specific points in the Final show cause notice dt. 25.03.2011 remain unanswered even now.

The SRC in its 205th meeting held on 18-19 May 2011 considered the written representation and decided to issue another Final showcause notice. Accordingly, Final showcause notice was issued to the institution on 27.06.2011. The institution submitted its written representation on 27.07.2011. The institution has not submitted pointwise reply. The extract of the reply is given below:

In view of the incontrovertible fact which is well within your ken that notice after notice is being insuccinctly issued and also the further equally incontrovertible fact that not only everyone of the said notices has been duly replied to by us and, on the well-founded grounds which have been raised in the Memorandum of Writ Petition in W.P. Nos. 16680-82/2011 (ed) they have even questioned the propriety, bonafides, legality and authority of the “Final Showcause Notice” cited at reference No. (ii) supra, and also the fact that notwithstanding such a petition have been heard by the Hon’ble High Court and notice thereof ordered to you and to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi on 3.05.2011 we have even submitted the written representation on05.05.2011 which fact is also notice by you in the 18th and 19th may 2011 on Subject No.134, they have constrained to state that there is no useful purpose which might be served by our repeating and reiterating the firm stand which has already been taken by us in the replies which have hither to been submitted by us response to the repeated notice that have been already issued to us. Therefore, they hereby state that what has already been exhaustively stated in the earlier replies would hold good as reply to the notice cited at reference No. (I) as well. However what is additionally to be stated and is “Final Showcase Notice” notice dated 27.06.2011 has made an unjust inroad into and interference with the pendency to which has been well within your Knowledge. Therefore, without any kind of prejudice to our Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India, bringing to the notice of the said court the chronology of events which have succeeded at your end during the pendency of the aforementioned writ petitions and requesting the Hon’ble High Court to initiate appropriate action under the said provision, suomotto we state that any further adverse action if any that might be resorted to against us under or in pursuance of the “Final Showcase Notice” under reference would be virtually to be a perpetuation of the gross criminal contempt of the Hon’ble High Court advisedly, they , therefore, refrain from commenting on the


94



merits and contents of this reply, stating further that there is neither justification nor warrant nor even any basis for proceeding against us as has been threatened in the notice under reference.

Since the matter is directly and substantially in issue before the Hon’ble High Court, any precipitating adverse action against us they therefore, refrain from commenting on the merits and contents of the Final Show cause Notice dated 27.06.2011 in this reply, stating further that there is neither justification nor warrant nor even any basis for proceeding against us as has been threatened in the notice under reference.

Since the matter is directly and substantially in issue before the Hon’ble High Court, any precipitating adverse action against us would be a further into the high seized of the matter, in the aforementioned petitions.

The committee has taken note of the reply of the institution Dt. 27.07.2011 to the final show cause notice issued to the institution and considered the VT report and other relevant documents and in view of the specific deficiencies pointed out in the final show cause notice are found to be substantive and still remaining unrefuted/unanswered, it was decided that the recognition of the institution be withdrawn, on the following grounds:

The total built-up-area earmarked for both B.Ed. & D.Ed. courses is only 9976 sq.ft against the requirement of total 32,000 sq.ft

Website address is not available. Library can accommodate only 10 students and has only 1500

books related to Education which is less than the required as per NCTE norms.

Equipment provided in the Science lab. is insufficient for two courses. The storage and display facilities are not available in the Science lab.

Equipment in ET lab. are inadequate Class rooms and lab. facilities are inadequate for organizing

two teacher education programmes(B.Ed. and D.Ed.) The staff appointed for teaching B.Ed. methodology are not

qualified as per NCTE norms.

However, legal opinion be obtained on the alleged criminial contempt of Court, as being threatened by the institution.

50. APSO1490 / 1830 / 9350

D.Ed. / B.Ed. / M.Ed

National D.Ed Institute, Hafth Gumbad, Gulbarga-585104, Karnataka

National D.Ed Institute, Hafth Gumbad, Gulbarga-585104, Karnataka has submitted application for D.Ed course on 09.12.2003. The institution has


95



National B.Ed. Institute, Gulbarga.

KA

been granted recognition for D.Ed course with an intake of 50 students on 17.06.2005.

A letter No.ED 122 PTI 2008 (BO dated 18.06.2009 was received from the Principal Secretary, Primary and Higher Education, Education Department, Government of Karnataka and has recommended SRC to withdraw the recognition granted to D.Ed course, as the institution is not mentioned Norms and Standards as prescribed by NCTE.

The matter was placed before SRC in its 178th meeting held on 13-14 July 2009. The committee decided to issue notice and notice was issued to the institution on 12.08.2009. The institution submitted its written representation on 09.09.2009 & 14.09.2009. The SRC in its 183rd meeting held on 22nd September 2009 considered the written representation and decided to conduct inspection.

A notice was issued to the institution on 31.10.2009. The institution has submitted its written representation on 24.11.2009 & 07.01.2010. The SRC in its 189th meeting held on 25-26 February 2010 considered the written representation and decided to cause inspection. Accordingly, inspection was carried out on 04.06.2010. Then SRC in 193rd meeting held on 21-22 June 2010 considered the VT report and decided to withdraw recognition for D.Ed course. Accordingly, withdrawal order was issued to the institution on 02.08.2010.

Further, institution preferred appeal to NCTE, Hqrs and the appellate authority vide order dated 27.09.2010 has reversed the withdrawal order of SRC with direction to SRC to issue showcasuse notice to the institution.

The SRC in its 197th meeting held on 13-14 October 2010 considered the Appellate Authority order and decided to issue showcause notice. Accordingly, showcause notice was issued to the institution on 07.12.2010.

Further, the institution has submitted written representation on 04.01.2011. The SRC in its 200th meeting held on 20-21 January 2011 considered the written representation of the institution and decided to cause Composite inspection. The institution is also running B.Ed and M.Ed courses. The inspection was carried out on 02.04.2011. The inspection report has been received along with VCD.

The SRC in its 204th meeting held on 27th – 28th April, 2011 considered the VT report, VCD and the relevant documentary evidences decided to issue Showcause notice. Accordingly, Showcause notice was issued to the institution on 01.06.2011. The institution has submitted its written representation on 02.06.2011 seeing Showcause notice appeared on


96



website.

The SRC in its 206th meeting held on 9-10 of June,2011, considered written written representation and decided to issue Final Show Cause Notice. Final Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 07.07.2011. The institution has submitted the written representation on 21.07.2011 for all the three courses i.e., D.Ed, B.Ed and M.Ed.

The committee considered the reply of the institution Dt. 21.07.2011 and decided to restore recognition of the institution.

51. APSO1955D.Ed.

Nagashree Diploma in Education Institution, Hassan.

KA

Nagashree Diploma in Education Institution, Mysore Road, Channarayapatna, Hassan District-573113, KarnatakaNagashree Diploma in Education Institution, Mysore Road, Channarayapatna, Hassan District-573113, Karnataka has submitted application on 30.12.2003. The institution was granted recognition for offering D.Ed course with an intake of 50 students vide order dated 01.12.2004.

The institution was granted recognition with a condition that the institution shall shift to its own premises/building within three years from the date of recognition. (In case the course started in rented premises). The institution has submitted land documents in the form of Grant certificate from Tahsildar Channarayapatna, Hassan for S.No.60 with 4 acres 6 guntas in the name of Hemavathi Education Trust. Approval Building Plan is also for the same S.No.60 at the time of initial application. They were required toshift to own building in this land.

The institution submitted proposal for shifting of premises on 03.12.2007 along with Rs.40,000/- vide Receipt No.13729 dated 21.01.2008 towards inspection fee for shifting of premises.

Inspection team visited to the institution on 07.04.2011. A letter dated 12.04.2011 has been received from the VT members stating that the institution is functioning in the same old building on lease, where the first recognition has been granted by SRC, NCTE, Bangalore. The institution has not shifted to its own premises for which the visit has been arranged. The Principal of the College has given a letter also stating that they have never given a letter to SRC, NCTE, Bangalore that they are shifting to their own building. The letter dt.07.04.2011 from the Principal is enclosed.

The institution had vide its letter dt.20.09.2007 informed that it has permanent land of 6 acres. But due to some complications, it could not shift to new permanent building. It requested for permission to run in the same temporary building and it made 30 years agreement (in regional language), photocopy therefore is placed in file dt.17.09.2007. No approval is given by SRC for this proposed to continue on rent.


97



The SRC in its 205th meeting held on 18-19 May 2011 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, Showcause notice was issued to the institution on 15.06.2011. The institution submitted the written representation on 21.07.2011.

The Committee considered the written reply of the institution dt. 21.07.2011 on the above matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for the following reasons:-

As per the VT report, the management has not shifted to new building, as per the norms that shifting to be done to new premises within 3 years of issue of recognition of the institution. At the time of the visit of the VT members to the institution for inspection, the principal had given a letter stating that they had never given a letter to SRC for shifting from old building to new building. The institution is still functioning in the old building. The Institution was granted recognition in temporary premises to run B.Ed course on 1.12.2004 with a condition that it should shift to its own permanent premises in 3 years. i.e., on or before 30.11.2007. The Institution is still running in temporary premises and not shifted to new premises even after a lapse of stipulated 3 years and after lapse of time period of more than 6 years and 08 months.

As per VCD observation, the building is roofed with asbestos sheets and as admitted by the institution in its reply.

The latest Building Completion Certificate from the competent Government Engineer is not submitted.

Non- Encumbrance Certificate from the competent Government Authorised person / Authority is to be submitted.

The Affidavit on Rs. 100/- stamp paper in the prescribed format with notary attestation is not submitted.

Fixed deposits in joint name towards Endowment fund & Reserve fund from a Nationalised Bank is not for a period of 5 years and it is only for a period of 300 days.

The institute has not submitted the approved Building plan from a competent Govt. authority.

The Management/ Principal has not co-operated with the VT team for conduct of Inspection under section 17 of the NCTE act, which is a gross violation of NCTE regulations.

There is no evidence of construction of the building.

Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the recognition of the D.Ed course run by the Nagashree Diploma in Education Institution, Mysore Road, Channarayapatna, Hassan


98



District-573113, Karnataka, from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.

But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.

The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.

Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited with SRC NCTE, Bangalore.

52. APSO1865B.Ed.

Acharya College of Education, Bangalore.

KA

Acharya College of Education, 89 & 90, Soladevana Halli, Hesaraghatta Main Road, Chikkabanavara Post, Bangalore-560090, Karnataka

Acharya College of Education, 89 & 90, Soladevana Halli, Hesaraghatta Main Road, Chikkabanavara Post, Bangalore-560090, Karnataka submitted application for grant of recognition to B.Ed course on 31.12.2003. The institution was granted recognition for offering B.Ed course of 100 students vide order dated 30.11.2004 with a condition to shift to its own premises/building within 3 years from the date of recognition.

The institution in its letter dated 05.10.2007 has submitted a proposal for shifting of premises along with Rs.40,000/- towards shifting fee. The inspection was carried out on 25.11.2010.

The SRC in 199th meeting held on 22-23 December 2010 considered the VT report and VCD and all the relevant documentary and decided to issue Showcause Notice. Accordingly, Showcause Notice was issued to the institution on 02.02.2011. The institution has submitted its written representation on 08.03.2011.

The SRC in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April 2011 considered the written representation and decided to cause Re- Inspection under Section 17 of NCTE Act.The re-inspection was carried out on 23.04.2011. The inspection report has been received along with VCD.

The SRC in its 205th meeting held on 18th-19th May 2011 considered written representation of the institution and decided to issue showcause notice. Accordingly, Showcause notice was issued to the institution on 15.06.2011. The institution has submitted written representation on 15.07.2011.

The Committee considered the reply of the institution, VT Report and


99



all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Final Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following:

The latest Building Completion Certificate from the competent Government Engineer is not submitted.

Land Usage Certificate from the concerned Government authorities stating that the land is exclusively permitted/ sanctioned for Educational Purposes is to be submitted

Non-Encumbrance certificate from the competent authority is not submitted.

Original FDRs for Rs. 5 lacs and 3 lacs towards Endowment and Reserve fund respectively from a Nationalised Bank in joint account is to be submitted.

Language learning lab is not available.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Final Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available, with no further notice.

53. APSO2409B.Ed.

Sri Sadashiva B.Ed Colleg, Bagalkot

KA

Sri Sadashiva B.Ed College, Lokapur Road, Basavanagara, Mudhol Taluk, Bagalkot District-587313, Karnataka.

Sri Sadashiva B.Ed College, Lokapur Road, Basavanagara, Mudhol Taluk, Bagalkot District, Pin – 587313, Karnataka has submitted application for offering B.Ed course on 31.12.2003. The institution was granted recognition for offering B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students vide order dated 03.02.2006 with a condition to shift to its own premises/building with 3 years from the date of recognition.

The institution in its letter dated 01.10.2009 has submitted a proposal for shifting of premises along with Rs.40,000/- towards shifting fee. Accordingly, inspection was carried out on 17.10.2010

The SRC in its 198th meeting held on 24-26 November 2010 considered the VT report and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to issue showcause notice. Accordingly, showcause notice was issued to the institution on 11.01.2011. The institution has submitted its written representation on 11.02.2011.

The SRC in its 201st meeting held on 22-23 February 2011 considered the written representation, VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary


100



evidences and decided to issue Final Showcause notice. Accordingly, Final Showcause notice was issued to the institution on 25.03.2011. The institution has submitted its written representation on 28.04.201

The SRC in its 205th meeting held on 18-19 May 2011 considered the written representation and decided to serve another Final Show cause Notice. Accordingly, another final showcause notice was issued to the institution 15.06.2011. The institution submitted the written representation on 20.07.2011.

The Committee considered the written reply of the institution Dt. 21.07.2011 on the above matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for the following reasons:-

Land documents in the name of the Society/Trust/Institution is not submitted. The institution has submitted only an affidavit instead of sale deed/registered gift geed.

Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the recognition of the B.Ed course run by the Sri Sadashiva B.Ed College, Lokapur Road, Basavanagara, Mudhol Taluk, Bagalkot District-587313, Karnataka, from the academic year 2012.13, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in B.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.




54. APSO2328B.Ed.

Rajeev College of Education, Hassan.

KA

Rajeev College of Education, Lalitha Krupa Building, B.M.Road, Hassan-573201, Karnataka

Rajeev College of Education, Lalitha Krupa Building, B.M.Road, Hassan-573201, Karnataka has submitted application on 31.12.2003. The institution was granted recognition for offering B.Ed course from the session 2004-2005 with an intake of 100 students vide order dated 29.11.2004.

The institution was granted recognition with a condition that the institution shall shift to its own premises/building within three years from the date of recognition. (In case the course started in rented premises)


101




The inspection was carried out on 05.04.2011. The inspection report has been received along with VCD.


The Committee considered the reply of the institution, VT Report and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Final Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following: A Certificate from the Government Affiliating University/body to the

effect that no other programme is being run/shared by the institution in the same building / Campus, along with the B.Ed is to be submitted.

Earmarked area for the each of the course being run by the institution is to be submitted and also for use of remaining 2nd, 3rd & 4th floor of the building.


55. APSO1437 / APSO6119D.Ed. / D.Ed-AISrinivasa Vidya Nikethan D.Ed. College, Bangalore Rural.KA

Srinivasa Vidya Nikethan D.Ed College, Arasina Kunte, Nelamangala Taluk, Bangalore Rural District-562123, Karnataka

Srinivasa Vidya Nikethan D.Ed College, Arasina Kunte, Nelamangala Taluk, Bangalore Rural District-562123, Karnataka has submitted application for D.Ed course on 27.11.2003 and for D.Ed-AI course on 30.12.2005. The institution has been granted recognition for D.Ed course on 23.12.2004 with an intake of 50 students. Further, the institution was granted recognition for D.Ed–AI course on 16.05.2007 with an existing intake of 50 students and additional intake of 50 students thus with an annual intake of 100 students with the condition to shift into own premises


102



within 3 years of recognition order.

NCTE, Hqrs vide its letter dated 22.09.2010 has forwarded a copy of the inspection report dated 21.04.2010 conducted Under Section 13 of NCTE Act. As there are deficiencies pointed out in the inspection report, NCTE, Hqrs has requested SRC to initiate action against the institution Under Section 17 of the NCTE Act immediately.

The SRC in its 197th meeting held on 13-14 October, 2010 considered the matter and decided to issue Showcause Notice. Accordingly, showcause notice was issued to the institution on 06.12.2010. The institution has submitted written representation on 09.12.2010.

The SRC in its 200th meeting held on 20-21 January 2011 considered written representation of the institution and decided to issue showcause notice. Accordingly, Showcause notice was issued to the institution on 11.03.2011. The institution has submitted written representation on 31.03.2011.

The SRC in its 204th meeting held on 27th-28th April 2011 considered written representation of the institution and decided to issue Final Showcause notice. Accordingly, Final Showcause notice was issued to the institution on 02.06.2011. The institution has submitted written representation on 15.07.2011.

The matter was considered by the Committee and it was decided to cause inspection for shifting of the institution for D.Ed. (APS01437) Course & D.Ed-Al Course (APS06119) under Section 17 of NCTE Act, to verify the facts and directed to submit all relevant documents including Rs. 40000/- towards shifting fee.

56. APSO1632D.Ed.Sree Yatheendra D.Ed. College, Hassan.KA

Sree Yatheendra D.Ed College, P&T Colony, Hassan District-573201, Karnataka

Sree Yatheendra D.Ed College, P&T Colony, Hassan District-573201, Karnataka has submitted application on 29.12.2003. The institution was granted recognition for offering D.Ed course from the session 2004-2005 with an intake of 50 students vide order dated 02.12.2004.




103




The inspection was carried out on 6-04-2011.


At the time of making application, the institution has provided lease deed of 38 months, at P&T colony, Hassan. The institution was required to shift to own permanent premises within 3 years. Instead, the institution has chosen to shift to new premises on private lease for 30 years, which is not admissible. The date of the lease deed is subsequent to recognition order/ this is not permissible as per NCTE norms.

The total built up area earmarked for the D.Ed programme is only 6837 sq.ft. Which is grossly inadequate for the teacher education programme as per NCTE norms. The same is also corroborated by the management by affixing signature of the management representative in the essential data and admitted in its reply that the institution has only 6837 sq.ft of Built up area.

The Management has shifted to new premises on a private lease deed for 30 years, as per regulations of NCTE the lease deed should be for Govt. land or own land and building.

As seen from VCD, a School is also being run in the same building.

In the building plan submitted, the built up area is not mentioned & not approved by the competent authority.

Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the recognition of the D.Ed course run by the Sree Yatheendra D.Ed College P & T Clony, Hassan District-573201, Karnataka, from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.




104




57. APSO1410D.EdGoutham Teacher Training Institute, Gundulpet.KA

Goutham Teacher Training Institute, Gundlupet-571111, Chamarajanagar District, Karnataka

Goutham Teacher Training Institute, Gundlupet-571111, Chamarajanagar District, Karnataka submitted an application for grant of recognition on 30.09.2003. The institution was granted recognition for offering D.Ed course with an intake of 50 students vide order dated 29.11.2004 with the condition to shift to its own premises within 3 years from the date of recognition.

NCTE, Hqrs vide its letter dated 25.04.2011 has forwarded a copy of the inspection report dated 24.06.2010 conducted Under Section 13 of NCTE Act. As there are deficiencies pointed out in the inspection report, NCTE, Hqrs has requested SRC to look into the matter in order to ascertain the compliance/ adherence of the NCTE Norms and Standards by the institution and also to take appropriate action.



As per VT report, the institution is functioning in an old temporary building, which was originally, meant for Hostel. The construction of new building is yet to start; the management has shown to the VT members the proposed land where the new building is proposed to be constructed; only fencing is put around the boundary of the land where work is yet to start. This is gross negligence on the part of the management that even after a lapse of 3 years (and after more than of 6 years and 9 months) that shifting has not been effected. The construction of new building has not started. (The management has also admitted the same). This is against the NCTE norms.

Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the recognition of the D.Ed course run by the Goutham Teacher Training Institute, Gundlupet-571111, Chamarajanagar District, Karnataka,


105



from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.




58. APSO1547D.Ed.Sri Sivalingeshwara Vidya Peeta D.Ed College, Haveri.KA

Sri Sivalingeshwara Vidya Peeta D.Ed College, Hukkerimath, Haveri-581110, Karnataka.Sri Sivalingeshwara Vidya Peeta D.Ed College, Hukkerimath, haveri-581110, Karnataka has submitted application for offering D.Ed course on 23.12.2003. The institution has been granted recognition by SRC for offering D.Ed course with an intake of 50 students vide order dated 30.11.2004. with the condition to shift into own premises within 3 years of recognition order.The Institution submitted proposal for shifting of premises on 24.09.2007 along with Rs.40,000/- vide Receipt No.13337 dated 25.10.2007 towards inspection fee for shifting of premises.

The shifting inspection was conducted on 30.3.2011 and the VT report was considered in the SRC in its 205th meeting held on 18th-19th May 2011 considered written representation of the institution and decided to issue showcause notice. Accordingly, Showcause notice was issued to the institution on 15.06.2011. The institution has submitted written representation on 14.07.2011.

