sufficiency strategies urban architecture · summer school 2015, documentation sufficiency urban architecture strategies summer school 2015. 2. 3 contents introduction 4 participants

sum

mer

sch

ool 2

015,

doc

umen

tati

on sufficiency architectureurban

strategies

summer school 2015

2

3

contents introduction 4

participants 2015 11

program 19

impressions 23

lecturers 33

design workshop 39

student works 95

imprint 131

4

introduction

„Frankfurt Kitchen“ from Ernst May (1926) as first example of space efficient designsource: Förster, Wolfgang: Housing in the 20th and 21st Centuries; München / Berlin / London / New York 2006, S.39

5

Architecture and urban design portrays its society and reflects their cultural, soci-

al, and technological achievements. With this in mind, the façade of an individual

building and urban space represents and describes the residents of a given area.

Although the content and form of architectural expression has changed from one

era to the next, the role as the representative “face” of a society, even during the

radical façade reduction in classic modern times, has not changed. In accordance

with energy transition and the increased change from using fossil fuels to renewable

energy sources, building surfaces and urban spaces need to fulfill new demands.

Since the middle of 1977 architectural and urban surfaces meet increasing energy

requisites in addition to their representative and constructive tasks. This is due to

the enormous energy demands of buildings and cities worldwide. Globally cities are

responsible for 80% of our energy needs. Therefore a supply of renewable energy

needs to be decentrally organised and locally produced.

In the temperate climate of Germany, ever since the first German thermal Insulation

Ordinance in 1977, these energy requisites are dealt with particularly in terms of

heating. Aside from minimizing heat loss through the building envelope, passive

strategies that use solar power and sufficient openings make the interior rooms

livable. Residential buildings have developed, through the progressive reinforce-

ment of energy requirements, from a purely structural-physical principle to a passive

house standard. This sets particularly high demands on the quality of the building

envelope by strict limits on the transmission heat loss and high passive gains, regu-

lated through building openings. Further demands for passive gains require a cer-

tain amount of window surface area depending on the buildings compass direction

and a minimum distance between buildings. An energetic optimum in Germany is

achieved through maximizing building openings to the south and, at the same time,

minimizing openings on the other sides of the building.

In recent times active strategies for buildings and urban spaces have been in the

focus of research and planning. With the progressive development of technical sys-

tems such as solar panels or photovoltaic systems, more and more building surfaces

are producing the buildings own required energy. In the past years, a growing num-

sufficiency strategies urban architecture

6

introduction

ber of buildings with “zero-energy” or “plus-energy house” standard have been con-

structed. The buildings remaining energy demand is reduced through passive mea-

sures and profits from its own production of energy; electricity form Photovoltaic for

example. In many cases, a building can produce more energy than needed and thus

has a surplus of energy. In order to maximize energy production, specific buildings

shapes and surface designs have been developed. Plus-energy houses require, just

like passive houses, a minimum distance to surrounding buildings to avoid shade.

In addition, an energetic optimum is achieved by making use of south oriented roofs

and façades. Passive and active strategies require both south façades which can lead

to conflicts (passive-house: window positioning / plus-energy house: photovoltaic

surface). In addition, more conflicts arise in terms of the supply of daylight in inte-

rior rooms, ventilation, and design.

This shows that the requisites on the surface of buildings and urban spaces have

become very complex. It is the planers and architects job to balance out and fulfill

these complex requirements in order to have a holistic overall design. Adaptive can

mean a changing system that automatically reacts to the surrounding circumstan-

ces; passive or active matters through solar yield or sun and heat protection for

example. Another form of adaptation however can also be seen in terms of flexibi-

lity or multifunctional building structures that adapt to the ever changing building

requirements; a structure with a curtain wall that can easily be dismantled and

replaced to comply with changing building envelope demands.

7

the overall project

activeactive

summer school 2013

buildings-

cities,

adaptive structuresurban

skins

summer school 2014

sufficiencyarchitectureurban

strategies

summer school 2015

activeactive

summer school 2013

buildings-

cities,

adaptive structuresurban

skins

summer school 2014

sufficiencyarchitectureurban

strategies

summer school 2015

8

introduction

summer school 2013, active buildings – active cities

In the beginning, the many facets of sustainable architecture and urban planning

are discussed. The previously described limits of coverage and balance all the way

to establishing its potential on the scale level of the district. The expertise gained

by the field of Design and Energy Efficient Building through the “SolarDecathlon”

2007/2009 (zero plus houses – new buildings) and “Efficiency Plus in Old Buildings,

Neu-Ulm” (zero plus energy houses in old buildings) as well as the work in urban

projects “UrbanReNet”, “Plus-energy-district Oberursel” and “Energy strategy Heil-

bronn” are integrated into the teaching program.

summer school 2014, adaptive skins in urban structures

The second summer school in 2014 will engage into a deeper view into the necessa-

ry synergy for training and networking opportunities and the needs of active energy

systems. The lectures will focus on the integration of the surfaces of physical struc-

tures and urban spaces. The transformation of existing energy systems requires the

systematic use of local energy sources – it will become necessary to energetically use

the surfaces of buildings and spaces. A particular challenge here is the integration of

said systems without influencing the previous functions of the façade (for example:

so far; representation, weather protection; in the future; production of biomass,

energy storage; in the future; climate regulation).

summer school 2015, sufficiency strategies in urban architecture

Sufficiency is one of the three columns of sustainability. Nevertheless, until now

little attention has been paid to it in the architecture and urban planning. Research

topics about sustainable architecture currently focus on improvements in energy

efficiency, the integration of active systems into buildings or creating synergies by in-

terconnecting urban spaces. Increasing demands of the society have currently halted

all efforts. Energy demands have been lowered in Germany from approx. 210 kWh/

sq. m a (1949) to 150 kWh/sq. m a (2012). But all these savings have been “equa-

lized” by the increasing surface demand per person from 19 sq. m (1949) to 43 sq.

m (2012). Therefore all measures remain ineffective until sufficiency strategies are

developed and practiced.

9

The summer schools 2013-2015 at the Faculty of Architecture, TU Darmstadt pursue

the goal of an international networking and cooperation between universities and

the participating students in the subject area of sustainable and energy efficient

construction. The complex global issues of climate change and scarcity of resources

is addressed to transnational cooperation of students on the key topics of urban

planning and construction. The environmental relevance of this issue is illustrated

by the urban and building-related consumptions. Cities use up to 80% of the global

energy consumption, while the existing buildings alone causes about 40% of all

carbon dioxide emissions.

The summer school deals with this problem in a particular way. High level of know-

ledge and creative work in intercultural teams composed encourage you to find

innovative solutions to the urgent social tasks, this is cross-linked to both the urban

as seen on architectural design processing levels. Through intercultural exchange

between students and universities, an intensive knowledge and experience transfer

is stimulated. Expected are novel design, constructive and technical concepts for en-

vironmental friendly constructions and sustainable urban developments, across all

countries and climatic zones. The participating universities are selected according

to global and large cultural differences, thereby providing a high degree of innova-

tion and knowledge gained in the work of the students, teachers and researchers is

expected.

