Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Sugar Silica Project
Sugar Silica Project
• Project Location• KCA Certified Analytic Services • Product End Uses (i.e. CNBM Premium and Ultra
Premium)• Operating Parameters• Mining Overview • Processing Overview • Infrastructure Overview • Proposed Area of Disturbance• Permitting Overview • Photography of Representative Material • CNBM Premium Products Specifications• CNBM Ultra Premium Specifications • KCA Premium Product Test Results • KCA Process Flow Sheet Premium • KCA Equipment Inventory List• KCA Ultra Premium Product Test Results • KCA Premium Product Test Results • KCA Process Flow Sheet Ultra Premium • KCA Equipment Inventory List• Transportation Analysis from Mine Site to Port of
Los Angeles
Sugar Silica Project
Table of Contents
Sugar Silica Project
Project Location
Sugar Silica Project
Sugar Silica Project
Since 1972, Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (KCA) has provided process metallurgical services to the international mining industry. KCA specializes in all aspects of heap leach and cyanide processing, including laboratory testing, project feasibility studies, engineering design, construction, and operations management.
While primarily known for its heap leach expertise, KCA's staff includes experienced professionals with design capabilities in a wide range of metallurgical processes, which include the processing and distribution of silica products throughout the United States.
For several years, KCA has expanded its client base and service capabilities extensively over the past several years. KCA occupies a 3800 square meter building in Reno, NV, which greatly increases KCA's capacity for engineering, manufacturing, purchasing, warehousing, and testing. Florin Analytical Services, part of the KCA group, operates as an independent commercial analytical lab, providing high quality, reliable assays.
https://www.kcareno.com
To review our credentials and qualifications please visit the following:
KCA Certified Analytic Services
Sugar Silica Project
Product End Uses
Proposed CNBM Product End Use: Permit under Mining Law / Mineral Materials Act
• CNBM Product End Uses/Industries: • Thin Glass • Fiberglass • Foundry Materials • Abrasives • Filtration
• Permitting | Salable Materials • Subject to Mineral Materials Act • Off-Take Contract (CNBM)
Sugar Silica Project
Operating Parameters
365 Days Per YearMine: 2, 8-hr shifts/day 1st Shift Production Only 2nd Shift Production & Maintenance 1,300 tons/day Production (nominal) 700 tons/day Waste 600 tons/day RoM
Plant: 1, 8-hr shift/day 600 tons/day (nominal)
No night production
* Disclaimer: the information provided above is subject to further discussion with CNBM regarding process flow, demand, product use.
Sugar Silica Project
Infrastructure Overview
Conventional Quarry
• No Drilling & Blasting • Mining - Front-End Loader • Hauling – Articulated Haul Trucks • Reclamation – Dozers • Support – Grader, Water Trucks
Sugar Silica Project
Processing Overview
Dry-Process – No Water Road Dust Control w/ Trucked-in Water Potable Water Hauled In
Crushing Primary-Jaw Crusher Secondary-Cone
Sizing VSI (Vertical Shaft Impact) Crushers Screen Plants
Products – Bulk Silos
Dust Collection – Baghouse System
Sugar Silica Project
Sugar Silica Project
Infrastructure Overview
Quality 2 Premium Sand • Administration Trailer • Maintenance Shop/Warehouse • Fuel Station • Scale • Water Tanks (for haul road dust control) • Septic System • Gate & FencingElectric Power • Power Line • Substation & DistributionEarthworks • Access Road • Haul Roads • Storm Water Structures
Sugar Silica Project
Proposed Area of Disturbance
Sugar Silica Project
The following is an internal memo outlining the number and type of federal, state and local environmental permits that have to be obtained. An anticipated time line for receiving the approval is also included. This time line is based on the authorities accepting an updated 2002 study. Based on these timelines the anticipated dates for starting the construction as well as operation need to be revised.
Environmental Permitting Summary Sugar Silica Project, Mercury, Nevada
Assumptions/Limitations:
1. The following environmental permitting summary is based on information obtained at this time. Permitting requirements may change based on project details obtained in the future.