The Committee considered the reply of the institution Dt. 17.07.2011 VT report of the institution and all other related documents along with the original file of the institution and it was decided that shifting to new/permanent premises be permitted for D.T.Ed (APS01547) course.

59. APSO1647D.Ed –AISri. Bhavani D.Ed. College, Kolar.KA

Sri.Bhavani D.Ed College, Bethamangala-563116, Bangarpet Taluk, Kolar District, Karnataka

Sri.Bhavani D.Ed College, Bethamangala – 563116, Bangarpet Taluk, Kolar District, Karnataka was granted recognition for offering D.Ed-AI course on 27.12.2004 with an intake of 200 students which includes existing intake of 120 students and additional intake of 80 students.

NCTE, Hqrs vide its letter dated 10.08.2010 has forwarded a copy of the


106



inspection report dated 15.06.2010 conducted under section 13 of NCTE Act. As there are deficiencies pointed out in the inspection report, NCTE, Hqrs has requested SRC to initiate action against the institution under section 17 of the NCTE Act immediately.

The SRC in its 195th meeting held on 17-18 August 2010 considered the report and decided to issue show cause Notice. Accordingly, Notice was issued to the institution on 22.09.2010. The institution has submitted written representation on 18.10.2010.

The SRC in its 198th meeting held on 24-26 November 2010 considered the written representation and decided to cause inspection under Section 17 of NCTE Act. The management is also running 3 units of D.Ed-Al with an intake of 200 in the same building/premises. The inspection was carried out on 04.04.2011.

The SRC in its 205th meeting held on 18-19 May 2011 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and decided to issue Showcause Notice. Accordingly, showcause notice was issued to the institution on 27.06.2011. The institution submitted the written representation on 25.07.2011.The Committee considered the reply of the institution Dt. 25.07.2011, VT report of the institution and all other related documents along with the original file of the institution and it was decided to continue recognition accorded to the institution.

60. APSO1531D.EdVivekananda Teacher Training Institute, Puttur.KA

Vivekananda Teacher Training Institute, Vivekanagar, Thenkila, Puttur-574201, Dakshina Kannada District, Karnataka

Vivekananda Teacher Training Institute, Vivekanagar, Thenkila, Puttur-574201, Dakshin Kannada District, Karnataka has submitted application for offering D.Ed course on 19.12.2003. The institution has been granted recognition by SRC for offering D.Ed course with an intake of 50 students vide order dated 30.11.2004.

The institution in its letter dated 18.09.2007 has submitted a proposal for shifting of premises along with Rs.40,000/- towards shifting fee. The inspection was carried out on 27th December 2010. The inspection report has been received along with VCD.

The SRC in its 200th meeting held on 200th meeting held on 20-21 January 2011 considered the VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to issue Show cause notice. Accordingly, Show cause notice was issued to the institution on 11.03.2011. The institution submitted its written representation on 11.04.2011.

The SRC in its 205th meeting held on 18-19 May 2011 considered the


107



written representation and decided to issue Final showcause notice. Accordingly, Final Show cause Notice was issued on 27.06.2011. The institution has submitted written representation on 21.07.2011 and 27.07.2011.

The Committee considered the written reply of the institution Dt. 21.07.2011 & 27.07.2011 on the above matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for the following reasons:-

On the other side of the building, the name of the other college is mentioned as Vivekananda Law College. This is a clear indication that the management is running Law College in the new building.

The built up area earmarked for the D.Ed and B.Ed courses respectively are 7319 and 3332 sq.ft. which are inadequate as per the NCTE norms. As per the NCTE norms the total built up are required for both B.Ed and D.Ed courses is 32000 sq.ft.

In the building plan the survey number and built up area is not mentioned. As it is required to determine the location of the land.

The location Sy.nos of the building where the inspection is done by VT members is not clear for new premises

Building plan from competent Govt. authority is to be submitted.

Building completion certificate from competent Govt. Engineer is to be submitted

A certificate from the Government affiliating body to the effect that no other programme is being run/shared by the institution in the same building/campus, along with the existing course D.Ed & B.Ed is not submitted.

Original Land documents with survey Nos of the land where the institution is to be shifted is not submitted

Psychology lab, Science lab & Education Technology lab needs to be strengthened.

Language learning lab is not available.

Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the recognition of the D.Ed course (APS01531) run by the Vivekananda Teacher Training Institute, Vivekanagar, Thenkila, Puttur-574201, Dakshina Kannada District, Karnataka, from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.

But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any


108



further admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.


Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited with SRC NCTE, Bangalore of D.Ed course & serve show cause notice for B.Ed course also on the above points why recognition can’t be withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available, with no further notice.

61. APSO0352C.P.EdMalnad College of Physical Education, Teerthahalli, ShimogaKA

Malnad College of Physical Education, Teerthahalli-577432, Shimoga District, Karnataka

Malnad College of Physical Education, Teerthahalli-577432, Shimoga District, Karnataka has been granted recognition for C.P.Ed Course on 15.07.1998.

A letter dated 18.11.2010 has been received from the Government of Karnataka and had stated that based on the report of the Director, DSERT, the Government had recommended that the recognition of Malnad College of Physical Education be withdrawn immediately.

The SRC in its 198th meeting held on 24-26 November 2010 considered the letter dt.18.11.2010 received from the State Government pertaining to the institution and decided to cause inspection. The inspection was carried out on 27.06.2011.

The 205th meeting held on 18-19 May 2011 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and decided to issue Show cause Notice. Accordingly, showcause notice was issued to the institution on 27.06.2011. The institution submitted the written representation on 25.07.2011.


As per the VT report, the built up area is only 500 Sq.ft., which is grossly inadequate as per NCTE norms. This fact is admitted by the management and the land is also under


109



dispute. As per VT/VCD, the institute is still running in a rented

premises in the new premises. The construction of new building is not started.

Affidavit of Rs.100/- in prescribed format is to be submitted. The latest Building Completion Certificate from the competent

Government Engineer is not submitted. Land Usage Certificate from the concerned Government

authorities stating that the land is exclusively permitted/ sanctioned for Educational Purposes is to be submitted.

Non-Encumbrance certificate from the competent authority is not submitted

Instructional facilities are not available in the institution as admitted by the management in its reply due to demolition of the building by the unscrupulous persons.

In the rented building where the institution is functioning, an Anganvadi programme is also being run in the first floor of the building as admitted by the management.

Library facilities are not available & institution has admitted that it has only 1200 books.

No playground facilities are provided and it is admitted by the institution.

Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the recognition of the C.P.Ed course (APS00352) run by theMalanad College of Physical Education, Teerthahalli-577432, Shimoga District, Karnataka, from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.




62. APSO2069B.Ed.Sri. Krishna College of Education, Bangalore.KA

Sri.Krishna College of Education, Karnataka Yadava Educational Society, No.12/2, Yamuna Bai Road, Madhava Nagar, Bangalore-560001,Karnataka

Sri.Krishna College of Education, Karnataka Yadava Educational Society, No.12/2, Yamuna Bai Road, Madhava Nagar, Bangalore-560001,Karnataka


110



Sri. Krishna College of Education, Karnataka Yadava Educational Society, No.12/2, Yamuna Bai Road, Madhava Nagar, Bangalore-560001, Karnataka has submitted application for starting B.Ed course on 31.12.2003. The institution was granted recognition on 25.11.2004 with an intake of 100 students.

As per the decision of 175th meeting of SRC held on 13-14 May 2009, the institutions where recognition’s were granted in temporary premises with a condition shift to permanent premises within period of three years time limit of grant recognition as per NCTE Regulations, 2002 notified in 18.11.2002, were considered. It was decided that institutions which have not shifted to the permanent premises even after the expiry of three years time limit be issued notice under section 17 of NCTE Act for further action.

Accordingly, Notice was issued to the institution on 01.09.2009. The institution has submitted its written representation on 30.09.2009. SRC in its 187th meeting held on 29-30 December 2009 considered the written representation and decided to cause inspection. Accordingly inspection was carried out on 04.06.2010.The SRC in its 193rd meeting held on 21-22 June 2010 considered the VT report and other documents and decided to withdraw the recognition. Accordingly withdrawal order was issued to the on 28.07.2010.

The committee has decided to await for the reply from the institution for the certificate from affiliating body/Technical Department/ITI authority.

63. APSO0027 / APSO3115D.Ed / D.Ed-AIAnnai Fathima Teacher Training Institute, KolarKA

Annai Fathima Teacher Training Institute, Hirebidanur, Gauribidanur Taluk, Kolar District-561208, Karrnataka

Annai Fathima Teacher Training Institute, Hirebidanur, Gauribidanur Taluk, Kolar District-561208, Karnataka has submitted application for D.Ed course on 27.01.2004. The institution has been granted recognition for D.Ed-AI on 13.12.2004 with an intake of 50 students which includes existing intake of 30 students and additional intake of 20 students with the condition to shift to its own premises within 3 years from the date of recognition.

NCTE, Hqrs vide its letter dated 10.08.2010 has forwarded a copy of the inspection report dated 16.06.2010 conducted under section 13 of NCTE Act. As there are deficiencies pointed out in the inspection report, NCTE, Hqrs has requested SRC to initiate action against the institution under section 17 of the NCTE Act immediately.

The SRC in its 195th meeting held on 17-18 August 2010, considered the report of the institution and decided to issue Showcause Notice.


111



Accordingly, showcause notice was issued to the institution on 27.09.2010. The institution submitted its written representation on 25.10.2010. The SRC in its 198th meeting held on 24-26 November 2010 considered the written representation of the institution and decided to cause inspection under section 17 of NCTE Act.

The inspection was carried out on 06th April, 2011. The SRC in its 204th

meeting held on 27th–28th April 2011 considered the VT report and the decided to issue Showcause notice. Accordingly, Showcause notice was issued to the institution on 02.06.2011. The institution has submitted its written representation on 11.07.2011.


The total Built up area earmarked for the D.Ed (APS00027) & D.Ed–Al (APS03115) is only 4512.6 Sq.ft. which is grossly inadequate for the Teacher Education Programme being run as per NCTE norms. The same is also corroborated by the management by affixing signature of the management representative in the essential data.

In the Building plan the built up area, and Sy,nos are not mentioned.

Notarized copy of Land usage certificate issued by competent authority is not submitted.

Non- Encumbrance Certificate from the competent Government Authorized person / Authorities not submitted.

Science lab, Psychology lab & Educational Technology lab needs to be strengthened.

Physical Education lab & Language learning lab not available.

Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the recognition of both the courses,i.e., D.Ed course (APS00027) & D.Ed-Al (APS03115) run by the Annai Fathima Teacher Training Institute, Hirebidanur Gouribidanur Taluk, Kolar District-561208, Karnataka, from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.

But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly. Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited with SRC NCTE, Bangalore.


112



64. APSO2114D.EdKLS Teacher Training Institute, Bangalore.KA

KLS Teacher Training Institute, No.2, Manjunatha Complex, Koppanna Agrahara, Hosur Road, Bangalore-560010, Karnataka

KLS Teacher Training Institute, No.2, Manjunatha Complex, Koppanna Agrahara, Hosur Road, Bangalore-560010, Karnataka was granted recognition for offering D.Ed course of 50 students vide order dated 30.11.2004.

The institution was issued with a letter seeking documents for shifting of premises on 25.05.2009. The institution submitted its reply on 17.06.2009 and the same has been included in the list of institutions where inspections have to be carried out for shifting of premises. The institution has submitted a letter on 29.01.2010 and has requested this office to sanction No Objection permission for making correspondence in the new premises address.

Further, the institution submitted fee for causing inspection on 06.02.2009. It has not been possible to conduct the inspection due to administrative reasons. Now, the institution requested to issue permission to use proposed address of the institution for various communications with different departments. The SRC in its 190th meeting held on 29-30 March 2010 considered the reply of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition. Accordingly, recognition was withdrawn on 07.05.2010.

The institution preferred appeal against the withdrawal order to NCTE, Hqrs. The Appellate Authority has reversed the withdrawal order of SRC vide order dated 27.09.2010 with a direction of SRC to cause of Inspection of the institutions new premises. Accordingly, inspection was carried out to the institution on 12.11.2010.


Land Usage Certificate from the concerned Government authorities stating that the land is exclusively permitted/ sanctioned for Educational Purposes is to be submitted.

In building plan total built up area is 16218 sq.ft and site area/land area is not given.

The built up area mentioned in BCC and in essential data sheet of VT report are different, not matching, This discrepancy may be explained. The institution has tampered the data in the building completion certificate; this is act of misconduct on the part of the management and against the NCTE regulations.


113




65. APSO1558D.EdRSV College of Education (Sri Swamy Vivekananda D.Ed. College) Ranebennur,Haveri.KA

RSV College of Education (Sri Swamy Vivekananda D.Ed College), C/o.Ranebennur Taluka Education Society, Ranebennur-581115, Haveri District, KarnatakaRSV College of Education (Sri Swamy Vivekananda D.Ed College),C/o.Ranebennur Taluka Education Society, Ranebennur-581115, Haveri District, Karnataka has submitted application on 24.12.2003. The institution was granted recognition for offering D.Ed course with an intake of 50 students vide order dated 23.12.2004.


The institution submitted proposal for shifting of premises on 18.10.2007 along with Rs.40,000/- vide Receipt No. 13380 dated 25.10.2007 towards inspection fee for shifting of premises.

The SRC in its 205th meeting held on 18th-19th May 2011 considered written representation of the institution and decided to issue showcause notice. Accordingly, Showcause notice was issued to the institution on 15.06.2011. The institution has submitted written representation on 14.07.2011 and 29.07.2011.


As per the records submitted by the management, the land is on a private lease deed for 30 years in the name of Miranda Education Society executed on 02.08.2004. The institution was required to shift to its own premises and hence private lease not acceptable and against the norms of NCTE.

Non-Encumbrance certificate from the competent Government Authorized person/Authorities to be submitted.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Final Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to


114



make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available, with no further notice.

66. APSO3079Pr-PrimaryMithra Foundation Pre-Primary Teacher Training Institute, Bangalore.KA

Mithra Foundation Pre- Primary Teacher Training Institute, 290/7, Venkataramaiah Layout, R.M.Nagar Road, 2nd Cross, Bansawadi, Bangalore-560043, Karnataka

Mithra Foundation Pre- Primary Teacher Training Institute, 290/7, Venkataramaiah Layout, R.M.Nagar Road, 2nd Cross, Bansawadi, Bangalore-560043, Karnataka has submitted application on 31.01.2004. The institution was granted recognition for offering Pre-primary course from the session 2004-2005 with an intake of 30 students vide order dated 09.12.2004 with the condition to shift to its own premises within 3 years from date of recognition.

The institution submitted proposal for shifting of premises on 01.10.2007 along with Rs.40,000/- vide Receipt No. 13329 dated 25.10.2007 towards inspection fee for shifting of premises. The institution in its letter dated

The SRC in its 205th meeting held on 18th–19th May 2011 considered the decided to issue Showcause notice. Accordingly, Showcause notice was issued to the institution on 15.06.2011. The institution has submitted its written representation on 11.07.2011.

The Committee considered the reply of the institution Dt. 11.07.2011, VT report of the institution and other related documents along with the original file of the institution and decided to continue recognition accorded to the institution.

67. APSO3745B.Ed.Siddartha College of Education, Bagalkot.KA

Siddartha College of Education, Kale Complex, Bus stand Road, Jamkhandi, Bagalkot District, Karnataka

Siddartha College of Education, Kale Complex, Bus stand Road, Jamkhandi, Bagalkot District, Karnataka has submitted application on 30.12.2004. The institution was granted recognition for offering B.Ed course with an intake of 50 students vide order dated 26.12.2005. with the condition to shift to its own premises within 3 years from date of recognition.

The Institution submitted proposal for shifting of premises on 26.06.2011 along with Rs.40,000/- vide Receipt No.363392 dated 27.06.2011 towards inspection fee for shifting of Premises.

The SRC in its 204th meeting held on 27th–28th April 2011 considered the


115



decided to issue Showcause notice. Accordingly, Showcause notice was issued to the institution on 01.06.2011. The institution has submitted its written representation on 26.06.2011.

The committee considered the written reply and all other relevant documents and decided to cause re-inspection at the premises Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. The institution is directed to submit inspection fee of Rs. 40,000/-.

68. APS01996B.EdSri. Nirvanaswamy College of Education, Bangalore RuralKA

Sri.Nirvanaswamy College of Education, Sree Degula Math, Kanakapur-562117, Bangalore Rural District, Karnataka

Sri. Nirvanaswamy College of Education, Sree Degula Math, Kanakapur-562117, Bangalore Rural District, Karnataka was granted recognition for offering B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students vide order dated 02.12.2004.

The institution in its letter dated 17.10.2007 has submitted a proposal for shifting of premises along with D.D of Rs.40,000/- towards shifting fee. Inspection was carried out on 25th October 2010. The inspection report has been received along with VCD.

The SRC in its 198th meeting held on 24-26 November 2010 considered the VT report and all relevant documentary evidences and decided to issue showcase notice. Accordingly, Showcase Notice was issued to the institution on 10.01.2011. The institution has submitted its written representation on 07.02.2011.

The SRC in its 201st meeting held on 22-23 February 2011 considered the reply to Showcase notice, VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to issue Final Showcase Notice. Accordingly, Final Showcase Notice was issued to the institution on 18.03.2011. The institution has submitted its written representation on 15.04.2011.

The SRC in its 205th meeting held on 18-19 May 2011 considered written representation of the institution and decided to issue showcase notice. Accordingly, Showcase notice was issued to the institution on 27.06.2011. The institution has submitted representation on 29.07.2011.


In the same building in the first floor, a PU College is functioning and in the third floor of the same building, an I.T.I is also functioning. The management is sharing B.Ed course


116



along with the other programmes. The management has admitted that Pre-University course classes are being in the same building in which B.Ed course is being run.

Approved Land Usage Certificate from the concerned Government authorities stating that the land is exclusively permitted/ sanctioned for Educational Purposes.

Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the recognition of the B.Ed course (APS01996) run by the Sri Nirvanaswamy College of Education,Sree Degula Math, Kanakaapur-562117, Bangalore Rural District, Karnataka, from the academic year 2012.13, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in B.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.


The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly. Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited with SRC NCTE, Bangalore.

69. APS04202B.EdArunachala College of Education, ThiruvannamalaiTN

ARUNACHALA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT, TAMILNADU

Arunachala College of Education, Thiruvannamalai District, Tamilnadu has submitted an application for seeking grant of recognition to B.Ed course on 29.12.2004.

The application was processed and recognition was granted for offering B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students on 18.10.2005 at Old No.26, New No.74, Kosa street, Thiruvannamalai-606601, Tamilnadu with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.

Some same institutions, which have been granted recognition for the subsequent year, based on belated endorsements preferred an appeal to NCTE-Hqrs. and contended that a few institutions which have submitted belated endorsements were granted recognition for the current academic year. SRC, in its comments to the NCTE-Hqrs. explained that this has occurred due to oversight and would modify such orders which have been wrongly issued. Pursuant to this, the NCTE-New Delhi vide order no.F.No.89-156/2005-Appeal dated 28th September, 2005 remanded back the cases to the SRC, Bangalore with a direction to reconsider the cases immediately for granting recognition from 2005-2006 at par with other similar cases who have been granted recognition for 2005-2006.

The matter was placed before SRC in its 103rd meeting held on 27th and


117



28th October, 2005 and SRC after obtaining considered legal opinion in this regard, had taken decision to review its recognition orders issued for the session 2006-2007 and to grant recognition for the session 2005-06 to those institutions who have submitted belated NOC’s/Endorsements as one time exception.

The SRC in its 104th meeting held on 9th November 2005 decided to extend the relaxation to the institutions which have submitted other essential documents mentioned in Appendix 1B, belatedly. Accordingly, as per Public Notice of SRC, a modified recognition order was issued to the institution vide order no. F.TN/SEC/SRO/NCTE/2005-2006/3817 dated 03.11.2005 for B.Ed course from the academic session 2005-06.

The SRC in its 181st meeting held on 20-21st August 2009 where in it was decided that the institution which have not shifted to the permanent premises even after the expiry of three years time limit be issued notice under section 17 of NCTE Act for further action. Accordingly notice was issued to the institution on 15.09.2009. The institution did not submit its reply.

The list of institutions where notices were returned undelivered and reply not received were published in the website on 20.7.2010 giving 10 days to submit reply. The institution did not submitted its reply.

The SRC considered the matter in its 196th meeting held on 15th-16th

September 2010 and, it has decided to issue notice. Accordingly notice was issued to the institution on 26.10.2010. The institution has submitted its written representation alongwith DD of Rs.40000/- towards inspection fee on 06.12.2010.

The committee in its 199th meeting held on 22nd-23rd December, 2011 considered the written reply and other relevant documents submitted by the institution and decided to cause Shifting inspection at the new premises and to ascertain infrastructural and instructional facilities under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly the shifting inspection of the institution was fixed between 14th-18th March 2011. The same was intimated to the institution on 03.03.2011. Inspection of the institution was conducted on 15.03.2011.

The Committee in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April, 2011 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly show cause notice was issued to the institution on 05.05.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 03.06.2011. The management is also running M.Ed. (APSO7717) course in the same building.