The results of each summer school are summarized by the organizer in bilingual

documentations and made available to all participants. They shall also be made

available to the public via technical papers.

international exchange and networking

10

11

participants 2015

12

participants 2015

The summer school is organized and represented

by the Department of Architecture at the Technical

University of Darmstadt

Design and Sustainable Building Unit

Prof. Christoph Kuhn

Design and Technology Unit

Prof. Anett-Maud Joppien

Energy Efficient Building Design Unit

Prof. Manfred Hegger

13

Professors and students from the following

international universities are taking part in the

summer school 2015 „suffi ciency strategies in

urban architecture“:

Univeritas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia

Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning

Dr.Ir. Martinus Bambang Susetyarto, MT

ISCTE – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Por-

tugal

Faculty of Architecture and Regional Planning

Mrs. Teresa Madeira da Silva

Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de

Strasbourg, France

School of Architecture and Planning

Mr. Guillaume Delemazure

Escola da Cidade, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism

Mr. Sebastian Beck

Along with students from the listed universities,

we are pleased to welcome other participants

from Italy, China, Pakistan and Germany.

14

SAN DIEGO, USA

Woodbury University

QUERETARO, MEXICO

IT Monterrey

BARCELONA, SPAIN

LISBON, PORTUGAL

ISCTE

STRASBOURG, FRANCE

INSA Strasbourg

VANCOUVER, CANADA

MUNICH, GERMANY

TU München

COLOGNE, GERMANYCOLOGNE, GERMANY

SAO PAULO, BRAZIL

Escola da Cidade

DARMSTADT

STUTTGART, GERMANYSTUTTGART, GERMANYSTUTTGART, GERMANYSTUTTGART, GERMANYSTUTTGART, GERMANY VIENNA, AUSTRIAVIENNA, AUSTRIAVIENNA, AUSTRIAVIENNA, AUSTRIA

TU WIENTU WIENTU WIEN

15

CAIRO, EGYPT

American University in Cairo

AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND

University of Auckland

GALATI, RUMANIA

SHANGHAI, CHINA

Tongji University

TEHERAN, IRAN

JAKARTA, INDONESIA

Univeritas Trisakti

Participants 2015

Participants 2014

Participants 2013

16

Yasmin Amalina (id), Zahra Rizkia Andini (id), Susana André (pr),

Gabriela Atanasova (de), Sara Baião (pr), Laura Bellotti (br), Pierre Caraud (fr),

Gabriel Cesar da Costa e Silva (br), Laura Levi Costa Sousa (br),

Reza Mahdi Daniswara (id), Stefano Dastoli (de), Frederico Duff de Azevedo (br),

Elvia Erosa (mx), Nur Evitasari (id), Joao Pedro Francisco (pr), Giovanni Frazzatto

(br), Pedro Gaspar (pr), Julia Godinho Vaz (br), Amalda Alisia Hutasuhut (id),

Bo Jin (de), Juliana Katayama (br), Camille Madinier (fr), Camila Moraes (br), Har-

ly Valiant Noviano (id), Veronika Pöschel (de), Nabila Antari Prasanti (id),

Finsa Hutama Putra (id), Joana Rodrigues (pr), Leticia Sampaio Encinas (br),

Carolina Simao (br), Sabrina Sinelli Sobreiro (br), Alifa Imama Syahnovy (id),

Chen Tao (pr), Anak Agung Sagung Ayu Tirta (id), Gladys Vasquez (gu),

Adha Montpelierina Viala (id), Mutiara Pudya Wihertinindia (id), Mindy Zhang (ch)

Manfred Hegger (de, prof.), Anett-Maud Joppien (de, prof.), Christoph Kuhn (de,

prof.), Christoph Drebes (de, aca.+org.), Mieke Pfarr-Harfst (de, aca.+org.),

Steffen Wurzbacher (de, aca.+org.), Christian Herbrik (de, org.), Verena Kreß (de,

org.), Lazar Tsankov (de, org.), Sebastian Beck (br, aca.), Guillaume Delemazure (fr,

aca.), Pedro Mendes (pr, aca.), Martinus Bambang Susetyarto (id, aca.),

Teresa Silva (pr, prof.)

participants & team 2015

17

18

19

programsufficiency strategies urban architecture, summer school 2015

20th July - 31th July 2015

20

overview program

sat25/07/2015

mon20/07/2015

sun19/07/2015

wed22/07/2015

tue21/07/2015

thu23/07/2015

fri24/07/2015

09 am

10 am

11 am

12 am

01 pm

02 pm

03 pm

04 pm

05 pm

06 pm

07 pm

08 pm

09 pm

arrival in darmstadt

LectureM. Hegger excursion

Southern Germany

Frankfurt BBQ

LectureA. Steff en

LectureK. Daniels

workshop

workshop

excursion Frankfurt

LectureChr. Kuhn

LectureM. Knöll

LectureS. Thoma

release of excercise workshop

site inves-tigation

crit

get together

interna-tional input

interna-tional

evening

LectureP. Gotsch

workshop

LectureL. Piccon

workshop workshop

welcome

21

mon27/07/2015

sun26/07/2015

sat01/08/2015

fri31/07/2015

thu30/07/2015

tue28/07/2015

wed29/07/2015

09 am

10 am

11 am

12 am

01 pm

02 pm

03 pm

04 pm

05 pm

06 pm

07 pm

08 pm

09 pm

workshop

departure from

darmstadt

excursion Southern Germany

‚fi nissage‘

fi nalpresenta-

tion

LecturesSD HousesA. Joppien M. ObiolisS. Fiedler

Session

Young Researchers

workshop

discussion

workshop

workshop

crit

workshopexcursion Southern Germany

22

23

impressions

24

welcoming / excursion FFM / international evening

25

lectures

26

workshop

27

crit & presentations

28

excursion SW Germany

29

excursion SW Germany

30

miscellaneous impressions

31

final evening

32

33

lecturers

34

lecturers

Due to the fact that the Department of Prof. Kuhn at the Technical University of Darmstadt is under develo-pement, Prof. Kuhn will not be presenting past research activities. He will however, through his position as pro-fessor for Sustainable Building and Integrated Design at KIT, give an insightful presentation towards these topics.


The research of Prof. Hegger and his Department focuses on the topics of energy, material, space and process. They investigate areas in eco-balance, criteria in sustainability in competitions, life-cycle considerations, energy and its sustainability, sustainable product development as well as investigating renewable energy concepts in urban and settlement areas.



Prof. Joppien´s teaching aims at conveying fundamental knowledge within the field of building technology. That incorporates specific ecological, economical and sustaina-ble aspects as an integral part of the design process. Since the fundamental factors of the users well being within a building depend upon the buildings micro climate, its ventilation, lighting and the contact to the outside, as well as the useage of appropriate technologies, the goal is to encorporate and strenghten these parameters at an early stage, via an integrated design process.

35

Prof. Dr. Martin Knöll is architect and head of the re-search group “Urban Health Games” at TU Darmstadt. Knöll investigates evidence-based and health-oriented design with a focus on promoting physical activity, so-cial interaction, inclusivity and mental health in urban environments. Associated to the Design and Urban Deve-lopment Unit, he closely interacts with computer scien-tists and health experts to develop context-sensitive me-dia and mobile sensors that enable research into urban health and improve planning processes.

Prof. Dr. Martin Knöll

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Peter Gotsch is an Associate Professor for International Cooperation in Urban Development at the TU Darmstadt. He is a researcher and practitioner and a registered architect focusing on questions of urban deve-lopment and design in a global context since 18 years. His current studies focuses on strategies for better and safer neighbourhoods and public spaces, on privately developed new towns, on urban strategies for refugees an on bridging the gap between research and practice towards sustainable urban development.

