1
HPLC (measurement apparatus) For chemical analysis of party drugs separation and detection of different constituents of mix- tures (active ingredients and fillers) is necessary. With the mobile lab we are using High Per- formance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) for the separation process. Our computer controlled HPLC-systems are equipped with DAD/UV-Vis Spectrometers (Diode Array Detector). Chemical analysis of “Party Drugs“ gives one of three possible results. The findings may be a single active agent, several active agents, or indeed no active agent. Reliable analysis of the substances in a sample cannot be achieved by means of a simple “quick test“ and is only possi- ble by the use of a complex measurement chain, as shown in the following basic diagram: Chemical analysis requirements HPLC-System Autosampler: HP-1100, Typ G1389A Pump: HP-1100, Binary Pump, Typ G1376A Detector: HP-1100, UV-Vis DAD-Detector, Typ G1315B Intrument control & integration ChemStation for LC 3D software HPLC- Conditions Stationary phase: Spherisorb 80-3 ODS-1 (Macherey-Nagel) Column dimension: 125 x 4.0 mm Hold-up volume: 1.002 ml Elutiontype: Gradient Eluent A 8,50 g ortho-phosphoric acid 85% + 280 µl hexylamine + purified water ad 1000 ml Eluent B 4,25 g ortho-phosphoric acid 85% + 140 µl hexylamine + 45,75 g purified water + 351 g acetonitrile Gradient program Time in min % A %B 0 – 2.5 95 5 2.5 – 9 95 - 60 5 - 40 9 – 13.5 60 40 13.5 – 14 60 - 95 40 - 5 14 – 16.5 90 5 Measuring parameters: Flowrate: 1 ml/min Pressure: 150 bar Injection volume: 2.5 μl Column temperature: 40 °C Detection: UV 198 nm Signal-Range: 190-400 nm Analytical method Health & Social Welfare Department State of Berne Office of the Cantonal Pharmacist Daniel Allemann, Hans Pauli, André Mürner, Hans-Jörg Helmlin, Samuel Steiner Dr. H.-J. Helmlin, MBA, Ph D Head Laboratory KAPA State of Berne Baltzerstrasse 5 CH-3012 Berne Switzerland e-mail: [email protected] Daniel Allemann Laboratory KAPA State of Berne Baltzerstrasse 5 CH-3012 Berne Switzerland e-mail: [email protected] Contacts: This arrangement applies to most modern chemical-analysis measurement systems. Update: 19.06.2010 Flow diagram Collaboration between the prevention-team and the laboratory Separation EDP- system Sample Input system Sample preparation Detector- system Measurement apparatus Analysis sequence Information stand at the party Sample- documentation HPLC- analysis Office Monbijouxstrasse 70 3007 Bern Database Result quantification calibration known active substance unknown active substance HPLC-analysis (mobile) Questionnaire (anonymous) Identification Measurement data Extraction Measuring/weighing Photography Coding Information Prevention message Pharmaceutical Control Laboratory Bern (within 1-4 days) Laboratory measurements GC/MS, LC/MS, IR Office Wasserwerkstrasse 17 8006 Zürich E-mail Telephone (Telephone) 10-15 mg Sample- material Sample Database Ravers Results SUBSTANCE TESTING ON THE DANCE FLOOR WITH A MOBILE HIGH-TECH LAB Introduction Since 1998 the mobile lab unit of the Office of the Cantonal Pharmacist (Health & Social Welfare Department, State of Berne, Switzerland) is testing so called „Party Drugs“ on the dance floor. At more than 100 events the team has tested over 1700 samples in cooperation with „Streetwork Zurich“ and „Contact Bern“. The mobile lab consists of four custom made subunits mounted in steel framed racks on wheels, one for weighing and documentation, one for sample prepara- tion and two with the equipment for che- mical analysis (HPLC-DAD). The lab is operated by two experienced technicians. Before analysis the in- terested customer is asked by the lab crew to fill out a questionnaire concerning information about the sample; thereafter every sample is digitally documented and characterized by physical appearance (form, weight, dimensions etc.). Report Analytical results are available within about 20 minutes. The computer prints the results of the analysis as a report. The report consists of 3 parts: The header, the chromatogram, and the results (including identification and quantification) Header: The header contains details like: File- name, sample-number, date of analysis, name of method etc. Chromatogram: The chromatogram is a graphic visualisa- tion of the separation process. Detected substances appear as “Peaks”. Results (identification and quantification): The system compares the area-value of an integrated Peak with the correspondi- ng calibration of the active substance in the specified methods. This automatic process gives us a precise quantification. Additionally it is possible to get the UV- spectra of the “Peak” and compare it with our specific UV- Spectra-library. Sample preparation: Due to the very sensitive analytical methods, only a representative part of the sample is used for further analysis. Sample preparation is quick and effective. The material is pulverised in a mor- tar and dissolved in methanol with the aid of an ultrasonic extractor. Bottles with mobile phase (solvent mix) HPLC- Pump (Part of the separation-system). This high-pressure