118



The Committee in its 206th meeting held on 09th –10th June, 2011 considered the VT Report, reply of the institution vide its letter dt. 03.06.2011 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Final Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a final show cause notice was issued to the institution on. 04.07.2011, the institution has submitted the reply on 05.07.2011.

The Committee considered the reply of the institution Dt. 05.07.2011, VT report of the institution and all other related documents along with the original file of the institution and it was decided that shifting to new/permanent premises be permitted for B.Ed (APS04202) course.

70. APS04608B.EdArumugam Nallamani College of Education, MaduraiTN

ARUMUGAM NALLAMANI COLLEGE OF EDUCAITON, MADURAI, TAMILNADU.

Arumugam Nallamani College of Education, Madurai, Tamilnadu was granted recognition for offering B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students on 23.12.2005 with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.

The SRC in its 181st meeting held on 20-21st August 2009 where in it was decided that the institutions which have not shifted to the permanent premises even after the expiry of three years time limit be issued notice under section 17 of NCTE Act for further action.

A notice was issued to the institution on 17.09.2009. The institution did not submit its reply even after completion of stipulated period. As per the direction, the list of such institution were published in the website on 20.7.2010 giving 10 days to submit reply.

The stipulated period has expired, the institution did not submit its reply, SRC considered the matter in its 196th meeting held on 15th-16th

September 2010 and decided to issue show cause notice to institution as to why recognition be not withdrawn. Notice was issued to the institution on 26.10.2010 to submit the essential documents. The institution submitted reply vide its letter dated 24.12.2010.

The committee in its 200th meeting held on 20th-21st January 2011 considered the written reply and other documents submitted by the institution and decided to cause composite inspection for all the courses at the new premises Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. The institution is directed to submit the following within 30 days of the receipt of the notice, duly filled in Questionnaire along with all the necessary documents for land, building approval and completion certificate from a competent Govt. Engineer and other relevant documents and in anticipation of inspection fee of Rs. 40000/- towards each of the course being run.


119



Accordingly the shifting inspection of the institution was fixed between 14th-18th March 2011. The same was intimated to the institution on 03.03.2011. Accordingly inspection of the institution was conducted on 14.03.2011.

The Committee in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April 2011 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a final show cause notice was issued to the institution on 06.05.2011, the institution has submitted the in its reply on 12.07.2011.

The Committee considered the reply of the institution Dt. 12.07.2011, VT report of the institution and all other related documents along with the original file of the institution and it was decided that shifting to new/permanent premises is permitted for B.Ed (APS04608) course.

71. APS05738D.T.EdA.S. Teacher Training Institute, Dharmapuri

TN

A.S. Techer Training Institute, Nachinampatti Village, H.Dodampatti Post, Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri District – 636901, Tamilnadu.

A.S. Techer Training Institute, Nachinampatti Village, H.Dodampatti Post, Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri District – 636901, Tamilnadu has submitted application for D.T.Ed course on 02.04.2006. The institution has been granted recognition for D.T.Ed on 09.01.2007 with an intake of 50 students with the condition to shift to its own premises within 3 years from the date of recognition.

The Director of Teacher Education, Research and Training, Chennai-600006 forwarded a copy of inspection report dt.23.10.2010 of the institution which was considered by SRC in its 202nd meeting held on 14-15 March 2011 and decided to issue showcause notice. Accordingly, Showcause notice was issued to the institution on 15.04.2011. The institution has submitted its written representation on 14.06.2011.

The committee considered the written reply and other relevant documents submitted by the institution and decided to cause inspection for shifting at the new premises and to ascertain infrastructural and instructional facilities Under Section 17 of NCTE Act.

72. APS01289D.T.EdAnnai Terasa Women Teacher Training Institute, Salem.TN

ANNAI TERASA WOMEN TEACHER TRAINING INSTITUTE, SALEM DISTIRICT, TAMILNADU.Christian Mission Educational Trust, Salem, Tamilnadu has submitted an application in the name of Annai Theresa Teacher Training Institute & Annai Terasa College of Education, Thammampatty, Salem District, Tamilnadu for conducting B.Ed course (APS05948), D.T.Ed (APS01289) & D.T.Ed-AI (APS05909). Recognition was granted to B.Ed course on 09.01.2007, D.T.Ed course on 20.01.2005 and D.T.Ed-AI course on


120



24.10.2006.

A complaint was received against Chirstian Mission Educational Trust, Salem, Tamilnadu for offering Annai Theresa Teacher Training Institute, Thammampatty, Salem District, Tamilnadu for conducting D.T.Ed, D.T.Ed-AI & B.Ed courses stating that the institution is lacking with regard to infrastructure and instructional facilities

The complaint was considered by SRC in its 182nd meeting held on 31st

August 2009 and decided to issue show cause notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act for all the courses in order to call for remarks on the complaint along with questionnaire. Accordingly, show cause notice were issued for all the three courses on 1.10.2009.

The institution has submitted its reply on 22.10.2009, which was placed in 187th meeting of SRC held on 29th and 30th December 2009. SRC considered the written representation of the institution and decided to cause Inspection Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Again the matter was placed in SRC in its 192nd meeting held on 10th-11th May 2010 and decided that “copy of the complaint “excerpts” pertaining to the concerned institutions had already been given to the concerned institutions and the remarks of the institutions were also obtained and considered by the SRC; and hence the visit to the institution be proceeded, without any further delay, in anticipation of the inspection fee of Rs.40,000/- payable on this account as upheld by the Hon’ble High Court of Madras.

As per the decision of SRC, inspection of the institution was conducted on 8th June 2010. The VT report alongwith original file was considered by SRC in its 193rd meeting held on 21st-22nd June 2010. The Committee decided to issue notice to the institution for all the courses on 29.07.2010. The institution submitted its reply on 18.08.2010.

The SRC considered the reply in its 196th meeting held on 15th-16th

September 2010 and the committee decided to cause re-inspection for all the courses on receipt of the filed in Questionnaire, including all the relevant documents. The committee decided that the Arul Teacher Training Institute bearing APS0 No. 8066 in the same campus be also be inspected to verify whether it has exclusive and separate infrastructure facilities.

A letter calling for documents alongwith Questionnaire was issued on 26.10.2010. The institution did not submit its reply. Inspection of the institution was fixed between 18th-25th November 2010 and the same was intimated to the institution on 08.11.2010. But inspection could not be conducted by VT members because institution has not allowed VT members to inspect.


121



The institution submitted a letter dated 23.11.2010 to the VT members “stating NCTE inspecting authority members visited our institution to inspect the institution on 23.11.2010. Already we filed a pending case to the high court, Chennai W.P.No. 25842/2010. We are expecting the stay order from the court. In this movement we are not able to face the inspection after getting the court order, if the court may be order to face the inspection., we will ready to cooperate the inspection.”The Court order dated 19.11.2010 has been received from the Hon’ble High Court of Madras stating as follows:

“The learned counsel for the respondent has brought to the notice of this court that by proceedings dated 26.10.2010, the petitioner was served with a notice calling upon to produce certain documents, besides giving 15 days time for submission of the reply also. However, on receipt of the reply, the respondent can inspect and verify the stand taken in the reply given by the petitioner institution. Besides, the power of inspection of the respondent with the petitioner institution cannot be curtailed basing on the last inspection done. According to the learned counsel, as far as the impugned notice dated 8.11.2010 is concerned, it is by mistake, the same has been issued and no further steps will be taken basing on the notice dated 8.11.2010, which is under challenge in this writ petition. However, depending on the reply to be furnished by the petitioner institution for the notice dated 26.10.2010, further steps, including inspection, will be done by the respondent institution.

Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent, this writ petition is closed, setting aside the impugned notice dated 8.11.2010. No costs. M.P. Nos.1 and 2 of 2010 are closed”.

The reply was not received from the institution to the notice dt. 26.10.2010. The committee in its 200th meeting held on 20th-21st January 2011 considered the matter and decided to issue Notice under Sec 17 of NCTE Act to the institution giving 30 days time for reply to the earlier notice issued to the institution dt. 26.10.2010 calling for documents along with Questionnaire and then process the reply for inspection after submission of Rs. 40000/- towards inspection fee for each of the courses being run by the institution.

A Notice was again issued to the institution on 03.03.2011 to submit the relevant documents following as called for in letter dated 26.10.2010. The institution vide its letter dated 01.04.2011 instead of submitting enclosed above documents alongwith filled in questionnaire and D.D of Rs.40,000/- requested to visit the college directly and consider the application and do the need full action as early as your favour.

The matter was considered by the Committee in its 204 th meeting 27th-28th


122



April 2011 considered the VT Report, and it was decided to serve Final Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a final show cause notice was issued to the institution on 27.05.2011, the institution has submitted in its reply on 24.06.2011.

The committee considered the written reply of the institution Dt. 24.06.2011 and all other relevant documents submitted by the institution and decided to cause inspection at the new premises to ascertain infrastructural and instructional facilities Under Section 17 of NCTE Act.

73. APS03764 / APS04875D.T.Ed / D.T.Ed-AIPDR Vellachiammal Teacher Training Institute, Dharmapuri.TN

PDR Vellachiammal Teacher Training Institute, Sekkamapatti, Harur Taluk-636902, Dharmapuri District, Tamilnadu

PDR Vellachiammal Teacher Training Institute, Sekkamapatti, Harur Taluk-636902, Dharmapuri District, Tamilnadu has submitted an application for D.T.Ed Course on 20.12.2011. The institution was granted recognition on 23.11.2005 with an intake of 50 students. Further, the institution has submitted application for D.T.Ed-AI on 02.01.2006. The institution was grated recognition on 08.11.2006 with an intake of 50 students, thus making an annual intake of 100 students, which includes the existing intake of 50 and additional intake of 50 students, with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.

The institution vide its letter dated 25.03.2011 stated as follows “NCTE-SRC accorded recognition to PDR Vellachiammal Teacher Training Institute, Sekkampatti, Dharmapuri District initially for an intake of 50 students and then an additional intake of 50 students.

From 2010-11, we have not made any admission to D.El.Ed course and the same was intimated to DTERT, Chennai. We want to suspend the D.El.Ed course for a further period of 5 years from 2011-12 onwards. Before the commencement of the counseling for 2011-12, DTERT has been duly informed through the DIET, Dharmapuri that we are not admitting students in D.El.Ed course during 2011-12.

The request that the NCTE (SRC) Bangalore may be pleased to record the suspension of D.El.Ed course for 5 years from 2011-12 by PDR Vellachiammal Teacher Training Institute, Dharmapuri District and the same may be intimated to DTERT. The recording of the suspension of D.El.Ed course by our institute for 5 years from 2011-12 may kindly be intimated to us”.

The Committee in its 204th meeting 27th-28th April 2011 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a Final Show cause notice was issued to the institution on


123



01.06.2011. The institution has submitted in its reply on 06.07.2011.

The Institution was granted recognition in temporary premises to run D.T.Ed course on 23.11.2005 & D.T.Ed-Al on 08.11.2006 with a condition that it should shift to its own permanent premises in 3 years. i.e., on or before 22.11.2008. The Institution is still running in temporary premises and not shifted to new premises even after lapse of time period of more than 5 years and 05 months.

The institution vide its letter dated 06.07.2011 stated as follows:

“The reference 2nd cited we have only requested suspension of D.T.Ed course for 5 years as there is no response, vide our letter dt. 25.03.2011. For our letter, we have not received any other reference earlier from NCTE. But, you have stated that this is the final show cause notice. It is surprises us.

The Show cause notice, vide para 5, you have referred to the V.T. Report.(based on VCD and other documentary evidences). As we are not aware of any V.T. Report regarding P.D.R. T.T.I, we request that a copy of the V.T. Report on P.D.R.V. T.T.I may kindly be furnished to us, enabling to understand on what basis this show cause notice has been issued.

Without knowing the actual deficiencies noted in the V.T.Report, we are not in a position to reply to the show cause notice. It is not correct to state that we have not moved to permanent building without ascertaining the truth already known to you.

Therefore, we pray that the Hon’ble NCTE(SRC) may be pleased to furnish a copy of the full V.T. report enabling us to submit our reply against the withdrawal of Recognition to out TTI.

We may be also clarified as to whether NCTE(SRC) has power to suspend the course for a particular period based on the request of the Teacher Training Institute or the institute has to surrender the Recognition order without asking for suspension”.

Note: As per NCTE regulations there is no provisions for suspension of recognition of courses already granted recognition.

As per MIS list the institution is running Six Courses with total intake of 485 students. MIS list is enclosed.

The committee considered the written reply and other relevant documents and decided to cause composite inspection at the premises Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. The institution is directed to


124



submit the following within 30 days of the receipt of the notice, such as, duly filled in Questionnaire along with all the necessary documents for land, building approval and completion certificate from a competent Govt. Engineer and other relevant documents along with Demand Draft of Rs.40,000/- inspection fee per course in favour of “The Member Secretary, NCTE” payable at Bangalore.

Consideration of the VTR Under Section 17 : (Vol- 4)Sl.No.

CodeCourse


State

Remarks of SRC

74 APS01104

D.T.Ed

Roseline Teacher

Training Institute,

Sivagangai.

TN

Roseline Teacher Training Institute, Sivagangai District, Tamilnadu

Roseline Teacher Training Institute, Sivagangai District, Tamilnadu has submitted an application for seeking granted of recognition to D.T.Ed course.

The application was processed and recognition was granted for offering D.T.Ed course with an intake of 50 students on 28.10.2004 and additional intake of 50 was granted on 03.09.2005 at Roseline Teacher Training Institute, Victoria nagar, Sivagangai-630551, Tamilnadu, with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.

The institution vide its letter dated 09.10.2007 submitted Rs.40,000/- stating that the institution is running in the permanent premises with required infrastructural facilities from its inception.

The Inspection of the institution was fixed on 30th-May to 4th June 2011, Accordingly, the same was informed on 23.05.2011. Inspection of the institution was conducted on 02.06.2011,


125



The Committee considered the VT Report, and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following:

As per VT report, the earmarked area for D.T.Ed course is only 10810 Sq.ft. which is grossly inadequate for D.T.Ed course. As per NCTE norms 16000 Sq.Ft is required for the course.

In the Building plan built up area is not mentioned.

Non--encumbrance Certificate from the competent Government Authorised person / Authority. To be submitted.

The Sy.Nos of land documents not tallying with building plan and in building completion certificate.

In the Affidavit submitted, Sy.Nos are not mentioned.

Seating capacity in the library is not available/mentioned.

Staff salary is not paid as per Central/State Govt./UGC guidelines.

Salary is paid by cash not through Bank Cheque.


75 APS04439D.T.Ed

SRET Teacher Training Institute, Namakkal.

TN

SRET Teacher Training Institute, Namakkal District, Tamilnadu

SRET Teacher Training Institute, Namakkal, Tamilnadu submitted application for granted of recognition to D.T.Ed course on 01.12.2005.

The application was processed and recognition was granted for offering D.T.Ed course with an intake of 50 students on 09.08.2006 at no. 688, JKK Sundaram Nagar, Komarapalayam-638183. Namakkal District, Tamilnadu with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.

The institution vide its letter dated 12.12.2008. Sumitted its proposal for shifting of premises along with Rs. 40,000/-.


126



Accordingly the inspection of the institution was fixed between 30th May to 4th June. The same was intimated to the institution. Accordingly inspection of the institution was conducted on 01.06.2011.

The management is also running two units of B.Ed (APS04432 & APS03278) & two units of M.Ed (APS07649 & APS07646) in the same building along with D.T.Ed course.

The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following:

The details of earmarked built up area coursewise are to be given.

Address of the land as per the questionnaire is not submitted.

Non--encumbrance Certificate from the competent Government Authorised person / Authority, is to be submitted.

Byelaws of the Society are to be submitted by the management.


No. of books in the library is only 3198, which is inadequate as per NCTE norms.


76 APS00407D.Ed

Rural Teacher Training Institute, Devanahalli.

KA

Rural Teacher Training Institute, Rural District, Karnataka

Rural Teacher Training Institute, D.S.Road, Devanahalli – 562110, Bangalore Rural District, Karnataka was granted recognition for offering D.Ed course with an intake of 90 students vide order dated 01.10.1996.

NCTE, Hqrs vide its letter dated 22.06.2010 has forwarded a copy of the inspection report dated 19.04.2010 conducted under section 13 of NCTE


127



Act. As there are deficiencies pointed out in the inspection report, NCTE, Hqrs has requested SRC to initiate action against the institution under section 17 of the NCTE Act immediately.

The SRC in its 194th meeting held on 21st -22nd July, 2010 considered the letter from NCTE-Hqrs, VT report and original file of the institution and decided to serve Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. The institution has submitted written representation on 03.09.2010.

The SRC in its 197th meeting held on 13-14 October 2010 considered the written representation submitted by the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for D.Ed course.

Hence, it is decided to withdraw the recognition given to the institution with effect from the year 2012-2013, to enable the current batch of students to complete their second year of the programme. But the institution is debarred from making any further fresh admission from this date of issue of this order. The affiliating / examining body be informed accordingly.

Accordingly, order is withdrawing recognition was issued to the institution on 06.12.2010.

The institution preferred an appeal to NCTE, Hqrs and the Appellate Authority vide order dated 26.05.2011 has reversed the withdrawal order of SRC with direction to get another comprehensive inspection done on payment of requisite fee by the institution immediately, to verify as to whether the institution is functioning in conformity with the provisions of the NCTE Act/Regulations and for further decision thereafter.

Further, the institution in its letter dated 06.06.2011 has submitted Demand Draft bearing No.434781 dated 06.06.2011 for Rs.40,000/- towards inspection fee. The institution has requested to conduct inspection as per Appellate Authority order.

The committee in its 206th meeting held on 09th-10th June, 2011 considered the Appellate authority order dt. 26.05.2011 and decided to cause Composite inspection for all the courses run by of the institution under Section 17 of NCTE Act.

The inspection was conducted under Section 17 on 27.07.2011


The built up area as per VT report is 16516 sq.ft, as per


128



building completion certificate, it is 11,000 sq.ft. in addition, as per building plan, it is 15716 sq.ft. This discrepancy in built up area may be explained.

Approved building plan from competent Govt. authority is to be submitted. In the building plan, total area is not mentioned.

In the Affidavit submitted mode of possession of land is not mentioned.


Notarised copy of Land usage certificate issued by competent authority is to be submitted.

Salary is paid by cash not through Bank Cheque.In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available, with no further notice.

77 APS02172 / APS06150

D.Ed / D.Ed-AIBangalore City College of Diploma in Education, Bangalore.

KA

Bangalore City College of Diploma in Education, Bangalore-560043, KarnatakaBangalore City College of Diploma in Education, No.160, Chelekere Main Road, Kalyanagar Post, Bangalore – 560 043, Karnataka has submitted application for D.Ed course on 31.12.2003. The institution was granted recognition for offering D.Ed course on 25.11.2004 with an intake of 100 students which includes existing intake of 50 students and additional intake of 50 students.

The institution was given recognition for B.Ed course on 30.12.2005 and M.Ed recognition was given on 23.02.2009.


The SRC in its 194th meeting held on 21-22 July 2010 considered the report and decided to issue Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, Notice was issued to the institution 31.08.2010. The institution


129



has submitted written representation on 02.09.2010.

The SRC in its 197th meeting held on 13-14 October 2010 considered the written representation submitted by the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for D.Ed, D.Ed-Adl, B.Ed., M..Ed courses, as the institution is running all the above mentioned courses along with Pre-University College with grossly inadequate built up area and decided to withdraw the recognition given to the institution.

The recognition is withdrawn with immediate effect from academic year 2011-2012 for the following courses: (APS02368) B.Ed and (APS07204) M.Ed programmes the committee decides to withdraw the recognition for D.Ed Course (APS02172), D.Ed – AI (APS06150) with effect from 2012-13, as a special case in order to enable the on going batch of students in D.Ed course, if any, to complete their final year course. Accordingly, order withdrawing recognition was issued to the institution on 06.12.2010.

The institution preferred an appeal to NCTE, Hqrs and the appellate authority vide order dated 26.05.2011 has reversed the withdrawal order of SRC with a direction to cause composite inspection for all the courses and to take an appropriate action thereafter.

The committee in its 205th meeting held on 09th-10th June, 2011 considered the Appellate authority order dt. 26.05.2011 and decided to cause Composite inspection for all the courses run by the institution Under Section 17 of NCTE Act.

Accordingly the inspection of the institution was fixed between 28th-29th

July, 2011. The same was intimated to the institution. Accordingly inspection of the institution was conducted on 29.07.2011.

The management is also running D.Ed, D.Ed-Al. B.Ed & M.Ed courses in the same building.


The built up area as per affidavit is 9000 sq.ft, as per VT report area earmarked for D.T.Ed is 17379 sq.ft. This discrepancy may be explained.

Built up area as per Building plan is 19472 sq.ft; and as per BCC, it is 38944 sq.ft. This discrepancy may be explained.

The earmarked built up area for each of the course be given.


130



Approved building plan from competent Govt. authority is to be submitted. In the building plan total area is not mentioned.

In the Affidavit submitted mode of possession of land is not mentioned.

Building completion certificate from competent Govt. engineer is to be submitted.



Salary is paid by cash not through Bank Cheque.In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available, with no further notice.