Professor Klaus Daniels is currently the Managing Direc-tor of HL-Technik Engineering GmbH, previously he was a Professor at the Technical University of Darmstadt, ac-ting as chair of the ,,Design and Building Services‘‘. A po-sition which he also held at the ETH Zürich for 14 years, from 1991 - 2006. He specialises in Building Skin Tech-nologies and is as equally renown in Sustainable energy concepts, utilising renewables such as wind power, solar energy, bio gas and bio oil driven CHP, as well as heat pumps and soil energy.

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Peter Gotsch

Prof. Klaus Daniels

36

lecturers

Müller Sigrist Architects was founded 2001 by the ar-chitects Pascal Müller and Peter Sigrist. With 30 emplo-yees it is now managed by Pascal Müller and Samuel Thoma. Pascal Müller studied at the ETH Zurich and col-laborated in the offices of Gigon Guyer Architects and Stu-dio Libeskind. 2010 - 2012 he was professor at the Bern University of Applied Sciences for Architecture, Wood and Civil Engineering. Samuel Thoma studied at the AA Architectural Association in London and since 2006 he is partner in the office of Müller Sigrist Architects.

Sabine Djahanschah is the head of the unit “Architecture and Construction” at the Deutsche Bundesstiftung Um-welt. She worked at Gerkan, Marg und Partner and since 2003 she is part of the jury for the German “Holzbau-preis”. In 2007, she helped work on the Energy Atlas and is, since 2010, a member of the International Advisory Boards. She did her Master’s in Building Physics at the TU Stuttgart and is a member of the BMVBS (group of experts of urban preservation).

Samuel Thoma

Sabine Djahanschah

Founder and partner in werk.um architects in 1995.Planning and project development, initiation, co-organizing of 1st sufficiency-congress 2014 in Darm-stadt. Workshops, essays, lectures on sufficiency.

A less on resource consumption firstly requires moti-vated users. So far there are hardly any of them. If it is possible though to provide the benefits of resource consumption differently, a more gentle and less harm-ful lifestyle shall be achievable.

Dipl. -Ing Arne Steffen

37

Sebastian Fiedler studied Architecture at the TU Mu-nich and graduated in 2004. After working for different practices in the field of energy efficient architecture he worked as a researcher at the HFT Stuttgart from 2006 to 2010 and became general manager of the „Centre of Sustainable Energy Technology in 2007. From 2008 to 2010 he was project manager of the HFT Stuttgart team for the Solar Decathlon Europe 2010. From 2010 to 2014 he taught „Energy Efficient Buidling Design“ at the FH Frankfurt and was project director for the SD 2014.

Sebastian Fiedler

Guillaume Delemazure

3838

designsuffi ciency strategies in urban architecture

39

design workshop

40

The compact city as ideal type of a city of short distances source: Gunßner, Christoph: Energiesparsiedlungen, München 2000, S.25

This year’s summer school design workshop „sufficiency strategies in urban architec-

ture“ focuses on a sustainable densification of a typical „European City“ Block in

Frankfurt. The building site is part of an existing „Gründerzeit“ structure which was

built at the End of 19th century. The block itself is situated at the border between

a living and an industrial area. Within this tension a strong model for future urban

living is to be designed.

The design proposal should conceptually and spatially integrate sufficiency strate-

gies into architecture. Housing hereby is an essential program. This utility is to be

combined with another public function needed at that specific plot.

The goal is to incorporate knowledge gathered from expert lectures and exercises

into the design. It is important to develop a conclusive method of working within in-

ternational and interdisciplinary teams in which the complex demands of the design

are met and collated to form a homogeneous concept. Challenges due to barriers

such as language, architectural approach and cultural differences are expected and

are to be handled accordingly.

Architectural concepts must, aside from the creative core task of creating spatial

quality, take issues in terms of CO2 emission, improving micro-climatic effects and

the use of natural resources into consideration. New methods and frameworks of

sustainable building should not be viewed as an inhibitant of the existing architec-

tural design process but as creative potential that enriches it.

introduction

41

development of the energy demand in Germany after 1945source: Hegger et al: Aktivhaus, München 2013, S.64

design workshop

42

development of the energy demand in Germany after 1945source: Hegger et al: Aktivhaus, München 2013, S.64

The building sector in germany had been focused on the increase of energy-efficient

urban and building structures. Simultainiously different changes in the attitude to-

wards social needs negated the efforts of reducing the on the whole energy de-

mands.

This leads to the realization to start to widen the view of acting sustainable by

increasing the consideration of the other layers of sustainability. By developing stra-

tegies for robustly designed consistent and sufficient structures the goal is aimed

to develop towards a sustainable form of society which pursues a holistic view of

sustainability.

The development is more and more focused in european discussions about further

sustainable development where the task of this year summer school shall find diffe-

rent approaches how to react sufficiently in a dense urban surrounding.

energy demand & need of sufficiency strategies

43

44

primary energy consumption per country in relation to the aim of the 2.000 Watt society source: Hegger et al: Aktivhaus, München 2013, S.99

Therefor is a need to rethink established standards and concepts to develop a sus-

tainable and trendsetting builded surrounding. The international exchange about

the question of how we want to live, work and react in future forms a principal key

need.

The summer school wants to include different points of view on that international

level and want to make a contribution to the current debate.

There are first general signs being picked up to anchor sufficiency into existing pro-

cesses of building and urban planning:

• Is the way we life and behave adapted to efficient building concepts?

• How much individual space is needed for the different kind of life modells and

increasing inteaction between working and living?

• How much building facilities are needed? Which equipment is useful? What is

a abundance of equiption

• Things shall be converted and reused, the question is how can it be reacted?

• How much induvidual mobility is needed?

• Shall we share and exchange things to reduce our demands? What does it mean

for society?

What is your opinion about sufficiency? Find new answers to the question of how a

sufficient housing could look like?

45

design workshop

46

step A: site analysis

step D: architectural design

design workshop

step B: urban concept

step C: programmatic concept

conclusion

conclusion

conclusion

The design task is structured in four steps. Each step is related to the others and

has to be developed carefully. In order to the short time frame it is necessary to

successed each step in time.

Step A (site analysis) should be finished within the first two days of the design work-

shop. Step B (urban concept) and step C (programmatic concept) are to be built on

the results of the analysis (step A). The urban and programmatic concept are the

basis for the following architectural design. Therefore thewe two steps should be

completed untill the third day of the design workshop. They are to be developed

with an overlapping of step A.

A first milestone is defined by the crit 1 on Friday 24th. A first architectural propo-

sal should be showen by models, diagrams, sketches of floorplans and sections. An

advanced development to this stage is essential for a sucessfull completion of the

whole workshop.

After the excursion two days remain to further develop the architectural design. A

second milestone is defined by crit 2. This second crit will be hold on wednesday.

After that, all design teams should start finalizing the overall project. This includes

layout and presentation.

Both Subtasks A and B are tackled within a group. Each group must organize itself

accordingly in order to have a goal-oriented focus and to make efficient use of time.