pump delivers the solvent (with the dissolved sample) through the separating column to the detector. Autosampler The autosampler transfers the prepared sample from the vial into the measurement apparatus. HPLC-column The “central unit“ of the HPLC-system serves to separate dis- solved mixtures of substances into their constituents. Detector The chemical detector is positioned at the end of the column. It is the highly sensitive “eye“ of the mea- surement chain and records substances which absorb ultra-violet light when they pass trough the detector cell dissolved in the mobile phase. The detector provides two kinds of information about the mole- cules measured: their identity and their quantity. The whole process is continuously monitored with a computer system. Measurement signals are converted into graphical displays appearing on the computer screen. The two most important displays are the chromatogram and the UV- spectrum. The chromatogram is a representation of the separation process. The UV-spectrum is a characteristic constant for a particular substance. An internal standard is added as control. In most cases this extract still contains insoluble com- ponents, which must be filtered off before analysis. The clear sample solution obtained is trans- ferred into a sample vial. MDMA 44% Amphetamine 3% TMA-2 3% Scopolamine derivative 3% unknown 3% Ephedrine 13% Methamphetamine 3% Methylphenidate 3% Benzylpiperazine (A2) 3% TFMPP 3% TFMPP + Benzylpiperazine 3% 2C-B 3% Mephedrone 7% bk-MDMA (Methylone) 3% Mescaline 3% 80% 100% 60% 80% eight-%] 40% Amount [we 20% 0% 1 16 31 46 61 76 91 106 121 136 151 166 181 196 211 226 241 256 271 286 Sample Amphetamine Caffeine 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% unt [weight-%] 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 Cocaine Amou Sample Cocaine Moving average (period=20) 50 60 70 80 90 100 occurrence [%] Phenacetin Levamisole Lidocaine Diltiazem 0 10 20 30 40 50 2001-2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Frequency of o Year 'Additives' in cocaine samples (n = 211) Cocaine content in % (n = 211) Frequency of occurrence of different pharmaceutical substances in cocaine samples Variation of MDMA-dose in tablets (mg/tablet) (n = 644) Quantitative comparison Variation of Amphetamine and Caffeine amount in powders (in weight-%) 140 160 180 100 120 140 s [mg/tbl.] 60 80 MDMA dosis 20 40 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 Sample MDMA Moving average (period=50) Active ingredients [%] MDMA 52.55 Caffeine 22.92 Amphetamine 20.14 Cocaine 13.69 Phenacetin 7.04 mCPP 4.97 Levamisole 2.58 Domperidone 2.19 MDEA 1.94 no active ingredient 1.61 Lidocaine 1.61 MDA 1.23 unknown 1.16 Acetylsalicylic acid 1.10 Ketamine 1.10 Metoclopramide 1.10 2C-B 0.97 Methamphetamine 0.97 Paracetamol 0.65 Buflomedil 0.58 Ephedrine 0.58 p-Fluoroamphetamine 0.52 Heroin 0.45 Noscapine 0.45 Mescaline 0.39 Benzylpiperazine (A2) 0.26 Mephedrone 0.26 Cimetropium bromide 0.19 Diltiazem 0.19 Methylphenidate 0.19 Salicylic acid 0.19 TFMPP 0.19 Benzocaine 0.13 Ethcathinone 0.13 MDHOET 0.13 Procaine 0.13 TMA-2 0.13 2C-i 0.06 2C-D 0.06 Atropine (Hyoscyamine) 0.06 bk-MBDB (Butylone) 0.06 bk-MDMA (Methylone) 0.06 Clozapine 0.06 Desloratadine 0.06 Dextromethorphan (DXM) 0.06 Ergotamine 0.06 gamma-Butyrolactone 0.06 LSD 0.06 MDPV 0.06 Medicament 0.06 Methaqualone 0.06 Niacin (Vitamin) 0.06 N-Methylbenzylamin 0.06 N-Methylephedrine 0.06 Phenylacetone 0.06 Propyphenazone 0.06 related substance 0.06 Scopolamine 0.06 Scopolamine derivative 0.06 Sucrose octaacetate 0.06 Tadalafil 0.06 Capsules (n = 32) Amphetamine 20% MDMA 52% others 9% mCPP 5% Cocaine 14% Active ingredients (all samples) (n = 1549) Active ingredients (evolution time based) Galenical forms (all samples) (n = 1549) Galenical Forms (MDMA samples) (n = 793) 50 60 70 80 90 100 occurrence [%] MDMA mCPP MDEA MDA 2C-B 0 10 20 30 40 50 2001-2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Frequency of o Year 2C B Methamphetamine p-Fluoroamphetamine Tablets (n = 820) Powders (n = 694) Mean (n = 644) = 81.1 mg/tablet (n = 295) Frequency of occurrence Qualitative results 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2001-2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Frequency of occurrence [%] Year Tablet Powder Capsule Blotter Seeds liquid 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2001-2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Frequency of occurrence [%] Year Tablet Powder Capsule Blotter Seeds liquid 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 uency of occurrence [%] 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2001-2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Frequency of occurrence [%] Year Amphetamine Cocaine Ketamine MDMA 2C-B Methamphetamine Heroin Mescaline 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2001-2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 72 64 54 53 49 48 51 29 41 17 11 25 24 19 22 13 18 28 3 14 11 12 19 10 15 22 16 2 6 1 6 19 8 7 10 10 10 8 19 15 11 7 Frequency of occurrence [%] Year MDMA Amphetamine Cocaine mCPP others