2. Typical time estimates provided in this summary are based on the time required after all necessary information has been provided.
3. ypical time estimates are based on average preparation and agency review times. These estimates may vary based on application complexity and agency staffing.
4. The time estimate for approval of the NEPA Environmental Assessment assumes that BLM and USDA will accept an update of the previous EA prepared in 2003.
5. Based on project information, it is assumed that there will be no discharge of process water. All wastewater, except storm water and domestic sewage, will be transported off-site for disposal.
6. This list is limited to environmental permitting only. Additional safety, training, and registration requirements may exist through U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA).
Permitting Overview
Sugar Silica Project
Permitting Overview cont.
Agency Media/Topic Required Permit/Document
Regulation Typical Time Required for Issuance/Approval
Federal Environmental Requirements
U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
Mining Mining Plan of Operations
43 CFR 3601.40 or 43 CFR 3809.11
13 Weeks
BLM/ U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
All NEPA Environmental Assessment (EA)
43 CFR 3809.401(c )
13 Weeks
BLM Electricity/ Roadways
Right of Way for Electric Transmission Lines and Roadways on BLM Land
43 CFR 2800 13 Weeks
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Fuels/Oils/ Storage Tanks
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan - Includes provisions regarding aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) and underground storage tanks(USTs)
40 CFR 112 9 Weeks
EPA Hazardous Waste EPA Generator ID Number
40 CFR 262 1 Week
State Environmental Requirements
NDEP Bureau of Air Pollution Control
Air Class II/Surface Area Disturbance (SAD) Permit
NAC 445B 13 Weeks
NDEP Bureau of Water Pollution Control
Septic System NDEP's Onsite Sewage Disposal System Program
NRS 445A and NAC 445A
13 Weeks
NDEP Bureau of Water Pollution Control
Stormwater NPDES General Permit
NRS 445.465; and 40 CFR 122.26
9 Weeks
Department of Motor Vehicles and Public Safety
Hazardous Materials
Hazardous Materials Permit
NRS 477.045 and NAC 477.325
Obtain within 30 days of start up.
Sugar Silica Project
Permitting Overview cont.
Local Environmental Requirements
No city or county environmental permits have been identified at this time. However, the county may require certain permits including, but not limited to, building permits, a business license, or a request for a zoning change.
Other Permitting Requirements
State Fire Marshall Division
Fire and Life Safety
Plans Review NAC 477.740, NAC 477.750, and NRS 477
Prior to construction and operation
Nevada Division of Industrial Relations
Mining Notice of Opening of Mine
NRS 512.160 Submit prior to startup.
Nevada Division of Minerals
Mining Mine Registry Forms
NRS 513.063 and NRS 513.073
Submit within 30 days of startup
Nevada Division of Minerals
Mining Annual Status and Production Report
NRS 513.063 and NRS 513.073
Submit on or before April 15th of each year
Sugar Silica Project
Quality 2 Premium Sand
ASDID Holding Jordan, Amman, Khalda Amer Bin Malek Street, Bldg. 39 Mob: +962 (79) 706 5785 Tel: +962 (6) 552 8630 Fax: +962 (6) 553 8568
QUALITY 2 – PREMIUM SAND
CHEMICAL SPECIFICATIONS
SYMBOL NAME PERCENTAGE
SiO2 (total) Crystalline Silica 99.30 % ± 0.20%
Fe2O3 Iron Oxide ≤ 0.008 % ± 0.002
Cr2O3 Chromium(III) Oxide ≤ 0.001%
TiO2 Titanium Dioxide ≤ 0.01 %
Al2O3 Aluminum Oxide 0.30 % ± 0.05%
CaO Calcium Oxide ≤ 0.03 %
MgO Magnesium Oxide ≤ 0.01%
L.O.I Loss on ignition ≤ 0.3 %
PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS
RESULTS ( % ) ANALYSIS (MM)
0% + 0.750
2% + 0.500 - 0.750
8% - 0.100
Disclaimer: The information set forth in this Product Data Sheet represents typical properties of the
product described; the information and the typical values are not specification.