78 APS207204M.Ed

Bangalore City College of Post Graduate in Education, Bangalore.

KA

Bangalore City College of Post Graduate in Education, No.160, Chelekere Main Road, Kalyanagar Post, Bangalore – 560 043, Karnataka has submitted application for M.Ed course on 02.06.2006. The institution was granted recognition for M.Ed course on 23.02.2009 with an intake of 35 students.

The institution was given recognition for D.Ed course on 25.11.2004 and B.Ed recognition was given on 30.12.2005.


The SRC in its 194th meeting held on 21-22 July 2010 considered the V.T report and decided to issue Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, Notice was issued to the institution 31.08.2010. The institution has submitted written representation on 23.09.2010.


131









The management is also running D.Ed, D.Ed-Al. B.Ed courses in the same building.

The Committee considered the reply of the institution, VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following:

As per VT report, the earmarked area for M.Ed course in 15177 sq.ft and as per affidavit, it is 2000 sq.mts. This discrepancy may be explained.

Total area of the site as per building plan is not mentioned.

Total built up area as per building plan is not mentioned.


132



Total area as per land document is not mentioned.

Approved building plan from competent Govt. authority is to be submitted.





Psychology lab is not available.


79 APS02368B.Ed

Bangalore City College of Education, Bangalore.

KA

Bangalore City College of Education, No.115, Vijaya Colony Road, Near petrol Bunk, Doddabanaswadi, Bangalore – 560043, Karnataka has submitted an application for offering B.Ed course on 31.12.2003. The institution was granted recognition for B.Ed course on 30.12.2005 with an intake of 100 students.

The institution was given recognition for D.Ed course on 25.11.2004 and M.Ed recognition was given on 23.02.2009.


The SRC in its 194th meeting held on 21-22 July 2010 considered the report and decided to issue Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, Notice was issued to the institution 31.08.2010. The institution has submitted written representation on 23.09.2010.


133









The management is also running D.Ed, D.Ed-Al. & M.Ed courses in the same building.


As per VT, report the built up area earmarked for B.Ed course is 19784 sq.ft, and as per affidavit, it is 3799 sq.mts. This discrepancy may be explained.

Approved building plan from competent Govt. authority is to be submitted.



134







80 APS00230B.Ed

Osmania Graduates Association and Exhibition Society College, Rangareddy.

AP

Osmania Graduates Association & Exhibition Society College, Chevella Revenue Division, Pargi, Rangareddy District, Andhra Pradesh.

Brief notes of recognition of the college:Slno.

Name of the institution with address

Remarks

01 Osmania Graduates Association & Exhibition Society College, Chevella Revenue Division, Pargi, Rangareddy District, Andhra Pradesh

Recognition order issued vide this office order dated 28.02.2003 for 100 students

02 Proposal submitted by the institution for shifting premises

08.07.2009

03 Fees of shifting premises D.D. of 40,000/- vide No.846134/14936 dated 29.07.2009

04 Date of Inspection 12.02.201105 Place of New site of

inspection with addressOsmania Graduates Association & Exhibition Society College of Education, Opp.Govt. Junior College, Vidhyaranya Puri, Pargi, Rangareddy District, Andhra Pradesh

The Committee considered the reply of the institution, VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided


135



to serve Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following:

Certified copy of the Land documents approved by Govt. authority is to be submitted.

In the Affidavit the plot No. 130/1and 180/1 are different from the address of land.

In the building plan the Sy.Nos are not mentioned.

The multipurpose hall size is less than required size of 2000 sq.ft as per regulation.




Psychology lab & Education Technology lab is to be strengthened.


81 APS00037B.Ed

A.S.R. College of Education, West Godavari.

AP

A.S.R College of Education, Kovvur Revenue Division Srinivasapuram, Near Tole Gate Road, Kovvur, West Godavari District – 534350, Andhra Pradesyh.Brief notes of recognition of the college:

Slno.


Remarks

01 A.S.R College of Education, Kovvur Revenue division,

Recognition order issued vide this office order dated


136



Srinivasapuram, Near Tole Gate Road, Kovvur, West Godavari District – 534350, Andhra Pradesh

04.04.2003 for 100 students.


12.11.2007

03 Fees of shifting premises D.D of 40,000/- vide no. 012776/13793 dated 07.02.2008

04 Date of Inspection 11.02.201105 Place of New site of inspection

with addressA.S.R College of Education, Srinivasapuram, Near Road Cum Rail Bridge, Kovvur – 534350, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.


As per the sale deed, the executor and execute are one and the same, i.e, “Akula Sriramulu Educational Society”, this is against the NCTE norms.

As per the VT report, total earmarked area for B.Ed and D.Ed is 16668 sq.ft & 12500 sq.ft respectively. This is inadequate and the total built up area requirement is 32000 sq.ft as per NCTE norms.

Affidavit in the prescribed form on Rs. 100/- stamp paper duly attested by Oath Commissioner or Notary Public is to be submitted.




137



82 APS02622D.Ed

Ghulam Ahmed College of Elementary Education, Hyderabad.

AP

Brief History in respect of Ghulam Ahmed College of Elementary Education, 8-2-249, Mount Pleasant Road No-3, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-500034, Andhra Pradesh. Course-D.Ed. ( Code No. APS02622), (B.Ed-0191), (M. Ed- 0028).

Ghulam Ahmed College of Education, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh has submitted application for additional intake in B.Ed course on 28.10.2009.A deficiency letter was issued to the university on 22.12.2009. The institution submitted its written representation on 02.03.2010. The reply for deficiency letter was placed before SRC in its 190th meeting held on 29-30 March 2010 and SRC decided to cause inspection. Accordingly, inspection was carried out to the institution on 08.05.2010.On careful perusal of the original file of the institution, Visiting Team Report, Video CD, other related documents, Act of NCTE, 1993, Regulations and guidelines of NCTE published from time to time laid on the table, written representation from the institution, the Regional Committee in its 192nd Meeting held on 10-11 May, 2010 decided to refuse recognition to the B.Ed-AI course for the following reasons: - The institution is already having B.Ed. course, D.Ed. course and M.Ed.

course. Total built-up area is 3804 sq. mtrs. As per norms of NCTE, 3500 sq.mtrs. is required for the existing courses and 500 sq.mtrs. additional built up area is required for the proposed course.

MBA, Law College, Junior College, Pharmacy College, a public school and Engineering College are all run in the same educational complex with no separate demarcation of land/ building for the Teacher Education courses.

The Committee also decided to serve Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act, for the existing D.Ed., B.Ed. and M.Ed. course for non-fulfilment of the infrastructural and instructional facilities as per NCTE norms. Accordingly, notice was issued to the institution on 09.07.2010 for D.Ed course. The institution has submitted its written representation on 23.07.2010.

The written representation was considered by the Committee in its 195 th

meeting held on 17-18 August, 2010 and it was decided to cause inspection of the institution for M.Ed., B.Ed. and D.Ed. Course, under Section 17 of NCTE Act, on payment of Rs.40,000/- inspection fee for each course and on submission of filled in Questionnaire, along with relevant supporting documents relating to building, land, including Building Completion Certificate from the competent Government Engineer and Land Use Certificate, within 21 days.As per the decision of SRC the letter was sent on 22.09.2010. Till date


138



institution not submitted its written representation/documents and Inspection fee. The committee decided to cause composite inspection of the institution for M.Ed., B.Ed. and D.Ed. Courses, under Section 17 of NCTE Act, in anticipation of payment of Rs.40,000/- inspection fee for each course and on submission of filled in Questionnaire, along with relevant supporting documents relating to building, land, including Building Completion Certificate from the competent Government Engineer and Land Use Certificate, within 21 days.Meanwhile a complaint was received from the original owner of the land requesting to take stringent action against Ghulam Ahmed College of Education.In the above context a complaint letter dated 09.05.2011, has been received through CP NCTE. The complaint submitted that he is the absolute owner of ancestral property “Mount Pleasant” bearing MCH. No. 8-2-249 to 269, admeasuring Ac.24.10 gts, Road No.3, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Which is governed by a family trust in the name of his father Prince Muazzam Jah. By adopting fraudulent methods, a society by name Ul-Uloom education society took possession of above said ancestral property and started college of B.Ed, M.Ed and D.Ed., by name Ghulam Ahmed College of Education. The owner neither signed a lease agreement nor have sold the land to the said society. The owner came to know the society has given a wrong declaration to NCTE that society have perfect title over the property which is absolutely false. The society has also lost all cases filled against the owner family in the civil and High courts. Therefore the owner request to enquire into the matter and ascertain the truth.Complaint of Himayath Ali Mirza is placed before SRC.Inspection of the above Institution has been caused and VTR’s are placed before SRC also.

The management is running D.Ed, B.Ed & M.Ed prgrammes in the same building.

The inspection was carried out on 24.03.2011.


Multipurpose hall size is 900 sq.ft which is less than NCTE norms.



139



In the Affadvit, submitted, total area and survey Nos are not clear and visible.


In the Land documents submitted, survey Nos are not clear and visible properly.

Science lab, Psychology lab & Education Technology lab needs to be strengthened.

Staff salary is not paid as per State Govt./UGC guidelines.

Further, a complaint was received from Mr. Himayhath Ali Mirza stating that he is the original owner of the land where the existing college is running. Clarification is to be sought from the institution and a copy of the complaint is to be sent the college.


83 APS00263B.Ed

Nalanda College of Education, Mahabubnagar.

AP

-Nalanda College of Education, Mahabubnagar Revenue Division, # 1-10-85/5/A/3, S.S. Guva New Town, Mahabubnagar District-509001, Andhra Pradesh.

Brief notes of recognition of the college:

SlNo.


Remarks

01 Nalanda College of Teacher Eduation, Mahabubnagar Revenue Division, # 1-10-85/5/A/3, S.S.Guva New Town, Mahabubnagar District-509001, Andhra Pradesh.

The Institution has submitted application on 31.12.2001 and the Recognition order was issued vide order dated 03.03.2003 with an intake of 120 students.


07.10.2009

03 Fees of shifting premises D.D of 40,000/- vide no. 14995 dated 07.10.2009

04 Date of Inspection 09.02.2011


140



05 Place of New site of inspection with address

Sy.no. 32 & 33 Malleboinpally village, Jadcheria Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.





Further, a complaint was received from Mr. Himayhath Ali Mirza stating that he is the original owner of the land where the existing college is running. Clarification is sought from the institution and a copy of the complaint is to be sent to the college.

Psychology lab & Education Technology lab needs to be strengthened.

Science lab needs to be strengthened.

Staff salary is not paid as per State Govt./UGC guidelines.


84 APS04266D.Ed

Dr. K.S.P.R. College of Education, Guntur.

An application was submitted by DR.K.S.P.R College of Education, No.116/2001, Narasaraopet, Guntur, District-5226021, Andhra Pradesh for grant of recognition to D.Ed course in the office of SRC-NCTE, Bangalore vide dated 15.10.2004 under NCTE notification dated 5.1.2004 dispensed with the requirement of NOC of the State Government from the institutions running B.Ed college and invited applications for D.Ed course from different institutions for grant of recognition to Elementary Teacher


141



APEducation courses under Sarva Shikshana Ahiyan (SSA).

The application was under process and meanwhile, the Government of Andhra Pradesh of Hyderabad filed a Writ Petition No.22866 of 2005 in the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh of Hyderabad challenging the Notification of NCTE with regard to the dispensing with the requirement of NOC from the State Government. The writ petition was allowed by the learned single judge with the directions that the rule excluding the State Government is bad. Against said judgement a Writ Appeal No.692 of 2006 was filed in the Division Bench of Hon’ble High Court of Hyderabad. Many discussions took place between the State Government of Andhra Pradesh and SRC-NCTE. However, neither State Government withdrew the case filed by them nor the stay was vacated.

Some institutions went to the court and filed writ petitions individually, seeking directions for processing of their applications, in one of such Writ Petition No.8278 of 2008, the Hon’ble High Court decided that the applications of the institutions shall be processed as per the NCTE rules and regulations norms and standards existing as on date.

As per the direction of Hon’ble High Court and decision of SRC for processing of pending D.Ed application as per new regulation of NCTE in its 164th meeting held on 20th September 2008, the SRC started to process the applications.In view of the above decision, a deficiency letter was issued to the institution vide dated 26.09.2008.

Meanwhile SRC in its 135th meeting held on 7-8 June 2007 had already decided to treat the applications which have not submitted compliance as closed after the expiry of 90 days of time as per the regulations of NCTE 2005. A letter dated 31.10.2008 was also received from NCTE Hqrs clarifying that all such cases where letter of deficiency has been issued but no reply has been received from the concerned institution within 90 days may also be closed in terms of Section 7(1) of the NCTE Regulations.

In this case too the Institution has failed to submit the reply within 90 days. After consideration of facts and also non-submission of reply to the deficiency letter within the stipulated time, it is decided to close the application.

As per the decision of SRC closure letter was issued on 02.03.2009.

The Institute has approached to Hon’ble High Court in W.P.No.4707/2011

Now, the Hon’ble High Court has passed an order on 09.03.2011 vide W.P.No.4707 of 2011 reads as hereunder:“It is to be noted that this Court disposed of similar matters granting some time to the institutions to comply the deficiencies and directing the authority concerned to consider the applications by applying the policy,


142



which was in existence at that time. In that view of the matter, as it is the case of the petitioner that it has not received letter, dated 26.09.2008 notifying the deficiencies, I deem it appropriate to set aside order, dated 02.03.2009 passed in F.SRO/NCTE/2008-09/9803, and permit the petitioner to comply the objections/deficiencies pointed out in letter dated 26.09.2008 within a period of two months from today. On such compliance, the petitioner has to submit a report to the first respondent. On submission of such report, the first respondent to consider the matter afresh and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible. Accordingly, letter dated 02.03.2009 is set aside and the writ petition is disposed of with the directions referred to above. No order as to costs”. In this case the Hon’ble Court in Para 5 has referred to earlier orders in “similar matters granting some time to the institutions to comply the deficiencies and directing the authority to consider the applications by applying the policy which was in existence at that time”. In this matter however, as per records it is not closed due to reason of being covered under change of policy by Government of Andhra Pradesh but due to non reply to deficiencies within stipulated time. The institution has waited for 3 years after issued of deficiency letter and 6 years after date of application for re-open the case.

The Committee considered the matter, decided to further process the application on submission of original application, and related supporting documents, within 60 days from the date of issue of letter.

Accordingly the institution has submitted its original application and related supporting documents on letter dated 09.05.2011 referring to the minutes of 203rd meeting of SRC, 31st March & 1st April,. 2011 from Website. Accordingly Inspection of the institution was conducted on 26.07.2011 & VT Report was received to the SRC-NCTE on 29.07.2011.

The management is running B.Ed course in the same building.

The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice for the following:

As per Affidavit submitted, it is not clear whether the land is on lease basis or ownership basis. As per NCTE norms, the land & building must be in the name of the institution/trust.

The land usage certificate (Dt. 29.12.2007) shows that, land usage certificate is issued only for Sy. No. 50/1D, but as per record, three survey Nos are mentioned i.e., 49,50 and 137 in the


143



building plan, Building completion certificate and land document. This discrepancy may be explained/clarified by the management.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be refused and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the refusal, based on the records available, with no further notice.

85 APS00508D.P.Ed

Sanjay D.P,Ed College, Bidar.

KA

Sanjay D.P.Ed College, Gunahalli Road, Shahapur Village, Pin-585401, Bidar District, Karnataka

Sanjay D.P.Ed College, Gunahalli Road, Shahapur Village, Bidar District-585401, Karnataka has submitted an application for seeking grant of recognition for offering D.P.Ed course on 23.12.1996.The application was processed and the institution was granted recognition on 21.8.2000.The State Government of Karnataka in its letter addressed to Ministry of HRD, Government of India, New Delhi and NCTE has recommended withdrawal of some institutions in the State of Karnataka as the institutions are lacking infrastructural, instructional facilities and staff.The matter was placed before SRC in its 134 th meeting of SRC held during 29th to 31st May and 1st June, 2007 has decided to cause inspection of the institutions recommended for withdrawal of recognition by State Government of Karnataka under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, inspection was carried out on 18.10.2007. The inspection report has received and placed SRC in its 161st meeting held on 6th and 7th August, 2007 considered the visiting report, VCD and other related documents and it has decided to issue show cause notice for the following deficiencies and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this show cause notice The Management has not responded to inspection team.The building in which the D.P.Ed course was functioning is closed.The D.P.Ed college is not functioning in the same address.The management running Nightingale Nursing School in the same building.Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to the institution on 26.8.2008.As the institution did not care to respond to the notice dated 26.8.2008, even after lapse of two and half years.Hence, the matter was placed before SRC in its 201st meeting held on 22nd

and 23rd February, 2011. The Committee considered the non-reply to the notice and it was decided to serve final show cause notice under section 17 of NCTE Act for the following;


144



The Management has not responded to inspection team.The building in which the D.P.Ed course was functioning is closed.The D.P.Ed college is not functioning in the same address.The management is running Nightingale Nursing School in the same building.Accordingly, final show cause notice was issued to the institution on 23.3.2011.The institution has submitted written representation on 11.4.2011, which was placed before SRC in its 204th meeting held on 27th and 28th April, 2011. The Committee considered written representation of the institution and decided to cause inspection under Section 17 of NCTE Act.Accordingly, inspection letter was issued to the institution on 22.7.2011 intimating the date of inspection.The inspection could not be carried out instead a letter dated 28.7.2011 has been submitted by the VT members stated as follows; “the members of the inspection team contacted over phone the management of Sanjay D.P.Ed college(APS00508), Bidar, KA communicating the schedule of visit to the college. In response, the management responded through SMS on 27.7.2011 that “the president of the college has been hospitalised for treatment of Kidkey dialysis. So postpone the inspection for two months.”A telegram dated 27.7.2011 has been received from the institution stated that the President of the college has been hospitalised and it has requested for postpone the inspection for two months.

The Committee considered the institution’s reply by telegram dt. 27.07.2011 on the above matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for the following reasons:-

The management has repeatedly requested for postponement of the inspection of the institution and non-response for four years to the show cause notice issued and for giving unsatisfactory/unconvincing reasons for repeated postponement of inspections.

The protracted non-response to the show cause notice and non-co-operation for the inspection by NCTE, go to prove that all is not well with the institution. Having given the adequate time/opportunity the NCTE, SRC has to withdraw the recognition.

Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the recognition of the D.P.Ed course run by the Sanjay D.P.Ed Gunahalli Road, , Shahapur Village, Pin-585401, Bidar District, Karnataka, from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.P.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.

But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any


145



further admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.



86 APS02299D.Ed

M.H. Ramaiah Teacher Training Institute, Kodagu.

KA

M.H. Ramaiah Teacher Training Institute, Masgodu, Coorg, Kodagu District, KarnatakaM.H. Ramaiah Teacher Training Instiutte, Somwarpet, Banavara Road, Masgodu, Coorg, Kodagu District, Karnataka has submitted an application for offering D.Ed course on 31.12.2003.The application was processed and the recognition was granted to the institution for offering D.Ed course with an intake of 50 students from the academic session 2004-2005 vide order no. F.SRO/NCTE/D.Ed/2004-2005/8634 dated 25.11.2004 with the condition to shift the premises into the own building within three years. The institution in its letter dated 19.11.2007 has submitted a proposal for shifting of premises along with Rs. 40,000/- towards shifting fee.Inspection was proposed to the institution during 27th and 30th December, 2010. The management has requested to postpone the inspection due to personal reasons vide letter dated 30.12.2010 and they have stated that the letter already submitted to SRC, NC TE on 28.12.2010. Hence, the inspection of the institution could not be carried out. The matter was placed before SRC in its 200th meeting held on 20th and 21st January, 2011 and the Committee decided to cause inspection under section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, inspection was fixed between 5th and 6th April, 2011 and communicated to institution as well as VT members. But inspection could not be conducted by VT.Hence, inspection was again fixed on 30th and 31st July, 2011. Accordingly, a letter was issued to the institution intimating the date of inspection between 30th and 31st July, 2011. The inspection could not be carried out instead a letter dated 30.7.2011 has been submitted by the VT members by enclosing a letter from the management requesting to postpone the inspection since, the Principal of the institute is hospitalised and undergone for Cardiac surgeries.

The Committee considered the institutions reply by telegram Dt. 27.07.2011 on the above matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for the following reasons:-

The management has repeatedly requested for postponement of the inspection of the institution. The first postponement on personal reasons vide the institution’s letter dt. 30.12.2010 and again in 30-


146



31st July 2011 when the VT was not allowed to inspect on the ground of ‘Principal”s hospitalization. The persistent non-co-operation of the institution goes to prove that all is not-well with the institution.

Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the recognition of the D.Ed course run by the M.H. Ramaiah Teacher Training Institute, Masgodu, Coorg, Kodagu District, Karnaataka, from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.




87 APS01119APS01155APS03637D.T.Ed-Al

B.Ed B.P.EdVivekananda Teacher Training Institute of colleges of Education, College of Physical Education for Women, Namakal.TN

Vivekanandha Teacher Training Institute and College of Education, College of Physical Education for Women, Unjanai Village, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District – 637 205, Tamilnadu.