SUBSTANCE TESTING ON THE DANCE FLOOR WITH A MOBILE … · Department, State of Berne, Switzerland) is testing so called „Party Drugs“ on the dance floor. At more than 100 events

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: SUBSTANCE TESTING ON THE DANCE FLOOR WITH A MOBILE … · Department, State of Berne, Switzerland) is testing so called „Party Drugs“ on the dance floor. At more than 100 events

HPLC (measurement apparatus)For chemical analysis of party drugs separation and detection of different constituents of mix-tures (active ingredients and fillers) is necessary. With the mobile lab we are using High Per-formance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) for the separation process. Our computer controlled HPLC-systems are equipped with DAD/UV-Vis Spectrometers (Diode Array Detector).

Chemical analysis of “Party Drugs“ gives one of three possible results. The findings may be a single active agent, several active agents, or indeed no active agent. Reliable analysis of the substances in a sample cannot be achieved by means of a simple “quick test“ and is only possi-ble by the use of a complex measurement chain, as shown in the following basic diagram:

Chemical analysis requirements

HPLC-SystemAutosampler: HP-1100, Typ G1389APump: HP-1100, Binary Pump, Typ G1376ADetector: HP-1100, UV-Vis DAD-Detector, Typ G1315BIntrument control & integration ChemStation for LC 3D softwareHPLC- ConditionsStationary phase: Spherisorb 80-3 ODS-1 (Macherey-Nagel)Column dimension: 125 x 4.0 mmHold-up volume: 1.002 mlElutiontype: GradientEluent A 8,50 g ortho-phosphoric acid 85% + 280 µl hexylamine + purified water ad 1000 ml Eluent B 4,25 g ortho-phosphoric acid 85% + 140 µl hexylamine + 45,75 g purified water + 351 g acetonitrile

Gradient programTime in min % A %B

0 – 2.5 95 52.5 – 9 95 - 60 5 - 409 – 13.5 60 40

13.5 – 14 60 - 95 40 - 514 – 16.5 90 5

Measuring parameters: Flowrate: 1 ml/minPressure: 150 barInjection volume: 2.5 μlColumn temperature: 40 °CDetection: UV 198 nmSignal-Range: 190-400 nm

Analytical method

Health & Social Welfare Department State of Berne

Office of the Cantonal Pharmacist

Daniel Allemann, Hans Pauli, André Mürner, Hans-Jörg Helmlin, Samuel Steiner

Dr. H.-J. Helmlin, MBA, Ph DHead Laboratory KAPAState of Berne Baltzerstrasse 5CH-3012 Berne Switzerlande-mail: [email protected]

Daniel AllemannLaboratory KAPAState of Berne Baltzerstrasse 5CH-3012 Berne Switzerlande-mail: [email protected]

Contacts: This arrangement applies to most modern chemical-analysis measurement systems.

