1
Subgroup 1 •Collect interoperability requirements •Define common, unified data model •Engage tool & data providers, data consumers Subgroup 2 •Identify and catalog common observation types •Engage data providers and information managers Subgroup 3 •Define extension ontologies of scientific terms •Build on outputs of group 2 •Engage range of domain scientists Subgroup 4 •Demonstrate interoperability across multiple systems •Define and prototype demonstration projects •Provide infrastructure to support other groups Objectives of SONet Broad Objectives Address semantic interoperability in environmental & earth sciences data [sharing, discovery, integration] by building a network of practitioners (SONet), including domain & computer scientists, & information mgrs to create generic, cross-disciplinary data interoperability solutions Immediate Goals to Develop An extensible & open observations data model (“core model”) to unify domain- specific approaches A semantic (ontology) framework for scientific terminology and corresponding domain extensions Demonstration prototypes using the model and framework to address critical data interoperability issues • Define and host Data Interoperability Challenge to test and refine above approaches Community workshops … to bring together project members, data managers, domain scientists, computer scientists, and members of the larger environmental informatics community Workshop 1: Collect detailed requirements and use cases to frame a “Scientific Observations Interoperability Challenge”; begin defining core model (held Oct, 2009) Workshop 2: Discuss various data models in terms of addressing “Scientific Observations Interoperability Challenge”; refine core model (expected Summer, 2010) Workshop 3: Roll-out of operational prototype; early evaluation and feedback Workshop 4: Training; further evaluative discussion, and plan SONet sustainability Similarities among Observational Data Models Prototype Architecture for Applying Semantic Annotation Subgroup 1: Core Data Model for Observations Subgroup 2: Catalog of Common Field Observations Subgroup 3: Scientist-Oriented Term Organization Subgroup 4: Demonstration Projects Core SONet Team ID# IN51B-1046 SONet: Towards a Shared Model for Earth Science Observations M. Schildhauer* 1 , H. Cao 1 , S. Bowers 2 , M. Jones 1 , D.L. McGuinness 3 , L.E. Bermudez 4 1. NCEAS, Santa Barbara, CA, USA 2. Gonzaga University, Spokane, WA, USA 3. McGuinness Associates, Latham, NY, USA 4. Southeastern Universities Research Association, Washington DC, USA * Contact: [email protected] Entity Context (other Observation) Characteri stic Observatio n Standard hasCharacteris tic hasMeasurement ofEnti ty hasContex t usesStandar d Protocol usesProto col FeatureOfInteres t ObservationContex t ObservedPropert y OM_Observation Result carrierOfCharacter istic forProper ty relatedCont extObservat ion hasResu lt OM_Process usesProcedur e Precision Value hasPrecision ofCharacterist ic hasValu e References: [1] Shawn Bowers, Joshua S. Madin and Mark P. Schildhauer, A Conceptual Modeling Framework for Expressing Observational Data Semantics. In ER 2008, 41-54. [2] OpenGIS observations and measurements encoding standard (O&M): http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/om SEEK Extensible Observation Ontology (OBOE) [1] OGC’s Observations and Measurements (O&M) [2] Entity FeatureOfInteres t Characteri stic ObservedProperty Measuremen t OM_Observation Protocol OM_Process Result Standard Value Precision Context ObservationConte xt Site Species Ind Wt GCE6 Picea Rubens 1 75.13 GCE6 Picea Rubens 2 179.8 1 GCE7 Picea Rubens 1 443.2 0 observation “o1” entity “Point_Location” measurement “m1” key yes Characteristic “GCE_Local-Code” Standard “Nominal” observation “o2” entity “Tree” measurement “m2” key yes Characteristic “SpeciesName” Standard “TaxonomicName” measurement “m3” key yes Characteristic “Local-ID” Standard “Nominal” measurement “m4” Characteristic “Mass” Standard “Ratio” context identifying yes “o1” map “Site” to “m1” map “Species” to “m2” map “Ind” to “m3” Map “Wt” to “m4” (b) Semantic annotation to dataset (a) (a) Dataset http://sonet.ecoinformatics.org Acknowledgements: NSF OCI INTEROP 0753144 Prototype Architecture Productiv ity Mass Mass Unit Kilogra m Biomass usesStandard Gram is- a Bio.Enti ty Tree Leaf Litter Tree Leaf Wet Weight Dry Weight Observatio n Observatio n Measurement Measuremen t Site Species In d Wt GCE6 Picea Rubens 1 75.13 GCE6 Picea Rubens 2 179.8 1 GCE7 Picea Rubens 1 443.2 0 Plac e Trea t Plo t LL sth C 1 0.003 sth C 1 0.002 sth N 1 0.008 Data Structural Metadata (e.g. EML) <attribute id=“att.4”> <attributeName> Wt </attributeName> </attribute> <attribute id=“att.4”> <attributeName> LL </attributeName> </attribute> hasMeasurement hasMeasurement 0.00 1 Semantic Annotation (e.g. OBOE) Domain- Specific Ontology is- a is- a is- a is- a is- a has- part has- part hasChara c- teristic is- a part- of is- a has- multiplier usesBase Standard ofEntit y ofEntit y ofCharacteris tic usesStandard usesStandard ofCharacteris tic Measuremen t ofFeatur e

Subgroup 1 Collect interoperability requirements Define common, unified data model Engage tool & data providers, data consumers Subgroup 2 Identify and

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Subgroup 1 Collect interoperability requirements Define common, unified data model Engage tool & data providers, data consumers Subgroup 2 Identify and

Subgroup 1• Collect interoperability requirements• Define common, unified data model• Engage tool & data providers, data consumers

Subgroup 2• Identify and catalog common observation types• Engage data providers and information managers

Subgroup 3• Define extension ontologies of scientific terms• Build on outputs of group 2• Engage range of domain scientists