Vivekanandha Teacher Training Institute and College of Education, College of Physical Education for Women, Unjanai Village, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District – 637 205, Tamilnadu submitted application for granted of recognition to D.T.Ed, B.Ed and B.P.Ed course.

The application was processed and recognition was granted for offering D.T.Ed course with an intake of 50 students on 09.09.2004 and additional intake of 50 on 25.08.2005 for D.T.Ed for B.Ed on 01.02.2005 and B.P.Ed on 18.10.2005 at Elayampalayam Post, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District – 637 205, Tamilnadu with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.

The institution vide letter dated 11.03.2008 submitted its proposal for shifting of premises alongwith Rs. 40,000/- for D.T.Ed, B.Ed and B.P.Ed course.

The institution is also granted recognition to M.Ed on 13.11.2006 and M.P.Ed on 02.01.2003.

Inspection was proposed to the institution during 30th May and 4th June 2011. The management has requested not to inspect due to started the course in permanent building vide letter dated. 04.08.2011. Hence, the


147



inspection of the institution could not conducted by the Visiting Team.

The report submitted by the VT is placed.

The SRC considered the letter of the institution and all other relevant documents by the institution and decided to cause composite inspection for all the courses at the premises Under Section 17 of NCTE Act, in Oct, 2011, the institution is directed to submit the following within 30 days of the receipt of the notice, duly filled in Questionnaire along with all the necessary documents for land, building approval and completion certificate from a competent Govt. Engineer and other relevant documents along with Demand Draft @ the rate of Rs.40,000/- inspection fee for each of the D.T.Ed-Al, B.Ed & B.P.Ed courses in favour of “The Member Secretary, NCTE” payable at Bangalore.

Consideration of the VTR under section 14/15 : ( Vol-5 )

Sl.No

CodeCourse


State

Remarks of SRC

88 APS09442

D.Ed

St. Mary’s

College of

Education,

Mahabub Nagar.

AP

St. Mary’s College of Education No.8-2-217, Padmavathy Colony, Mahabubnagar- 509 002 Andhra Pradesh managed by St. Mary’s Vidyalaya Educational Society, Mahabub nagar, Andhra PradeshSt. Mary’s Vidyalaya Educational Society, Mahabub nagar, Andhra Pradesh has submitted an application to the Southern Regional Committee of NCTE for grant of recognition to St. Mary’s College of Education No.8-2-217, Padmavathy Colony, Mahabubnagar- 509 002 Andhra Pradesh for D.Ed Course. The application was submitted on 20.12.2007, application submitted by the institution was processed and deficiency letter dt. 01.04.08 was issued to the institution for the following:

The affidavit submitted in not in the prescribed format.The building plan submitted is to be approved by the competent

Government AuthorityThe building plan submitted and the land documents submitted

does not match and survey numbers/ Plot numbers/ Places are different The Land usage certificate from the competent Government

authority is not submitted.Encumbrance certificate issued by competent Government


148



authority is not issued.Fixed deposit receipt of Rs.3.00 Lakhs submitted towards Reserve

fund is not from the Nationalized Bank. The Undertaking in prescribed format is not submitted.

The institution was given 90 days time to fulfill the deficiencies. The file has been closed as per MIS list but no closure order is found in the file.The institution has filed a court case vide Writ petition No. 8865 of 2011 in the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh verses NCTE-SRC, Principal Secretary, Govt. of Andhra Pradesh and The Director of School Education, Hyderabad as first, second and third respondents respectively. Hon’ble High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad after hearing the arguments of Advocate of Petitioner and directed to issue Show Cause Notice on 01.04.2011 to respondents herein to show cause as to why this WP should not be admitted in the circumstances set out in the petition and affidavit filed in the WP. Post after two weeks.Hon’ble High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad passed an order in WP 8865 of 2011 on 21.04.2011 as mentioned below”This WP is filed seeking a direction by way of Mamdus to declare the action of respondents in not considering the application of the petitioner society from grant of permission for running a D.Ed Course from the academic year 2011-12 as arbitrary and illegal.St Mary’s College of Education has submitted an application st.20.12.2007 seeking permission to run D.Ed Course. The application of the petitioner was processed and ultimately letter dt.01.04.2008 was issued to the college pointing out certain deficiencies. The grievance of the petitioner is that even though it is intending to comply with the objections and deficiencies pointed out by the respondents, the respondents are not acceding to the request of the petitioner.Learned Counsel for the petitioner relied on a judgment of this Court in the case of AP GIRIJANA SEVAKA SANGH vs National Council for Teacher Education and others, rendered in WP No. 6712 of 2009, Wherein a learned single judge of this Court has held that once an application is filed, it has to be considered with reference to the policy which was in force at the time when the application was made. He further contended that the respondents are not acceding to the request of the petitioner mainly on the ground of change in the policy, which is contrary to the aforesaid judgment on this court.As it is stated that the petitioner is yet to comply with the deficiencies pointed out in the letter dt. 01.04.2008. I deem it appropriate to dispose of the WP with a direction to the respondents to consider the request of the petitioner to start D.Ed Course as per policy. Which was in force at the time when the petitioner has applied for grant of permission to run the said course. Subject to the petitioner complying with the objections/ deficiencies pointed out by the respondents in the letter dt 01.04.2008Subject to the above directions, the W P is disposed of No costs


149



The Court order along with file placed before SRC for direction/ decision. Note: File is not closed for change of policy as seen from the records available. The Court orders is seeking to reopen the case which was closed for not adhering to time frame stipulated by NCTE Act / Regulation. In similar matters advocate has been requested to file appeals. As per decision of SRC in its 206th meeting the inspection was conducted on 26.07.2011.

The management is also running B.Ed in the same building.

The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14/15 of NCTE Act for the following:

The land is on Private Lease, which is not permissible as per NCTE norms. The land must be in the name of the institution/trust as per NCTE norms.

Non-encumbrance Certificate from the competent Government Authorised person / Authority is to be submitted.

Land Usage Certificate from the concerned Government authorities stating that the land is exclusively permitted/ sanctioned for Educational Purposes is to be submitted.

In building plan and building completion certificate, the Survey numbers are not tallying.

The Building plan and Building completion certificate have different Sy.Nos.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not refused thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the refusal, based on the records available, with no further notice.

89 APS04900D.Ed

St. Peters Institute of Elementary Teacher Education, Kurnool.

St. Peters Institute of Elementary Teacher Education, S.No. 715/1, Jutur Village, Pathikonda, Kurnool-518380, Andhra Pradesh.

An application was submitted by St. Peters Institute of Elementary Teacher Education, St. Peters Educational Society, Pathikonda, Kurnool-518380, Andhra Pradesh for grant of recognition to D.Ed course in the office of SRC –NCTE, Bangalore vide dated 28.12.2005 under NCTE notification dated 05.01.2004 dispensed with the requirement of NOC of the state


150



AP

Government from the institutions running B.Ed college and invited applications for D.Ed course from different institutions for grant of recognition to Elementary Teacher Education courses under Sarva Shikshana Abhiyan (SSA).While the application was under process and meanwhile, the Government of Andhra Pradesh of Hyderabad filed a Writ Petition No.22866 of 2005 in the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh of Hyderabad challenging the Notification of NCTE with regard to the dispensing with the requirement of NOC from the state Government. The W.P was allowed by the learned single judge with the directions that the rule excluding the state Government is bad. Against said judgment a Writ Appeal No.692 of 2006 was filed in the Division Bench of Hon’ble High Court of Hyderabad. Many discussions took place between the state Government of Andhra Pradesh and SRC-NCTE. However, neither state Government withdrew the case filed by them nor the stay has been vacated.Some institutions went to the court and filed WP individually, seeking directions for processing of their applications, in one of such WP No.8278 of 2008. The Hon’ble court decided that the applications of the institutions shall be processed as per the NCTE rules and regulations norms and standards existing as on date.As per the direction of Hon’ble Court and decision of SRC for processing of pending D.Ed application as per new regulation of NCTE in its 164th Meeting held on 20th September, 2008 meeting held on 20 th September 2008, the to process the applications.In view of the above decision, a deficiency letter was issued to the institution vide dated 27.08.2008.The institution submitted its reply on 08.12.2008 and the file was under process and in the meanwhile, in view of the recommendations of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh vide letter dated 07.01.2009 not to further recognize/permit the institutions for conducting B.Ed, D.Ed, Physical Education, Language Pandit course(s).SRC in its 169th Meeting held on 12-13th January, 2009 meeting held on 12-13th January, 2009 having considered the letter dated 07.01.2009 of State Government of Andhra Pradesh and decided to give effect to the decision of State Government of Andhra Pradesh as such, with immediate effect.A letter dated 07.02.2009 forwarded by Principal Secretary of Education requesting not to accord further recognition/permission to the new colleges/private B.Ed , D.Ed, Physical Education, Language Pandit course(s). in the state of Andhra Pradesh as the above colleges are exceeding in numbers than required.A letter dated 17th March, 2009 has been received from NCTE Hqrs informing that the “The recommendations of the Govt, of Andhra Pradesh not to grant recognition/permission in respect of other courses like B.Ed, D.Ed, Physical Education, Language Pandit course(s). have further been considered in NCTE and it has been decided that no further


151



recognition/permission to any institution in the state of Andhra Pradesh be considered by SRC for the academic session 2009-10 for B.Ed , D.Ed, and Physical Education courses also.The State Government vide its letter dated 20.03.2009 informed that it has been decided not to recommend the name of your institution.The letter dated 07.01.2009, 07.02.2009, 17.03.2009 and 20.03.2009 were considered by SRC in its 172nd meeting held on 25th –26th March 2009 and SRC decided to accept the recommendation of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh, not to grant recognition to any of the Teacher Institutions in the State of Andhra Pradesh for the year 2009-10 and decided to close the applications.Therefore, the application submitted by St. Peters Institute of Elementary Teacher Education, St.Peters Educational Society, Pathikonda, Kurnool-518380, Andhra Pradesh here by closed and order was issued on 29.04.2009.The institution ignored to approach Appellate Authority, NCTE Head Quarters and directly approached Hon’ble High Court in writ petition no 3888/2011 wherein the Hon’ble High court passed an order dated 21.02.2011 as under“It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondents that there is an adjudication by a learned single judge of this court in WP No.6712/2009, in which, directions were issued to consider the application of the applicant therein in accordance with the policy which existed on the date of presentation of the application.In that view of the matter, there shall be interim direction as prayed for”.The Committee in its 202nd meeting held on 14-15 March 2011 considered the matter and decided to call for clarification from the institution.

As per the decision of SRC a clarification letter was issued to the institution on 15.04.2011. Institution submitted its reply on 10.05.2011

As per perusal of the file the institution has submitted documents vide letters dated 10.05.2010.The committee in its 205th Meeting of SRC held on 18th & 19TH May, 2011 considered the written reply of the institution and decided to cause inspection of the institution in the permanent premises. Accordingly inspection of the institution was conducted on 24.07.2011 & VT Report was received to the SRC-NCTE on 28.07.2011.


The institution has submitted the registered land documents dt. 15.06.2006, after submission of the application Dt. 28.12.2005, which is against the NCTE regulations. As per the


152



regulations, the institution should be in possession of land on the date of application.


From VCD, it is seen that full view of the frontage of the building is not shown.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not refused and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the refusal, based on the records available, with no further notice.

90 APS02555D.Ed

Gayathri College of Elementary Teacher Education, Mahabubnagar.

AP

Gayathri College of Elementary Teacher Education, Mahabubnagar, Andhra Pradesh. Course – D.Ed

An application was submitted by Gayathri Educational Society, Mahabubnagar District, Andhra Pradesh for grant of recognition to D.Ed course in the office of SRC-NCTE, vide dated 03.02.2004 .The file was under process and in the meanwhile, in view of the recommendations of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh vide letter dated 07.01.2009 not to further recognise/permit the institutions for conducting B.Ed, D.Ed, Physical Education, Language Pandit course(s).The SRC in its 169th Meeting held on 12-13 January, 2009 having considered the letter dated 07.01.2009 of State Government of Andhra Pradesh and decided to give effect to the above decision of State Government of Andhra Pradesh as such, with immediate effect.A letter dated 07.02.2009 forwarded by Principal Secretary of Education requesting not to accord further recognition/permission to the new colleges/private B.Ed, D.Ed, Physical Education, Language Pandit in the State of Andhra Pradesh as the above colleges are exceeding in numbers than required.A letter dated 17.03.2009 has been received from NCTE, Hqrs informing that the “The recommendations of the Govt. of Andhra Pradesh not to grant recognition/permission in respect of other courses like B.Ed, D.Ed and Physical Education courses have further been decided that no further Recognition/ Permission to any institution in the State of Andhra Pradesh be considered by SRC for the academic session 2009-2010 for B.Ed, D.Ed, and Physical Education courses also”.The State Government vide its letter dated 20.03.2009 informed that it has been decided not to recommend the name of this institution. The letters dated 07.01.2009, 07.02.2009, 17.03.2009 and 20.03.2009 was considered by SRC in its 172nd Meeting held on 25-26 March, 2009 and


153



SRC decided to accept the recommendation of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh, not to grant recognition to any of the Teacher Training Institutions in the State of Andhra Pradesh for the year 2009-2010 and decided to close the applications.As per the decision of SRC the application was closed on 29.04.2009The Institute has approaching to Hon’ble High Court in W.P.No.28641 of 2010 without approached to appellate authority. Now, the Hon’ble High Court has passed an order on 19.11.2010 vide W.P.No.28641 of 2010 reads as hereunder:“It may be true that the State Government as well as the first respondent have reviewed the situation as to the necessary or otherwise of according permission to establish new colleges of education in the State in future and that the existing institutions are found to be adequate. However, the right that is accrued to the petitioners on the basis of their application and the consideration thereof by the first respondent cannot be taken away on account of the change of policy. It is settled principle of law that whenever an application is made, it must be considered and processed in accordance with the provisions of law that existed as on the date of presentation. Subsequent changes may apply to the applications that are made thereafter. Hence, the writ petition is also disposed of reiterating the same directions as noticed supra. No costs.” The institution was caused inspection by SRC on 29.04.2005. A deficiency letter dated 01.10.2008 was also issued and the institution replied on 20.01.2009. Again a letter dated 09.01.2009 to institution was issued for submitting the following documents, which were submitted on 28.01.2009.

1. Affidavit dated 21.09.20092. Copy of Building Completion certificate (26,000 Sq.ft signed by

Government Engineer) for S.No. 261/2 Tadiparthy, Andhra Pradesh.

3. Copy of Land usage certificate from Tasildhar

Apart from this the institution has submitted photo copies of FDR’s of Rs.5 lakhs and Rs.3 lakhs.In the mean while, in view of the recommendations of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh vide letter dated 07.01.2009 not to further recognize/permit the institutions for conducting B.Ed, D.Ed, Physical Education, Language Pandit course(s) SRC decided to close the file vide order dated 29.04.2009. The SRC in its 199th meeting held on 22-23 December 2010 considered the Hon’ble court orders and all the relevant documents by the institution and decided to cause inspection at the premises as the earlier visit was more than five year old dated 29.4.2005.The institution was directed to submit , all the necessary documents for land, building approval and completion certificate from a competent Govt. Engineer and other relevant


154



documents along with Demand Draft of Rs.40,000/- inspection fee towards the B.Ed course in favour of “The Member Secretary, NCTE” payable at Bangalore, for due consideration and necessary orders. The inspection was conducted on 10.02.2011. The management is running B.Ed course in the same building/premises.SRC in its 201st meeting held on 22-23 of February, 2011 considered the VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to issue show cause notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution seeking clarification on 23.03.2011. The institution has submitted its written representation on 20.04.2011.The committee considered the VT report, written reply of the institution vide letter dt. 20.04.2011 and decided to cause re-inspection of the institution on submission of all relevant documents and in anticipation of payment of Rs. 40000/- towards re-inspection fee. The institution has submitted DD of Rs. 4,0000/- vide letter dated 18.07.2011. Accordingly Inspection of the institution was conducted on 25.07.2011 & VT Report was received to the SRC-NCTE on 28.07.2011.

The management is also running B.Ed programme in the same building.



The size of the multipurpose hall is inadequate and is not as per NCTE norms.

Language learning lab needs to be strengthened.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not refused and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the refusal, based on the records available, with no further notice.

91 APS02777D.Ed

Pragathi D.Ed College, Ranga Reddy.

Pragathi D.Ed College, Annojiguda, NTPC Road, Ghatkesar (Mandal),Ranga Reddy, Andhra Pradesh

An application was submitted by Pragathi D.Ed. College, Annojiguda, NTPC Road, Ghatkesar(Mandal), Ranga Reddy, Andhra Pradesh, for grant of recognition to D.Ed course in the office of SRC-NCTE, Bangalore vide letter


155



APdated 03.02.2004. NCTE notification dated 05.01.2004 dispensed with the requirement of NOC of the state Government from the institutions running B.Ed college and invited applications for D.Ed course from different institutions for grant of recognition to Elementary Teacher Education courses under Sarva Shikshana Abhiyan (SSA).The application was under process and meanwhile, the government of Andhra Pradesh of Hyderabad filed a Writ Petition No 22866 of 2005 in the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh of Hyderabad challenging the notification of NCTE with regard to the dispensing with the requirement of NOC from the State Government. The Writ petition was allowed by the learned single judge with the directions that the rule excluding the state Government is bad. Against said judgement a Writ Appeal No.692 of 2006 was filed in the Division Bench of Hon’ble High Court of Hyderabad. Many discussions took place between the state Government of Andhra Pradesh and SRC-NCTE. However, neither state Government withdrew the case filed by them nor the stay was vacated.Some institutions went to the court and filed writ petitions individually, seeking directions for processing of their applications, in one of such Writ Petition No.8278 of 2008. The Hon’ble High Court decided that the applications of the institutions shall be processed as per the NCTE rules and regulations norms and standards existing as on date.As per the direction of Hon’ble High Court and decision of SRC for processing of pending D.Ed application as per new regulation as per new regulation of NCTE in its 164th Meeting held on 20th September, 2008 meeting held on 20th September 2008, the SRC started to process the applications.In view of the above decision, a deficiency letter was issued to the institution vide dated 03.11.2008.The institution submitted its reply on 03.02.2009 and the file was under process and in the meanwhile, in view of the recommendations of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh vide letter dated 07.01.2009 not to further recognize/permit the institutions for conducting B.Ed, D.Ed, Physical Education, Language Pandit course(s).SRC in its 169th Meeting held on 12-13th January, 2009 meeting held on 12-13th January, 2009 having considered the letter dated 07.01.2009 of State Government of Andhra Pradesh and decided to give effect to the decision of State Government of Andhra Pradesh as such, with immediate effect.

A letter dated 07.02.2009 forwarded by Principal Secretary of Education requesting not to accord further recognition/permission to the new colleges/private B.Ed, D.Ed, Physical Education, Language Pandit in the state of Andhra Pradesh as the above college are exceeding in numbers than required.A letter dated 17th March, 2009 has been received FROM NCTE Hqrs informing that the “The recommendations of the Govt. of Andhra Pradesh


156



not to grant recognition/Permission in respect of other courses like B.Ed, D.Ed and Physical Education courses have further been considered in NCTE and it has been decided that no further recognition/permission to any institution in the state of Andhra Pradesh be considered by SRC for the academic session 2009-10 for B.Ed, D.Ed and Physical Education Courses also”.The state Government vide its letter dated 20.03.2009 informed that it has been decided not to recommend the name of your institution.The letters dated 07.01.2009, 07.02.2009, 17.03.2009 and 20.03.2009 were considered by SRC in its 172nd meeting held on 25th –26th March 2009 and SRC decided to accept the recommendation of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh, not to grant recognition to any of the Teacher Training Institutions in the State of Andhra Pradesh for the year 2009-2010 and decided to close the applications.Therefore the application submitted by Pragathi D.Ed. College, Annojiguda, NTPCRoad, Ghatkesar(Mandal), Ranga Reddy, Andhra Pradesh was closed, vide letter dated 03.12.2010 the institution requested to consider granting approval on the basis of SCERT & State Government remarks for the academic year 2011-12. The institution was advised to prefer appeal against SRC order.The institution ignored to approach Appellate Authority, NCTE Head Quarters and directly approached Hon’ble High Court in writ petition no 2106/2011 wherein the Hon’ble High court passed an order as under“In that view of the matter, having regard to the fact that the application of the first petitioner society is also prior to the present policy notified by the Government and the respondents considered such application applying the present policy of the Government, order bearing No.F.SRO/NCTE/2008-09/12128, dated 29.04.2009, rejecting the request of the first petitioner society to run D.Ed College, is set aside and the respondents are directed to reconsider the application of the first petitioner society with reference to the policy, which was in force, during relevant year, when the application was initially submitted by it, and take steps accordingly, for grant of permission as prayed for”.The committee in its 202nd meeting considered the matter and decided to obtain all the relevant documents as per the norms including the valid building completion certificate, for consideration as per the Court orders.As per the decision of SRC, a letter was issued to the institution on 18.04.2011The institution submitted its reply on 24.04.2011 stating that relevant documents already submitted on 11.03.2011.

The committee in its 206th meeting of SRC held on 09.06.2010 considered the reply of the institution dt. 24.04.2011, and decided to cause composite inspection of the institution. Accordingly Inspection of the institution was conducted on 25.07.2011 & VT Report was received to the SRC-NCTE on 28.07.2011.