Chemical Specifications
Particle Size Analysis
ASDID Holding Jordan, Amman, Khalda Amer Bin Malek Street, Bldg. 39 Mob: +962 (79) 706 5785 Tel: +962 (6) 552 8630 Fax: +962 (6) 553 8568
QUALITY 2 – PREMIUM SAND
CHEMICAL SPECIFICATIONS
SYMBOL NAME PERCENTAGE
SiO2 (total) Crystalline Silica 99.30 % ± 0.20%
Fe2O3 Iron Oxide ≤ 0.008 % ± 0.002
Cr2O3 Chromium(III) Oxide ≤ 0.001%
TiO2 Titanium Dioxide ≤ 0.01 %
Al2O3 Aluminum Oxide 0.30 % ± 0.05%
CaO Calcium Oxide ≤ 0.03 %
MgO Magnesium Oxide ≤ 0.01%
L.O.I Loss on ignition ≤ 0.3 %
PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS
RESULTS ( % ) ANALYSIS (MM)
0% + 0.750
2% + 0.500 - 0.750
8% - 0.100
Disclaimer: The information set forth in this Product Data Sheet represents typical properties of the
product described; the information and the typical values are not specification.
Sugar Silica Project
Quality 3 Ultra Premium Sand
ASDID Holding Jordan, Amman, Khalda Amer Bin Malek Street, Bldg. 39 Mob: +962 (79) 706 5785 Tel: +962 (6) 552 8630 Fax: +962 (6) 553 8568
QUALITY 3 – ULTRA PREMIUM SAND
CHEMICAL SPECIFICATIONS
SYMBOL NAME PERCENTAGE
SiO2 (total) Crystalline Silica 99.50 % ± 0.20%
Fe2O3 Iron Oxide ≤ 0.006 % ± 0.002
Cr2O3 Chromium (III) Oxide ≤ 0.001%
TiO2 Titanium Dioxide ≤ 0.01 %
Al2O3 Aluminum Oxide 0.30 % ± 0.03%
CaO Calcium Oxide ≤ 0.03 %
MgO Magnesium Oxide ≤ 0.01%
L.O.I Loss on ignition ≤ 0.2 %
PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS
RESULTS (%) ANALYSIS (MM)
0% + 0.750
2% + 0.500 - 0.750
8% - 0.100
Disclaimer: The information set forth in this Product Data Sheet represents typical properties of the
product described; the information and the typical values are not specification.
Particle Size Analysis
Chemical Specifications
ASDID Holding Jordan, Amman, Khalda Amer Bin Malek Street, Bldg. 39 Mob: +962 (79) 706 5785 Tel: +962 (6) 552 8630 Fax: +962 (6) 553 8568
QUALITY 2 – PREMIUM SAND
CHEMICAL SPECIFICATIONS
SYMBOL NAME PERCENTAGE
SiO2 (total) Crystalline Silica 99.30 % ± 0.20%
Fe2O3 Iron Oxide ≤ 0.008 % ± 0.002
Cr2O3 Chromium(III) Oxide ≤ 0.001%
TiO2 Titanium Dioxide ≤ 0.01 %
Al2O3 Aluminum Oxide 0.30 % ± 0.05%
CaO Calcium Oxide ≤ 0.03 %
MgO Magnesium Oxide ≤ 0.01%
L.O.I Loss on ignition ≤ 0.3 %
PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS
RESULTS ( % ) ANALYSIS (MM)
0% + 0.750
2% + 0.500 - 0.750
8% - 0.100
Disclaimer: The information set forth in this Product Data Sheet represents typical properties of the
product described; the information and the typical values are not specification.