In both Subtasks, an intensive analysis must be made in order to improve the under-

standing of the task and the area context. This will be the basis to work with during

the design. The concept and design outcome are to be portrayed in appropriate me-

thods of presentation (floor plans, sections, views, sketches, diagrams, etc.).

It is essential that the development of all parts of the urban and architectural con-

cept correlate with the results of the analysis and the followed sufficiency strategies.

time table

47

48

site

49

design workshop

50

site

51

photos: Christoph Drebes

Sonnemannstraße

Auszug aus dem InformationssystemDieser Auszug dient lediglich zu Informationszwecken und ist keine rechtsverbindliche Auskunft.

17.07.20151 : 5000

Datum:Maßstab:

© Stadtvermessungsamt Frankfurt am Main © Hessische Verwaltung für Bodenmanagment und Geoinformation

design workshopdesign workshop

52

Sonnemannstraße


17.07.20151 : 5000

Datum:Maßstab:


sitesite

53

design workshop

54

Sonnemannstraße 5960314 Frankfurt am Main

site

55

design workshop

56

1.5m

15.5m

12.7m

9.9m

7.1m

4.3m

18.8m

1.4m

19.9m

16.2m

12.5m

8.8m

5.1m


57

18.8m7.74°19.9m

design workshop

58

18.8m7.74°19.9m


59

60photos: Christoph Drebes


61

design workshop

62photos: Christoph Drebes

The first step is to perform a systematic analysis of the site and it‘s surrounding. De-

signers should identify specific characters of the situation and it‘s individual „logic‘.

A solid analysis is the basis of the following design task.

The analysis is vital in order to understand the original design concept and to iden-

tify programmatic, spatial and energy development potential (lack of use, new pro-

grams, etc.)

Hereby, all aspects of the site from it’s urban environment to programmatic aspects

and building details must be taken into consideration. The following topics are to

be analyzed:

• existing spatial concept and program of the urban context

• identifying potential lacks of programs and utilities

• specific building types

• inner and outer access systems

• typical materials that define this place

• characters of open and green spaces

• climatic conditions (course of the sun, temperature curve, precipitation,

humidity

To be submitted:

• Explanation of the main site characters, existing and missing programms, spaci-

al situations and main typologies

• Mass model of the site including the direct surroundings

Materials:

sketches, diagrams, text, model, collages, fotos, videos, etc.


63

different city types: mega block, block, back-to-back line structure, equal line structuresource: Gunßner, Christoph: Energiesparsiedlungen, München 2000, S.22

64

step B:urban design concept

65

Sonnemannstraße


17.07.20151 : 5000

Datum:Maßstab:


design workshop

source: GoogleEarth

66

The second step is to create an urban design concept using the knowledge gathered

during the analysis. Here, possible solutions in terms of integrating a new building

structure by increasing the programmatic qualities of the quartier and „fi nishing“

the block must be found.

The amount of structural densifi cation should be planned according to each indivi-

dual analysis. Also the position and evaluation of a new volume had to be designed

carefully and should show its compatibility with the existing area through a model.

The proposed new buildings must cohere with the overall logic of the context.

The Design of step B must continuously be developed parallel to step C to check and

ensure a homogeneous overall concept.

The new proposed building ist to be shown in the model and in the site plan (view).

They must however have typological diversity between existing and new structures.

As design method the production of a series of mass models are strongly recommen-

ded. Therefore we propose to develop variations within a volume study.

The base of the concept is a suffi ciency strategy for cities that follow an interior

instead of exterior developments. This must determine the unique and strong cha-

racteristic of the typical „Gründerzeit“ Block.

The following topics are to be focused on:

• Which density is acceptable for that place?

• Elevation (concentration, visibility, compacness, hight, etc.) of new volumes,

• How do proposed volumes fi t into the existing spacial situation? How do exis-

ting and new structures come together?

• access of existing and new structures

• priorities of open spaces (public, semi public, private)

step B: urban design concept

67

68

main programs within a city - ideal of separatinc functions after 1945;source: Gunßner, Christoph: Energiesparsiedlungen, München 2000, S.24

step C:programmatic concept

69

design workshop

70

fl exibility in spacesource: p.a. / Steff en Wurzbacher

A programmatic concept is to be developed in addition to perceptions of the site

analysis. Program and Volume directy interact and infl uence themselves. Therefore

both steps have to be solved simultaneously.

The main program of the design task is innovative housing. In addition to that a

second program has to be integrated. Type and size of the additional program is to

be argued from the results of the site analysis (step A). This „public“ utility should

create a benefi t for the surrounding quarter. The housing typology is to be designed

in connection to suffi ciency strategies told during the daily expert lectures.

Herby following questions and topics should be in focus:

• How will daily routines of children, young and old adults be organized in the

future? How does future housing and working look like?

• What spacial demands result out of daily routines of inhabitants?

• Which utilities can be combined, left over or reorganized?

• Flexibility and neutrality as main character of space

• Which additional programs create benefi ts for the surrounding quarter?

• How are these two programs structuraly organized? How do they interact?

To be submitted:

• Explanation of the organization of planned programs

• Description of chosen suffi ciency strategies

• Description of the interaction between housing and additional program

• Description of the main character of the developed program

Materials:

sketches, diagrams, drawings, text, collages, fotos, videos, etc.

step C: programmatic concept

71

72

„Frankfurt Kitchen“ from Ernst May (1926) as first example of space efficient designsource: Förster, Wolfgang: Housing in the 20th and 21st Centuries; München / Berlin / London / New York 2006, S.39

step D:architectural design

73

design workshop

74

source: Boesiger; Girsberger: Le Corbusier 1910-65, Zürich 1986

The last and main step is to develop an architectural design proposal based on the

previously defined urban and programmatic concepts. Hereby all essential parts of

the building need to be designed and shown in plans, sections and elevations.

One representative Housing Unit is to be further developed. The main aspects of

chosen sufficiency strategies should be integrated in this spacial translation.

Despite to the design of the buildingstructure a second focus concentrates on the

facade. This element defines the transition betwen inside and outside as well as a

climatic zones. In addition to a visual character main functions (construction, insu-

lation, ventilation, daylight, solar energy gains, etc.) should be qualitatively descri-

bed. Facade concepts sould show passive and active energy strategies. In addidion to

that potential energetic zones sould interact with the developed sufficiency concepts

within the spacial figure.

Hereby the following topics should be focused on:

• How are the housing units structured? Are there zones and hierarchies?

• That is the spacial structure of the building?

• What kind of construction and construction principle is to be chosen?

• What kind of materials are used inside?

• What main energy demands are to be expected? How is the energy supply sol-

ved?

• How ist the facade structured?

• What kind of character does the new building have?

• What kind of materials are used in the facade?