157



The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14/15 of NCTE Act for the following :



FDRs for Rs. 5 lacs and 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve fund respectively from Nationalised Bank is to be submitted.


92 SRCAPP39B.Ed

Chaithanya Education Institution, Kodagu.

KA

Chaithanya Education Institution, Kudlur, Kushalanagar, Kodagu District, KarnatakaChaithanya Educational Institution, 65/2, Kudloor, Kushalnagar, Somwarpet, Kodagu district, Karnataka has submitted an application for seeking grant of recognition for B.Ed course on 6.11.2009.Application was processed and the deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 22.12.2009. The institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 29.1.2010. The SRC in its 190th meeting held on March, 29th and 30th

2010 considered the written representation and decided to reject the application. Accordingly, a refusal order was issued to the institution on 4.5.2010.Aggrieved by the refusal order of SRC, the institution preferred an appeal to the NCTE-Hqrs., and the appellate authority in its order dated 15.9.2010. The SRC in its 197th meeting held on 13th and 14th October, 2010 considered the appellate authority order and decided to process the application on merits. Accordingly, application has been processed and deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 10.1.2011. The institution has submitted its written representation on 8.2.2011.The SRC considered the reply to deficiency letter in its 201st meeting held on 22nd and 23rd meeting held on 22nd and 23rd February, 2011 and decided to cause inspection and also decided to follow up the deficiencies, if any.As per the decision of SRC, the inspection of the institution was fixed on 5th

and 6th April, 2011, in this regard, a letter was issued on 23.3.2011. But inspection could not be conducted by VT.Hence, inspection was again fixed on 30th and 31st July, 2011. Accordingly,


158



a letter was issued to the institution intimating the date of inspection between 30th and 31st July, 2011. The visiting team members proceeded for inspection 30.7.2011 and the institute was not allowed to inspect the institution. The VT remarks is as follows;“The NCTE VT members Dr. Anuradha, Assistant Professor and Dr. R. Gopal, Lecturer visited the Chaithanya Educational Institution, Kudlur, Kushalanagar, Kodagu District, Karnataka on 30.7.2011 at 3.00 pm. Inspite of our instructions, to stay back for a confirmation, neither the management nor the teaching faculty were present. The Committee members waited till 3.45 pm., no one turned up, inspite of the watchman calling the management team continuously. The phone no. was switched off, when we made an attempt to call. The letter of postponement of inspection was handed over by the watchman of the institute”.The institution in its letter stated that the building construction work is going on hence, it is requested for one month time.


As per the decision of SRC, the inspection of the institution was fixed first on fifth & sixth of April, 2011, the inspection could not be conducted by the VT members. Again, it was fixed on 30th & 31st July, 2011, accordingly letter was issued to the institution about the date of inspection and VT members proceeded to the institution for inspection on 30.7.2011, but the VT members were not allowed by the institution for inspection. No member/representative of the institution were present at the institution. The VT members waited till 3.45 P.M. no one turned up, inspite of the watchman calling the management team continuously. The phone was switched off, and the VT members tried to contact the representative of the management but in vain. At last a letter was handed over to the VT members requesting for postponement of the inspection as the building is still under construction. This shows that the management has not taken any suitable steps to construct the building in time, since the making of application Dt. 6.11.2009.

The management has admitted itself that the building is not yet ready and still it is under construction.

As per NCTE norms, regulations, the building must be ready at the time of submitting application for recognition of teacher education programme.


159



In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not refused thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the refusal, based on the records available, with no further notice.

93 APS01459D.T.Ed

Sri Kuvempu D.Ed College,

HassanKarnataka

Sri Kuvempu D.Ed College, Hassan – 573201, KarnatakaSri Kuvempu D.Ed College, Buvanahally, Hassan – 573201, Karnataka. The institution was granted recognition for offering D.Ed

course vide order dated 28.01.2005 with an intake of 50 students

In the mean time NCTE, Hqrs vide its letter dated 09 th August, 2011 has

forwarded a copy of the inspection report dated 30.06.2010 conducted

Under Section 13 of NCTE Act. The deficiencies observed from the

inspection report were communicated to the institution vide this letters No.

13-8/2010/NCTE/Sec.13/Insp/Kar-53/ A 29470 dated 29.12.2010 & No.

13-8/2010/NCTE/Sec13/Insp/Kar-53/A34804 dated 31.03.2011, which was

replied to by the institution vide its letters dated 15.02.2011 & 23.06.2011.

Keeping all the facts in view it has been decided that SRC, NCTE may

look into the matter to ascertain the adherence of relevant NCTE Norms &

Standards by the institution and requested to take appropriate action in the

matter expeditiously under intimation to this office.


The total built up area for D.Ed course is only 11097.08 sq.ft. which is inadequate as per NCTE norms. 16000 sq.ft of built up area is required for D.T.Ed course as per NCTE norms.

The land details such as Survey numbers, Kata numbers etc., are not legible/mentioned in the building plan. The approved building plan with all the details is to be submitted.

The land area mentioned in the building plan and building completion certificate are contradictory to each other. The


160



contract agreement submitted by the institution pertains to the land located at Sy.No. 10/14 measuring 7686 sq.ft.(approx) only. The land area is grossly inadequate as per NCTE norms.

The building plan mentions one more Sy.No.33/9, but no supporting land documents are submitted by the institution.

Consolidated salary is being paid to staff members by cash and not as per Central Government norms, through bank.

CPF/PPF facility is not provided to the staff.


MISC. Cases : ( Vol-6 )

Sl.No

CodeCourse


State

Remarks of SRC

94 APS08092 /

APS05169

D.T.Ed / D.T.Ed-AI

A.R.R. Teacher

Training Institute for

Women, Thanjavur.

TN

A.R.R, Teacher Training Institute for Women, No. 8, North Side, Vaikolkattukara Street, Melacauvery, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District, Tamilnadu.

A.R.R, Teacher Training Institute for Women, No. 8, North Side, Vaikolkattukara Street, Melacauvery, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District, Tamilnadu submitted application for D.T.Ed on 09.12.2005 The institution was granted recognition on 02.09.2006. Further, the institution has submitted application for D.T.Ed-AI on 02.01.2007. The institution was grated recognition on 07.12.2007 with an additional intake of 50 students, thus making an annual intake of 100 students, which includes the existing intake of 50 and additional intake of 50 students, with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.


161



The institution in its letter dated17.08.2011 stated that the sum of Rs. 16 lakhs have been deposited in jointly with SRC NCTE Bangalore towards Endowment Fund and Reserve Fund for the running of A.R.R. Teacher Training Institute for Women and for the additional intake.

The institution has requested to close the institute from 2012-13 due to non response from the students for admission during the current academic session. The institute will be continued to run during 2011-2012 for the II year students those who were admitted during 2010-2012. The institution has further requested to grant permission to withdraw the deposit as the institute is going to be closed.

In view of the above the institution has requested to withdraw the recognition granted to the institution for D.T.Ed and D.T.Ed-AI from the academic session 2012-13.

The Committee considered the Institutions request for closure of D.T.Ed (APS08092) course and decided to permit the closure by withdrawing the recognition for (APS08092) D.T.Ed course with effect from 2013-2014, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.T.Ed, course, if any, to complete their final year course.



Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.

95 APS03223 D.T.Ed / D.T.Ed-AI

A.R.R. Teacher Training Institute, Thanjavur.

A.R.R, Teacher Training Institute, 153, A.R.Ramasami Road, A.R.R. Matriculation Higher Sec. School Campus, Kumbakonam-612001, Thanjavur District, Tamilnadu.

A.R.R, Teacher Training Institute, 153, A.R.Ramasami Road, A.R.R. Matriculation Higher Sec. School Campus, Kumbakonam-612001, Thanjavur District, Tamilnadu submitted application for D.T.Ed-AI on 30.12.2004. The institution was granted recognition on 03.09.2005 with on annual intake of 100 students, which includes existing intake of 50 students.

The institution in its letter dated. 01.08.2011 stated that the strength of students began to fall for the past 2 or 3 years due to the opening of more institutes surrounding the place. Due to lack of employment opportunities to the Secondary Grade Trained Teachers the response among the public to this training is decreasing. The management has run the institute with great financial problems for the past 3 years assuming that the enrollment of


162



students may be increased in future.

The institution has further stated that, this year also no one is prepared to be admitted under management quota till to date. The DTERT has allotted only 13 candidates under single window system against the full strength of 50 students. Out of 13 candicates alloteed 4 or 5 candidates came forward for admission and no response from the remaining students.

Hence, the management has decided to close the A.R.R. Teacher Training Institute (Co-Ed.,) from the academic session 2012-13 to avoid further heavy loss. The institute will function during the year 2011-12 for imparting education to the students admitted during 2010-2011.

Therefore, the institution has requested to withdraw the recognition granted to the institution for D.T.Ed and D.T.Ed-AI from the academic session 2012-13.

The Committee considered the Institutions request for closure of D.T.Ed-Al (APS05169) course and decided to permit the closure by withdrawing the recognition for (APS05169) D.T.Ed-Al course with effect from 2013-2014, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.T.Ed-Al course, if any, to complete their final year course.




96 APS00889D.T.Ed / D.T.Ed-AI

B.T.K. Teacher Training Institute, Pudukkottai.

TN

B.T.K.Teacher Training Institute, Manapparai Road, Opp. E.B. Office, Viralimalai, Pudukkottai District – 621 316, Tamilnadu

B.T.K.Teacher Training Institute, Manapparai Road, Opp. E.B. Office, Viralimalai, Pudukkottai District – 621 316, Tamilnadu submitted application for D.T.Ed-AI on 03.09.2005. The institution was granted recognition on 31.12.2005 with on annual intake of 100 students, which includes existing intake of 50 students.

The institution in its letter dated. 29.07.2011 stated that the during the last couple of years the strength of admission had gone down drastically in D.T.Ed., Courses. Hence the Board of Trustees of B.T.K. Educational Development Trust, which is running the B.T.K. Teacher Training Institute, had unanimously resolved to close down the Teacher Training Institute.

Hence, the institution has requested to close the application by withdrawing the recognition


163



The Committee considered the Institutions request for closure of D.T.Ed (APS00889) & D.T.Ed-Al course (intake of 100 including additional intake) and decided to permit the closure by withdrawing the recognition for (APS00889) D.T.Ed & D.T.Ed-Al course with effect from 2013-2014, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.T.Ed & D.T.Ed-Al course, if any, to complete their final year course.




97 APS04935D.T.Ed / D.T.Ed-AI

Sarada Ramakrishna Institute of Teacher Training, Thiruvannamalai.

TN

Sarada Ramakrishna Institute of Teacher Training, Birudur-604408, Vandavasi Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District, Tamilnadu.

Sarada Ramakrishna Institute of Teacher Training, Birudur-604408, Vandavasi Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District, Tamilnadu submitted application for D.T.Ed-AI on 02.12.2005. The institution was granted recognition on 06.10.2006 with on annual intake of 100 students, which includes existing intake of 50 students.

The institution in its letter dated. 03.08.2011 stated that they are unable to admit all the 100 seats as per approval, since non availability of students in their area. More over students are also not interested in studying Teacher Training Course at present due to non availability of Job. The institution has admitted less than 50 students for the last academic year 2010-2011 and has requested to withdraw recognition of additional intake of 50 students.

Hence, the management has decided to close the institution and has requested to cancel the recognition granted to the institution for D.T.Ed-AI course only (one unit of D.Ed) from the academic session 2011-2012.

The Committee considered the Institutions request for closure of D.T.Ed-Al course and decided to permit the closure by withdrawing the recognition for D.T.Ed-Al (APS04935) Course with effect from 2013-2014, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.T.Ed-Al (APS04935) course, if any, to complete their final year course.




164




98 APS07587D.T.Ed

Annai Mariam Teacher Training Institute, Thanjavur.

TN

Annai Mariam Teacher Training Institute, Anakudi Road, Kovilacheri, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur-612503, Tamilnadu

Annai Mariam Teacher Training Institute, Anakudi Road, Kovilacheri, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur-612503, Tamilnadu submitted application for D.T.Ed., on 17.10.2006. The institution was granted recognition on 11.12.2007 with an annual intake of 50 students.

The institution in its letter dated. 09.08.2011 stated that the Tamilnadu State Government has not granted affiliation to the institution. The management decided to close the programme based on personal interest. Hence, the management has decided to close the institution and has requested to cancel the recognition granted to the institution for D.T.Ed.

The Committee considered the Institutions request for closure of D.T.Ed (APS07587) course and decided to permit the closure by withdrawing the recognition for (APS07587) D.T.Ed course with effect from 2013-2014, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.T.Ed course, if any, to complete their final year course.




99 APS07396B.Ed

Shobha Memorial Education College of Jaimi, Vizianagaram.

AP

Shobha Memorial Educational Society, Vizianagaram District, Andhra PradeshShobha Memorial Educational Society, Vizianagaram District, Andhra Pradesh had submitted an application for grant of recognition for B.Ed course on 25.07.2006. The application was processed and was considered by the Committee in its various meetings and the institution was refused recognition due to lack of infrastructural and instructional facilities. Accordingly, a refusal order was issued to the institution on 29.11.2007.

Aggrieved by the refusal order, the institution preferred an appeal to NCTE-Hqrs. The Appellate Authority vide its order dated 20.6.2008 reverses the order appealed against. In obedience to the Appellate Authority order, a Conditional Recognition letter was issued to the institution on 30.7.2008.

A Complaint was received by the SRC against the institution alleging the lack of infrastructural facilities, which was placed before SRC. The Southern


165



Regional Committee considered the complaint, inspection reports of Section 17 of NCTE Act, Notice was issued and a reply was received from institution.

The Committee after considering various aspects in respect of deficiencies, location of College closer to quary mining and disturbances to the academic ambience of the College, arrived at the conclusion that the Conditional Recognition /LOI issued to the institution be withdrawn for the following reasons:-

1. The quary mining is located adjacent to the College premises. It is a disturbance to the academic ambience of the institution. The Management’s written representation to the showcause Notice is not convincing.

1. The built up space as per showcause Notice and Section 17 inspection report is less than the requirement as per norms and standards of B.Ed. course. The Management in its representation simply stated that 17,813 sq.ft. built up space available but failed to submit the approved building plan and building completion certificate issued by the Government authority as an evidence.

2. No proof is given in respect of modification of two rooms and to provide more space to Seminar Hall.

Accordingly, a Withdrawal Order was issued to the institution on 09.04.2009. Aggrieved by the withdrawal order, the institution preferred an appeal to NCTE-Hqrs. The Appellate Authority vide order dated 07.08.2009 reversed the order appealed against.

In obedience to the Appellate Authority order, a Conditional Recognition letter was issued to the institution on 01.09.2009. The institution submitted its written representation on 15.09.2009 which was considered by SRC in its meeting held on 22nd September 2009 and a formal recognition was issued to the institution on 14.10.2009.

Meanwhile, another Complaint was received from Ippaka Ramachandrudu, Vizianagaram, Andhra Pradesh which was considered by the Committee and a letter was issued to the institution on 22.02.2010 to give comments on the compliant. The reply is awaited from the institution.Again, the same Complainant has submitted another complaint on 6.4.2010 stating that the Management is collecting amounts from the Private Colleges for getting admissions in their College and that there are no materials in the labs. of the College.The Committee considered the brief note about the College and also the complaints received against the institution and has decided to issue Final Notice to the institution based on the complaint. As per the decision of SRC Final Notice was issued to the institution on 14.05.2010. A letter was sent also to the institution on 09.08.2010 with request to send


166



translation in English version from local language. However the same is awaited.The complainant i.e. I.Rama Chandrudu has sent a complaint letter along with enquiry report of Regional Inspection Officer, Board of Intermediate Education, Vizianagaram, Andhra Pradesh (Copy enclosed) The committee in its 196th meeting held on 15th –16th September 2010 considered the complaint and noted the contents, and await the reply from the institution.In reply to our letters dated 09.08.2010 & 13.09.2010 Institution submitted translated documents on 27.09.2010. A Compliant was forwarded from NCTE Hq received from Sri.I.Ramachandrudu, Hyderabad through Addl. Director General of Police, CID, Andhra Pradesh and directed to look into facts of the complaint and place it before the Regional Committee in the ensuring meeting for necessary action under section 17 of NCTE Act, 1993. The committee decided in its 200 meeting of SRC to send a detailed position-report to the Head Quarters, NCTE for necessary action. As per direction of SRC detailed position- report was sent to NCTE HQ on 02.03.2011. After that Fax letter dated 1st July, 2011 received in the office of SRC from NCTE HQ with direction to send the details of VT members. Hence SRC office issued a letter to NCTE HQ on 02.07.2011. Recently a letter received from NCTE Htrs vide letter no. F.39-3929)/2010/CDN/A40739 dated 3rd Aug, 2011 in the office of SRC on 11.08.2011 where in NCTE has directed to take steps to address the issue raised in the complaint and to reply on the action taken to DGP, CID, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad immediately with an intimation to the NCTE Hqtrs on action taken.

The SRC decided to cause inspection of the institution Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Further, the committee decided to keep all the previous VT members out of the Inspection Panel, during the pendency of inspection and final decision in the matter.

100 ------

Praveen College of Education, Prakasam.

AP

Comp Praveen Educational Society & V.C. Venkata Reddy Educational Society, Andhra Pradesh.

Complaint against Praveen Educational Society, Gandhi Street, Bestavarapeta, (Post and Mandal), Prakasam Distt, Andhara Pradesh & Venna Chinna .Venkata Reddy Educational Society, Jawahar Nagar Coloney, Markapur- 523316, Prakashan Distt, Andhra Pradesh for submitting fake fix deposit receipts.

List of the institution who have submitted fake FDRs.

1. Praveen College of Education, Bestawaripet Post & Mandal, Prakasam


167



Distt- 523334, Andhara pradesh managed by Praveen Educational Society, Bestawaripet Post & Mandal, Prakasam Distt- 523334, Andhara pradesh. (Code No. – APS07307). Course- B.Ed. PH.No. 08406-237308/09849201808.

2. Praveen HPT College, Gandhi Bazar, Bestavarapeta, Prakasam Distt- 523334, Andhara Pradesh managed by Praveen Educational Society, Bestavaripeta (P&M) Prakasam Distt. Andhara pradesh. (Code No. – APS05679). Course- H.T.P. PH No.08406-237308.

3. Ravi Teja college of Education, Viswasanthi (H) School, Jawahar Nagar, Colony, Markapur- 523316, Prakasam District, Andhara Pradesh managed by Venna Chinna .Venkata Reddy Educational Society, Jawahar Nagar Coloney, Markapur- 523316, Prakashan Distt, Andhra Pradesh. (Code No. – APS02654). Course- B.Ed. PH.No-08596-226799/09849201808.

4. Coramandal College of Education, D.No. 4-5-82/1, 5th lane, koritapadu, Guntur Distt, Andhara Pradesh, managed by Praveen Educational Society, D.No. 4-5-82/1, 5th lane, koritapadu, Guntur Distt, Andhara Pradesh. (Code No. – APS07345). Course- B.Ed. PH.No. 09849201808/09885486870.

With reference as above court order dated 08.03.2011 in writ petition no. 15371,15372 and 15373 in the matter of Coraomandal College of Educaition, Medikonduru Post and Mandal Guntur Distt, Ravi Teja College of Education, Jawaharnagar Coloney Markapur, Post and Mandal, Prakasam Distt and Praveen College of Educationhave been received in the office of SRC on 17.03.2011 alongwith draft of 50,000/- +50,000/-+50,000/- total 1,50,000/-.

The Hon’ble High court has passed common order in writ petition no. 15371,15372 and 15373 as under:-

“It is no doubt true that the F.D Rs furnished by the Petitioners were found to be not genuine. No other violation on the part of the petitioners is pointed out. The FDRs are to be kept with the council to meet the unforeseen developments in case the institutions are stopped abruptly. The petitioners appear to have not taken proper care while furnishing the F.Drs. Once the genuine F.Drs. are furnished along with explanation, the council ought to have taken a pragmatic view, duly imposing penalty, if any, upon the petitioners. Apart from the interests of the petitioners, the career of students is also involved. Further, the existence of the institution at a particular place would ensure proper training to the person in the locality.

This court is of the view that ends of justice would be met, if penalty of Rs. 50,000/- each is levied upon the petitioners for restoration of the approval.

Hence, the writ petition is allowed and the orders passed by the council withdrawing the approval are set aside, on condition that the petitioners shall pay a sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) each


168



towards penalty to the council, within four weeks from today. There shall be no order as to costs.

However the certified copy of order not received in the office of SRC. Hence we can send a letter to our advocate with request to send writ petition alongwith certified copy of the order and also send a letter to NCTE Hqtrs for guidance.

The committee decided to arrange to file an Appeal against the orders of Hon’ble High Court of Hyderabad immediately and Action be taken without waiting for confirmation of minutes.

Further, the committee decided to send a reminder letter to NCTE Hqrts seeking guidance and further action in the matter.

101 ------

Post facto recognition for DPE(Diploma in Primary Education) distance mode, MANUU.