Subgroup 4• Demonstrate interoperability across multiple systems• Define and prototype demonstration projects• Provide infrastructure to support other groups

Objectives of SONetBroad Objectives

Address semantic interoperability in environmental & earth sciences data [sharing, discovery, integration]

by building a network of practitioners (SONet), including domain & computer scientists, & information mgrs

to create generic, cross-disciplinary data interoperability solutions

Immediate Goals to Develop

• An extensible & open observations data model (“core model”) to unify domain-specific approaches

• A semantic (ontology) framework for scientific terminology and corresponding domain extensions

• Demonstration prototypes using the model and framework to address critical data interoperability issues

• Define and host Data Interoperability Challenge to test and refine above approaches

Community workshops … to bring together project members, data managers, domain scientists, computer scientists, and members

of the larger environmental informatics community

• Workshop 1: Collect detailed requirements and use cases to frame a “Scientific Observations Interoperability Challenge”; begin defining core model (held Oct, 2009)

• Workshop 2: Discuss various data models in terms of addressing “Scientific Observations Interoperability Challenge”; refine core model (expected Summer, 2010)

• Workshop 3: Roll-out of operational prototype; early evaluation and feedback• Workshop 4: Training; further evaluative discussion, and plan SONet sustainability

Similarities among Observational Data Models

Prototype Architecture for Applying Semantic Annotation

Subgroup 1:Core Data Model for

Observations

Subgroup 2:Catalog of Common Field Observations

Subgroup 3:Scientist-Oriented Term Organization

Subgroup 4:Demonstration

Projects

Core SONetTeam

ID# IN51B-1046 SONet: Towards a Shared Model for Earth Science ObservationsM. Schildhauer*1, H. Cao1, S. Bowers2, M. Jones1, D.L. McGuinness3, L.E. Bermudez4

1. NCEAS, Santa Barbara, CA, USA 2. Gonzaga University, Spokane, WA, USA

3. McGuinness Associates, Latham, NY, USA 4. Southeastern Universities Research Association, Washington DC, USA

* Contact: [email protected]

Entity

Context (other Observation)

Characteristic

Observation

Standard

hasCharacteristichasMeasurement

ofEntity

hasContext

usesStandard

Protocol

usesProtocol

FeatureOfInterest

ObservationContext

ObservedProperty

OM_Observation

Result

carrierOfCharacteristic

forProperty

relatedContextObservation

hasResult

OM_Process

usesProcedure

Precision Value

hasPrecision

ofCharacteristic

hasValue

References:

[1] Shawn Bowers, Joshua S. Madin and Mark P. Schildhauer, A Conceptual Modeling Framework for Expressing Observational Data Semantics. In ER 2008, 41-54.

[2] OpenGIS observations and measurements encoding standard (O&M): http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/om

SEEK Extensible Observation Ontology (OBOE) [1]

OGC’s Observations and Measurements (O&M) [2]

Entity FeatureOfInterest

Characteristic ObservedProperty

Measurement OM_Observation

Protocol OM_Process

Result

Standard

Value

Precision

Context ObservationContext

Site Species Ind Wt …

GCE6 Picea Rubens 1 75.13 …

GCE6 Picea Rubens 2 179.81 …

GCE7 Picea Rubens 1 443.20 …

… … … … …

observation “o1”

entity “Point_Location”

measurement “m1” key yes

Characteristic “GCE_Local-Code”

Standard “Nominal”

observation “o2”

entity “Tree”

measurement “m2” key yes

Characteristic “SpeciesName”

Standard “TaxonomicName”

measurement “m3” key yes

Characteristic “Local-ID”

Standard “Nominal”

measurement “m4”

Characteristic “Mass”

Standard “Ratio”

context identifying yes “o1”

map “Site” to “m1”

map “Species” to “m2”

map “Ind” to “m3”

Map “Wt” to “m4”

observation “o1”

entity “Point_Location”

measurement “m1” key yes

Characteristic “GCE_Local-Code”

Standard “Nominal”

observation “o2”

entity “Tree”

measurement “m2” key yes

Characteristic “SpeciesName”

Standard “TaxonomicName”

measurement “m3” key yes

Characteristic “Local-ID”

Standard “Nominal”

measurement “m4”

Characteristic “Mass”

Standard “Ratio”

context identifying yes “o1”

map “Site” to “m1”

map “Species” to “m2”

map “Ind” to “m3”

Map “Wt” to “m4”

(b) Semantic annotation to dataset (a)

(a) Dataset

http://sonet.ecoinformatics.org Acknowledgements: NSF OCI INTEROP 0753144

Prototype Architecture

Productivity Mass Mass Unit

Kilogram

Biomass

usesStandard

Gram

is-a

Bio.EntityTree

Leaf LitterTree Leaf Wet Weight Dry Weight

ObservationObservation

MeasurementMeasurement

Site Species Ind Wt

GCE6 Picea Rubens 1 75.13

GCE6 Picea Rubens 2 179.81

GCE7 Picea Rubens 1 443.20

… … … …

Place Treat Plot LL

sth C 1 0.003

sth C 1 0.002

sth N 1 0.008

… … … …

Data

StructuralMetadata (e.g. EML)

<attribute id=“att.4”> <attributeName> Wt </attributeName></attribute>

<attribute id=“att.4”> <attributeName> LL </attributeName></attribute>

hasMeasurement hasMeasurement

0.001

Semantic Annotation(e.g. OBOE)

Domain-Specific Ontology

is-a is-ais-a

is-a is-a

has-part

has-part

hasCharac-teristic

is-a

part-of is-a has-multiplierusesBaseStandard

ofEntityofEntity

ofCharacteristic

usesStandard

usesStandard

ofCharacteristic

Measurement

ofFeature