75

76

frankfurt,historic development & topography

77

design workshop

7819th century: „railroad city“

14th - 17th century „defence installations as limitation“

first settlements „compact medieval city“

frankfurt, historic development & topography

79

historic development of Frankfurtsource: Frankfurt am Main: Stadtentwicklung und Plaungsgeschichte seit 1945, Frankfurt 1996; S.19

1947 - begin of the „sprawl“

design workshop

80

Frankfurt city centre in 1945source: Frankfurt am Main: Stadtentwicklung und Plaungsgeschichte seit 1945, Frankfurt 1996; S.19


81

morphologythe inner city is mainly sealed with a mini-mum of green spaces (l.)the typical hight of the densed parts is bet-ween 20 to 24 metres (r.)

design workshop

82

source: Mayer, Fritsch, Matzarakis: Ausarbeitung von Karten der stadtklimarele-vanten Luftleitmahnen in Frankfurt am Main, Freiburg 1994, S. 23


83


topographyCity centre + Sachsenhausen: situation on both sides of the river MainNorth: hills of the TaunusSouth: hills of the Odenwald

design workshop

84



85


86

Frankfurt, climatic situation

87

design workshop

88LE G E N D

T e mpe ra ture

R e l.H umidity

Dire ct S ola r

Di�us e S ola rW ind S pe e d C loud C ove r

C omfort: T he rma l N e utra lity

J a n F e b Ma r Apr Ma y J un J ul Aug S e p Oct N ov De c

-10 0.0k

0 0.2k

10 0.4k

20 0.6k

30 0.8k

40 1.0k

°C W /m²MON T H LY DIU R N AL AV E R AG E S - F R AN KF U R T AM MAIN , DE U

(ecotect)

N15°

30°

45°

60°

75°

90°

105°

120°

135°

150°

165°180°

195°

210°

225°

240°

255°

270°

285°

300°

315°

330°

345°

10°

20°

30°

40°

50°

60°

70°

80°

9

1011121314

15

16

1s t J a n

1s t F e b

1s t Ma r

1s t Apr

1s t Ma y

1s t J un1s t J ul

1s t Aug

1s t S e p

1s t Oct

1s t N ov

1s t De c

S tereographic DiagramLoca tion: F R AN KF U R T AM MAIN , DE U

(ecotect)

solar radiationsource: EcoTect

average monthly temperaturesource: EcoTect


89

N15°

30°

45°

60°

75°

90°

105°

120°

135°

150°

165°180°

195°

210°

225°

240°

255°

270°

285°

300°

315°

330°

345°

10°

20°

30°

40°

50°

60°

70°

80°

9

1011121314

15

16

1s t J a n

1s t F e b

1s t Ma r

1s t Apr

1s t Ma y

1s t J un1s t J ul

1s t Aug

1s t S e p

1s t Oct

1s t N ov

1s t De c

S tereographic DiagramLoca tion: F R AN KF U R T AM MAIN , DE U

(ecotect)sun elevation chartsource: EcoTect

design workshop

90

Click on Design Strategy to select or deselect. NextBack

JANUARY through DECEMBERDESIGN STRATEGIES:7.9% 1 Comfort(694 hrs)

2 Sun Shading of Windows(0 hrs)3 High Thermal Mass(0 hrs)4 High Thermal Mass Night Flushed(0 hrs)5 Direct Evaporative Cooling(0 hrs)6 Two-Stage Evaporative Cooling(0 hrs)7 Natural Ventilation Cooling(0 hrs)8 Fan-Forced Ventilation Cooling(0 hrs)9 Internal Heat Gain(0 hrs)

10 Passive Solar Direct Gain Low Mass(0 hrs)11 Passive Solar Direct Gain High Mass(0 hrs)12 Wind Protection of Outdoor Spaces(0 hrs)13 Humidification Only(0 hrs)14 Dehumidification Only(0 hrs)15 Cooling, add Dehumidfication if needed(0 hrs)16 Heating, add Humidification if needed(0 hrs)

7.9% Comfortable Hours using Selected Strategies (694 out of 8760 hrs)

Comfort Zones show: Summer clothing on right, Winter clothing on left.

-10-10-5-5

00

55

1010

1515

2020

2525DEG. CTEMPERATUREWET-BULB

3030

3535

4040

90%

DEW

PO

INT

TEM

PERA

TURE

, DEG

. C

11

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40DRY-BULB TEMPERATURE, DEG. C

.004

.008

.012

.016

.020

.024

.028

HU

MID

ITY

RATI

O

100% 80%RELATIVE HUMIDITYL E G E N DCOMFORT INDOORS

8% COMFORTABLE92% NOT COMFORTABLE

Show Best set of Design StrategiesDisplay Design Strategies

Fit to Data -10 to 40 °C

TEMPERATURE RANGE:

Next Hour1 a.m.One Hour

Next Day 1One Day

Next MonthJANOne Month

DECthroughJAN

Selected MonthsAll Months

midnightthrough1 a.m.

Selected HoursAll Hours

Daily Min/MaxHourly

COMFORT INDOORSPLOT:

IWEC Data 106370 WMO Station Number, Elevation 113 mData Source: 50.05° North, 8.6° East, Time Zone from Greenwich 1Latitude/Longitude: FRANKFURT AM MAIN, -, DEULOCATION:

ASHRAE Standard 55-2004 using PMVPSYCHROMETRIC CHART

NOR TH15°

30°

45°

60°

75°

EAST

105°

120°

135°

150°

165°SOUTH

195°

210°

225°

240°

255°

WEST

285°

300°

315°

330°

345°

0.4%0.9%1.3%

2.1%

1.7%

0.8%

1.0%0.6%1.4%0.8%

0.5%

0.4%

0.3%

0.1%

0.2%0.2%

1.1%2.5%

3.5%

3.5%

2.9%

0.8%

0.9%

1.1%3.1%

3.0%

2.3%

1.3%

0.9%

0.7%

0.6%

0.6%

1.5%2.4%

1.7%

0.7%

0.8%

0.3%

0.1%

0.5%2.5%

4.5%

2.8%

1.4%

1.7%

1.0%

0.9%

0.5%

0.6%1.6%

0.8%

0.3%

0.3%

0.1%

0.0%

0.1%1.1%

2.5%

1.4%

0.9%

1.0%

0.6%

0.4%

0.3%

0.4%1.4%

0.7%

0.3%

0.0%

0.1%

0.0%1.2%

2.3%

2.1%

1.4%

1.1%

0.3%

0.2%

0.2%

0.0%

0.6%

0.5%

0.0%

0.0%

0.5%

1.2%

1.5%

1.1%

0.6%

0.2%

0.0%

0.1%

0.0%

0.1%

0.2%

0.0%

0.2%

0.4%

0.7%

0.4%

0.2%

0.1%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.1%

0.3%

0.6%

0.3%

0.3%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.1%

0.3%

0.2%

0.1%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.1%

10 km/h

20 km/h

30 km/h

40 km/h

50 km/h hrs

386+

347

308

270

231

193

154

115

77

<38

P re va iling W indsWind F requency (H rs )Loca tion: F R AN KF U R T AM MAIN , DE U (50.0°, 8.6°)Da te : 1s t J a nua ry - 31s t De ce mbe rT ime : 00:00 - 24:00© Weather Tool

[Dura tion s hown a s pe rce nta ge s ]