AP

Post facto recognition for DPE (Diploma in Primary Education) distance mode, offered by Directorate of Distance Education, MANUU.

A letter has been received in the office of SRC on 17-08-2011 regarding post facto recognition for DPE (Diploma in Primary Education) distance mode, offered by Directorate of Distance Education, MANUU.

In this letter aforesaid University has given genuine as under:-

Maulana Azad National Urdu University, Hyderabad, is a central dual mode University established by ab act of Parliament in 1998. It was awarded Grade “A” by NAAC and was ranked All India 6th in 2010 and 2011 after an All India survey conducted by the Outlook Group and published in August, 2010 and August, 2011 issues of Careers 360.This letter is to inform you that the Directorate of Distance Education (DDE) of MANUU had launched a one year Diploma programme: Diploma in Primary Education (DPE) under an MoC with IGNOU in the year 2006-07. The total number of 408 students had enrolled in this programme. The programme was subsequently not continued in the following years.

As the DPE programme was launched under an MoC with IGNOU, The officials at DDE were given to understand that no separate recognition from NCTE Was needed to launch the DPE programme by DDE, MANUU as IGNOU already had the recognition. Hence, the programme was run for one batch.

Hence, in some regions, the DPE certificate issued by MANUU to the successful candidates is not being considered valid as it does not have NCTE recognition.


169



In the light of the above, I request you to consider the case of recognition for DPE programme (2006-07) and grant post- facto approval for the same.

Note: NCTE Regulations does not specify any norms for this course.

The committee considered the request of the University and it was decided that, as per NCTE Regulations, norms and Act, there is no provision for considering post facto recognition to any of the Teacher Education Programme. Accordingly, the committee decided to inform the University about the same.

102 APS00383TTC – AL

Malabar Teacher Training Institute,

Pallikkunnu,KannurKerala

Malabar Teacher Training Institute, Near A.K.G. Hospital, P.O. Pallikkunnu, Pin – 670 004, Kannur District, Kerala.

Malabar Teacher Training Institute, Near A.K.G. Hospital, P.O. Pallikkunnu, Pin – 670 004, Kannur District, Kerala has submitted application for TTC Additional intake course on 01.09.2004. The institution has been granted recognition vide order dated 24.09.2005 with an intake of 50 students from the academic session 2005-2006 with an annual intake of 100 students which includes the existing intake of 50 and an additional intake of 50 with the condition to shift to its own premises within 3 years from the date of recognition.

The institution in its letter received on 19.08.2011 stated that though the institution was permitted 100 students, it is experienced that the intake was less than the sanctioned strength for all these years and in 2010-11 the institution had only one batch of students. Thus the institution has intent to run only one batch in future i.e. 2011-12 onwards. Further, the institution has also stated that the demand for TTC dropped heavily and as such, the institution has requested to curtail the sanction of 100 students to 50 students.

Further, the institution has requested to refund the FDR of Rs.8.00 lakhs out of Rs.16 lakhs which was kept towards Endowment and Reserve fund by withdrawing the recognition of additional intake.

The Committee considered the Institution’s request for closure of TTC-Al (APS00383)course and decided to permit the closure of additional intake by withdrawing the recognition for (APS00383)TTC-Al course with effect from 2013-2014, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in TTC-Al course, if any, to complete their final year course.




170




103 APS03630B.Ed

Amman College of Education, Dindigul District, Tamilnadu

AMMAN COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, DINGIGUL DISTRICT, TAMILNADU

Amman College of Education, Dindigul – 624002, Tamilnadu has submitted an application in the name and style of Amman College of Education, Pillaiyarnatham, Pithalaipatty (Po), Dindigul – 624002, Tamilnadu for seeking grant of recognition for B..Ed course on 30.12.2004.

Recognition was granted for offering B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students on 04.01.2006 at, Amman College of Education, Pillaiyarnatham, Pithalaipatty (Po), Dindigul – 624002, Tamilnadu with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.The institution vide its letter dated 18.07.2011 submitted Demand Draft of Rs.40.000/- for shifting of premises along with duly filled in questionnaire.

The Institution required for shifting of premises to following address:-

Amman College of EducationPillaiyarnatham, Pithalaipatty (Po),Dindigul – 624 002

The committee considered the written representation of the institution Dt. 18.07.2011 for shifting to new address and other documents submitted by the institution and decided to cause inspection at the new premises.

Consideration of Complaints/Reply to Complaints : (Vol-7)

Sl.No

CodeCourse


State

Remarks of SRC

104 ----

---

List of Complaint

received from

Consideration of complaints received from DTERT, Chennai vide in its various letters dated

with the request to take appropriate action against the following institutions.

Sl.No Application code & course

Name of the institution

Remarks of DTERT Recognition Status


171



DTERT, Chennai.

TN

1. APS04672D.T.Ed

Sri.Balaji Teacher Training Institute, No.23, V.P.Koil Street, Pichanoor, Gudiyatam, Vellore District – 632602, Tamilnadu

1. The institution is functioning in a rented building. Three years period has already been lapsed.

2. The management of the institute has not ready to shift the institute to its own building.

3. There are only two class rooms are available for running the institute.

4. Laboratory, Library facilities are not provided for the students.

5. The Principal post of the institute is vacant and the management of the institute has not been ready to fill up the post.

6. Non approved teaching staff are working.

7. Drinking water facilities, Toilet facilities are not adequate for the students.

Granted 09.01.2007

2. APS01150D.T.Ed

Matheri Teacher Training Institute, 66/72, Bazaar Street, Kaveripakkam, Vellore District – 632508, Tamilnadu

1. The institute is functioning in a leased asbestos roofing building. Three years period has already been lapsed.


3. No approved staff is working in the above institute.

4. Class rooms facilities are not adequate.

5. Drinking water facilities, Toilet facilities are not available in the institute.

6. Laboratory and library and mandatory requirements has not been provided for the students.

7. The management of the institute has not been filled up the vacancies post of staff members.

Granted 06.11.2004

3. APS04755D.T.Ed

Devi Vankatachalam Teacher Training

1. The institution is functioning in a rented building. Three years period has already been lapsed.

2. The management of the

Granted 24.10.2006

Recognition withdrawn


172



Institute, Kannaiar Campus, Valayampattu Post, Vaniyambadi, Vellore District – 635751, Tamilnadu

institute has not ready to shift the institute to its own building.

3. The pathway of the students is narrow and hence the students are suffering to go and come from the institute.

4. Ventilation facilities are not adequate for the students.

5. Laboratory facilities has not provided for the students.

6. The stagnation of water is forming many pools in and around the institution.

27.05.2011

4. APS04282D.T.Ed

CMS Teacher Training Institute, 142/C-7, TMM Building, Near RTO Office Salem Road, Namakkal District – 637001, Tamilnadu

1. The institute is functioning in the place a place of Marappanaickenpatty, Ernapuram, Namakkal District instead of 142/ C-7, TMM Building, Near RTO Office Salem Road, Namakkal District – 637001 as per National Council for Teacher Education recognition order.

2. The management of the institute has not been obtainined shifting permission from the NCTE.

3. The management has not been remitted Rs.40,000/- to NCTE for shifting permission. Three years period has already been lapsed.

4. Now the institute is functioning in a part of the building in the ground floor which the entire building has been accommodated by polytechnic classes in Marappanaickenpatty, Ernapuram, Namakkal Distr.

5. The management of the institute has not ready to shift the institute to its own permanent building.

6. Library, Laborartory and sufficient class rooms are not available to the students.

Granted 22.11.2005

Further, based on the complaint and per the decision of 195th meeting of SRC held on 17-18 August 2010 directed the institution to submit report from the affiliating university that there is no other course being run by the institution. Accordingly, a letter was issued on 24.09.2010 and the reply is awaited.

5. APS05687 Samy 1. The institute is functioning Granted


173



D.T.Ed Institute of Teacher Education, Gandhinagar, NH-7, West Bypass Road, Kattiganapalli Village, Krishnagiri District – 635001, Tamilnadu.

in a rented building. Three years period has already been lapsed.


3. The DIET Principal, Krishnagiri along with faculty members has been visited the above institute, and they found that the institute was locked on enquiry has been made with the building owner, it is stated that the institute was closed for the last two months, and no students has been admitted in the academic year 2009-200 and 2010-11.

09.01.2007

6. APS05668D.T.Ed

Jaishri Teacher Training Institute, No.65, Arakkonam Road, Tiruttani – 631209, Thiruvallur District, Tamilnadu

1. The institute is functioning in a leased old building. Three years period has already been lapsed.

2. The management of the institution has not ready to shift the institute to its own building.

3. Only two approved staff are working. The Principal and English lecturer posts are vacant. The management of the institute has not ready to fill up the vacancies posts. The institute has no adequate teaching staff as per NCTE norms.

4. The management of the institute has violated the Regulations, Nomrs and Standards of the NCTE.

Granted 05.01.2007

7. APS04677D.T.Ed

Anna Adarsh Teacher Training Institute, No.84, Grance Mansion, Sakthi Nagar,

1. The institute is functioning in a leased old building. Three years period has already been lapsed.


3. The total area of the building is 7725 sq.ft only.

4. Only one approved staff is

Granted 09.01.2007


174



Ponneri Post, Thiruvallur District – 601204, Tamilnadu

working. 5. The Principal post of the

institute is not filled by the management.

6. The institute has no adequate teaching staff as per NCTE norms.

7. The management of the institute has violated the Regulations, Norms and Standards of the NCTE.

8. APS01384

D.T.Ed

Ruth Williams Teacher Training Institute, Plot No.46, I Street, L.H. Nagar, Adambakkam – 600 088, Chennai District, Tamilnadu

1. The institute is functioning in a rented building. Three years period has already been lapsed.


3. Adequate class rooms are not available to the students.

4. Drinking water facilities, Toilet facilities are not provided sufficiently to the students.

5. Laboratory and Library facilities are not available to the students.

6. There is no approved staff are working in the above institute.

7. The management of the institute has violated the Regulations, Norms and Standards of the NCTE.

Granted 01.09.2004

9. APS05383D.T.Ed

Chozhan Teacher Training Institute, No.37, Maliagai Street, Kancheepuram – 631502 District, Tamilnadu

1. The institute is functioning in a commercial rented building. Three years period has already been lapsed.


3. The class rooms are not in proper ventilation and not adequate for the students.

4. Laboratory, Library are not provided for the students.

5. Sufficient approved staff are not working in the institute as per NCTE norms.

Granted 28.09.2006


175



6. The management of the institute has violated the Regulations, Norms and Standards of NCTE.

10. APS01366D.T.Ed

Gnanamani Teacher Training Institute, No.9, Pudupalayam Road, Rasipuram – 638408, Namakkal District, Tamilandu

1. The institute is now functioning in the place of A.K. Samuthiram, Pachal, Namakkal District instead of No.9, Pudupalayam Road, Rasipuram, Namakkal District – 638408 as per NCTE recognition order.

2. The management of the institute has not been obtained shifting permission from the NCTE.

3. The management has not been remitted Rs.40,000/- to NCTE for shifting permission. Three years period has already been lapsed.

4. Now the above institution is functioning in the campus of engineering classes and engineering laboratories.

5. The management of the institute has not ready to shift the institute to its own permanent building.

6. The management of the institute has violated the Regulations, Norms and standards of the NCTE.

Granted 01.09.2004

Additional intake granted on 03.09.2005 thus making an annual intake of 100 students (50 existing and 50 additional intake)

The Committee considered the complaint received from DTERT, Chennai and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act to the following 10 institutions, for the specific defciencies as pointed out against each of the above by the DTERT.

1) D.T.Ed (APS04672), Sri.Balaji Teacher Training Institute, Gudiyatam, Vellore District – 632602, Tamilnadu, 2) D.T.Ed (APS01150) Matheri Teacher Training Institute, Kaveripakkam, Vellore District – 632508, Tamilnadu 3) D.T.Ed (APS04755), Devi Vankatachalam Teacher Training Institute, Vaniyambadi, Vellore District – 635751, Tamilnadu, 4) D.T.Ed (APS04282), CMS Teacher Training Institute, Salem Road, Namakkal District – 637001, Tamilnadu,5) D.T.Ed(APS05687)Samy Institute of Teacher Education, Gandhinagar, Krishnagiri District – 635001, Tamilnadu.


176



6) D.T.Ed (APS05668), Jaishri Teacher Training Institute,Tiruttani – 631209, Thiruvallur District, Tamilnadu, 7) D.T.Ed (APS04677), Anna Adarsh Teacher Training Institute, Ponneri Post, Thiruvallur District – 601204, Tamilnadu, 8) D.T.Ed (APS01384), Ruth Williams Teacher Training Institute, Adambakkam – 600 088, Chennai District, Tamilnadu, 9) D.T.Ed (APS05383), Chozhan Teacher Training Institute, Kancheepuram – 631502 District, Tamilnadu, 10) D.T.Ed (APS01366), Gnanamani Teacher Training Institute, Rasipuram – 638408, Namakkal District, Tamilandu.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to all the above 10 institutions as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to each of the institutions to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available, with no further notice

Consideration of the Replies Received for Conversion from 7 (9) to 7(11) (Formal Recognition) (VOL-8)

Sl.No

CodeCourse


State

Remarks of SRC

105 APS09331D.Ed

Arundathi Educational Society, Ranga Reddy District.

AP

An application was submitted by Arundhathi Educational society, Ranga Reddy Dist, Andhra Pradesh for grant of recognition to D.Ed. course in the office of SRC-NCTE Bangalore vide dated 05.08.2008. The file was under process and in the meanwhile, in view of the recommendations of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh vide letter dated 07.01.2009 not to further recognize/permit the institutions for conducting B.Ed, D.Ed, physical Education, Language Pandit course (S).

The SRC in its 169th meeting held on 12-13th January, 2009 having considered the letter dated 07.01.2009 of State Government of Andhra Pradesh and decided to give effect to the decision of above decision of State Government of Andhra Pradesh as such, with immediate effect. A letter dated


177



07.02.2009 forwarded by Principal Secretary of Education requesting not to accord further recognition/permission to the new colleges/private B.Ed, D.Ed, Physical Education, Language Pandit in the state of Andhra Pradesh as the above colleges are exceeding in numbers than required. A letter dated 17the March, 2009 was received from NCTE Hqrs informing that the “The recommendations of the Govt. of Andhra Pradesh not to grant recognition/permission in respect of other courses like B.Ed, D.Ed, and Physical Education courses have further been considered in NCTE and it has been decided that no further recognition/permission to any institution in the state Andhra Pradesh be considered by SRC for the academic session 2009-10 for B.Ed, D.Ed. and physical Education Courses also”. The State Government vide its letter dated 20.03.2009 informed that it has been decided not to recommend the name of the institution.

The State Govt. letter dated 07.01.2009, 07.02.2009, 17.03.2009 and 20.03.2009 were considered by SRC in its 172nd meeting held on 25th-26th

March 2009 and SRC decided to accept the recommendation of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh, not to grant recognition to any of the Teacher Institutions in the state of Andhra Pradesh for the year 2009-10 and decided to close the applications.

As per direction of Southern Regional committee a letter was sent to correspondent of the institution on 22.04.2010 with intimation that the application submitted by Arundhathi Educational Society, Ranga Reddy Dist, Andhra Pradesh here by closed. No further correspondence whatsoever will be entertained in this regard.

Institution has approached Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in W.P.No.25762 of 2010 in writ petition no. 20287/2010 without approaching Appellate authority NCTE under section 18 of NCTE Act, 1993. The Court order dated 31.12.209 states as under –

“ In the light of the order passed by this court in the similar writ petitions WP no. 6712/2009, WP no. 9360/2010 and WP no. 11078/2010, there shall be a direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner’s application for starting D.Ed course in accordance with law without reference to the State Govt. ‘s policy dated 17.10.2009.”Institution had previously submitted processing fee of Rs 40,000/-which is deposited into NCTE Account.

The matter was placed before 196th meeting of SRC held on 15th –16th

September, 2010, the Regional Committee decided to process the application.

The institution has submitted original FDR of five and three lacks, BCC dated 07.09.10, Affidavit dated 08.09.10 and copy of land documents for sy no. 250


178



situated at Dommar Poohampally village, Quthbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy Distt, Andhra Pradesh. The building plan on the said land are available in the file. The SRC may provide names of VT Member for causing inspection. The SRC had vide its letter dated 19.09.2008 sought consent of inspection for causing inspection and in view of state Govt’s ban the file was closed. The SRC considered the matter and all relevant documents and decided to cause inspection to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme.The institution submitted its written representation on 09.11.2010. The Committee considered the VT Report,VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice for the following deficiencies:As per the VCD observation it is found that the top floor roof of the building is covered with asbestos sheets as evident from VCD. This is against the NCTE norms. The building completion certificate issued by the competent authority has not made any remarks regarding this. Reply to Letter of intent prior to recognition in r/o S. V. Model D.Ed College, Anundhathi Educational Society, Survey no. 250, Ward No. 1, Ranga Reddy Distt, Andhra Pradesh. (Course- D.Ed) was considered.

As per direction of Southern Regional Committee in its 200th meeting letter of intent prior to recognition was issued to applicant institution on 24.01.2011.

In response to this office letter dated 24.01.2011 the institution has submitted reply vide letter dated 22.06.2010 and 08.07.2011. As per regulation 2007 one principal , five lecturers are required for D.Ed course.

The list of staff as possessing qualification is only signed by Director, SCERT, Hyderagbad, Andhra Pradesh.

The website of the college is www.svmded.com. The FDRs in respect of Endowment fund and Reserve fund have been not converted to joint name as stipulated in LOI. The Management has submitted teaching profile.

The Committee considered the matter and it was decided to serve Notice for the following deficiencies:-

The FDRs in respect of Endowment and Reserve fund is not converted to joint name as stipulated in LOI.

The lecturers 1/ Y. Swarna Lata, 2/ Mohd. Abdul raseed, & 3/ K. Laxmi Narayan, are not qualified as per NCTE regulations.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue Notice to the institution and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written


179



representation within 30days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter, failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available, with no further notice.

As per direction the institution has submitted reply vide letter dated 19.08.2011 and stated that already all documents submitted on 19.07.2011. As per perusal of the file the teaching faculty as under:-

On Careful perusal of the original file of the institution, reply of the institution and staff profiles submitted by the institution in response to the show cause notice, the Regional Committee decided that Formal Recognition be granted to D.Ed course of two year duration with an annual intake of 50 (Fifty only) students for the session 2012-13.

106 APS09669B.Ed

Ushodaya Residential School Committee, Guntur.

AP

Ushodaya Residential School Committee, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.

An application was submitted by Ushodaya Residential School Committee, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh for grant of recognition to B.Ed course in the office of SRC-NCTE, vide dated 30.10.2008

The file was under process and in the meanwhile, in view of the recommendations of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh vide letter dated 07.01.2009 not to further recognised/permit the institutions for conducting B.Ed, D.Ed, Physical Education, Language Pandit course(s).

The SRC in its 169th Meeting held on 12-13 January, 2009 having considered the letter dated 07.01.2009 of State Government of Andhra Pradesh and decided to give effect to the above decision of State Government of Andhra Pradesh as such, with immediate effect.

A letter dated 07.02.2009 forwarded by Principal Secretary of Education requesting not to accord further recognition/permission to the new colleges/private B.Ed, D.Ed, Physical Education, Language Pandit in the State of Andhra Pradesh as the above colleges are exceeding in numbers than required.

A letter dated 17.03.2009 has been received from NCTE, Hqrs informing that

“The recommendations of the Govt. of Andhra Pradesh not to grant recognition/permission in respect of other courses like B.Ed, D.Ed and Physical Education courses have further been decided that no further Recognition/ Permission to any institution in the State of Andhra Pradesh be considered by SRC for the academic session 2009-2010 for B.Ed, D.Ed, and Physical Education courses also”.

The State Government vide its letter dated 20.03.2009 informed that it has


180



been decided not to recommend the name of this institution. The letters dated 07.01.2009, 07.02.2009, 17.03.2009 and 20.03.2009 was considered by SRC in its 172nd Meeting held on 25-26 March, 2009 and SRC decided to accept the recommendation of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh, not to grant recognition to any of the Teacher Training Institutions in the State of Andhra Pradesh for the year 2009-2010 and decided to close the applications.

As per the decision of SRC the application was closed on 27.04.2009 and original application and DD for Rs.40000/- to the institution is returned.

The Institute has approached to Hon’ble High Court in W.P.No.21400/2010.

Now, the Hon’ble High Court has passed an order on 27.08.2010 as hereunder:“In the light of he orders passed by this court in similar W.P.Nos.6714 of 2009, 9360 of 2010, there shall be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner’s application for starting B.Ed., course in accordance with law without reference to the State Government’s policy dated 17.01.2009. Post along with W.P. Nos 6714 of 2009, 9360of 2010 and 11078 of 2010”.

SRC considered the matter in its 196th Meeting held on 15-16 September, 2010 Meeting held on 15-16 September, 2010 meeting and directed the Management/institution to resubmit the old application returned by SRC along with necessary documents as originally submitted relating to land, building, FDR, Application fee, Building Completion Certificate from competent Government Engineer/authority and other relevant aspects for processing and for necessary action.