Sugar Silica Project
Nevada Quartzite Mine
Nevada Quartzite Mine /Ultra Fine Sand Production Flow Diagram October 2019
▪ 100 tons per hour feed ▪ Screen away 3/8”- Alluvial Gravel ▪ Primary Jaw Crusher 18 inch minus ▪ Vertical Impact Crusher feed 4 inch minus ▪Jet Mill feed 1 inch minus ▪ 160 equipment hours per month ▪ 16,000 tons per month 192,000 tons per year ▪ 10,000 tons storage
-3/8” Alluvial Natural Gravel
Notes
Hydro Cyclones
1 2 3 4
59
7
8Long Jaw
6
1 Grizzly Feed 18”-
2Primary Jaw Crusher
3 2 Deck Screen4 Secondary Crusher5 Screen6 Jet Mill7 Hydro Cyclones8 Dewater/Dryer9 Material Cooler
10 10,000 ton Storage11 Load Out
Grinding Jet Mill
Dryer
Impact Crusher
Screen
Grizzly Feed 2 Deck Screen
3 Deck Screen
Train and Truck Load Out
210
Storage and Loading
211
10,000 Ton Storage
Cooler
Phase 1 at Mine
Processing Equipment At Mine
Phase 2 Ultra Find Sand Production
Nevada Quartzite Mine /Ultra Fine Sand Production Flow DiagramOctober 2019
Sugar Silica Project
KCA Final Assay Premium
Florin Analytical Services 7950 Security Circle - Reno, Nevada 89506 - Phone (775) 677-2177 - FAX (775) 972-4567
Submitted by: The Burrell Group Laboratory No.: 192142602 E. Copper Ave., Suite 201 Client Number: F862Aspen, CO 81611 Date Received: 08 Oct 2019Attention: Dale Anderson & Eric Berntsen Date Completed: 09 Oct 2019Method: Lithium metaborate fusion, ICP analysis. Lab Code: 7046Element: SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 CaO MgO Na2O K2O TiO2 MnO SrO BaO Cr2O3 P2O5 LOI1000
oC SUM
Detection Limit: 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 Sample ID: % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
A 98.6 0.29 0.57
Sugar Silica Project
Nevada Quartzite Mine cont.
-1/2” Alluvial Natural Gravel
1 2 3
4 5
Long Jaw
Generator
6” to 1/2” Silica
Grizzly Feed 2 Deck Screen
Equipment at Mine
Nevada Quartzite Mine Mining and Sizing 1”- 6” Quartzite for Ultra Fine Sand
Production
1 Grizzly Feed -12”2 Jaw Crusher _6”3 2 Deck Screen4 300kw Generator5 10,000 gal W/Tank6 Excavator (2)7 Dozer8 Loader9 W/Truck
10 Ground Conveyors11 Stacking Conveyors12 Storage Trailer13 Office Trailer14 Fuel Storage
Notes▪Drill and Blast Quartzite ▪Size and Haul to Grizzly Feed ▪Feed 100 tons per hour ▪ Screen away 1/2”- Alluvial Gravel ▪ Primary Jaw Crusher ▪ 300kw Generator ▪10,000 gal Water Storage ▪ Stockpile 1”- 6” Minus ▪ 160 equipment hours per month ▪ 16,000 tons per month 192,000 tons pr year
Water Tank
11
11
10
10
Storage Trailer
Field Office
14
12
13
Fuel
The Burrell GroupOctober 2019
Phase 1 at Mine
Nevada Quartzite MineMining and Sizing 1”- 6” Quartzite for Ultra Fine Sand
Production
Sugar Silica Project
Plan of Operation
Operating Practices
The mine will be open 300 days a year with three, 8-hour shifts a day. The plant is scheduled to produce approximately 200,000 tons in the first year of operation, and then increase to approximately 250,000 tons per year over time. White silica ore will be excavated from the mining area using equipment listed below. Excavated materials will be transported to the processing plant by a conveyor system to be constructed as part of the project. Materials will then be stockpiled near, then loaded into the processing plant. The conveyor and stockpiles will be covered to control dust. The processing plant can process rock sized six inches and below. The feed rock will be sized down and processed into commercial grade products to be used in a broad range of applications and industrial sectors. The processing plant can produce the following sizes: 16, 20, 30, 60, and 90 (standard mesh). The processing plant is designed for a maximum production rate of 50 tons per hour. Storage, production, sales and shipments are synchronized with the production rates.