Update: 19.06.2010

Flow diagramCollaboration between the prevention-team and the laboratory

Separation EDP-system

SampleInputsystem

Samplepreparation

Detector-system

Measurement apparatus

Analysis sequence

Information standat the party

Sample-documentation

HPLC-analysis

Office

Monbijouxstrasse 703007 Bern

Database

Result

quantification

calibration

known activesubstance

unknownactive

substance

HPLC-analysis (mobile)

Questionnaire (anonymous)

Identification

Measurement data

Extraction

Measuring/weighing

Photography

Coding

Information Prevention message

Pharmaceutical Control Laboratory Bern

(within 1-4 days)

Laboratory measurements

GC/MS, LC/MS, IR

Office

Wasserwerkstrasse 17 8006 Zürich

E-mail Telephone

(Telephone)

10-15 mg

Sample-material

Sample

Information stand at the party

HPLC-analysis

Database

Ravers

Results

SUBSTANCE TESTING ON THE DANCE FLOOR WITH A MOBILE HIGH-TECH LAB

IntroductionSince 1998 the mobile lab unit of the Office of the Cantonal Pharmacist (Health & Social Welfare Department, State of Berne, Switzerland) is testing so called „Party Drugs“ on the dance floor. At more than 100 events the team has tested over 1700 samples in cooperation with „Streetwork Zurich“ and „Contact Bern“.

The mobile lab consists of four custom made subunits mounted in steel framed racks on wheels, one for weighing and documentation, one for sample prepara-tion and two with the equipment for che-mical analysis (HPLC-DAD).The lab is operated by two experienced technicians. Before analysis the in-terested customer is asked by the lab crew to fill out a questionnaire concerning information about the sample; thereafter every sample is digitally documented and characterized by physical appearance (form, weight, dimensions etc.).

Report Analytical results are available within about 20 minutes. The computer prints the results of the analysis as a report. The report consists of 3 parts: The header, the chromatogram, and the results (including identification and quantification)

Header:The header contains details like: File-name, sample-number, date of analysis, name of method etc.

Chromatogram:The chromatogram is a graphic visualisa-tion of the separation process. Detected substances appear as “Peaks”.

Results (identification and quantification):The system compares the area-value of an integrated Peak with the correspondi-ng calibration of the active substance in the specified methods. This automatic process gives us a precise quantification.

Additionally it is possible to get the UV-spectra of the “Peak” and compare it with our specific UV- Spectra-library.

Sample preparation: Due to the very sensitive analytical methods, only a representative part of the sample is used for further analysis. Sample preparation is quick and effective. The material is pulverised in a mor-tar and dissolved in methanol with the aid of an ultrasonic extractor.

Bottles with mobile phase (solvent mix)

HPLC- Pump(Part of the separation-system). This high-pressure pump delivers the solvent (with the dissolved sample) through the separating column to the detector.

Autosampler The autosampler transfers the prepared sample from the vial into the measurement apparatus.

HPLC-columnThe “central unit“ of the HPLC-system serves to separate dis-solved mixtures of substances into their constituents.

DetectorThe chemical detector is positioned at the end of the column. It is the highly sensitive “eye“ of the mea-surement chain and records substances which absorb ultra-violet light when they pass trough the detector cell dissolved in the mobile phase. The detector provides two kinds of information about the mole-

cules measured: their identity and their quantity. The whole process is continuously monitored with a computer system. Measurement signals are converted into graphical displays appearing on the computer screen. The two most important displays are the chromatogram and the UV-spectrum. The chromatogram is a representation of the separation process. The UV-spectrum is a characteristic constant for a particular substance.

An internal standard is added as control. In most cases this extract still contains insoluble com-ponents, which must be filtered off before analysis. The clear sample solution obtained is trans-ferred into a sample vial.