As per direction of Regional Committee a letter was issued on 25.10.2010. In response to this office letter dated 25.10.2010 the institution has submitted reply vide letter dated 27.11.2010.

As per perusal of the file the institution has submitted following documents vide letters dated 29.11.2010 :-

1. Processing fee and application fee (40,000+1,000= 41,000/-) 2. Land documents-The Deed of Sale is Executed on 25th of November

2006 for Sy No 158/9A, 158/10B1, 158/11A, 158/12B. in favour of Ushodaya Residential School Committee, Dachepalli.

3. BCC Certificate from Assistant Engineer. dated 10-11-2008, for Sy No 158/9A, 158/10B1, 158/11A, 158/12B.Ed, Narayanapuram, Built up area-17553.5 Sq.ft.

4. Land use Certificate by Tahsildar.5. Approved Building Plan by Assistant Engineer, for Sy No-158/9A,


181



158/10B1, 158/11A, 158/12B.Ed, Land area-Ac.1-10guntas, Built up area-1632.5 Sq.mts.

6. FDR submitted in photo copy original verified.7. Encumbrance Certificate 8. Bye laws of Society Registration9. Copy of Affidavit of Rs 100/- Sy No-158/9A, 158/10B1, 158/11A,

158/12B.Ed, Land area-Ac.1-10guntas, Built up area-1632.5 Sq.mts.10. Copy of Original Application

The committee in its 199th meeting held on 23-24 December 2010 considered the written explanation to the notice and other documents submitted by the institution and decided to cause inspection. Inspection was conducted on 07.02.2011.

The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following :

1. As per VCD, it is clear that the part of the building is Asbestos roofed in the 1st floor, which is against NCTE norms.

2. As per VCD, ladies toilets, Art & Music rooms are covered with asbestos roof which is not permitted as per NCTE norms.

3. As per VCD, plastering walls, internal rooms, front portion is incomplete.

4. As per VCD, all materials are dumped in the rooms.

5. As per VCD, entrance of each rooms carry pasted papers which reads the purpose for which each room is assigned as temporary arrangement. This should be explained.

As per direction of SRC SCN was issued on 17.3.2011. In response to this office letter dt. 17.3.2011. The Institution has submitted reply dated 13.4.2011

The institution has produced self declaration affidavit to the effect that above statements are true.

VCD showing completion of building submitted as proof Building Completion Certificate dated 10.11.2008 for Servey no. 158/9A,158/10B1,158/11A, 158/12B issued by Assistant Engineer M.P. DACHEPALLY for total built up area of G.F.13,433sq.ft., F.F.4120.50 sq. ft. submitted.

On the basis of the scrutiny of the documents submitted by the institution,


182



input received from the visiting teamreport and videography, the SRC in its 204th meeting held on 27-28 April, 2011 considered the reply of the showcause notice of the institution dt. 12.04.2011 and decided to issue letter of intent before grant of formal recognition under regulation 7 (11) is considered. The institution has submitted its reply on 16.05.2011.

The Committee considered the matter and it was decided to serve Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following deficiencies:-

The Principal is not possessing P.hD qualification/not qualified for the post of Principal as per NCTE norms.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue Notice to the institution and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter, failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available, with no further noticeAs per direction of SRC SCN was issued on 08.07.11. In response to this office letter dated 08.07.11 the institution has submitted reply vide letter dated 12.08.11.

On Careful perusal of the original file of the institution, reply of the institution and staff profiles submitted by the institution in response to the show cause notice Dt. 08.07.2011, the Regional Committee decided that Formal Recognition be granted to B.Ed (APS09669) course of one year duration with an annual intake of 100 (One hundred only) students for the session 2012-13.

107 SRCAPP334H.P.T.

Success Hindi Pandit Training College

Kurnool

Success Hindi Pandit Training College, 4-218, Nidzuru, Kurnool-518004, Andhra PradeshAn application was submitted by Success Hindi Pandit Training College, 4-218, Nidzuru, Kurnool-518004, Andhra Pradesh for H.P.T course of one year duration to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 30.09.2010.

The application was processed and the deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 17.01.2011. The institution submitted its written representation on 09.03.2011.

The SRC considered the deficiency reply in its 202nd meeting held on 14th –15th March 2011 considered the reply of the institution dated 09.03.2011 for the deficiencies and decided to cause inspection of the institution under section 14 of NCTE Act to verify the infrastructural and instructional facilities.

The inspection of the institution was conducted on 01.04.2011. The Committee in its 204th meeting held on 28th April 2011 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided


183



to serve Show cause Notice.

As per the decision of SRC the show cause notice was issued on 26.05.2011. Institution submitted its reply on 07.06.2011. On careful perusal of VT report, VCD and the original file of the institution, reply of the institution dt.07.06.2011 and other related documents, Act of NCTE, 1993, Regulations and guidelines of NCTE published from time to time laid on the table, the Regional Committee decided to issue Letter of Intent for grant of recognition to H.P.T. course of one year duration with an annual intake of 100 (One hundred only)(one unit) for the academic year 2011-12 subject to the appointment of qualified staff through duly constituted selection committee as per the Norms of NCTE/State Government/Affiliating University and be given effect before the commencement of the academic session.As per direction of SRC letter of intend was issued on 15.06.2011.In response to SRC letter dated 15.06.2011 the institution has submitted reply of LOI vide letter dated 19.08.2011. In TPT course NCTE regulation does not speak. The status of teaching faculty as per approval list by Director, SCERT which are as under:-.

On Careful perusal of the original file of the institution, reply of the institution and staff profiles submitted by the institution in response to the show cause notice, the Regional Committee decided that Formal Recognition be granted to H.P.T course of two year duration with an annual intake of 50 (Fifty only) students for the session 2012-13.

108 SRCAPP403D.El.Ed

Abdul Kalam D.Ed College Minority

Institution, Nazamabad

AP

Reply to Letter of intent prior to recognition in respect of Abdul Kalam DED College Minority institution, Plot No. 429/9, NS Road,Lingapur village, Kamareddy Taluk, Nizamabad Dist- 503 111, Andhra Pradesh.

As per direction of Southern Regional Committee in its meeting 208 th Meeting held on 13th and 14th July 2011 letter of intent prior to recognition was issued to applicant institution on 20.07.2011.

In response to this office letter dated 20.07.2011 the institution has submitted reply vide letter dated 11.08.2011. As per regulation 2007 one principal , Seven lecturers are required for D.El.Ed course.

The Committee considered the matter and it was decided to serve Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following deficiencies:-

FDRs for Rs. 5 lacs and Rs. 3 lacs submitted is only for one year duration, it should of five years duration in joint account to be submitted.

Experience certificate of the Principal is to be submitted.


184



Approved staff list from affiliating body is to be submitted.

Only two lecturers are appointed for Methodology course against three required.

K. Bhaskar, Lecturer in social methodology is not qualified as he is not having PG in School subject.

Website is not updated.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue Notice to the institution and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter, failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available, with no further notice.


A.K. College of Teacher Education

Muslim Minority institution, Medak

AP

Ameerudin Academy of General Technical and Professional Educational Society, 120 U, Komuravellykaman, Sarlapall, Thijmmareddypalli, Kondapak, Medak Distt, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to AK College of Teacher Education Muslim Minority Institution, 121/A, Sarlapalli, Thimmareddypalli, Medak-502372, Andhra Pradesh. for D.El.Ed Course of two year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on line 29.09.2010

The Application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government for recommendation on 09.11.2010/02.02.2011. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 10.12.2010 for the following Points:

1. Fixed Deposit Receipt for Rs 5.00 lakhs of Nationalized bank towards Endowment funds- the institution has submitted photo copy of FDR of Rs 5.00 lakhs towards Endowment funds vide no 946910 dated 27.08.2010 for one year issued by Andhra Bank. Hence the institution is required to submit FDR in original for proposed course as per regulation.

2. Fixed Deposit Receipt for Rs 3.00 lakhs of Nationalized bank towards Reserved fund - the institution has submitted photo copy of FDR of Rs 3.00 lakhs towards Reserved fund vide no 946909 dated 27.08.2010 for one year issued by Andhara Bank. Hence the institution is required to submit FDR in original for proposed course as per regulation.

3. Building completion certificate:- The institution has not submitted building completion certificate issued by local civil authority in prescribed format. Hence the institution is required to submit Building completion certificate issued by local civil authority in prescribed format. (copy enclosed)


185



4. Notarized copy of Change of land use Certificate issued by the competent authority - the institution has not submitted notarized copy of change of land use certificate issued by the competent authority. Hence the institution is required to submit notarized copy of (conversion of land utilization) LUC (Agriculture lands –conversion to Non – Agricultural purpose) issued by competent/revenue authority.

5. Minority Certificate:- the institution is minority institution as per application form, however the institution has not submitted minority certificate in this regard. Hence the institution is required to submit minority certificate issued by competent authority.

6. Duly notarized copy of registered land documents to be submitted by the institution

The inspection of the institution was conducted on 30.03.2011.

The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve the Show cause Notice for the following:

In the approved building plan by the competent civil authority, plot no. /survey no./Khashra no. are not mentioned.

The survey numbers in the Building completion certificate and Land documents (121/A) are not matching with Land usage certificate (120/A).

Multiple purpose hall size is less than the requirement of Regulation 2009.

Website is not available.

As per direction of SRC SCN was issued to the applicant institution on 02.06.2011. In response to this office notice dated 02.06.2011 the institution submitted reply vide letter dated 24.06.2011.

As per direction of Southern Regional Committee in its meeting 208th held on 13th & 14th of July 2011 decided to issue Letter of Intent to the institution prior to grant of recognition on 20.7.2011.

In response to this office letter dated 20.07.2011 the institution has submitted reply vide letter dt. 11.08.2011. As per regulations 2007 one Principal, Six lecturers are required for D.El.Ed course. The management has submitted teaching staff profile.The list of staff are signed as possessing qualification by principal, AK college of Teacher Education, Thimmareddy pally, Mandal Kandapak, Medk District.


186



The website of the college is www.Akded.webs.com. The FDRs in respect of Endowment fund and Reserve fund have been converted to joint name as stipulated in LOI. The maturity date is 27.08.2011.

The management has submitted teaching profile.

The Committee considered the reply of the institution Dt. 11.08.2011 and it was decided to serve Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following deficiencies:-


Approved staff list from affiliating body is to be submitted.

Marks card of the following lecturers are not submitted:1) R. Bhaskar, 2) Ch.Ramachandram & 3) M.V.

Sathyanarayanan Librarian.

Website is not updated.


110 SRCAPP409B.Ed

S.R. College of Teacher Education

AP

Kalam Educational Society, Dubbak, Medak, Andhra Pradesh had submitted an application for seeking recognition to SR College of Teacher Education Muslim Minority Institution, No.117, Dubbak, H Road, Medak-502108, Andhra Pradesh.

The Application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government for recommendation on 09.11.2010/02.02.2011. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 09.12.2010 for the following Points:1. Fixed Deposit Receipt for Rs 5.00 lakhs of Nationalized bank towards Endowment funds- the institution has submitted the photo copy of FDR of Rs 5.00 lakhs towards Endowment funds vide no 557286 dated 29.09.2010 for one year issued by Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank. Hence the institution is required to submit FDR in original for proposed course from a Nationalised bank as per regulation.

2. Fixed Deposit Receipt for Rs 3.00 lakhs of Nationalized bank towards Reserved fund - the institution has submitted the photo copy of FDR of Rs 3.00 lakhs towards Reserved fund vide no 552787 dated 29.09.2010 for one


187

http://www.Akded.webs.com/



year issued by Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank. Hence the institution is required to submit FDR in original for proposed course from a Nationalised bank as per regulation.

3. Notarized copy of Change of land use Certificate issued by the competent authority - The institution has not submitted the copy of change of land use certificate issued by the competent authority. Hence the institution is required to submit notarized copy of (conversion of land utilization) LUC (Agriculture lands – conversion to Non – Agricultural purpose) issued by competent authority.

4. Building completion certificate:- The institution has submitted the building completion certificate which is not issued by local civil authority/Government Engineer and it is not in prescribed format. Hence the institution is required to submit Building completion certificate issued by local civil authority/Government Engineer in prescribed format. (copy enclosed)

5. Minority Certificate:- the institution is minority institution as per application form, however the institution has not submitted minority certificate in this regard. Hence the institution is required to submit minority certificate issued by competent authority

6. Duly notarized copy of registered land document to be filed. The inspection of the institution was conducted on 01.04.2011.

The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice. for the following:

From VCD observation, it is observed that the building is incomplete.

Language learning lab is not available.As per direction of SRC SCN was issued to the applicant institution on 27.05.2011. In response to this office letter dated 27.05.2011 the institution has submitted reply vide letter dated 24.06.2011, explaining and clarifying the points raised in the show cause notice.The institution submitted application for B.Ed course on 07.10.2010. As per direction of SRC in its 208th Meeting held on 13-14th of July 2011 decided to issue letter of intent prior to recognition. LOI was issued to applicant institution on 20.07.2011.

In response to this office letter Dt. 20.07.2011 the institution has submitted repy vide letter Dt. 02.08.2011. As per regulation 2007 one Principal, Seven lecturers are required for B.Ed course.

The list of staff are signed as possessing qualification by Registrar, Osmania, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh.


188



The Website of the college is WWW.Srcoe.webs.com. Web site is functioning. The FDRs in respect of Endowment fund and Reserve fund have not been converted to joint name as stipulated in LOI. Maturity date of FDRs is 02.02.2012.

The Committee considered the matter and it was decided to serve Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following deficiencies:-


Marks card of the following lecturers are not submitted:1) B.Srinivas Reddy, 2) Sunitha Abbagoni



Chaitanya College of Education, Prakasham

AP

Status of the institution who has not submitted reply of Letter of intent as per direction of SRC. List of the institution who have not submitted reply after expire of 60 days as per New Regulation, 2009.

S.No.

Name of the institution and file no. Course Date of issue of LOI

01 Chaitanaya College of Education, Kandulapuram,Cumbum, Prakasham Distt, Andhra Pradesh. (File No. SRAPP386)

D.El.Ed 15.06.2011

The Committee considered the reply of the institution, VT Report and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice for the following:

After scrutinizing all the records of the institution and input provided by the visiting team Dt. 31.03.2011 and VCD, observation the committee had decided and issued Letter of Intent as per letter Dt. 15.06.2011. The institution was directed to submit the following documents before issue of formal recognition:

i ) The institution shall make appointment of faculty/staff by a


189

http://WWW.Srcoe.webs.com/



duly constituted selection committee and ensure selection of candidates possessing qualifications as prescribed under rules. After appointment of faculty/staff, Affidavits as under should be submitted.

a) An Affidavit on Rs. 100/- stamp paper to the effect that the institution has appointed staff as per NCTE/State/University norms.

b) Annexure –II An affidavit on Rs. 10/- non-judicial stamp paper by the individual faculty member appointed by the institution.

c ) Annexure – III – Details should be filled by every faculty member appointed.

ii) The institution shall submit a notarizede undertaking declaring them as minority trust and minority institution proposed to be established. The institution shall giving an undertaking that the management shall produce valid minority certificate from the notified authority of the respective State Government on or before 31st March 2012, failing which, the institution shall be de-recognized automatically without any further notice and that such institution shall make no further admission thereafter.

The management has not submitted reply even after expiry of 60 days to the above points as per New regulations 2009.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the LOI be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal of LOI based on the records available, with no further notice.

112 APP461B.Ed

Dr.Penubala Penchalaiah College

of Education, Rly Koduru, Kadapa

AP

Dr. Penubala Penchalaiah College of Education, Rly Koduru, Kadapa, Andhra PradeshDr. Penubala Penchalaiah College of Education, Rly Koduru, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh submitted an application to SRC-NCTE for grant of recognition for B.Ed course on online 01.10.2010. The Application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government for recommendation on 04.12.2010/21.03.2011. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 19..01.2011.

Fixed Deposit Receipt for Rs 5.00 lakhs of Nationalized bank

towards Endowment funds- the institution has not submitted FDR of Rs 5.00 lakhs towards Endowment funds. Hence the institution is


190



required to submit original fresh FDR issued for proposed course as per regulation.

Fixed Deposit Receipt for Rs 3.00 lakhs of Nationalized bank towards Reserved fund - the institution has not submitted FDR of Rs 3.00 lakhs towards Reserved fund. Hence the institution is required to submit fresh original FDR issued for proposed course as per regulation.

Affidavit in the prescribed form on Rs 100/ stamp paper duly attested by oath commissioner or Notary public, stating the precise location of the land (village, district, state etc) the total area in possession, the permission of the competent authority to use the land for educational purpose and mode of possession i.e. ownership or lease :- the institution has not submitted affidavit of Rs 100/- stamp paper attested by Oath Commissioner or Notary public. Hence the institution is required to submit original affidavit of Rs 100/- stamp paper.

Building completion certificate:- The institution has not submitted the building completion certificate issued by local civil authority in prescribed format. Hence the institution is required to submit Building completion certificate issued by local civil authority/Govt. Engineer in prescribed format. (copy enclosed)

Notarized copy of Change of land use Certificate issued by the competent authority - the institution has not submitted the copy of change of land use certificate issued by the competent authority. Hence the institution is required to submit notarized copy of (conversion of land utilization) LUC (Agriculture lands – conversion to Non – Agricultural purpose) issued by competent authority.

Approved building plan by the competent civil authority :- institution has not submitted building plan. Hence the institution is required to submit approved building plan approved by civil competent authority. wherein it should be clearly mentioning i.e Khasra no, plot no, proposed course, total area, built up area duly approved by competent authority with resolution in all respect either in English or Hindi language. If the institution has running other teacher education courses/ other technical courses in the same premises then, the institution shall submit earmarked area for proposed course with total area and built up area.

Minority Certificate:- the institution is minority institution as per application form, however the institution has not submitted minority certificate in this regard. Hence the institution is required to submit


191



minority certificate issued by competent authority

Certified copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent authority :- The institution has submitted Photocopy of registered land documents in Telugu version, and it is not certified by the competent authority. Hence, the institution is required to submit certified copy of the land documents issued by the office of the Sub-Registrar or Competent issuing authority in English version.

The plot No.2177 Village-Rly Koduru, Taluka-Rly Koduru, Distt- Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh mentioned in the application form whereas building plan/affidavit/BCC/LUC the Khasara No. 1712, Surapurajapalli Village, Rly Kodur, Kadapa. Hence, the plot No does not match with other documents i.e Affidavit, Building plan, BCC, LUC, and Sale deed. The committee its 203rd meeting held on 31st March and 1st April 2011,considered the reply of institution dt. 18.03.2011 for the deficiencies and decided to cause inspection of the institution under Section 14 of NCTE Act to verify the infrastructural and instructional facilities.The inspection of the institution was done on 21.04.2011.The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve the Show cause Notice for the following:

The management has submitted the application vide address as Plot no. 2177 village Rly Koduru, Taluk-rly Koduru, district Kadapa, AP, where as in the building plan/affidavit/BCC/LUC the Khasara no. mentioned is 1712, Surapurajapalli Village, Rly Kodur, Kadapa. Further, The Inspection was conducted at No. 1712, Rly Koduru, Kadapa. AP. This is not matching with the application form submitted and it amounts to misleading/trying to suppress the facts from NCTE and a serious violation of norms and regulations.

As per direction of SRC a letter was issued to the institution on 22.06.2011. In response to this office letter dated 22.06.2011 the institution has submitted reply vide letter dated 06.07.2011and 08.07.11, explaining and clarifying the points raised in the show cause notice.

The Committee considered the reply of the institution dt.06.07.2011and 08.07.2011,other related documents, Act of NCTE, 1993, Regulations and guidelines of NCTE published from time to time laid on the table, and the reply to the show cause notice, the Regional Committee decided to issue Letter of Intent for grant of recognition to B.Ed. course of one year duration with an annual intake of 100(One hundred only)(one unit) for the academic year 2011-12 subject to the appointment of qualified staff through duly constituted selection committee as per the Norms of NCTE/State


192



Government/Affiliating University and be given effect before the commencement of the academic session.As per direction of SRC letter of intend was issued on 20.07.2011.In response to SRC letter dated 20.07.2011 the institution has submitted reply of LOI vide letter dated 18.08.2011. As per Regulation 2009 one principal and Seven lecturer is required. The institution has submitted teaching profile of one principal and seven lecturer. The status of teaching faculty as per approval list by Registrar, Yogi Yemana University, Kadapa-516003, Andhra Pradesh which are as

The list of staff are signed as possessing qualification by Yogi Yemana University, Kadapa-516003, Andhra Pradesh.. The website of the college is functional. The photo copy notarized by notary of FDRs in respect of Endowment fund and Reserve fund have been converted to joint name as stipulated in LOI for one years.

The Committee considered the matter and it was decided to serve Notice for the following deficiencies:-

i/ Marks card for M.A Psychology is not legible/readable and the same are not available – of Shri P. Venkatachary, Principal.

ii/ Experience certificate as per certificate submitted and marks card for M.Sc (Mathematics) & M.Ed of Mr. S. Sreeramulu, Lecturer in Maths.

Iii/ Marks sheet for M.A (English) not given to ascertain if 50% marks scored or not for Mr. G. Ramachandrudu, Lecturer in Physical Science.



193