Equipment
Table 2 summarizes the mobile and portable equipment to be used at the proposed facility. All equipment listed below will be diesel-fueled.
Table 2 – Equipment List
PLAN OF OPERATIONS
Alta Environmental BURL-15-5733 May 27, 2016
6
2.3.3 Operating Practices
The mine will be open 300 days a year with three, 8-hour shifts a day. The plant is scheduled to produce approximately 200,000 tons in the first year of operation, and then increase to approximately 250,000 tons per year over time. White silica ore will be excavated from the mining area discussed in Section 2.3.2 using equipment listed in Section 2.3.4. Excavated materials will be transported to the processing plant by a conveyor system to be constructed as part of the project. Materials will then be stockpiled near, then loaded into the processing plant. The conveyor and stockpiles will be covered to control dust. The processing plant can process rock sized six inches and below. The feed rock will be sized down and processed into commercial grade products to be used in a broad range of applications and industrial sectors. The processing plant can produce the following sizes: 16, 20, 30, 60, and 90 (standard mesh). The processing plant is designed for a maximum production rate of 50 tons per hour. Storage, production, sales and shipments are synchronized with the production rates.
2.3.4 Equipment
Table 2 summarizes the mobile and portable equipment to be used at the proposed facility. All equipment listed below will be diesel-fueled.
Table 2 – Equipment List
Equipment Type Make Model Year Wheel Loader JCB 437 HT 2014
Excavator CASE CX250C 2012 Wheel Loader CAT 950K CFQ V 2012 Wheel Loader CAT 930K 2013
Skid Steer New Holland LS 180 2000 Forklift Tailift FDP35 2014 Forklift Toyota FD30 2015
Water Truck AM General M925 6x6 Water Truck 1985 Portable Light Tower TBD TBD TBD Portable Light Tower TBD TBD TBD Notes: The make, model, and model year of the light plants have not been determined at this time. The light plants are expected to be similar to Generac Model MLT5150M towers.
2.3.5 Devices
Besides mobile equipment, the devices proposed for the WCA Nye County Plant will be contained within the processing plant, plus one conveyor to transport materials from the quarry to the processing plant. The proposed processing plant includes five separate systems:
System-100: Crushing
System-200: Drying and Cooling
System-300: Finishing Screens
System-400: Finished Sand Distribution
System-500: Truck Load-Out and Packaging System.
Sugar Silica Project
Devices
Besides mobile equipment, the devices proposed for the BWR Nye County Plant will be contained within the processing plant, plus one conveyor to transport materials from the quarry to the processing plant. The proposed processing plant includes five separate systems:
• System-100: Crushing• System-200: Drying and Cooling• System-300: Finishing Screens• System-400: Finished Sand Distribution• System-500: Truck Load-Out and Packaging System.
Plan of Operation cont.
Sugar Silica Project
According to the USGS voluntary survey of U.S. producers, of all industrial sand and gravel produced, 60% was transported by truck from the plant to the site of first sale or use, down by 15% from 2012; 36% was transported by rail, up by 71% from 2012 (owing to increased fracturing sand shipments); and 4% was transported by unspecified modes of transport. Because BWR plans to initially sell in three target states, most transportation will take place via truck. However, depending on future demand for hydraulic fracturing sand or other uses that are prominent in other parts of the country, the list of target customers is expected to grow.
Freight and shipping costs are typically paid by the buyer. Location is a major factor in determining purchase decisions because proximity to product decreases the shipping cost to the buyer. Silica sand product can either be shipped using a flatbed truck or cement tanker. The approximate transportation costs from the BWR plant to major markets using a flatbed truck are outlined below:
• Las Vegas: $15/ton • Los Angeles: $45/ton • Phoenix: $40/ton
Transportation