(ecotect)psychrometric chartsource: Climate Consultant


91

NOR TH15°

30°

45°

60°

75°

EAST

105°

120°

135°

150°

165°SOUTH

195°

210°

225°

240°

255°

WEST

285°

300°

315°

330°

345°

0.4%0.9%1.3%

2.1%

1.7%

0.8%

1.0%0.6%1.4%0.8%

0.5%

0.4%

0.3%

0.1%

0.2%0.2%

1.1%2.5%

3.5%

3.5%

2.9%

0.8%

0.9%

1.1%3.1%

3.0%

2.3%

1.3%

0.9%

0.7%

0.6%

0.6%

1.5%2.4%

1.7%

0.7%

0.8%

0.3%

0.1%

0.5%2.5%

4.5%

2.8%

1.4%

1.7%

1.0%

0.9%

0.5%

0.6%1.6%

0.8%

0.3%

0.3%

0.1%

0.0%

0.1%1.1%

2.5%

1.4%

0.9%

1.0%

0.6%

0.4%

0.3%

0.4%1.4%

0.7%

0.3%

0.0%

0.1%

0.0%1.2%

2.3%

2.1%

1.4%

1.1%

0.3%

0.2%

0.2%

0.0%

0.6%

0.5%

0.0%

0.0%

0.5%

1.2%

1.5%

1.1%

0.6%

0.2%

0.0%

0.1%

0.0%

0.1%

0.2%

0.0%

0.2%

0.4%

0.7%

0.4%

0.2%

0.1%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.1%

0.3%

0.6%

0.3%

0.3%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.1%

0.3%

0.2%

0.1%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.1%

10 km/h

20 km/h

30 km/h

40 km/h

50 km/h hrs

386+

347

308

270

231

193

154

115

77

<38

P re va iling W indsWind F requency (H rs )Loca tion: F R AN KF U R T AM MAIN , DE U (50.0°, 8.6°)Da te : 1s t J a nua ry - 31s t De ce mbe rT ime : 00:00 - 24:00© Weather Tool

[Dura tion s hown a s pe rce nta ge s ]

(ecotect)wind rosesource: EcoTect

design workshop

92

F

F

F

F

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Flughafen

Sachsenhausen-S.

Schwanheim

Seckbach

Nied

Ostend

Bergen-Enkheim

Höchst

Niederursel

Bockenheim

Gallus

Harheim

Zeilsheim

Fechenheim

Griesheim

Sossenheim

Nieder-Erlenbach

Praunheim

Rödelheim

Unterliederbach

Sindlingen

Nieder-Eschbach

Kalbach-Riedberg

Oberrad

Niederrad

Ginnheim

Bornheim

Preungesheim

Berkersheim

Eschersheim

Sachsenhausen-N.

Dornbusch

Nordend-West

Eckenheim

Heddernheim

Westend-Süd

Gutleutviertel

Hausen

Frankfurter Berg

Bonames

Innenstadt

Nordend-OstWestend-Nord

Riederwald

Altstadt

Bahnhofsviertel

8,50

8,50

8,55

8,55

8,60

8,60

8,65

8,65

8,70

8,70

8,75

8,75

8,80

8,80

50,1

0

50,1

0

50,1

5

50,1

5

50,2

0

50,2

0

50,2

5

50,2

5

±0 2Kilometer

Luftleitbahnen (Main und Nidda)

Dynamische Wirkungsräume

F Regionale Windrichtung

' Hangabwinde

Verkehrswege

Gewässer

Klimaplanatlas Frankfurt am MainLegende

gnufutsniEgnubierhcseBemaNeirogetaK

Kaltluftentstehung Luftleitbahnen1

Kaltluftentstehung, Luftleitbahnen und Hangwinde

Acker, Wiesen mit geringer Rauhigkeit Sehr wichtig, erhalten und schützen

2Frischluft- und Kaltluftentstehung, Luftleitbahnen und Hangwinde

Wald, Flächen mit dichten Baumbestand ohne Emissionsquellen Acker Wiesen

Wichtig, erhalten und schützenLuftleitbahnen und Hangwinde ohne Emissionsquellen, Acker, Wiesen

3Mischklimate, Wirkung von Luftleitbahnen nachweisbar

Friedhof, Parks, Kleingärten, Aussiedlerhöfe, Spielplätze

Wichtige Ausgleichszonen aufgrund lokaler Zirkulationen, Zirkulationsrichtung beachten, Wärmespeicherung nicht erhöhenp g

4 Überwärmungspotential Siedlungsbereiche, Siedlungsränder Thermisch gefährdeter Bereich, Bebauung porös gestalten

5 Überwärmungsgebiet 1Dichte Bebauung mit wenig Vegetation (Blockrand)

Thermisch und lufthygienisch mit hohenDefiziten, Hitzestress steigend, Vegetations-schatten und Fassadenbegrünung fördern, Luftleitbahnen beachten

Thermisch und lufthygienisch mit sehr hohen

6 Überwärmungsgebiet 2 Stark verdichtete Innenstadtbereiche

Thermisch und lufthygienisch mit sehr hohenDefiziten, Hitzestress stark steigend, Be-schattungen im Außenraum fördern, Fassaden-und Dachisolationen, Oberflächenentsiegelungen

29.4.2009

KlimaplanatlasFrankfurt am Main

Fachgebiet UmweltmeteorologieFachbereich Architektur, Stadtplanung, Landschaftsplanung

Prof. Dr. Lutz KatzschnerDipl.-Ing. Sebastian KupskiDipl.-Ing. René Burghardt

U met

Leitfaden „Klimaplanatlas Frankfurt am Main“

Der Klimaplanatlas für die Stadt Frankfurt am Main beinhaltet die flächen-deckend analysierten Klimate (Klimatope), wie sie sich vor allem durch die verschiedenen Flächennutzungen geprägt darstellen. Die Datengrundlage der Flächennutzungen ist die Biotopkartierung aus dem Jahr 2006 und aktuelle Luftbilder aus dem Jahr 2009. Anhand dieser Daten, dem digitalen Höhenmo-dell und weiteren Flächeninformationen, konnten unterschiedliche Kriteriene-benen erstellt werden, die letzten Endes in einer dynamischen und einer ther-mischen Analyse abschlossen.

In aufeinanderfolgenden Arbeitsschritten wurden Verschneidungen mit unter-schiedlicher Gewichtung der einzelnen Analyseebenen vorgenommen und mit bereits bestehenden Informationen abgeglichen. Aus dieser komplexen Über-lagerung unterschiedlichster Sachinformationen konnten die klimatischen Funktionen im Stadtgebiet aggregiert und aufbereitet werden. Ergebnis ist der Klimaplanatlas mit 6 unterschiedlichen Bewertungskategorien (Potential-, Misch- und Belastungsklimate). An dieser Stelle sei vermerkt, dass die Flächendarstellung die thermische Komponente (Wärmebelastung) beurteilt, aber auch den dynamischen Aspekt beinhaltet. Die Darstellung der Luftleitflä-chen im Kartenwerk selbst dient der Orientierung und der Nachvollziehbarkeit, beinhaltet aber im eigentlichen Sinne keine weitergehende Informationen. Diese schraffierten Bereiche bilden das übergeordnete Zirkulationssystem im Frankfurter Stadtgebiet ab. Zusätzlich werden die Abflussrichtungen und Durchströmungsrichtungen anhand von Pfeilsymbolen angedeutet.

In der vorliegenden Untersuchung wurden Planungshinweise für die Bauleit-planung direkt in die Legende des Klimaplanatlas aufgenommen. Dies soll die Arbeit erleichtern, sowie eine übersichtliche und aussagekräftige Klassifizie-rung bereitstellen. Im vorliegenden Klimaplanatlas handelt es sich um eine GIS basierte Analyse, die aus technischer Sicht maßstabsunabhängig ist. Allerdings bilden die unterschiedlichen Klimatope stadtklimatische Gegeben-heiten (zusammengesetzt aus Geoanalysen und Generalisierungen) ab, die einen mittleren Anwendungsmaßstab von ca. 1:15.000 haben. Um Fehlinter-pretationen klimatischer Gegebenheiten und Übergangszonen zu vermeiden, ist es nicht zulässig, diesen Maßstab zu unterschreiten.

climatic situation:the inner city of Frankfurt is built in a compact high densed morpholo-gy. Narrow streets and a minimum of green spaces cause heat islands effects during summer times. Forecasts show rising risks of over hea-tings and reductions of ventilations.