MDMA44%

Amphetamine3%

TMA-23%

Scopolamine derivative

3%

unknown3%

Ephedrine13%

Methamphetamine3%

Methylphenidate3%Benzylpiperazine (A2)

3%

TFMPP3%

TFMPP + Benzylpiperazine

3%

2C-B3%

Mephedrone7%

bk-MDMA(Methylone)

3%

Mescaline3%

80%

100%

60%

80%

eig

ht-

%]

40%

Am

ou

nt

[we

20%

0%1 16 31 46 61 76 91 106 121 136 151 166 181 196 211 226 241 256 271 286

Sample

Amphetamine CaffeineAmphetamine Caffeine

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

un

t [w

eig

ht-

%]

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225

Co

cain

e A

mo

u

Sample

Cocaine Moving average (period=20)

50

60

70

80

90

100

occ

urr

ence

[%

]

PhenacetinLevamisoleLidocaineDiltiazem

0

10

20

30

40

50

2001-2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Fre

qu

ency

of

o

Year

'Additives' in cocaine samples (n = 211)Cocaine content in % (n = 211)

Frequency of occurrence of different pharmaceutical substances in cocaine samples

Variation of MDMA-dose in tablets (mg/tablet) (n = 644)

Quantitative comparison

Variation of Amphetamine and Caffeine amount in powders (in weight-%)

140

160

180

100

120

140

s [m

g/t

bl.]

60

80

MD

MA

do

sis

20

40

0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650

Sample

MDMA Moving average (period=50)g g (p )

Active ingredients [%]MDMA 52.55Caffeine 22.92Amphetamine 20.14Cocaine 13.69Phenacetin 7.04mCPP 4.97Levamisole 2.58Domperidone 2.19MDEA 1.94no active ingredient 1.61Lidocaine 1.61MDA 1.23unknown 1.16Acetylsalicylic acid 1.10Ketamine 1.10Metoclopramide 1.102C-B 0.97Methamphetamine 0.97Paracetamol 0.65Buflomedil 0.58Ephedrine 0.58p-Fluoroamphetamine 0.52Heroin 0.45Noscapine 0.45Mescaline 0.39Benzylpiperazine (A2) 0.26Mephedrone 0.26Cimetropium bromide 0.19pDiltiazem 0.19Methylphenidate 0.19Salicylic acid 0.19TFMPP 0.19Benzocaine 0.13Ethcathinone 0.13MDHOET 0.13Procaine 0.13TMA-2 0.132C-i 0.062C-D 0.06Atropine (Hyoscyamine) 0.06bk-MBDB (Butylone) 0.06bk-MDMA (Methylone) 0.06Clozapine 0.06Desloratadine 0.06Dextromethorphan (DXM) 0.06Ergotamine 0.06gamma-Butyrolactone 0.06LSD 0.06MDPV 0.06Medicament 0.06Methaqualone 0.06Niacin (Vitamin) 0.06N-Methylbenzylamin 0.06N-Methylephedrine 0.06Phenylacetone 0.06Propyphenazone 0.06related substance 0.06Scopolamine 0.06Scopolamine derivative 0.06Sucrose octaacetate 0.06Tadalafil 0.06

Capsules (n = 32)

Amphetamine20%

MDMA52%

others9%mCPP

5%

Cocaine14%

Active ingredients (all samples) (n = 1549)

Active ingredients (evolution time based)

Galenical forms (all samples) (n = 1549) Galenical Forms (MDMA samples) (n = 793)

50

60

70

80

90

100

occ

urr

ence

[%

]

MDMAmCPPMDEAMDA2C-B

0

10

20

30

40

50

2001-2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Fre

qu

ency

of

o

Year

2C BMethamphetaminep-Fluoroamphetamine

Tablets (n = 820)

Powders (n = 694)

Mean (n = 644) = 81.1 mg/tablet

(n = 295)

Frequency of occurrence Qualitative results

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2001-2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Freq

uenc

y of

occ

urre

nce

[%]

Year

TabletPowderCapsuleBlotterSeedsliquid

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2001-2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Freq

uenc

y of

occ

urre

nce

[%]

Year

TabletPowderCapsuleBlotterSeedsliquid

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

uenc

y of

occ

urre

nce

[%]

AmphetamineCocaineKetamineMDMA2C-BMethamphetamineHeroinMescaline

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2001-2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Freq

uenc

y of

occ

urre

nce

[%]

Year

AmphetamineCocaineKetamineMDMA2C-BMethamphetamineHeroinMescaline

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2001-2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

7264

54 53 49 48 51

2941

17

1125 24

19 22 13

18

28

3

14 11 1219 10

15

22

16

2 6

1 6 19

8

7 10 10 10 8 19 15 11 7

Freq

uenc

y of

occ

urre

nce

[%]

Year

Active ingredients (evolution time based)

MDMA Amphetamine Cocaine mCPP others