The site of the design task is at the border between the ventilation corri-dor of the river Main and the densed inner city structures.


93

94

95

design 1 Pöschel, Viala, Vasquez

design 2 Baiao, Rodrigues, Cesar da Costa e Silva

design 3 Daniswara, Erosa, Duff de Azevedo

design 4 Simao, Andini, Jin

design 5 Wihertinindia, Sinelli Sobreiro, Prasanti

design 6 Noviano, Putra, Tao

design 7 Moraes, Dastoli, Caraud

design 8 Francisco, Evitasari, André

design 9 Syahnovy, Costa Sousa, Godinho Vaz

design 10 Amalina, Bellotti

design 11 Sampaio Encinas, Atanasova, Madinier

design 12 Tirta, Katayama, Zhang

design 13 Frazzatto, Gaspar, Hutasuhut

student worksresults of the design workshop

96

group

Gladys Vasquez (gu)

Veronika Pöschel (de)

Adha Viala (id)

9

‚sufficiency strategies in urban architecture’

sectionscale 1:50

design

5

‚sufficiency strategies in urban architecture’ design

ground floor plan mezzanine floor planscale 1:100 scale 1:100

7


3rd floor plan 4th floor planscale 1:100 scale 1:100

design

10


facade elevationscale 1:50

1.5

4.3

7.1

9.9

12.7

15.5

18.8

1.4

5.1

8.8

12.5

16.2

19.9

20.2

design

design project 1

9715

‚sufficiency strategies in urban architecture’ active solutions

14

‚sufficiency strategies in urban architecture’ passive solutions

2

‚sufficiency strategies in urban architecture’ site analysis

building levels land use patterns climatic conditions

open and green spaces traffic and noise building typologies

4

‚sufficiency strategies in urban architecture’ design

site planscale 1:500

3

‚sufficiency strategies in urban architecture’ program

concept

sectionspace layers shared space concept

3

‚sufficiency strategies in urban architecture’ program

concept

sectionspace layers shared space concept

98

group

Sara Baiao (pr)

Joana Rodrigues (pr)

Gabriel César (br)

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T


PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T

1st Floor Scale 1:100

2nd Floor Scale 1:100


PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T


PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T

1st Floor Scale 1:100

2nd Floor Scale 1:100


PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T


PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T

5th Floor Scale 1:100



PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T


PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T




PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T


PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T

South facade Scale 1:100

North Facade Scale 1:100


PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T

PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T


Section 1:100 Detail Scale 1:10

campus structure with a new center

section view

design project 2

99

PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T


100

group

Elvia Erosa (mex)

Frederico Duff (br)

Reza Daniswara (id)

divide and conquer

ground floor 2nd floor plan

4th floor plan 5th floor plan roof plan

3rd floor plan

SUFFICIENCY

BUILDING

NEIGHBORHOOD

design project 3

101

warm air circulation

concept sketch „Breathing“

facade detail

cold air circulation

circulation

102

group

Zahra Rizkia Andini (id)

Bo Jin (de)

Carolina Simao (br)

ground plan apartments plan

section B-B‘section A-A‘

design project 4

103activated atrium and added studio spaces

SITE ANALYSIS PROGRAM CONCEPT PROJECT SITE ANALYSIS PROGRAM CONCEPT PROJECT

104

group

Mutiara Wihertinindia (id)

Sabrina Sobreiro (br)

Nabila Antari Prasanti (id)

design project 5It shows the Thermal Mass in the summer and winter time and how heat is radiated

from the concrete slabs during the summer and in the winter how the heat is

retained, having a different effect on the ventilation.

105

restructured center and public transport system

106

group

Chen Tao (pr)

Finsa Hutama Putra (id)

Harly Valiant Noviano (id)

design project 6

107

S STRENGTH

W WEAKNESS

O OPORTUNITY

T THREAT

LANDUSE RESIDENTIAL FUNC. NEAR SCHOOL AND OFFICE BUILDING

TRAPEZE SHAPE (NON FUNC. SHAPE)

BUILD A RESIDENTIAL WITH PUBLIC ACTIVITIES

NOT MUCH SOCIAL ACTIVITIES AROUND SITE

CIRCULATION AND PARKING

290M FROM BUS STATION

NO PARKING AREA

ACTIVITY SUPPORT

NEAR OFFICE, BANK, COMMERCIAL BUILDING, SCHOOL

HAVE NO PLACE FOR PEOPLE TO GATHERING

SUSTAINABLE BUILDING WHICH CAN CONNECT, SUPPORT THE FUNC. AROUND THE SITE AND FULFILL OUR NEEDS

BUILDING AND MASSING

STRONG NEO-‐CLASSIC STYLE

CANT MAKE DIFFERENT STYLE BUILDING SMALL SITE MUCH SHADE IN WINTER

BUILDING THAT USE ENERGY OF THE SUN AND WIND

SUNLIGHT CAN GET REACH INSIDE THE BUILDING IN WINTER

OPEN SPACE HAVE OPEN SPACE IN THE BACK OF THE SITE

GROUND FLOOR SHOULD BE PLANNED FOR OPEN PUBLIC SPACE

MORE PUBLIC SPACE, LESS PRIVATE SPACE

SOCIAL PEOPLE CAN MEETS AT THE SHOP/ RESTORAN NEARBY THE SITE

NO PUBLIC OR SOCIAL ACTIVITIES

MAKE A PLACE WHICH CAN GATHER PEOPLE

PRESERVATION CONTEXT BUILDING CREATE CONTEXT AND SUSTAINABLE BUILDING STYLE

ANALISYS

S U F F I C I E N T

CONCEPT

SUFFICIENT

EFFICIENCY SUSTAINABLE

ENERGY ACTIVITY

RESOURCE

SHARING SPACE

PRODUCE

FUNCTIONALISM

REUSE

CONTEXT

GREEN

SUPPORTING FUNCTION

FRIENDLY SHAPE AND

FACADE

ACTIVITIES

PUBLIC

PRIVATE

SERVICE

SHARING ACTIVITIES

EAT & DRINK

WATCH TV

TALK TO PEOPLE

COOK

SLEEP

LAUNDRY

SHOWER, ETC

WORK

S I T E

SCHOOL GREEN AREAS SERVICE

STORES FOOD AREAS PUBLIC TRANSPORT

SITE

DATA

C L I M A T E

DATA

DIRECT SUNLIGHT FROM THE SOUTH

SUMMER C L I M A T E

DATA

LOW SUN. MUCH SHADE

WINTER

C L I M A T E

DATA

WIND BLOWN FROM SOUTH TO NORTH

108

THE TECHNOLOGY is based on concentraVng radiaVon and ultraviolet light without concentraVng heat, transform the radiaVon into electricity.

SUMMER

L

CONTEXT FACADE AND SHAPE

GLASS AND SOLAR COLORED FACADE

ENERGY SUFFICIENCY

GROUND FLOOR PLAN, SECTION AND FLEXIBLE PUBLIC SPACE

GROUND FLOOR PLAN TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN

WINTER GARDEN

WINTER GARDEN

21m

4.8m

4.8m

8.6m

WINTER

109

0

SUMMER

WINTER

WINTER

RESIDENTIAL

PUBLIC AND MULTIFUNCTION SPACE


RESIDENTIAL

WINTER GARDEN

context

RESIDENTIAL


context

RESIDENTIAL


110

group

Stefano Dastoli (de)

Camila Moraes (br)

Pierre Caraud (fr)

ground floor 1st floor 2 nd floor 4 th floor

ground fl oor 1st fl oor 2nd fl oor 4th fl oor

design project 7

111

east facade

1.5m

15.5m

12.7m

9.9m

7.1m

4.3m

18.8m

1.4m

19.9m

16.2m

12.5m

8.8m

5.1m

west facadewest facade east facade

112

OBERMAINANLAGE

U

double exposition;more light;crossed ventilation

glass boxmore light tointernal facades

glass boxmore light to internal facades

double expositionmore lightcrossed ventilation

113

student

studio

student family

family

business

114

group

Joao Pedro Francisco (pr)

Susana André (pr)

Nur Evitasari (id)

design project 8PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T

115


PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T


PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T


PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T


PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T


PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T


PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T


PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T


PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T

116

85 86

Fotos: Christoph Drebes

Sonnemannstraße


17.07.2015

1 : 5000

Datum:

Maßstab:


87 88

18.8m7.74°19.9m

SITE ANALYSIS

Potential Problems

Nearby places -Central European Bank -Restaurant-Nursery -Schools " -Frankfurt School of Finance & Management -Volkshochschule Frankfurt am Main -Bethmannschule " -Stifturg Dr.Hoch Konservatorium"-Paul – Arnsberg – Platz -Hotels -Shoppings -near the river

-Disorganization green space-Main Street has character of passage. There is no suggestion stop.""-Problem scale (there’s no transition between tower and houses scale.

Population -Different age -Different ethnicities

-Much housing for a few people "-Few people in large spaces

Accessibility -Proximity to stations S-Bahn and U-Bahn "-Bicycle path -Good accessibility for disabled

Activities

-Good sun exposure -Lack of shade

Natural and physical support

-Good amplitude "-Clearly boundary between the pedestrian, road and bicycles crossings.

-Lack of covered areas "-Little green spaces "-Lack of benchs

Weather

-Restaurants - Nursery"-Hotels -Shopping

-Lack of spaces that promote socialization

S.W.O.T-Paul – Arnsberg – Platz

S.W.O.T-Paul – Arnsberg – Platz -Hotels S.W.O.T-Hotels -Shoppings S.W.O.T-Shoppings -near the river S.W.O.T-near the river

PopulationS.W.O.TPopulation -Different age S.W.O.T-Different age -Different ethnicitiesS.W.O.T-Different ethnicities

-Much housing for a few S.W.O.T-Much housing for a few people S.W.O.Tpeople -FS.W.O.T-Few people in large spacesS.W.O.Tew people in large spaces

AccessibilityS.W.O.TAccessibility -Proximity to stations S-Bahn S.W.O.T-Proximity to stations S-Bahn and U-Bahn S.W.O.Tand U-Bahn -Bicycle path S.W.O.T-Bicycle path -Good accessibility for

S.W.O.T-Good accessibility for

S.W.O.TS.W.O.T

117

118

group

Alifa Imama Syahnovy (id)

Laura Costa Sousa (br)

Julia Godinho Vaz (br)

design project 9

ground floor

third floor

first floor

fourth floor

second floor

fifth floor

119

120

group

Laura Bellotti (br)

Yasmin Amalina (id)

design project 10

121

122

123

3

124

group

Leticia Encinas (br)

Gabriela Atanasova (de)

Camille Madinier (fr)

design project 11Programming

Facades

SouTH fACAde

modulAR uNITSSHARING AReAS

NoRTH fACAde

Facades

SouTH fACAde

modulAR uNITSSHARING AReAS

NoRTH fACAde

Floor Plans

WINTeR GARdeN

5TH flooRSTudy Room ANd lIbRARy

3Rd flooRCooKING ANd dINING Room

lIvING Room

2Nd flooRlIvING Room

GRouNd flooReNTRANCe

ReNT-A-bIKe ANd SToRAGe

4TH flooR

winter garden

Floor Plans

WINTeR GARdeN



lIvING Room




4TH flooR

third floor

Floor Plans

WINTeR GARdeN



lIvING Room




4TH flooR

fifth floor

Floor Plans

WINTeR GARdeN



lIvING Room




4TH flooRsecond floor

Floor Plans

WINTeR GARdeN



lIvING Room




4TH flooR

fourth floor

Floor Plans

WINTeR GARdeN



lIvING Room




4TH flooR

ground floor

125

3,00m

2,16 m

5,00 m

Stairs for duplex

Bed and furniture for the Studio

Boxes Units

dIffeReNT ASSembly

Uses

Transport

Bicycle stores in the area

9 min50 min

Concept

SHARING THe SpACe

Concept

modulARITy ANd flexIbIlITy ReNT-A-bIKe

126

group

Juliana Katayama (br)

Mindy Zhang (chn)

Anak Agung Tirta (id)

design project 12

GROUNDFLOOR1:100

GROUNDFLOOR1:100

1:100SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION

1:100SECTION 1

1:100

SECTION 11:100

south elevation

third fl oorground fl oor fi rst fl oor second and fourth fl oor

north elevation section section

127

29.7.2015

128

group

Giovanni Frazzatto (br)

Amalda Hutasuhut (id)

Pedro Gaspar (pr)

design project 13

PROGRAMMATIC CONCEPT


INTERACTION BETWEEN SPACES


FACADE

129

SITE ANALYSIS

CLIMATIC CONDITIONS

SITE ANALYSIS

LAND USE

SITE ANALYSIS

BUILDING FORM AND MASSING

URBAN DESIGN CONCEPT

TARGET MARKET: STUDENTS FRESH GRADUATES SINGLE OFFICE WORKERS SITE: HOUSING + SOCIAL SPACE & LIBRARY


OPEN SPACE DESIGN

OPEN SPACE DESIGN: TO BRING PEOPLE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD TOGETHER AS A SOCIAL/EVENT SPACE FOR STUDENTS IN NEARBY SCHOOLS


zoning

site analysisbuilding form an massing

urban design conceptopen space design

site analysisclimatic conditions

urban design conceptzoning

urban design concept

site analysisland use

130

131

imprint

TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT DARMSTADT

Department of Architektur




Christoph Drebes

Dr. Mieke Pfarr-Harfst

Ste� en Wurzbacher

phone +49 (0) 6151 162046

fax +49 (0) 6151 165247

[email protected]

Organisation:

Fachgebiet ee / enb 2015

Christoph Drebes, Dr. Mieke Pfarr-Harfst

Ste� en Wurzbacher,

Christian Herbrik, Verena Kreß, Lazar Tsankov

Documents

sufficiency strategies urban architecture · summer school 2015, documentation sufficiency urban architecture strategies summer school 2015. 2. 3 contents introduction 4 participants